DOCSLIB.ORG

Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: Progress and Challenges

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: Progress and Challenges Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter) Vol. 5, No.5; December 2015 DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION IN NIGERIA: PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES Okeke, Remi Chukwudi Department of Public Administration and Local Government, University of Nigeria, Nsukka Email: [email protected] Phone: 2348035523818 Abstract We have in this study, identified democratic consolidation as a process and not a realization. In this process, therefore, the nature of democratic consolidation in Nigeria has been characterized by the determination of the nation’s political actors to squarely face the challenges of the surrounding vicissitudes of democracy. We have essentially in the study, identified some of the features of the progress made in democratic consolidation in Nigeria within the period of focus (1999- 2015). We have examined the nature of the attendant challenges and made some far- reaching recommendations on how to enhance the chances of democratic consolidation in this West African nation-state. Keywords: Democracy, Democratic Consolidation, Nigeria, Progress, Challenges INTRODUCTION The Nigerian state is a study in political and developmental unpredictability - a nation that in empirical terms continuously contradicts political bookmakers. Thus, as this West African nation-state trudges on in nation building, she has continued to negate every uncharitable visioning. In this process, within and outside her territorial confines, Nigeria has continued to defeat the numerous naysayers whose positions had attempted to create immense wedges, for the nation’s ambitions and aspirations - the hopes and aspirations that continue to hold her together, despite the darkest political astrology (Adebanwi & Obadare 2010). Many insiders in Nigeria (and outsiders also) know that this same country is not working (see Kukah 2012; Coulter 2013). Very many scholars therefore have remained amazed by this Nigerian contradiction - a country that is working and is not working. Furthermore, Amuwo (2009) had described Nigeria as witnessing a democracy, political, economic and development impasse. Has the situation grown less traumatic? To some scholars therefore looking at Nigeria, it would appear as if British colonialism actually left an indelible conservative imprimatur on the country’s politics and society. The general perception of an otherwise informed public opinion in this regard; is that ‘the British 21 Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter) Vol. 5, No.5; December 2015 programmed Nigeria to fail’ (Amuwo 2009). Indeed, Adebanwi & Obadare (2010) succinctly present the dejection that characterizes Nigerian analysis as follows: Nigeria offers a magnificent template for examining the chronic schizophrenia that characterizes the African postcolonial state and the resulting social (de)formations that (re)compose, and are, in turn, (re)composed by, the state. Although rigged against reason and rhythm from its very conception and inception, Nigeria ironically, contains perhaps the greatest combination and concentration of human and natural resources that can be (re)mobilized in creating an African power state with a capacity to stand at the vortex, if not the centre of continental revival and racial renewal. This paradox raises a fundamental question: Why have the socio-economic and political actualities of, and in, Nigeria, been historically (permanently?) subversive of her potentialities? Thus, here and there, there are dark prognoses and invidious conclusions about this crippled giant (Osaghae 1998), a country whose common future as a united polity has been severally questioned as a possibility by many of its frustrated citizens (Adebanwi & Obadare 2010). Bourne (2015) thus adds that the year 2015 may be another in which Nigeria seems to teeter on the edge of the abyss but it would be surprising if it were to fall in. Bourne was alluding to the tendencies of political bookmakers who envisioned doom and destruction as the aftermath of the 2015 general elections in Nigeria. The elections have since been conducted, won and lost and the unpredictable Nigeria State did not break up. Hence this study was actually conducted as preparations were being made for a change of baton in the governance of Nigeria, after the candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC), Retired General Muhammadu Buhari, defeated the sitting President of Nigeria, Dr Goodluck Ebele Jonathan, in the 2015 Presidential election1. In democratic configurations, all this present the portrait of democratic consolidation, particularly from 1999, when the country returned to the path of democracy, after the long period of military aberration. Consequently, the general objective of this study is to establish the nature of the democratic consolidation in Nigeria. The specific objectives are to (i) identify the features of the noticeable progress in democratic consolidation in Nigeria (ii) examine the nature of the attendant challenges and (iii) make recommendations on how to enhance the chances of democratic consolidation in this West African country.2 DEMOCRATIC CONSOLIDATION: A CONCEPTUAL ELUCIDATION The apposite place to begin the conceptual elucidation on democratic consolidation is perhaps the operationalization of the concept of democracy itself. Therefore, democracy in this study stands for a people-centered system of government, which entails periodic popular elections, in which the sanctity of the electoral process is strictly guaranteed. Implicit in this position is the connotation that democracy not only allows mass participation, by way of encouraging the electorate to participate in the selection of their representatives, but also that democracy is nourished by transparency and accountability in public administration (Yagboyaju 2013). It should be emphasized that democracy thrives better in many parts of the world where there are also strong democratic institutions. In other words, democratic principles thrive and are more effective when they are supported by strong institutions of modern government (Yagboyaju 22 Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter) Vol. 5, No.5; December 2015 2013). Therefore, when Yagboyaju, cites Ake (1996) as opining that democracy is about principles rather than about institutional forms, there appears to be a contentious issue in this proposition. According to Yagboyaju, Ake had argued that it is the principles of public accountability, mass participation, majority rule, and minority rights that define democracy as a concept. Thus, citing Mimiko (2010), Yagboyaju concludes that it follows therefore, that any political system that provides for these principles qualifies to be called a democracy (anyone that does not, no matter the majesty of physical infrastructure of democracy put in place, cannot justifiably refer to itself as a democracy). The problematic issue here is that the sanctity of these principles is a function of the majesty of physical democratic infrastructure – the excellence of strong democratic institutions. Hence, according to Ogundiya (2009) cited in Akubo and Yakubu (2014), democratic consolidation is about regime maintenance and about regarding the key political institutions as the only framework for political contestation and adherence to the democratic rules of the game. Democratic consolidation should therefore consequently connote a consistent and sustained practice of democratic principles (Yagboyaju 2013). Beyond conceptual orthodoxy however, democratic consolidation might as well be denoted as when democracy is being consolidated (when democracy is being consolidated in defence of the people-centeredness of the precepts of democracy). Democracy is therefore, a system of government and a system of defence. It is a system for defending the powers of the people against usurpation by political goons. Democracy defends the hopes of a people against onslaught by sundry intruders. Therefore, in the context of developing democracies, the stronger the defence mechanisms of democracy the nearer the tendencies of the system towards democratic consolidation. Hence, democratic consolidation critically refers to the growing of the defence mechanisms of democracy. Consequently, democratic consolidation is a process. It is not an accomplishment. Some scholars tend to view democratic consolidation as a realization – an achievement. According to Valenzuela (1990) cited in Akubo and Yakubu (2014), the building of a consolidated democracy involves in part an affirmation and strengthening of certain institutions, such as the electoral system, revitalized or newly created parties, judicial independence and respect for human rights, which have been created or recreated during the course of the transition. In this context, democratic consolidation becomes a post-transitional condition, curiously akin to some developmental fixity. Yagboyaju (2013) further opines that democratic consolidation could be said to effectively prevail in most mature and advanced democracies of the world, where many of the prominent democratic principles largely constitute the political culture. But democratic consolidation is a lot more than all of this. In fact, democratic consolidation is a feature of all democracies. While the need for building the defence mechanisms of democracy may be more pronounced in emerging democracies, all democracies are prone to attacks that necessitate the fortification of democracy. It is this process of fortification that is democratic consolidation. Democratic consolidation therefore
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2015 Annual Report of the Women’S Health and Action Research Centre (WHARC)
    Advancing National Understanding of the Socio-economic, Educational and Reproductive Health Needs of Nigerian Women and Youth The 2014-2015 Annual Report of the Women’s Health and Action Research Centre (WHARC) WHARC ANNUAL REPORT: JULY 1, 2014 – JUNE 30, 2015 About WHARC WHARC is a non-governmental, non-profit organization established in 1993. It consists of a multi-disciplinary team of health, social science and legal professionals and researchers working together to build the knowledge base and to improve the policy environment for advancing women’s health in Africa. To date, the Centre has conducted formative and intervention research that documents the socio-cultural determinants of women’s health and that provides critical data for developing policies and programs for scaling up best practices relating to women’s health in the region. In particular, our niche is to use the results of research to build public health awareness and to advocate for policy changes about critical sexual and reproductive health issues in Nigeria. WHARC also publishes the African Journal of Reproductive Health (AJRH) (www.ajrh.info), now widely recognized as the leading journal that promotes sexual and reproductive health and the principles of sexual rights, equity and social justice in sub- Saharan Africa. Our Mission Grounded in a deep love of humanity and a belief in equality and dignity for all people, WHARC works to improve the reproductive health and social wellbeing of women and adolescents in Africa so they can lead productive, fulfilling lives and provide a healthy future for their children. Through its cutting edge research, WHARC educates women, youth, community gatekeepers and policymakers about sexual and reproductive health, and advocates for policy change at the local, state and federal level.
    [Show full text]
  • This Thesis Has Been Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for a Postgraduate Degree (E.G
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. Electoral Governance: Understanding the Democratic Quality of Elections in Nigeria Ibrahim Sani PhD Politics The University of Edinburgh 2015 Declaration I declare that except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is entirely my own work, and that no part of it has been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification. ……………………….. Ibrahim Sani (s1144926) ii Asiya Usman Mani iii Table of Contents Declaration ................................................................................................................................ ii Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... iv List
    [Show full text]
  • Republic, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa the First Prime Minister of Nigeria Dumped the ECN and Announced the Creation of the Federal Electoral Commission (FEC) with Mr
    republic, Sir Abubakar Tafawa Balewa the first Prime Minister of Nigeria dumped the ECN and announced the creation of the Federal Electoral Commission (FEC) with Mr. Eyo Esua as its head. The FEC supervised and conducted the general elections of 1964 as well as the Western Region elections of 1965. The controversies that surrounded these elections especially the perceptions of the elections not being free, fair and credible has been adduced as one of the major reasons that truncated the first republic and brought in the military administration of General Aguiyi Ironsi. Sequel to the first military coup d’état, General Aguiyi Ironsi dissolved the FEC and it remained so until 1978 when the military administration of General Olusegun Obasanjo founded the Federal Electoral Commission (FEDECO) with Chief Michael Ani as the chairman. FEDECO organized the 1979 transitional elections that brought in the second republic with Alhaji Shehu Shagari of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN) as the first executive president of Nigeria. Chief Michael Ani was subsequently replaced with Justice Ovie- Whisky by President Shehu Shagari as FEDECO chairman and he superintended the 1983 general elections which returned Alhaji Shehu Shagari as president. The controversies that trailed the 1983 general elections yet led to another military takeover which saw Major General Muhammadu Buhari as Head of State in December 1983 and later General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida in 1985. General Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida dissolved FEDECO in 1987 and established the National Electoral Commission (NEC) with Professor Eme O. Awa as chairman and later in 1989 Professor Humphrey Nwosu was appointed as Chairman.
    [Show full text]
  • Voter Education Handbook.Pdf
    CHAPTER 1 REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY IN NIGERIA Introduction Democracy is the form of government, in which the people of a country, state or local government area decide how they want to be governed. They also decide who should govern them. In doing these as well as in their day-to-day life, the people have all the basic freedoms of speech, association, assembly, conscience, etc. Such institutions as an independent judiciary, free press, competitive political parties and an active civil society also protect them. Objectives On the completion of this chapter, the reader should be able to: - narrate how representative democracy started in Nigeria - explain what a Constitution is - trace the development of the right to vote (franchise) in Nigeria - explain the structure of the three tiers of government - describe the process by which the people elect their government. Key Words/Ideas Key words Key Ideas Democracy Tiers of Government Constitution Political Parties Franchise Separation of Power Mandate Federation Elective Representation in Nigeria What is today known as Nigeria is a product of British Colonial rule. In 1914 the first Colonial Governor- General of Nigeria, Lord Frederick Luggard amalgamated the southern and northern protectorates to form Nigeria. Earlier on, another British explorer Mungo Park had discovered the River Niger; hence the name Nigeria literarily means Niger area. 1 Lord Frederick Luggard 1914 -1919 Nigeria remained a colony of Britain until October1, 1960. The British administered the country as three regions, namely: Northern, Western and Eastern. Each region had a government, which was responsible for the affairs of that region. This arrangement started in 1946 under the Richards Constitution – which was the first federal constitution of Nigeria.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions : a Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound International Immersion Program Papers Student Papers 2019 Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions : a Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process Tiffany Chikamara [Kamara] Nwosu [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/ international_immersion_program_papers Recommended Citation Nwosu, Tiffany Chikamara [Kamara], "Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions : a Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process" (2019). International Immersion Program Papers. 120. https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/international_immersion_program_papers/120 This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Papers at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in International Immersion Program Papers by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Constitutional Tinkering and Democratic Institutions: A Case Study of the 2019 Electoral Process Kamara Nwosu* Abstract This paper will discuss the aspects of constitutional tinkering and its impact on democratic institutions by looking into the constitutional tinkering in the Nigerian constitution and its impact on democratic institutions focusing mainly on the electoral system. As a caveat, this paper focuses on the electoral process within an electoral system and not the methods by which election systems are determined. Thus, the paper focuses on the administration of elections and not the system by which votes are to be cast such as plurality method, approval voting or simple majority vote. * J.D. Candidate 2020, The University of Chicago Law School; B.A. 2017, Boston University. This paper was produced as part of the author’s participation in the University of Chicago Law School’s 2019 International Immersion Program as well as an Independent Study directed under Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria: Planning and Prospects for the 2011 Elections
    Meeting Summary Nigeria: Planning and Prospects for the 2011 Elections Okechukwu Ibeanu Chief Technical Adviser, Independent National Electoral Commission, Nigeria Mark Stevens Adviser and Head of the Democracy Section, Commonwealth Secretariat Sola Tayo Associate Fellow, Africa Programme, Chatham House Chair: Dr Lola Banjoko Nigeria Leadership Initiative 8 October 2010 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions, but the ultimate responsibility for accuracy lies with this document’s author(s). The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. Meeting summary: Nigeria – Planning and Prospects for Elections in 2011 Professor Oke Ibeanu: One of the stories which recently captivated Nigerian society was a revelation by the former Governor of Cross River state, Donald Duke, where he laid out how state governors rig elections in Nigeria. INEC is a national body with 12 commissioners and a Chairman at federal level, and 37 state-level agencies each headed by a state-level electoral commissioner. It is said that the national body is irrelevant, and in fact the state-level agencies are key.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review
    International Journal of Social Sciences and Management Review Volume: 02, Issue: 03 “May-June 2019” ISSN 2582-0176 ELECTION MANAGEMENT AND THE CHALLENGE OF ELECTORAL CORRUPTION IN NIGERIA’S 2015 GENERAL ELECTIONS AYITI, SAMUEL BABATOLA Department of Political Science Ekiti State University, Nigeria MIKE OMILUSI Department of Political Science Ekiti State University, Nigeria ABSTRACT The conduct of free, fair and credible elections in Nigeria has always been problematic due largely to the challenges of corruption. Corruption, no doubt, is a cankerworm that has permeated Nigeria’s national life. One of the elements of election is its periodicity. In fact, this is one of the foundations upon which good governance is erected. It is also the hallmark of democracy which guarantees citizens’ effective participation in the political process. A truly independent, non-partisan and incorruptible electoral management body is synonymous with credible elections. However, the impartiality and integrity of the various electoral commissions in Nigeria over the years have been called to question due to the alleged romance of the electoral bodies with the ruling party with a view to conferring undue advantage on it during elections. To achieve this, some staff of the electoral bodies is compromised by the ruling party officials by offering them bribes to do their bidding. Such an attitude has major implications on the electoral process and ultimately on good governance as in most cases the legitimacy of such public officers produced through this method is always called to question. The objective of the study is to assess the causes and impacts of electoral corruption on Nigeria’s electoral system.
    [Show full text]
  • Election Management Bodies in West Africa a Comparative Study of the Contribution of Electoral Commissions to the Strengthening of Democracy
    Election Management Bodies in West Africa A comparative study of the contribution of electoral commissions to the strengthening of democracy By Ismaila Madior Fall Mathias Hounkpe Adele L. Jinadu Pascal Kambale A review by AfriMAP and the Open Society Initiative for West Africa Copyright © 2011, Open Society Initiative for West Africa. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form, or by any means, without the prior permission of the publisher. Published by: Open Society Foundations For more information contact: AfriMAP / Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa (OSISA) P O Box 678 Wits, 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa [email protected] www.afrimap. org Open Society Initiative for West Africa (OSIWA) BP 008, Dakar-Fann, Dakar, Senegal www.osiwa.org Layout and printing: COMPRESS.dsl, South Africa Contents Preface v Methodology and acknowledgments vii 1 Overview: The contribution of electoral management bodies to credible elections in West Africa – Pascal Kambale 1 A. Introduction 1 B. Colonial legacy 2 C. Elections and constitutional reforms 3 D. Membership of EMBs and appointment of Electoral Commissioners 4 E. Independence and effectiveness 4 F. Common challenges to electoral management 8 G. Conclusion 9 H. Recommendations 10 2 Benin – Mathias Hounkpe 12 A. Summary 12 B. Historical background 13 C. The Autonomous National Electoral Commission (CENA) 19 D. Funding of elections in Benin 31 E. Electoral disputes in Benin 34 F. Critical assessment of the CENA’s performance 36 G. Recommendations 47 3 Cape Verde – Ismaila Madior Fall 49 A. Summary 49 B. Constitutional development, party politics and electoral history 51 C.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Credibility and the Prospects of Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: the Role of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)
    www.idosr.org Udu ©IDOSR PUBLICATIONS International Digital Organization for Scientific Research ISSN: 2579-082X IDOSR JOURNAL OF BANKING, ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES 4(1): 13-24, 2019. Electoral Credibility and the Prospects of Democratic Consolidation in Nigeria: The Role of Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) Larry E. Udu Department of Public Administration Ebonyi State University ABSTRACT The paper examines the power and responsibilities of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) in electoral administrations in the country and the implications of the institution's under-performance on democratic consolidation in Nigeria. Content Analytical Approach was adopted and the systems theory propounded by David Easton was used as theoretical foundation. The paper reveals that there has been fundamental and institutional constraints which subject INEC to government/political manipulations, a situation that is inimical for democratic consolidation in the country. INEC performance in the 2015 general elections notwithstanding, the body ought to be autonomous in all ramifications so as to be able to discharge its duties impartially and responsibly and hence, consolidate democracy in Nigeria by the instrumentality of credible elections. Keywords: INEC, electoral, credibility, democratic consolidation and Nigeria. INTRODUCTION Elections are fundamentally the central institution of democratic Be that as it may, experiences over governments. This is because, in an the years, have shown that, despite ideal democracy, the authority of the painstaking efforts at electoral government derives purely from the reforms in Nigeria, the electoral consent of the electorate; hence, the institution (INEC) has not been truly principal platform for securing and independent, rather, it has operated translating that consent into like a parastatal of the executive or governmental authority results from ruling party of the time and this, periodically conducting credible results to high level electoral elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Conference Paper by Tunde Oyekanmi
    2015 GENERAL ELECTIONS AND THE ROLE OF INEC BY BABATUNDE OYEKANMI DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF IBADAN, IBADAN. +234-8033850990 [email protected] Abstract The end of the cold war in 1990s necessitated nations which were hitherto autocratic to adopt liberal democracy. Since then democracy has continued to gain ground. Democracy as the game in town cannot be without election. Therefore, as democracy progressed election also progressed. In Nigeria, democracy has been sustained since the return to democracy in 1999. Although, there cannot be a democracy without election yet effective election cannot be without a coordinated Election Management Body (EMB). Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) since 1999 has played a prominent role at ensuring the effective administration of elections in Nigeria. Sixteen years into the fourth republic, INEC has conducted five successful elections. In fact, the 2015 general elections have been adjudged by international observers as the best election so far in Africa. This is because of the marshaling of new technology and innovations put in place by INEC to improve the electioneering process in Nigeria. This paper explored the 2015 general elections and the role of INEC in its successful outcome. The paper contends that with effective management and further innovations, INEC will become one of the EMBs to be reckoned with not only Africa but globally. 1 Introduction Since the return to democratic dispensation in 1999, Nigeria and Nigerians have been yearning for democratic consolidation. Although she has successfully transited from Military despotism to democracy and from one democratic dispensation to another at least five times- 1999-2003, 2003-007, 2007-2011 and 2011-2015 yet the country still yearns for democratic consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of Transition to Civil Rule in Nigeria & Ghana 1960 - 2000
    A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSITION TO CIVIL RULE IN NIGERIA & GHANA 1960 - 2000 BY ESEW NTIM GYAKARI DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA DECEMBER, 2001 A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSITION TO CIVIL RULE IN NIGERIA & GHANA 1960 - 2000 BY ESEW NTIM GYAKARI (PH.D/FASS/06107/1993-94) BEING A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY (PH.D) IN POLITICAL SCIENCE DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, AHMADU BELLO UNIVERSITY, ZARIA. DECEMBER, 2001. DEDICATION TO ETERNAL GLORY OF GOD DECLARATION I, ESEW, NTIM GYAKARI WITH REG No PH .D/FASS/06107/93-94 DO HEREBY DECLARE THAT THIS DISSERTATION HAS BEEN PREPARED BY ME AND IT IS THE PRODUCT OF MY RESEARCH WORK. IT HAS NOT BEEN ACCEPTED IN ANY PREVIOUS APPLICATION FOR A DEGREE. ALL QUOTATIONS ARE INDICATED BY QUOTATION MARKS OR BY INDENTATION AND ACKNOWLEDGED BY MEANS OF REFERENCES. CERTIFICATION This dissertation entitled A Critical Analysis Of Transition To Civil Rule In Nigeria And Ghana 1960 - 2000' meets the regulation governing the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D) Political Science of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria and is approved for its contribution to knowledge and literary presentation. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Any serious intellectual activity such as this could hardly materialize without reference to works by numerous authors. They are duly acknowledged with gratitude in the bibliography. My heartfelt gratitude goes to my Supervisors, Dr Andrew Iwini Ohwona (Chairman) and Dr Ejembi A Unobe.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Process and Peaceful Transition in Nigeria
    Journal of Modern Education Review, ISSN 2155-7993, USA September 2015, Volume 5, No. 9, pp. 920–926 Doi: 10.15341/jmer(2155-7993)/09.05.2015/012 © Academic Star Publishing Company, 2015 http://www.academicstar.us Electoral Process and Peaceful Transition in Nigeria: The Role of the Theatre Umenyilorah Chukwukelue Uzodinma (Department of Theatre and Media Arts, Federal University Oye-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria) Abstract: Africa to which Nigeria belongs in all ramifications has recorded the gains and losses in all aspects of life. Having shared a common history of colonization and its attendant challenges, Nigeria is placed similar amongst other African and most nations of the world that shared similar history that are still struggling to holistically improve in its level of efficiency. But a closer juxtaposition of Nigeria and most countries that have enjoyed about five decades of independence clearly brings to the fore obvious malaise characterizing this multi-culturally rich black giant of Africa. This raises the question of what does Nigeria either do or ignore that other countries have since perfected thereby overtaking her in terms of global rating of development. The obvious answer lies in leadership style. The political leadership of Nigeria, though striving to attain improved efficiency, for so long has been adversely faced by the obvious challenge of transparent and peaceful transition from one tenure or regime to the other. This paper will analyze the existence of electoral process and regulatory electoral body in Nigeria with the view of, not just empowering the electoral body but the electorate in terms of knowledge- via theatrical endeavours, with the sole aim of achieving a violent-free political transition; through the process of politics of entertainment that will ensure freedom and growth in Nigeria.
    [Show full text]