Louis I. Kahn's Reading of Volume Zero Stanford Anderson
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Public Institutions: Louis I. Kahn's Reading of Volume Zero Stanford Anderson Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), Vol. 49, No. 1. (Sep., 1995), pp. 10-21. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1046-4883%28199509%2949%3A1%3C10%3APILIKR%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N Journal of Architectural Education (1984-) is currently published by Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture, Inc.. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/acsa.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is an independent not-for-profit organization dedicated to and preserving a digital archive of scholarly journals. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Wed May 16 23:15:41 2007 Public Institutions: Louis I. Kahn's Reading of Volume Zero STANFORDANDERSON, Massachusetts Institute of Technology In the work of architects like Louis I. Kahn or Volume Zero as a Temporal Concept but I never read anything but the first vol- Frank Lloyd Wright, we discover imagination and ume. Even at that, I only read the first three profound understanding not only of architecture, but also of the societal forces that enable and Louis Kahn frequently revealed his concern or four chapters. My purpose is to read Vol- employ architecture. Such imagination and for institutions. He sought to understand ume Zero, which has yet not been written. understanding require critical, reflective, and what it is that people within a given com- That's a kind of strange mind which causes imaginative minds-fueled by criticism of our present condition and hypotheses of what is best munity share. His search was not primarily one to look for this kind of thing. From and most sustaining in our experience. Difficult for physical, built institutions, but rather for such a realization, one thinks of the emer- as such an enterprise is, we have a right to what underlies or motivates these associa- gence of a mind. The first feeling is that of expect this ambition in architects, particularly when they are entrusted to shape our civic and tions. His intuitions or reconstructions of beauty. Not the beautiful, just beauty. It is public realm. institutions were characteristically immate- the aura of the perfect harmony."' rial, abstract, formal. He sought- to under- "Not the beautiful, just beauty," stand the patterns of human association and Kahn says. Rejecting an idealist position their reasons for being. Only then could an (the beautiful), Kahn attends to what is architect build properly-whether the great given (just beauty). Yet he also says, "It is institutions of a society or the more humble the aura of the perfect harmony." In the institutions of house or street. end, Kahn knows what isgiuen to our senses This paper came into being in re- as the evocation of something more. Kahn sponse to two events recognizing major walks a tightrope, seeking "the aura of the public institutions. It emerged in a confer- perfect harmony." ence at the Massachusetts Institute of Tech- For now, I am specifically interested nology that examined Kahn's own National in Kahn's attention to English history. Capitol Complex in Dacca, Bangladesh What is this strange mind of Louis Kahn, (1962-1982). Late in 1992, the article was and what is it searching for? Eighteen further developed in a conference on public months later, Kahn returned to the same buildings, held on the occasion of the dedi- theme and gave us more clues: "Then I cation of the new Supreme Court in Jerusa- thought, What would be a harking back, lem, designed by Ada and Ram Karmi. The startingfiom the beginning?. I'm particu- organizers of the Jerusalem seminar set forth larly interested in English history, which h- two themes that they considered problem- cinates me. Though it's a bloody history, it atic in the creation of major institutions: still has this quality of a search. However, "the form and language of the contempo- every time I start to read Volume I, I linger rary public building and its obligation to on Chapter One, and I re-read it and re- express the quality and identity of public in- read it and always feel something else in it. 1. Janus sculpture, Roman, Vatican Museums. (From Of course my idea is probably to read Vol- Taidehistoriallisia Tutkimuksia Konsthistoriska Shrdier 4 stitutions." [19781:102.) I propose that Louis Kahn addressed ume Zero, . just to peer into this terrific these issues well in both concept and pro- thing-man, who has this great capacity for duction. The National Capitol Complex in putting things into being that nature cannot Dacca documents Kahn's exceptional built put into being."' work in this realm. However, I would argue Kahn's search, his harking back, is the that Kahn characteristically established his search for a beginning-a beginning not in architectural position through a more ab- nature, but for that which man puts into stract search. I propose that Kahn addressed being and nature cannot. It is a search for these issues through a reading of history and the archaic, for the prehistoric, as the num- law-in his case, English history and law: "I ber on his impossible book, Volume Zero, Journal ofArchitectura1Education, pp. 10-2 1 like English history. I have volumes of it, reveals. The search for the prehistoric is not O 1995 ACSA, Inc. September 1995 JA€ 49/1 10 3. Louis I. Kahn, travel sketch of the Acropolis. Athens, 1951. (R. Wurman and E. Feldman, eds., Notebooks and Drawings of Louis I. Kahn [Cambr'idge, MA: MIT Press, 19731, plate 18.) 2. Paestum. Basilica. (Photograph by Serge Moulinier. From Elizabeth Ayrton. The Doric Temple) London: Thames & Hudson, 19611, p. 17.) implausible. That is what anthropologists sought, at least until recently. It was and still remains what archaeologists seek in the physical remains of ancient sites. One might imagine an architect, an architect with Louis Kahn's turn of mind, to be particularly in- terested to pursue his search among the physical, often architectural, remains of ar- chaic societies. And, of course Kahn did; he preferred Paestum to the Parthenon (Figure 2).3In a drawing of the Acropolis, Kahn gave a curious attention to what is non- canonical (Figure 3). Or again, there is his attention to still more archaic ancient sites (Figure 4). Nonetheless, in the passages quoted, Kahn speaks of the books he collected and of his renewed searches for the archaic by turning to modern texts, to history. Why English history? Why should this Jewish man, who emigrated from Estonia to America as a boy, direct his attention to - England? From the second quotation, we learn that this reference is more than inci- 4. Kahn, travel sketch of the hypostyle hall. Kalmak. 1951. (Wurman and Feldman. eds dental: He tells us that he is particularly in- Notebooks and Drawings, plate 10.) terested in English history; it fascinates him. 1 1 Anderson Then he offers a reason: "Though it's a ductive structure. Roman law and Catholic there is an earlier, original form to which bloody history, it still has this quality of a canon law are codified. Such law presides appeal can be made, this may well be a fun- search." The search is now not only Kahn's over historical change. Codified law is given, damentalist revolt. To continue from search for beginnings; he reads English his- not searched-searched neither backward Pocock: Wherever it [the original form of tory as itself a search. This must also be a nor forward. The English conception of that the law] survives, or even can be imagined, search extended in time, a search that is also moment is, however, very like the moment there is the possibility of a fundamentalist directed forward. we are entertaining in Kahn's thought: a Ja- revolt, a demand for return to the original Janus-like, Kahn's search for begin- nus-like construction in which we look back sources. Such revolts, at once radical and nings is not merely antiquarian nor merely through the succession of events to a time reactionary, involve the repudiation of tra- the identification of sources for imitation, immemorial in order that we may confirm dition; they raise the problems of how the but rather the search for an impulse that may an ancient, unwritten constitution and thus original form of authority may be known, still inform us today. But again, why English affirm the customs and institutions that also and what relation (other than traditional) it history? I suggest two reasons, one quite or- must be adapted as one meets the contingen- may bear to the present [emphasis added].5 dinary and the other more profound, that cies of the present and future. There is the Yet, at least in this passage, I think stem from Kahn's own claim that English English sense of law, custom, and institu- Pocock fails to emphasize the difference be- history has the quality of a search. The ordi- tion, which relies on ancient, but constantly tween (1) a fundamentalist revolt that relies nary is this: Though an immigrant boy from renewed, agreement rather than rule-reli- on the survival of what is taken to be the another culture, Kahn grew up and worked ance on agreement whether we search back- original form of the law and (2) a fundamen- in a society with English roots.