DOCSLIB.ORG

Israel and the Middle East News Update

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Israel and the Middle East News Update Thursday, February 9 Headlines: Iron Dome Intercepts Three Rockets Fired at Eilat Likud Effort to Disavow Two-State Solution FM Attempting to Mitigate Damage from Legalization Law Abbas Calls on World Nations to Recognize Palestine, Save 2SS Trump's Israel Amb. Linked to Expansion of New WB Settlement Turfed Out Amona Residents Choose New Outpost to Call Home Russia Promises to Keep Weapons Out of Hezbollah’s Hands Ignoring White House Warnings, Iran Test-Fires Another Missile Commentary: TOI: “The True Significance of Israel’s Settlement Legalization Law” By Haviv Rettig Gur, Senior Analyst, Times of Israel Al-Monitor: “Who Profits from Gaza Unrest?” By Ben Caspit, Israel Pulse Columnist, Al-Monitor S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 www.centerpeace.org ● Yoni Komorov, Editor ● David Abreu, Associate Editor News Excerpts February 9, 2017 BICOM Iron Dome Intercepts Three Rockets Fired at Eilat Rockets fired from Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula at the Israeli city of Eilat were intercepted last night by the Iron Dome anti-missile system. Early rocket warning sirens were sounded in Eilat, Israel’s southernmost city, just before 11pm local time. Three rockets were successfully intercepted by the Iron Dome, while a fourth landed in an open area, causing no damage. Nobody was injured in the attack, but several Eilat residents were taken to hospital suffering from shock or anxiety. Rocket fragments were later found scattered in the city. See also, “ISIS Claims Responsibility for Eilat Rockets” (Ynet News) Ma’ariv Likud Effort to Disavow Two-State Solution Encouraged by their success in getting the legalization bill passed into law, some in the Likud have no intention of resting on their laurels. Likud members now want to “shackle” Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu from the right in advance of his scheduled meeting with US President Donald Trump and to demand that he refrain from voicing support for the two-state solution, in a departure from his past statements. A group of Likud members—heads of local authorities, branches and party activists—have scheduled an emergency meeting in the Knesset in which they will call on him to “disavow” the two-state solution. The conference was organized by two Likud Central Committee members from Judea and Samaria, Shevah Stern and Natan Engelsman. See also, “EU Envoy Complains: Israel Merely Paying Lip Service to Two-State Solution” (Times of Israel) Ma’ariv FM Attempting to Mitigate Damage from Legalization Law An official document from the Foreign Ministry, authorized by Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu, attempts to rebuff global criticism of the legalization law by emphasizing that it is possible the law may be disqualified by the Supreme Court. The document was disseminated by the Foreign Ministry’s Media and Public Affairs Division to Israeli missions around the world to enable them to explain the law and its background. The document covers eight points. The last section states that every law passed by the Knesset can be re-examined by the Supreme Court. Ha’aretz Abbas Calls on World Nations to Recognize Palestine, Save 2SS PA Mahmoud Abbas called on world nations to officially recognize the state of Palestinian as soon as possible to help save the two-state solution. Abbas, speaking from Paris, told members of the French parliament the two-state solution requires countries who recognize Israel to also recognize Palestine. Dozens of countries recognized Palestinian statehood years ago and recently Palestine was recognized by the Vatican. Most West European and North American countries never did do, albeit most of their lawmakers had supported recognizing Palestine within the 1967 borders. See also, “Israeli Ambassador Warns: Ireland Soon to Recognize Palestine” (Ha'aretz) 2 Ha’aretz Trump's Israel Amb. Linked to Expansion of New WB Settlement An organization headed by David Friedman, the U.S. ambassador-designate to Israel, is behind a new construction project in the West Bank settlement of Beit El recently approved by the government. The project includes a five-story building – part of which has already been constructed illegally on private Palestinian land and will be retroactively legalized – and 20 housing units, according to the Peace Now Settlement Watch project. It is being funding by American Friends of Beit El Institutions, which raises several million dollars a year for this particular settlement. See also, “Newly Approved Settler Homes Financed by Trump's Envoy Israel Pick” (Times of Israel) Times of Israel Turfed Out Amona Residents Choose New Outpost to Call Home The residents of the Amona settlement outpost in the West Bank, who were recently evacuated from their homes in compliance with a court-ordered demolition of the site, have chosen another similarly unauthorized outpost as the location where they want to reestablish their new community. During a Wednesday night meeting, the residents decided by a majority vote that they will move to the Geulat Tzion unauthorized outpost, located in the Shiloh settlement bloc. While Amona was built on privately owned Palestinian land, Geulat Tzion lies on a state-owned tract. Ynet News Russia Promises to Keep Weapons Out of Hezbollah’s Hands Russian Ambassador to Israel, Alexander Shane, said that his country is working to prevent the transfer of Russian weapons to Hezbollah. During an interview with the Interfax news agency, Shane noted that Israel presented Moscow with its "red lines" and shared concerns about Russia's cooperation with Iran and Syria. According to Shane, Israel presented red lines to the Russians about events in Syria, the most important of which were the transfer of modern, advanced weapons to Hezbollah and the establishment of an anti-Israel base with Iran in the Syrian Golan. Shane added that Israel understands was his country is doing in Syria, "but for them, the best thing that can happen is cooperation between Russia and the United States—and not Russia and Iran—to solve the crisis in Syria and the fight against terrorism in the Middle East." Jerusalem Post Ignoring White House Warnings, Iran Test-Fires Another Missile Iran test-fired another surface to air missile Wednesday. The test, just as the last, occurred outside Semnan, about 140 miles east of Tehran. The test comes the same day the White House announced it is considering a proposal that could lead to potentially designating Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) as a terrorist organization, according to US officials familiar with the matter. The officials said that several US government agencies have been consulted about such a proposal, which if implemented would add to measures the United States has already imposed on individuals and entities linked to the IRGC. The Trump administration sent a stark message to Tehran last week over their continued missile tests and support for proxy militia groups battling Saudi Arabian forces. See also, “Iran Defies Trump’s Warnings, Conducts Missile Test” (Arutz Sheva) 3 Times of Israel – February 7, 2017 The True Significance of Israel’s Settlement Legalization Law The flurry of hand-wringing over the Regulation Law has largely missed what may be its most dramatic consequence — that it makes it harder for Israel to stick to its longstanding policy of permanent indecision in the West Bank. By Haviv Rettig Gur, Senior Analyst for the Times of Israel Criticism of the Regulation Law that passed Monday in the Knesset has been visceral and widespread. It comes from Israeli politicians on the right, as well as on the deepest left; from pro-Israel advocates, and from Palestinian officials; from Israel’s own attorney general, as well as European and Muslim-world governments; and even from some Knesset members who actually voted for it. All seem to believe the law, which authorizes retroactively Israeli settlement homes built illegally on privately owned Palestinian land, is a watershed moment in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. But with so many voices vying to explain precisely why it is so bad, it can be easy to miss, or to misunderstand, the indigenous Israeli political impulses that forged it, and thus to misrepresent what it means for Israel’s presence in the West Bank. In an important sense, the Regulation Law changes very little. Under Jordanian land law that still applies in the West Bank – Israel never applied its own civil law, and so the territory is run under a combination of various legal systems imposed by past rulers and IDF orders issued since 1967 – the governing authority in the territory is already permitted to seize privately owned land for public benefit. The Jordanian law is far more expansive and permissive as to what constitutes “public benefit” than is Israeli civil law within Israel’s borders, and more even than what Israel’s military administration has actually done in the West Bank. And so the new Regulation Law does not, as often claimed, suddenly allow the Civil Administration, the Israeli agency administering the West Bank under the army’s auspices, to seize private property for Israeli settlements. The Civil Administration is already allowed to do so, at least on paper (and leaving out for the moment the rather significant question of international law and its obligations). Rather, the Regulation Law requires that it do so. In places where Israelis built settlements on privately held Palestinian property in good faith – i.e., without knowing it was privately owned – or received the government’s de facto consent for squatting there, the Civil Administration is now forced to carry out the seizure in the squatters’ name in exchange for state compensation to the owners equal to 20 years’ rent or 125 percent of the assessed value of the land.
Recommended publications
  • As Israel's Political Parties Fight for Role of Kingmaker, Religious

    As Israel's Political Parties Fight for Role of Kingmaker, Religious

    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 8 1 Volume 2 1 , Number 1 2 Parshas Vayikra March 20 , 20 2 1 As Israel’s Political Parties Fight for Role of Kingmaker, Religious - Secular Divide Comes to the Fore By Haviv Rettig Gur timesofisrael.com March 15, 2021 Two very different parties have found in each other lawmakers and some Haredi party activists sharing p hotos the perfect enemies. of emaciated bodies being carried on wheelbarrows during Eight days to election day, the race between the pro - the Holocaust. and anti - Netanyahu camps is close. So close, in fact, that The video clip of that line went viral on Hebrew - neither side can hope to piece together an effective language social media. Few noticed the exchange that government. followed, in which Liberman went on to explain If Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu manages to something important about his campaign strategy — he eke out a slim majority, it will likely b e so slim that he will needs to boost support by driving secular voters to the find himself forced to cater to the whims of the most polls. right - wing lawmakers on the ballot. Netanyahu’s Challenged again by Asayag that he cannot push both opponents, meanwhile, theoretically led by Yair Lapid of Netanyahu and the Haredi parties out of government Yesh Atid, may well be too divided and diverse to produce simultaneously and will end up “hugging [Shas leader a manageable coa lition.
  • The Emergency Powers \(Detention\) Law – 1979

    The Emergency Powers \(Detention\) Law – 1979

    UN Human Rights Committee – Information Sheet # 1 State of Emergency 22 July 2003 ICCPR, Article 4 - State of Emergency and Derogation from International Standards List of Issues, Question 2: To what extent is Israel derogating from the provisions of the Covenant, basing itself on a state of emergency notified upon ratification of the Covenant? In light of the Concluding Observations by the Committee (CCPR/C/79/Add.93) and General comment No. 29 (HRI/GEN/1/Rev.5/Add.1), please provide detailed information on restrictions or derogations made by Israel in practice in respect of all the articles of the Covenant, explaining their compatibility with the Covenant. Israel’s Reservation to the ICCPR, 3 October 1991 - “Since its establishment, the State of Israel has been the victim of continuous threats and attacks on its very existence as well as on the life and property of its citizens. These have taken the form of threats of war, of actual armed attacks, and campaigns of terrorism resulting in the murder of and injury to human beings. In view of the above, the State of Emergency which was proclaimed in May 1948 has remained in force ever since. This situation constitutes a public emergency within the meaning of article 4 (1) of the Covenant. The Government of Israel has therefore found it necessary, in accordance with the said article 4, to take measures to the extent strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, for the defense of the State and for the protection of life and property, including the exercise of powers of arrest and detention.
  • Hamas Attack on Israel Aims to Capitalize on Palestinian

    Hamas Attack on Israel Aims to Capitalize on Palestinian

    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 8 7 Volume 2 1 , Number 1 9 Parshias Bamidbar | 48th Day Omer May 1 5 , 2021 Hamas Attack on Israel Aims to Capitalize on Palestinian Frustration By Dov Lieber and Felicia Schwartz wsj.com May 12, 2021 It is not that the police caused the uptick in violence, forces by Monday evening from Shei kh Jarrah. The but they certainly ran headfirst, full - speed, guns forces were there as part of security measures surrounding blazing into the trap that was set for them. the nightly protests. When the secretive military chief of the Palestinian As the deadline passed, the group sent the barrage of Islamist movement Hamas emerged from the shadows last rockets toward Jerusalem, precipitating the Israeli week, he chose to weigh in on a land dispute in East response. Jerusalem, threatening to retaliate against Israel if Israeli strikes and Hamas rocket fire have k illed 56 Palestinian residents there were evicted from their homes. Palestinians, including 14 children, and seven Israelis, “If the aggression against our people…doesn’ t stop including one child, according to Palestinian and Israeli immediately,” warned the commander, Mohammad Deif, officials. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel “the enemy will pay an expensive price.” has killed dozens of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad Hamas followed through on the threat, firing from the operatives. Gaza Strip, which it governs, over a thousand rockets at Althou gh the Palestinian youth have lacked a single Israel since Monday evening.
  • An Idiot's Guide to the Nation-‐State Controversy

    An Idiot's Guide to the Nation-‐State Controversy

    An idiot’s guide to the nation-state controversy A bird’s-eye view of the facts, arguments and motivations behind the proposed legislation that is roiling Israeli politics The Times of Israel By Haviv Rettig Gur December 1, 2014 So much has been written about the nation-state bills, and so much of it has been wrong on the basic facts, that a straightforward primer on the existing versions and a brief sketch of the arguments around them may provide readers with basic tools to grapple with the issue. A government-sponsored bill is currently being written at the direction of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and under the supervision of Attorney General Yehudah Weinstein. Contrary to reports in both Israeli and foreign media, from a New York Times editorial to the world’s largest wire services, the cabinet did not pass a nation-state bill two weeks ago. Rather, it passed a 13-page decision that committed the government to supporting two right-wing versions of the nation-state bill in a preliminary vote in the Knesset, “but only,” the cabinet decision reads, “on condition that the proponents [of the two bills] agree that their bills will be attached [Israeli legislative terminology for ‘subsumed’] in a government-sponsored bill that will be proposed by the prime minister on the matter, which will be drafted on the basis of the principles contained in the appendix to this decision, and which will be adapted to it [the government bill].” Much of what has been said about the nation-state bill — that it “narrows” Israel’s democracy, that it changes the formal legal standing of Israel’s minorities — referred to the right-wing bills superseded by the government decision.
  • A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH

    A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH

    HUMAN RIGHTS A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Map .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions of Apartheid and Persecution .................................................................................
  • Israel - Wikipedia Page 1 of 97

    Israel - Wikipedia Page 1 of 97

    Israel - Wikipedia Page 1 of 97 Coordinates: 31°N 35°E Israel :Arabic ; �י �� �� �אל :Israel (/ˈɪzriəl, ˈɪzreɪəl/; Hebrew formally known as the State of Israel Israel ,( � � ��ا �يل (Hebrew) לארשי Medinat Yisra'el), is a �מ ��י �נת �י �� �� �אל :Hebrew) country in Western Asia, located on the (Arabic) ليئارسإ southeastern shore of the Mediterranean Sea and the northern shore of the Red Sea. It has land borders with Lebanon to the north, Syria to the northeast, Jordan on the east, the Palestinian territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip[20] to the east and west, respectively, and Egypt to the southwest. The country contains geographically diverse features within its relatively small Flag Emblem area.[21][22] Israel's economic and technological Anthem: "Hatikvah" (English: "The Hope") center is Tel Aviv,[23] while its seat of government and proclaimed capital is Jerusalem, although the state's sovereignty over Jerusalem has only partial recognition.[24][25][26][27][fn 4] Israel has evidence of the earliest migration of hominids out of Africa.[28] Canaanite tribes are archaeologically attested since the Middle Bronze Age,[29][30] while the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah emerged during the Iron Age.[31][32] The Neo-Assyrian Empire destroyed Israel around 720 BCE.[33] Judah was later conquered by the Babylonian, Persian and Hellenistic empires and had existed as Jewish autonomous provinces.[34][35] The successful Maccabean Revolt led to an independent Hasmonean kingdom by 110 BCE,[36] which in 63 BCE however became a client state of the Roman Republic that subsequently installed the Herodian dynasty in 37 BCE, and in 6 CE created the Roman province of Judea.[37] Judea lasted as a Roman province until the failed Jewish revolts resulted in widespread destruction,[36] the expulsion of the Jewish population[36][38] and the renaming of the region from Iudaea to Syria Palaestina.[39] Jewish presence in the region has persisted to a certain extent over the centuries.
  • 2014 Gaza War Assessment: the New Face of Conflict

    2014 Gaza War Assessment: the New Face of Conflict

    2014 Gaza War Assessment: The New Face of Conflict A report by the JINSA-commissioned Gaza Conflict Task Force March 2015 — Task Force Members, Advisors, and JINSA Staff — Task Force Members* General Charles Wald, USAF (ret.), Task Force Chair Former Deputy Commander of United States European Command Lieutenant General William B. Caldwell IV, USA (ret.) Former Commander, U.S. Army North Lieutenant General Richard Natonski, USMC (ret.) Former Commander of U.S. Marine Corps Forces Command Major General Rick Devereaux, USAF (ret.) Former Director of Operational Planning, Policy, and Strategy - Headquarters Air Force Major General Mike Jones, USA (ret.) Former Chief of Staff, U.S. Central Command * Previous organizational affiliation shown for identification purposes only; no endorsement by the organization implied. Advisors Professor Eliot Cohen Professor of Strategic Studies, Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies, Johns Hopkins University Lieutenant Colonel Geoffrey Corn, USA (ret.) Presidential Research Professor of Law, South Texas College of Law, Houston JINSA Staff Dr. Michael Makovsky Chief Executive Officer Dr. Benjamin Runkle Director of Programs Jonathan Ruhe Associate Director, Gemunder Center for Defense and Strategy Maayan Roitfarb Programs Associate Ashton Kunkle Gemunder Center Research Assistant . — Table of Contents — 2014 GAZA WAR ASSESSMENT: Executive Summary I. Introduction 7 II. Overview of 2014 Gaza War 8 A. Background B. Causes of Conflict C. Strategies and Concepts of Operations D. Summary of Events
  • Schlaglicht Israel Nr

    Schlaglicht Israel Nr

    Schlaglicht Israel Nr. 11/16 Aktuelles aus israelischen Tageszeitungen 1.-15. Juni Die Themen dieser Ausgabe 1. Attentat in Orlando ........................................................................................................................................... 1 2. Vier Tote bei Terroranschlag in Tel Aviv ............................................................................................................ 2 3. Erweiterte Koalition und Friedensgespräche ................................................................................................... 4 4. Medienquerschnitt ............................................................................................................................................ 6 1. Attentat in Orlando rather than a gay club, as did his terrorist colleagues Die Schüsse im Homosexuellenclub von Orlando who slaughtered innocent revelers at the Bataclan in lassen Erinnerungen erwachen an das Attentat Paris. (…) from the perspective of the Islamic State Ende letzten Jahres im Pariser Bataclan. Ahnungs- (…), Paris with its cultural and entertainment institu- los drängeln sich die Menschen vor einer Bühne, als tions is as filthy as Orlando with its amusement die ersten Schüsse fallen, die sie als Teil der Show parks and LGBT life. (…) Many people visiting LGBT missinterpretieren, bevor sie sich der Gefahr be- venues like Pulse see them as a kind of refuge, a wusst werden. Zunächst unklar blieb, ob Omar Ma- safe space. They go there to be who they are, free teen, der Mann, der 49 Menschen in
  • De Facto and De Jure Annexation: a Relevant Distinction in International Law? Israel and Area C: a Case Study

    De Facto and De Jure Annexation: a Relevant Distinction in International Law? Israel and Area C: a Case Study

    FREE UNIVERSITY OF BRUSSELS European Master’s Degree in Human Rights and Democratisation A.Y. 2018/2019 De facto and de jure annexation: a relevant distinction in International Law? Israel and Area C: a case study Author: Eugenia de Lacalle Supervisor: François Dubuisson ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, our warmest thanks go to our thesis supervisor, François Dubuisson. A big part of this piece of work is the fruit of his advice and vast knowledge on both the conflict and International Law, and we certainly would not have been able to carry it out without his help. It has been an amazing experience to work with him, and we have learned more through having conversations with him than by spending hours doing research. We would like to deeply thank as well all those experts and professors that received an e-mail from a stranger and accepted to share their time, knowledge and opinions on such a controversial topic. They have provided a big part of the foundation of this research, all the while contributing to shape our perspectives and deepen our insight of the conflict. A list of these outstanding professionals can be found in Annex 1. Finally, we would also like to thank the Spanish NGO “Youth, Wake-Up!” for opening our eyes to the Israeli-Palestinian reality and sparkling our passion on the subject. At a more technical level, the necessary field research for this dissertation would have not been possible without its provision of accommodation during the whole month of June 2019. 1 ABSTRACT Since the occupation of the Arab territories in 1967, Israel has been carrying out policies of de facto annexation, notably through the establishment of settlements and the construction of the Separation Wall.
  • O Occupied East Jerusalem

    O Occupied East Jerusalem

    Occupied East Jerusalem “De-Palestinization” and Forcible Transfer of Palestinians A situation of systematic breaches of State obligations under the ICCPR JOINT NGO REPORT to the UN Human Rights Committee For the Committee’s Review of the Fourth Periodic Report of ISRAEL Submitted by: The Civic Coalition for Palestinian Rights in Jerusalem (CCPRJ) Contact: Zakaria Odeh, executive director Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 2343929 www.civiccoalition-jerusalem.org The Coalition for Jerusalem (CFJ) Contact: Aminah Abdelhaq, coordinator Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 6562272 url: www.coalitionforjerusalem.org The Society of St. Yves, Catholic Center for Human Rights (St. Yves) Contact: Dalia Qumsieh, head of advocacy Email: [email protected] Tel: +972 2 6264662 url: www.saintyves.org 1 Content Introduction Paragraph RECOMMENDATIONS A. Constitutional and legal framework within which the Covenant is implemented by Israel in occupied East Jerusalem (Art. 1, 2) Question 4: Application of the Covenant in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT) 4 – 11 Question 5: Equality and non-discrimination in Israeli law, courts; other measures 12 – 22 Recommended Questions to the State party (Art. 1 and 2) B. State of Emergency (Art. 4); derogations from international standards Questions 12, 19: Progress in review of Israel’s state of emergency; derogations 23 – 25 from international standards (complementary issues) Recommended Questions to State party (Article 4) C. Freedom of movement and residence (Art. 12, 2; also 14, 17, 23, 24, 26) Questions 20, 21: Complementary information on Palestinians in East Jerusalem 26 – 34 D. Protection of the Family, Protection of the Child (Art.23, 24, 2; 12, 14, 17, 24, 26) Question 25: Measures taken by the State party to revoke the Citizenship and 35 – 45 Entry Into Israel Law; right to marriage E.
  • Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism

    Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism

    Claremont Colleges Scholarship @ Claremont CMC Senior Theses CMC Student Scholarship 2018 Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism Mohamad Batal Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, and the Law and Politics Commons Recommended Citation Batal, Mohamad, "Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism" (2018). CMC Senior Theses. 1826. https://scholarship.claremont.edu/cmc_theses/1826 This Open Access Senior Thesis is brought to you by Scholarship@Claremont. It has been accepted for inclusion in this collection by an authorized administrator. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Claremont McKenna College Shifting Priorities? Civic Identity in the Jewish State and the Changing Landscape of Israeli Constitutionalism Submitted To Professor George Thomas by Mohamad Batal for Senior Thesis Spring 2018 April 23, 2018 ii iii iv Abstract: This thesis begins with an explanation of Israel’s foundational constitutional tension—namely, that its identity as a Jewish State often conflicts with liberal- democratic principles to which it is also committed. From here, I attempt to sketch the evolution of the state’s constitutional principles, pointing to Chief Justice Barak’s “constitutional revolution” as a critical juncture where the aforementioned theoretical tension manifested in practice, resulting in what I call illiberal or undemocratic “moments.” More profoundly, by introducing Israel’s constitutional tension into the public sphere, the Barak Court’s jurisprudence forced all of the Israeli polity to confront it. My next chapter utilizes the framework of a bill currently making its way through the Knesset—Basic Law: Israel as the Nation-State of the Jewish People—in order to draw out the past and future of Israeli civic identity.
  • O Pioneers! Have Israeli Jews Really Lost Their Self- Confident, Forward-Looking Spirit?

    O Pioneers! Have Israeli Jews Really Lost Their Self- Confident, Forward-Looking Spirit?

    March 2014 http://mosaicmagazine.com/supplemental/2014/03/o-pioneers/ O Pioneers! Have Israeli Jews really lost their self- confident, forward-looking spirit? By Haviv Rettig Gur A member of Kibbutz Ein Gev carrying a basket with gravel. Photo by Zoltan Kluger. Courtesy Goverment Press Office. Yoav Sorek’s essay, “Israel’s Big Mistake,” is many things at once: a paean to a once- vigorous and self-confident Israel; a lament over the failures and shattered dreams of Arab- Israeli rapprochement; a mash-up of history, ideology, and political analysis in a heartfelt—but, I fear, ultimately misguided—plea for a regenerated Zionist spirit. There is much to commend here, especially in the way Sorek frames Israelis’ perceptions of the Israeli-Arab relationship over the past seven decades. He ably puts his finger on a key feature of Zionism: the yearning for acceptance. This same impulse characterized nearly all the diverse Jewish responses to the attractions and the dangers of modernity. For Jewish nationalists of the 19th and early 20th centuries, it prescribed the assimilation by Jews of the increasingly universal categories of political identity underlying the new international state system. The impulse for recognition, reciprocity, and normalcy did not die with the birth of the Jewish state in 1948. As Sorek rightly notes, it was an integral part of Israel’s sense of self from its earliest days onward. His essay examines the history of this need as expressed particularly in Israeli-Palestinian peacemaking—a need that in his view turned into a self-incriminating and self-defeating ideology.