Rome and Imperialism

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rome and Imperialism 1 Rome and Imperialism expansion, so as to avoid importing con- 2 notations of competing hegemonies led by 3 modernising nation states (Veyne 1975): 4 those who follow Lenin’s notion of impe- 5 Rome in the history of rialism as a distinct stage of capitalism 6 imperialism (1934) would also have to reject the label as 7 Rome has long occupied a central place in it applied to Rome. 8 the theorisation of empire. One reason is that In practice it is not feasible to dispense with 9 imperial symbols and language – eagles, fas- the labels ‘empire’ and ‘imperialism’, as simi- 10 ces, laurel wreaths, and the Latin titulature of lar problems face any alternative terminol- 11 empire – have been repeatedly appropriated ogy. The most thoughtful recent approaches 12 in the Western tradition by expanding powers treat Rome as one of number of similar 13 and states. The Frankish King Charlemagne political entities often termed early empires. 14 had himself crowned emperor by the Pope Depending on the focus of the analysis 15 in Rome in 800. The title Kaisar (Caesar) was these are often qualified as tributary empires 16 used by the rulers of successive German (in relation to their political economy) or 17 emperors in the Middle Ages, and Czar by pre-capitalist or pre-industrial if their eco- 18 various Eastern European powers up to and nomic life or technology seems more impor- 19 including the rulers of Russia. Medieval tant. Broadly similar to Rome would be the 20 appropriations related as much to the contem- sequence of Chinese empires that began in 21 porary presence of the emperors of Byzantium 221 BCE with the creation of the Qin dynasty, 22 (who continued to be Caesars and to rule a a series of empires based on the Iranian pla- 23 Roman Empire into the 15th century) as to any teau including those of the Achaemenid, 24 close connection with earlier periods. But the Parthian, and Sassanian dynasties, prob- 25 increased interest in the classical past across ably the Neo-Assyrian Empire that controlled 26 Europe from the early modern period meant Mesopotamia and surrounding states in the 27 that Rome was repeatedly a mode. After the first half of the last millennium BCE, a series 28 French Revolution and Napoleon’s abolition of empiresONLY based on the Indo-Gangetic plain 29 of the Holy Roman (German) Empire, Roman beginning with the Maurya dynasty of 322– 30 titulature was adopted by French, Austrian, 185 BCE, the larger Macedonian-ruled king- 31 and British rulers. Many titles and symbols of doms that divided the territory of the former 32 Roman origin remained current until the mid- Achaemenid Empire in roughly the same 33 dle of the 20th century. period, and a series of much later New World 34 That reception history has been a mixed empires including those of the Aztec and 35 blessing for the study of ancient Rome the Inka. Each of these represented a system 36 (Harrison 2008). While it has meant that Rome of political domination created by one peo- 37 has received much closer attention than many ple through the conquest and intimidation 38 other early empires – such as Achaemenid of a number of other peoples and often by 39 Persia, the Hellenistic kingdoms of the the absorption of a number of earlier states. 40 Abbasid Caliphate – the repeated comparisons Typically they were sustained by exactions of 41 have introduced many anachronisms. Among labour (military and other), of agricultural 42 these have been debates over the economic produce, and of metals, and typically much 43 motors and costs of Roman imperialism, of this was spent on rewarding various privi- 44 and over its civilising or brutalising effects. leged populations or classes and supporting 45 To some extent this remains the case in con- military forces. Most of these entities invested 46 temporary comparisons between Rome and in infrastructure – roads, canals, fortifica- 47 America and even with post-colonial interpre- tions, storehouses, and ports – and in cer- 48 tations of ancient Rome, which sometimes emonial and monuments. Almost all were 49 seem tinged with post-colonial guilt. The best ruled by autocrats. Most (with the exception 50 comparisons have in fact repeatedly drawn out of the New World examples) had iron metal- 51 PROOFcontrasts between ancient Roman and mod- lurgy; most used writing and had imperial 52 ern European imperialism, and exposed the systems of weights and measures. None had 53 ideological component of claims to the con- any source of energy beyond human and ani- 54 trary (Brunt 1965; Malamud 2009). It has even mal labour, and none had any system of com- 55 been suggested that we should not employ munications faster than a sailing vessel or a 56 the term ‘imperialism’ to describe Roman relay of riders or runners could provide. © Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited. Any reuse requests to be sent to [email protected] cha100.indd 1 06-10-2015 10:32:49 2 Rome and Imperialism 1 There is disagreement on the most appro- immediate neighbours. During the fourth 2 priate boundaries of this analytical category. century BCE Rome first defeated the larg- 3 Some scholars would include some of the est of the cities of southern Etruria, Veii, 4 earlier and generally smaller expansionist and then extended its control over its Latin- 5 states of the Bronze Age Near East, includ- speaking neighbours and the hill tribes of 6 ing New Kingdom Egypt, and analogous central Italy. Wars fought almost every year, 7 states in Central and South America like that supported by contingents from its defeated 8 of Wari, and some would include the short- ‘allies’, extended a hegemony over most of 9 lived hegemonies exercised by powerful city Italy south of the Apennines, although this 10 states over their neighbours in city state civi- was not expressed in regular extraction of 11 lisations (see Hansen 2000, 2002). Whether tribute, and most of the cities and people 12 medieval and early modern empires were of the peninsula remained autonomous even 13 essentially similar is also debated. A num- if they had lost effective control of their for- 14 ber of recent synoptic studies deal with these eign relations. A demonstration of the resil- 15 questions (Alcock et al. 2001; Bang and Bayly ience of Roman control came in 280–275 BCE 16 2003, 2011; Morris and Scheidel 2009). Some when Tarentum, one of the largest Greek cit- 17 of these draw on historical sociologies of ies of southern Italy, persuaded Pyrrhus, King 18 empire (Doyle 1986; Eisenstadt 1963; Hardt of Epirus, to cross the Adriatic and challenge 19 and Negri 2000; Kautsky 1982). Despite these Rome. Although successful in several battles, 20 disagreements over the proper limits of com- Pyrrhus was unable to establish a power base, 21 parison, consideration of at least some other and his retreat in effect solidified Roman con- 22 early empires provides a useful perspective on trol of Italy. This was also the period in which 23 Roman imperialism. In particular, compara- Greek writers noticed the rise of Rome, and 24 tive analysis often reveals what was unique from this point on a more precise and accu- 25 or unusual in the solutions Romans adopted rate kind of history can be written. 26 to problems that were widely faced by early The Mediterranean world in the third and 27 imperial powers, such as peripheral revolts, second centuries BCE was dominated by a 28 the integration of minorities, or the formida- small numberONLY of political hegemonies. In 29 ble limitations on long-distance communica- the east the Achaemenid Empire conquered 30 tions before the industrial revolution. by Alexander the Great had been divided 31 between three large kingdoms – Seleukid 32 Syria, Ptolemaic Egypt, and Antigonid 33 The phases of Roman Macedon – and a number of smaller states 34 expansion that aspired to the same status, among 35 The full story of the growth, stabilisation, them the kingdoms of Bithynia, Pontus, and 36 and collapse of Roman political domina- Pergamum in Asia Minor and that of Epirus in 37 tion can only be sketched out here (see the Balkans. Between and around them were 38 Champion 2004; Nicolet 1977; Woolf 2012). cities, leagues of cities, and tribal peoples like 39 Roman tradition dated the foundation of the the Thracians, variously allies, suppliers of 40 city to the middle of the eighth century BCE, mercenaries, and victims of the wars between 41 and archaeological research suggests that the Great Powers. Some cities, like Cyrene, 42 the site of Rome was at least occupied by that Corinth, Athens, and Rhodes, were larger 43 point. The institutions of a city state emerged players than others. West of the Adriatic 44 around the seventh and sixth centuries BCE, Rome had only one serious rival, the city of 45 probably a little later than in Etruria (Tuscany) Carthage close to modern Tunis, which exer- 46 just to the north or in the areas to the south cised a loose control over other Phoenician 47 where Greek cities were created. During the foundations in north Africa, western Sicily 48 first half of the last millennium BCE, urban and southern Spain. Sardinia and Corsica, 49 settlements and archaic states were created the remainder of Mediterranean Spain, and 50 all around the Mediterranean and Black Seas. most of southern France outside the small 51 PROOFBy the fifth century BCE some larger states – area controlled by the Greek city of Marseilles 52 Athens, Sparta, Syracuse, and Carthage are and her colonies were settled by tribal peo- 53 the most famous – were coming to dominate ples with little resembling cities or states.
Recommended publications
  • Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: a Meaningful Distinction?
    Comparative Studies in Society and History 2021;63(2):280–309. 0010-4175/21 © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Society for the Comparative Study of Society and History doi:10.1017/S0010417521000050 Colony and Empire, Colonialism and Imperialism: A Meaningful Distinction? KRISHAN KUMAR University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA It is a mistaken notion that planting of colonies and extending of Empire are necessarily one and the same thing. ———Major John Cartwright, Ten Letters to the Public Advertiser, 20 March–14 April 1774 (in Koebner 1961: 200). There are two ways to conquer a country; the first is to subordinate the inhabitants and govern them directly or indirectly.… The second is to replace the former inhabitants with the conquering race. ———Alexis de Tocqueville (2001[1841]: 61). One can instinctively think of neo-colonialism but there is no such thing as neo-settler colonialism. ———Lorenzo Veracini (2010: 100). WHAT’ S IN A NAME? It is rare in popular usage to distinguish between imperialism and colonialism. They are treated for most intents and purposes as synonyms. The same is true of many scholarly accounts, which move freely between imperialism and colonialism without apparently feeling any discomfort or need to explain themselves. So, for instance, Dane Kennedy defines colonialism as “the imposition by foreign power of direct rule over another people” (2016: 1), which for most people would do very well as a definition of empire, or imperialism. Moreover, he comments that “decolonization did not necessarily Acknowledgments: This paper is a much-revised version of a presentation given many years ago at a seminar on empires organized by Patricia Crone, at the Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism: Materiality and Ideology
    Sample chapter from: Mario Liverani, Assyria: e Imperial Mission http://www.eisenbrauns.com/item/LIVASSYRI © Copyright 2017 Eisenbrauns. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Imperialism: Materiality and Ideology It is first of all necessary, or at least convenient, to clarify what is meant by “em- pire”; such a clarification is in turn the basis upon which an analysis of imperialism, or imperial ideology, can proceed. The definition of empire has always been subject to debate, 1 and I hereby limit myself to two traditional definitions. The first is that of John Gilissen: 2 “un état souverain, un territoire relativement vaste, de multiples groupes socio-politiques, une certaine durée, la concentration du pouvoir entre les mains d’une même autorité, généralement monocratique, la tendance à l’hégémonie, voire à l’universalisation.” The second is that of Michael Doyle: 3 “Empire is a rela- tionship, formal or informal, in which one state controls the effective sovereignty of another political society. It can be achieved by force, by political collaboration, by economic, social, or cultural dependence. Imperialism is simply the process of es- tablishing or maintaining an empire.” The first definition includes—and the second omits—what is to my mind the essential prerequisite for any consideration of empire, namely the ideological principle, the “imperial mission”: imperialism as the mission to subjugate, or at least to impose hegemony over, the entirety of the known world. 4 Unfortunately, two opposed but equally superficial tendencies prevail in the com- pilation of lists of empires—one tendency applies the “empire” label widely, while the other restricts its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaelic Homepage, ***Also*** Who Were the Celts?
    Gaelic Homepage, Click here for a web site devoted to the language and culture of the Gaels, Gaelic and Gaelic Culture. ***Also*** BEGINNERS' BLAS, Learning Irish Who were the Celts? The Celts were a group of peoples that occupied lands stretching from the British Isles to Gallatia. The Celts had many dealings with other cultures that bordered the lands occupied by these peoples, and even though there is no written record of the Celts stemming from their own documents, we can piece together a fair picture of them from archeological evidence as well as historical accounts from other cultures. The first historical recorded encounter of a people displaying the cultural traits associated with the Celts comes from northern Italy around 400 BC, when a previously unkown group of barbarians came down from the Alps and displaced the Etruscans from the fertile Po valley, a displacment that helped to push the Etruscans from history's limelight. The next encounter with the Celts came with the still young Roman Empire, directly to the south of the Po. The Romans in fact had sent three envoys to the beseiged Etruscans to study this new force. We know from Livy's The Early History of Rome that this first encounter with Rome was quite civilized: [The Celts told the Roman envoys that] this was indeed the first time they had heard of them, but they assumed the Romans must be a courageous people because it was to them that the [Etruscans] had turned to in their hour of need. And since the Romans had tried to help with an embassy and not with arms, they themselves would not reject the offer of peace, provided the [Etruscans] ceded part of their seperfluous agricultural land; that was what they, the Celts, wanted...
    [Show full text]
  • A Cape of Asia: Essays on European History
    A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 1 a cape of asia A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 2 A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 3 A Cape of Asia essays on european history Henk Wesseling leiden university press A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 4 Cover design and lay-out: Sander Pinkse Boekproductie, Amsterdam isbn 978 90 8728 128 1 e-isbn 978 94 0060 0461 nur 680 / 686 © H. Wesseling / Leiden University Press, 2011 All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this book may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise) without the written permission of both the copyright owner and the author of the book. A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 5 Europe is a small cape of Asia paul valéry A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 6 For Arnold Burgen A Cape of Asia.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 10-10-11 / 11:44 | Pag. 7 Contents Preface and Introduction 9 europe and the wider world Globalization: A Historical Perspective 17 Rich and Poor: Early and Later 23 The Expansion of Europe and the Development of Science and Technology 28 Imperialism 35 Changing Views on Empire and Imperialism 46 Some Reflections on the History of the Partition
    [Show full text]
  • World Geography: Unit 6
    World Geography: Unit 6 How did the colonization of Africa shape its political and cultural geography? This instructional task engages students in content related to the following grade-level expectations: • WG.1.4 Use geographic representations to locate the world’s continents, major landforms, major bodies of water and major countries and to solve geographic problems • WG.3.1 Analyze how cooperation, conflict, and self-interest impact the cultural, political, and economic regions of the world and relations between nations Content • WG.4.3 Identify and analyze distinguishing human characteristics of a given place to determine their influence on historical events • WG.4.4 Evaluate the impact of historical events on culture and relationships among groups • WG.6.3 Analyze the distribution of resources and describe their impact on human systems (past, present, and future) In this instructional task, students develop and express claims through discussions and writing which Claims examine the effect of colonization on African development. This instructional task helps students explore and develop claims around the content from unit 6: Unit Connection • How does the history of colonization continue to affect the economic and social aspects of African countries today? (WG.1.4, WG.3.1, WG.4.3, WG.4.4, WG.6.3) Formative Formative Formative Formative Performance Task 1 Performance Task 2 Performance Task 3 Performance Task 4 How and why did the How did European What perspectives exist How did colonization Supporting Questions colonization of Africa countries politically on the colonization of impact Africa? begin? divide Africa? Africa? Students will analyze Students will explore Students will analyze Students will examine the origins of the European countries political cartoons on the lingering effects of Tasks colonization in Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism Tate Britain: Colonialism Tate Britain Has Over 500 Pieces of Art That Are Related to British Colonialism. There Ar
    Imperialism Tate Britain: Colonialism Tate Britain has over 500 pieces of art that are related to British Colonialism. There are portraits, propaganda and photographs. Mutiny at the Margin: The Indian Uprising of 1857 2007 saw the 150th Anniversary of the Indian Uprising (also known as the ‘Mutiny') of 1857-58. One of the best-known episodes of both British imperial and South Asian history and a seminal event for Anglo-Indian relations, 1857 has yet to be the subject of a substantial revisionist history British Postal Museum and Archive: British Empire Exhibition Great Britain’s first commemorative stamps were issued on 23 April 1924 – this marked the first day of the British Empire Exhibition at Wembley. British Cartoon Archive: British Empire The British Cartoon Archive has a collection of 280 contemporary cartoons that are related to the British Empire. The Word on the Street: Emigration This contains a collection of 44 ballads that are related to British emigration during the 1800/1900’s. British Pathe: Empire British Pathe has a collection of contemporary newsreels that are related to the empire. Included, for example, is footage from Empire Day celebration in 1933. The British Library: Asians in Britain These webpages trace the long history of Asians in Britain, focusing on the period 1858-1950. They explore the subject through contemporary accounts, posters, pamphlets, diaries, newspapers, political reports and illustrations, all evidence of the diverse and rich contributions Asians have made to British life. The National Archives: British Empire The National Archives has an exhibition that analyses the growth of the British Empire.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Were the Celts?
    Who were the Celts? The Celts were a group of peoples that occupied lands stretching from the British Isles to Galatia. The Celts had many dealings with other cultures that bordered the lands occupied by these peoples, and even though there is no written record of the Celts stemming from their own documents, we can piece together a fair picture of them from archeological evidence as well as historical accounts from other cultures. The first historical recorded encounter of a people displaying the cultural traits associated with the Celts comes from northern Italy around 400 BC, when a previously unknown group of barbarians came down from the Alps and displaced the Etruscans from the fertile Po valley, a displacement that helped to push the Etruscans from history's limelight. The next encounter with the Celts came with the still young Roman Empire, directly to the south of the Po. The Romans in fact had sent three envoys to the besieged Etruscans to study this new force. We know from Livy's The Early History of Rome that this first encounter with Rome was quite civilized: “[The Celts told the Roman envoys that] this was indeed the first time they had heard of them, but they assumed the Romans must be a courageous people because it was to them that the [Etruscans] had turned to in their hour of need. And since the Romans had tried to help with an embassy and not with arms, they themselves would not reject the offer of peace, provided the [Etruscans] ceded part of their superfluous agricultural land; that was what they, the Celts, wanted...
    [Show full text]
  • Stamatov Office Hours: Monday, 1-3 Pm Phone: 432-6562 Email: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Sandy Zhao, [email protected]
    Sociology 306a/553a, EPE 337a: Empires and Imperialism Monday 3:30-5:20 pm 493 College Street, Room 208 Instructor: Peter Stamatov Office hours: Monday, 1-3 pm Phone: 432-6562 Email: [email protected] Teaching Fellow: Sandy Zhao, [email protected] Today, we live in a world of nation states, a world in which each nation has—or aspires to have—its “own” state. Yet this global dominance of the idea of the nation state is of relatively recent provenance. For the most of human history, political power has been organized in forms more complex than the simple formula “one nation/one state.” In this course, we will discuss empires, the institutional manifestation of this complex organization of political power. Empire, imperialism, colonialism and postcolonialism are concepts frequently evoked in public and academic discourse, mainly to refer to the period of European overseas expansion from the fifteenth century on. One aim of this course is to place this European imperialism and its consequences in a larger comparative context. We will do so by considering the historical predecessors of modern European imperialism in Antiquity and in the Middle Ages, as well as “contemporaries” of European empires in other parts of the world. With this foundation, in the second half of the course we will discuss and evaluate representative works drawn from the rich literature on modern imperialism and colonialism. Requirements and Readings 1) Regular attendance, careful reading of the assigned texts, and engaged participation in class. 2) Abstention from laptop use. While laptops are an indispensable productivity tool, their use in the class room creates a sterile atmosphere with everyone glued to their screen instead of engaging with the discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism and Colonialism
    Colonialism and Imperialism Juan Carlos Ocaña Aybar [4º ESO] Geography and History – Bilingual Studies – IES Parque de Lisboa, Alcorcón (Madrid) 1 Colonialism and Imperialism 1. Colonialism The Historical Context From 1870 a series of great economic changes in advanced capitalist powers (“Second industrial revolution”) brought a wave of new technologies that radically transformed the economy of the most advanced countries. Cheaper transportation and communication allowed people to travel throughout the world in a way and in a quantity hitherto inconceivable. This process of global integration has been called the first globalization. In this context we should understand the phenomenon of colonialism or imperialism. Both terms are used interchangeably to refer to the territorial expansion of the European industrial powers, especially after 1870. The result of this expansion was the formation of large overseas empires. The Causes of Colonial Expansion The colonial and imperialist expansion undertaken by the industrial powers from 1870- 1914 was motivated by several factors: Economic factors (raw materials, new markets to sell and buy, valve for population pressure in the metropolis) Political factors (national prestige, lobby groups interested in colonization, action of highly influential politicians) Geostrategic factors (geographic privileged enclaves) Cultural and scientific factors (thirst for knowledge, extension of Western culture) Causes of Colonialism When asked about the causes of the European imperial expansion in the late nineteenth century, historians have traditionally highlighted economic causes. Capitalist development led European powers to seek new spaces in which they could obtain: Raw materials to supply its industries (textile fibers, minerals…). 4º ESO – Colonialism and Imperialism 2 Markets to sell their products.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendario Romanistico (Ultimo Aggiornamento : 19 Novembre 2016)
    Calendario romanistico (ultimo aggiornamento : 19 novembre 2016) A cura di Enrico Sciandrello 03.12.2016 Bologna “L’intelligenza della storia. Seminario per Aldo Schiavone”: interventi di Maria Cecilia d’Ercole (Il “mestiere dello storico”), Jean-Louis Ferrary (Antichistica e storiografia giuridica), Massimo Brutti (La storia dei giuristi), Ernesto Galli della Loggia (Impegno politico e cultura nell’Italia contemporanea), Roberto Espo- sito (Filosofia e diritto romano). Palazzo Malvezzi, Sala delle Armi. 02.12.2016 Trento Letture romanistiche ELR: discussione del volume di Julia Gokel, ‘Sprachliche Indizien für inneres System bei Q. Cervidius Scaevola’ con Valerio Marotta. Università degli Studi di Trento, Facoltà di Giurisprudenza. 01-02.12.2016 Parma Per l’Associazione di Studi Tardoantichi Convegno su “Miseratio e perdono in età tardoantica: virtus o vitium? Prospettive storiche, giuridiche e sociali e realtà territoriale”: interventi (giovedì 1) di Adriaan Johan Boudewijn Sirks (Miseri- cordia nella Gallia del V e VI secolo), Elio Dovere (La remissio tributi nella Hi- storia di Evagrio sec. V), Serena Palma (La visione di miseratio e remissio in Cipriano), Laura Solidoro (Perdono e riabilitazione delle prostitute), Lucietta Di Paola (Alcune riflessioni sulla lenitas imperiale e sui suoi effetti in età tardoanti- ca), Ugo Criscuolo (Miseratio pauperum nel Tardoantico), Letteria De Salvo (Colpa e indulgenza [amartema e synchoresis]: lessico cristiano o burocratico? A proposito di Eus. VC 2. 24-42), Maria Elvira Consoli (Concezione e
    [Show full text]
  • Revisiting the Achievements of the Ancient Celts
    University of Louisville ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses College of Arts & Sciences 5-2013 Revisiting the achievements of the Ancient Celts : evidence that the Celtic civilization surpassed contemporary European civilizations in its technical sophistication and social complexity, and continues to influence later cultures. Adam Dahmer University of Louisville Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.louisville.edu/honors Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Dahmer, Adam, "Revisiting the achievements of the Ancient Celts : evidence that the Celtic civilization surpassed contemporary European civilizations in its technical sophistication and social complexity, and continues to influence later cultures." (2013). College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses. Paper 11. http://doi.org/10.18297/honors/11 This Senior Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in College of Arts & Sciences Senior Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ThinkIR: The University of Louisville's Institutional Repository. This title appears here courtesy of the author, who has retained all other copyrights. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Dahmer 1 A Lost Civilization as Great as Any Scholars traditionally associate the advancement of Western culture from antiquity to the Renaissance with the innovations of the Romans and their Mediterranean cultural predecessors, the Greeks and Etruscans, to the extent that the word "civilization" often seems synonymous with Romanization. In doing so, historians unfairly discount the cultural achievements of other Indo-European peoples who achieved civilization in their own right and contributed much to ancient and modern life.
    [Show full text]
  • Quod Omnium Nationum Exterarum Princeps Sicilia
    Quod omnium nationum exterarum princeps Sicilia A reappraisal of the socio-economic history of Sicily under the Roman Republic, 241-44 B.C. Master’s thesis Tom Grijspaardt 4012658 RMA Ancient, Medieval and Renaissance Studies Track: Ancient Studies Utrecht University Thesis presented: June 20th 2017 Supervisor: prof. dr. L.V. Rutgers Second reader: dr. R. Strootman Contents Introduction 4 Aims and Motivation 4 Structure 6 Chapter I: Establishing a methodological and interpretative framework 7 I.1. Historiography, problems and critical analysis 7 I.1a.The study of ancient economies 7 I.1b. The study of Republican Sicily 17 I.1c. Recent developments 19 I.2. Methodological framework 22 I.2a. Balance of the sources 22 I.2b. Re-embedding the economy 24 I.3. Interpretative framework 26 I.3a. Food and ideology 27 I.3b. Mechanisms of non-market exchange 29 I.3c. The plurality of ancient economies 32 I.4. Conclusion 38 Chapter II. Archaeology of the Economy 40 II.1. Preliminaries 40 II.1a. On survey archaeology 40 II.1b. Selection of case-studies 41 II.2. The Carthaginian West 43 II.2a. Segesta 43 II.2b. Iatas 45 II.2c. Heraclea Minoa 47 II.2d. Lilybaeum 50 II.3. The Greek East 53 II.3a. Centuripe 53 II.3b. Tyndaris 56 II.3c. Morgantina 60 II.3d. Halasea 61 II.4. Agriculture 64 II.4a. Climate and agricultural stability 64 II.4b. On crops and yields 67 II.4c. On productivity and animals 70 II.5. Non-agricultural production and commerce 72 II.6. Conclusion 74 Chapter III.
    [Show full text]