House Standing Committee Chairs: Rules Governing Selection Procedures
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Where's the Caucus?
Where's the Caucus? A Study of Minority Agenda Setting Behavior by LaShonda Marie Brenson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Political Science) in The University of Michigan 2016 Doctoral Committee: Professor Richard L. Hall, Co-Chair Professor Vincent L. Hutchings, Co-Chair Professor Robert W. Mickey Professor Alford A. Young c LaShonda Marie Brenson 2016 All Rights Reserved In the loving memory of Ella Ruth Brenson ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A number of individuals and organizations, in one way or another, extended their assistance in the preparation and completion of this dissertation, and for that, I am forever grateful. Nonetheless, I would be remiss if I did not mention the follow- ing persons and organizations without whom this dissertation would not have been possible. First, I give all honor and glory to my savior, Jesus. Without Him, I am nothing. Thank you for believing in me and being with me every step of the way. Second, I would like to thank my late mother, Ella Ruth Brenson, for the sacrifices you made for my siblings and I, but above all, thank you for introducing me to the unconditional love of Jesus. Your unexpected death during graduate school gave me the strength to keep going. I love you more than you'll ever know. Next, I would like to thank my dissertation committee for their unwavering sup- port and advice throughout the dissertation process. Rick and Vince, thank you for being a dynamic dual. Both of your personalities, expertise, and mentoring styles fit this dissertation project perfectly. -
1998 Regular Session
Telephone Directory and Committee Assignments of the Washington State Legislature Fifty-fifth Legislature 1998 Regular Session Washington State Senate Lt. Governor Brad Owen ... President of the Senate Irv Newhouse ........... President Pro Tempore Bob Morton ......... Vice President Pro Tempore Mike O'Connell .......... Secretary of the Senate Susan Carlson ..... Deputy Secretary of the Senate Dennis Lewis ................. Sergeant at Arms Washington State House of Representatives Clyde Ballard ............. Speaker of the House John Pennington ........... Speaker Pro Tempore Tim Martin ....................... Chief Clerk Sharon Hayward ............ Deputy Chief Clerk Washington State Senate Leadership and Committee Assignments Senate Caucus Officers 1998 Republican Caucus .......... , ..... Dan McDonald ................. George L. Sellar Majority Floor Leader ........ Stephen L. Johnson Majority Whip ................. Patricia S. Hale Majority Deputy Leader .......... Ann Anderson Caucus Vice Chair .............. Jeanine H. Long Majority Assistant Floor Leader ... Gary Strannigan Majority Assistant Whip ........... Dan Swecker ................. Sid Snyder Democratic Caucus Chair .... Valoria H. Loveland Democratic Floor Leader ......... Betti L. Sheldon ................ Rosa Franklin Democratic Caucus Vice Chair .... Pat Thibaudeau Democratic Assistant Floor Leader .. Calvin Goings Democratic Assistant Whip .......... Adam Kline Senate Standing Committees 1998 Membership of Senate Standing Committees Agriculture & Environment (7) Morton, -
2010 Post-Election Briefing US House of Representatives
2010 Post-Election Briefing US House of Representatives 111th Congress 112th Congress 255 Democrats 238 Republicans +60 178 Republicans 190 Democrats 2 vacancies Undecided: 7 seats © 2010 Venable LLP 2 Prospective House Leadership Speaker Minority Leader John Boehner (OH) Nancy Pelosi (CA) Majority Leader Minority Whip Eric Cantor (VA) Steny Hoyer (MD) Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy (CA) Assistant Leader Conference Chair James Clyburn (SC) Jeb Hensarling (TX) Caucus Chair Freshman Representative John Larson (CT) ? © 2010 Venable LLP 3 Prospective Chairman Prospective House Committees Ranking Member Agriculture Rep. Frank Lucas (R-OK) Rep. Collin Peterson (D-MN) Appropriations Rep. Jerry Lewis (R-CA) ? Rep. Hal Rogers (R-KY) Armed Services Rep. Buck McKeon (R-CA) ? Budget Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) ? Education and Labor Rep. John Kline (R-MN) Rep. George Miller (D-CA) Energy and Commerce Rep. Fred Upton (R-MI) Rep. Henry Waxman (D-CA) © 2010 Venable LLP 4 Prospective Chairman Prospective House Committees Ranking Member Financial Services Rep. Spencer Bachus (R-AL) Rep. Barney Frank (D-MA) Homeland Security Rep. Peter King (R-NY) Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) Judiciary Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) Oversight and Government Reform Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) Rep. Edolphus Towns (D-NY) Transportation Rep. John Mica (R-FL) ? Ways and Means Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI) Rep. Sandy Levin (D-MI) © 2010 Venable LLP 5 US Senate 111th Congress 112th Congress 57 Democrats 51 Democrats 41 Republicans 47 Republicans 2 Independents 2 Independents Undecided: • Alaska © 2010 Venable LLP 6 Prospective Senate Leadership Majority Leader Minority Leader Harry Reid (NV) Mitch McConnell (KY) Majority Whip Minority Whip Dick Durbin (IL) Jon Kyl (AZ) 7 Prospective Chairman Prospective Senate Committees Ranking Member Agriculture Sen. -
Internal Review Report for the Iowa Democratic Party 2020 Iowa Caucuses
INTERNAL REVIEW REPORT FOR THE IOWA DEMOCRATIC PARTY 2020 IOWA CAUCUSES November 10, 2020 Nick Klinefeldt David Yoshimura & Bonnie Campbell Campbell Law Firm TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 1 A. Engagement ........................................................................................................................................ 1 B. Process ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ....................................................................................................................................................... 1 A. History of the Iowa Caucuses .............................................................................................................. 1 B. How the Iowa Democratic Caucuses Work.......................................................................................... 2 Findings of Fact ................................................................................................................................................. 3 A. The IDP Delegate Selection Plan ........................................................................................................ 3 1. Unity Reform Commission Report ................................................................................................. 3 2. DNC Delegate Selection -
House Republican Caucus Elects Leadership For
November 16, 2020 – Issue 134 our nation forward by always answering the call of House Republican Caucus our constituents to face ever-evolving challenges. I Elects Leadership for 2021- am honored and inspired to join with these proven, principled and selfless public servants to continue to 22 Session answer the call to improve the lives of Pennsylvanians and stand humbled and ready to he Pennsylvania House Republican Caucus oversee another successful session." Tuesday elected its legislative leaders for the T 2021-22 Legislative Session. House Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff (R-Centre/Mifflin): "Led by our message of fiscal The leadership team consists of: responsibility, adding common sense to our COVID-19 response, and ensuring government is Speaker-designee Bryan Cutler (R-Lancaster). responsible to the people, the voters of Majority Leader Kerry Benninghoff (R- Pennsylvania have returned a significant Centre/Mifflin). Republican majority back to the Pennsylvania Majority Whip Donna Oberlander (R- General Assembly. I am proud to lead our caucus in Clarion/Armstrong/Forest). our ongoing mission to be the true voice of the Majority Appropriations Committee people and work to improve the lives of Chairman Stan Saylor (R-York). Pennsylvanians everywhere." Majority Policy Committee Chairman Marty Causer (R-Cameron/McKean/Potter). Majority Whip Donna Oberlander (R- Majority Caucus Chairman Mike Reese (R- Clarion/Armstrong/Forest): "Today's leadership Westmoreland/Somerset). election sends a strong message that we, as a caucus, are poised to use our growing strength in Majority Caucus Secretary Martina White (R- order to confront the challenges facing our Philadelphia). Commonwealth in the next two years," said Majority Caucus Administrator Kurt Masser Oberlander. -
Caucus and Conference: Party Organization in the U.S. House of Representatives
Caucus and Conference: Party Organization in the U.S. House of Representatives by Ronald M. Peters, Jr. Department of Political Science and Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center University of Oklahoma Prepared for delivery at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, Illinois April 25-28, 2002 Abstract The House Democratic Caucus and the House Republican Conference have witnessed both similarities and differences over the course of their respective histories. This paper traces the evolution of the two party organizations and examines their current operation. It is concluded that today they differ from each other in fundamental respects. The Democratic Caucus is a discussion forum. It is coalitional and internal in its focus. The Republican Conference is a public relations firm. It is ideological and external in its focus. Both party caucuses are affected by contextual variables. These include majority/minority status and party control of the White House. The most important factor shaping the two party organizations is party culture, which is shaped by each legislative party's previous history and by the two parties' respective constituency base. This examination of the two party caucuses has implications for theory. On the one hand, similarities in the pattern of meetings, participation by members, and occasional sponsorship of retreats and task forces lend credence to positive theories that seek nomothetic explanations of congressional behavior. On the other hand, the evident differences in the day-to-day operation of the two party organizations, the functions that these organizations perform, and the relationship in which they stand to the party leadership, suggest that any explanation will have to take into account inter-party variation. -
Whipped Party Discipline in Canada
Whipped Party Discipline in Canada ALEX MARLAND Communication, Strategy, and Politics Thierry Giasson and Alex Marland, Series Editors Contents List of Figures and Tables / ix Acknowledgments / xi List of Abbreviations / xiv Disambiguation / xvi 1 Party Discipline in Canada / 3 2 Representation / 38 3 Partisan Teams / 72 4 The Communications Arena / 105 5 Message Discipline / 125 6 Government Centralization / 157 7 Parliamentary Caucuses / 178 8 Caucus Research Bureaus / 204 9 Legislative Assemblies / 221 10 Managing Trouble / 253 11 The SNC-Lavalin Affair / 280 12 Advice for a New Parliamentarian / 319 viii Contents Appendix 1: Interview Participants / 347 Appendix 2: Interview Sampling and Recruitment / 356 Notes / 361 References / 403 Index / 443 1 Party Discipline in Canada Canadians should be proud. Canada is among the best places to live and boasts one of the world’s strongest democracies.1 High levels of freedom and low levels of government corruption are among the reasons why Canadians are some of the happiest citizens on Earth.2 Yet, if you look deeper than their pride in universal health care, in the maple leaf flag, or in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, you will discover frustration with the Gordian knot of party discipline.3 Political parties are essential actors with a reputation problem.4 World- wide, there is democratic malaise, and trust in public institutions, polit- icians, and political parties is eroding. Party memberships, once a source of pride, have become a mechanism for party operatives to collect personal information for the database marketing that fuels polarization. In democ- racies using the Westminster parliamentary system, such as Canada, power is concentrated in executive offices, and partisanship infuses impartial public administration. -
How Caucuses and Sequential Elections Improve The
chapter three Iowa Caucus Rules I have never understood the Iowa caucus. — Larry King, CNN he Iowa caucuses are among the most commented-on political Tevents in the world. Whenever there is a competitive presidential nomination for either major party, candidates, reporters, and pundits all leave their comfortable East Coast and West Coast haunts and be- gin camping out in Middle America, a place that many have never vis- ited. And while Iowans (and some others) actively defend the caucus as a shining example of grassroots democracy, others charge that cau- cuses are archaic, arcane, and unrepresentative. The New York Times (2003) once called them “quaint.” Others have been less kind. Over the years the Iowa caucuses have been characterized as “dominated by spe- cial interests” (Wilgoren and Swarns 2004, writing about Howard Dean), “indecipherable chicanery” (Lane 2008), and a “mind- numbingly com- plex system” (Fund 2007). In an article at Slate.com, commentator Jeff Greenfi eld (2007) takes the state of Iowa itself to task for suppressing turnout, since it requires participants to show up in person at a specifi c time of day and stay for a lengthy period of time. He also criticizes Dem- ocrats’ caucus rules for violating precepts of one person, one vote. As we begin our look at Iowa, we want to reiterate our basic point that the rules governing presidential nominations are important. In the case of Iowa, both the sequential voting rules that place Iowa fi rst in the cur- rent nomination schedule and its use of a caucus process rather than a primary election matter by shaping candidates’ campaign strategy, voter participation, and media coverage. -
Congressional Leadership in the 116Th Congress Background
Congressional Leadership in the 116th Congress Background Leadership of the House and Senate will meet to determine committee assignments and committee leadership for the 116th Congress. Committee compositions depend on the majority parties in each Chamber, ratio of the majority to minority, leadership negotiations, and House and Senate leadership elections. In the House, eight incumbent committee chairmen are retiring. Republican-imposed term-limits on committee chairmen resulted in five of theretiring members unable to seek another term as chair. The House Republican Conference ratified Committee Ranking Member positions on November 30. In the Senate, Republican retirements have led to open leadership positions on the Foreign Relations and Finance Committees. Democratic leadership changes have been shaped by the loss of Sens. Bill Nelson (D-FL), Heidi Heitkamp (D-ND) and Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO). 1 House Party Leadership Speaker of the House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (CA-05) Kevin McCarthy (CA-23) Majority Leader Minority Whip Steny Hoyer (MD-05) Steve Scalise (LA-01) Majority Whip Republican Conference Chair Jim Clyburn (SC-06) Liz Cheney (WY-AL) Assistant Democratic Leader Republican Conference Vice Chair Ben Ray Lujan (NM-03) Mark Walker (NC-06) Democratic Caucus Chair Republican Policy Committee Chair Hakeem Jeffries (NY-08) Gary Palmer (AL-06) Democratic Caucus Vice Chair NRCC Chair Katherine Clark (MA-05) Tom Emmer (MN-06) DCCC Chair Cheri Bustos (IL-17) 2 House Committee Leadership Procedures Democratic Caucus Procedures Republican Conference Procedures The Democratic Steering and Policy Committee nominates Chairmen, subject to approval to the The Republican Steering Committee nominates Ranking Members, subject to approval to entire Democratic Caucus, with the exception of three committees. -
Constitution of the Iowa Democratic Party
Constitution of the Iowa Democratic Party As amended on June 16th, 2018 Preamble We, the people of the Iowa Democratic Party, in order to organize and perpetuate a representative, effective, and responsible party organization in the State of Iowa, advance the interests of the Democratic Party nationally, sustain and advance the principles of social justice and democracy, and uphold civil rights, civil liberties, and constitutional government, do establish this Constitution of the Iowa Democratic Party. Article I - Name and Membership Section 1 - Name This organization shall be known as the Iowa Democratic Party. Section 2 - Eligibility to Participate All persons at least 18 years of age as of the date of the next General Election who are residents of Iowa, who support the purposes of the Iowa Democratic Party, and who are registered Democrats, or who register at the time of their request to participate in the process in question as Democrats, shall be eligible to participate as members of this organization. Section 3 - Young Persons All young persons who are not eligible to vote in the next General Election, who are residents of Iowa, and who support the purposes of the Democratic Party of Iowa shall 1 be eligible to participate as full party members except for voting and holding of elective positions within the party, or as restricted by Iowa law. Section 4 - Members Unless specifically denied such right by law, all members of the Iowa Democratic Party shall be eligible to participate in all activities of the Party; shall be eligible -
A Precinct Chair's Guide to Organizing the Iowa Caucuses
THE IOWA CAUCUS First in the Nation A PRECINCT CHAIR'S GUIDE TO ORGANIZING THE IOWA CAUCUSES The Republican Party of Iowa 621 E. 9th St Des Moines, IA 50309 515-282-8105 www.iowagop.org Table of Contents 3-4 _____________________ Pre-Caucus Preparation Checklist 5 _____________________________ Caucus Agenda Overview 6 _________________________ How to Use the Sign-In Sheets 7 ______________ Same-Day Voter Registration: How It Works 8 ___________________________ Frequently Asked Questions 9-14 _________________ Step-by-Step Caucus Guide and Script 2016 Iowa GOP Precinct Chair Manual Page | 2 Temporary Chair Caucus Preparation Attend a County Caucus Training. Make sure you have the contact information of the County Chair or County Caucus Coordinator. Make sure you have a Caucus Secretary and a Presidential Poll Reporter with a smartphone, tablet, or computer to report the results of your precinct vote using the Caucus Reporting Application. Arrive at your precinct caucus location no later than 5:00 P.M. Familiarize yourself with your caucus site (size, chairs, tables, etc.). You may need to make signs that direct attendees to the appropriate room(s). Caucus business begins promptly at 7:00 P.M. You should be prepared to check-in attendees no later than 5:45 P.M. Be prepared to conduct several votes. Make sure you have all the caucus materials your county caucus coordinator has provided you. You will need: Ballots Pencils/Pens Signs for Directing Caucus-goers Voter Registration Forms A, B, C, D, and E Forms Caucus Check-In List Chairs and Tables for Check-In County Lincoln Bags for Donations Caucus Script Platform Papers Cell Phone Internet Connection or Telephone Reception Caucus Secretary An approved Poll Reporter with a smartphone, tablet, or computer with the Caucus Reporting Application downloaded. -
Updated November 23, 2020
Updated November 23, 2020 1 Executive office of the President (EOP) The Executive Office of the President (EOP) comprises the offices and agencies that support the work of the president at the center of the executive branch of the United States federal government. To provide the President with the support that he or she needs to govern effectively, the Executive Office of the President (EOP) was created in 1939 by President Franklin D. Roosevelt. The EOP has responsibility for tasks ranging from communicating the President’s message to the American people to promoting our trade interests abroad. The EOP is also referred to as a 'permanent government', with many policy programs, and the people who implement them, continuing between presidential administrations. This is because there is a need for qualified, knowledgeable civil servants in each office or agency to inform new politicians. With the increase in technological and global advancement, the size of the White House staff has increased to include an array of policy experts to effectively address various fields. There are about 4,000 positions in the EOP, most of which do not require confirmation from the U.S. Senate. Senior staff within the Executive Office of the President have the title Assistant to the President, second-level staff have the title Deputy Assistant to the President, and third-level staff have the title Special Assistant to the President. The core White House staff appointments, and most Executive Office officials generally, are not required to be confirmed by the U.S. Senate, although there are a handful of exceptions (e.g., the Director of the Office of Management and Budget, the Chair and members of the Council of Economic Advisers, and the United States Trade Representative).