Summer 2002 Newsletter of the Delaware Estuary Program

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summer 2002 Newsletter of the Delaware Estuary Program Volume 12 / Issue 4 estuary news Summer 2002 Newsletter of the Delaware Estuary Program The Delaware Estuary and the Chesapeake Bay: Physical Differences that create Ecological Challenges By Jonathan H. Sharp, University of Delaware College of Marine Studies Almost 25 years ago, when I began a major research project completely than the Chesapeake. If you compute the total volume on the Delaware Estuary, there was a news note in the profes- of water held by the basin and the composite discharge of the sional journal Science that referred to the Delaware Bay as the rivers into the basin, the Delaware has a “flushing time” of Chesapeake’s “dirty little sister.” In the 1980’s, an editorial in about 100 days contrasted to that of the Chesapeake, which is the Delaware State News offered a more descriptive contrast 350 days. Perhaps more critical is the fact that the Chesapeake, between the two bodies of water: with its deep central portion and shal- “The Chesapeake is a sailboat gliding low narrow opening at the mouth, across sun-speckled water at sunset. stratifies in the summer while the The Delaware is a tanker lightering Delaware does not. This means that its dark oily cargo into a bleak barge the subsurface waters of the in dark gray water.” I am sure that Chesapeake Bay (deeper than about most readers of Estuary News can 15 feet) become isolated from the appreciate the inaccuracies of these surface and stagnant in the summer. somewhat derogatory comparisons. These bottom waters, receiving fallout Editorial comments aside, there are from the surface algal production, suf- differences between these two vitally fer from severe oxygen depletion important bodies of water. These dif- (hypoxia) to no oxygen at all (anoxia). ferences define how the Delaware Because the Delaware Bay waters Estuary is viewed by the public and are well mixed in the summer and how state and federal agencies manage flush rapidly, there are no problems these natural resources. with subsurface hypoxia and anoxia. This represents a very important differ- The Delaware and Chesapeake Bays ence between these two water bodies. have similar geological origins. The uplift of the Appalachian Mountains, In the past 50 years, in many estuaries completed about 70 million years and coastal waters across the United ago, which separated the Piedmont States and the rest of the developed highlands from the lower coastal world, there is good evidence that plain, created a fall line near Trenton loadings and concentrations of nitrogen that defines the head of the tides of and phosphorus plant nutrients have the Delaware Estuary; the Chesapeake fall line on the increased greatly. Increased levels of nutrients tend to increase Susquehanna River is of similar origin. Drainage of the the production of algae in these water bodies, especially of the Piedmont gave rise to the Delaware River channel carving microscopic phytoplankton. In the Chesapeake Bay, there is through the coastal plain on its transit to the Atlantic Ocean. concern that this has contributed to hypoxia and anoxia. The The current configuration of the estuaries occurred with the Delaware Estuary, with its different physical characteristics, retreat of the last glaciation about 11,000 years ago. Thus the does not have the same problem. To attack the problem in the Chesapeake and Delaware, carved by glaciation, have similar Chesapeake Bay, extensive reduction in nutrient inputs are origins but very different physical characteristics. mandated. No such need exists in the Delaware Estuary. The nutrient-associated oxygen depletion problem in the Chesapeake The Chesapeake Bay is five times larger than the Delaware; is viewed as a relatively new problem of the past few decades. it has a comparatively narrow, deep center with a shallow sill Today, there is considerable concern about the deterioration of near its mouth. The Delaware Bay, in contrast, is broad and environmental conditions of the Chesapeake Bay. shallow. In addition, the Delaware flushes more quickly and (continued on page 2) For more than a century, the Delaware Estuary, especially the We certainly should not conclude that the Delaware Estuary is urban river region near Philadelphia, had serious environmen- a “clean little sister” of the Chesapeake, but one of the most tal problems with respect to oxygen depletion. Owing to dis- pressing problems for the neighboring Chesapeake Bay is not charge of poorly treated sewage effluents, there was severe a similar problem for the Delaware and remedial action being oxygen depletion in surface waters called a primary biological implemented for the Chesapeake is not necessarily the same oxygen demand (BOD). More thorough treatment of sewage for the Delaware. The Delaware Estuary Program (DELEP) brought about by upgrades in the major sewage treatment has recognized these differences, which have influenced the plants has greatly reduced BOD, and as a result the oxygen DELEP Management Plan guiding how we use this valuable level in the Delaware River has increased dramatically in the resource. last 25 years. This oxygen increase constitutes one of the most successful estuarine water quality improvements of any Basic ecological processes are similar in all estuaries, but how estuary in the world. Thus, while the Chesapeake is suffering they are expressed varies with the physical features of the environmental deterioration from oxygen depletion, the estuary. It is important to recognize these differences when Delaware is showing an improvement. developing long-range plans that are appropriate for the spe- cific environment. This is exactly what we are trying to do for the Delaware Estuary. Updates from DELEP Information Management Toxics Advisory Advisory Committee (IMAC) Committee (TAC) The IMAC has received approval and funding for the “i-Map” The following Toxics Advisory Committee resolutions were pre- project. This project will use Internet mapping software to sented to the Commissioners at the May 31, 2002 Delaware allow users to respond to a series of questions that result in a River Basin Commission (DRBC) meeting: specific theme within the Delaware River Basin. For example, a person interested in kayaking the Delaware River would be • It was recommended that DRBC proceed with the devel- able to access flow information, as well as to identify portages opment and adoption of aquatic life and human health cri- and launch areas. Each theme will be displayed in the form of teria for toxic pollutants in Zone 1 of the Delaware River. an interactive map that the user can zoom, click on to get more detailed information, or print. The project is expected to be • It was recommended that a fish consumption rate of 17.5 completed this fall. Keep your eye out on the Delaware grams/day be used in Zones 1 - 6 for purposes of deriving Estuary Program’s web site at www.delep.org for its debut. human health water quality criteria. The TAC further rec- ommended that DRBC collect site-specific fish consump- tion data to serve as the basis for future revision of the human health water quality criteria in Zones 1 through 4. (The ‘fish consumption rate’ is a statistically derived value for the amount of fish consumed per person per day. The meetings of the DELEP Implementation Teams occur on a regular basis and are open to the public. For meeting dates and times, please call the individuals listed below: Public Participation Habitat and Living Resources Fish Consumption Implementation Team Implementation Team Advisory Team Kathy Klein Martha Maxwell-Doyle Tom Fikslin, DRBC (800) 445-4935 (609) 883-9500 ext. 215 (609) 883-9500 ext. 253 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] The Delaware River Basin Commission also has three Advisory Committees that serve in the same capacity as the Implementation Teams: Monitoring Advisory Committee Information Management Toxics Advisory Committee Edward Santoro, Advisory Committee Tom Fikslin, DRBC Monitoring Coordinator Warren Huff, (609) 883-9500 ext. 237 (609) 883-9500 ext. 253 (609) 883-9500 ext. 268 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] or Karl Heinicke, RIMS Coordinator (609) 883-9500 ext. 241 [email protected] Page 2 Volume 12 / Issue 4 Different populations and regions can have different fish are issued in the Delaware Estuary. Currently, the states of consumption rates. Fish consumption rates do not indi- Delaware, New Jersey, and Pennsylvania independently develop cate the amount of fish that is safe to eat, but rather are fish consumption advisories for the Estuary. In addition, no tools used in calculating necessary water quality targets coordinated program currently exists among the states for and estimating risks to public health.) informing the public of health risks for consuming contaminated fish. This results in incomplete and inconsistent advice to the The TAC is currently considering a two-day technical workshop public. that would present current studies such as atmospheric depo- The FCAT’s goal is to develop a methodology to be used by sition to members of the committee. the states to establish consistent and clearly understandable fish consumption advisories for the Estuary, which would include Fish Consumption establishing uniform collection and analysis procedures, com- Advisory Team (FCAT) patible risk assessment procedures, and risk communication strategies. A Fish Consumption Advisory Team has been established to address the consistency of fish consumption advisories that Tidings: News from Around the Region Cooper River Fishway Restoration Team Receives 2001 Alewife Coastal America Partnership (Alosa pseudoharengus) Award Blueback herring (Alosa aestivalis) By Catherine Libertz, Delaware Estuary Program Coordinator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region III On May 13, 2002 a Coastal America Partnership Award was In anticipation of the fishways being installed, a streambank given to the participants of the Cooper River Fishway restoration project was completed under the leadership of the Restoration Team.
Recommended publications
  • Sussex County, Delaware
    Toward Heritage Tourism in Sussex County, Delaware Report to the Coastal Community Enhancement Initiative, 2007 Small Towns EXPLORE Agriculture Sussex Architecture Religion Maritime Landscape Produced by the Center for Historic Architecture and Design and the Institute for Public Administration—University of Delaware Toward Heritage Tourism in Sussex County, Delaware Prepared by Andrew Homsey, David Ames, Xuan Jiang, and Rebekah Gayley November, 2007 Toward Heritage Tourism in Sussex County, Delaware, CHAD/IPA i Acknowledgments Acknowledgments This report, Toward Heritage Tourism in Sussex County, Delaware, was funded through a grant from the Coastal Community Enhancement Initiative (CCEI), a cooperative partnership among the Colleges of Marine & Earth Studies, Agriculture & Natural Resources, and Human Services, Education, & Public Policy at the University of Delaware. This is a joint project of the Center for Historic Architecture and Design (CHAD) and the Institute for Public Administration (IPA) , in the College of Human Services, Education & Public Policy (CHEP) at the University of Delaware. The University of Delaware is committed to assuring equal opportunity to all persons and does not discrimi- nate on the basis of race, creed, color, gender, age, religion, national origin, veteran or handicapped status, or sexual orientation in its educational programs, activities, admissions or employment practices as required by Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and other applicable statutes. Inquiries concerning Section 504 compliance and information regarding campus accessibility should be referred to the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Coordinator, 831-4643, located at 413 Academy Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Hosta Seizure
    1 Hosta Seizure While gardeners tend their hostas, hostas tend their gardeners … Table of Contents 10 No Satisfaction ................................................................................................................. 3 11 Sleeping Sickness ............................................................................................................ 13 12 Triangles and Thomas Kuhn ............................................................................................ 18 13 Emph Memory ................................................................................................................ 26 14 Twisted Sister's Twisted Sister ........................................................................................ 28 15 Humans 101 .................................................................................................................... 31 16 Halcyon Days .................................................................................................................. 33 17 Honeymoon Hosta .......................................................................................................... 38 19 From the Mouth of Babes ............................................................................................... 48 20 Hosta Beleafs .................................................................................................................. 49 21 Back at the Office Park .................................................................................................... 53 22 Creation Hostary Class
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware the First State
    Fl64.3 H64 1988 Dt:carolE Hoffecker "T1, •• � ·' .. Dr. Carol E. Hoffecker DELAW\RE, TheFirst State A Delaware Heritage Commission book commemo­ rating the 200th anniversary of the United States Constitution and Delaware's ratification as "The First State." Publication made possible through a grant from The Na­ tional Society of The Colonial Dames of America in the State of Delaware ............. Freedom's First MIDDLE ATLANTIC PRE SS Moorestown, New Jersey DELAWARE, THE FIRST STATE A MIDDLE ATLANTIC PRESS BOOK All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, record­ ing, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. A Delaware Heritage Commission book, commemorating the ratification of the United States Constitution by Delaware, "The First State." Copyright© 1988 by Carol E. Hoffecker Li brary of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Hoffecker, Carol E. Delaware, the first state. Summary: Examines the history of Delaware, from its first inhabitants and the arrival of European settlers to the effect of modem times on its business and gov­ ernment. 1. Delaware-History-Juvenile literature. [L Delaware-History] !. Delaware Heritage Commission. 11. Title. Fl64.3.I-164 1987 975.1 87-11200 ISBN 0-9705804-0-1 Manufactured in the United Stales of America 7th Printing Middle Atlantic Press 10 Twosome Drive P.O. Box 600 Moorestown, NJ 08057 856-235-4444 Table of Contents Unit One Discovering
    [Show full text]
  • February 2010
    Page 1 Phactum February 2010 Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, PhactumPhactum diagnosing it The Newsletter of the incorrectly and applying the wrong Philadelphia Association for Critical Thinking remedies. February 2010 – Groucho Marx editor: Ray Haupt email: [email protected] Webmaster: Wes Powers http://phact.org/ Saturday, February 20, 2010 at 2:00 PM Dr. David Cattell, Chairman of the Physics Department of Community College of Philadelphia, will host Dr. Ted Goertzel, Professor of Sociology at Rutgers University, for a discussion of ConspiracyConspiracy TheoriesTheories inin ScienceScience In Lecture Room C2-28 in the Center for Business and Industry at the corner of 18th and Callowhill Streets. Parking is easily available but is no longer free for PhACT attendees at CCP events. The Saturday parking rate is $3.50. Enter the college parking lot on 17th Street which is one way south bound. This meeting site is handicap accessible. This PhACT event is free and open to the general public. Dr. Goertzel‘s talk will include claims on both sides of the global warming issue, that the other side is censoring, and will discuss conspiracy belief in general. Conspiracy Theory is an immensely rich topic as our lives are surrounded by various conspiracies great and small, malevolent and good natured. Some are sinister such as political intrigues and criminal plots to discredit or defraud. Others are harmless, such as the silliness of UFO claimants and those elaborate schemes to carry out a surprise party. (Continued on page 2) One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Gateway to the Nation
    Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Gateway to the Nation Delaware Breakwater Corridor Management Plan Lighthouse Lightship Overfalls Cape May - Lewes Ferry Canary Creek Hazell Smith House Fort Miles Prepared for: Pre-War Savannah Road Zwaanendael Museum CITY OF LEWES SUSSEX COUNTY OCTOBER 2015 DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Prepared by: DELAWARE GREENWAYS LARDNER/KLEIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, PC Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Gateway to the Nation Corridor Management Plan Prepared for: CITY OF LEWES SUSSEX COUNTY DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Prepared by: DELAWARE GREENWAYS october 2015 LARDNER/KLEIN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS, PC with assistance from Heritage Strategies, Inc. Fitzgerald and Halliday, Inc. ROLE OF THE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES WHO PARTICIPATED IN DEVELOPING THIS PLAN Corridor Management Plans for Byways are designed to reflect the vision, goals and recommendations of the members of the general public participating in the development of the Plan. While DNREC, DelDOT, Sussex County and the City of Lewes and the other governmental entities participating with the public agree in principle with the Plan and its recommendations, it must be understood that these same entities face many different and sometimes competing priorities, a changing regulatory framework, and funding challenges. As a result, the recommendations contained herein that are assigned to an entity for implementation may be implemented on a different schedule or in a different form than anticipated in the Corridor Management Plan or, due to unforeseen circumstances and regulatory requirements, not implemented at all. Nothing in this statement should be interpreted that any of the participating governmental entities are withholding support of any of the contents of the Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Entombed Voices
    ENTOMBED VOICES: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ESTABLISHED HISTORIES AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COUNTER-NARRATIVES WITHIN PUBLIC HISTORY by Francis Mahon A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree in Anthropology with Distinction Spring 2018 © 2018 Francis Mahon All Rights Reserved ENTOMBED VOICES: THE CONSTRUCTION OF ESTABLISHED HISTORIES AND THE IMPLEMENTATION OF COUNTER-NARRATIVES WITHIN PUBLIC HISTORY by Francis Mahon Approved: __________________________________________________________ Carla Guerrón Montero, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Monica Domínguez Torres, Ph.D. Committee member from the Department of Art History Approved: __________________________________________________________ Daniel Stevens, Ph. D. Committee member from the Board of Senior Thesis Readers Approved: __________________________________________________________ Michael Chajes, Ph.D. Chair of the University Committee on Student and Faculty Honors ACKNOWLEDGMENTS As mentioned in this undergraduate thesis, history is messy, and this thesis could have been very messy if it was not for some very helpful, patient, and caring friends, colleagues, and loved ones. Thank you first and foremost to my thesis committee, my third reader Dr. Daniel Stevens, my second reader Dr. Monica Domínguez-Torres, and finally my first reader Dr. Carla Guerrón-Montero. So much of the support, edits, and constructive criticism I received throughout this project came from Dr. Guerrón-Montero, an amazing Anthropologist who thankfully believed in my project, and was not angry when my drafts became increasingly longer, no matter how busy she was. Dr. Guerrón-Montero, thank you so much, I truly could not have completed this thesis without you! I would also like to acknowledge my family members and friends who never tired of hearing about monuments, alternative histories, and museums.
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware National Coastal Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Delaware National Coastal Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment November, 2008 Th is report has been prepared to provide Congress and the public with information about the resources in the study area and how they relate to criteria for inclusion within the national park system. Publication and transmittal of this report should not be considered an endorsement or a commitment by the National Park Service to seek or support either specifi c legislative authorization for the project or appropriation for its implementation. Authorization and funding for any new commitments by the National Park Service will have to be considered in light of competing priorities for existing units of the national park system and other programs. Th is report was prepared by the United States Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Northeast Region. For further information contact: National Park Service Division of Park Planning and Compliance 200 Chestnut Street Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 215.597.1848 Table of Contents S Executive Summary ................................................................. 1 Chapter One ............................................................................ 5 Study Purpose and Background Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Study Area ................................................................................................ 7 Study Process ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Gateway to the Nation Appendix 3: Nomination Application Delaware Breakwater Lighthouse
    Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Gateway to the Nation Appendix 3: Nomination Application Delaware Breakwater Lighthouse Lightship Overfalls Cape May - Lewes Ferry Canary Creek Hazell Smith House Fort Miles Prepared for: Pre-War Savannah Road Zwaanendael Museum CITY OF LEWES SUSSEX COUNTY OCTOBER 2015 DELAWARE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Prepared by: DELAWARE GREENWAYS Delaware Scenic and Historic Highway Nomination Application LEWES SCENIC AND HISTORIC BYWAY City of Lewes and Sussex County, Delaware Submitted to Delaware Department of Transportation Division of Planning Submitted by Delaware Greenways Inc. Sponsored by City of Lewes Mayor and Council Prepared by Delaware Greenways Inc. Mark A. Chura Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Ad‐Hoc Committee Helen Waite For City of Lewes Delaware Department of Transportation January 2009 This project was made possible through a grant from University of Delaware Sea Grant College Program LEWES SCENIC AND HISTORIC BYWAY TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 Project Overview 1.2 The Delaware Scenic and Historic Highways Program 1.3 The Lewes Scenic and Historic Byway Chapter 2 Description, Experience and Corridor Segments 2.1 Route Overview 2.2 Route Credentials and Character Gateways from Land 2.3 Segment 1 – Kings Highway Road 2.4 Segment 2 – Savannah Road 2.5 Segment 3 – New Road Gateways from the Sea 2.6 Segment 4 – Pilottown Road 2.7 Segment 5 – Gills Neck Road 2.8 Segment 6 – Cape Henlopen Drive Chapter 3 Intrinsic Qualities and Associated Resources 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Statement of Significance
    [Show full text]
  • Number of Resources Within Property
    NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 8-86) United States Department of the Interior ' \ l j National Park Service " 06 NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES REGISTRATION FORM 1. Name of Property historic name: Lewes Historic District, amended other name/site number: S-290_______________ 2. Location street & number: Pilottown Road, Shipcarpenter Street, Fourth Street, Savannah Road, McFee Street and Railroad Avenue______ not for publication: NA city/town: Lewes, Lewes and Rehoboth Hundred vicinity: NA state: DE county: Sussex___________ code: 005 zip code: 19958 3. Classification Ownership of Property: private, public-local and public-federal Category of Property: district___________________________ Number of Resources within Property: Contributing Noncontributing 637 112 buildings 5 17 sites 0 1 structures 0 0 objects 642 130 Total Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register: 122______________________________________________ Name of related multiple property listing: NA_________________ NPS Form 10-900-a OMB Approval No. 1024-0018 (8-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet Section number ——— Page ——— ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION APPROVAL Lewes Historic District NFS Form 10-900-a OMB No. 1024-0018 (8-86) « United States Department of the Interior National Park Service NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES CONTINUATION SHEET Section 8 Page 1-Amendment REGISTER name of multiple property listing AFRICAN-AMERICAN RESOURCES IN DELAWARE LEWES HISTORIC DISTRICT, S-290, LEWES, SUSSEX COUNTY, DELAWARE Eligibility Criterion: A Area of Significance: Social History Period of Significance: 1665-1942 Level of Significance: local While the Lewes Historic District is eligible for its architecture and for the social history embodied in its development and its history, it is also eligible for the small African-American community that is included within its boundaries at the north end of the town.
    [Show full text]