DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft EIS/EIR Appendix L West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Construction Methods Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft EIS/EIR Appendix L West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Construction Methods Report Draft EIS/EIR Appendix L Final Construction Methods Report WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Appendix L Final Construction Methods Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: WSP USA, Inc. 444 South Flower Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90071 June 2021 Authors AUTHORS Kristin Carlson, WSP Gina Escalante, WSP Alana Flaherty, WSP Spencer Jaeger, WSP Nathan Maack, WSP Luke Yang, WSP Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Alternatives Evaluation, Screening and Selection Process .................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Purpose and Structure .............................................................................. 1-2 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................. 2-1 2.1 Geographic Sections............................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.1 Northern Section .................................................................................. 2-5 2.1.2 Southern Section .................................................................................. 2-6 2.2 No Build Alternative ............................................................................................. 2-6 2.3 Build Alternatives ................................................................................................. 2-9 2.3.1 Proposed Alignment Configuration for the Build Alternatives .............. 2-9 2.3.2 Alternative 1: Los Angeles Union Station to Pioneer Station .............. 2-12 2.3.3 Alternative 2: 7th Street/Metro Center to Pioneer Station................... 2-15 2.3.4 Alternative 3: Slauson/A (Blue) Line to Pioneer Station ...................... 2-15 2.3.5 Alternative 4: I-105/C (Green) Line to Pioneer Station ........................ 2-15 2.3.6 Design Options................................................................................... 2-16 2.3.7 Maintenance and Storage Facility ....................................................... 2-16 2.3.8 Bellflower MSF Option........................................................................ 2-16 2.3.9 Paramount MSF Option ..................................................................... 2-16 3 REGULATORY FRAMEWORK .......................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Federal .................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.2 State ..................................................................................................................... 3-2 3.3 Local and Regional ............................................................................................... 3-2 4 CONSTRUCTION METHODS/AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT .......................................... 4-1 4.1 Construction Sequencing and Duration ............................................................... 4-1 4.2 Utility Relocation .................................................................................................. 4-9 4.3 Freight Relocation .............................................................................................. 4-16 4.4 At-Grade Construction Activities ........................................................................ 4-17 4.4.1 Guideway ............................................................................................ 4-17 4.4.2 Construction Methods within Rail ROW ............................................. 4-17 4.4.3 Construction Methods within City Streets .......................................... 4-17 4.4.4 Street Reconfiguration and Reconstruction ........................................ 4-18 4.4.5 Stations ............................................................................................... 4-18 4.4.6 Parking Facilities ................................................................................. 4-19 4.4.7 Maintenance and Storages Facility ..................................................... 4-19 4.5 Aerial Construction Activities ............................................................................. 4-20 4.5.1 Guideway ............................................................................................ 4-20 4.5.2 River Crossings ................................................................................... 4-22 4.5.3 Retained Fill Guideway ........................................................................ 4-22 4.5.4 Stations ............................................................................................... 4-23 4.5.5 Slauson/A Line Station ....................................................................... 4-24 4.6 Underground Construction Activities ................................................................. 4-24 4.6.1 Twin Bore Tunnel ................................................................................ 4-24 4.6.2 Cut-and-Cover Construction ............................................................... 4-25 4.6.3 Sequential Excavation Method ............................................................ 4-29 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project Final Construction Methods Report June 2021 | i Table of Contents 4.7 Freeway Crossings .............................................................................................. 4-30 4.7.1 I-105 .................................................................................................... 4-31 4.8 Other Construction Activities .............................................................................. 4-33 4.8.1 Systems ............................................................................................... 4-33 4.8.2 Train Control House ............................................................................ 4-36 4.8.3 Overhead Catenary Systems ................................................................ 4-36 4.8.4 Temporary Street and Lane Closures................................................... 4-36 4.8.5 Staging Areas ...................................................................................... 4-52 4.8.6 Haul Routes ........................................................................................ 4-55 4.8.7 Excavated Materials ............................................................................. 4-55 5 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................... 5-1 Tables Table 2.1. No Build Alternative – Existing Transportation Network and Planned Improvements ................................................................................................................... 2-7 Table 2.2. Summary of Build Alternative Components ............................................................ 2-9 Table 4.1. General Sequence of Construction Activities and Equipment in the Northern and Southern Sections ...................................................................................................... 4-2 Table 4.2. Major Utility Conflicts ............................................................................................ 4-10 Table 4.3. Freight Relocation ................................................................................................. 4-16 Table 4.4. Proposed TPSS Locations (North to South) .......................................................... 4-33 Table 4.5. Construction Related Closures by Jurisdiction ....................................................... 4-38 Table 4.6. Staging Areas......................................................................................................... 4-53 Table 4.7. Excavation Calculations ......................................................................................... 4-55 West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project ii | June 2021 Final Construction Methods Report Table of Contents Figures Figure 2-1. Project Alternatives ................................................................................................ 2-2 Figure 2-2. Project Alignment by Alignment Type.................................................................... 2-4 Figure 2-3. Northern Section ................................................................................................... 2-5 Figure 2-4. Southern Section ................................................................................................... 2-6 Figure 2-5. Freeway Crossings ............................................................................................... 2-10 Figure 2-6. Existing Rail Right-of-Way Ownership and Relocation ......................................... 2-11 Figure 2-7. Maintenance and Storage Facility Options .......................................................... 2-17 Figure 4-1. Northern Section Project Configurations............................................................... 4-7 Figure 4-2. Southern Section Project Configurations ............................................................... 4-8 Figure 4-3. Typical Cross Section of an At-Grade Guideway with Embedded Track ............... 4-18 Figure 4-4. At-Grade LRT Station ........................................................................................... 4-19 Figure 4-5. Typical Cross Section of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • El Monte Station Connections Foothilltransit.Org
    metro.net El Monte Station Connections foothilltransit.org BUSWAY 10 Greyhound Foothill Transit El Monte Station Upper Level FT Silver Streak Discharge Only FT486 FT488 FT492 Eastbound Metro ExpressLanes Walk-in Center Discharge 24 25 26 27 28 Only Bus stop for: 23 EMT Red, EMT Green EMS Civic Ctr Main Entrance Upper Level Bus Bays for All Service B 29 22 21 20 19 18 Greyhound FT481 FT Silver Streak Metro Silver Line Metro Bike Hub FT494 Westbound RAMONA BL RAMONA BL A Bus stop for: EMS Flair Park (am/pm) Metro Parking Structure Division 9 Building SANTA ANITA AV El Monte Station Lower Level 1 Bus Bay A Bus Stop (on street) 267 268 487 190 194 FT178 FT269 FT282 2 Metro Rapid 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Bus Bay 577X Metro Silver Line 8 18 Bus Bay Lower Level Bus Bays Elevator 76 Escalator 17 Bike Rail 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EMS Bike Parking 270 176 Discharge Only Commuter 770 70 Connection Parking Building 13-0879 ©2012 LACMTA DEC 2012 Subject to Change Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Destinations Lines Bus Bay or Street Stop Street Stop Street Stop 7th St/Metro Center Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Hacienda Heights FT282 16 Pershing Square Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line , 70, 76, 770, 1 2 17 18 37th St/USC Transitway Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 FT Silver Streak 19 20 21 Harbor Fwy Metro Rail Station Metro Silver Line 18 19 Pomona TransCenter ÅÍ FT Silver Streak 28 Alhambra 76, 176 6 17 Highland Park 176 6 Altadena 267, 268 9 10 Puente Hills Mall FT178, FT282 14 16 Industry Å 194, FT282 13 16 Arcadia 268,
    [Show full text]
  • California Mobility Investment Opportunities
    CALIFORNIA MOBILITY INVESTMENT OPPORTUNITIES Report Contributors This report was prepared for the Commission in partnership with the organizations listed below. Without their contributions this report would not have been possible. Alpine County Local Transportation Commission Amador County Transportation Commission Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments Calaveras Council of Governments California Association of Councils of Government California Department of Transportation California State Association of Counties California Transit Association County of San Benito Council of Governments Del Norte Local Transportation Commission Fresno Council of Governments Humboldt County Association of Governments Imperial County Transportation Commission Inyo County Local Transportation Commission Kern Council of Governments Kings County Association of Governments Lake County/City Area Planning Council League of California Cities Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Madera County Transportation Commission Mendocino Council of Governments Merced County Association of Governments Metropolitan Transportation Commission Modoc County Transportation Commission Mono County Local Transportation Commission Nevada County Transportation Commission North State Super-Region Orange County Transportation Authority Riverside County Transportation Commission Sacramento Area Council of Governments San Bernardino County Transportation Authority San Diego Association of Governments San Joaquin Council of Governments San Luis Obispo Council of
    [Show full text]
  • Mayor Eric Garcetti Announces Collaboration with Microsoft And
    A-14 LASENTINEL.NET NEWS THURSDAY, OCTOBER 15, 2020 Mayor Eric Garcetti announces Collaboration with Microsoft and Starry, Six Months of Free Internet Looking to Connect the Los Angeles Community BY BETTI HALSELL what was already a clear and communities. The lack of holds do not have a broad- President of Microsoft efficiently. The CEO and Co- Contributing Writer unmistakable fact: internet broadband networks can lead band subscription according Brad Smith stated, “This founder of Starry Chet Kano- connectivity is not a luxury in to less education, narrow to the mayor’s office. partnership with the City of jia stated, “We built our com- Working hard to close our time — it’s an absolute awareness, and disconnection This initiative is one of Los Angeles and Starry is an pany on the basic belief that racial gaps in opportunity, necessity for parents trying to to the rest of the world. many seeds planted and that important step towards ensur- everyone deserves access to Los Angeles City Mayor Eric work, students looking to Mayor Garcetti recognized took root from the Mayor’s ing that everyone, every- affordable, high-quality Garcetti announced a new learn, and families and the misstep among the city monthly Telecommunica- where can access today’s broadband no matter where directive to provide six friends seeking to communi- and now he has the footing to tions and Digital Equity essential online services.” you live...” months of free internet access cate.” Garcetti Continued, invest in a solution. The Forum. The city has seen the Smith continued. “…If we This is a coalition to residents in four public “With Starry and Microsoft effects of COVID-19 worked generosity from Starry Inter- fail to bring it to more people, between the Los Angeles housing communities across lending their resources and as high definition projector, net before back in June of this we risk widening, not closing City Mayor Administration, the city.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Service Plan
    Attachment A 1 Core Network Key spines in the network Highest investment in customer and operations infrastructure 53% of today’s bus riders use one of these top 25 corridors 2 81% of Metro’s bus riders use a Tier 1 or 2 Convenience corridor Network Completes the spontaneous-use network Focuses on network continuity High investment in customer and operations infrastructure 28% of today’s bus riders use one of the 19 Tier 2 corridors 3 Connectivity Network Completes the frequent network Moderate investment in customer and operations infrastructure 4 Community Network Focuses on community travel in areas with lower demand; also includes Expresses Minimal investment in customer and operations infrastructure 5 Full Network The full network complements Muni lines, Metro Rail, & Metrolink services 6 Attachment A NextGen Transit First Service Change Proposals by Line Existing Weekday Frequency Proposed Weekday Frequency Existing Saturday Frequency Proposed Saturday Frequency Existing Sunday Frequency Proposed Sunday Frequency Service Change ProposalLine AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late AM PM Late Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl Peak Midday Peak Evening Night Owl R2New Line 2: Merge Lines 2 and 302 on Sunset Bl with Line 200 (Alvarado/Hoover): 15 15 15 20 30 60 7.5 12 7.5 15 30 60 12 15 15 20 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 20 20 20 30 30 60 12 12 12 15 30 60 •E Ğǁ >ŝŶĞϮǁ ŽƵůĚĨŽůůŽǁ ĞdžŝƐƟŶŐ>ŝŶĞƐϮΘϯϬϮƌŽƵƚĞƐŽŶ^ƵŶƐĞƚůďĞƚǁ
    [Show full text]
  • MTA Agenda Item #4.1 Long Range Transportation Plan/Draft Potential
    Attachment A Proposed One-Half Cent Sales Tax for Transportation ATTACHMENT A Outline of Expenditure Categories DRAFT 40-Years: Fiscal Year (FY ) 2018 - 2057, Escalated Dollars (millions) % of First First 15 Second 15 Final 10 Sales Tax 40-Year Subfund Program Year Year Year Year (net of Amount* Amount Period Period Period Admin) Local Return Local Return (Local Projects and Transit 16%$ 136 2,610$ 7,480$ 9,090$ $ 19,180 Services) Highway Construction (includes 2% System Asset Highway, Projects - Ports Highway 17%$ 144 3,420$ 8,100$ 8,810$ $ 20,400 Active Congestion Programs, Goods Transportation, Movement) Complete Streets Metro Active Transportation Program (Capital) 2%$ 17 $ 470 940$ 980$ 2,400$ (Bicycle, Pedestrian, Complete Streets) Transit Construction (Includes Transit, 2% System Asset Projects - 35%$ 296 12,140$ 10,096$ 19,665$ $ 41,900 Airports and Transit Stations) First/Last Mile (Capital) Metro State of Good Repair 2%$ 17 $ 350 910$ $ 1,140 $ 2,400 Metro Rail Operations 5%$ 42 820$ 2,300$ 2,860$ $ 5,980 Transit Operations 20%$ 169 3,270$ 9,340$ 11,380$ $ 23,990 Transit (Metro & Municipal Providers) Operating & Maintenance ADA Paratransit for the disabled; Metro discounts for 2%$ 17 $ 350 960$ $ 1,090 $ 2,400 seniors and students Regional Rail 1%$ 8 180$ 460$ 560$ 1,200$ TOTAL PROGRAMS $ 847 23,610$ 40,586$ 55,575$ 119,850$ 1.5% for Administration 1.50%$ 13 354$ 609$ 834$ $ 1,800 GRAND TOTAL $ 860 23,964$ 41,195$ 56,409$ 121,650$ * All totals are rounded; numbers presented in this document may not always add up to the totals provided.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 23, 2019 Shows a Map of the Corridor and Study Area, Which Includes One-Half Mile to Either Side of Verm�:Mt Avenue
    AUGUST 23, 2019 shows a map of the corridor and study area, which includes one-half mile to either side of Verm�:mt Avenue. The three potential.rail concepts include: 1) Light Rail Transit (LRT), 2) Heavy Rail Transit (HRT) with a direct connection to the Red Line; and 3) HRT with stand-alone operation (beginning/ending at Vermont/Wilshire). Because the cost of each rail alternative far exceeds the Measure M funding, staffinitially recommended advancing three BRT alternatives into environmental review. However, the April Board motion directed staffto also advance the three rail concepts into environmental review to preserve the ability to deliver rail transit should additional funding materialize. The motion also directed staff to include a feasibility study of extending the Vermont Transit Corridor to the South Bay Silver Line Pacific Coast Highway (PCH) transitway station to ensure regional connectivity. Environmental Review and South Bay Feasibility Study In order to address the April 25, 2019 Board motion, staffis developing separate procurement documents to conduct two parallel studies. Given the importance of the Vermont Transit Corridor and desire to meet the Measure M opening date, staff will proceed with advancing the three BRT and three rail alternatives between Hollywood Boulevard and 120th Street into environmental review. This effortis anticipated to take approximately 24 months from contract award through completion of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The six alternatives being studied in the EIR include: 1) End-to-end side-running BRT 2) Combination side- and center-running BRT 3) End-to-end center-running BRT (including possible grade separation) 4) LRT 5) HRT with direct connection to Red Line 6) HRT stand-alone service (beginning/ending at Vermont/Wilshire) The second study assesses the feasibility of extending the BRT and rail alternatives 10 miles from 120th Street to the South Bay Silver Line PCH transitwaystation.
    [Show full text]
  • West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor Project
    Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report WEST SANTA ANA BRANCH TRANSIT CORRIDOR PROJECT Draft EIS/EIR Appendix F Final Safety and Security Impact Analysis Report Prepared for: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Prepared by: WSP 444 South Flower Street Suite 800 Los Angeles, California 90071 July 2021 Authors AUTHORS Charlie Hetland, Jacobs John Simon, Jacobs Ryo Nagai, Jacobs Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Study Background ................................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Alternatives Evaluation, Screening and Selection Process .................................... 1-1 1.3 Report Purpose and Structure .............................................................................. 1-2 1.4 General Background ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.4.1 Safety .................................................................................................... 1-3 1.4.2 Security ................................................................................................. 1-4 1.4.3 Impact Criteria and Thresholds ............................................................ 1-5 1.5 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 1-6 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis LAOG1094
    PM Conformity Hot Spot Analysis – Project Summary for Interagency Consultation RTIP ID#: LAOG1094 The West Santa Ana Branch Transit Corridor (Project) is currently programmed in the Federal Transportation Improvement Program as Study Only and funding is provided for preliminary engineering. The Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority (Metro) is seeking a Record of Decision (ROD) on an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) from the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), although federal funding has not been fully programmed. Metro anticipates that a ROD will facilitate the pursuit of federal funds. Importantly, the Conformity Determination is required by FTA prior to circulation of the Draft EIS. Public review of the EIS is anticipated for mid-2021. TCWG Consideration Date: January 26, 2021 Project Description Metro, in cooperation with FTA, is proposing an electrically powered light rail transit (LRT) line that would extend up to 19 miles from downtown Los Angeles through southeast Los Angeles County. The Project location is shown in Figure 1. The Project would provide reliable, fixed-guideway transit service that would increase mobility and connectivity for historically underserved, transit-dependent, and environmental justice communities; reduce travel times on local and regional transportation networks; and accommodate substantial future employment and population growth. The Project includes four Build Alternatives that would extend from different termini in the north to the same terminus in the City of Artesia in the south. These Build Alternatives are as follows: • Alternative 1: Los Angeles Union Station (LAUS) to Pioneer Station; the northern terminus would be located underground at LAUS Forecourt. This alignment length would be 19.3 miles and include 11 stations and 22 traction power substations (TPSS).
    [Show full text]
  • BNSF Harbor Subdivision
    South Bay Cities Railroad Study BNSF Harbor Subdivision Final Report Prepared for: Southern California Association of Governments In Coordination with South Bay Cities Council of Governments The preparation of this report was financed in part through grants from the United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration – under provisions of the Transportation Equity Act of the 21st Century. Additional financial assistance was provided by the California State Department of Transportation. Prepared by: Wilbur Smith Associates Schiermeyer Consulting Services Cheryl Downey February 28, 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary Project Overview .................................................................................................... ES-1 How the Study was done......................................................................................... ES-1 Recommendations................................................................................................... ES-2 Next Steps ............................................................................................................... ES-2 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the Study........................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 Study Process................................................................................................... 1-2 1.3 Agencies Consulted.......................................................................................... 1-3 1.4 Legal Framework
    [Show full text]
  • Metro Program Management Master Schedule June 2019
    j Metro Program Management Master Schedule June 2019 FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY FY Type Project Name 20182018 20192019 20202020 20212021 20222022 20232023 20242024 20252025 20262026 20272027 20282028 20292029 20302030 20312031 20322032 20332033 20342034 20352035 20362036 20372037 20382038 20392039 20402040 20412041 20422042 20432043 20442044 20452045 20462046 20472047 20482048 20492049 20502050 20512051 20522052 20532053 20542054 20552055 20562056 20572057 20582058 20592059 20602060 20612061 20622062 20632063 20642064 20652065 20662066 20672067 20682068 20692069 20702070 Transit Rail Crenshaw/LAX Transit Corridor Regional Connector Transit Corridor Westside Purple Line Extension Section 1 Westside Purple Line Extension Section 2 Westside Purple Line Extension Section 3 Gold Line Foothill Extension Phase 2B (Phase 1 & 2) West Santa Ana Transit Corridor LRT (Phase 1 & 2) East SF Valley Transit Corridor Project Green Line Extension to Crenshaw Blvd in Torrance Eastside Transit Corridor Phase 2 (Align 1 & 2) Sepulveda Phases 2 & 3 Crenshaw Northern Extension Green Line Eastern Extension (Norwalk) Orange Line Conversion to Light Rail Transit BRT Orange Line Grade Separations North Hollywood to Pasadena BRT North San Fernando Valley BRT Improvements Vermont Transit Corridor Lincoln BRT Corridor Transit Airport Metro Connector Facilities Link Union Station Highway I-5 Carmenita Road Interchange Congestion Relief I-5 North Capacity Enhancements SR-134-SR-118 I-5 South Capacity Enhancements I-605 to Orange County I-5 N Cap.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Register Here
    TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS ADVISORY COUNCIL (TBAC) WEB BASED / ONLINE GENERAL MEETING Thursday, June 3, 2021 Meeting Time: 9:30 a.m. - 11:30 a.m. AGENDA REGISTER HERE: https://tbacgeneralmeeting6-2021.eventbrite.com During this current period of minimizing health risks and promoting personal and regional safety, we are providing web based online meetings per Mayor Garcetti’s “Safer at Home” order. The purpose of this meeting is to share information that may be helpful in supporting small and diverse businesses as TBAC serves in an advisory role to Metro. Please click on the link above to join the discussion at the listed time. This is a free online meeting and it is always open to the public. Please note that the link above is the official link to register for the meeting. Do not register through any other links. # Topic and Presenter(s) Purpose and Process I Call to Order, Chair S. Rourk II Safety & Security Briefing, Metro Introductions may be modified during online meetings. Welcome and Introductions, Chair S. Rourk Metro Quorum Confirmation, Secretary TBD Voting Members: Organization Info & Introduction Packet Review & Code of Conduct, Exec Committee Nonvoting Members: Introduction & Process and Procedures, Exec Committee Organization Represented Executive Committee: Introductions Welcome to New General Public Attendees III Metro Chair Representative California Public Utilities Code (PUC) Division 12 Chapter 2 130051.19.(c) IV Chair Comments, Chair S. Rourk V Meeting Minutes Review and Approve Review & approve May 2021 Online Meeting Minutes VI Metro Contracting Opportunities All may inquire Procurement/Contract Look-Ahead Questions must adhere to upcoming contract All Areas: Construction/Professional opportunities.
    [Show full text]
  • Planning and Programming Committee Agenda
    Metro Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority One Gateway Plaza 3rd Floor Board Room Los Angeles, CA Agenda - Final Wednesday, November 14, 2018 2:00 PM One Gateway Plaza, Los Angeles, CA 90012, 3rd Floor, Metro Board Room Planning and Programming Committee Jacquelyn Dupont-Walker, Chair Mark Ridley-Thomas, Vice Chair Mike Bonin Janice Hahn Ara Najarian John Bulinski, non-voting member Phillip A. Washington, Chief Executive Officer METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY BOARD RULES (ALSO APPLIES TO BOARD COMMITTEES) PUBLIC INPUT A member of the public may address the Board on agenda items, before or during the Board or Committee’s consideration of the item for one (1) minute per item, or at the discretion of the Chair. A request to address the Board should be submitted in person at the meeting to the Board Secretary . Individuals requesting to speak on more than three (3) agenda items will be allowed to speak up to a maximum of three (3) minutes per meeting. For individuals requiring translation service, time allowed will be doubled. Notwithstanding the foregoing, and in accordance with the Brown Act, this agenda does not provide an opportunity for members of the public to address the Board on any Consent Calendar agenda item that has already been considered by a Committee, composed exclusively of members of the Board, at a public meeting wherein all interested members of the public were afforded the opportunity to address the Committee on the item, before or during the Committee’s consideration of the item, and which has not been substantially changed since the Committee heard the item.
    [Show full text]