Italian SSH Journals in Journal Citation Reports (JCR) and in Scimago Journal Rank (SJR): Data and first Analysis
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
But What Does Science Say?
But what does science say? By Mariano Rocchi Please note that this lecture was originally given to an Italian audience and therefore often refers to Italian examples and literature, including Dante. Right now, disoriented by the coronavirus pandemic, many people are asking themselves this very question. This article is intended to help you navigate a world in which the news is suddenly full of science, or at least information sold as ‘science’. After a few introductory paragraphs, I will use examples to explain how science works. Let us start with a very simple, almost simplistic statement: news can be considered scientific if it has been published in a scientific journal. Of course, that in itself is not enough, and we’ll see why, but it helps a lot. Procedure for a scientific publication A researcher, or more often a group of researchers, writes an article on the results of his or her research and submits it to a scientific journal. A first reading of the summary is useful for the editors of the journal to decide if the article is suitable for their journal and whether it contains important innovations compared to what is already known on the subject. If this first judgment is positive, the article is sent to anonymous referees who evaluate it. Referees are usually experts on the subject of the article. They formulate their judgments and send them to the editor who, depending on their recommendations, decides whether or not to accept the article and publish it. That it is a ‘scientific journal” does not to say everything. -
Free Download
HOW TRUSTWORTHY? AN EXHIBITION ON NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, AND MEASURING INTEGRITY ISBN 978-3-00-061938-0 © 2019 HEADT Centre Publications, Berlin Cover Image Eagle Nebula, M 16, Messier 16 NASA, ESA / Hubble and the Hubble Heritage Team (2015) Original picture in color, greyscale edited © HEADT Centre (2018) Typesetting and Design Kerstin Kühl Print and Binding 15 Grad Printed in Germany www.headt.eu 1 EXHIBITION CATALOGUE HOW TRUSTWORTHY? AN EXHIBITION ON NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, AND MEASURING INTEGRITY Edited by Dr. Thorsten Stephan Beck, Melanie Rügenhagen and Prof. Dr. Michael Seadle HEADT Centre Publications goal of the exhibition The goal of this exhibition is to increase awareness about research integrity. The exhibition highlights areas where both human errors and intentional manipulation have resulted in the loss of positions and damage to careers. Students, doctoral students, and early career scholars especially need to recognize the risks, but senior scholars can also be caught and sometimes are caught for actions decades earlier. There is no statute of limitations for breaches of good scholarly practice. This exhibition serves as a learning tool. It was designed in part by students in a project seminar offered in the joint master’s programme on Digital Curation between Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and King’s College London. The exhibition has four parts. One has to do with image manipulation and falsification, ranging from art works to tests used in medical studies. Another focuses on research data, including human errors, bad choices, and complete fabrication. A third is concerned with text-based information, and discusses plagiarism as well as fake journals and censorship. -
Journal Topic Citation Potential and Between-Field Comparisons: the Topic Normalized Impact Factor
Journal topic citation potential and between-field comparisons: The topic normalized impact factor Pablo Dorta-González a, María Isabel Dorta-González b, Dolores Rosa Santos-Peñate a, Rafael Suárez-Vega a a Instituto de Turismo y Desarrollo Económico Sostenible Tides, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain; b Departamento de Estadística, Investigación Operativa y Computación, Universidad de La Laguna, Spain. ABSTRACT The journal impact factor is not comparable among fields of science and social science because of systematic differences in publication and citation behaviour across disciplines. In this work, a source normalization of the journal impact factor is proposed. We use the aggregate impact factor of the citing journals as a measure of the citation potential in the journal topic, and we employ this citation potential in the normalization of the journal impact factor to make it comparable between scientific fields. An empirical application comparing some impact indicators with our topic normalized impact factor in a set of 224 journals from four different fields shows that our normalization, using the citation potential in the journal topic, reduces the between- group variance with respect to the within-group variance in a higher proportion than the rest of indicators analysed. The effect of journal self-citations over the normalization process is also studied. Keywords: journal assessment; journal metric; bibliometric indicator; citation analysis; journal impact factor; source normalization; citation potential. 1 1. Introduction This work is related to journal metrics and citation-based indicators for the assessment of scientific scholar journals from a general bibliometric perspective. For decades, the journal impact factor (JIF) has been an accepted indicator in ranking journals. -
Journals 2020 Journals
1 JOURNALS catalog BRILL CATALOG 2020 BRILL CATALOG Journals 2020 Journals Over three centuries of scholarly publishing 2020 Brill Online Contents Highlighted Titles of centuries publishing three scholarly Over Journal Collection Brill Journal Archives 3 Art History Online (2020) 2020 Brill Online Journal 9 Asian Studies 30 Classical Studies Collection 36 Education 39 History 59 Human Rights & Humanitarian Law 66 International Law 81 Jewish Studies The Brill Journal Archives Online provide specic benets to both researchers and librarians: See page 1 ResearchersSee page 2 Librarians Brill Online Journal Collection - Complete access to all available content of leading - Cost-efective access to the complete history 86 academic journals in the humanities, social sciences, of journals to support research and teaching. Languages and Linguistics international law & human rights and biology & science. - Flexible purchasing options are available, - A unique historical perspective on research in these elds, including title-by-title licenses. The Brill Online Journal Collection offers access to Brill’s rich Brill has a long-term archivalwhich and benets preservation research agreementbeing carried out today. - Guarantees perpetual access to all the content 89 Literature and Cultural Studies journal content back to the year 2000, including the current with the Royal Dutch Library- Full-text (KB), search and with options Portico for the (USA).entire archive collection. in the Brill Journal Archives Online. year content. The collection gives access to over - Responsive design enables a positive user experience - No platform fees. on mobile devices. - Save shelf space on archival copies of relevant journals. 350 journals, 7,500 volumes and 150,000 articles. Features - Data feeds to all major discovery services are provided 93 Middle East & Islamic Studies The Brill Journal Online Collections are hosted on by Brill, which improve discoverability and usage. -
Automatic Detection of Image Manipulations in the Biomedical Literature Enrico M
Bucci Cell Death and Disease (2018) 9:400 DOI 10.1038/s41419-018-0430-3 Cell Death & Disease ARTICLE Open Access Automatic detection of image manipulations in the biomedical literature Enrico M. Bucci 1,2 Abstract Images in scientific papers are used to support the experimental description and the discussion of the findings since several centuries. In the field of biomedical sciences, in particular, the use of images to depict laboratory results is widely diffused, at such a level that one would not err in saying that there is barely any experimental paper devoid of images to document the attained results. With the advent of software for digital image manipulation, however, even photographic reproductions of experimental results may be easily altered by researchers, leading to an increasingly high rate of scientific papers containing unreliable images. In this paper I introduce a software pipeline to detect some of the most diffuse misbehaviours, running two independent tests on a random set of papers and on the full publishing record of a single journal. The results obtained by these two tests support the feasibility of the software approach and imply an alarming level of image manipulation in the published record. Introduction experiment became a method accessible to anyone; a In a set of drawings dating 13th March 1610 published method perceived to be as objective as any other experi- “ ” 1234567890():,; 1234567890():,; on the Sidereus Nuncius , Galileo represented the mental set-up, so that in many cases images produced by uneven curve of the sun’s light over the moon disc, as seen dedicated apparatuses became the results to be analyzed, only in January of the same year using his telescope1.