Uranium Mining in South Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Acid Mine Drainage and Human Rights
Acid Mine Drainage and Human Rights The South African Human Rights commission acknowledges MARIETTE LIEFFERINK and EUGENE VILJOEN for providing the photographs that appear in this booklet. Mariette is the CEO of the Federation for a Sustainable Environment and was a member of the SAHRC Section 05 Committee on Human Rights and Acid Mine Drainage. Eugene is one of the Commission’s valuable stakeholders who has worked on mining issues in the West Rand, Mogale City, for several years. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. What is Acid Mine Drainage? ---------------------------------------------------------4 2. How does Acid Mine Drainage impact on human rights? ---------------------6 2.1 Who is affected by the development of mines? --------------------------7 Consultation -----------------------------------------------------------------------8 Human rights and Business ----------------------------------------------------9 3. How is Acid Mine Drainage treated? --------------------------------------------- 10 Active Treatment Technology ------------------------------------------------ 11 Passive Treatment Technology ---------------------------------------------- 12 Recovery of useful minerals from AMD ----------------------------------- 13 4. What are mines doing about Acid Mine Drainage? --------------------------- 13 Industry Responses ------------------------------------------------------------- 14 5. What is the South African Government doing about Acid Mine Drainage in Gauteng? -------------------------------------------------- 15 5.1 Delayed Government -
Country Profile – South Africa
Country profile – South Africa Version 2016 Recommended citation: FAO. 2016. AQUASTAT Country Profile – South Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, Italy The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licencerequest or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected]. -
Early History of South Africa
THE EARLY HISTORY OF SOUTH AFRICA EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES . .3 SOUTH AFRICA: THE EARLY INHABITANTS . .5 THE KHOISAN . .6 The San (Bushmen) . .6 The Khoikhoi (Hottentots) . .8 BLACK SETTLEMENT . .9 THE NGUNI . .9 The Xhosa . .10 The Zulu . .11 The Ndebele . .12 The Swazi . .13 THE SOTHO . .13 The Western Sotho . .14 The Southern Sotho . .14 The Northern Sotho (Bapedi) . .14 THE VENDA . .15 THE MASHANGANA-TSONGA . .15 THE MFECANE/DIFAQANE (Total war) Dingiswayo . .16 Shaka . .16 Dingane . .18 Mzilikazi . .19 Soshangane . .20 Mmantatise . .21 Sikonyela . .21 Moshweshwe . .22 Consequences of the Mfecane/Difaqane . .23 Page 1 EUROPEAN INTERESTS The Portuguese . .24 The British . .24 The Dutch . .25 The French . .25 THE SLAVES . .22 THE TREKBOERS (MIGRATING FARMERS) . .27 EUROPEAN OCCUPATIONS OF THE CAPE British Occupation (1795 - 1803) . .29 Batavian rule 1803 - 1806 . .29 Second British Occupation: 1806 . .31 British Governors . .32 Slagtersnek Rebellion . .32 The British Settlers 1820 . .32 THE GREAT TREK Causes of the Great Trek . .34 Different Trek groups . .35 Trichardt and Van Rensburg . .35 Andries Hendrik Potgieter . .35 Gerrit Maritz . .36 Piet Retief . .36 Piet Uys . .36 Voortrekkers in Zululand and Natal . .37 Voortrekker settlement in the Transvaal . .38 Voortrekker settlement in the Orange Free State . .39 THE DISCOVERY OF DIAMONDS AND GOLD . .41 Page 2 EVOLUTION OF AFRICAN SOCIETIES Humankind had its earliest origins in Africa The introduction of iron changed the African and the story of life in South Africa has continent irrevocably and was a large step proven to be a micro-study of life on the forwards in the development of the people. -
Acid Mine Drainage and Its Governance in the Gauteng City-Region 2015
R E P Acid Mine Drainage A P L A N and its Governance O I S A C in the Gauteng City-Region C 10O Researched and written for the GCRO by Kerry Bobbins May 2015 ISBN Number: 978-0-620-65778-5 R E P Acid Mine Drainage A P L A N and its Governance O I S A C in the Gauteng City-Region C O Researched and written for the GCRO by Kerry Bobbins May 2015 List of Acronyms AECOM AECOMSM AMD Acid Mine Drainage BKS BKS Group (Pty) Ltd CB Central Basin CBD Central Business District CBEC Central Basin Environmental Corporation CGS Council for Geo-science CME Compliance and Monitoring Enforcement CRG Central Rand Gold CSIR Council for Scientific and Industrial Research DBSA Development Bank of South Africa DEA Department of Environmental Affairs DMR Department of Mineral Resources DNT Department of National Treasury DWA Department of Water Affairs DWAF Department of Water Affairs and Forestry DWE Digby Wells Environmental DWS Department of Water and Sanitation EB Eastern Basin EBEC Eastern Basin Environmental Corporation ECL Environmental Critical Level EIA Environmental Impact Assessment ERPM/ERM East Rand Proprietary Mines FSE Federation for a Sustainable Environment GCIS Government Communication and Information System GCR Gauteng City-Region GCRO Gauteng City-Region Observatory GDACE Gauteng Department of Agriculture, Environment and Conservation GDARD Gauteng Department of Agriculture and Rural Development HDS High Density Sludge I&AP Interested and affected party IDC Industrial Development Corporation IMC Inter-Ministerial Committee LHWP Lesotho -
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Blyvoor Gold Mining Project, West Rand, Gauteng
Environmental Impact Assessment for the Blyvoor Gold Mining Project, West Rand, Gauteng Biodiversity Report Project Number: BVG4880 Prepared for: Blyvoor Gold Capital (Pty) Ltd October 2018 _______________________________________________________________________________________ Digby Wells and Associates (South Africa) (Pty) Ltd Co. Reg. No. 2010/008577/07. Turnberry Office Park, 48 Grosvenor Road, Bryanston, 2191. Private Bag X10046, Randburg, 2125, South Africa Tel: +27 11 789 9495, Fax: +27 11 069 6801, [email protected], www.digbywells.com _______________________________________________________________________________________ Directors: GE Trusler (C.E.O), GB Beringer, LF Koeslag, J Leaver (Chairman)*, NA Mehlomakulu*, DJ Otto, RA Williams* *Non-Executive _______________________________________________________________________________________ This document has been prepared by Digby Wells Environmental. Report Type: Biodiversity Report Environmental Impact Assessment for the Blyvoor Gold Project Name: Mining Project, West Rand, Gauteng Project Code: BVG4880 Name Responsibility Signature Date Aquatics and Kieren Bremner wetlands surveying October 2018 and report writing Kathryn Roy Report writing October 2018 Fauna and flora Rudi Greffrath October 2018 baseline Brett Coutts OpsCo review October 2018 This report is provided solely for the purposes set out in it and may not, in whole or in part, be used for any other purpose without Digby Wells Environmental prior written consent. Digby Wells Environmental i Biodiversity Report Environmental Impact Assessment for the Blyvoor Gold Mining Project, West Rand, Gauteng BVG4880 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Digby Wells Environmental (hereinafter Digby Wells) was appointed by Blyvoor Gold Capital (Pty) Ltd (hereafter Blyvoor Gold) to undertake a freshwater impact assessment and fauna and flora baseline update as part of an Environmental Application Process to obtain the required authorisation for the Blyvoor Gold mining operation. -
Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment
Study Name: Orange River Integrated Water Resources Management Plan Report Title: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Submitted By: WRP Consulting Engineers, Jeffares and Green, Sechaba Consulting, WCE Pty Ltd, Water Surveys Botswana (Pty) Ltd Authors: A Jeleni, H Mare Date of Issue: November 2007 Distribution: Botswana: DWA: 2 copies (Katai, Setloboko) Lesotho: Commissioner of Water: 2 copies (Ramosoeu, Nthathakane) Namibia: MAWRD: 2 copies (Amakali) South Africa: DWAF: 2 copies (Pyke, van Niekerk) GTZ: 2 copies (Vogel, Mpho) Reports: Review of Existing Infrastructure in the Orange River Catchment Review of Surface Hydrology in the Orange River Catchment Flood Management Evaluation of the Orange River Review of Groundwater Resources in the Orange River Catchment Environmental Considerations Pertaining to the Orange River Summary of Water Requirements from the Orange River Water Quality in the Orange River Demographic and Economic Activity in the four Orange Basin States Current Analytical Methods and Technical Capacity of the four Orange Basin States Institutional Structures in the four Orange Basin States Legislation and Legal Issues Surrounding the Orange River Catchment Summary Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 6 1.1 General ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Objective of the study ................................................................................................ -
Merafong City Local Municipality Local Integrated Transport Plan (LITP)
Merafong City Local Municipality Local Integrated Transport Plan (LITP) October 2018 SUMMARY SHEET Report Type Transportation Planning Title Report Framework: Merafong City Local Municipality – Local Integrated Transport Plan Location Merafong City Local Municipality Client West Rand District Municipality Reference Number ITS 3893 Project Team Dr Pieter Pretorius Florence Asiimwe Henri Vorster Charmaine Dladla Cobus Lotz Contact Details Tel: 012 349 1664 Date October 2018 Report Status Second Draft INNOVATIVE TRANSPORT SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 3 1.1. Background ................................................................................................................................. 3 1.2. Legislation requirements ............................................................................................................ 3 1.3. Format of the LITP ...................................................................................................................... 4 2. TRANSPORT STATUS QUO .......................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Commuter Rail Facilities ............................................................................................................. 5 1.1. Mini-Bus Taxi Facilities .............................................................................................................. -
Wetland Plant Communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa
Bothalia 28,2: 213-229 (1998) Wetland plant communities in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area, North-West, South Africa S.S. CILLIERS*, L.L. SCHOEMAN* and G.J. BREDENKAMP** Keywords: Braun-Blanquet, DECORANA. disturbed areas, MEGATAB, TURBOVEG. TWINSPAN, urban open spaces ABSTRACT Wetlands in natural areas in South Africa have been described before, but no literature exists concerning the phyto sociology of urban wetlands. The objective of this study was to conduct a complete vegetation analysis of the wetlands in the Potchefstroom Municipal Area. Using a numerical classification technique (TWINSPAN) as a first approximation, the classification was refined by using Braun-Blanquet procedures. The result is a phytosociological table from which a number of unique plant communities are recognised. These urban wetlands are characterised by a high species diversity, which is unusual for wetlands. Reasons for the high species diversity could be the different types of disturbances occurring in this area. Results of this study can be used to construct more sensible management practises for these wetlands. CONTENTS Many natural wetlands have been destroyed in the course of agricultural, industrial and urban development Introduction..............................................................213 (Archibald & Batchelor 1992), and are regarded as one Study area................................................................ 215 of South Africa’s most endangered ecosystem types Materials and methods..............................................215 (Walmsley -
ABSTRACT As Early As 1987, the US Environmental Protection
Registration Number: 2006/217972/23 NPO NUMBER: 062986-NPO ABSTRACT As early as 1987, the US Environmental Protection Agency recognised that “.....problems related to mining waste may be rated as second only to global warming and stratospheric ozone depletion in terms of ecological risk. The release to the environment of mining waste can result in profound, generally irreversible destruction of ecosystems1.” Gold tailings dams from the Witwatersrand Basin usually contain elevated amounts of heavy metals and radionuclides. With slimes dams in the goldfields of the Witwatersrand Basin 2 covering an area of about 400 km and containing some 430 000 tons of U3O8, and 6 billion tons of iron pyrite tailings, they constitute an environmental problem of extraordinary spatial dimensions. Due to inadequate design, poor management and neglect, these tailings dams have 1 CSIR. Briefing Note August 2009. Acid Mine Drainage in South Africa. Dr. Pat Manders. Director, Natural Resources and the Environment. European Environmental Bureau (EEB). 2000. The environmental performance of the mining industry and the action necessary to strengthen European legislation in the wake of the Tisza-Danube pollution. EEB Document no 2000/016. 32 p 1 been subject to varying degrees of water and wind erosion. Effects range from water pollution, the result of acid mine drainage, and air pollution in the form of airborne dust from unrehabilitated or partially rehabilitated and reprocessed tailings dams. As a result of acid mine drainage (AMD), from point discharges and seepage uranium is released into the groundwater and fluvial systems. (Figure 1) Figure 1 2 West Wits Pit Figure 2 Recent public domain official and scientific studies indicate that there is active leaching of uranium from the tailings, transport of soluble uranium species through water systems, with subsequent deposition of insoluble uranium species in sediments of fluvial systems. -
Fosaf Proceedings of the 13Th Yellowfish Working
1 FOSAF THE FEDERATION OF SOUTHERN AFRICAN FLYFISHERS PROCEEDINGS OF THE 13TH YELLOWFISH WORKING GROUP CONFERENCE STERKFONTEIN DAM, HARRISMITH 06 – 08 MARCH 2009 Edited by Peter Arderne PRINTING SPONSORED BY: 13th Yellowfish Working Group Conference 2 CONTENTS Page Participants 3 Chairman’s Opening Address – Peter Mills 4 Water volumes of SA dams: A global perspective – Louis De Wet 6 The Strontium Isotope distribution in Water & Fish – Wikus Jordaan 13 Overview of the Mine Drainage Impacts in the West Rand Goldfield – Mariette 16 Liefferink Adopt-a-River Programme: Development of an implementation plan – Ramogale 25 Sekwele Report on the Genetic Study of small scaled yellowfishes – Paulette Bloomer 26 The Biology of Smallmouth & Largemouth yellowfish in Lake Gariep – Bruce Ellender 29 & Olaf Weyl Likely response of Smallmouth yellowfish populations to fisheries development – Olaf 33 Weyl Early Development of Vaal River Smallmouth Yellowfish - Daksha Naran 36 Body shape changes & accompanying habitat shifts: observations in life cycle of 48 Labeobarbus marequensis in the Luvuvhu River – Paul Fouche Alien Fish Eradication in the Cape rivers: Progress with the EIA – Dean Impson 65 Yellowfish Telemetry: Update on the existing study – Gordon O’Brien 67 Bushveld Smallscale yellowfish (Labeobarbus polylepis): Aspects of the Ecology & 68 Population Mananagement– Gordon O’Brien Protected River Ecosystems Study: Bloubankspruit, Skeerpoort & Magalies River & 71 Elands River (Mpumalanga) – Hylton Lewis & Gordon O’Brien Legislative review: Critical -
British Scorched Earth and Concentration Camp Policies
72 THE BRITISH SCORCHED EARTH AND CONCENTRATION CAMP POLICIES IN THE 1 POTCHEFSTROOM REGION, 1899–1902 Prof GN van den Bergh Research Associate, North-West University Abstract The continued military resistance of the Republics after the occupation of Bloemfontein and Pretoria and exaggerated by the advent of guerrilla tactics frustrated the British High Command. In the case of the Potchefstroom region, British aggravation came to focus on the successful resurgence of the Potchefstroom Commando, under Gen. Petrus Liebenberg, swelled by surrendered burghers from the Gatsrand again taking up arms. A succession of proclamations of increasing severity were directed at civilians for lending support to commandos had no effect on either the growth or success of Liebenberg’s commando. His basis for operations was the Gatsrand from where he disrupted British supply communications. He was involved in British evacuations of the town in July and August 1900 and in assisting De Wet in escaping British pursuit in August 1900. British policy came to revolve around denying Liebenberg use of the abundant food supplies in the Gatsrand by applying a scorched earth policy there and in the adjacent Mooi River basin. This occurred in conjuncture with the brief second and permanent third occupation of Potchefstroom. The subsequent establishment of garrisons there gave rise to the systematic destruction of the Gatsrand agricultural infrastructure. To deny further use of the region by commandos it was depopulated. In consequence, the first and largest concentration camp in the Transvaal was established in Potchefstroom. The policies succeeded in dispelling Liebenberg from the region. Introduction Two of the most controversial aspects of the Anglo Boer War are the closely related British scorched earth and concentration camp policies. -
Appendix E 1: I&Ap Database
Scoping Report for the Proposed West Wits Mining Project August 2018 APPENDIX E 1: I&AP DATABASE E WEST WITS MLI (PTY) LTD WEST WITS MLI RIGHT APPLICAITON INTERESTED AND AFFECTED PARTY DATABASE TABLE 1: WARD COUNCILLORS, MUNICIPAL STRUCTURES, RESIDENTS AND RELATED FORUMS OR ASSOCIATIONS ........................................................................... 2 TABLE 2: MEETING ATTENDANCE REGISTERS................................................................................................................................................................................ 13 TABLE 3: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL BUSINESSES, PARASTATALS, COMMUNITY STRUCTURES, NON-GOVERNMENT ORGANISATIONS ASSOCIATIONS .............. 84 TABLE 4: REGULATORY AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 91 1 TABLE 1: WARD COUNCILLORS, MUNICIPAL STRUCTURES, RESIDENTS AND RELATED FORUMS OR ASSOCIATIONS Name and Surname Interest in Project Postal Address Contact numbers E-mail Elivis Matji Business 0792536704 [email protected]; AC Swart Hamberg Resident and 2 Bree Street 0832503492 [email protected]; Representative in Communities Hamberg Against Mining Roodepoort 1724 Alton Snyders Davidsonville Resident 0748743658 [email protected]; Fabian Minaar Resident 0781024421 Elizabeth Stapelberg Resident 29 Geoffrey Street 0820716437 [email protected]; Creswell Park [email protected]; Roodepoort