Origin and Significance of the Mauch Chunk Shale*

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Origin and Significance of the Mauch Chunk Shale* BULLETIN OF THE GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA VOL. 18, PP. 449-476, PLS. 49-52 DECEMBER 17, 1907 ORIGIN AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE MAUCH CHUNK SHALE* BY JOSEPH BAURELL (Presented in abstract before the Society December 26, 1906) CONTENTS Page Part I. Observations bearing on the problems of origin................................. 449 Introduction .......................................................................................... 449 General description of the Mauch Chunk formation................ 450 The Mauch Chunk of the anthracite coal basins......................... 453 Stratigraphie characters ........................................................... 453 Inorganic evidences of subaerial exposure........................... 456 Organic evidences of subaerial exposure............................... 460 Part II. Inferred conditions of origin.................................................................... 462 Previous opinions ................................................................................462 Inferences as to geographic conditions of origin....................... 463 Floodplain origin of the Mauch Chunk................................. 463 Relations of land and sea.......................................................... 463 Relations of the delta plain to regions of erosion.............. 468 Character of the delta surface..................................................468 Inferences as to climatic conditions................................................ 469 Introductory statement ............................................................. 469 Chemical and structural evidences as to climate.............. 469 Organic evidences as to climate................................................ 472 Conclusions and comparisons.................................................... 474 P a r t I. Observations bearing on th e Problems of Origin INTRODUCTION A discussion of the nature of geographic and climatic control of sedi­ mentation has been previously made by the writer in order that the origin of certain specific formations might be dealt with, and the present paper on the interpretation of the Mauch Chunk follows these previous articles in logical sequence, f * Manuscript received by Secretary of the Society from Censor October 28, 1907. f Relative geological importance of continental, littoral, and marine sedimentation. Journal of Geology, vol. xiv, 1906, pp. 316-356, 430-457, 524-568. Relations between climate and terrestrial deposits. Presented before the Geol. Soc. Am. December 26, 1906. Printed in abstract in the Proc. Geol. Soc. Am. XXXIX—Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., Vol. 18, 1906 (449) Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/18/1/449/3412352/BUL18-0449.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 4 5 0 J . BARRELL----ORIGIN OP THE MAUCH CHUNK SHALE The first part of the present paper consists of a presentation of the significant facts of the Mauch Chunk shales, gathered both from the literature and from personal observation. The second part deals with the interpretation of these facts. Where a new view is to be proved the observational and inferential portions should be strictly separated, but at the same time the purpose for which the facts are presented should be evident when they are given. It is therefore desirable to state in advance the conclusion finally reached, which is that in the anthracite region, more surely in the southeastern and eastern portions, the whole forma­ tion, from top to bottom, was a subaerial delta deposit laid down under a semiarid climate. Besides merely the essential facts, there are included in the descriptive portion many details which are not used in drawing the conclusions, but which, if the hypothesis of terrestrial deposition be accepted, are interest­ ing as showing in a definite case what the minor characteristics of such a formation may be. They are doubtless also valuable as indicating specific features of climate or geography, even though their significance may not at present be understood. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE MAUCH CHUNK FORMATION The Mauch Chunk shale is the name of a strongly individualized for­ mation of the Lower Carboniferous of Pennsylvania, chiefly consisting, in the region of its typical development, of alternating red shales and red sandstones, the ratio of the two varying through different horizons of the formation and in different districts. Not a little of the distinctive character of the Mauch Chunk is due to its sharp contrast with the preceding and succeeding formations. The inferior, the Pocono sandstone, consists of a great thickness of grayish green to light gray, cross-bedded sandstones, the whole weathering white and constituting a massive and resistant formation, topographically prominent wherever it occurs. Above the Mauch Chunk lies the Potts- ville conglomerate, interstratified with gray sandstones. The Pottsville, like the Pocono, is a resistant formation and one to whose protecting rim many of the smaller synclinal coal basins owe the preservation of their coal during the Tertiary cycle of erosion. In contrast with these adjacent formations the Mauch Chunk as a whole is weak and conse­ quently readily reduced to local base level. It yields a red loamy soil, and where the formation is thickest, as around the southern and middle anthracite coal basins, gives rise to comparatively level and broadly open valleys. These are utilized for agriculture, and the checker-work of fields contrasts strikingly with the forest-covered and level-topped slopes Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/18/1/449/3412352/BUL18-0449.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OP THE MAUCH CHUNK FORMATION 451 which rise on each side to a height in the neighborhood of a thousand feet. The broader characters and relations of the Mauch Chunk shales of Pennsylvania and the synchronous deposits of other portions of the Ap­ palachian basin have been recently so admirably summed up by J. J. Stevenson* from the previous studies of himself and others that only sufficient need be here outlined to bring the chief features to mind. The formation in question was laid down with a character, thickness, and distribution much more variable than that of the underlying Pocono. Its maximum development occurs in the anthracite coal regions and it there possesses its typical character. Beyond the limits of the state of Pennsylvania the equivalent formations are so different that other names must be applied. In eastern Ohio the strata pass into the upper part of the Waverly group, while to the southwest in Maryland and Virginia the Greenbrier limestone occupies the horizon of the lower portion of the shales. In contrast to the considerable thickness to the south, the shales are thin along all the northern outcrops in Pennsylvania and often missing from between the Pocono below and the Pottsville above. The Mauch Chunk reaches its greatest thickness in the region of the southern anthracite coal field, according to Rogers measuring at least 3,000 feet at Pottsville. At Mauch Chunk, Winslow gives figures of 2,168 feet on the south side of the syncline and 3,342 on the north. From these maximum thicknesses it diminishes northward to 1,000 feet at Solomons gap, near Wilkes Barre, and 150 feet of green shales and flaggy sandstones at Pittston. Passing westward from Pottsville, first to the Broad Top coal field, Ashburner and Billin give it a thickness of 1,100 feet, divided into: 1, Upper shales and sandstones, 910 feet; 2, Mountain (Greenbrier) limestone, 49 feet; 3, Lower shales and sand­ stones, 141 feet.f Northwest of the Broad Top field and back of the Alleghany Mountain front the thickness is given by Butts, in the Ebens- burg, Pennsylvania, folio, as but 180 feet, of which the lower 80 feet consist of thick bedded gray to greenish sandstone, corresponding per­ haps to the Greenbrier limestone, and underlaid by 5 to 6 feet of inter­ bedded red shale and sandstone. At the most southwestern outcrop in Pennsylvania, that of Laurel ridge (Masontown-Uniontown quadrangle), M. R. Campbell gives the entire thickness as 250 feet, consisting of three members. At the base are 50 feet of typical Mauch Chunk red shale, followed by 30 feet of Gieenbrier limestone, which is in turn succeeded by 170 feet of red and green shales, with occasional beds of greenish sandstone. * Lower Carboniferous of the Appalachian basin. Bull. Geol. Soc. Am., vol. 14, 1902, pp. 16-96. t Second Geological Survey of Pennsylvania. Summary, final report, vol. 3, part 1, p. 1833. Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/gsa/gsabulletin/article-pdf/18/1/449/3412352/BUL18-0449.pdf by guest on 28 September 2021 452 J. BARBELL---- ORIGIN OP THE MAUCH CHUNK SHALE It is seen from these details that the edge of the great Greenbrier limestone of Virginia and farther west reaches into southwestern Penn­ sylvania only, thinning away to a knife-edge, and its place being appar­ ently taken near its margin by thick bedded gray to greenish sandstones, noted as 80 feet thick in the Ebensburg folio. Recent observations tend to show that over the western half of Penn­ sylvania, as well as over the states of the central west, uplift and erosion intervened to a greater or less extent between the latest deposits of the Mississippian period and the earliest of the Pennsylvania,* the adjacent formations being sharply distinct and different members of the Mauch Chunk or equivalent formations coming into contact with the Pottsville sandstone. The scantiness
Recommended publications
  • The La Coulee Formation, a New Post-Acadian Continental Clastic Unit Bearing Groundwater Calcretes, Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec
    Document generated on 09/23/2021 3:19 p.m. Atlantic Geology The La Coulee Formation, a new post-Acadian continental clastic unit bearing groundwater calcretes, Gaspe Peninsula, Quebec Pierre Jutras, Gilbert Prichonnet and Peter H. von Bitter Volume 35, Number 2, 1999 Article abstract A I km2 erosional remnant of the La Coulee Formation, a previously URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/ageo35_2art03 unrecognized stratigraphic unit, has been studied in the Perce area of the Gaspd Peninsula. It unconformably overlies folded Cambrian to Devonian See table of contents rocks and is unconformably overlain by the mid-Carboniferous Bonaventure Fonnation. The erosional remnant includes the lowest 60 m of this newly identified formation of unknown thickness. Original sedimentary fades are Publisher(s) limited to 50 m of breccia debris flows passing stratigraphically upward into 10m of conglomeratic debris flows. Groundwater calcrete formation has Atlantic Geoscience Society partially or completely transformed the lowest 30 m of the sequence. The depositional environment is interpreted as being related to a proximal ISSN continental alluvial fan. The nearby presence of a saline body of water is inferred to account for thick and massive groundwater calcrete formation and 0843-5561 (print) water-saturated debris flows in a relatively arid climatic context Most of the 1718-7885 (digital) formation was eroded prior to deposition of the Bonaventure Formation. However, the basal groundwater calcretes were more widely preserved. They Explore this journal underlie the Bonaventure Formation in most of the Perce1 area and in the Saint-Elzear area, close to a hundred kilometres to the southwest. Post-sedimentary faulting has affected both the La Coulee and Bonaventure Cite this article formations.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Cross Section C–C' Through the Appalachian Basin from Erie
    Geologic Cross Section C–C’ Through the Appalachian Basin From Erie County, North-Central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge Province, Bedford County, South-Central Pennsylvania By Robert T. Ryder, Michael H. Trippi, Christopher S. Swezey, Robert D. Crangle, Jr., Rebecca S. Hope, Elisabeth L. Rowan, and Erika E. Lentz Scientific Investigations Map 3172 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Ryder, R.T., Trippi, M.H., Swezey, C.S. Crangle, R.D., Jr., Hope, R.S., Rowan, E.L., and Lentz, E.E., 2012, Geologic cross section C–C’ through the Appalachian basin from Erie County, north-central Ohio, to the Valley and Ridge province, Bedford County, south-central Pennsylvania: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 3172, 2 sheets, 70-p.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf/13/6/2206/3990899/2206.Pdf 2206 by Guest on 23 September 2021 Research Paper
    Research Paper GEOSPHERE Detrital zircons and sediment dispersal in the Appalachian foreland GEOSPHERE; v. 13, no. 6 William A. Thomas1, George E. Gehrels2, Stephen F. Greb3, Gregory C. Nadon4, Aaron M. Satkoski5, and Mariah C. Romero6 1Emeritus, University of Kentucky, and Geological Survey of Alabama, P. O. Box 869999, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35486-6999, USA doi:10.1130/GES01525.1 2Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA 3Kentucky Geological Survey, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky 40506-0107, USA 4 12 figures; 3 supplemental files Department of Geological Sciences, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio 45701-2979, USA 5Department of Geoscience, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706-1692, USA 6Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907, USA CORRESPONDENCE: geowat@uky .edu CITATION: Thomas, W.A., Gehrels, G.E., Greb, S.F., Nadon, G.C., Satkoski, A.M., and Romero, M.C., 2017, Detrital zircons and sediment dispersal in the Appala­ ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION chian foreland: Geosphere, v. 13, no. 6, p. 2206–2230, doi:10.1130/GES01525.1. Seven new detrital-zircon U-Pb age analyses along with a compilation The late Paleozoic Appalachian orogen along eastern North America (Fig. 1) of previously published data from Mississippian–Permian sandstones in the long has been recognized as the dominant source of clastic sediment spread- Received 6 March 2017 Appalachian foreland (total n = 3564) define the provenance of Alleghanian ing cratonward into orogenic foreland basins (e.g., King, 1959; Thomas, 1977) Revision received 10 July 2017 Accepted 27 September 2017 synorogenic clastic wedges, as well as characterize the detritus available to and beyond, into intracratonic basins and farther across the North American Published online 19 October 2017 any more extensive intracontinental dispersal systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Geology of the Transylvania Fault Zone in Bedford County, Pennsylvania
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge University of Kentucky Master's Theses Graduate School 2009 STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Elizabeth Lauren Dodson University of Kentucky, [email protected] Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Dodson, Elizabeth Lauren, "STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA" (2009). University of Kentucky Master's Theses. 621. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/gradschool_theses/621 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Kentucky Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ABSTRACT OF THESIS STRUCTURAL GEOLOGY OF THE TRANSYLVANIA FAULT ZONE IN BEDFORD COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Transverse zones cross strike of thrust-belt structures as large-scale alignments of cross-strike structures. The Transylvania fault zone is a set of discontinuous right-lateral transverse faults striking at about 270º across Appalachian thrust-belt structures along 40º N latitude in Pennsylvania. Near Everett, Pennsylvania, the Breezewood fault terminates with the Ashcom thrust fault. The Everett Gap fault terminates westward with the Hartley thrust fault. Farther west, the Bedford fault extends westward to terminate against the Wills Mountain thrust fault. The rocks, deformed during the Alleghanian orogeny, are semi-independently deformed on opposite sides of the transverse fault, indicating fault movement during folding and thrusting. Palinspastic restorations of cross sections on either side of the fault zone are used to compare transverse fault displacement.
    [Show full text]
  • Application of Foreland Basin Detrital-Zircon Geochronology to the Reconstruction of the Southern and Central Appalachian Orogen
    JG vol. 118, no. 1 2010 Tuesday Oct 27 2009 01:03 PM/80097/MILLERD CHECKED Application of Foreland Basin Detrital-Zircon Geochronology to the Reconstruction of the Southern and Central Appalachian Orogen Hyunmee Park, David L. Barbeau Jr., Alan Rickenbaker, Denise Bachmann-Krug, and George Gehrels1 Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, U.S.A. (e-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT q1 We report the U-Pb age distribution of detrital zircons collected from central and southern Appalachian foreland basin strata, which record changes of sediment provenance in response to the different phases of the Appalachian orogeny. Taconic clastic wedges have predominantly ∼1080–1180- and ∼1300–1500-Ma zircons, whereas Acadian clastic wedges contain abundant Paleozoic zircons and minor populations of 550–700- and 1900–2200-Ma zircons q2 consistent with a Gondwanan affinity. Alleghanian clastic wedges contain large populations of ∼980–1080-Ma, ∼2700- Ma, and older Archean zircons and fewer Paleozoic zircons than occur in the Acadian clastic wedges. The abundance of Paleozoic detrital zircons in Acadian clastic wedges indicates that the Acadian hinterland consisted of recycled material and possible exposure of Taconic-aged plutons, which provided significant detritus to the Acadian foreland basin. The appearance of Pan-African/Brasiliano- and Eburnean/Trans-Amazonian-aged zircons in Acadian clastic wedges suggests a Devonian accretion of the Carolina terrane. In contrast, the relative decrease in abundance of Paleozoic detrital zircons coupled with an increase of Archean and Grenville zircons in Alleghanian clastic wedges indicates the development of an orogenic hinterland consisting of deformed passive margin strata and Grenville basement.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Hypothesis for Devonian Tetrapod Evolution Author(S): Gregory J
    Woodland Hypothesis for Devonian Tetrapod Evolution Author(s): Gregory J. Retallack Source: The Journal of Geology, Vol. 119, No. 3 (May 2011), pp. 235-258 Published by: The University of Chicago Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/659144 . Accessed: 22/05/2011 20:08 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at . http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=ucpress. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Geology. http://www.jstor.org ARTICLES Woodland Hypothesis for Devonian Tetrapod Evolution Gregory J.
    [Show full text]
  • Pander Society Newsletter
    Pander Society Newsletter Compiled and edited by P.H. von Bitter and J. Burke DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL HISTORY (PALAEOBIOLOGY SECTION), ROYAL ONTARIO MUSEUM, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M5S 2C6 Number 38 June 2006 www.conodont.net CHIEF PANDERER’S REMARKS Dear Conodont Colleagues: A year has gone by since I last communicated like this, and I’m pleased (and relieved) that another Pander Society Newsletter is ready to ‘go’. Thank you for having sent in your reports and questionnaires; without your willingness to going through a bit of pain there would be no Pander Society Newsletter, and our communications would be the poorer. I am very grateful to compiler and editor Joan Burke (Toronto) and webmaster Mark Purnell (Leicester) for their dedication and ongoing interest; they have helped me greatly and continue to make me look better than I really am, particularly in a time of personal and professional transition. You, the Pander Society membership, continue to ‘re-invent’ and apply conodonts in startling new ways. Some of this re-invention was seen at the Pander Society Symposium in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, where on March 20-22, 2006 our (mostly) North American members focused on Conodonts & Sequence Stratigraphy. Looking ahead, the programme of ICOS 2006 on July 12-30/ 2006 in Leicester, England, promises not only to surprise and delight, but looks remarkably diverse and imaginative. Christian Pander, would, on the 150th anniversary of the publication of his major conodont study, no doubt be enormously impressed and pleased with the innovativeness and progress of his intellectual grandchildren. My best wishes to all of you.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment B
    Attachment B TRANSECT AND BOREHOLE DESCRIPTIONS AND LOCATION MAPS Seismic-Reflection, Electrical-Resistivity-Imaging, and Calibration-Borehole Data-Acquisition and Analysis Services Broad Top Coalfield, Bedford, Fulton, and Huntingdon Counties, South-Central Pennsylvania Bureau of Geological Survey Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources 2019 Note: This attachment contains site descriptions and location maps for five (5) proposed transects (traverse lines), covering commercial seismic-reflection data, a seismic-reflection survey, and an electrical-resistivity-imaging survey, and for one (1) proposed calibration air-rotary borehole, situated in the Broad Top coalfield and vicinity, Bedford, Fulton, and Huntingdon Counties, south-central Pennsylvania. To assist prospective bidders in understanding the bedrock geology and field conditions to be encountered, descriptions of the likely geologic formations and rock types to be found cropping out and in the shallow subsurface (i.e., upper thousand feet) are included. The descriptions (assessments) are a reasonable attempt by the Department to provide objective geologic information about the work sites. As such, they should be considered average probable conditions and should not be considered guarantees. General Description of Geologic Units Underlying the proposed work sites are one or more of the following bedrock geologic units, including, from oldest to youngest, the Upper Devonian and Mississippian Rockwell Formation; the Mississippian Burgoon Sandstone and Mauch Chunk Formation; and the Pennsylvanian Pottsville, Allegheny, and Glenshaw Formations. The Rockwell Formation consists of buff, fine- to medium-grained, crossbedded, argillaceous sandstone, and includes some carbonaceous shale containing marine fossils in part, sporadic conglomerate beds, and local diamictite. The Burgoon Sandstone is light-gray to buff, medium- grained, crossbedded sandstone and minor siltstone, and includes conglomerate in places toward the base; it contains plant fossils and minor, thin coals locally.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming Counties Pennsylvania
    Geology of the Ransom Quadrangle Lackawanna, Luzerne, and Wyoming Counties Pennsylvania By THOMAS M. KEHN, ERNEST E. GLICK, and WILLIAM C. CULBERTSON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1213 Description of the outcropping and subsurface strata of Devonian, Mississippian, and Pennsylvanian age and of the unconsolidated sediments of Quaternary age UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1966 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY William T. Pecora, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 66-215 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract---------------------------------------------------------- 1 Introduction______________________________________________________ 2 Location and extent of area_____________________________________ 2 Purpose and scope of report_____________________________________ 3 Fieldwork and examination of well cuttings_______________________ 4 Acknowledgments _____________________________ - _____ --- ---- --_ 5 Previouswork_________________________________________________ 5 Topography and drainage ____________________ ------_------_________ 5 StratigraphY------------------------------------------------------ 7 DevonianSystem---------------------------------------------- 8 Lower Devonian Series_____________________________________ 8 IIelderberg GrouP------------------------------------- 8 Kalkberg Limestone ____________ --------______ ----_ 8 New Scotland Limestone equivalent_________________
    [Show full text]
  • Caledonian-Appalachian Orogen Palaeomagnetic Constraints on The
    Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ at Columbia University on January 17, 2012 Geological Society, London, Special Publications Palaeomagnetic constraints on the evolution of the Caledonian-Appalachian orogen J. C. Briden, D. V. Kent, P. L. Lapointe, J. L. Roy, R. A. Livermore, A. G. Smith, M. K. Seguin, R. Van der Voo and D. R. Watts Geological Society, London, Special Publications 1988, v.38; p35-48. doi: 10.1144/GSL.SP.1988.038.01.03 Email alerting click here to receive free e-mail alerts when service new articles cite this article Permission click here to seek permission to re-use all or request part of this article Subscribe click here to subscribe to Geological Society, London, Special Publications or the Lyell Collection Notes © The Geological Society of London 2012 Downloaded from http://sp.lyellcollection.org/ at Columbia University on January 17, 2012 Palaeomagnetic constraints on the evolution of the Caledonian- Appalachian orogen J. C. Briden, D. V. Kent, P. L. Lapointe, R. A. Livermore, J. L. Roy, M. K. Seguin, A. G. Smith, R. Van der Voo & D. R. Watts SUMMARY: Late Proterozoic and Palaeozoic (pre-Permian) palaeomagnetic data from all regions involved in, or adjacent to, the Caledonian-Appalachian orogenic belt are reviewed. Between about 1100 and about 800 Ma the Laurentian and Baltic shields were close together, prior to the opening phase of the Caledonian-Appalachian Wilson cycle. The problems of tectonic interpretation of Palaeozoic palaeomagnetic data from within and around the belt derive mostly from differences of typically 10°-20° between the pole positions. These can variously be interpreted in terms of (i) relative displacements between different continents or terranes, (ii) differences in ages of remanence and (iii) aberrations due to inadequacy of data or geomagnetic complexity, and it is not always easy to discriminate between these alternatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Resources Inventory Ancillary Map Information Document
    U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Stewardship and Science Directorate Geologic Resources Division Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial GRI Ancillary Map Information Document Produced to accompany the Geologic Resources Inventory (GRI) Digital Geologic-GIS Data for Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial alpo_jofl_geology.pdf Version: 5/11/2020 I Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial Geologic Resources Inventory Map Document for Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site and Johnstown Flood National Memorial Table of Contents Geologic Resourc..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n..t.o...r.y.. .M...a..p.. .D...o..c..u..m...e...n..t............................................................................ 1 About the NPS Ge..o..l.o..g..i.c... .R..e..s..o..u...r.c..e..s.. .I.n..v..e..n...t.o..r.y.. .P...r.o..g...r.a..m............................................................... 3 GRI Digital Maps a..n...d.. .S..o..u...r.c..e.. .M...a..p.. .C...i.t.a..t.i.o...n..s.................................................................................. 5 Index Map .................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Digital Bedrock Geologic-GIS Map of Allegheny Portage Railroad National Historic Site, John..s..t..o..w...n.. .F..l.o..o...d.. .N...a..t.i.o..n..a..l. .M...e..m...o...r.i.a..l. .a..n..d... .V..i.c..i.n..i.t.y.................................................. 7 Map Unit Lis.t................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Map Unit De.s..c..r.i.p..t.io..n..s...................................................................................................................................................... 8 PNcc - Cas.s..e..l.m...a..n.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippian, in CH Shultz Ed, the Geology of Pennsylvania
    -- -~-- - ~--- ~ ~ QC) SCALE 10 20 30 40 50 MI I I I' '. i 1 " 20 40 60 80 KM 79' 77" 76' N. Y. ________ J ----~~~--.,..___l------~-.\-42' TIOG~ BRADFORD I SUSQUEHANNA' -:..' \, WAYNE-'~" ~ ""'* '\ '\ . " '\ \ ... \ , ). .,. '----- --I . '" 0 WYOMING / t ... 75 , \ ' i. 5~, /~1- L~NA\ / P;;~~ S" ;r;~ ..J--~ I~' MONROE L.\ /: .LL ,~\_,41' ~ \ 75' ./" j MPTONI I /' LEHIGH \ ). ,-" -1 j BERKS -", 'y'-' -", / BUCKS 1 '" j-/:r , '''' ~ -, \ >, / '", ::-~ ------- ~ , ..-/' L ' -'f' CUMBERLAND \ _- " .r~. MONTGOMERY'" '" ''\ _ ') . ?'" LANCASTER.. -......; "'\/"- '",/CHESTER ).." ('""''l.. f~- ,/ YORK \.... (.'V~.l"lr' .--/'-, '\ /' 7".) ft1i7 40' ADAMS\, ,.? \ ...J; , '-....',) Jq.... 75' \ \) ,>-/~ELAWAI!S_;/. .r , ~~~___ -L~J--Ll ______ ~ -....l-~---(' DEl.,~. J. b..~~~ L __ _______ 7S' 77' MD. 76' I Figure 9-1. Distribution of Mississippian strata at the surface (solid color) and in the subsurface (line pattern) in Pennsylvania (from Pennsylvania Geological Survey, 1990). 1, Anthracite region; 2, Broad Top coal basin; 3, AJlegheny Front; 4, Chestnut Ridge; 5, Laurel Hm; 6, Negro Mountain; 7, northwestern Pennsylvania; 8, north-central Pennsylvania. Part II. Stratigraphy and Sedimentary Tectonics CHAPTER 9 MISSISSIPPIAN DAVID K. BREZINSKI INTRODUCTION Maryland Geological Survey Mississippian rocks are distributed at the sur­ 2300 St. Paul Street face in Pennsylvania in the Anthracite region, the Baltimore, MD 21218 Broad Top coal basin, along the Allegheny Front, along the axes of the Chestnut Ridge, Laurel Hill, and Negro Mountain anticlines, and in the north­ western and north-central parts of the state (Figure 9-1). Generally, Mississippian rocks are thickest in the Middle and Southern Anthracite fields and thin to the west and north (Figure 9-2). The Mississippian Period of Pennsylvania rep­ resents a transition from the prograding deltas of the Middle and Late Devonian Period to the cyclic allu­ vial and paludal environments of the Pennsylvanian Period.
    [Show full text]