LANDSAT Data: a New Perspective for Geology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

LANDSAT Data: a New Perspective for Geology RALPH N. BAKER General Electric Company-Space Division Beltsville, MD 20705 LANDSAT Data: A New Perspective for Geology A review of the utilization of LANDSAT imagery for geological interpretation. HE LANDSAT (formerly ERTS) satellite geologic mapping, mineral and petroleum T program has been in existence for just exploration, and natural hazards surveys. The over two years, and in this brief time has categories are arbitrary, and results of inves­ added a whole new dimension to the study of tigations might fit equally well into more our Earth. Scientists from all over the world than one of these. have used data measured by LANDSAT's sensors (telemetered down from a REGIONAL STRUCTURAL STUDIES 580-mile-high vantage point in space) to Several investigators studied regional monitor pollution and crop growth, explore structures and their relationships in LAND­ for minerals and petroleum, and conduct a SAT imagery, availing themselves of a per­ host of other investigations ranging from spective previously impossible to achieve. ABSTRACT: The LANDSAT (formerly ERTS) program, while con­ ceived and implemented as a research and development project, has been used as an operational orbital remote sensing system providing data of considerable value to various branches of geology. Areas in which the satellite imagery has been found most useful include re­ gional interpretations ofgeologic structure,lupdating and verifying of geologic maps, mineral and petroleum exploration, and the monitor­ ing of natural hazards such as large-scale erosion and seismicity. Investigations in these areas of application demonstrate the wide variety of uses presently undertaken or envisioned for the future. Many benefits have already been felt; others will be seen in the near future where the promise ofmineral or petroleum concentration will be realized through conventional ground based and satellite explora­ tion techniques. LANDSAT will aid considerably in pinpointing the likely site; "hands on" geology will do the rest. animal migration patterns to iceberg monitor­ Y. Isachsen of New York State's Geological ing. The mission, originally designed for re­ Survey used the IOO-by-IOO-mile images to search and development, has for all practical construct a mosaic of the State and neigh­ purposes been considered "operational" boring regions. This mosaic shows, at a from the user's point of view. glance, geologic relationships of New York To geologists, the regional overview and State's diverse terrain, major rock units, gla­ repetitive coverage of LANDSAT data has cial features, large scale lineaments, and cir­ been particularly useful, enabling them to cular structures (Figure I). Isachsen went take advantage of vegetation and sun angle into the field to verify the existence of many changes in theirattempts to unravel the phys­ of these features discovered in the LAND­ ical history and setting ofthe Earth. Success­ SAT mosaic, and demonstrated how one ful LANDSAT investigations in geology can could use satellite imagery to discern fea­ be grouped for convenience into four general tures unsuspected at a larger scale. categories: regional structural studies, Houston and Marrs, LANDSAT inves- PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING AND REMOTE SENSING, 1233 Vol. 41, No. 10, October 1975, pp. 1233-1239. 1234 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC E GINEERING & REMOTE SENSING, 1975 FIG. 1. LANDSAT mosaic and lineament map of eastern New York State (after Isachsen, 1973). tigators from the University of Wyoming, between surface and sensor, investigators studied geologic structures in Wyoming by have shown that much geological informa­ using a LANDSAT mosaic, and reported that tion can be derived from imagery where the their interpretations compared favorably ground is obscured by vegetation. with known ground truth ofthe region. While this region had been reasonably well mapped GEOLOGIC MAPPI G by conventional field surveys, the The LANDSAT overview and coverage Houston-Marrs study points out the possibil­ cycle makes map correction and verification a ity of interpreting poorly mapped regions natural application to geology. Investigators with a minimum of ground truth, time, and H. Blodget and A. Anderson of NASA's God­ cost with some measure of confidence. dard Space Flight Center constructed a In the East where climate is generally less three-image mosaic of southern Morocco arid than in some Western States, LANDSAT from which they were able to verify and mod­ investigators have still been able to collect ify previously mapped lithologic boundaries, valuable geologic information despite the and investigate relationships between struc­ heavier vegetation cover. For example, re­ tural character and mineral emplacement gional lineaments were discovered and map­ from a regional perspective. A common pro­ ped by Gold and co-investigators at Penn cedure among LANDSAT investigators has State, using LANDSAT imagery of the been to use the imagery as base maps upon thickly forested Pennsylvania Appalachians. which geologic interpretations of structure, A private consulting firm has applied lithology, and lineament patterns are computer-aided enhancementtechniques (in superimposed. Another team of inves­ this case General Electric Company's tigators, M. Abdel-Gawad and J. Silverstein IMAGE 100 multispectral image processing of Rockwell International, discovered that and display system) to imagery ofother areas LANDSAT images of Baja and the Gulf of in eastern Pennsylvania, with success in dis­ California showed several small islands to tinguishing rock outcrops oflimited areal ex­ have been misplaced on conventional maps, tent. Thus, while imagery ofarid regions has both in geographic location and in topo­ the obvious advantage of little interference graphic detail. LANDSAT DATA: A NEW PERSPECTIVE FOR GEOLOGY 1235 M. Viljoen ofSouth Africa used LANDSAT from LANDSAT has been accomplished imagery to unravel the geologic relationships using the following well-known geologic ofthe South African shield. This investigator principles: was able to distinguish between the granite­ • Mineralizing fluids from within the Earth gneiss craton, adjacent metomorphic mobile may follow the paths of least resistance to belts, and major "greenstone" intrusions. the surface; these paths are zones of weak­ The nature of these intrusions and their ness through the Earth's crust and occur characteristic relationship to the overall where the solid rock has been fractured and geologic setting was recognized by Viljoen to faulted. Thus, a concentration of "linea­ be similar to that found in metallic mineral ments", many ofwhich can be discerned in LANDSAT imagery, may well indicate mining districts in Canada (e.g., Sudbury, where the crust is weakest and, therefore, Ontario) and Western Australia, and suggests most likely to be mineralized. that the South African regions might contain • Some rock types discernible from orbital useful concentrations of minerals as well. In altitudes are characteristically associated this example, the roughly 34,OOO-square­ with certain types of minerals because they kilometer region surveyed in a single indicate similar formative conditions or alt­ LANDSAT frame could be broken down into eration through time. mineralization potential maps with consid­ • Mineralization may alter surface tones by secondary enrichment, vegetation stress erable savings in time and cost to mineral andJor chemical changes in the vicinity of exploration interests. On a larger scale, the ore body, all of which can indicate that perhaps the most impressive display of significant mineral concentration has taken LANDSAT's map~making capability can be place. seen in the mosaic of the 48 conterminous Using these and other, more subtle clues, United States, produced by the Soil Conser­ geologists using LANDSAT imagery have vation Service ofthe U. S. Department ofAg­ reported varying degrees of success in min­ riculture, and available to the public (Figure erai and petroleum exploration studies. Some 2). of these investigators have related LANDSAT-discovered Iineaments to known MINERAL AND PETROLEUM EXPLORATION mineral concentrations; many of these The majority of LANDSAT geology inves­ studies have been undertaken in the arid re­ tigations fall into this category primarily be­ gions ofWestern North America. E. Lathram cause ofthe direct impact on current and pro­ and other geologists of the U. S. Geological jected national needs. Mineral exploration Survey discovered a series ofintersecting re- FIG. 2. Mosaic of continental United States compiled from LANDSAT imagery by USDA. 1236 PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING, 1975 gional lineaments in a rare cloud-free NIM­ and of little value as ore guides. With the BUS image ofAlaska. These lineaments were relationship demonstrated by these inves­ verified in LANDSAT imagery and enabled tigators, future exploration efforts should be the investigators to propose a radically dif­ simplified markedly (Figure 4). Another ferent picture of mineral emplacement in Californian, 1. Bechtold, demonstrated a Alaska. Earlier speculation suggested that similar correlation between tensional fis­ mineral deposits in Alaska were related to sures in the Lake Mead area (resulting from fold belts of the Canadian Cordillera. Based east-west crustal extension) and concentra­ on the occurrence of the newly discovered tions of gold, silver and other metallic ore regional fractures, Lathram and his cowork­ deposits. ers suggested that mineral emplacement An interesting multilevel geochemical ex­ might
Recommended publications
  • 5.4.5 Geological Hazards
    Section 5.4.5: Risk Assessment – Geological Hazards 5.4.5 Geological Hazards The following section provides the hazard profile (hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences and losses, probability of future occurrences, and impact of climate change) and vulnerability assessment for the geological hazards in Sussex County. 2016 Plan Update Changes The hazard profile has been significantly enhanced to include a detailed hazard description, location, extent, previous occurrences, probability of future occurrence, and potential change in climate and its impacts on the geological hazards is discussed. The geological hazards is now located in Section 5 of the plan update. It includes landslide, land subsidence and sinkholes, all of which were profiled separately in the 2011 HMP. New and updated figures from federal and state agencies are incorporated. U.S. 2010 Census data was incorporated, where appropriate. Previous occurrences were updated with events that occurred between 2008 and 2015. A vulnerability assessment was conducted for the geological hazards and it now directly follows the hazard profile. 5.4.5.1 Profile Hazard Description Geological hazards are any geological or hydrological processes that pose a threat to humans and natural properties. Every year, severe natural events destroy infrastructure and cause injuries and deaths. Geologic hazards may include volcanic eruptions and other geothermal related features, earthquakes, landslides and other slope failures, mudflows, sinkhole collapses, snow avalanches, flooding, glacial surges and outburst floods, tsunamis, and shoreline movements. For the purpose of this HMP update, only landslides and land subsidence/sinkholes will be discussed in the Geological Hazard profile. Landslides According to the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Other Hazards (Se)
    Goleta General Plan /Coastal Land Use Plan 5.0 Safety Element CHAPTER 5.0 SAFETY ELEMENT: COASTAL AND OTHER HAZARDS (SE) 5.1 INTRODUCTION General Plan Law Requirements [GP] The Safety Element is one of seven general Safety Element Policies plan elements mandated by state law. The SE 1: Safety in General scope of the Safety Element is specified in SE 2: Bluff Erosion and Retreat Section 65302 (g) of the California SE 3: Beach Erosion and Shoreline Hazards SE 4: Seismic and Seismically Induced Hazards Government Code as follows: SE 5: Soil and Slope Stability Hazards SE 6: Flood Hazards The general plan shall include a safety SE 7: Urban and Wildland Fire Hazards element for the protection of the SE 8: Oil and Gas Industry Hazards community from any unreasonable SE 9: Airport-Related Hazards. SE 10: Hazardous Materials and Facilities risks associated with the effects of SE 11: Emergency Preparedness seismically induced surface rupture, ground shaking, ground failure, tsunami, seiche, and dam failure; slope instability leading to mudslides and landslides; subsidence and other geologic hazards known to the legislative body; flooding; and wild land and urban fires. The safety element shall include mapping of known seismic and other geologic hazards. It shall also address evacuation routes, peak-load water supply requirements, and minimum road widths and clearances around structures, as those items relate to identified fire and geologic hazards. Coastal hazards such as bluff retreat and shoreline erosion are also addressed in this element, as are hazards associated with oil and gas production, processing, and transport. California Coastal Act Requirements [CP] The California Coastal Act (Coastal Act) requires new development to be sited and designed to minimize risks, ensure stability and structural integrity, and neither create nor contribute significantly to erosion or require the construction of new shoreline protective devices that would substantially alter natural landforms along coastal bluffs and cliffs.
    [Show full text]
  • BAER) Assessment Specialist Report, Phase 2 – GEOLOGIC HAZARDS
    Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) Assessment Specialist Report, Phase 2 – GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Thomas Fire, Los Padres National Forest January 2018 Allen King – Geologist, Los Padres NF (retired) Dennis Veich – Forest Geologist, Shasta-Trinity NF Fire-damaged Tree near Chismahoo Mountain “When rain starts to fall, people in higher risk basins should be prepared to evacuate. Do not remain in, near or below burned areas at the base of canyons, even during light rain. Stay away from small streams that could become raging rivers in the blink of an eye. If the forecast calls for heavy rains through the night, homes may not be safe places if they are located in or near drainage areas and within a mile of the mountain front. Roads can suddenly become blocked with mud and debris, and can wash out at stream crossings. It is important to pay strong attention to warnings from local emergency responders and weather advisories.” -Sue Cannon, USGS Landslide Hazards Program, 2003 INTRODUCTION The Thomas Fire started on December 4, 2017, near the Thomas Aquinas College (east end of Sulphur Mountain), Ventura County, California. The fire is still considered to be active and as of January 12th, 2018, it is estimated to have burned 281,900 acres and is 92% contained. Approximately 181,300 acres within the burn area are National Forest lands (~64%); 98,200 acres are private (~35%); and 2,400 acres (~1%) are a combination of state and county properties. Although tremendous down-slope/down-drainage resources and values and lives are recognized and kept in mind during our analysis, this report addresses the effects of the Thomas Fire and the associated Values At Risk (VARs) ONLY on Forest Service lands, since the other lands are being evaluated by teams of Cal Fire scientists and other agencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Design Guidelines Appendix B: Geotechnical
    Mandatory Retrofit Program for Non-Ductile Concrete Buildings And Pre-Northridge Steel Moment Frame Buildings Ordinance 17-1011 SEISMIC DESIGN GUIDELINES APPENDIX B ISSUED NOVEMBER 8, 2019 REVISED SEPTEMBER 25, 2020 APPENDIX B: GEOTECHNICAL / GEOLOGICAL REPORT REQUIREMENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ASCE 41 geotechnical/geological report requirements for seismic evaluation and retrofit design varies greatly based on the amount of as-built information obtained and type of existing foundation system. The following document is intended to help clarify geotechnical / geological requirements of Ordinance 17-1011 for Non-Ductile Concrete and Pre-Northridge Steel Moment Frames. It is noted that all geotechnical / geological reports shall be signed and stamped by a California licensed Geotechnical Engineer and by a California licensed Geologist (if applicable). 2.0 SEISMIC SITE HAZARD The following frequently asked questions and answers are intended to clarify the scope and requirements of the seismic site hazard requirements of Ordinance 17-1011. 2.1 When is a site-specific seismic hazard determination required? A site-specific seismic hazard procedure is required when: a. The building is located on Site Class E soils and the mapped BSE-2N Sxs>2.0 or b. The building is located on Site Class F soils, unless Ss<0.20. In addition, a site-specific hazard is required to scale records when performing a non- linear dynamic time-history analysis. [Ref. ASCE 41 Section 2.4]. 2.2 When scaling a suite of acceleration records, is there a required or preferred scaling method? A site-specific response spectra shall be developed per ASCE 41 Section 2.4.2.1 requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification and Mitigation of Geologic Hazards
    AIPGprofessional geologists in all specialties of the science Identification and Mitigation of Geologic Hazards An important and practical application of and because earthquakes geology is identifying hazardous natural are of such a scale that phenomena and isolating their causes in they can affect several order to safeguard communities. According communities si-multane- to the USGS, the average economic toll ously, the risk to human life from natural hazards in the United States is is obvious.2 The largest approximately $52 billion per year, while recorded earthquake to hit the average annual death toll is approxi- the North American conti- mately 200.1 The primary causes are nent had a magnitude of earthquakes, landslides, and flooding, but 9.2, which occurred on other events, such as subsidence, volcanic March 27, 1964 in eruptions, and exposure to radon or asbes- Anchorage, Alaska. It dev- tos, also pose considerable danger. astated the town and sur- Awareness of the potential hazards that rounding area, and could persist in areas under consideration for be felt over an area of half Figure 2. Volcano Zones both private and community development a million square miles.2 is critical, and so geological consultants Land-slides caused most of the average global temperature by 2 and engineers are called in to survey land the damage, while a 30-foot high tsunami degrees Fahrenheit for 2 years.3 development sites and assist building con- generated by an underwater quake leveled tractors in designing structures that will coastal villages around the Gulf of Alaska, The role of geologists in mitigating such stand the test of time.
    [Show full text]
  • Type of Services Current Conditions Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazards Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update
    Type of Services Current Conditions Soils, Geology, and Geologic Hazards Envision San José 2040 General Plan Update Client David J. Powers & Associates Client Address 1885 The Alameda, Suite 204 San José, CA 95126 Project Number 118-13-2 Date March 20, 2009 Prepared Scott E. Fitinghoff, P.E., G.E. by Principal Geotechnical Engineer Philip A. Frame, C.E.G. Senior Engineering Geologist Laura C. Knutson, P.E., G.E. Principal Geotechnical Engineer Quality Assurance Reviewer Table of Contents SECTION 1: INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................... 1 1.1 PURPOSE ......................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 2: SOILS AND GEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ..................................................... 1 2.1 GEOLOGIC OVERVIEW OF SAN JOSÉ ......................................................... 1 2.2 LANDSLIDES ................................................................................................... 2 2.3 WEAK/EXPANSIVE SOILS .............................................................................. 3 2.4 NATURALLY-OCCURRING ABESTOS (NOA) ............................................... 4 2.5 EROSION .......................................................................................................... 4 2.6 ARTIFICIAL FILL .............................................................................................. 4 2.7 GROUND SUBSIDENCE DUE TO GROUND WATER REMOVAL ................. 4 2.8 MINERAL RESOURCES
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Hazards
    Geologic Hazards CVEN 3698 Engineering Geology Definitions • A geologic hazard is one of several types of adverse geologic conditions capable of causing damage or loss of property and life (Wikipedia) • A geologic hazard shall mean a geologic condition or geologic process which poses a significant threat to health, life, limb, or property. (BC Land Use Department) • A geologic constraint shall mean a geologic condition which does not pose a significant threat to life or limb, but which can cause intolerable damage to structures (BC Land Use Department) • A geologic hazard is a natural geologic event that can endanger human lives and threaten human property. Earthquakes, geomagnetic storms, landslides, sinkholes, tsunamis, and volcanoes are all types of geologic hazards. The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) provides real-time hazard information on earthquakes, landslides, geo-magnetics, and volcanoes, as well as background information on all the types of hazards. http://geohazards.cr.usgs.gov Counties and Municipalities in Colorado regulate geologic Hazards in four different ways • Master and Land Use Plans for land use patterns and development • Zoning Regulations • 1041 Regulations where hazardous areas are identified • Land Use or Subdivision Codes https://www.bouldercounty.org/departments/land-use/ http://coloradogeologicalsurvey.org/ https://assets.bouldercounty.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/cesare- geologic-hazard-study-boulder-county-20170331.pdf Front Range Geologic Hazards Field Trip: http://coloradogeologicalsurvey.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/6.pdf Two Types • Hazards associated with particular earth materials. Examples include swelling soils and rocks, toxic minerals (asbestos, acid drainage) and toxic gases (radon gas). • Hazards associated with earth processes (earthquakes, volcanoes, landslides, avalanches, rock slides and rock falls, soil creep, subsidence, floods, frost heave, coastal hazards).
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Hazards
    3 | GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 3.1 | OVERVIEW Primary hazards Most, though not all, of the geologic hazards that present the threat of devastation to life and property are the direct or indirect result of ground movement due to earthquakes (see below). The primary, or direct, earthquake hazards are surface-fault rupture and ground shaking. Secondary hazards, associated with ground shaking, include several forms of ground failure and inundation. (Inundation hazards, which may or may not be associated with earthquakes, are discussed in Chapter 6, “Flooding Hazards.”) Ground failure is the permanent deformation of the ground due to its loss of strength or failure of the underlying materials during earthquake shaking, and includes liquefaction, landslides, mudslides, differential settlement and subsidence. The likelihood of occurrence of these secondary earthquake effects (with the exception of inundation) is generally high. The main geologic hazards include: ● Fault rupture or displacement: a sudden shifting of the ground along the trace of an earthquake fault; usually, but not always, occurs at the time of an earthquake, and is associated with stronger quakes. PROTECT OAKLAND ● Ground shaking: movement of the ground caused by the passage of seismic waves through the earth’s outer crust during an earthquake; it typically is strongest near the earthquake fault. Ground shaking is the most noticeable phenomenon of seismic activity and the one people associate most closely with earthquakes; it also represents the major hazard from an earthquake, in the form of damage to structures. The intensity of ground shaking at a particular site is affected by the characteristics of the earthquake, distance from the fault, and the characteristics of the underlying soil.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast-Moving Debris Flows What Can You Do If You Live Near Steep Hills?
    Landslide hazards occur in many places around What Can You Do If You Live Near Steep Hills? the world and include fast-moving debris flows, slow-moving landslides, and a variety of flows Prior to Intense Storms: During Intense Storms: and slides initiating from volcanoes. Each year, these hazards cost billions of dollars and cause numerous fatalities and injuries. Awareness and 1. Become familiar with the land around you. 1. Stay alert and stay awake! Many debris-flow education about these hazards is a first step Learn whether debris flows have occurred in fatalities occur when people are sleeping. Listen toward reducing damaging effects. The U.S. your area by contacting local officials, State geo- to a radio for warnings of intense rainfall. Be Geological Survey conducts research and distrib- logical surveys, or departments of natural aware that intense short bursts of rain may be utes information about geologic hazards. resources, and university departments of geology. particularly dangerous, especially after longer Slopes where debris flows have occurred in the periods of heavy rainfall and damp weather. This Fact Sheet is published in English and past are likely to experience them in the future. Spanish and can be reproduced in any form for 2. If you are in areas susceptible to landslides and further distribution. It can also be downloaded 2. Support your local government in efforts to from our Internet website: debris flows, consider leaving if it is safe to do http://greenwood.cr.usgs.gov/pub/ develop and enforce land-use and building ordi- so. Remember that driving during an intense fact-sheets/fs-071-00 nances that regulate construction in areas suscep- storm is hazardous.
    [Show full text]
  • UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a Division of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES 2020
    GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATING GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND PREPARING ENGINEERING-GEOLOGY REPORTS, WITH A SUGGESTED APPROACH TO GEOLOGIC-HAZARD ORDINANCES IN UTAH SECOND EDITION Steve D. Bowman and William R. Lund, editors CIRCULAR 128 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2020 GUIDELINES FOR INVESTIGATING GEOLOGIC HAZARDS AND PREPARING ENGINEERING-GEOLOGY REPORTS, WITH A SUGGESTED APPROACH TO GEOLOGIC-HAZARD ORDINANCES IN UTAH SECOND EDITION Steve D. Bowman and William R. Lund, editors Cover photo: August 2014 Parkway Drive landslide, North Salt Lake. The landslide damaged the Eagle Ridge Tennis and Swim Club (white tent structure), severely damaged a house (directly above the tent structure), and removed part of the backyard of a second home. This landslide illustrates the significant impact geologic hazards can have on individuals, property owners, local governments, and the community. Photo credit: Gregg Beukelman, August 14, 2014. Suggested citation: Bowman, S.D., and Lund, W.R., editors, 2020, Guidelines for investigating geologic hazards and preparing engineering-geology reports, with a suggested approach to geologic-hazard ordinances in Utah, second edition: Utah Geological Survey Circular 128, 170 p., 5 appendices, https://doi.org/10.34191/C-128. CIRCULAR 128 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 2020 STATE OF UTAH Gary R. Herbert, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Brian Steed, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY R. William Keach II, Director PUBLICATIONS contact Natural Resources Map & Bookstore 1594 W. North Temple Salt Lake City, UT 84116 telephone: 801-537-3320 toll-free: 1-888-UTAH MAP website: utahmapstore.com email: [email protected] UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY contact 1594 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Hazard Identification
    HAZARD IDENTIFICATION A L A M O A R E A C O U N C I L O F G OVERNMENTS R E G I O N A L M I T I G A T I O N A C T I O N P L A N U PDATE 6.5.10 Geologic Hazards: Earthquakes and Sinkholes 6.5.10.1 Hazard Identifications Descriptions of the Earthquake and Sinkhole Hazards Earthquakes An earthquake is the motion or trembling of the ground produced by sudden displacement of rock in the Earth's crust. Earthquakes result from crustal strain, volcanism, landslides, or the collapse of caverns. Earthquakes can affect hundreds of thousands of square miles; cause damage to property measured in the tens of billions of dollars; result in loss of life and injury to hundreds of thousands of persons; and disrupt the social and economic functioning of the affected area. Most earthquakes are caused by the release of stresses accumulated as a result of the rupture of rocks along opposing fault planes in the Earth’s outer crust. These fault planes are typically found along borders of the Earth's ten tectonic plates. These plate borders generally follow the outlines of the continents, with the North American plate following the continental border with the Pacific Ocean in the west, but following the mid-Atlantic trench in the east. As earthquakes occurring in the mid-Atlantic trench usually pose little danger to humans, the greatest earthquake threat in North America is along the Pacific Coast. Sinkholes Sinkholes are a natural and common geologic feature in areas with underlying limestone and other rock types that are soluble in natural water.
    [Show full text]
  • Goal 7, Hazards
    HAZARDS (Goal 7) 1. OVERVIEW ....................................................................................................... 7-2 1.1 State Planning Requirements ................................................................ 7-2 1.2 Information Base .................................................................................... 7-4 2. FINDINGS AND POLICIES ............................................................................ 7-16 2.1 Landslides ........................................................................................... 7-16 2.2 Weak Bearing Soils ............................................................................. 7-18 2.3 Earthquakes ........................................................................................ 7-18 2.4 Erosion ................................................................................................ 7-19 2.5 Flooding .............................................................................................. 7-20 2.6 Tsunamis (Seismic Waves) ................................................................. 7-22 2.7 Groundwater ........................................................................................ 7-26 HAZARDS (Goal 7) 1. OVERVIEW The demand for land in Tillamook County is increasing rapidly and problems related to developing these lands are mounting. Because of the tractable ground already in use, new developments are being directed toward areas that were previously passed over. Unfortunately, many of the new areas are subject to some
    [Show full text]