DOCSLIB.ORG

Ouachita River Basin : Main Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ouachita River Basin : Main Report Historic, Archive Document Do not assume content reflects current scientific knowledge, policies, or practices. MAIN REPORT\ I ) OUACHITA RIVER BASIN STUDY Reserve aTC4?5 r .08U5 ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA v ;Wm UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE ! > (V F .W ECONOMICS, STATISTICS, AND COOPERATIVES SERVICE V, FOREST SERVICE . \ AND SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE I AB-33 Bookplate <!-«*) NATIONAL MAIN REPORT o OUACHITA RIVER BASIN o U.S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURAL! RATIONAL AGRICULTURAL LIBRARY her Prepared by: mmvrnmm*, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE >•0 Soil Conservation Service <o Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service o Forest Service D Sponsored by: Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission Louisiana State Soil and Water Conservation Committee Louisiana Office of Public Works Alexandria, Louisiana January 1980 * if 1 74?999 OUACHITA RIVER BASIN STUDY Arkansas and Louisiana TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT E-l PREFACE PREFACE P-1 PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS INTRODUCTION 1-1 SUMMARY OF STUDY CONCERNS 1-1 FLOODING AND IMPAIRED DRAINAGE 1-5 WATER SUPPLY AND STORAGE 1-8 FOREST RESOURCES 1-8 RECREATION 1-9 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES AND ECOSYSTEMS 1-9 AREAS OF NATURAL BEAUTY 1-12 CULTURAL RESOURCES 1-13 LAND AND WATER QUALITY 1-14 RECOMMENDED PLAN INTRODUCTION II-l PLAN ELEMENTS II- PLAN EFFECTS 1 1 -7 SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTS - BENEFICIAL AND ADVERSE EFFECTS II-8 RELATIONSHIP TO LAND USE, PLANS, POLICIES, AND CONTROLS IN THE BASIN 11-13 SHORT-TERM VS. LONG-TERM USE OF RESOURCES 11-13 IRREVERSIBLE AND IRRETRIEVABLE COMMITMENTS 11-15 CHANGED RESOURCE USE 11-15 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT SUMMARY 11-17 COMPARISON WITH OTHER ALTERNATIVES 11-18 EARLY-ACTION USDA PROGRAM 11-20 OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPLEMENTATION INTRODUCTION III-l OPPORTUNITIES FOR USDA PROGRAMS III-l OPPORTUNITIES FOR NON-USDA PROGRAMS III-9 1 1 4 Table of Contents (Continued) ALTERNATIVE PLANS INTRODUCTION IV- FUTURE WITHOUT PLAN ALTERNATIVE IV- ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVE IV-3 ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ALTERNATIVE IV-9 EFFECTIVENESS OF ALTERNATIVE PLANS IV- 16 APPENDIX N umb e r TABLES E.l Subbasins of the Study Area E-3 E.2 Benefits and Costs of Recommended Plan E-6 E.3 Effects of Recommended Plan E-8 1.1 Summary of Net Needs By Concerns for 1970, 1990, 2020 1-1 II. 1 Effects of Recommended Plan 11-12 11. 2 Established Conservation Land Treatment Measures 1 1 - 1 11. 3 Effects of Recommended Plan Compared with Effects of Selected Alternatives 11-21 11. 4 Comparison of Average Annual Benefits and Costs of Recommended Plan and Selected Alternatives 11-21 111.1 Estimated Cost of Implementing Recommended Plan and Annual OM&R Costs 1 1 1 - 2 111. 2 Estimated Cost of Implementing USDA Program .... 1 1 1 — 8 IV. 1 Summary of Plan Elements for each Alternative IV-2 IV. 2 Proposed Early-Action Measures of ED Alternative IV-4 IV. 3 Estimated Costs of ED Alternative IV-6 IV. 4 Average Annual Monetary Benefits of ED Alternative IV-6 IV. 5 Elements and Costs of P.L.-566 and RC&D Projects Under ED Alternative . IV-7 IV. 6 Proposed Early-Action Measures of EQ Alternative . IV-10 IV. 7 Estimated Costs of EQ Alternative IV-12 2 f Table of Contents (Continued) IV. 8 Average Annual Monetary Benefits of EQ Alternative IV-12 IV. 9 Elements and Cost of P.L.-566 and RC&D Projects Under EQ Alternative IV-13 IV. 10 Effectiveness of ED and EQ Alternatives and . Recommended Plan IV-17 FIGURES 11.1 Map of Early-Action U.S.D.A. Watershed Projects . 11-22 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PURPOSE OF THE STUDY The ever-increasing demands of society and an expanding population results in heavy competition for the use of land and water resources. Previous general river basin studies indicated this was creating a need for the conservation, orderly development and utilization of land and water resources in the Ouachita River Basin. Consequently the states of Arkansas and Louisiana jointly determined further, more detailed study was needed. It was determined the study would consist of an appraisal of the adequacy of existing resources meeting current needs, the identification of problems and concerns, future trends, recommendations for solutions to land and water resource problems, and guidelines for future development of these resources. AUTHORITY FOR THE STUDY AND SPONSORS Authority for this study is contained in Section 6 of Public Law 566 as amended. Sponsors of the study are the Arkansas Soil and Water Conservation Commission; the Louisiana State Soil and Water Conservation Committee; and the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Office of Public Works. AGENCIES PARTICIPATING Agencies conducting the study include the Soil Conservation Service, the Forest Service, and the Economics, Statistics, and Cooperatives Service all of which are part of the U. S. Department of Agriculture with the SCS being the lead agency. The sponsoring agencies provided coordination to accomplish the study in their respective states. Federal cooperating agencies included the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers; the U. S. Geological Survey; the Bureau of Mines; the Bureau of Outdoor Recreation the Environmental Protection Agency; the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service; the National Weather Service; the U. S. Public Health Service; and the Federal Power Commission. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION Public meetings were held in Louisiana and Arkansas to inform the public of the study and obtain their views on problems, concerns, and desires regarding land and water resources. In addition to those attending meetings, local officials and interested citizens were sent questionnaires to identify specific problems and concerns. Federal, state, and local agencies provided input into the study through work groups and other means. Near the end of the study the sponsors held a public meeting for the purpose of presenting alternatives developed during the study and obtain their views and desires on what should constitute a Basin plan from the alternatives presented. EXPECTED USE OF THE STUDY This study is intended to provide direction in future land and water resources development planning in the Ouachita River Basin by providing information on existing resources, resource limitations, future need and demands, and recommendations for alleviating problems, meeting needs, and the extent to which assistance can be provided under USDA programs. • It would also indicate remaining needs and concerns that would require solutions under state and local programs. DESCRIPTION OF STUDY AREA The study area includes the entire Ouachita River Basin within the Lower Mississippi Water Resource Region and a portion of the Red River Basin in Rapides and Avoyelles Parishes. This covers about 25,900 square miles in the southern half of Arkansas and the northeast quadrant of Louisiana. The Ouachita River originates in the Ouachita Mountains of west central Arkansas and outlets into the Black River in central Louisiana, which in turn empties into the Red River in Avoyelles Parish in east central Louisiana. The drainage area consists of approximately 3,500 square miles of the Ouachita Mountains in Arkansas; 15,000 square miles of hilly uplands in Arkansas and Louisiana; and 7,400 square miles of flat, alluvial areas in Arkansas and Louisiana. See table E.l for the Basin area by subbasins and the acreage of each. PROBLEMS AND CONCERNS Problems and concerns related to land and water resources within the Ouachita River Basin were identified by the study. Approximately 25 percent of the Basin, or 4,158,000 acres, are subject to flooding and impaired drainage. This causes significant economic losses and damages to agriculture on 1,574,000 acres and to urban areas covering about 1000 acres. The remaining 2,583,000 acres are in forest land where it is not a tangible problem. Of the 1,575,000 acres of problem area, 315,000 acres of cropland and pasture and 1000 acres of urban land are in the upland areas where only flooding is a problem. The remaining 1,259,000 acres are cropland and pasture in the flatland areas where flooding and impaired drainage are an inseparable problem. Under existing conditions, losses and damages average $34,122,000, per year. This includes $29,186,000 of agricultural losses; $227,000- of urban damages; $1,607,000 to roads, bridges, railroads and miscellaneous items; and $3,102,000 of indirect damages. It is estimated that total annual losses will increase to $58,127,000 by 1990 and to $82,714,000 by 2020 . y This does not include damages to Monroe and West Monroe which is under study by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. £-2 Table E.l - Subbasins of the Study Area Ouachita River Basin Subbasin State Acreage Little Missouri Arkansas 1,332,200 Saline River Arkansas 1,853,100 Ouachita River Arkansas and 4,486,200 (Upper reaches) Louisiana Bayou Bartholomew Arkansas and 991,300 Louisiana Boeuf River Arkansas and 1,568,500 Louisiana Cornie Bayou Arkansas and 573,200 Louisiana Bayou Macon Arkansas and 363,700 Louisiana Boeuf River and Bayou Bartholomew Louisiana 157,500 Boeuf River, Tensas River and Bayou Macon Louisiana 196,000 Bayou Macon and Boeuf River Louisiana 248,900 Bayou Macon and Tensas River Louisiana 328,000 Tensas River Louisiana 645,300 Bayou D'Arbonne Louisiana 738,500 Dugdemona River Louisiana 591,700 Castor Creek Louisiana 599,100 Little River Louisiana 677,000 Red River Tributaries Louisiana 625,600 Bayou Cocodrie Louisiana 379,200 Batture Land 221,000 TOTAL ACRES 16,576,000 (Square Miles = 25,900) £-3 . Other problems and concerns include indicated increased needs of 114 mgd by 1990 and 273 mgd by 2020 for agricultural water supply. The existing need for an additional development of 345,000 acres of water surface for fishing, boating, and skiing is expected to increase about 20 percent by 1990.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aquatic Fish Report
    Aquatic Fish Report Acipenser fulvescens Lake St urgeon Class: Actinopterygii Order: Acipenseriformes Family: Acipenseridae Priority Score: 27 out of 100 Population Trend: Unknown Gobal Rank: G3G4 — Vulnerable (uncertain rank) State Rank: S2 — Imperiled in Arkansas Distribution Occurrence Records Ecoregions where the species occurs: Ozark Highlands Boston Mountains Ouachita Mountains Arkansas Valley South Central Plains Mississippi Alluvial Plain Mississippi Valley Loess Plains Acipenser fulvescens Lake Sturgeon 362 Aquatic Fish Report Ecobasins Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - Arkansas River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - St. Francis River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain - White River Mississippi River Alluvial Plain (Lake Chicot) - Mississippi River Habitats Weight Natural Littoral: - Large Suitable Natural Pool: - Medium - Large Optimal Natural Shoal: - Medium - Large Obligate Problems Faced Threat: Biological alteration Source: Commercial harvest Threat: Biological alteration Source: Exotic species Threat: Biological alteration Source: Incidental take Threat: Habitat destruction Source: Channel alteration Threat: Hydrological alteration Source: Dam Data Gaps/Research Needs Continue to track incidental catches. Conservation Actions Importance Category Restore fish passage in dammed rivers. High Habitat Restoration/Improvement Restrict commercial harvest (Mississippi River High Population Management closed to harvest). Monitoring Strategies Monitor population distribution and abundance in large river faunal surveys in cooperation
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain
    92° 91° 90° 89° 88° Ecoregions of the Mississippi Alluvial Plain Cape Girardeau 73cc 72 io Ri Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of This level III and IV ecoregion map was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and Literature Cited: PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Shannen S. Chapman (Dynamac Corporation), Oh ver environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map Barbara A. Kleiss (USACE, ERDC -Waterways Experiment Station), James M. ILLINOIS assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing 2003, Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative effort primarily between USEPA Region Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map) (supplementary supplement): Annals of the Association of American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, Omernik, (USEPA, retired), Thomas L. Foti (Arkansas Natural Heritage p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. 71 the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the VII, USEPA National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H., and Commission), and Elizabeth O. Murray (Arkansas Multi-Agency Wetland Bailey, R.G.): Washington, D.C., U.S. Department of Agriculture - Forest Planning Team). 37° environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999).
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003
    Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment December 2003 Ouachita Ecoregional Assessment Team Arkansas Field Office 601 North University Ave. Little Rock, AR 72205 Oklahoma Field Office 2727 East 21st Street Tulsa, OK 74114 Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment ii 12/2003 Table of Contents Ouachita Mountains Ecoregional Assessment............................................................................................................................i Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................................................................iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................1 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................................3 BACKGROUND ...........................................................................................................................4 Ecoregional Boundary Delineation.............................................................................................................................................4 Geology..........................................................................................................................................................................................5 Soils................................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating a Caddo Mound Site in the Ouachita River Valley
    Volume 2021 Article 5 2021 Investigating a Caddo Mound Site in the Ouachita River Valley Mary Beth Trubitt Arkansas Archeological Survey Jami J. Lockhart Arkansas Archeological Survey Vanessa N. Hanvey Kentucky Heritage Council Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita Part of the American Material Culture Commons, Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Environmental Studies Commons, Other American Studies Commons, Other Arts and Humanities Commons, Other History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons, and the United States History Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Cite this Record Trubitt, Mary Beth; Lockhart, Jami J.; and Hanvey, Vanessa N. (2021) "Investigating a Caddo Mound Site in the Ouachita River Valley," Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: Vol. 2021, Article 5. ISSN: 2475-9333 Available at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Center for Regional Heritage Research at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State by an authorized editor of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Investigating a Caddo Mound Site in the Ouachita River Valley Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This article is available in Index of Texas Archaeology: Open Access Gray Literature from the Lone Star State: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/ita/vol2021/iss1/5 Investigating a Caddo Mound Site in the Ouachita River Valley Mary Beth Trubitt1, Jami J.
    [Show full text]
  • Alligator Gar Ouachita River
    Life History Study of the Alligator Gar in the Ouachita River, Arkansas Summary: Current information indicates that a breeding population of alligator gar may inhabit the lower Ouachita River in Arkansas. Extensive sampling by Layher since 1998 on Arkansas’ large rivers has yielded only one juvenile alligator gar which occurred in a tributary of the Ouachita River below Felsenthal Lock and Dam. This proposal addresses the documentation of such a population in the lower Ouachita River. William G. Layher, Ph.D. President Layher BioLogics RTEC, Inc. 7233 Camden Cutoff Road Pine Bluff, Arkansas 71603 [email protected] phone/fax: 870-879-4808 mobile: 870-672-8689 Requested amount: $50,000 Match Provided: $50,000 (Layher BioLogics) The alligator gar was quite common in Arkansas and other southeastern states as well as Texas through the first one-half of the twentieth century. Populations were used extensively in Arkansas for sportfishing as well as commercial fishing. Declines in populations became noticeable in the White and St. Francis Rivers of Arkansas by the mid – 1950’s. In recent years, most alligator gar captured in Arkansas have been large adult specimens harvested by bow-fishermen. Few specimens have been reported being collected by commercial fishermen or scientific collectors and investigators. Recent surveys of Arkansas’ large rivers by Layher et al. produced only four alligator gar despite several years of intensive sampling on the Red, White, Ouachita, Arkansas, and St. Francis Rivers. The status of alligator gar in other states also appears to be one of decline. Reasons for this decline are currently unknown. This past summer of 2006 yielded one juvenile alligator gar caught in a hoop net in a tributary of the Ouachita River in Arkansas (Layher 2006).
    [Show full text]
  • Desk Reference 1 (Recovered)
    200 YEARS IN THE MAKING Discover Louisiana: 7 Geographic Regions L ouisiana’s geographic regions and diverse environments affect where and how people live. Used with permission, Geology.com ACTIVITY: LOUISIANA RIVERS Overview Students use research links and the Louisiana Waterways map on page ninety-five to label Louisiana rivers. Consider Louisiana has almost 5,000 miles of navigable rivers, bayous, creeks, and canals. How do Louisiana’s waterways affect the way people live? LESSON: LOUISIANA’S GEOGRAPHIC REGIONS MAP GLEs— Grade Eight: 2, 3, Overview Natural regions are defined and classified according to relief, soil, vegetation, and climate. Louisiana can be divided into three natural, or geographic, regions (and additional sub-regions). Students will explore Louisiana’s geographic regions, using the student instructions sheet on page ninety-six and the map on page ninety-seven to record their information. Student Project Students will work with their team to explore life in one of Louisiana’s geographic regions, preparing a presentation to share with their peers. Students will use the completed Geographic Regions map and chart and the Office of Tourism’s Louisiana Destinations site, http://www.louisianatravel.com/ destinations, to explore how Louisiana’s geography affects life in their selected region. 94 DCRT Education, www.crt.state.la.us/education LOUISIANA WATERWAYS Student Worksheet Name ___________________________________ Louisiana has almost 5,000 miles of navigable rivers, bayous, creeks, and canals. Directions Use the Internet sites below to locate the following waterways and label them on the map provided. Prepare a key, or legend, that identifies the symbols you use. Louisiana Map Database: http://geology.com/state-map/louisiana.shtml Google Maps: http://maps.google.com/ MAP EXTENSION 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Pottery of the Caddo Indians Wendy Bradley Richter Arkansas State Archives, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Ouachita Baptist University Ouachita Baptist University Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita Articles Faculty Publications 2016 Pottery of the Caddo Indians Wendy Bradley Richter Arkansas State Archives, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/articles Part of the Public History Commons Recommended Citation Richter, Wendy Bradley, "Pottery of the Caddo Indians" (2016). Articles. 214. https://scholarlycommons.obu.edu/articles/214 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons @ Ouachita. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pottery of the Caddo Indians For thousands of years, the land that is now known as Arkansas has been inhabited by native peoples. For much of that time, the Ouachita River valley and much of southwest Arkansas was home to the Caddo Indians and their ancestors. Archeologists are able to glean a great deal of information about Arkansas’s first people by studying their pottery. According to the Arkansas Archeological Survey, pottery can tell us much about the “material, religious, and intellectual life of past societies and their social interactions such as settlements, trade, and conquests.” Extensive archeological remains exist in the upper Ouachita River valley: almost every field bordering on the river contains evidence of Indian presence in the area. Mounds and campsites all along the Ouachita River and its tributaries attracted archeologists and artifact collectors for years.
    [Show full text]
  • Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas
    Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission Floods of May 1968 in South Arkansas By R. C. GILSTRAP FLOODS OF 1968 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1970-A Prepared in cooperation with the Arkansas State Highway Commission u. s. s. s. WATER RESOURCES DIVISION ROLL A, MO. RECEIVED APR 101972 AM PM 7|8|9|10|ll|12[li2i3i4i5|6 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY V. E. McKelvey, Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 76-185107 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price $1 (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1214 CONTENTS Page Abstract................................................................................................................................... Al Introduction.................................................................. ....................................................... 1 Acknowledgments................................................................................................................ 3 Definitions of terms and abbreviations...... .......... ........................................................... 3 Precipitation.................. .................................................................................................... 4 Floods..............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Indian History in the Lake Ouachita Region
    Indian History in the Lake Ouachita Region Mary Beth Trubitt, Ph.D. (Arkansas Archeological Survey) ake Ouachita was created with the construction of Blakely Mountain Dam by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 1953. The lake, designed for flood control, hydroelectric power, recreation, and wildlife man- agement,L covers about 40,000 acres in Garland and Montgomery counties. Before the lake, rural communities such as Buckville, Avant, and Cedar Glades developed in the Ouachita River valley between the 1880s and 1950. There are traces of still older communities beneath the waters of Lake Ouachita, places where Indians lived dur- ing the past 13,500 years. We can learn about this Indian history from oral traditions, from written accounts left by explorers, and from archeology. Field profile of Adair mound, showing burned floors and building posts (University of Arkansas Museum). Caddo Indians in the Ouachita Mountains a creek in eastern Oklahoma). These people were probably In the late 1600s and early 1700s, Spanish missionar- ancestral to the Caddo Indians that lived in the Ouachita ies and French traders met Caddo Indians living in the Red Mountains in later centuries. As seen from the Poole site, River valley in what is now Arkansas, Texas, Oklahoma, excavated by WPA crews prior to the construction of Lake and Louisiana. When settlers reached the Ouachita River Ouachita, Fourche Maline communities made and used in the early 1800s, there were no Indians living in the valley. pottery, and chipped dart points and other tools from lo- Caddos were farmers. According to oral tradition, the cally available stone.
    [Show full text]
  • OUACHITA RIVER BRIDGE BAER No. IA-20* SPANNING the OUACHITA RIVER Sterlington Ouachita Parish Louisiana
    OUACHITA RIVER BRIDGE BAER No. IA-20* SPANNING THE OUACHITA RIVER Sterlington Ouachita Parish Louisiana PHOTOGRAPHS WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD SOUTHEAST REGIONAL OFFICE National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 100 Alabama Street, SW Atlanta, Georgia 30303 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD OUACHITA RIVER BRIDGE HAER No. LA-20 Location: Louisiana Highway 2, spanning the Ouachita River Sterlington , Ouachita and Union Parishes, Louisiana The bridge is located at latitude: 32.696169, longitude: -92.086885. The coordinate was obtained from Google Earth on 14 September 2011. The location has no restriction on its release to the public. Date of Construction: Construction Span: (Late 1931 through mid 1932). Completed in 1932. Engineer: J.B. Carter employed with Nashville Bridge Company of Nashville, Tennessee and Bessemer, Alabama. Builder: Nashville Bridge Company Present Owner: State of Louisiana Present Use: Vehicular Bridge Significance: The Ouachita River Bridge at Sterlington was one of eight bridges to be built as part of the highway improvement plan of Governor Huey P. Long in 1928. In 1929, the Louisiana Highway Commission began preliminary plans for eight highway toll bridges. One of them was to be built at Sterlington to cross the Ouachita River. After problems with the way the bond issue was drawn, Governor Long negotiated a plan with the Nashville Bridge Company to build the eight bridges as a package deal for six million dollars. Report Prepared By: Coco & Company, Wayne Lawrence Coco, AIA, Architect, LLC P.O. Box 111 or 510 Main St. Simmesport, Louisiana 71369 Date: March 22. 2010 Ouachita River Bridge HAER LA-20 (Page 2) HISTORICAL BACKGROUND History of the Sterlington Community Historians credit the founding of Sterlington by two Tennessee brothers, John T.
    [Show full text]
  • Ouachita National Forest Ouachita River Float Trip
    Ouachita National Forest SOUTHERN REGION NATIONAL FORESTS Arkansas - Oklahoma The U.S. Department of Canoeing Fishing Camping Swimming Ouachita River Float Trip Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its A River Adventure: Practice Water Safety: programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national Canoeing the Ouachita River at any time of the year offers visitors a · Wear life jackets and never float alone. origin, age, disability, glimpse of the forest some never see. The pleasant temperatures and brilliant · Check weather forecast and water conditions. and where applicable, sex, seasonal color displays of fall and spring, the cooling and refreshing effect · Be careful not to overload the canoe.Carry an marital status, familial status, of moving water and shade trees during the heat of summer, make April to extra paddle. parental status, religion, October the most popular times to enjoy this trip. The family-friendly river · Use extreme caution after heavy rains or sexual orientation, genetic flows casually past massive rock bluffs shaded by tree-lined banks and slopes. during high water periods. information, political beliefs, Paddle or just float as the river alternates between trickling rapids and clear, · Examine all rapids closely. Carry canoes over reprisal, or because all or a slow moving pools. In this picturesque setting, visitors can enjoy fishing, low water bridges and obstructions. OUACHITA part of an individual's income camping, picnicking, bird watching, and swimming. · Watch for submerged logs and rocks. is derived from any public Things To Remember: Floating speed on the river averages about 1 mile per hour, varying assistance program.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Regional Context
    4.0 Regional Context 4.1 Geographic Setting The State of Louisiana is divided into three geographic land areas: East Gulf Coastal Plain, Mississippi Alluvial Plain, and West Gulf Coastal Plain. These geographic areas are defined in relation to proximity to the Mississippi River and the Gulf of Mexico. Louisiana’s position, astride the great delta of the Mississippi River at the southern end of the Mississippi embayment, is such that virtually all of the state’s surface deposits and landforms reflect deposition of this relatively young material by the river and by a number of important coastal plain streams.5 Figure 4-1 Monroe in Regional Context The City of Monroe is situated in the northeast portion of Louisiana within the Mississippi Alluvial Plain6. This area begins in Arkansas in the north and extends to the Gulf of Mexico in the south paralleling the Mississippi. The area immediately adjacent to the river is characterized by ridges and hollows while the fielded area situated on top of the ridges along the river are referred to as the "front lands"7. The City of Monroe is characterized by near level topography given its location entirely within a floodplain. The Ouachita River and its 11,000 square mile basin constitute this floodplain. Source: peter j. smith & company, inc. Of the approximately 20,000 acres of land that constitute Monroe, 70% exists within the 500- year floodplain. The remaining approximate 30% of the City land area lies within the 100-year floodplain. The majority of the areas that are within the 100-year floodplain are near the Ouachita River and Bayou DeSiard.
    [Show full text]