Chapter 12 Calc Macros Automating Repetitive Tasks Copyright
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Open Source Used in DNAC-Wide Area Bonjour Magneto
Open Source Used In DNAC-Wide Area Bonjour Magneto Cisco Systems, Inc. www.cisco.com Cisco has more than 200 offices worldwide. Addresses, phone numbers, and fax numbers are listed on the Cisco website at www.cisco.com/go/offices. Text Part Number: 78EE117C99-1090203837 Open Source Used In DNAC-Wide Area Bonjour Magneto 1 This document contains licenses and notices for open source software used in this product. With respect to the free/open source software listed in this document, if you have any questions or wish to receive a copy of any source code to which you may be entitled under the applicable free/open source license(s) (such as the GNU Lesser/General Public License), please contact us at [email protected]. In your requests please include the following reference number 78EE117C99-1090203837 Contents 1.1 javax-activation 1.2.0 1.1.1 Available under license 1.2 metrics-servlets 3.1.0 1.3 mongodb-driver 3.0.4 1.4 jaxb-core 2.3.0 1.4.1 Available under license 1.5 antlr 2.7.6 1.5.1 Available under license 1.6 spring-boot-autoconfigure 1.5.12.RELEASE 1.7 spring-instrument 4.3.19.RELEASE 1.7.1 Available under license 1.8 nimbus-jose-jwt 4.3.1 1.9 javax-inject 1 1.9.1 Available under license 1.10 json-smart 1.3.1 1.11 opentracing-util 0.31.0 1.12 xpp3-min 1.1.3.4.O 1.12.1 Notifications 1.12.2 Available under license 1.13 ojdbc 6 1.14 jax-ws-api 2.3.0 1.15 aspect-j 1.9.2 1.15.1 Available under license 1.16 jetty-util 9.3.27.v20190418 1.17 unirest-java 1.4.5 1.18 jetty-continuation 9.3.27.v20190418 Open Source Used In -
Administration and Configuration Guide
Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization 6.4 Administration and Configuration Guide This guide is for administrators. Last Updated: 2018-09-26 Red Hat JBoss Data Virtualization 6.4 Administration and Configuration Guide This guide is for administrators. Red Hat Customer Content Services Legal Notice Copyright © 2018 Red Hat, Inc. This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. If you distribute this document, or a modified version of it, you must provide attribution to Red Hat, Inc. and provide a link to the original. If the document is modified, all Red Hat trademarks must be removed. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries. Node.js ® is an official trademark of Joyent. Red Hat Software Collections is not formally related to or endorsed by the official Joyent Node.js open source or commercial project. -
Rexx Programmer's Reference
01_579967 ffirs.qxd 2/3/05 9:00 PM Page i Rexx Programmer’s Reference Howard Fosdick 01_579967 ffirs.qxd 2/3/05 9:00 PM Page iv 01_579967 ffirs.qxd 2/3/05 9:00 PM Page i Rexx Programmer’s Reference Howard Fosdick 01_579967 ffirs.qxd 2/3/05 9:00 PM Page ii Rexx Programmer’s Reference Published by Wiley Publishing, Inc. 10475 Crosspoint Boulevard Indianapolis, IN 46256 www.wiley.com Copyright © 2005 by Wiley Publishing, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana Published simultaneously in Canada ISBN: 0-7645-7996-7 Manufactured in the United States of America 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1MA/ST/QS/QV/IN No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except as permitted under Sections 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the Legal Department, Wiley Publishing, Inc., 10475 Crosspoint Blvd., Indianapolis, IN 46256, (317) 572-3447, fax (317) 572-4355, e-mail: [email protected]. LIMIT OF LIABILITY/DISCLAIMER OF WARRANTY: THE PUBLISHER AND THE AUTHOR MAKE NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE ACCURACY OR COM- PLETENESS OF THE CONTENTS OF THIS WORK AND SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIM ALL WAR- RANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION WARRANTIES OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. -
Scripting: Higher- Level Programming for the 21St Century
. John K. Ousterhout Sun Microsystems Laboratories Scripting: Higher- Cybersquare Level Programming for the 21st Century Increases in computer speed and changes in the application mix are making scripting languages more and more important for the applications of the future. Scripting languages differ from system programming languages in that they are designed for “gluing” applications together. They use typeless approaches to achieve a higher level of programming and more rapid application development than system programming languages. or the past 15 years, a fundamental change has been ated with system programming languages and glued Foccurring in the way people write computer programs. together with scripting languages. However, several The change is a transition from system programming recent trends, such as faster machines, better script- languages such as C or C++ to scripting languages such ing languages, the increasing importance of graphical as Perl or Tcl. Although many people are participat- user interfaces (GUIs) and component architectures, ing in the change, few realize that the change is occur- and the growth of the Internet, have greatly expanded ring and even fewer know why it is happening. This the applicability of scripting languages. These trends article explains why scripting languages will handle will continue over the next decade, with more and many of the programming tasks in the next century more new applications written entirely in scripting better than system programming languages. languages and system programming -
10 Programming Languages You Should Learn Right Now by Deborah Rothberg September 15, 2006 8 Comments Posted Add Your Opinion
10 Programming Languages You Should Learn Right Now By Deborah Rothberg September 15, 2006 8 comments posted Add your opinion Knowing a handful of programming languages is seen by many as a harbor in a job market storm, solid skills that will be marketable as long as the languages are. Yet, there is beauty in numbers. While there may be developers who have had riches heaped on them by knowing the right programming language at the right time in the right place, most longtime coders will tell you that periodically learning a new language is an essential part of being a good and successful Web developer. "One of my mentors once told me that a programming language is just a programming language. It doesn't matter if you're a good programmer, it's the syntax that matters," Tim Huckaby, CEO of San Diego-based software engineering company CEO Interknowlogy.com, told eWEEK. However, Huckaby said that while his company is "swimmi ng" in work, he's having a nearly impossible time finding recruits, even on the entry level, that know specific programming languages. "We're hiring like crazy, but we're not having an easy time. We're just looking for attitude and aptitude, kids right out of school that know .Net, or even Java, because with that we can train them on .Net," said Huckaby. "Don't get fixated on one or two languages. When I started in 1969, FORTRAN, COBOL and S/360 Assembler were the big tickets. Today, Java, C and Visual Basic are. In 10 years time, some new set of languages will be the 'in thing.' …At last count, I knew/have learned over 24 different languages in over 30 years," Wayne Duqaine, director of Software Development at Grandview Systems, of Sebastopol, Calif., told eWEEK. -
The Document Foundation and Libreoffice Presentation
Liberating Open Office development Or – How we will fix your office suite Michael Meeks [email protected] “Stand at the crossroads and look; ask for the ancient paths, ask where the good way is, and walk in it, and you will find rest for your souls...” - Jeremiah 6:16 1 Overview & disclaimer ... I am not speaking for the Document Foundation These views are mine, but you're welcome to borrow them. LibreOffice is better, and fun too How is it going ? What are we doing ? Progress so far Release process Check the license applies to everyone LibreOffice appreciates your help and/or ways to get involved Conclusions 2 What / Why of LibreOffice 3 4 5 What is LibreOffice / The Document Foundation Finally “doing it right” vendor neutral, no code ownership aggregation a real Free Software / hackers project Volunteers + RedHat + Novell + Debian + Canonical + Google … FSF + OSI support, boycott + Novell support etc. Freedesktop hosting LGPLv3+ / MPL for new code ... An idea – whose time has finally come … a beautiful, Office suite we can be proud of (in due course) backed by a real, open community Shipping now on Windows, Mac, GNU / Linux, *BSD etc. ODF enables trivial migration with your data ... 6 11 months in: how is it going ? - extremely well 205+ entirely new code contributors with included patches 200+ active translators, for ~100 languages (in Pootle) Two stable branches: 3.3.3 and 3.4.2 – 7 stable releases in 10 months Development continues apace: 3.5.0 due early Feb 2012 140 120 Tata C.S. SUSE 100 s r SIL o t Redhat u b Oracle i 80 -
Safe, Fast and Easy: Towards Scalable Scripting Languages
Safe, Fast and Easy: Towards Scalable Scripting Languages by Pottayil Harisanker Menon A dissertation submitted to The Johns Hopkins University in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Baltimore, Maryland Feb, 2017 ⃝c Pottayil Harisanker Menon 2017 All rights reserved Abstract Scripting languages are immensely popular in many domains. They are char- acterized by a number of features that make it easy to develop small applications quickly - flexible data structures, simple syntax and intuitive semantics. However they are less attractive at scale: scripting languages are harder to debug, difficult to refactor and suffers performance penalties. Many research projects have tackled the issue of safety and performance for existing scripting languages with mixed results: the considerable flexibility offered by their semantics also makes them significantly harder to analyze and optimize. Previous research from our lab has led to the design of a typed scripting language built specifically to be flexible without losing static analyzability. Inthis dissertation, we present a framework to exploit this analyzability, with the aim of producing a more efficient implementation Our approach centers around the concept of adaptive tags: specialized tags attached to values that represent how it is used in the current program. Our frame- work abstractly tracks the flow of deep structural types in the program, and thuscan ii ABSTRACT efficiently tag them at runtime. Adaptive tags allow us to tackle key issuesatthe heart of performance problems of scripting languages: the framework is capable of performing efficient dispatch in the presence of flexible structures. iii Acknowledgments At the very outset, I would like to express my gratitude and appreciation to my advisor Prof. -
Complementary Slides for the Evolution of Programming Languages
The Evolution of Programming Languages In Text: Chapter 2 Programming Language Genealogy 2 Zuse’s Plankalkül • Designed in 1945, but not published until 1972 • Never implemented • Advanced data structures – floating point, arrays, records • Invariants 3 Plankalkül Syntax • An assignment statement to assign the expression A[4] + 1 to A[5] | A + 1 => A V | 4 5 (subscripts) S | 1.n 1.n (data types) 4 Minimal Hardware Programming: Pseudocodes • Pseudocodes were developed and used in the late 1940s and early 1950s • What was wrong with using machine code? – Poor readability – Poor modifiability – Expression coding was tedious – Machine deficiencies--no indexing or floating point 5 Machine Code • Any binary instruction which the computer’s CPU will read and execute – e.g., 10001000 01010111 11000101 11110001 10100001 00010101 • Each instruction performs a very specific task, such as loading a value into a register, or adding two binary numbers together 6 Short Code: The First Pseudocode • Short Code developed by Mauchly in 1949 for BINAC computers – Expressions were coded, left to right – Example of operations: 01 – 06 abs value 1n (n+2)nd power 02 ) 07 + 2n (n+2)nd root 03 = 08 pause 4n if <= n 04 / 09 ( 58 print and tab 7 • Variables were named with byte-pair codes – E.g., X0 = SQRT(ABS(Y0)) – 00 X0 03 20 06 Y0 – 00 was used as padding to fill the word 8 IBM 704 and Fortran • Fortran 0: 1954 - not implemented • Fortran I: 1957 – Designed for the new IBM 704, which had index registers and floating point hardware • This led to the idea of compiled -
Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software
EKONOMI OCH SAMHÄLLE ECONOMICS AND SOCIETY LINUS NYMAN – UNDERSTANDING CODE FORKING IN OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE SOURCE OPEN IN FORKING CODE UNDERSTANDING – NYMAN LINUS UNDERSTANDING CODE FORKING IN OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE AN EXAMINATION OF CODE FORKING, ITS EFFECT ON OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE, AND HOW IT IS VIEWED AND PRACTICED BY DEVELOPERS LINUS NYMAN Ekonomi och samhälle Economics and Society Skrifter utgivna vid Svenska handelshögskolan Publications of the Hanken School of Economics Nr 287 Linus Nyman Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers Helsinki 2015 < Understanding Code Forking in Open Source Software: An examination of code forking, its effect on open source software, and how it is viewed and practiced by developers Key words: Code forking, fork, open source software, free software © Hanken School of Economics & Linus Nyman, 2015 Linus Nyman Hanken School of Economics Information Systems Science, Department of Management and Organisation P.O.Box 479, 00101 Helsinki, Finland Hanken School of Economics ISBN 978-952-232-274-6 (printed) ISBN 978-952-232-275-3 (PDF) ISSN-L 0424-7256 ISSN 0424-7256 (printed) ISSN 2242-699X (PDF) Edita Prima Ltd, Helsinki 2015 i ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who either helped make this book possible, or at the very least much more enjoyable to write. Firstly I would like to thank my pre-examiners Imed Hammouda and Björn Lundell for their insightful suggestions and remarks. Furthermore, I am grateful to Imed for also serving as my opponent. I would also like to express my sincere gratitude to Liikesivistysrahasto, the Hanken Foundation, the Wallenberg Foundation, and the Finnish Unix User Group. -
Feasibility Study: Migrating from Microsoft Office to Libreoffice in An
Feasibility Study: Migrating from Microsoft Office to LibreOffice in an Academic Enterprise Environment By: Curran Hamilton, David Hersh, Jacqueline McPherson, Tyler Mobray Humboldt State University May 4th, 2012 Abstract This study investigates the feasibility of a migration from Microsoft Office to an alternative office suite at Humboldt State University. After investigating the market for viable alternatives, it was determined that only the open source LibreOffice might be mature enough to meet the needs of a complex enterprise. A literature search was done to learn more about the suite and its development community. Use cases were drawn up and test cases were derived from them in order to compare the functionality of LibreOffice with that of Microsoft Office. It was concluded that LibreOffice is a rapidly maturing and promising suite that may be a viable replacement in one to two years, but is not an acceptable alternative to Microsoft Office in the enterprise environment today. 1 1. Introduction Due to continually increasing costs associated with the CSU’s contract with Microsoft for its many products, including the Office suite, Humboldt State University decided to look into other office suites (preferably open source) that can perform acceptably in place of Microsoft Office (MS Office). The Information Technology Services (ITS) department hired a team of four interns (Curran Hamilton, David Hersh, Jacqueline McPherson, and Tyler Mobray) to determine if a successful migration away from MS Office was feasible enough to warrant further research. We explored other office products currently available, decided on candidate suites, and tested the candidates. Finally, we analyzed and reported on our findings. -
Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell
JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE FAMILY GODIVA SCALA PROCESSING ASPECTJ GROOVY JAVAFX SCRIPT EINSTEIN J SHARP JUDOSCRIPT JASMIN BEANSHELL PDF-33JPLFGSPAGJSEJSJJB16 | Page: 133 File Size 5,909 KB | 10 Oct, 2020 PDF File: Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script 1/3 Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell - PDF-33JPLFGSPAGJSEJSJJB16 TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction Brief Description Main Topic Technical Note Appendix Glossary PDF File: Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script 2/3 Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell - PDF-33JPLFGSPAGJSEJSJJB16 Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell e-Book Name : Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell - Read Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell PDF on your Android, iPhone, iPad or PC directly, the following PDF file is submitted in 10 Oct, 2020, Ebook ID PDF-33JPLFGSPAGJSEJSJJB16. Download full version PDF for Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell using the link below: Download: JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE FAMILY GODIVA SCALA PROCESSING ASPECTJ GROOVY JAVAFX SCRIPT EINSTEIN J SHARP JUDOSCRIPT JASMIN BEANSHELL PDF The writers of Java Programming Language Family Godiva Scala Processing Aspectj Groovy Javafx Script Einstein J Sharp Judoscript Jasmin Beanshell have made all reasonable attempts to offer latest and precise information and facts for the readers of this publication. The creators will not be held accountable for any unintentional flaws or omissions that may be found. -
Can Libreoffice and Apache Openoffice Be Alternatives to MS-Office from Consumer's Perspective?
2016 2 nd International Conference on Social, Education and Management Engineering (SEME 2016) ISBN: 978-1-60595-336-6 "Make It Possible" Study: Can LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice Be Alternatives to MS-Office from Consumer's Perspective? Jun IIO 1,* and Shusaku OHGAMA 2 1Socio-informatics Dept. Faculty of Letters, Chuo University, 742-1 Higashinakano, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, Japan 2Information Technology Dept. Information Systems Div., Sumitomo Electric Industries, Ltd., 4-5-33 Kitahama, Chuo-ku, Osaka-shi, Osaka, Japan *Corresponding author Keywords: Open-source software, LibreOffice, OpenOffice, Productivity suites. Abstract. There are many guidebooks which offer some instruction of using productivity suites, and most of them focus on Microsoft's Office (MS-Office,) because it is the dominant products in the market. However, we have some other productivity suites, such as LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice, as the alternative of MS-Office. Therefore, we investigated whether such software could be used properly, within the content of the guidebooks which are widely used. In this paper, the results of our investigation show that the interoperability of such software has already reached a tolerable level from a practical perspective. Introduction Recently, we can find in bookstores many books for reference that provide guidelines on how to operate productivity suites. However, most of them only focus on Microsoft's Office suites (MS-Office,) because it has the largest market share in the world in the productivity software market. On the other hand, there are some other options, such as LibreOffice and Apache OpenOffice. In recent days, persons in businesses face some problems in using these productivity suites.