The Craftsmanship of the Emirate of Bukhara at the Second Half of the XIX Century - the Beginning of the XX Century
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Politics of Memory in Samarkand in Post-Soviet Period
127 International Journal of Modern Anthropology Int. J. Mod. Anthrop. (2018) Vol: 2, Issue No: 11, pp: 127 - 145 Available online at: www.ata.org.tn ; DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijma.v2i11.6 Research Report The politics of memory in Samarkand in post-Soviet period Azim Malikov Azim Malikov is a Senior research fellow affiliated to the Department of Anthropology and Ethnology of Institute of History, Academy of Sciences of Republic of Uzbekistan, Tashkent. From 2004 to 2005, he directed the Centre for Study of History of Uzbekistan at Samarkand State University. His research interests are focused in the areas of Identity, ethnicity, memory, Islamic shrines and sacred lineages in Central Asia, social and cultural transformation, and history of Samarkand. The Institute of History of The Academy of Sciences of The Republic of Uzbekistan.100060, Tashkent, Shahrisabzstreet 1, dom 5. E-mail: [email protected] (Received 17 March 2018; Accepted 20 April 2018; Published 5 May 2018) Abstract - In this paper the author explores the strategy of politics of memory in Samarkand, the hometown of the First President of Uzbekistan I.A. Karimov, in the post-Soviet period. The analysis concerns the traditions of Samarkand's memory culture chosen, invented or forgotten in independent Uzbekistan, to form ideas about the past using historical figures, monuments, holy places and renamed streets in Samarkand as examples. In this complex process it is important to take into consideration how the central authorities interacted with the local cultural elite of Samarkand. President Sh.Mirziyoyev formulated new trends in Uzbekistan's foreign policy, which was reflected in the politics of memory in Samarkand. -
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 22
ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 22 On the Edge The Concept of Progress in Bukhara during the Rule of the Later Manghits Franz Wennberg Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in Ihresalen, engelska Parken, Thunbergsvägen 3, Uppsala, Saturday, 14 December 2013 at 10:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: professor emeritus Bert Fragner (Institute for Iranian Studies at the Austrian Academy of Sciences). Abstract Wennberg, F. 2013. On the Edge. The Concept of Progress in Bukhara during the Rule of the Later Manghits. Studia Iranica Upsaliensia 22. 215 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsalien- sis. ISBN 978-91-554-8805-5. This work is a study of the concept of progress in Bukhara between approximately 1860 and 1920. It is based on unpublished and published sources from this period. The study suggests that not only the technological and social developments that took place on a global scale between 1860 and 1920 affected the conceptualization of progress in Bukhara, but that globa- lized narratives on progress did so as well. Cosmographical concepts and explanations that previously were more common were notably absent in what during the 1910s became a disco- urse on progress, but the concept of progress still had an important eschatological dimension and was closely related to apocalypticism. Chapter One presents the context of the study. The second chapter discusses the theoreti- cal framework and the analytical concepts. The next chapter continues by outlining the politi- cal, economic and cultural conditions in Bukhara during this period as well as providing a short historiographical discussion. -
1 Dār Al-Islām Under Russian Rule As Understood by Turkestani Muslim
1 KOMATSU Hisao Dār al‐Islām under Russian Rule As Understood by Turkestani Muslim Intellectuals Since the Perestroika period, studies in the modern history of Turkestan have made great progress. Most of them, with critical attitudes to Soviet historiography, have been distinguished by their new interpretation and approaches. While the creation of national histories has advanced in the newly independent republics of Central Asia, researchers abroad, mak- ing use of a great amount of newly obtained source materials, have be- gun to explore various aspects of political, social, and intellectual history of modern Turkestan.1 Among these research trends, studies of the intellectual history during the Tsarist period have great significance and possibilities. They will enable us to understand the historical dynamism of modern Turkestan from within; in other words, through the various discourses of Muslim intellectuals. Faced with a series of great changes following the Russian invasion in the second half of the nineteenth century, they played a leading role in directing their Muslim communities and sometimes in social and cultural reform movements such as Jadidism.2 At the same 1 Stéphane A. Dudoignon and KOMATSU Hisao, eds., Research Trends in Modern Central Eurasian Studies (18th–20th Centuries): A Selective and Critical Bibliography of Works Published between 1985 and 2000, pts. 1–2 (Tokyo: The Toyo Bunko, 2003–2006). 2 For the details see Adeeb Khalid, The Politics of Muslim Cultural Reform: Jadidism in 3 KOMATSU Hisao time, studies of intellectual history will contribute to examining con- temporary issues such as Islamic resurgence and politics in post-Soviet Central Asia in a historical perspective.3 This paper aims to present some preliminary observations as well as prospects for further research in this field. -
Not for Distribution
Asiatic Russia Although the Russian Empire has traditionally been viewed as a European borderland, most of its territory was actually situated in Asia. Imperial power was huge but often suffered from a lack of enough information and resources to rule its culturally diverse subjects, and asymmetric relations between state and society combined with flexible strategies of local actors sometimes produced unexpected results. In Asiatic Russia, an international team of scholars explores the interactions between power and people in Central Asia, Siberia, the Volga-Urals, and the Caucasus from the 18th to the early 20th centuries, drawing on a wealth of Russian archival materials and Turkic, Persian, and Tibetan sources. The variety of top- ics discussed in the book includes the Russian idea of a “civilizing mission,” the system of governor-generalships, imperial geography and demography, roles of Muslim and Buddhist networks in imperial rule and foreign policy, social change in the Russian Protectorate of Bukhara, Muslim reformist and national movements. The book is essential reading for students and scholars of Russian, Central Eur- asian, and comparative imperial history, as well as imperial and colonial studies and nationalism studies. It may also provide some hints for understanding today’s world, where “empire” has again become a key word in international and domestic power relations. UYAMA Tomohiko is professor at the Slavic Research Center, Hokkaido Univer- sity. He specializes in the history of the Russian Empire and contemporary politics in Central Asia, and is the editor of Empire, Islam, and Politics in Central Eurasia (2007) andNot co-editor of Japan’sfor Silk Distribution Road Diplomacy (2008).