The Retinal Fate of Xenopus Cleavage Stage Progenitors Is Dependent Upon Blastomere Position and Competence: Studies of Normal and Regulated Clones
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Journal of Neuroscience, August 1993, f3(8): 31933210 The Retinal Fate of Xenopus Cleavage Stage Progenitors Is Dependent upon Blastomere Position and Competence: Studies of Normal and Regulated Clones Sen Huang and Sally A. Moody DeDartment of Anatomv and Neuroscience Proaram, The George Washington University Medical Center, Washington, D.6. 20037 The clonal origin of the stage 43-44 Xenopus retina from neighbors. This result suggests that dorsal-animal blasto- cleavage stage precursors was quantitatively assessed with meres change positional values in only one direction (dorsal lineage tracing techniques. The retina descends from a spe- to vegetal) after neighbor cell deletion, and that retinal fate cific subset of those blastomeres that form forebrain. The is dictated by blastomere position. To test this hypothesis most animal dorsal midline cell (Dl .l. 1) produced about half directly, different ventral and vegetal blastomeres, which of the retina, the three other dorsal ipsilateral blastomeres normally do not produce retina, were transplanted to the each produce about an eighth of the retina, and the four position of D 1.1.1. The progeny of ventral equatorial blas- contralateral dorsal blastomeres and an ipsilateral ventral- tomeres (Vl .1.2 and V2.1.2) populated the retina in a pattern animal cell together produce the remaining eighth of the that was indistinguishable from that of normal Dl. 1 .l, show- retina. There was no significant spatial segregation of the ing that position in the cleavage stage embryo is an important clones derived from different progenitors in either the an- determinant of retinal lineage. However, progeny of trans- terior-posterior or dorsal-ventral axes of the retina and no planted ventral- or dorsal-vegetal pole blastomeres (V2.1 .l boundaries between clones were observed. Instead, the and D2.1 .l) never populated the retina, demonstrating that clones intermixed to form multiple radial subclones that were not all blastomeres are competent to form retina. equivalent to those demonstrated by marking optic vesicle [Key words: Xenopus laevis, retina, determination, fegu- progenitor cells (Holt et al., 1988; Wetts and Fraser, 1988). lation, competence, transplantation] This mosaic pattern was initiated by the beginning of gas- trulation, advanced in the neural plate, and virtually complete The mechanismsby which a multipotent embryonic cell is de- in the optic vesicle. At optic vesicle stages cell movement termined to become one particular neuronal cell type is poorly within subclones was restricted, resulting in the formation understood in vertebrates, but it is generally believed that com- of lineally related columns of cells in the mature retina. mitment to a particular CNS phenotype occurs in a complex To determine if the blastomere progenitors are determined seriesof cellular decisionsthat affect the developmental poten- to produce these retinal lineage patterns, the major retinal tial of progenitor cells and the specific phenotypes of their prog- progenitor (D1.l.l) was deleted bilaterally. About 80% of eny (reviewed by Jacobson, 199 1; McConnell, 1991). There are the tadpoles developed normal-appearing eyes; of these the several examplesindicating that the developmental potential of retinas in two-thirds were normal in size and the rest were neuronal progenitors is gradually restricted. Cell lineage in ze- smaller. The blastomeres surrounding the deleted Dl .l .l brafish becomestissue specific during gastrulation, but becomes progenitors changed their contributions to retina in different cell type specific later (Kimmel and Warga, 1986). Cortical neu- ways to effect a complete or partial restoration. Ventral blas- rons become committed to a laminar fate at the time of their tomeres, which normally contribute mainly to the tail, pro- final mitotic division, but are not committed to a particular cell duced substantial amounts of the retina while dorsal blas- type until later (McConnell, 1991). In the retina, progenitors tomeres, which normally contribute mainly to the head, may first be restricted to produce cells in certain regions (Wil- decreased their contribution to the retina. To determine liams and Goldowitz, 1992) and then, perhaps as late as the whether these changes in retinal lineage were due to changes terminal mitosis (Turner and Cepko, 1987; Holt et al., 1988) in blastomere position after the surgery, various other blas- to produce particular cell types. tomeres were deleted prior to lineage mapping. Dorsal-an- Since the retina is accessibleto lineage tracing techniques imal blastomeres took over the retinal fate of their dorsal- during development, and is composed of a variety of easily vegetal neighbors after those neighbors were deleted, but identifiable cell types that are arranged in a highly ordered spa- did not change fate after the deletion of their ventral-animal tial pattern, it has served as a model for understanding the relationship between cell lineage and cell type determination in Received Oct. 9, 1992; revised Feb. 16, 1993; accepted Mar.. 1, 1993. the nervous system. Labeling of mitotic precursor cells in the This work was supported by NIH Grants NS23 158 and EY 10096. We thank optic vesicle or perinatal retina, either by intracellular lineage Mrs. Lianhua Yang for her excellent technical assistance. dye injection (Holt et al., 1988; Wetts and Fraser, 1988; Wetts Correspondence should be addressed to Dr. Sally A. Moody, Department of et al., 1989) or by infection with a recombinant retrovirus (Price Anatomy and Neuroscience Program, The George Washington University Medical Center, 2300 I Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20037. et al., 1987; Turner and Cepko, 1987; Turner et al., 1990), Copyright 0 1993 Society for Neuroscience 0270-6474/93/133193-18$05.00/O elegantly demonstratesthat most of the clones derived from a 3194 Huang and Moody - Lineage Regulation in Frog Retina single neuroepithelial cell contain more than one retinal cell To test experimentally whether these progenitors are deter- type; mitotic retinal cells rarely produce a clone consisting of a mined regarding these retinal lineage patterns, we bilaterally single phenotype. Although this fact has often been cited as deleted the major progenitor of the retina and quantified the demonstrating that cell lineage plays no role in vertebrate CNS retinal contribution of the remaining blastomeres. To test whether phenotype determination, this observation addresses only one blastomeres that normally do not produce retina are competent way that lineage may be important, that is, to produce a clone to do so if placed in the appropriate position, single labeled cells of cells having the same phenotype. There are several examples were either deleted from or transplanted into the site of the that show that cell lineage directs phenotype choices in other major retinal progenitor. The results from both approaches sup- ways (reviewed in Kenyon, 1985; Stent, 1985; Davidson, 1990). port the hypothesis that the position of a blastomere prior to Lineage patterns may direct different progenitors to produce gastrulation determines whether it will be a progenitor of the prescribed subsets of cell types, as has been shown for nematode retina, in most cases regardless of the blastomere’s original lin- motoneurons (White et al., 1982). Lineage genes may direct eage. However, some vegetal blastomeres are not competent to progenitors to divide a prescribed number of times and thus make retina even when located in the most “retinogenic” po- control the number of cells in a population (Chalfie et al., 198 1; sition. Williams and Herrup; 1985). Finally, lineage patterns may place the descendants of a particular progenitor in prescribed domains Materials and Methods of a tissue, such that their phenotypes are determined by region- Embryo collection. Fertilized Xenopus laevis eggs were obtained by go- specific cell-cell interactions. This occurs in the nematode vulva nadotropin-induced mating ofadult frogs. After the jelly coat was chem- ically removed, two- and early four-cell stage embryos with the first (Stemberg and Horvitz, 1989), and has been suggested in nu- cleavage furrow bisecting the gray crescent (Klein, 1987) were collected merous regions of the vertebrate CNS (Jacobson, 1983, 1985; for later use. At 32 cells, only those embryos with stereotypic radial Herrup, 1986; Fraser et al., 1990; Leber et al., 1990). cleavages (type X, Jacobson 198 1a; Moody, 198713) were used for lineage In order to investigate whether these other kinds of lineage dye injection, blastomere deletion, and transplantation. By selecting this patterns have a significant role in vertebrate CNS pattern for- population for study we minimized any variations in furrow pattern and thus kept blastomere position consistent among animals (Moody, mation, it is necessary to study the variation in phenotype, cell 1987a,b, 1989; Moody and Kline, 1990; Huang and Moody, 1992). In number, and spatial distribution between clones derived from other words, we were able to inject, delete, and transplant progenitors the same progenitor in many different animals. Analysis of clone that were nearly invariant among animals. variation has been a most important means for establishing the Lineage dye injection. About 1 nl of 0.5% Texas red-dextran amine (Molecular Probes) or fluorescein-dextran amine (Molecular Probes) role cell lineage plays in nematode development. In fact, the was pressure injected into identified blastomeres. Previous fate maps critical evidence