DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix: General Notes on Poor Law and Organized Charity Data

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Appendix: General Notes on Poor Law and Organized Charity Data I. Poor Law data has in the main been extracted from Parliamentary Accounts and Papers, or from the PLB and LGB Annual Reports and Appendices. For references to individual years: Peter Cockton, Subject Catalogue of the House of Commons Parliamentary Papers, 1801-1900, Part 111 (Cambridge, 1988), pp.580-1 and pp.591-8. 2. Poor Law outdoor relief financial data are for the twelve-month period ending Lady Day, 25 March, unless otherwise stated. 3. The tabulated number of outdoor paupers shown in the various tables has generally been calculated from the sum of the one-day count on 1 January that year, plus the number counted on 1 July of the previous year. This assessment is justified by evidence compiled by the LGB in 1881 and 1892, and by the 1905-8 Royal Commission on the Poor Law. Each of these sources indicate that the total number of paupers relieved in a particular twelve-month period can be conservatively assumed to equal twice the average of the succeeding one-day counts (BPP 1908, XCII, p.359). The data from I July of the previous year has been used so that the tabulated number of paupers in any twelve months is more closely equivalent to the financial data. 4. Poor Law costs and numbers are exclusive of lunatics, idiots and the insane in mental institutions. However, these paupers were classified by the LGB as outdoor paupers and their cost had to be borne by their settlement union. In 1871 the number in these mentally disadvantaged categories was nationally around 4.5 per cent of the outdoor pauper total. Over the next two decades there was a marked percentage increase to 9.8 per cent. This growth partly resulted from the crusade against outdoor relief for the mentally sound, and partly because of the increasing tendency to care more professionally for the mentally ill in asylums designed to suit multi-union needs. In cities and towns committed to anti-outdoor relief policies, the proportion of mentally inadequate paupers cared for in this way increased dramatically. For example, at Birmingham the total from the one-day counts for 1.7.89 and 1.1.90 was 1725, compared with the total of 2823 mentally sound outdoor paupers. 5. Data for the provincial COSs, the Liverpool CRS and the Manchester and Salford DPS were compiled from their annual reports, minute books or other documents relating to the particular society. Supplementary information and comments were derived from COS documents and publications including the Charity Organisation Reporter (COR), and the Charity Organisation Review (COReview). 6. (a) In the data from organizing societies, the category tabled as 'not relieved' includes those who were 'ineligible', 'undeserving', 'found not to be requiring relief, 'guilty of providing false information especially an incorrect address', and in the second half of the 1880s those 'not likely to benefit'. 175 176 Appendix (b) Those who were 'referred' include applicants sent with a favourable message to other charitable agencies, committees, private persons, guardians and to other COSs. (c) The 'relieved' category includes those receiving grants, loans, pensions and other forms of assistance debited directly to the local COS accounts. Notes CHAPTER 1 1. Samuel Smiles, Self-Help (1859); Harriet Martineau, Illustrations of Political Economy (9 vols, 1832-4). 2. M. Simey, Charitable Effort in Liverpool (Liverpool, 1951). 3. Thomas Hawksley, The Charities of London and some of the Errors in their Administration (1869), p.l3. 4. Charles Booth, Life and Labour of the People of London, 17 volumes (1902); Seebohm Rowntree, Poverty: A Study of Town Life; and J. Rae, Contempormy Socialism (New York, 1884), pp.57-8. 5. T.R. Malthus, An Essay on Population, Vol. II (1914 edn), pp.143 and 177. 6. C.L. Mowat, The Charity Organisation Society, 1869-1913, (1961), pp.10-19; also K. de Schweinitz, England's Road to Social Security (1975 edn), pp.135-8. 7. 17th Annual Report, COS Council (1886), p.l. 8. BPP 1870, 22nd Annual Report, Poor Law Board, Appendix 4 (c123), XXXV.I, p.9. 9. Charity Organisation Reporter, 24 February 1881, p.50. 10. BPP 1870, ibid., p.11 11. Charles Murray, The Emerging British Underclass (1990), p.22 and pp.1-35. 12. Russell D. Roberts, 'A positive Model of Private Charity and Public Transfers', Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 92, No. 1, February-June (1984), p.147. 13. C. Murray, In Pursuit of Happiness and Good Government (New York, 1988), p.112. 14. J. Moore, 'Welfare and Dependency', speech to Conservative Constituency Parties Ass., September 1987; cited in R. Jowell, S. Witherspoon and L. Brook (eds), British Social Attitudes, 7th Report (Aidershot, 1990), p.lO. 15. C. Murray (1988), op. cit., pp.260 and 289. 16. Michael B. Katz, ln the Shadow of the Poorhouse (New York, 1986), p.280. 17. They include: C.B.P. Bosanquet, The History and Mode of Operation of the Charity Organisation Society (1874); T. Hawksley, Objections to 'The History' of the Society (1874); H. Bosanquet, Social Work in London 1869-1912: A History of the COS (1914); C.L. Mowat, The Charity Organisation Society, 1869-1913: Its Ideas and Work (1961); D. Owen English Philanthropy, 1660-1960 (1965), pp.211-46; K. de Schweinitz, England's Road to Social Security (South Brunswick, 1975), pp.140-53; M. Rooff,A Hundred Years of Family Welfare (1972), pp.22-63; A.F. Young and E.T. Ashton, British Social Work in the Nineteenth Century (1956), pp.92-114; K. Woodroofe, From Charity to Social Work (1968), pp.25-55; Judith Fido, 'The COS and Social Casework in London, 1869-1900', A.P. Donajgrodzki (ed.) Social Control in Nineteenth Century Britain (1977), pp.207-30. 18. H. Bosanquet, op. cit., p.392. 177 178 Notes 19. COR, 26 May 1881, p.l24. 20. Jose Harris, 'Political thought and the Welfare State: ... ',Past and Present, 135 (May 1992), p.l21. 21. David Owen, op. cit., p.215. 22. Attributed to G.V. Rimlinger in foreword to Chapter 6: Andrew Vincent and Raymond Plant, Philosophy, Politics, and Citizenship (Oxford 197 4 ), p.94. 23. C.L. Mowat, op. cit., p.91 et seq. 24. A.F. Young and E.T. Ashton, op. cit., p.lOl. 25. Jose Harris, Unemployment and Politics (Oxford 1972), p.l 05. 26. A. W. Vincent, 'The Poor Law Reports of 1909 and the social theory of the Charity Organisation Society', Victorian Studies, 27 (1983-4), p.347. 27. Christopher Harvie, The Lights of Liberalism (1976), pp.l95~; and A.F. Young and E.T. Ashton, op. cit., p.lOl. 28. K. Woodroofe, op. cit., p.39. 29. First AR, LGB, Appendix 20, BPP 1872. (c516), XXVIII. pp.63-8. 30. W. Hanna, Memoirs of the Life and Writings of Thomas Chalmers, D. D., 4 Vols (Edinburgh 1849-52); A. Doyle,'The Poor Law System of Elberfeld', Poor Laws in Foreign Countries, Reports by H.M Sec. of State for Foreign Affairs, BPP 1875 (cl255), LXV.!; Doyle's paper also published in: BPP 1872 (c516), XXVIII, Appendix 35, pp.244-65. 31. 'Why is it wrong to Supplement Outdoor Relief?', COS Occasional Paper No. 31 (1893), p.l. 32. For example, Francis Peek, The Uncharitableness of Inadequate Relief, COS pamphlet dated 20 May 1879, p.l; and Sophia Lonsdale, The Evils of a Lax System of Outdoor Relief, COS pamphlet dated 30 Aprill895, p.4. 33. Francis Peek, ibid., p.IO 34. A.J. Taylor Laissez-faire and State Intervention in Nineteenth-century Britain (Basingstoke, 1988 reprint), pp.50-l. 35. W.L. Bum, The Age of Equipoise ( 1964), pp.22~ and pp.289-91. 36. Michael Freeden, The New Liberalism, (Oxford, 1878); Helen M. Lynd, England in the Eighteen Eighties (1968), pp.237-98; Henrietta Barnett, Canon Barnett: His Life, His Work, His Friends (1919); and Gillian Darley, Octavia Hill ( 1990), p.l28. CHAPTER2 1. The Poor Law Report of 1834, re-published with introduction by S.G. and E.O.A. Checkland (1974), p.334. 2. W. Chance, The Better Administration of the Poor Law, Charity Organisation Series (1895), p.l. 3. The Poor Law Report of 1834, op. cit., p.429. 4. K. de Schweinitz, England's Road to Social Security (South Brunswick, 1975 edn), p.131. 5. A. Digby, The Poor Law in Nineteenth-century England and Wales (1982), p.27. 6. The Poor Law Report of 1834, op. cit., pp.475-6. 7. S. and B. Webb, English Poor Law History, Part II (1929), p.419. Notes 179 8. A. Digby (1982), op. cit., p.27. 9. D. Ashforth, 'Settlement and n:moval in Urban Areas: Bradford 1834-1871 ',in M.E. Rose (ed.), The Poor and the City: The English Poor Law and Its Urban Context 1834-I9I4 (Leicester, 1985), pp.61-2. 10. BPP 1909, Report of the Royal Commission on the Poor Laws and the Relief of Distress, p.83 (c4499), XXXVII. 11. K.D.M. Snell, Annals of the Labouring Poor (1987), p. 72. 12. Second Annual Report, Poor Law Commissioners, BPP 1836 (c595), XXIX, p.43. 13. 6th AR, Poor Law Commissioners, BPP 1840 (c245), XVII, pp.16-18. 14. Report of the Royal Commission ... (1909), op. cit., p.141. 15. Letters of the Poor Law Commissioners Relative to the Transaction of Business of the Commission (1847), cited inK. de Schweinitz, op. cit., p.131. 16. Report of the Royal Commission ... (1909), op. cit., p.142. 17. M.E. Rose, 'The Allowance System under the New Poor Law', Economic Hist01y Review, 2nd Series, Vol.XIX (1966), p.610.
Recommended publications
  • Scandal, Child Punishment and Policy Making in the Early Years of the New Poor Law Workhouse System

    Scandal, Child Punishment and Policy Making in the Early Years of the New Poor Law Workhouse System

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Lincoln Institutional Repository ‘Great inhumanity’: Scandal, child punishment and policy making in the early years of the New Poor Law workhouse system SAMANTHA A. SHAVE UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN ABSTRACT New Poor Law scandals have usually been examined either to demonstrate the cruelty of the workhouse regime or to illustrate the failings or brutality of union staff. Recent research has used these and similar moments of crisis to explore the relationship between local and central levels of welfare administration (the Boards of Guardians in unions across England and Wales and the Poor Law Commission in Somerset House in London) and how scandals in particular were pivotal in the development of further policies. This article examines both the inter-local and local-centre tensions and policy conseQuences of the Droxford Union and Fareham Union scandal (1836-37) which exposed the severity of workhouse punishments towards three young children. The paper illustrates the complexities of union co-operation and, as a result of the escalation of public knowledge into the cruelties and investigations thereafter, how the vested interests of individuals within a system manifested themselves in particular (in)actions and viewpoints. While the Commission was a reactive and flexible welfare authority, producing new policies and procedures in the aftermath of crises, the policies developed after this particular scandal made union staff, rather than the welfare system as a whole, individually responsible for the maltreatment and neglect of the poor. 1. Introduction Within the New Poor Law Union workhouse, inmates depended on the poor law for their complete subsistence: a roof, a bed, food, work and, for the young, an education.
  • Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553

    Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553

    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 1986 Basilisks of the Commonwealth: Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553 Christopher Thomas Daly College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Daly, Christopher Thomas, "Basilisks of the Commonwealth: Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553" (1986). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539625366. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-y42p-8r81 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. BASILISKS OF THE COMMONWEALTH: Vagrants and Vagrancy in England, 1485-1553 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Department of History The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts fcy Christopher T. Daly 1986 APPROVAL SHEET This thesis is submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts . s F J i z L s _____________ Author Approved, August 1986 James L. Axtell Dale E. Hoak JamesEL McCord, IjrT DEDICATION To my brother, grandmother, mother and father, with love and respect. iii TABLE OE CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .................................. v ABSTRACT.......................................... vi INTRODUCTION ...................................... 2 CHAPTER I. THE PROBLEM OE VAGRANCY AND GOVERNMENTAL RESPONSES TO IT, 1485-1553 7 CHAPTER II.
  • DOUGLAS BROWN DRAFT 1 This Is an Accepted Manuscript of a Book

    DOUGLAS BROWN DRAFT 1 This Is an Accepted Manuscript of a Book

    DOUGLAS BROWN DRAFT This is an Accepted Manuscript of a book chapter published by Routledge in The Routledge Companion to Spatial History on 18/01/18, available online: https://www.routledge.com/The-Routledge-Companion-to-Spatial-History/Gregory- DeBats-Lafreniere/p/book/9781138860148 1 DOUGLAS BROWN DRAFT The Routledge Handbook in Spatial History Geographies of welfare in nineteenth-century England and Wales Douglas Brown, Department of Geography & Geology, Kingston University, UK Why did the amounts and types of poor relief given in mid-nineteenth century England and Wales vary so greatly in different parts of the country? The research described in this chapter is an effort to tackle this question using geographic information systems techniques. The problem has tended to be addressed only in regional aggregate, and though the broad-brush approach has yielded a useful overall impression it has not provided the fine resolution required for a full, detailed picture of relief practices and experiences across the country. This research shows the significance of detailed spatial thinking in examining poor relief. First, it shows that mapping relief expenditure at the local level provides the opportunity for a more nuanced understanding of the welfare landscape; and second, it demonstrates the importance of socio-spatial relationships between poor law unions – the local authorities responsible for administrating relief – and their surrounding economies. The New Poor Law From 1834 the destitute of England and Wales had a new environment of rights,
  • Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant Traditions Compared

    Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant Traditions Compared

    The Religious Roots of Modern Poverty Policy: Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant Traditions Compared The poor are always with us. Mathew (: ) . Introduction T that the community has a moral responsibility to support the poor is a central message of the Bible (). In this paper, I showthatthisbasicprincipleunderliesmodernsocialassistance,butthatit has played out in very different ways in societies according to the relative predominance of Catholic, Lutheran, and Reformed Protestant religious heritages and that these patterns can be seen today in variations in social assistance and welfare-to-work policies in OECD countries. I argue that reference to the social doctrines and poor relief systems of historically significant Christian denominations can help to answer a series of otherwise perplexing cross-national differences in poverty policy. ¢ A core concern of the welfare state is to ensure that no impoverished citizen be left without help. To this end, almost all OECD countries have a national tax-financed last resort safety net (social assistance). Why do Italy, Spain and Greece lack this safety net? Why did France intro- duce it only years ago? ¢ Why do Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland and Germany just have one universal social assistance program, while France, Italy, the United States, the United Kingdom and Ireland have categorical systems with many different social assistance programs, ranging from eight benefits in France to an uncountable and highly varied array of localized programs in Italy? () This paper has benefited greatly from Western Welfare State and its Religious Roots at comments from Josh Whitford. Comments the Max Planck Institute for the Study of from Philip Manow, Jan Rehmann and the Societies are also gratefully acknowledged.
  • Zn the Nineteenth Century

    Zn the Nineteenth Century

    INTERNATIONAL LIBRARY OF SOCIOLOGY British AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION Founded by Karl Mannhelm Social Work Editor W. J. H. Sprott zn the Nineteenth Century by A. F. Young and E. T. Ashton BC B 20623 73 9177 A catalogue of books available In the IN'rERNATIONAL LlDRARY OF ROUTLEDGE & KEGAN PAUL LTD SOCIOLOGY AND SOCIAL RECONSTRUCTION and new books m Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane preparation for the Library will be found at the end of this volume London, E.C.4 UIA-BIBLIOTHEEK 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 11 """ ------------------------ Text continues after this page ------------------------ This publication is made available in the context of the history of social work project. See www.historyofsocialwork.org It is our aim to respect authors’ and publishers’ copyright. Should you feel we violated those, please do get in touch with us. Deze publicatie wordt beschikbaar gesteld in het kader van de canon sociaal werk. Zie www.canonsociaalwerk.eu Het is onze wens de rechten van auteurs en uitgevers te respecten. Mocht je denken dat we daarin iets fout doen, gelieve ons dan te contacteren. ------------------------ Tekst gaat verder na deze pagina ------------------------ r-= ! First published in 1956 I by Routledge and Kegan Paul Lld Broadway House, 68-74 Carter Lane London, E.C.4 Second impresszon 1963 I Third impression 1967 Printed in Great Britatn by CONTENTS Butler and Tanner Ltd Acknowledgments vu Frome and London I Introduction page I I . PART ONE I ' IDEAS WHICH INFLUENCED THE DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL WORK L I Influence of social and economic thought 7 I ConditWns-2 EcoROImc and Political Theories 2 Religious thought in the nineteenth century 28 I The Church if Engtar.d-2 The Tractarians-g Tilt Chris- tian Socialists-4 The JYonconformists-5 The Methodists- 6 The Unitarians-7 The Q.uakers-8 Conclusion 3 Influence of poor law prinClples and practice 43 I TIre problems and principles of poor law administration- 2 Criticisms by Social Workers and thezr results PART TWO MAIN BRANCHES OF SOCIAL WORK 4 Family case work-I.
  • The New Poor Law and the Struggle for Union Chargeability

    The New Poor Law and the Struggle for Union Chargeability

    MA URICE CA PLAN THE NEW POOR LAW AND THE STRUGGLE FOR UNION CHARGEABILITY Thrasymachus: "Listen then. I define justice or right as what is in the interest of the stronger party." Plato, The Republic, I, St. 338 While much has been heard in recent times of the evils attaching to "the principles of 1834", other important aspects of the New Poor Law have been seriously neglected. The laws of settlement and removal were unjust and inhumane, and the system of parochial rating was anomalous, uneven and, indeed, thoroughly iniquitous. One of the main features of the Poor Law Amendment Act had been the grouping of the parishes of England and Wales into unions of parishes. Those of a medium-sized town usually constituted one union, while in the countryside the typical union tended to comprise all the parishes within a radius of up to about ten miles of a country town, its centre. Under the Act, the administration of the Poor Law was based on the union and not, as heretofore, on the parish; yet the latter remained the financial unit, each parish being chargeable for its own Poor Law expenditure. This uneven arrangement prevented the effective oper- ation of the Act, and, as will be shown, had unhappy consequences. Attempts at reform in these matters were strenuously opposed in Parlia- ment between 1845 and 1865, and only in the latter year was the Union Chargeability Act passed. The purpose of the present article is to show that the main opposition to reform came from a section of the landed interest whose object was to maintain the status quo with regard to settlement law and to keep alive the pernicious distinction between open and close parishes.
  • Managing Poverty in Victorian England and Wales

    Managing Poverty in Victorian England and Wales

    How Cruel was the Victorian Workhouse/Poor Law Union? ‘Living the Poorlife’ Paul Carter November 2009 MH 12/10320, Clutton Poor Law Union correspondence, 1834 – 1838. Coloured, hand drawn map of the parishes within the Clutton Poor Law Union, Somerset. 1836. Llanfyllin Workhouse Poor Law Report of the Commissioners, 1834. 1. Outdoor relief to continue for the aged and infirm – but abolished for the able bodied – who would be „offered the house‟. 2. Conditions in the workhouse to be „less eligible‟ than that of the lowest paid labourer. * To make the workhouse a feared institution of last resort. 3. Establish a central Poor Law Commission with three commissioners to oversee the poor law and create/impose national uniformity. 4. Parishes to be joined together in Poor Law Unions, share a central workhouse, governed by elected guardians, run by a master/mistress of the house. Poor Law Commission Somerset House George Nicholls, Frankland Lewis and John George Shaw-Lefevre Edwin Chadwick Assistant Poor Law Commissioners (secretary) Central workhouse 300: Poor Law Union (Board 1834-1839 of Guardians) Master/Mistress Parish A. Parish B. Parish C. Parish D. Clerk to the Guardians MH 12: Poor Law Union Correspondence 16,741 volumes. 10,881,650 folios. 21,763,300 pages. c. 200 words per page. 4,352,660,000 words. Berwick upon Tweed Tynemouth Reeth Liverpool Keighley Mansfield Basford (North Staffs) Wolstanton and Buslem, and Newcastle under Lyme Llanfyllin (North Worcs) Cardiff Kidderminster and Bromsgrove Mitford and Launditch Blything Newport Pagnell Bishops Stortford Rye Truro Axminster Clutton Southampton MH 12/5967 Liverpool Select Vestry.
  • 'Great Inhumanity': Scandal, Child Punishment and Policy Making in the Early Years of the New Poor Law Workhouse System S

    'Great Inhumanity': Scandal, Child Punishment and Policy Making in the Early Years of the New Poor Law Workhouse System S

    ‘Great inhumanity’: Scandal, child punishment and policy making in the early years of the New Poor Law workhouse system SAMANTHA A. SHAVE UNIVERSITY OF LINCOLN ABSTRACT New Poor Law scandals have usually been examined either to demonstrate the cruelty of the workhouse regime or to illustrate the failings or brutality of union staff. Recent research has used these and similar moments of crisis to explore the relationship between local and central levels of welfare administration (the Boards of Guardians in unions across England and Wales and the Poor Law Commission in Somerset House in London) and how scandals in particular were pivotal in the development of further policies. This article examines both the inter-local and local-centre tensions and policy conseQuences of the Droxford Union and Fareham Union scandal (1836-37) which exposed the severity of workhouse punishments towards three young children. The paper illustrates the complexities of union co-operation and, as a result of the escalation of public knowledge into the cruelties and investigations thereafter, how the vested interests of individuals within a system manifested themselves in particular (in)actions and viewpoints. While the Commission was a reactive and flexible welfare authority, producing new policies and procedures in the aftermath of crises, the policies developed after this particular scandal made union staff, rather than the welfare system as a whole, individually responsible for the maltreatment and neglect of the poor. 1. Introduction Within the New Poor Law Union workhouse, inmates depended on the poor law for their complete subsistence: a roof, a bed, food, work and, for the young, an education.
  • The Poor Law of 1601

    The Poor Law of 1601

    Tit) POOR LA.v OF 1601 with 3oms coi3ii3rat,ion of MODSRN Of t3l9 POOR -i. -S. -* CH a i^ 3 B oone. '°l<g BU 2502377 2 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Chapter 1. Introductory. * E. Poor Relief before the Tudor period w 3. The need for re-organisation. * 4. The Great Poor La* of 1601. w 5. Historical Sketch. 1601-1909. " 6. 1909 and after. Note. The small figares occurring in the text refer to notes appended to each chapter. Chapter 1. .Introductory.. In an age of stress and upheaval, institutions and 9 systems which we have come to take for granted are subjected to a searching test, which, though more violent, can scarcely fail to be more valuable than the criticism of more normal times. A reconstruction of our educational system seems inevitable after the present struggle; in fact new schemes have already been set forth by accredited organisations such as the national Union of Teachers and the Workers' Educational Association. V/ith the other subjects in the curriculum of the schools, History will have to stand on its defence.
  • Almshouse, Workhouse, Outdoor Relief: Responses to the Poor in Southeastern Massachusetts, 1740-1800” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 31, No

    Almshouse, Workhouse, Outdoor Relief: Responses to the Poor in Southeastern Massachusetts, 1740-1800” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 31, No

    Jennifer Turner, “Almshouse, Workhouse, Outdoor Relief: Responses to the Poor in Southeastern Massachusetts, 1740-1800” Historical Journal of Massachusetts Volume 31, No. 2 (Summer 2003). Published by: Institute for Massachusetts Studies and Westfield State University You may use content in this archive for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the Historical Journal of Massachusetts regarding any further use of this work: [email protected] Funding for digitization of issues was provided through a generous grant from MassHumanities. Some digitized versions of the articles have been reformatted from their original, published appearance. When citing, please give the original print source (volume/ number/ date) but add "retrieved from HJM's online archive at http://www.westfield.ma.edu/mhj. Editor, Historical Journal of Massachusetts c/o Westfield State University 577 Western Ave. Westfield MA 01086 Almshouse, Workhouse, Outdoor Relief: Responses to the Poor in Southeastern Massachusetts, 1740-1800 By Jennifer Turner In Duxbury, Massachusetts, local folklore emphasizes that before the current Surplus Street was named, it was called Poverty Lane because it led to the “poor” farm, and before it was Poverty Lane, local residents knew it as Folly Street, over which one’s folly led to the Almshouse.1 Although such local folklore suggests a rather stringent attitude towards giving alms to the poor in colonial society, the issue of poor relief absorbed much of the attention of town officials before and after the American Revolution. Throughout the colonial period and early republic, many Massachusetts towns faced growing numbers of needy men, women and children in need of relief.
  • The Poor Law of Lunacy

    The Poor Law of Lunacy

    The Poor Law of Lunacy: The Administration of Pauper Lunatics in Mid-Nineteenth Century England with special Emphasis on Leicestershire and Rutland Peter Bartlett Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University College London. University of London 1993 Abstract Previous historical studies of the care of the insane in nineteenth century England have been based in the history of medicine. In this thesis, such care is placed in the context of the English poor law. The theory of the 1834 poor law was essentially silent on the treatment of the insane. That did not mean that developments in poor law had no effect only that the effects must be established by examination of administrative practices. To that end, this thesis focuses on the networks of administration of the poor law of lunacy, from 1834 to 1870. County asylums, a creation of the old (pre-1834) poor law, grew in numbers and scale only under the new poor law. While remaining under the authority of local Justices of the Peace, mid-century legislation provided an increasing role for local poor law staff in the admissions process. At the same time, workhouse care of the insane increased. Medical specialists in lunacy were generally excluded from local admissions decisions. The role of central commissioners was limited to inspecting and reporting; actual decision-making remained at the local level. The webs of influence between these administrators are traced, and the criteria they used to make decisions identified. The Leicestershire and Rutland Lunatic asylum provides a local study of these relations. Particular attention is given to admission documents and casebooks for those admitted to the asylum between 1861 and 1865.
  • Lec-4 History of Social Welfare Developments in the UK

    Lec-4 History of Social Welfare Developments in the UK

    Topic 3 THE HISTORY OF AND DEVELOPMENT OF SOCIAL WELFARE IN THE UK: The history of social welfare in the UK had gone through various phases Before the Old Poor Law: ✓ During the early 1500s, the English government made little effort to address the needs of the poor. ✓ Rather, the poor were taken care of by Christians who were undertaking the seven-corporal works of mercy. ✓ These were deeds aimed to remove the worries and distress of those in need in accordance with their religious teachings. ▪ feed the hungry ▪ give drink to the thirsty ▪ welcome the stranger ▪ clothe the naked ▪ visit the sick ▪ visit the prisoner ▪ bury the dead ✓ The main formal organizations were the Church and the monasteries (a place reserved for prayer which may be a chapel, church or temple, or reserved for monks or nuns). The operation of charity made it possible for some poor people to survive if they left the land and came to the cities. ✓ However, when the Reformation1 happened, many people stopped following this Christian practice and the poor began to suffer greatly. ✓ The poverty and the begging were the ultimate problems followed by the Reformation. In 1531 Henry VI issued license for begging in restricted areas; punishment was given to those who violated the law. ✓ Poverty was one of the major problems Elizabeth faced during her rule. During this period the number of unemployed people grew considerably for a 1 The Reformation was a movement in Western Europe that aimed at reforming the doctrines and practices of the Roman Catholic Church The Monasteries had been dissolved by King Henry VIII in the years following 1536, this source of aid was no longer available to the poor.