Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision T A S M A N I A LAW REFORM I N S T I T U T E Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision FINAL REPORT NO 17 AUGUST 2012 ! ! CONTENTS #$%&'()*"&$!&$!*+,!-).()$")!/)0!1,%&'(!#$.*"*2*,!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!"4! 567$&08,9:(,$*.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!"4! ;2(()'<!&%!',6&((,$9)*"&$.!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!4"! !"#$%&'%()$#*+,-$.*)%////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////%&% =3=! >)67:'&2$9!*&!*+".!',?&'*!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!=! =3@! A,,9B)67!*&!*+,!#..2,.!C)?,'!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@! =3D! ;6&?,!)$9!7,<!*,'(.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!D! =3E! F2*8"$,!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!E! !"#$%0'%1"-23#*,)+%/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////%4% @3@! G"'62(6"."&$!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!H! @3D! G"'62(6"."&$!"$!-).()$")!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!I! @3E! -+,!6&.*.!)$9!B,$,%"*.!&%!6"'62(6"."&$!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!J! @3H! G"'62(6"."&$!)$9!*+,!8)0!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!=H! !"#$%5'%678%9,##8)$%:";%////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////%&<% D3@! G'"("$)8!',.?&$."B"8"*<!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!=K! D3D! 52*+&'".)*"&$L!%)("8<!8)0!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!=J! D3E! C'"4)*,!8)0!',.?&$."B"8"*",.!&%!6"'62(6".,'.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!=M! D3H! -+,!2.,!)$9!.)8,!&%!,N6".,9!%&',.7"$!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@O! D3I! /"("*)*"&$!&%!)6*"&$.!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@=! D3K! P2()$!'":+*.!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@=! !"#$%='%:83.>?"$.*)%.)%@*#8.3)%A,#.>+.-$.*)>%/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////%05% E3@! ;&2*+!5%'"6)!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@D! E3D! ;0,9,$!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@E! E3E! -+,!Q$"*,9!;*)*,.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@I! E3H! G&$6829"$:!',()'7.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!@J! !"#$%4'%!8#>B8-$.C8>%*)%9.#-,D-.>.*)%/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////%5E% H3@! 1,.?&$9,$*.R!4",0.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!DO! H3D! -+,!-).()$")!/)0!1,%&'(!#$.*"*2*,R.!4",0!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!HO! H3E! G&$6829"$:!',()'7.!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!HE! !"#$%F'%!8#>B8-$.C8>%*)%G8H*#D%/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////%44% I3@! -+,!9,."')B"8"*<!&%!8)0!',%&'(!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!HH! I3D! -+,!6"'62(6"."&$!&%!)928*.!)$9!6)?)B8,!("$&'.!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!I=! I3E! -+,!6"'62(6"."&$!&%!"$6)?)B8,!("$&'.L!6'"("$)8!8")B"8"*<!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!ID! I3H! -+,!6"'62(6"."&$!&%!"$6)?)B8,!("$&'.L!6"4"8!8")B"8"*<!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!K=! I3I! S)$9)*&'<!6&2'*!)2*+&'".)*"&$!333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!KH! I3K! -+,!?'&4"."&$!&%!"$%&'()*"&$!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!KM! I3J! G"'62(6".,'!?')6*"."$:!.*)$9)'9.!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!JD! I3M! -+,!6&((,'6")8!).?,6*.!&%!6"'62(6"."$:!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!JJ! I3=O! /"("*)*"&$!&%!)6*"&$.!8)0!33333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!MO! I3==! 1,(&4"$:!*+,!%)28*!',T2"',(,$*.!&%!)$!)6*"&$!%&'!6&(?,$.)*"&$!33333333333333333333333333333333333333!MI! 5??,$9"N!=!3333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333333!MM! ! """! Information on the Tasmania Law Reform Institute The Tasmania Law Reform Institute (the Institute) was established on 23 July 2001 by agreement between the Government of the State of Tasmania, the University of Tasmania and The Law Society of Tasmania. The creation of the Institute was part of a Partnership Agreement between the University and the State Government signed in 2000. The Institute is based at the Sandy Bay campus of the University of Tasmania within the Faculty of Law. The Institute undertakes law reform work and research on topics proposed by the Government, the community, the University and the Institute itself. The Institute’s Director is Professor Kate Warner of the University of Tasmania. The members of the Board of the Institute are Professor Kate Warner (Chair), Professor Margaret Otlowski (Dean of the Faculty of Law at the University of Tasmania), The Honourable Justice AM Blow OAM (appointed by the Honourable Chief Justice of Tasmania), Ms Lisa Hutton (appointed by the Attorney-General), Mr Philip Jackson (appointed by the Law Society), Ms Terese Henning (appointed by the Council of the University), Mr Craig Mackie (nominated by the Tasmanian Bar Association) and Ms Ann Hughes (community representative). Contact information: Tasmania Law Reform Institute Private Bag 89, Hobart, TAS Australia, 7001 Email: [email protected] Telephone: (03) 62262069 Fax: (03) 62267623 This report is available on the Institute’s webpage at: www.law.utas.edu.au/reform Acknowledgments This report was prepared for the Board by Warwick Marshall. Professor Kate Warner and George Zdenkowski provided invaluable support in the preparation of this report. The report benefited greatly from their experience and expertise. The author could not be more grateful for their assistance. The Institute would like to thank Daniel Albert (President of the Hobart Hebrew Congregation), Rabbi John Levi, David Clarke and George Goldsteen for liaising with the Institute and providing information on the practice of circumcision in Tasmania’s Jewish community. The Institute has also benefited from exchanges with Imam Sabri Samson and Murshid Ali ElSenossi (the Almiraj Sufi & Islamic Study Centre). They each provided the author with information on the practice of circumcision in Tasmania’s Muslim community. The Institute is grateful for the assistance of Dr Gerard Gill (Northern Suburbs Medical Service), Dr Rob Jensen (urological surgeon), Dr Steve Sonneveld (obstetrician), Grant Musgrave (Director of Operations – Launceston, Calvary Health Care) and Tracy Malloy (Health Information Manager – Hobart, Calvary Health Care) for the provision of information about the practice of circumcision in Tasmania’s medical community. The Institute is also appreciative of Elise Anderson (Librarian, Government Offices Library), Claes Tollin (Unit for Legal Affairs, The National Board of Health and Welfare), Ann Clements (Senior "4! Registry Officer, The National Board of Health and Welfare) and Heléne Lundgren (Lagrummet.se) for the provision of information on the regulation of circumcision in Sweden. The Institute would like to thank Bruce Newey for editing and formatting this report. It would also like to thank Professor Margaret Otlowski for her assistance in the preparation of the early drafts of this report. Finally, the Institute would like to thank each individual who took the time to prepare a response to the Institute’s Non-Therapeutic Male Circumcision Issues Paper. ! 4! Summary of recommendations Recommendation 1 The Institute supports the enactment of legislation to reform the law governing circumcision. Recommendation 2 The Institute recommends reform to provide a clear legislative basis for the legality of circumcision performed at the request of an adult or capable minor. Recommendation 3 The Institute
Recommended publications
  • A Discursive Approach to Female Circumcision: Why the United Nations Should Drop the One-Sided Conversation in Favor of the Vagina Dialogues
    NORTH CAROLINA JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL LAW Volume 38 Number 2 Article 6 Winter 2013 A Discursive Approach to Female Circumcision: Why the United Nations Should Drop the One-Sided Conversation in Favor of the Vagina Dialogues Kathleen Bradshaw Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj Recommended Citation Kathleen Bradshaw, A Discursive Approach to Female Circumcision: Why the United Nations Should Drop the One-Sided Conversation in Favor of the Vagina Dialogues, 38 N.C. J. INT'L L. 601 (2012). Available at: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol38/iss2/6 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Carolina Journal of International Law by an authorized editor of Carolina Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Discursive Approach to Female Circumcision: Why the United Nations Should Drop the One-Sided Conversation in Favor of the Vagina Dialogues Cover Page Footnote International Law; Commercial Law; Law This note is available in North Carolina Journal of International Law: https://scholarship.law.unc.edu/ncilj/vol38/iss2/ 6 A Discursive Approach to Female Circumcision: Why the United Nations Should Drop the One-Sided Conversation in Favor of the Vagina Dialogues KATHLEEN BRADSHAWt I. Introduction ........................................602 II. Background................................ 608 A. Female Circumcision ...................... 608 B. International Legal Response....................610 III. Discussion......................... ........ 613 A. Foreign Domestic Legislation............. ... .......... 616 B. Enforcement.. ...................... ...... 617 C. Cultural Insensitivity: Bad for Development..............620 1. Human Rights, Culture, and Development: The United Nations ................... ............... 621 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Bris Or Brit Milah (Ritual Circumcision) According to Jewish Law, a Healthy Baby Boy Is Circumcised on the Eighth Day After His Birth
    Bris or Brit milah (ritual circumcision) According to Jewish law, a healthy baby boy is circumcised on the eighth day after his birth. The brit milah, the ritual ceremony of removing the foreskin which covers the glans of the penis, is a simple surgical procedure that can take place in the home or synagogue and marks the identification of a baby boy as a Jew. The ceremony is traditionally conducted by a mohel, a highly trained and skilled individual, although a rabbi in conjunction with a physician may perform the brit milah. The brit milah is a joyous occasion for the parents, relatives and friends who celebrate in this momentous event. At the brit milah, it is customary to appoint a kvater (a man) and a kvaterin (a woman), the equivalent of Jewish godparents, whose ritual role is to bring the child into the room for the circumcision. Another honor bestowed on a family member is the sandak, who is most often the baby’s paternal grandfather or great-grandfather. This individual traditionally holds the baby during the circumcision ceremony. The service involves a kiddush (prayer over wine), the circumcision, blessings, a dvar torah (a small teaching of the Torah) and the presentation of the Jewish name selected for the baby. During the brit milah, a chair is set aside for Elijah the prophet. Following the ceremony, a seudat mitzvah (celebratory meal) is available for the guests. Please take note: Formal invitations for a bris are not sent out. Typically, guests are notified by phone or email. The baby’s name is not given before the bris.
    [Show full text]
  • Team of Experts Sexual Violence in Conflict Rule of Law/Sexual Violence in Conflict
    office of the special representative of the secretary-general on Team of Experts sexual violence in conflict Rule of Law/Sexual Violence in Conflict report & recommendations Workshop on Sexual Violence against Men and Boys in Conflict Situations New York 25-26 July 2013 C O N T E N T S Executive Summary 5 1. Overview of Sexual Violence in Conflict as a Women, Peace & Security Issue 7 Conceptual, Political and Statistical Challenges to Introducing Men & Boys into the SGBV domain 8 Understandings & Assumptions about Gender 8 Blurring of ‘Gender’, ‘Women’ and SGBV 8 Under-reporting, Under-documenting, and Under-Acknowledging 9 Institutional Gaps in Applying the SGBV Agenda to Include Men & Boys 9 Why this Workshop? 10 2. The Scope of Sexual Violence against Men & Boys in Conflict 11 Men and Boys as Victims 11 Forms of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence 11 Spaces where Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurs 12 Recognising the Post-Conflict Dimension 12 acknowledgements The Logics of Sexual Violence against Men & Boys 12 The Perpetrators of Sexual Violence against Men & Boys 13 this report draws on the presentations given and the discussions held during the workshop, copies of which can be found at: 3. Impacts and Consequences of Conflict-Related Sexual Violence – the Five ‘P’s 13 http://www.slideshare.net/osrsgsvc/presentations. Comparing Conflict-Related Sexual Violence against Men & Boys with Sexual Violence against Women & Girls 14 the workshop was made possible by the concerted action of the office Comparing Conflict-Related Sexual Violence against Men & Boys with Sexual abuse in Peace-Time 14 of the special representative of the secretary-general on sexual violence in conflict, and the us state department.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S
    Guidelines on Paediatric Urology S. Tekgül (Chair), H.S. Dogan, E. Erdem (Guidelines Associate), P. Hoebeke, R. Ko˘cvara, J.M. Nijman (Vice-chair), C. Radmayr, M.S. Silay (Guidelines Associate), R. Stein, S. Undre (Guidelines Associate) European Society for Paediatric Urology © European Association of Urology 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Aim 7 1.2 Publication history 7 2. METHODS 8 3. THE GUIDELINE 8 3A PHIMOSIS 8 3A.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 8 3A.2 Classification systems 8 3A.3 Diagnostic evaluation 8 3A.4 Disease management 8 3A.5 Follow-up 9 3A.6 Conclusions and recommendations on phimosis 9 3B CRYPTORCHIDISM 9 3B.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 9 3B.2 Classification systems 9 3B.3 Diagnostic evaluation 10 3B.4 Disease management 10 3B.4.1 Medical therapy 10 3B.4.2 Surgery 10 3B.5 Follow-up 11 3B.6 Recommendations for cryptorchidism 11 3C HYDROCELE 12 3C.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 12 3C.2 Diagnostic evaluation 12 3C.3 Disease management 12 3C.4 Recommendations for the management of hydrocele 12 3D ACUTE SCROTUM IN CHILDREN 13 3D.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology 13 3D.2 Diagnostic evaluation 13 3D.3 Disease management 14 3D.3.1 Epididymitis 14 3D.3.2 Testicular torsion 14 3D.3.3 Surgical treatment 14 3D.4 Follow-up 14 3D.4.1 Fertility 14 3D.4.2 Subfertility 14 3D.4.3 Androgen levels 15 3D.4.4 Testicular cancer 15 3D.5 Recommendations for the treatment of acute scrotum in children 15 3E HYPOSPADIAS 15 3E.1 Epidemiology, aetiology and pathophysiology
    [Show full text]
  • IS CIRCUMCISION a FRAUD? FRAUD? a IS CIRCUMCISION Peter W
    cjp_30-1_42664 Sheet No. 27 Side A 11/12/2020 09:05:36 \\jciprod01\productn\C\CJP\30-1\CJP102.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-NOV-20 14:50 IS CIRCUMCISION A FRAUD? Peter W. Adler, Robert Van Howe, Travis Wisdom & Felix Daase* This Article suggests that non-therapeutic male circumcision or male genital cutting (MGC), the irreversible removal of the foreskin from the penises of healthy boys, is not only unlawful in the United States but also fraudulent. As a German court held in 2012 before its ruling was effectively overturned by a special statute under political pressure, cir- cumcision for religious or non-medical reasons is harmful, violates the child’s rights to bodily integrity and self-determination (which super- sedes competing parental rights), and constitutes criminal assault. MGC also violates the child’s rights under U.S. law, and it constitutes a bat- tery, a tort and a crime, and statutory child abuse. Building upon a 2016 case in the United Kingdom, we make the novel suggestion that when performed by a physician, MGC is a breach of trust or fiduciary duty, and hence constructive fraud, where courts impute fraud even if intent to defraud is absent. We reprise and build upon the argument that it is unlawful and Medicaid fraud for physicians and hospitals to bill Medi- caid for unnecessary genital surgery. Finally, we suggest that MGC con- stitutes intentional fraud by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and most physicians who perform circumcisions in the United States. They have long portrayed MGC as medicine when it is violence, and as a parental right when males have the right to keep their penile foreskin, and physicians are not allowed to take orders from parents to perform cjp_30-1_42664 Sheet No.
    [Show full text]
  • Male Circumcision and Virginity Testing of Girls) and the Legal Rights of Children
    HARMFUL TRADITIONAL PRACTICES, (MALE CIRCUMCISION AND VIRGINITY TESTING OF GIRLS) AND THE LEGAL RIGHTS OF CHILDREN. LUCINDA LE ROUX A mini-thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Magister Legum in the Faculty of Law, University of the Western Cape. Supervisor: Professor Julia Sloth-Nielsen. November 2006 2 ABSTRACT In South Africa the practice of virginity testing is most prevalent in KwaZulu- Natal amongst the Zulu and Xhosa. Proponents of the practice claim that some of the benefits include the prevention of the spread of HIV/Aids as well as teenage pregnancy and the detection of children who are sexually abused by adults, amongst others. In South Africa most black males undergo an initiation when they are approximately 16 years old to mark the transition from boyhood to manhood. Male circumcision is also performed as a religious practice amongst the Jews and Muslims. A number of human rights groups in South Africa, including the Commission on Gender Equality (CGE) as well as the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC) has called for a total ban on the practice of virginity testing on the basis that it discriminates against girls, as the practice is carried out predominantly amongst teenage girls. The CGE and SAHRC are particularly concerned about the potential for human rights violations of virginity testing. The problem with traditional male circumcisions in South Africa is the number of fatalities resulting from botched circumcisions and the spreading of sexually transmitted diseases through unhygienic procedures and unqualified surgeons. Also of concern are other hardships often accompanied by traditional circumcisions such as starvation, frostbite, gangrene and infection amongst other health related injuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Foreskin the Foreskin Is Not an Optional Extra for a Man’S Body, Or an Accident
    The Human Foreskin The foreskin is not an optional extra for a man’s body, or an accident. It is an integral, functioning, important component of a man’s penis. An eye does not function properly without an eyelid – and nor does a penis without its foreskin. Among other things, the foreskin provides: Protection The foreskin fully covers the glans (head) of the flaccid penis, thereby protecting it from damage and harsh rubbing against abrasive agents (underwear, etc.) and maintaining its sensitivity Sexual Sensitivity The foreskin provides direct sexual pleasure in its own right, as it contains the highest concentration of nerve endings on the penis Lubrication The foreskin, with its unique mucous membrane, permanently lubricates the glans, thus improving sensitivity and aiding smoother intercourse Skin-Gliding During Erection The foreskin facilitates the gliding movement of the skin of the penis up and down the penile shaft and over the glans during erection and sexual activity Varied Sexual Sensation The foreskin facilitates direct stimulation of the glans during sexual activity by its interactive contact with the sensitive glans Immunological Defense The foreskin helps clean and protect the glans via the secretion of anti-bacterial agents What circumcision takes away The foreskin is at the heart of male sexuality. Circumcision almost always results in a diminution of sexual sensitivity; largely because removing the foreskin cuts away the most nerve-rich part of the penis (up to 80% of the penis’s nerve endings reside in the foreskin) [1]. The following anatomy is amputated with circumcision: The Taylor “ridged band” (sometimes called the “frenar band”), the primary erogenous zone of the male body.
    [Show full text]
  • Fearful Symmetries: Essays and Testimonies Around Excision and Circumcision. Rodopi
    Fearful Symmetries Matatu Journal for African Culture and Society ————————————]^——————————— EDITORIAL BOARD Gordon Collier Christine Matzke Frank Schulze–Engler Geoffrey V. Davis Aderemi Raji–Oyelade Chantal Zabus †Ezenwa–Ohaeto TECHNICAL AND CARIBBEAN EDITOR Gordon Collier ———————————— ]^ ——————————— BOARD OF ADVISORS Anne V. Adams (Ithaca NY) Jürgen Martini (Magdeburg, Germany) Eckhard Breitinger (Bayreuth, Germany) Henning Melber (Windhoek, Namibia) Margaret J. Daymond (Durban, South Africa) Amadou Booker Sadji (Dakar, Senegal) Anne Fuchs (Nice, France) Reinhard Sander (San Juan, Puerto Rico) James Gibbs (Bristol, England) John A. Stotesbury (Joensuu, Finland) Johan U. Jacobs (Durban, South Africa) Peter O. Stummer (Munich, Germany) Jürgen Jansen (Aachen, Germany) Ahmed Yerma (Lagos, Nigeria)i — Founding Editor: Holger G. Ehling — ]^ Matatu is a journal on African and African diaspora literatures and societies dedicated to interdisciplinary dialogue between literary and cultural studies, historiography, the social sciences and cultural anthropology. ]^ Matatu is animated by a lively interest in African culture and literature (including the Afro- Caribbean) that moves beyond worn-out clichés of ‘cultural authenticity’ and ‘national liberation’ towards critical exploration of African modernities. The East African public transport vehicle from which Matatu takes its name is both a component and a symbol of these modernities: based on ‘Western’ (these days usually Japanese) technology, it is a vigorously African institution; it is usually
    [Show full text]
  • Thromboprophylaxis in Urological Surgery
    EAU Guidelines on Thromboprophylaxis in Urological Surgery K.A.O. Tikkinen (Chair), R. Cartwright, M.K. Gould, R. Naspro, G. Novara, P.M. Sandset, P. D . Violette, G.H. Guyatt © European Association of Urology 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 3 1.1 Aims and objectives 3 1.2 Panel composition 3 1.3 Available publications 3 1.4 Publication history 3 2. METHODS 3 2.1 Guideline methodology 3 3. GUIDELINE 4 3.1 Thromboprophylaxis post-surgery 4 3.1.1 Introduction 4 3.1.2 Outcomes and definitions 4 3.1.3 Timing and duration of thromboprophylaxis 4 3.1.4 Basic principles for recommending (or not recommending) post-surgery thromboprophylaxis 5 3.1.4.1 Effect of prophylaxis on key outcomes 5 3.1.4.2 Baseline risk of key outcomes 5 3.1.4.3 Patient-related risk (and protective) factors 5 3.1.4.4 From evidence to recommendations 6 3.1.5 General statements for all procedure-specific recommendations 7 3.1.6 Recommendations 7 3.2 Peri-operative management of antithrombotic agents in urology 14 3.2.1 Introduction 14 3.2.2 Evidence summary 14 3.2.3 Recommendations 14 4. RESEARCH RECOMMENDATIONS 16 5. REFERENCES 16 6. CONFLICT OF INTEREST 18 7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 18 8. CITATION INFORMATION 18 2 THROMBOPROPHYLAXIS - MARCH 2017 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Aims and objectives Due to the hypercoagulable state induced by surgery, serious complications of urological surgery include deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) - together referred to as venous thromboembolism (VTE) - and major bleeding [1-4].
    [Show full text]
  • CIRCUMCISION and the LGBTI Community
    Gender Equality Demands that the Bodily Integrity, Autonomy, and Rights of ALL Children be Equally Protected Female genital cutting in the US and other nations has been outlawed, leaving other children without such protections. If we in the LGBTI community truly believe in gender equality, we must become advocates for ALL children, and promote policies and laws that protect their autonomy regarding bodily integrity. Otherwise, such inequities expose our own cultural chauvinism against “barbaric” cultural practices of others and ignore our own practices that outsiders consider barbaric. All forced genital cutting of children shares anti-sexual histories and excuses. The US medical practice of male (and female) circumcision is rooted in anti-sexual Victorian-era paranoia over masturbation and fears about children’s sexuality. It’s pointless to argue about competitive suffering based on gender. All children deserve an open future that respects their bodies, their sexuality, and their human rights. This goal is consistent with the principles of the LGBTI movement. ⦿ ⦿ ⦿ ⦿ ⦿ This brochure was authored by Tim Hammond, openly gay producer of the documentary, Whose Body, Whose Rights?, founder of NOHARMM, co-founder of the National Organization of Restoring Men, and survey programmer for the Global Survey of Circumcision Harm. Attorneys for the Rights of the Child ARCLaw.org Seeks to secure equal protection for, and broaden public and legal recognition of, children’s legal and human rights to bodily integrity and self-determination that are violated by unnecessary genital cutting of male, female and intersex children. Doctors Opposing Circumcision DoctorsOpposingCircumcision.org An international network of physicians dedicated to protecting the genital integrity and eventual autonomy of all children, serving both health professionals and the public through education, support, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Circumcision Decision
    The Circumcision Decision Circumcision is a surgical procedure in which the skin covering the end of the penis is removed. Scientific studies show a number of medical benefits to circumcision. Parents may also want their son circumcised for religious, social or cultural reasons. Because circumcision is not essential to a child’s health, parents should choose what is best for their child by looking at the benefits, the risks and discussing it with their pediatrician. The following are answers to common questions about circumcision. What Is Circumcision? What Should I Expect For My Son After Circumcision? At birth, boys have skin that covers the end of the penis, called the foreskin. After the circumcision, the tip of the penis Circumcision surgically removes the may seem raw or yellowish. The diaper foreskin, exposing the tip of the penis. should be applied loosely and changed Circumcision is usually performed by a frequently for the first few days. This doctor in the first few days of life. An will help prevent possible infection and infant must be stable and healthy to safely keep the penis from becoming irritated. be circumcised. Petroleum jelly may be used to keep the healing penis from sticking to the Because circumcision may be more risky diaper. Surgical gauze is often applied if done later in life, parents should decide after completion of the circumcision to before or soon after their son is born if prevent bleeding. The gauze will fall off they want it done. on its own in a few days. The penis should be fully healed in about 7-10 days after Is Circumcision Painful? circumcision.
    [Show full text]
  • RELATIVE VALUE UNITS (RVUS) and RELATED INFORMATION—Continued
    Federal Register / Vol. 68, No. 158 / Friday, August 15, 2003 / Proposed Rules 49129 ADDENDUM B.—RELATIVE VALUE UNITS (RVUS) AND RELATED INFORMATION—Continued Physician Non- Mal- Non- 1 CPT/ Facility Facility 2 MOD Status Description work facility PE practice acility Global HCPCS RVUs RVUs PE RVUs RVUs total total 42720 ....... ........... A Drainage of throat ab- 5.42 5.24 3.93 0.39 11.05 9.74 010 scess. 42725 ....... ........... A Drainage of throat ab- 10.72 N/A 8.26 0.80 N/A 19.78 090 scess. 42800 ....... ........... A Biopsy of throat ................ 1.39 2.35 1.45 0.10 3.84 2.94 010 42802 ....... ........... A Biopsy of throat ................ 1.54 3.17 1.62 0.11 4.82 3.27 010 42804 ....... ........... A Biopsy of upper nose/ 1.24 3.16 1.54 0.09 4.49 2.87 010 throat. 42806 ....... ........... A Biopsy of upper nose/ 1.58 3.17 1.66 0.12 4.87 3.36 010 throat. 42808 ....... ........... A Excise pharynx lesion ...... 2.30 3.31 1.99 0.17 5.78 4.46 010 42809 ....... ........... A Remove pharynx foreign 1.81 2.46 1.40 0.13 4.40 3.34 010 body. 42810 ....... ........... A Excision of neck cyst ........ 3.25 5.05 3.53 0.25 8.55 7.03 090 42815 ....... ........... A Excision of neck cyst ........ 7.07 N/A 5.63 0.53 N/A 13.23 090 42820 ....... ........... A Remove tonsils and ade- 3.91 N/A 3.63 0.28 N/A 7.82 090 noids.
    [Show full text]