Antimicrobials and Food-Related Stresses As Selective Factors for Antibiotic Resistance Along the Farm to Fork Continuum

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Antimicrobials and Food-Related Stresses As Selective Factors for Antibiotic Resistance Along the Farm to Fork Continuum antibiotics Review Antimicrobials and Food-Related Stresses as Selective Factors for Antibiotic Resistance along the Farm to Fork Continuum Federica Giacometti 1 , Hesamaddin Shirzad-Aski 2 and Susana Ferreira 3,* 1 Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, University of Bologna, Ozzano Emilia, 40064 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] 2 Infectious Diseases Research Center, Golestan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan 49178-67439, Iran; [email protected] 3 CICS-UBI-Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde, Universidade da Beira Interior, 6200-506 Covilhã, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global problem and there has been growing concern associated with its widespread along the animal–human–environment interface. The farm-to-fork continuum was highlighted as a possible reservoir of AMR, and a hotspot for the emergence and spread of AMR. However, the extent of the role of non-antibiotic antimicrobials and other food- related stresses as selective factors is still in need of clarification. This review addresses the use of non-antibiotic stressors, such as antimicrobials, food-processing treatments, or even novel approaches to ensure food safety, as potential drivers for resistance to clinically relevant antibiotics. The co- selection and cross-adaptation events are covered, which may induce a decreased susceptibility of foodborne bacteria to antibiotics. Although the available studies address the complexity involved Citation: Giacometti, F.; in these phenomena, further studies are needed to help better understand the real risk of using Shirzad-Aski, H.; Ferreira, S. food-chain-related stressors, and possibly to allow the establishment of early warnings of potential Antimicrobials and Food-Related Stresses as Selective Factors for resistance mechanisms. Antibiotic Resistance along the Farm to Fork Continuum. Antibiotics 2021, Keywords: antimicrobial resistance; food chain; stressors; cross-resistance; adaptive response 10, 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/ antibiotics10060671 Academic Editor David 1. Introduction Rodríguez-Lázaro In recent years, there has been an effort to reduce foodborne diseases, by the implemen- tation of food safety measures from farm to fork. Nonetheless, a high burden of foodborne Received: 5 May 2021 diseases still exists, with the World Health Organization estimating that each year world- Accepted: 1 June 2021 wide, the consumption of unsafe food causes about 600 million cases of foodborne diseases Published: 4 June 2021 and 420,000 deaths [1]. Further, amongst the cases of foodborne diseases, the ones caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are increasing and are a major health problem, with the food Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral chain being pointed to as a relevant vehicle of antibiotic resistance to humans [2]. with regard to jurisdictional claims in The use and misuse of antimicrobial compounds have been related to an increase in published maps and institutional affil- the emergence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) amongst foodborne microorganisms. The iations. identification of resistant microorganisms at every stage of the food chain, from farm to fork, highlights the major concern that is AMR [2,3]. The cross-adaptation and selective pressure exercised by antibiotics and biocides are considered as a key motive power for the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance along the food chain [4]. However, other Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. factors, such as different antimicrobial approaches, or even agricultural or food-processing Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. procedures, may have a role in the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance along the This article is an open access article food chain. distributed under the terms and During food production and processing, different types of antimicrobials are used conditions of the Creative Commons throughout the several stages of the food chain, namely, antibiotics, agricides and biocides, Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ among others (e.g., agrochemicals, feed and food preservatives, decontaminants, or dis- 4.0/). infectants). These products are applied to ensure food quality and safety, as well as to Antibiotics 2021, 10, 671. https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10060671 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/antibiotics Antibiotics 2021, 10, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 29 Antibiotics 2021, 10, 671 2 of 29 disinfectants). These products are applied to ensure food quality and safety, as well as to assureassure the the efficiency efficiency of of the the system. system. Antibiotics Antibiotics may may be be used used not not only only for for the the treatment treatment of of animalsanimals with with a a manifest manifest clinical clinical disease, disease, but but also also for for metaphylaxis, metaphylaxis, prophylaxis, prophylaxis, growth growth promotion,promotion, or or even even in plantin plant agriculture. agriculture. Antimicrobials Antimicrobials may may also bealso added be added to feed to and feed food and asfood preservatives as preservatives to control to control foodborne foodborne bacteria, ba inhibitcteria, spoilageinhibit spoilage microorganisms, microorganisms, and extend and theextend shelf the life shelf of the life final of products.the final products. Decontaminants Decontaminants can be used can tobe inactivate,used to inactivate, or inhibit, or theinhibit, growth the of growth pathogenic of pathogenic and spoilage and spoilage microorganisms microorganisms in fresh food,in fresh while food, disinfectants while disin- arefectants mostly are used mostly to reduce used theto reduce level of the microorganisms level of microorganisms in abioticsurfaces, in abiotic equipment, surfaces, equip- and othersment, [4and,5]. others [4,5]. Overall,Overall, foodborne foodborne bacteria bacteria are are subject subject to to several several stresses stresses during during their their lifecycle, lifecycle, and and throughoutthroughout all all the the processes processes associated associated with with food food production, production, processing processing and and storage. storage. TheseThese stresses stresses can can be be physical, physical, chemical, chemical, or or biological, biological, and and ultimately ultimately may may lead lead to to a a stress stress adaptationadaptation (Figure (Figure1). 1). The The adaptative adaptative or protectiveor protective response response may, may, in turn, in turn, confer confer protection protec- totion the to same the stresssame orstress against or ag aainst different a different type of type stress, of knownstress, known as stress as cross-adaptation stress cross-adapta- [6]. Usually,tion [6]. this Usually, adaptation this adaptation occurs as a occurs cellular as response a cellular of response the bacterium of the to bacterium the stressor, to bythe regulatingstressor, by molecular regulating mechanisms molecular mechanisms that, ultimately, that, mayultimately, result inmay the result cellular in the repair cellular or damagerepair or tolerance, damage tolerance, in the maintenance in the maintenance of cell homeostasis, of cell homeostasis, or even inor theeven removal in the removal of the stressorof the stressor [6,7]. In [6,7]. turn, In this turn, cross-adaptation this cross-adap maytation select may variants select withvariants increased with increased tolerance ortol- resistance, including decreased susceptibility to several antibiotics, namely, some antibiotics erance or resistance, including decreased susceptibility to several antibiotics, namely, relevant to clinical practice. some antibiotics relevant to clinical practice. FigureFigure 1. 1.Schematic Schematic overview overview of of factors factors contributing contributing to to bacterial bacteria adaptativel adaptative responses. responses. AMR: AMR: antimicrobial antimicrobial resistance. resistance. TakingTaking this this into into consideration, consideration, this this review review focused focused on on the the cross-adaptation cross-adaptation due due to to the the non-antibiotic,non-antibiotic, food-chain-related food-chain-related stresses, stresses, associated associated with with a a diminished diminished susceptibility susceptibility to to antibioticsantibiotics and and facilitation facilitation of of antimicrobial antimicrobial emergence, emergence, and, and, thus, thus, the the spread spread of of antibiotic antibiotic resistanceresistance along along the the food food chain, chain, while while also also acting acting as as an an AMR AMR reservoir. reservoir. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 671 3 of 29 2. Interaction of the Use of Non-Antibiotic Antimicrobials with A Potential Antibiotic Decreased Susceptibility A further driver of resistance is the non-antibiotic antibacterial, such as agrochemicals, biocides, heavy metals, or food preservatives, for which bacteria could acquire antibiotic resistance by co- or cross-resistance mechanisms. 2.1. Agrochemicals Agricultural practices can be vastly affected by plant diseases, which may be managed by using agrochemicals to ensure a sustainable and prolific agricultural system. However, the intensive use of these chemicals contributes to its persistence and dispersion in the en- vironment, adversely affecting humans and the ecosystem [8,9]. Furthermore, the presence of a diversity of drugs, commonly used in humans and animals, as well as on agricultural procedures, in surface and wastewaters, even in trace amounts, may enter the food chain and potentiate
Recommended publications
  • A Review on Antimicrobial Resistance in Developing Countries
    mac har olo P gy : & O y r p t e s i n Biochemistry & Pharmacology: Open A m c e c h e c Ravalli, et al. Biochem Pharmacol 2015, 4:2 s o i s B Access DOI: 10.4172/2167-0501.1000r001 ISSN: 2167-0501 Review Open Access A Review on Antimicrobial Resistance in Developing Countries Ravalli R1*, NavaJyothi CH2, Sushma B3 and Amala Reddy J4 1Deparment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Vishakapatnam, India 2University College of Technology, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India 3Deparment of Medicinal Chemistry, National Institute of Pharmaceutical Education and Research (NIPER) Hyderabad, India 4Deparment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India *Corresponding author: Ravalli R, Deparment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Andhra University, Vishakapatnam, India, Tel: + 0437-869-033; E-mail: [email protected] Received date: April 13, 2015; Accepted date: April 14, 2015; Published date: April 21, 2015 Copyright: © 2015 Ravalli Remella. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestri cted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Availability of Antimicrobial Drugs isolates were proof against Principen, Co-trimoxazole, and bactericide, and 14-40% were given with Mecillinam [6]. This was associate degree Although foremost potent and recently developed antimicrobial outsized increase over the half resistant isolates notable in 1991, before medicine are offered throughout the globe, in developing countries the drug was wide on the market. Throughout infectious disease their use is confined to people who are flush enough to afford them. In epidemics the organism has the flexibleness to develop increasing tertiary referral hospitals like the Kenyatta National Hospital in resistance, typically by acquisition of plasmids.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 12 Antimicrobial Therapy Antibiotics
    Chapter 12 Antimicrobial Therapy Topics: • Ideal drug - Antimicrobial Therapy - Selective Toxicity • Terminology - Survey of Antimicrobial Drug • Antibiotics - Microbial Drug Resistance - Drug and Host Interaction An ideal antimicrobic: Chemotherapy is the use of any chemical - soluble in body fluids, agent in the treatment of disease. - selectively toxic , - nonallergenic, A chemotherapeutic agent or drug is any - reasonable half life (maintained at a chemical agent used in medical practice. constant therapeutic concentration) An antibiotic agent is usually considered to - unlikely to elicit resistance, be a chemical substance made by a - has a long shelf life, microorganism that can inhibit the growth or - reasonably priced. kill microorganisms. There is no ideal antimicrobic An antimicrobic or antimicrobial agent is Selective Toxicity - Drugs that specifically target a chemical substance similar to an microbial processes, and not the human host’s. antibiotic, but may be synthetic. Antibiotics Spectrum of antibiotics and targets • Naturally occurring antimicrobials – Metabolic products of bacteria and fungi – Reduce competition for nutrients and space • Bacteria – Streptomyces, Bacillus, • Molds – Penicillium, Cephalosporium * * 1 The mechanism of action for different 5 General Mechanisms of Action for antimicrobial drug targets in bacterial cells Antibiotics - Inhibition of Cell Wall Synthesis - Disruption of Cell Membrane Function - Inhibition of Protein Synthesis - Inhibition of Nucleic Acid Synthesis - Anti-metabolic activity Antibiotics
    [Show full text]
  • Mankocide® Fungicide/Bactericide
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Issue Date 25-Feb-2017 Revision Date 25-Feb-2017 Version 1 1. IDENTIFICATION Product identifier Product Name ManKocide® Fungicide/Bactericide Other means of identification Product Code 91411-7 Synonyms ManKocide DF, B12262770 Registration Number(s) 91411-7-70051 Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use Recommended Use Fungicide Bactericide Uses advised against No information available Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Manufacturer Address Distributed by: Kocide LLC Certis U.S.A. L.L.C. 9145 Guilford Road, Suite 175 9145 Guilford Road, Suite 175 Columbia, MD 21046 Columbia, MD 21046 USA USA Website: www.kocide.com www.certisusa.com Emergency telephone number Company Phone Number Certis USA +1 301-604-7340 Emergency Telephone ChemTel, Inc.: 1-800-255-3924 (outside the U.S. 1-813-248-0585) POISON CONTROL CENTER: 800-222-1222 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION Classification OSHA Regulatory Status This chemical is considered hazardous by the 2012 OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) Acute toxicity - Oral Category 4 Acute toxicity - Inhalation (Dusts/Mists) Category 4 Serious eye damage/eye irritation Category 1 Skin sensitization Category 1 Carcinogenicity Category 1A Reproductive toxicity Category 2 Label elements Emergency Overview Danger Hazard statements Harmful if swallowed Harmful if inhaled Causes serious eye damage May cause an allergic skin reaction May cause cancer Suspected of damaging fertility or the unborn child _____________________________________________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Resistance: from the Bench to Patients
    antibiotics Editorial Antibiotic Resistance: From the Bench to Patients Márió Gajdács 1,* and Fernando Albericio 2,3 1 Department of Pharmacodynamics and Biopharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Dóm tér 10., 6720 Szeged, Hungary 2 School of Chemistry, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban 4001, South Africa 3 Department of Organic Chemistry, University of Barcelona, CIBER-BBN, 08028 Barcelona, Spain * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +36-62-341-330 Received: 20 August 2019; Accepted: 26 August 2019; Published: 27 August 2019 The discovery and subsequent clinical introduction of antibiotics is one of the most important game-changers in the history of medicine [1]. These drugs have saved millions of lives from infections that would previously have been fatal, and later, they allowed for the introduction of surgical interventions, organ transplantation, care of premature infants, and cancer chemotherapy [2]. Nevertheless, the therapy of bacterial infections is becoming less and less straightforward due to the emergence of multidrug resistance (MDR) in these pathogens [3]. Direct consequences of antibiotic resistance include delays in the onset of the appropriate (effective) antimicrobial therapy, the need to use older, more toxic antibiotics (e.g., colistin) with a disadvantageous side-effect profile, longer hospital stays, and an increasing burden on the healthcare infrastructure; overall, a decrease in the quality-of-life (QoL) and an increase in the mortality rate of the affected patients [4,5]. To highlight the severity of the issue, several international declarations have been published to call governments around the globe to take action on antimicrobial resistance [6–9]. Since the 1980s, pharmaceutical companies have slowly turned away from antimicrobial research and towards the drug therapy of chronic non-communicable diseases [10,11].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxula Adeninivorans
    Biernacki et al. Microb Cell Fact (2017) 16:144 DOI 10.1186/s12934-017-0751-4 Microbial Cell Factories RESEARCH Open Access Enhancement of poly(3‑hydroxybutyrate‑co‑ 3‑hydroxyvalerate) accumulation in Arxula adeninivorans by stabilization of production Mateusz Biernacki1, Marek Marzec1,6, Thomas Roick2, Reinhard Pätz3, Kim Baronian4, Rüdiger Bode5 and Gotthard Kunze1* Abstract Background: In recent years the production of biobased biodegradable plastics has been of interest of research- ers partly due to the accumulation of non-biodegradable plastics in the environment and to the opportunity for new applications. Commonly investigated are the polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) poly(hydroxybutyrate) and poly(hydroxybutyrate-co-hydroxyvalerate) (PHB-V). The latter has the advantage of being tougher and less brittle. The production of these polymers in bacteria is well established but production in yeast may have some advantages, e.g. the ability to use a broad spectrum of industrial by-products as a carbon sources. Results: In this study we increased the synthesis of PHB-V in the non-conventional yeast Arxula adeninivorans by stabilization of polymer accumulation via genetic modifcation and optimization of culture conditions. An A. adenini- vorans strain with overexpressed PHA pathway genes for β-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl-CoA reductase, PHAs synthase and the phasin gene was able to accumulate an unexpectedly high level of polymer. It was found that an opti- 1 mized strain cultivated in a shaking incubator is able to produce up to 52.1% of the DCW of PHB-V (10.8 g L− ) with 12.3%mol of PHV fraction. Although further optimization of cultivation conditions in a fed-batch bioreactor led to lower polymer content (15.3% of the DCW of PHB-V), the PHV fraction and total polymer level increased to 23.1%mol 1 and 11.6 g L− respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020 Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020
    First independent framework for assessing pharmaceutical company action Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020 Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark 2020 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Access to Medicine Foundation would like to thank the following people and organisations for their contributions to this report.1 FUNDERS The Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark research programme is made possible with financial support from UK AID and the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport. Expert Review Committee Research Team Reviewers Hans Hogerzeil - Chair Gabrielle Breugelmans Christine Årdal Gregory Frank Fatema Rafiqi Karen Gallant Nina Grundmann Adrián Alonso Ruiz Hans Hogerzeil Magdalena Kettis Ruth Baron Hitesh Hurkchand Joakim Larsson Dulce Calçada Joakim Larsson Marc Mendelson Moska Hellamand Marc Mendelson Margareth Ndomondo-Sigonda Kevin Outterson Katarina Nedog Sarah Paulin (Observer) Editorial Team Andrew Singer Anna Massey Deirdre Cogan ACCESS TO MEDICINE FOUNDATION Rachel Jones The Access to Medicine Foundation is an independent Emma Ross non-profit organisation based in the Netherlands. It aims to advance access to medicine in low- and middle-income Additional contributors countries by stimulating and guiding the pharmaceutical Thomas Collin-Lefebvre industry to play a greater role in improving access to Alex Kong medicine. Nestor Papanikolaou Address Contact Naritaweg 227-A For more information about this publication, please contact 1043 CB, Amsterdam Jayasree K. Iyer, Executive Director The Netherlands [email protected] +31 (0) 20 215 35 35 www.amrbenchmark.org 1 This acknowledgement is not intended to imply that the individuals and institutions referred to above endorse About the cover: Young woman from the Antimicrobial Resistance Benchmark methodology, Brazil, where 40%-60% of infections are analyses or results.
    [Show full text]
  • Sodium Propionate and Sodium Butyrate Promote Fatty Acid Oxidation in Hepg2 Cells Under Oxidative Stress
    SODIUM PROPIONATE AND SODIUM BUTYRATE PROMOTE FATTY ACID OXIDATION IN HEPG2 CELLS UNDER OXIDATIVE STRESS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The School of Nutrition and Food Sciences by Kristina Jazmin Cook B.S., Louisiana State University, 2014 May 2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I want to give thanks to my God for blessing me with the strength and wisdom to accomplish this goal. With God all things are possible, and I am so thankful that I was given this opportunity. Next, I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Jack Losso, for his support, encouragement, and giving me the opportunity to pursue my doctoral degree under his mentorship. I would also like to thank Dr. Frank Greenway and Dr. Ann Coulter at Pennington Biomedical Research Center for letting me work in their laboratory and taking the time to teach and train me. I extend my appreciation to my research advisory committee: Dr. Frank Greenway, Dr. Mike Keenan, and Dr. Zhimin Xu for their valuable time and guidance. I would also like to thank Dr. Joseph Francis, my Dean’s Representative, for accepting to serve on my committee, providing valuable feedback, and allowing me to work in his laboratory while teaching and training me. I would also like to thank my colleagues and lab mates, Nick Magazine and Millicent Yeboah-Awudzi, for all their help and support. I would also like to thank Dr. Marvin Moncada, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dietzia Papillomatosis Sp. Nov., a Novel Actinomycete Isolated from the Skin of an Immunocompetent Patient with Confluent and Reticulated Papillomatosis
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Northumbria Research Link International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology (2008), 58, 68–72 DOI 10.1099/ijs.0.65178-0 Dietzia papillomatosis sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from the skin of an immunocompetent patient with confluent and reticulated papillomatosis Amanda L. Jones,1,2 Roland J. Koerner,3 Sivakumar Natarajan,4 John D. Perry2 and Michael Goodfellow1 Correspondence 1School of Biology, King George VIth Building, University of Newcastle, Roland J. Koerner Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK Roland.Koerner@ 2Department of Microbiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK chs.northy.nhs.uk 3Department of Microbiology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK 4Department of Dermatology, Sunderland Royal Hospital, Kayll Road, Sunderland SR4 7TP, UK An actinomycete isolated from an immunocompetent patient suffering from confluent and reticulated papillomatosis was characterized using a polyphasic taxonomic approach. The organism had chemotaxonomic and morphological properties that were consistent with its assignment to the genus Dietzia and it formed a distinct phyletic line within the Dietzia 16S rRNA gene tree. It shared a 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity of 98.3 % with its nearest neighbour, the type strain of Dietzia cinnamea, and could be distinguished from the type strains of all Dietzia species using a combination of phenotypic properties. It is apparent from genotypic and phenotypic data that the organism represents a novel species in the genus Dietzia. The name proposed for this taxon is Dietzia papillomatosis; the type strain is N 1280T (5DSM 44961T5NCIMB 14145T).
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Resistance in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria
    PY56CH08-Sundin ARI 23 May 2018 12:16 Annual Review of Phytopathology Antibiotic Resistance in Plant-Pathogenic Bacteria George W. Sundin1 and Nian Wang2 1Department of Plant, Soil, and Microbial Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA; email: [email protected] 2Citrus Research and Education Center, Department of Microbiology and Cell Science, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Lake Alfred, Florida 33850, USA Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018. 56:8.1–8.20 Keywords The Annual Review of Phytopathology is online at kasugamycin, oxytetracycline, streptomycin, resistome phyto.annualreviews.org https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-phyto-080417- Abstract 045946 Antibiotics have been used for the management of relatively few bacterial Copyright c 2018 by Annual Reviews. plant diseases and are largely restricted to high-value fruit crops because of Access provided by INSEAD on 06/01/18. For personal use only. All rights reserved the expense involved. Antibiotic resistance in plant-pathogenic bacteria has Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2018.56. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org become a problem in pathosystems where these antibiotics have been used for many years. Where the genetic basis for resistance has been examined, antibiotic resistance in plant pathogens has most often evolved through the acquisition of a resistance determinant via horizontal gene transfer. For ex- ample, the strAB streptomycin-resistance genes occur in Erwinia amylovora, Pseudomonas syringae,andXanthomonas campestris, and these genes have pre- sumably been acquired from nonpathogenic epiphytic bacteria colocated on plant hosts under antibiotic selection. We currently lack knowledge of the effect of the microbiome of commensal organisms on the potential of plant pathogens to evolve antibiotic resistance.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges to Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance
    Challenges to Tackling Antimicrobial Resistance Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a biological mechanism whereby a microorganism evolves over time to develop the ability to become resistant to antimicrobial therapies such as antibiotics. The drivers of and poten- tial solutions to AMR are complex, often spanning multiple sectors. The internationally recognized response to AMR advocates for a ‘One Health’ approach, which requires policies to be developed and implemented across human, animal, and environmental health. To date, misaligned economic incentives have slowed the development of novel antimicrobials and lim- ited efforts to reduce antimicrobial usage. However, the research which underpins the variety of policy options to tackle AMR is rapidly evolving across multiple disciplines such as human medicine, veterinary medicine, agricultural sciences, epidemiology, economics, sociology and psychology. By bringing together in one place the latest evidence and analysing the different facets of the complex problem of tackling AMR, this book offers an accessible summary for policy-makers, academics and students on the big questions around AMR policy. This title is also available as Open Access on Cambridge Core. Michael anderson is a Research Officer in Health Policy at the Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, and a Medical Doctor undertaking General Practice specialty training. Michele cecchini is a Senior Health Economist, Health Division, in the Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. elias Mossialos is Brian Abel-Smith Professor of Health Policy, Head of the Department of Health Policy at the London School of Economics and Political Science, and Co-Director of the European Observatory on Health Systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Socioeconomic Factors Associated with Antimicrobial Resistance Of
    01 Pan American Journal Original research of Public Health 02 03 04 05 06 Socioeconomic factors associated with antimicrobial 07 08 resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 09 10 Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in Chilean 11 12 hospitals (2008–2017) 13 14 15 Kasim Allel,1 Patricia García,2 Jaime Labarca,3 José M. Munita,4 Magdalena Rendic,5 Grupo 16 6 5 17 Colaborativo de Resistencia Bacteriana, and Eduardo A. Undurraga 18 19 20 21 Suggested citation Allel K, García P, Labarca J, Munita JM, Rendic M; Grupo Colaborativo de Resistencia Bacteriana; et al. Socioeconomic fac- 22 tors associated with antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in 23 Chilean hospitals (2008–2017). Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2020;44:e30. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2020.30 24 25 26 27 ABSTRACT Objective. To identify socioeconomic factors associated with antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeru- 28 ginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli in Chilean hospitals (2008–2017). 29 Methods. We reviewed the scientific literature on socioeconomic factors associated with the emergence and 30 dissemination of antimicrobial resistance. Using multivariate regression, we tested findings from the literature drawing from a longitudinal dataset on antimicrobial resistance from 41 major private and public hospitals and 31 a nationally representative household survey in Chile (2008–2017). We estimated resistance rates for three pri- 32 ority antibiotic–bacterium pairs, as defined by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 33 i.e., imipenem and meropenem resistant P. aeruginosa, cloxacillin resistant S. aureus, and cefotaxime and 34 ciprofloxacin resistant E. coli. 35 Results.
    [Show full text]