A Study of the Nigerian 2019 Election Postponement Speech of INEC Chairman

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Study of the Nigerian 2019 Election Postponement Speech of INEC Chairman Ayo Osisanwo CJLS 8(2), 2020 Covenant Journal of Language Studies (CJLS) Vol. 8 No. 2, December, 2020 ISSN: p. 2354-3582 e. 2354-3523 An Open Access Journal Available Online Responsibilisation and Discourse: A Study of the Nigerian 2019 Election Postponement Speech of INEC Chairman Ayo Osisanwo University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria Received: June 1, 2020; Accepted: October 23, 2020 Date of Publication: December, 2020 Abstract: This paper identifies the discourse strategies and constructions in the representation of the postponement of the 2019 general elections in Nigeria. The INEC Chairman’s speech of the postponement shows how the electoral umpire ‘responsibilise’ involvements in the postponement of the Nigerian electoral project. Guided by aspects of Caffi’s deresponsibilisation and responsibilisation, and Hyland’s Stance theory, this paper subjects the 1624-word speech to discourse analysis. The analysis of the data revealed that there were two main constructions of the 2019 general elections postponement namely commitment to a successful electoral conduct and logistical challenges. The constructions were achieved through six discourse strategies: historical reference to antecedent success, emotional appeal and blackmail, self-glorification, blame avoidance and attribution, assuring and reassuring of control, and creating common ground. The INEC Chairman weakens excessive responsibility in order to safeguard his honour. Keywords: Deresponsibilisation and Responsibilisation, Independent National Electoral Commission, Speechmaking, Election Postponement, 2019 General Elections in Nigeria Introduction goals in different speeches such as acceptance speeches, inaugural speeches or Speechmaking as an art has become part of farewell speeches. The social or political the practice associated with political actors actors are influential people, that play a vital across the world. Suffice it to say that role in shaping issues in society and setting political leaders and actors alike use the boundaries of what is talked about and language to pursue their political agenda. how it is talked about (Henry and Tator, According to the Association of American 2002; Taiwo, 2008). Colleges and Universities, there are a core set of skills that are necessary ‘both for a Language scholars have emphasised the role globally engaged democracy and for a of context in language and the role of dynamic innovation fueled economy’ language in politics and elections. (Rhodes, 2010, p. 10), and speechmaking, According to Engholm (1965 cited in with particular reference to public speaking, Adeyanju (2002: 532), language is the key is listed as one of these core skills. Political to the heart of the people, if you lose it, you actors attempt to deploy the appropriate lose the people, if you keep it safe, it language usage to achieve their desired 1 Ayo Osisanwo CJLS 8(2), 2020 unlocks the people’s heart. Crystal (1987:2) From van Dijk’s submission, it can be observes that ‘since the use of language in argued that the speech of the INEC politics can easily hurt if it is unfeelingly Chairman cannot be said to be ideologically attacked, the user has to be conscious of its neutral. Hence, some questions are function as a public behaviour so that it is considered paramount to drive this study. easy for different usages to be noted’. What discourse strategies and ideological Language, which is used to drive the intent constructions have been deployed by the of the political actors to the heart of the INEC Chairman to represent the electorate, plays a significant role in postponement of the 2019 general elections political mobilisation. Politics involves in Nigeria? To what extent has the electoral wielding power and political actions are umpire responsibilised or deresponsibilised enacted through discursive formations (van involvement in the postponement of the Dijk, 2001). Van Dijk (2006:728) also 2019 general elections through ideological asserts that ‘politics is one of the social means? Thus, the aim of this paper is to domains whose practices are virtually identify the discourse strategies and exclusively discursive.’ The different constructions in the representation of the discursive choices made by the political postponement of the 2019 general elections actors, therefore, are consciously crafted in in Nigeria, and examine how the electoral order to persuade and convince the umpire ideologically responsibilises or electorate to belong to their camp. deresponsibilises involvement in the postponement. Political discourses can be broadly viewed as discourses that relate to political or Responsibilisation and electoral views. Van Dijk (2006:732-733) Deresponsibilisation argues that political discourse is defined in The introduction of the terms terms of political contexts; and that it is not “deresponsibilisation” and enough to observe that political discourse “responsibilisation” has been attributed to often features the renowned ‘political’ Caffi (2002, 2007). Respectively, the terms pronoun we, it is also vital to relate such use refer to the conceptualisation of uncertainty to such categories as who is speaking, when, and certainty in reports, events or utterances. where and with/to whom, that is, to specific In Caffi’s (2002:118) description, aspects of the political situation. In his “deresponsibilisation”, that is, paper, Politics, Ideology and Discourse, van “deresponsabilzzazione” or Dijk (2006:732) proposes a valuable “deresponsibilities” (2007:159), has to do framework for political discourse analysis with the act of avoiding responsibility, or a thus: ‘the social organisation of the field of text associated with “weakened politics, and hence of politicians and responsibility” (Caffi, 2007: 67). political groups, is largely based on Deresponsibilisation is achieved when a ideological differences, alliances, and speaker or rhetor consciously and or similarities. The overall organisation of deliberately avoids conflict, uses social beliefs as struggle between the left indirectness, deploys politeness-induced and the right is the result of the underlying vagueness, which Caffi (2002, 2007) polarisation of political ideologies that have labelled as “bush.” Deresponsibilisation, as permeated society as a whole. Elections, explained by Mey (forthcoming: 13) and parliaments, political campaigns, (Odebunmi, 2019), expresses certainty by propaganda, demonstrations, and many other the deployment of modified voices and phenomena of the political field are thus unclear choice of words. It “connotes the profoundly ideological,” and are reflective non-attributability of the ‘voices’ involved in some forms of political speeches. in uttering or writing” (Mey, forthcoming: 6). In other words, deresponsibilisation has 2 Ayo Osisanwo CJLS 8(2), 2020 to do with utterances that do not clearly This commission, which has evolved under commit the speaker or writer to the certainty different names, has conducted at least eight of a proposition. Responsibilisation, on the presidential elections in Nigeria, in the years other hand, has to do with the clear, 1979, 1993, 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015 unequivocal locution which directly and 2019. commits the speaker or rhetor to the During general elections in Nigeria, six certainty of their propositions. different elections are conducted within two Responsibilisation is seen in texts, speeches weeks. In the first week, three elections are or utterances devoid of hedges. It does not conducted – the Presidential, and the House convey information through another of Assembly elections. 109 senators elected utterer’s voice or the evocation of another across the 109 senatorial districts of the person’s authority. country and 360 members of the House of Representative. On a fortnight from the previous election, three other elections are Elections and the Electoral Commission held, namely the gubernatorial elections and the state House of Assembly and local in Nigeria government elections. Postponement of elections in Nigeria dates Nigeria gained its independence from back to 2011, when a parliamentary British rule in 1960 and was led by Dr. election that was to be held on April 2, was Nnamdi Azikiwe as the first President. postponed by two days to April 4, 2011. Nigeria has experienced three types of Also, the presidential election was shifted government from 1960 to 2015. From 1960 from April 9 to April 16. In 2015, the to 1966, it had a ceremonial government; general election was originally scheduled to from 1966-1979 and 1983-1999 Nigeria was hold on 14 February, but was postponed to ruled by military administrators. The 28 March for the presidential, senatorial and civilian government was voted to power house of representatives, while those of the from October 1, 1979 to December 31, 1983 governorship and state house of assemblies and May 29, 1999 to 2015, and remains in were postponed to 11 April 2015. In 2019, power from 2015 to date. There was also an the presidential and national assembly interim government of three months in 1993 elections were scheduled for 16 February (August – November). Under the 2019, while the governorship and state democratic government, especially since house of assemblies were scheduled for 2 1999, Nigeria became a Federal Republic March 2019. The elections were postponed with a democratically elected government by one week due to what INEC described as made up of three separate arms: executive, operational challenges. The elections were legislative and judiciary. Nigeria has been rescheduled for
Recommended publications
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Electoral Governance: Understanding the Democratic Quality of Elections in Nigeria Ibrahim Sani PhD Politics The University of Edinburgh 2015 Declaration I declare that except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is entirely my own work, and that no part of it has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ……………………….. Ibrahim Sani (s1144926) ii Asiya Usman Mani iii Table of Contents Declaration ................................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iv List
    [Show full text]
  • Republic, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa the First Prime Minister of Nigeria Dumped the ECN and Announced the Creation of the Federal Electoral Commission (FEC) with Mr
    republic, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa the first Prime Minister of Nigeria dumped the ECN and announced the creation of the Federal Electoral Commission (FEC) with Mr. Eyo Esua as its head. The FEC supervised and conducted the general elections of 1964 as well as the Western Region elections of 1965. The controversies that surrounded these elections especially the perceptions of the elections not being free, fair and credible has been adduced as one of the major reasons that truncated the first republic and brought in the military administration of General Aguiyi Ironsi. Sequel to the first military coup d’état, General Aguiyi Ironsi dissolved the FEC and it remained so until 1978 when the military administration of General Olusegun Obasanjo founded the Federal Electoral Commission (FEDECO) with Chief Michael Ani as the chairman. FEDECO organized the 1979 transitional elections that brought in the second republic with Alhaji Shehu Shagari of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) as the first executive president of Nigeria. Chief Michael Ani was subsequently replaced with Justice Ovie- Whisky by President Shehu Shagari as FEDECO chairman and he superintended the 1983 general elections which returned Alhaji Shehu Shagari as president. The controversies that trailed the 1983 general elections yet led to another military takeover which saw Major General Muhammadu Buhari as Head of State in December 1983 and later General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida in 1985. General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida dissolved FEDECO in 1987 and established the National Electoral Commission (NEC) with Professor Eme O. Awa as chairman and later in 1989 Professor Humphrey Nwosu was appointed as Chairman.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Education Handbook.Pdf
    CHAPTER 1 REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA Introduction Democracy is the form of government, in which the people of a country, state or local government area decide how they want to be governed. They also decide who should govern them. In doing these as well as in their day-to-day life, the people have all the basic freedoms of speech, association, assembly, conscience, etc. Such institutions as an independent judiciary, free press, competitive political parties and an active civil society also protect them. Objectives On the completion of this chapter, the reader should be able to: - narrate how representative democracy started in Nigeria - explain what a Constitution is - trace the development of the right to vote (franchise) in Nigeria - explain the structure of the three tiers of government - describe the process by which the people elect their government. Key Words/Ideas Key words Key Ideas Democracy Tiers of Government Constitution Political Parties Franchise Separation of Power Mandate Federation Elective Representation in Nigeria What is today known as Nigeria is a product of British Colonial rule. In 1914 the first Colonial Governor- General of Nigeria, Lord Frederick Luggard amalgamated the southern and northern protectorates to form Nigeria. Earlier on, another British explorer Mungo Park had discovered the River Niger; hence the name Nigeria literarily means Niger area. 1 Lord Frederick Luggard 1914 -1919 Nigeria remained a colony of Britain until October1, 1960. The British administered the country as three regions, namely: Northern, Western and Eastern. Each region had a government, which was responsible for the affairs of that region. This arrangement started in 1946 under the Richards Constitution – which was the first federal constitution of Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions : a Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound International Immersion Program Papers Student Papers 2019 Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions : a Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process Tiffany Chikamara [Kamara] Nwosu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ international_immersion_program_papers Recommended Citation Nwosu, Tiffany Chikamara [Kamara], "Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions : a Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process" (2019). International Immersion Program Papers. 120. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/international_immersion_program_papers/120 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Immersion Program Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions: A Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process Kamara Nwosu* Abstract This paper will discuss the aspects of constitutional tinkering and its impact on democratic institutions by looking into the constitutional tinkering in the Nigerian constitution and its impact on democratic institutions focusing mainly on the electoral system. As a caveat, this paper focuses on the electoral process within an electoral system and not the methods by which election systems are determined. Thus, the paper focuses on the administration of elections and not the system by which votes are to be cast such as plurality method, approval voting or simple majority vote. * J.D. Candidate 2020, The University of Chicago Law School; B.A. 2017, Boston University. This paper was produced as part of the author’s participation in the University of Chicago Law School’s 2019 International Immersion Program as well as an Independent Study directed under Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria: Planning and Prospects for the 2011 Elections
    Meeting Summary Nigeria: Planning and Prospects for the 2011 Elections Okechukwu Ibeanu Chief Technical Adviser, Independent National Electoral Commission, Nigeria Mark Stevens Adviser and Head of the Democracy Section, Commonwealth Secretariat Sola Tayo Associate Fellow, Africa Programme, Chatham House Chair: Dr Lola Banjoko Nigeria Leadership Initiative 8 October 2010 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions, but the ultimate responsibility for accuracy lies with this document’s author(s). The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. Meeting summary: Nigeria – Planning and Prospects for Elections in 2011 Professor Oke Ibeanu: One of the stories which recently captivated Nigerian society was a revelation by the former Governor of Cross River state, Donald Duke, where he laid out how state governors rig elections in Nigeria. INEC is a national body with 12 commissioners and a Chairman at federal level, and 37 state-level agencies each headed by a state-level electoral commissioner. It is said that the national body is irrelevant, and in fact the state-level agencies are key.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review
    International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review Volume: 02, Issue: 03 “May-June 2019” ISSN 2582-0176 ELECTION MANAGEMENT AND THE CHALLENGE OF ELECTORAL CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA’S 2015 GENERAL ELECTIONS AYITI, SAMUEL BABATOLA Department of Political Science Ekiti State University, Nigeria MIKE OMILUSI Department of Political Science Ekiti State University, Nigeria ABSTRACT The conduct of free, fair and credible elections in Nigeria has always been problematic due largely to the challenges of corruption. Corruption, no doubt, is a cankerworm that has permeated Nigeria’s national life. One of the elements of election is its periodicity. In fact, this is one of the foundations upon which good governance is erected. It is also the hallmark of democracy which guarantees citizens’ effective participation in the political process. A truly independent, non-partisan and incorruptible electoral management body is synonymous with credible elections. However, the impartiality and integrity of the various electoral commissions in Nigeria over the years have been called to question due to the alleged romance of the electoral bodies with the ruling party with a view to conferring undue advantage on it during elections. To achieve this, some staff of the electoral bodies is compromised by the ruling party officials by offering them bribes to do their bidding. Such an attitude has major implications on the electoral process and ultimately on good governance as in most cases the legitimacy of such public officers produced through this method is always called to question. The objective of the study is to assess the causes and impacts of electoral corruption on Nigeria’s electoral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Management Bodies in West Africa a Comparative Study of the Contribution of Electoral Commissions to the Strengthening of Democracy
    Election Management Bodies in West Africa A comparative study of the contribution of electoral commissions to the strengthening of democracy By Ismaila Madior Fall Mathias Hounkpe Adele L. Jinadu Pascal Kambale A review by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for West Africa Copyright © 2011, Open Society Initiative for West Africa. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by: Open Society Foundations For more information contact: AfriMAP / Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA) P O Box 678 Wits, 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] www.afrimap. org Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA) BP 008, Dakar-Fann, Dakar, Senegal www.osiwa.org Layout and printing: COMPRESS.dsl, South Africa Contents Preface v Methodology and acknowledgments vii 1 Overview: The contribution of electoral management bodies to credible elections in West Africa – Pascal Kambale 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Colonial legacy 2 C. Elections and constitutional reforms 3 D. Membership of EMBs and appointment of Electoral Commissioners 4 E. Independence and effectiveness 4 F. Common challenges to electoral management 8 G. Conclusion 9 H. Recommendations 10 2 Benin – Mathias Hounkpe 12 A. Summary 12 B. Historical background 13 C. The Autonomous National Electoral Commission (CENA) 19 D. Funding of elections in Benin 31 E. Electoral disputes in Benin 34 F. Critical assessment of the CENA’s performance 36 G. Recommendations 47 3 Cape Verde – Ismaila Madior Fall 49 A. Summary 49 B. Constitutional development, party politics and electoral history 51 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Credibility and the Prospects of Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: the Role of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
    www.idosr.org Udu ©IDOSR PUBLICATIONS International Digital Organization for Scientific Research ISSN: 2579-082X IDOSR JOURNAL OF BANKING, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 4(1): 13-24, 2019. Electoral Credibility and the Prospects of Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: The Role of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Larry E. Udu Department of Public Administration Ebonyi State University ABSTRACT The paper examines the power and responsibilities of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in electoral administrations in the country and the implications of the institution's under-performance on democratic consolidation in Nigeria. Content Analytical Approach was adopted and the systems theory propounded by David Easton was used as theoretical foundation. The paper reveals that there has been fundamental and institutional constraints which subject INEC to government/political manipulations, a situation that is inimical for democratic consolidation in the country. INEC performance in the 2015 general elections notwithstanding, the body ought to be autonomous in all ramifications so as to be able to discharge its duties impartially and responsibly and hence, consolidate democracy in Nigeria by the instrumentality of credible elections. Keywords: INEC, electoral, credibility, democratic consolidation and Nigeria. INTRODUCTION Elections are fundamentally the central institution of democratic Be that as it may, experiences over governments. This is because, in an the years, have shown that, despite ideal democracy, the authority of the painstaking efforts at electoral government derives purely from the reforms in Nigeria, the electoral consent of the electorate; hence, the institution (INEC) has not been truly principal platform for securing and independent, rather, it has operated translating that consent into like a parastatal of the executive or governmental authority results from ruling party of the time and this, periodically conducting credible results to high level electoral elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 27 Nigeria and the Politics of Unreason 7/21/2008
    Nigeria and the Politics of Unreason Page 1 of 27 Nigeria and the Politics of Unreason: Political Assassinations, Decampments, Moneybags, and Public Protests By Victor E. Dike Introduction The problems facing Nigeria emanate from many fronts, which include irrational behavior (actions) of the political elite, politics of division, and politics devoid of political ideology. Others factors are corruption and poverty, lack of distributive justice, regional, and religious cleavages. All these combine to create crises (riots and conflicts) in the polity, culminating in public desperation and insecurity, politics of assassinations, decampments (carpet crossing), moneybags, and public protests. All this reached its climax during the 2003 elections. When the nation thinks it is shifting away from these forces, they would somersault and clash again creating another political thunderstorm. It looks that the society would hardly outgrow ‘the politics of unreason’ (Lipset and Raab, 1970), which is often politics of extremism, because the political class is always going beyond the limits of what are reasonable to secure or retain political power. During the 2003 elections moneybags (instead of political ideology) directed political actions in political parties; and it also influenced the activities of many politicians. As a result, the presidential candidates of the two major political parties (PDP and ANPP) cliched their party tickets by stuffing the car boots, so to say, of their party delegates with Ghana-Must- Go bags. This frustrated and intimidated their political opponents within (and those in the other minor political parties). Since after his defeat by Chief Olusegun Obasanjo in the 2003 PDP primary in Abuja, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Transition to Civil Rule in Nigeria & Ghana 1960 - 2000
    A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSITION TO CIVIL RULE IN NIGERIA & GHANA 1960 - 2000 BY ESEW NTIM GYAKARI DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA DECEMBER, 2001 A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSITION TO CIVIL RULE IN NIGERIA & GHANA 1960 - 2000 BY ESEW NTIM GYAKARI (PH.D/FASS/06107/1993-94) BEING A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PH.D) IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA. DECEMBER, 2001. DEDICATION TO ETERNAL GLORY OF GOD DECLARATION I, ESEW, NTIM GYAKARI WITH REG No PH .D/FASS/06107/93-94 DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME AND IT IS THE PRODUCT OF MY RESEARCH WORK. IT HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED IN ANY PREVIOUS APPLICATION FOR A DEGREE. ALL QUOTATIONS ARE INDICATED BY QUOTATION MARKS OR BY INDENTATION AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY MEANS OF REFERENCES. CERTIFICATION This dissertation entitled A Critical Analysis Of Transition To Civil Rule In Nigeria And Ghana 1960 - 2000' meets the regulation governing the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) Political Science of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria and is approved for its contribution to knowledge and literary presentation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Any serious intellectual activity such as this could hardly materialize without reference to works by numerous authors. They are duly acknowledged with gratitude in the bibliography. My heartfelt gratitude goes to my Supervisors, Dr Andrew Iwini Ohwona (Chairman) and Dr Ejembi A Unobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Process and Peaceful Transition in Nigeria
    Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN 2155-7993, USA September 2015, Volume 5, No. 9, pp. 920–926 Doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/09.05.2015/012 © Academic Star Publishing Company, 2015 http://www.academicstar.us Electoral Process and Peaceful Transition in Nigeria: The Role of the Theatre Umenyilorah Chukwukelue Uzodinma (Department of Theatre and Media Arts, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria) Abstract: Africa to which Nigeria belongs in all ramifications has recorded the gains and losses in all aspects of life. Having shared a common history of colonization and its attendant challenges, Nigeria is placed similar amongst other African and most nations of the world that shared similar history that are still struggling to holistically improve in its level of efficiency. But a closer juxtaposition of Nigeria and most countries that have enjoyed about five decades of independence clearly brings to the fore obvious malaise characterizing this multi-culturally rich black giant of Africa. This raises the question of what does Nigeria either do or ignore that other countries have since perfected thereby overtaking her in terms of global rating of development. The obvious answer lies in leadership style. The political leadership of Nigeria, though striving to attain improved efficiency, for so long has been adversely faced by the obvious challenge of transparent and peaceful transition from one tenure or regime to the other. This paper will analyze the existence of electoral process and regulatory electoral body in Nigeria with the view of, not just empowering the electoral body but the electorate in terms of knowledge- via theatrical endeavours, with the sole aim of achieving a violent-free political transition; through the process of politics of entertainment that will ensure freedom and growth in Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN of the NAME NIGERIA Nigeria As Country
    THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME NIGERIA Help our youth the truth to know Nigeria as country is located in West In love and Honesty to grow Africa between latitude 40 – 140 North of the And living just and true equator and longitude 30 – 140 East of the Greenwich meridian. Great lofty heights attain The name Nigeria was given by the Miss To build a nation where peace Flora Shaw in 1898 who later married Fredrick Lord Lugard who amalgamated the Northern And justice shall reign and Southern Protectorates of Nigeria in the NYSC ANTHEM year 1914 and died in 1945. Youth obey the Clarion call The official language is English and the Nation’s motto is UNITY AND FAITH, PEACE AND Let us lift our Nation high PROGRESS. Under the sun or in the rain NATIONAL ANTHEM With dedication, and selflessness Arise, O Compatriots, Nigeria’s call obey Nigeria is ours, Nigeria we serve. To serve our fatherland NIGERIA COAT OF ARMS With love and strength and faith Representation of Components The labour of our hero’s past - The Black Shield represents the good Shall never be in vain soil of Nigeria - The Eagle represents the Strength of To serve with heart and Might Nigeria One nation bound in freedom, - The Two Horses stands for dignity and pride Peace and unity. - The Y represent River Niger and River Benue. THE PLEDGE THE NIGERIAN FLAG I Pledge to Nigeria my Country The Nigeria flag has two colours To be faithful loyal and honest (Green and White) To serve Nigeria with all my strength - The Green part represents Agriculture To defend her unity - The White represents Unity and Peace.
    [Show full text]