Twelfth Report of Session 2009-10

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Twelfth Report of Session 2009-10 House of Lords House of Commons Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Twelfth Report of Session 2009-10 Drawing special attention to: Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces (Amendment) etc. Regulations 2010 (Draft S.I.) Merchant Shipping and Fishing Vessels (Health and Safety at Work) (Chemical Agents) Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/330) Notification of Conventional Tower Cranes Regulations 2010 (S.I. 2010/333) Armed Forces (Redundancy, Resettlement and Gratuity Earnings Schemes) Order 2010 (S.I. 2010/345) Ordered by the House of Lords to be printed 24 March 2010 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 24 March 2010 HL Paper 105 HC 3-xii Published on 30 March 2010 by authority of the House of Lords and the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments Current membership House of Lords House of Commons Lord Campbell of Alloway (Conservative) David Maclean MP (Conservative, Penrith and The Border) (Chairman) Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) Dr Roberta Blackman-Woods MP (Labour, City of Durham) Baroness Jones of Whitchurch (Labour) Mr Peter Bone MP (Conservative, Wellingborough) Lord Kimball (Conservative) Mr Nigel Dodds MP (Democratic Unionist, Belfast North) Countess of Mar (Crossbench) Jeff Ennis MP (Labour, Barnsley East and Mexborough) Earl of Mar and Kellie (Liberal Democrat) Judy Mallaber MP (Labour, Amber Valley) Lord Walpole (Crossbench) Chris Ruane MP (Labour, Vale of Clwyd) Powers The full constitution and powers of the Committee are set out in House of Commons Standing Order No. 151 and House of Lords Standing Order No. 74, available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk/jcsi. Remit The Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments (JCSI) is appointed to consider statutory instruments made in exercise of powers granted by Act of Parliament. Instruments not laid before Parliament are included within the Committee's remit; but local instruments and instruments made by devolved administrations are not considered by JCSI unless they are required to be laid before Parliament. The role of the JCSI, whose membership is drawn from both Houses of Parliament, is to assess the technical qualities of each instrument that falls within its remit and to decide whether to draw the special attention of each House to any instrument on one or more of the following grounds: i. that it imposes, or sets the amount of, a charge on public revenue or that it requires payment for a licence, consent or service to be made to the Exchequer, a government department or a public or local authority, or sets the amount of the payment; ii. that its parent legislation says that it cannot be challenged in the courts; iii. that it appears to have retrospective effect without the express authority of the parent legislation; iv. that there appears to have been unjustifiable delay in publishing it or laying it before Parliament; v. that there appears to have been unjustifiable delay in sending a notification under the proviso to section 4(1) of the Statutory Instruments Act 1946, where the instrument has come into force before it has been laid; vi. that there appears to be doubt about whether there is power to make it or that it appears to make an unusual or unexpected use of the power to make; vii. that its form or meaning needs to be explained; viii. that its drafting appears to be defective; ix. any other ground which does not go to its merits or the policy behind it. The Committee usually meets weekly when Parliament is sitting. Publications The reports of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of both Houses. All publications of the Committee are on the Internet at www.parliament.uk/jcsi. Committee staff The current staff of the Committee are John Whatley (Commons Clerk), Kath Kavanagh (Lords Clerk) and Jennifer Steele (Committee Assistant). Advisory Counsel: Peter Davis, Peter Brooksbank and Christine Cogger (Commons); Allan Roberts, Peter Milledge and Nicholas Beach (Lords). Contacts All correspondence should be addressed to the Clerk of the Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments, Delegated Legislation Office, 7 Millbank, London SW1P 3JA. The telephone number for general inquiries is: 020 7219 2026; the Committee's email address is: [email protected]. 1 Contents Report Page Instruments reported 2 1 Draft S.I: Reported for defective drafting. 2 2 S.I 2010/330: Reported for defective drafting. 3 3 S.I 2010/333: Reported for defective drafting. 4 4 S.I 2010/345: Reported for defective drafting. 5 Instruments not reported 7 Annex 7 Appendix 1 12 1 Draft S.I: memorandum from the Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Appendix 2 13 2 S.I. 2010/330: memorandum from the Department for Transport 13 Appendix 3 15 3 S.I. 2010/333: memorandum from the Department of Health/Department for Work and Pensions 15 Appendix 4 16 4 S.I. 2010/345: memorandum from the Ministry of Defence 16 2 Instruments reported At its meeting on 24 March 2010 the Committee scrutinised a number of Instruments in accordance with Standing Orders. It was agreed that the special attention of both Houses should be drawn to four of those considered. The Instruments and the grounds for reporting them are given below. The relevant Departmental memoranda are published as appendices to this report. 1 Draft S.I: Reported for defective drafting. Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces (Amendment) etc. Regulations 2010 (Draft S.I.) 1.1 The Committee draws the special attention of both Houses to these draft Regulations on the ground that they are defectively drafted in two respects. 1.2 Regulation 1 of this draft instrument deals with preliminaries, regulation 2 amends the Royal Parks and Other Open Spaces Regulations 1997, regulation 3 amends Regulations relating to Greenwich Park, regulation 4 amends regulations relating to Hyde Park and The Regent’s Park, regulation 5 contains provision as to parking charges in respect of Bushy Park and Richmond Park, regulation 6 provides for excess charges to be payable where there is a breach of regulation 5, regulation 7, which is headed “Exemptions”, prescribes three circumstances under which no parking charge is payable, and regulation 8 contains provisions relating to regulations 5, 6 and 7. 1.3 Regulation 7 (unlike regulations 6 and 8) is not expressed to relate solely to parking charges payable under regulation 5. In a memorandum printed at Appendix 1, the Department for Culture, Media and Sport suggests that it was not necessary to specify the application of regulation 7 which, in its view, must refer to the only charges imposed by a free-standing provision, namely regulation 5. The Committee does not agree. The powers under which this instrument would be made are capable of applying to numerous parks and open spaces, and there is nothing in the draft to indicate that regulation 7 applies only to Bushy Park and Richmond Park. The Committee accordingly reports regulation 7 for defective drafting. 1.4 Paragraph (1) of regulation 5 provides that a parking charge is payable in respect of a vehicle parked in Bushy Park or Richmond Park at any time between 08:30 hours and 18:30 hours (or the time at which the Park in question closes if that is earlier). Paragraphs (2) and (3) set out amount of charge (per 30 or 15 minutes respectively) and a maximum charge. Paragraph (4) provides that the charge shall be paid to the Secretary of State (or to a person authorised by him to receive such a charge on his behalf) by the person who parked the vehicle in the park. Paragraph (5) permits the Secretary of State (or authorised person) to refuse to accept a payment made other than by such means as are described in a notice exhibited in or at a parking place as means by which payment may be made. 1.5 The Committee asked how it is intended to be established that a contravention of regulation 5 has occurred, given that regulation 5 does not specify when a charge is payable. (The regulations imposing parking charges in other Royal Parks impose an obligation, not to pay a parking charge, but to display a parking permit, for which a charge 3 must be paid.) Regulation 8(2) confers powers on the court where, on any proceedings for a contravention of regulation 5, it is proved that any part of the amount which has become due has not been paid. 1.6 The Department considers that it is implicit in the wording of regulation 5(1) that the obligation to pay the charge is triggered by the act of parking a vehicle in a parking place in the Park in question. It states that the payment for the anticipated duration of the vehicle’s stay must be made forthwith once the vehicle is parked and any additional payment must be made forthwith if the car remains parked after the initial paid period expires, and that the administrative arrangements for operation of the scheme, including the various means by which the charge can be paid, will be described in a notice exhibited by or on behalf of the Secretary of State at the relevant car park, as described in regulation 5(5). 1.7 The italicised words above, quoted from the Department’s memorandum, suggest that the Department is simply assuming that the Regulations achieve what it wants them to achieve. Regulation 5(5) refers only to the means of payment and is entirely silent as to when payment must be made. It is arguable that a person could park a vehicle in Richmond Park every day for a year and pay the year’s charges annually in arrears without contravening regulation 5.
Recommended publications
  • Bushytelegraph PARK CENTREPIECE COMES HOME
    ISSUE JANUARY 2010 8 BushyTelegraph PARK CENTREPIECE COMES HOME The final major part of Bushy Park’s renaissance was completed at the end of last year with the New discovery restoration of the Diana Fountain. During the restoration, the project team uncovered a stone The gilded statue arrived home in November, after four at the base of the statue carved with a crown and the date months of renovation in south London. The scaffolding AR 1712. This would have been added when the statue and around the fountain’s stonework was removed in the fountain were installed in the basin in the middle of Chestnut following week, revealing the magnificent centrepiece Avenue as part of Sir Christopher Wren’s plan to create a of the park. grand route through Bushy Park to Hampton Court gardens. This was the first time in 300 years that the statute The fountain originally stood in the garden of had been moved and the first chance to get an Somerset House and was designed in the 1630s accurate idea of her size: 2.38m tall and 924kg in by the French sculptor, Hubert Le Sueur, for weight. During the restoration, the statue was King Charles l. In 1656, it was moved to Hampton cleaned, coated in four layers of paint, each Court and then just over 60 years later it one slightly more yellow than the last, and moved again to Bushy Park. then finally gilded. Final Bushy Telegraph Bronze and This is the final Bushy Telegraph. We hope you enjoy it as much as the previous issues, which stonework have covered the Bushy Park Restoration The fountain’s bronzes – four boys, Project since 2005.
    [Show full text]
  • Employees Taken from 1911 Census
    The Royal Parks Employees Taken from 1911 Census Forename Surname Age Occupation Place Spouse Age Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Born George Edwin Stanley Abery 32 Gardener Helen Louise 30 26 Burleigh House Beaufort Street Chelsea London SW Herne Bay William Allen 31 Park Labourer Rosina 29 17 Furness Road Fulham London SW Kilburn William Sadlier Allt 24 Gardener 55 Moscow Road Bayswater London W George Agates 35 Gardener Greenwich Park Susan 36 14 Hado Street Greenwich London SE East Grinstead Stephen Aherne 33 Park Labourer Regent's Park Margrite 34 41 Hawley Road Chalk Farm St Pancras London N Limerick John Ainsworth 43 Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Margaret Jane 30 96b Queen's Road Battersea London SW Roorkee Edgar George Archer 21 Gardener Regent's Park 46 Sulina Road Brixton London Corsham Henry Absolom Ashton 41 Gardener Jane 40 St James's Mission 7, 9 & 11 Sirdon Road Notting Hill London W Langley Marsh Charles Atkin 62 Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Bushy Park Kate 47 3 Upper Lodge Stable Yard Bushy Park Middlesex Stapleford Charles Avery 40 Park Labourer Richmond Park Ellen Priscilla 117 Kings Road Kingston upon ThamesSurrey Shottesbrook Henry Bahrenburg 62 Sergeant Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Hampton Court Alice 57 Home Park Lodge Hampton Court Surrey Stepney Thomas Bailey 75 Gate Keeper Hyde Park Mary 65 Alexandra Gate Lodge Hyde Park London W Huntingdon George Arnold Baker 24 Gardener 55 Moscow Road Bayswater London W Southampton Henry Thomas Balchen 48 Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Greenwich Park Eliza Ann 42 18 Creed Place Greenwich
    [Show full text]
  • Richmond Park and Bushy Park
    Richmond Park and Bushy Park Parking Impact Assessment Project Ref: 20827/019 July 2009 Peter Brett Associates LLP Caversham Bridge House Waterman Place Reading Berkshire RG1 8DN T: 0118 9500761 F: 0118 9597498 E: [email protected] Richmond Park and Bushy Park Parking Impact Assessment We print on 100% recycled paper from sustainable suppliers accredited to ISO 14001. \\cbh-srv-dr1\projects\20827 - Royal Parks Highway Consultancy ii Services\019 - Parking Impact Study\Report\090729 Final.doc Richmond Park and Bushy Park Parking Impact Assessment \\cbh-srv-dr1\projects\20827 - Royal Parks Highway Consultancy iv Services\019 - Parking Impact Study\Report\090729 Final.doc Richmond Park and Bushy Park Parking Impact Assessment Contents 1 Introduction............................................................................................................................... 1 2 Proposals .................................................................................................................................. 2 3 Richmond Park ......................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Introduction 3 3.2 Public Transport 5 3.3 Existing Parking Regimes 6 3.4 Parking Charges – Potential Impact 10 3.5 Summary 11 4 Bushy Park .............................................................................................................................. 12 4.1 Introduction 12 4.2 Public Transport 13 4.3 Existing Parking Regimes 14 4.4 Parking Charges – Potential Impact
    [Show full text]
  • Employees Taken from 1911 Census
    The Royal Parks Employees Taken from 1911 Census Forename Surname Age Occupation Place Spouse Age Address 1 Address 2 Address 3 Born 1 George Edwin Stanley Abery 32 Gardener Helen Louise 30 26 Burleigh House Beaufort Street Chelsea London SW Herne Bay Kent 1 William Allen 31 Park Labourer Rosina 29 17 Furness Road Fulham London SW Kilburn London 2 William Sadlier Allt 24 Gardener 55 Moscow Road Bayswater London W Ireland 1 George Agates 35 Gardener Greenwich Park Susan 36 14 Hado Street Greenwich London SE East Grinstead Surrey 1 Stephen Aherne 33 Park Labourer Regent's Park Margrite 34 41 Hawley Road Chalk Farm St Pancras London N Limerick Ireland John Ainsworth 43 Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Margaret Jane 30 96b Queen's Road Battersea London SW Roorkee India Edgar George Archer 21 Gardener Regent's Park 46 Sulina Road Brixton London Corsham Wiltshire Sidney Herbert Arnold 24 Gardener Hampton Court 11 Walpole Road Teddington Middlesex Hampton Court Surrey 1 Henry Absolom Ashton 41 Gardener Jane 40 St James's Mission 7, 9 & 11 Sirdon Road Notting Hill London W Langley Marsh Buckinghamshire 3 Charles Atkin 62 Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Bushy Park Kate 47 3 Upper Lodge Stable Yard Bushy Park Middlesex Stapleford Nottinghamshire 1 Charles Avery 40 Park Labourer Richmond Park Ellen Priscilla 117 Kings Road Kingston upon ThamesSurrey Shottesbrook Berkshire 3 Henry Bahrenburg 62 Sergeant Park Keeper (Army Pensioner) Hampton Court Alice 57 Home Park Lodge Hampton Court Surrey Stepney London 3 Thomas Bailey 75 Gate Keeper Hyde Park Mary 65
    [Show full text]
  • Download Our Brochure
    downsize to your dream lifestyle 2 3 contents 6 LOCAL AREA 16 BEAUTIFULLY CONNECTED 18 LOCAL MAP 22 COMMUNAL SPACES 28 GARDENS 34 SERVICES AND CONCIERGE 36 THE RESIDENCES 46 INTERIOR SPECIFICATION 50 ABOUT LIFESTYLE RESIDENCES 54 MARKETING SUITE 4 Computer generated image of Mulberry Court, indicative only 4 your local neighbourhood 3 2 5 Hampton Wick is a stone’s throw from the River Thames. Just over the bridge is Kingston Town Centre offering a world of shopping, cafés, restaurants and culture. Bushy Park and Hampton Court Palace are a short walk away. 1 6 1 River Thames 2 Kingston 7 3 Kingston Bridge Mulberry Court 4 Hampton Court Palace 5 Bushy Park 6 Hampton Wick High Street 7 Hampton Wick Station 8 Marketing Suite Mulberry Court 8 6 7 live life in style Mulberry Court is an elegant new development of 34 stylish apartments for independent retirement living, in the heart of Hampton Wick. Set in beautiful landscaped gardens just a stone’s throw from the banks of the River Thames, the village centre and the mainline train station, at Mulberry Court you’ll enjoy a peaceful location, with a vibrant local neighbourhood on your doorstep. Mulberry Court offers a rare opportunity to purchase a one or two-bedroom property designed to the highest specification, with access to spectacular shared spaces including an on-site salon, club room, and café, along with the added convenience of a full range of concierge and support services. Mulberry Court is a village within a village where homeowners become part of a thriving community; catching up with friends in the welcoming café, relaxing in the garden or enjoying a class in the exercise studio.
    [Show full text]
  • Name of Person Letter Is Being Sent To
    Date: 15th March 2012 Our ref: FOL12/76 Ms Sheena Renton William G Search Ltd Market Works Whitehall Road Leeds LS12 6EP Dear Ms Renton, FOL12/76 – SUPPLY OF ELECTRIC GOLF BUGGIES On behalf of the Secretary of State for Culture, Olympics, Media and Sport, I accept your offer to supply Electric Golf Buggies, on the basis of your tender submitted 28/02/12. This letter and the documents, listed below, will together form a binding contract between the Secretary of State and your Company. Schedule 1 – Background & Instructions to Tenderers Schedule 2 – Specification of Requirements Schedule 3 – Signed Form of Tender Your tender submission Clarification e-mail to Steve Edwards dated 01/03/2012 A purchase order to cover the exact requirements will be forwarded as soon as possible. The liaison officer for the Contract is Steve Edwards, Park Manager Hyde Park. E-mail: [email protected] Phone: 0300 061 2101 If you are content with the contents of this letter and related documents please confirm by signing the enclosed acknowledgement form and returning it to the address indicated. Yours sincerely Sarah Blyth Head of Procurement The Old Police House, Hyde Park, London W2 2UH Tel: 020 7298 2000 Fax: 020 7298 2005 BUSHY PARK & THE LONGFORD RIVER THE GREEN PARK GREENWICH PARK HYDE PARK KENSINGTON GARDENS THE REGENTS PARK (with PRIMROSE HILL) RICHMOND PARK ST JAMES’S PARK & BROMPTON CEMETERY www.royalparks.org.uk ISO 14001 ACCREDITED To:- Rabia Rehman Procurement Officer The Royal Parks The Old Police House Hyde Park London W2 2UH FOL12/76 – SUPPLY OF ELECTRIC GOLF BUGGIES I acknowledge receipt of your letter dated 15/03/12 and accept its contents.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report and Accounts 2005-06
    BROMPTON CEMETERY BUSHY PARK The Royal Parks is an Executive Agency of the Department for Culture, Media and Sports (DCMS). THE GREEN PARK Presented to the House of Commons pursuant to section 7 of The Government Resources & Accounts Act 2000. Ordered by GREENWICH PARK the House of Commons to be printed on the 19th July 2006. HYDE PARK KENSINGTON GARDENS THE REGENT’S PARK WITH PRIMROSE HILL RICHMOND PARK ST JAMES’S PARK Chief Executive’s foreword 2 Management structure 3 THE ROYAL Managing our environment 4 PARKS ANNUAL Getting people involved 7 Encouraging sport 10 REPORT AND Protecting our wildlife 13 ACCOUNTS Enhancing the visitor experience 16 2005-06 Looking after our heritage 19 Working behind the scenes 22 Performance against key targets 24 Quality targets 25 The year ahead 26 Accounts 27 HC1411 London:The Stationery Office Ltd £13.50 THE ROYAL PARKS ANNUAL REPORT & ACCOUNTS 05-06 Chief Executive’s foreword Management structure MILLIONS OF PEOPLE VISIT LONDON’S ROYAL THE SECRETARY OF STATE FOR CULTURE, PARKS FOR FREE EVERY YEAR.THEY DO SO FOR MEDIA AND SPORT IS THE MINISTER DIVERSE REASONS – TO EXPERIENCE THE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ROYAL PARKS, WILDLIFE,TO SOAK UP THE HISTORY,TO ALTHOUGH SOME RESPONSIBILITIES HAVE PARTICIPATE IN SPORT,TO ATTEND ONE OF BEEN DELEGATED TO THE MINISTER FOR THE MANY EVENTS WE HOST, OR SIMPLY TO CULTURE.THE SECRETARY OF STATE SIT BACK AND ENJOY THE BEAUTIFUL DETERMINES POLICY OBJECTIVES, FINANCIAL NATURAL SURROUNDINGS.WHATEVER FRAMEWORK AND ALLOCATION OF REASON PEOPLE VISIT,WE WANT THEM TO GET FINANCIAL RESOURCES, INCLUDING KEY THE MOST FROM THEIR EXPERIENCE – AND TARGETS AND ALSO APPROVES THE WE WORK HARD TO MAKE SURE THAT THE FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT, CORPORATE AND ROYAL PARKS ARE WONDERFUL PLACES TO BUSINESS PLANS FOR THE ROYAL PARKS.
    [Show full text]
  • London Loop Section 9 Page 1 LONDON LOOP
    London Loop section 9 page 1 LONDON LOOP Section 9 of 24 Kingston Bridge to Hatton Cross Section start: Kingston Bridge Nearest station to start: Kingston (Rail) Section finish: Hatton Cross Nearest station to finish: Hatton Cross (Piccadilly Line) Section distance 9.6 miles plus 0.4 miles of station links Total = 10.0 miles (16.0 km) Introduction This section of the Loop features easy walking with some extensive green stretches on entirely level ground, mostly on grass and rough footpaths. There is one stile which is easily by-passed through a large gap. Points of interest on this section are Bushy Park, the Diana Fountain, Waterhouse Woodland Gardens, Crane Park, the Shot Tower and Hounslow Heath. There are cafés and pubs along the route in Kingston, coffee stalls in Bushy Park and a café in Waterside Gardens. There are neighbourhood shops at the junction of Powder Mill Lane, as well as a Sainsbury’s supermarket and a Starbucks at Hampton. There are toilets near the Diana Fountain in Bushy Park, in the Waterhouse Woodland Gardens and at the Sainsbury’s in Hampton. You can shorten the route by taking a bus at Hampton Road or, a little later, a train from Fullwell station. A bus from Staines Road in Hampton takes you to Twickenham Station. This version by members of the Ramblers for Transport for London In this format: text © Ramblers 2021, maps © OpenStreetMap Downloaded from: https://innerlondonramblers.org.uk/loop Published: May 2021 London Loop section 9 page 2 Did you know? Walking directions Probably three, and If you are starting from Kingston station, on leaving the station use the possibly as many as pedestrian crossing immediately in front of you and continue ahead down eight, Saxon kings were Fife Road.
    [Show full text]
  • September 2019 Volume #19
    Issue #9 September 2019 Volume #19 Gary Schroeder (55), Founding Editor (1936-2016) Bill Rumble, Editor email: [email protected] Pat (Terpening) Owen, Assistant Editor email: [email protected] Visit the Bushy Park Website at http://www.bushypark.org/ CLASS REPRESENTATIVES 1953 – Jackie (Brown) Kenny 1958 – Pat (Terpening) Owen [email protected] [email protected] 1959 – John “Mike” Hall [email protected] 1954 – Betsy (Neff) Cote [email protected] 1960 – Ren Briggs 1955 – Volunteer Requested [email protected] 1956 – Edie (Williams) Wingate [email protected] 1961 – Betsy (Schley) Slepetz [email protected] 1957 – Shirley (Huff) Dulski [email protected] 1962 – Dona (Hale) Ritchie [email protected] 1 ROSTER CHANGES From: Pat Terpening (58) Owen ____________________________________________________________________ A little reminder to all –if/when you change your email address, please let Pat Terpening (58) Owen [email protected] or me know [email protected] , if you want to continue to receive the newsletter. Too many times we only find out when you send us an email saying you haven’t received the newsletter in few months. Thanks, guys. _____________________________________________________________________________ Special Notice: We received a lot of favorable feedback on the August 2019 issue’s story from Elsa Coleman (60) Blades about returning all the service people at the end of WWII. Pat Owen had the great idea to devote the November 2019 issue to brief narratives of our parents’ WWII service and a photo of them during the time of their WWII service. So, please send me your emails, narratives and photos NO LATER THAN October 15, 2019. If you do not have a scanner, merely take a picture of the photo you wish to send using a smartphone, tablet or digital camera and send that digital image to me by email.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushy Park Gardens Conservation Area No.77
    CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES BUSHY PARK GARDENS CONSERVATION AREA NO.77 Consultation Draft, November 2020 Note: Every effort has been made interest. Therefore, the omission of any a more detailed and up-to-date to ensure the accuracy of this feature does not necessarily convey assessment of a particular site and its document but due to the complexity a lack of significance. The Council will context is undertaken. This may reveal of conservation areas, it would be continue to assess each development additional considerations relating to impossible to include every facet proposal on its own merits, on a site- character or appearance which may be BUSHY PARK GARDENS contributing to the area’s special specific basis. As part of this process, of relevance to a particular case. 1 CONSERVATION AREA No.77 CONSERVATION AREA APPRAISAL LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES Introduction PURPOSE OF THIS DOCUMENT The principal aims of conservation • Raise public interest and This document has been area appraisals are to: awareness of the special produced using the guidance set character of their area; out by Historic England in the 2019 • Describe the historic and publication titled Understanding architectural character and • Identify the positive features Place: Conservation Area appearance of the area which should be conserved, Designation, Appraisal and which will assist applicants in as well as negative features Management, Historic England making successful planning which indicate scope for future Advice Note 1 (Second Edition). applications and decision enhancements. makers in assessing planning This document will be a material applications; consideration when assessing planning applications.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twickenham Tribune Richmond Upon Thames College Hosts Q&A with Twickenham Parliamentary Candidates
    Est 2016 Borough of Twickenham 0030 The Twickenham Tribune Richmond upon Thames College hosts Q&A with Twickenham Parliamentary Candidates On Friday 26th May, staff and students at Richmond upon Thames Contents “Hustings” at RuTC College (RuTC) attended a question and answer session with the Local Postcards Twickenham Parliamentary candidates Sir Vince Cable (Liberal Twickers Foodie Competitions Democrats), Dr Tania Mathias (Conservatives) and Dr Katherine Dunne Arts and Entertainment Reviews (Labour). Lost Lidos Recycle at Library Visit to International Courts Staff and students from Film Festival Twickenham Tug of War across the college attended Best Learner Award the event including The Big Picnic Conservative Candidate for students studying A Level Twickenham Twickenham Riverside Government and Politics and Consultation Supported Learning students. Election Hustings England Rugby Hampton Carnival Teddington in Flower One of the questions asked Indian Honey Fete addressed what the candidates would do to improve the employability rate Heathrow Expansion of people with learning difficulties. All of the candidates agreed that this Contributors Alan Winter was an issue that needed urgent attention and something that they would TwickerSeal Alison Jee all look at addressing if they were elected for Twickenham. Erica White Mark Aspen St Mary’s University Other topics discussed included Brexit and the effect on business, Shona Lyons Tamesis Club university fees and the privatisation of the NHS. Richmond upon Thames College Hampton Wick Association Robin Ghurbhurun, CEO & Amnesty International (Hustings) Principal of RuTC commented Dr Tania Mathias “this event was a great Sir Vincent Cable Brian Holder opportunity for our students Jeevika TAG to meet the local candidates EDITORS: and ask the questions that are Teresa Read most important to them and Berkley Driscoll their future.
    [Show full text]
  • Bushy House and the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington
    Local History Notes Bushy House and the National Physical Laboratory, Teddington Bushy House The early history of Bushy House is obscure as there were several lodges in Bushy Park with no particular names. Bushy Park, at the time of Charles I, was divided into three parts – Bushy Park consisted of 350 acres, Middle Park with 370 acres and the Harewarren with 380 acres. Some sources state that Bushy House was built on the site of Upper Lodge, but maps show both houses – Old Lodge and New Lodge in c1680, Upper Lodge and Lower Lodge in c1750. It is possible that the confusion arose because the same person had owned both properties at some time. Upper Lodge was the residence of the Keeper of Bushy Park and Bushy Lodge used for the Keeper of Middle Park and Harewarren. A lodge in Middle Park was first built in 1611 and was possibly rebuilt nine years later. A new Keeper’s Lodge was built within the next twenty years. Edward Proger built Bushy Lodge - near or on the site of the previous lodge - in 1663 by order of Charles II. Proger was a Groom of the King’s Bedchamber, an M.P. and Lord of the Manor of West Stow in Suffolk and was made Keeper of the Middle Park and Harewarren in 1665. After the death of Charles II in 1685, Proger retired to Busky Lodge. It had cost £4000 to build and Proger was never reimbursed except for two payments of £4000 which he received in the two years before his death in 1713 aged 96 at Bushy House ‘through the pain of cutting new teeth’.
    [Show full text]