DOCSLIB.ORG

Taiya Inlet Railroad Dock Project and NMFS’S IHA Issuance, 2018 AKR-2018-9831

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Taiya Inlet Railroad Dock Project and NMFS’S IHA Issuance, 2018 AKR-2018-9831 Endangered Species Act Section 7(a)(2) Biological Opinion Taiya Inlet Railroad Dock Dolphin Project, Skagway, Alaska NMFS Consultation Number: AKR-2018-9831 Action Agency: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), and Permits and Conservation Division, Office of Protected Resources (PR1), National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA Affected Species and Determinations: Is the Is Action Is Action Action Is Action Likely To Likely to Likely to Likely To Destroy or ESA-Listed Status Adversely Adversely Jeopardize Adversely Species Affect Affect the Modify Species? Critical Species? Critical Habitat? Habitat? Humpback Whale, Mexico DPS Threatened Yes N/A No N/A (Megaptera novaeangliae) Sperm whale (Physeter Endangered No N/A No N/A macrocephalus) Steller Sea Lion, Western DPS Endangered Yes No No No (Eumatopias jubatus) Consultation Conducted By: National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Region Issued By: ____________________ James W. Balsiger, Ph.D. Regional Administrator Date: February 11, 2019 Taiya Inlet Railroad Dock Project and NMFS’s IHA issuance, 2018 AKR-2018-9831 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................................................. 2 LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ 4 LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... 4 TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .............................................................................................. 5 1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................. 6 1.1 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................. 6 1.2 CONSULTATION HISTORY ................................................................................................ 8 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION AND ACTION AREA ...................... 8 2.1 PROPOSED ACTION........................................................................................................... 8 2.1.1 Construction of Dock Dolphin .................................................................................. 10 2.1.2 Transport of Material and Equipment ....................................................................... 11 2.1.3 Dates and Duration of Activities............................................................................... 11 2.1.4 Acoustic Sources ....................................................................................................... 12 Impact Hammer ....................................................................................................................... 12 Vibratory Hammer .................................................................................................................... 13 DTH Hydro-Hammering ............................................................................................................. 13 2.1.5 Mitigation Measures ................................................................................................. 13 WP&YR Proposed Mitigation Measures .......................................................................................... 13 NMFS PR1 Proposed Mitigation ................................................................................................... 14 2.2 ACTION AREA ................................................................................................................ 23 3 APPROACH TO THE ASSESSMENT ............................................................................ 25 4 RANGEWIDE STATUS OF THE SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITAT ................. 27 4.1 SPECIES AND CRITICAL HABITATS NOT CONSIDERED FURTHER IN THIS OPINION .......... 27 4.1.1 Sperm Whales ........................................................................................................... 27 4.1.2 Steller Sea Lion Critical Habitat ............................................................................... 28 4.2 CLIMATE CHANGE ......................................................................................................... 29 4.3 STATUS OF LISTED SPECIES ........................................................................................... 32 4.3.1 Mexico DPS Humpback Whale ................................................................................ 32 4.3.2 Western DPS Steller Sea Lion .................................................................................. 36 5 ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE ..................................................................................... 40 5.1 FACTORS AFFECTING SPECIES WITHIN THE ACTION AREA ............................................. 40 5.1.1 Climate Change ......................................................................................................... 40 5.1.2 Fisheries .................................................................................................................... 41 5.1.3 Fishing Gear and Marine Debris Entanglement........................................................ 42 5.1.4 Harvest ...................................................................................................................... 43 5.1.5 Natural and Anthropogenic Noise ............................................................................ 43 5.1.6 Pollutants and Discharges ......................................................................................... 44 2 Taiya Inlet Railroad Dock Project and NMFS’s IHA issuance, 2018 AKR-2018-9831 5.1.7 Scientific Research.................................................................................................... 45 5.1.8 Vessel Interactions .................................................................................................... 46 5.1.9 Environmental Baseline Summary ........................................................................... 48 6 EFFECTS OF THE ACTION ........................................................................................... 48 6.1 STRESSORS ..................................................................................................................... 49 6.1.1 Stressors Not Likely to Adversely Affect ESA-listed Species ................................. 49 6.1.2 Stressors Likely to Adversely Affect ESA-listed Species ........................................ 51 6.2 EXPOSURE ...................................................................................................................... 53 6.2.1 Exposure to Major Noise Sources............................................................................. 54 6.2.2 Exposure to Vessel Interactions ................................................................................ 61 6.3 RESPONSE ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................... 61 6.3.1 Responses to Major Noise Sources (Pile Driving/Removal and DTH Hammering) 62 6.3.2 Responses to Vessel Noise........................................................................................ 73 6.3.3 Response Summary ................................................................................................... 74 7 CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ................................................................................................ 76 8 INTEGRATION AND SYNTHESIS OF EFFECTS ....................................................... 77 9 CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................... 78 10 INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT............................................................................... 78 10.1 AMOUNT OR EXTENT OF TAKE ....................................................................................... 79 10.2 EFFECT OF THE TAKE ..................................................................................................... 80 10.3 REASONABLE AND PRUDENT MEASURES ....................................................................... 80 10.4 TERMS AND CONDITIONS ............................................................................................... 81 11 CONSERVATION RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................................. 84 12 REINITIATION NOTICE ................................................................................................. 84 13 DATA QUALITY ACT DOCUMENTATION AND PRE-DISSEMINATION REVIEW ...................................................................................................................................... 85 13.1 UTILITY ......................................................................................................................... 85 13.2 INTEGRITY ..................................................................................................................... 85 13.3 OBJECTIVITY .................................................................................................................. 85 14 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 86 3 Taiya Inlet Railroad Dock Project and NMFS’s IHA issuance, 2018 AKR-2018-9831 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Temporary Template and Permanent Pile Details for New Construction (PND Engineers 2018). ................................... 10 Table 2. Pile Driving and Removal Modeling Scenarios for the WP&YR Dolphin Project
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skagway 2030 Comprehensive Plan Consulting Team
    Comprehensive Plan January 17, 2019 Public Hearing Draft Beautiful, diverse Skagway, place for everyone Bliss and Gunalchéesh Cynthia Tronrud We create Skagway Oddballs and adventurers Living out our dreams Wendy Anderson Forever small town Skies shushing on snow through birch Howling his love for all Robbie Graham Acknowledgements PLANNING COMMISSION ASSEMBLY Matt Deach, Chair Mayor Andrew Cremata Philip Clark Steve Burnham Jr., Vice Mayor Gary Hisman David Brena Richard Outcalt Jay Burnham Joseph Rau Orion Hanson Assembly Liaison, Orion Hanson Dan Henry Dustin Stone Tim Cochran (former) Project Manager Shane Rupprecht, Skagway Permitting Official Special Thanks to the Following Individuals who Graciously Provided Information and Answered Countless Questions during Plan Development Emily Deach, Borough Clerk Heather Rodig, Borough Treasurer Leola Mauldin, Tax Clerk Kaitlyn Jared, Skagway Development Corporation, Executive Director Sara Kinjo-Hischer, Skagway Traditional Council, Tribal Administrator This Plan Could Not Have Been Written Without The Assistance of Municipal Staff, Including: Alanna Lawson, Accounts Payable/Receivable Katherine Nelson, Recreation Center Director Clerk Lea Mauldin, Tax Clerk Brad Ryan, Borough Manager Matt Deach, Water / Wastewater Superintendent Cody Jennings, Tourism Director, Convention Matt O'Boyle, Harbormaster & Visitors Bureau Michelle Gihl, Assistant to the Manager/ Emily Deach, Borough Clerk Deputy Clerk Emily Rauscher, Emergency Services Administrator Ray Leggett, Police Chief Gregg Kollasch, Lead
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter-Supported Commercial Recreation Activities in Alaska
    HELICOPTER-SUPPORTED COMMERCIAL RECREATION ACTIVITIES IN ALASKA Prepared for Alaska Quiet Rights Coalition Prepared by Nancy Welch Rodman, Welch & Associates and Robert Loeffler, Opus Consulting Funded by a grant from Alaska Conservation Foundation October 2006 Helicopter-Supported Commercial Recreation Activities in Alaska Helicopter-Supported Commercial Recreation Activities in Alaska TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary.................................................................................................................. ES-1 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................1-1 1.1. Purpose of this report...............................................................................................1-1 1.2. What is not covered by this report ...........................................................................1-1 2. Laws, Regulations and Policies..........................................................................................2-1 2.1. Legal Authority to Regulate.....................................................................................2-1 2.2. Strategies to Regulate Impacts.................................................................................2-5 2.3. Limitations on Authorities, Permit Terms, and Strategies.......................................2-7 2.4. Summary..................................................................................................................2-8 3. Types and Consumers of Helicopter-Supported
    [Show full text]
  • Dyea Flats Management Plan) Skagway Municipal Code 16.10.010 – 16.10.040 (Dyea Management Plan)
    2010 REVISED DYEA FLATS LAND MANAGEMENT PLAN Municipality of Skagway Dyea Community Advisory Board National Park Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program Taiya Inlet Watershed Council United States Fish and Wildlife Service Coastal Conservation Program June 17, 2010 Final June 17, 2010 Final TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Title Table of Contents I. Introduction II. Existing Conditions Natural Resources Cultural/Historic Resources Current Recreational and Other Uses of Dyea Flats III. Existing Code Skagway Municipal Code 16.08.010-16.08.040 (Dyea Flats Management Plan) Skagway Municipal Code 16.10.010 – 16.10.040 (Dyea Management Plan) IV. Chronology of Dyea Flats Planning Past Planning and Public Involvement Other Plans Governing Management of Dyea Flats V. Revised Dyea Flats Land Management Plan Vision (Statement of Intent) Goals and Objectives Dyea Flats 5-Year Action Plan VI. Plan Administration APPENDICES Table 1: Exotic Invasive Plants in the Dyea Area Table 2: Waterbird And Raptor Species Recorded In Dyea Flats o Note: tables are representative of species known to be in the Dyea area Municipal Entitlement Final Findings and Decision Bibliography of Studies Related to Dyea Flats 1996 Dyea Flats Management Plan Vendor Agreements • Chilkoot Horseback Adventures • Sockeye Cycle Photos by Andrew Cremata, used by permission. June 17, 2010 Final I. INTRODUCTION Dyea Flats represents a special place in the hearts of those who live and recreate in the Municipality of Skagway. The 202 acre tidal flats offer multiple opportunities for outdoor activities and for learning about nationally significant cultural and historic events. The flats also provide important habitat for fish and wildlife ranging from the anadromous salmon to the western toad to the Alaskan coastal brown bear.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Park Science 19(1): Arctic Alaska Are Living at the Species’ Northern-Most to Identify Habitats Most Frequented by Bears and 4-9
    National Park Service US Department of the Interior Alaska Park Science Region 11, Alaska Below the Surface Fish and Our Changing Underwater World Volume 19, Issue 1 Noatak National Preserve Cape Krusenstern Gates of the Arctic Alaska Park Science National Monument National Park and Preserve Kobuk Valley Volume 19, Issue 1 National Park June 2020 Bering Land Bridge Yukon-Charley Rivers National Preserve National Preserve Denali National Wrangell-St Elias National Editorial Board: Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Leigh Welling Debora Cooper Grant Hilderbrand Klondike Gold Rush Jim Lawler Lake Clark National National Historical Park Jennifer Pederson Weinberger Park and Preserve Guest Editor: Carol Ann Woody Kenai Fjords Managing Editor: Nina Chambers Katmai National Glacier Bay National National Park Design: Nina Chambers Park and Preserve Park and Preserve Sitka National A special thanks to Sarah Apsens for her diligent Historical Park efforts in assembling articles for this issue. Her Aniakchak National efforts helped make this issue possible. Monument and Preserve Alaska Park Science is the semi-annual science journal of the National Park Service Alaska Region. Each issue highlights research and scholarship important to the stewardship of Alaska’s parks. Publication in Alaska Park Science does not signify that the contents reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, nor does mention of trade names or commercial products constitute National Park Service endorsement or recommendation. Alaska Park Science is found online at https://www.nps.gov/subjects/alaskaparkscience/index.htm Table of Contents Below the Surface: Fish and Our Changing Environmental DNA: An Emerging Tool for Permafrost Carbon in Stream Food Webs of Underwater World Understanding Aquatic Biodiversity Arctic Alaska C.
    [Show full text]
  • Routes to Riches 2015 1 Danielhenryalaska.Com
    Routes to Riches 2015 1 danielhenryalaska.com Routes to Riches Daniel Lee Henry [email protected] A ground squirrel robe nearly smothered northern Tlingits’ nascent trust in their newly-landed missionaries. Long-time trading ties with Southern Tutchone and Interior Tlingit funneled wealth to Native residents of the upper Lynn Canal. Luxurious furs from the frigid north brought prices many times that of local pelts. For example, while the coastal red fox fur was worth $1.75 in “San Francisco dollars” in 1883, a Yukon silver fox brought up to $50 (about $1200 in 2015). Several times a year, Tlingit expeditions traversed routes considered secret until local leaders revealed their existence to Russians and Americans in the mid-nineteenth century. A day’s paddle to the upper Chilkat River brought travelers to a trail leading over through barrier coastal mountains into the vast, rolling subarctic Interior. On the eastern route, packers left Dyea at the terminus of Taiya Inlet and slogged a twenty-mile trail to a keyhole pass into lake country that drains into the Yukon River headwaters. The image of prospectors struggling up the “Golden Staircase” to Chilkoot Pass engraved the Klondike gold rush of ‘98 onto the license plates of cultural memory. For centuries, Chilkats and Chilkoots sustained a trading cartel connected by their respective routes. From tide’s edge to the banks of the Yukon River four hundred miles north, Tlingits insisted on customer allegiance. They discouraged Interior trading partners from commerce with anyone but themselves and expressly prohibited economic activity without invitation. The 1852 siege of Fort Selkirk and subsequent expulsion of Hudson’s Bay Company demonstrated the market realities of the Chilkat/Chilkoot cartel.
    [Show full text]
  • Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park Natural Resource Condition Assessment
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Natural Resource Program Center Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2011/288 ON THE COVER. Taiya River Valley Photograph by: Barry Drazkowski, August 2009 Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park Natural Resource Condition Assessment Natural Resource Report NPS/NRPC/WRD/NRR—2011/288 Barry Drazkowski Andrew Robertson Greta Bernatz GeoSpatial Services Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota 700 Terrace Heights, Box #7 Winona, Minnesota 55987 This report was prepared under Task Agreement J8W07080025 between the National Park Service and Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota, through the Pacific Northwest Cooperative Ecosystem Studies Unit. January 2011 U.S. Department of the Interior National Park Service Natural Resource Program Center Fort Collins, Colorado i The National Park Service, Natural Resource Program Center publishes a range of reports that address natural resource topics of interest and applicability to a broad audience in the National Park Service and others in natural resource management, including scientists, conservation and environmental constituencies, and the public. The Natural Resource Report Series is used to disseminate high-priority, current natural resource management information with managerial application. The series targets a general, diverse audience, and may contain NPS policy considerations or address sensitive issues of management applicability. All manuscripts in the series receive the appropriate level of peer review to ensure that the information is scientifically credible, technically accurate, appropriately written for the intended audience, and designed and published in a professional manner. Views, statements, findings, conclusions, recommendations, and data in this report do not necessarily reflect views and policies of the National Park Service, U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Dyea Walking Tour Brochure.Indd
    Kl Hidden reminders of Gold Rush Dyea Getting to the Dyea Townsite Klondike Gold Rush Dyea was a small trading post and native village before Take the Klondike Highway out of town until you see the National Historical Park the gold rush began in July of 1897, but, in just a few sign for Dyea. Take a left onto the Dyea road and travel months, its population shot up to an estimated 8,000 9 miles to the Dyea area. Drive over the bridge and take when it became a principal port city for the Klondike your fi rst left, following signs to Dyea Historic Site. Take stampeders. Its prosperity proved to be short-lived. The two left turns to arrive in the parking area. Dyea Townsite town’s poor harbor, the disastrous snow slide of April 3, 1898, and the construction of the White Pass and Yukon Self-Guided Route Railroad out of Skagway all contributed to the demise of the town. By 1903, the population had fallen to Chilkoot Trailhead Walking Tour only 3. Since the rush, nature has reclaimed Dyea, pro- Slide Cemetery viding an excellent example of forest succession at work. The National Park Service purchased this portion of Taiya River Dyea in 1978. The park protects the natural and cultural Dyea Campground & resources here to ensure that this area is preserved for Ranger station future generations. Stampeders with their provisions on the Dyea fl ats during the gold rush (1898) Townsite Parking Area Dyea Flats To Skagway 10 miles National Park Service Photo courtesy of University of Washington Visitor Center All remains are protected under Since 1978 the Chilkoot Trail and Dyea Townsite federal and state laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Haines Comprehensive Plan 2025 Downloadable
    HAINES BOROUGH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN SEPTEMBER 2012 HAINES BOROUGH 2025 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN September 2012 Acknowledgements Planning and Zoning Commission Assembly Rob Goldberg, Chair Stephanie Scott, Mayor Andy Hedden Daymond Hoffman Don Turner III Debra Schnabel Roger Maynard Jerry Lapp Lee Heinmiller Joanne Waterman Robert Venables Norm Smith Danny Gonce Steve Vick Joanne Waterman, Assembly liaison Jan Hill (former mayor) Pete Lapham (former) Scott Rossman (former) Borough staff significantly contributed to this plan, they are: Project Manager: Mark Earnest, Borough Manager Al Badgley, Fireman Meredith Pochardt, Youth Development Coordinator Connie Staska, Admin Asst/Sales Tax Clerk Patricia Peters, Pool Manager Darsie Culbeck, Special Projects Patty Brown, Director, Public Library Dean Olsen, Assistant Assessor Phil Benner, Harbormaster Brian Lemcke, Director of Public Facilities Scott Bradford, Water/Sewer Plt Operator, Fire Chief Gary Lowe, Police Chief Steve Ritzinger, Planning Technician Jamie Heinz, Assistant Borough Clerk Tanya Carlson, Tourism Director Jerrie Clarke, Sheldon Museum Director Tina Olsen, Accounting Clerk Jila Stuart, Finance Director Former staff: Brad Maynard, Public Works Director; Julie Cozzi, Borough Clerk Ed Barrett, Harbormaster Parks and Recreation Advisory Committee members provided significant input and ran a public review of the draft maps, they are: Marnie Hartman, Chair Melany Zimmerman Daymond Hoffman, Assembly liaison Jennifer Talley Darsie Culbeck Logan Simpson Jessica Kayser Ron Jackson Others who provided information and assistance Over 100 residents attended one or more Community Meetings or work sessions or sent in comments. About 120 joined the project mailing list to track the process. This plan could not have been prepared without the information you provided. The 208 Haines households polled in the Community Opinion Survey also provided valuable information that supported this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 Ii Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 Iii Acknowledgements
    Haines Coastal Management Program Final Plan Amendment With Assistance from Sheinberg Associates Juneau, Alaska Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 ii Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 iii Acknowledgements This plan revision and update would not have been possible without the help of many people who gave their time and expertise. Most important were the Haines Coastal District Coordinator Scott Hansen, who produced maps and provided support for meetings and guidance, Borough Manager Robert Venables, and the Haines Borough Planning Commission: Jim Stanford, Chair Harriet Brouillette Bob Cameron Rob Goldberg Lee Heinmiller Bill Stacy Lynda Walker The Haines Borough Mayor and Assembly also contributed to the development of this Plan. They were: Mike Case, Mayor Jerry Lapp, Deputy Mayor Scott Rossman Stephanie Scott Debra Schnabel Norman Smith Herb VanCleve Others who assisted in the development of this plan by providing information or by following its development include local groups such as the Takshanuk Watershed Council and Chilkat Indian Association. State and Federal staff were helpful in their review and comments on resource inventory and analysis and policy development. Gina Shirey-Potts, OPMP was especially attentive and helpful as were Patty Craw, DGGS-ADNR; Joan Dale, SHPO-ADNR; Mike Turek, ADFG; Roy Josephson, Forestry and Roselynn Smith, ADNR. My apologies to anyone inadvertently left off the acknowledgements. Frankie Pillifant, Sheinberg Associates. Haines Coastal Management Plan - 2007 iv Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Plan December 2019 Public Hearing Draft
    Technical Plan December 2019 Public Hearing Draft Beautiful, diverse Skagway, place for everyone Bliss and Gunalchéesh Cynthia Tronrud We create Skagway Oddballs and adventurers Living out our dreams Wendy Anderson Forever small town Skies shushing on snow through birch Howling his love for all Robbie Graham Acknowledgements PLANNING COMMISSION ASSEMBLY Matt Deach, Chair Mayor Andrew Cremata Philip Clark Steve Burnham Jr., Vice Mayor Gary Hisman David Brena Richard Outcalt Jay Burnham Joseph Rau Orion Hanson Assembly Liaison, Orion Hanson Dan Henry Dustin Stone Tim Cochran (former) Project Manager Shane Rupprecht, Skagway Permitting Official Special Thanks to the Following Individuals who Graciously Provided Information and Answered Countless Questions during Plan Development Emily Deach, Borough Clerk Heather Rodig, Borough Treasurer Leola Mauldin, Tax Clerk Kaitlyn Jared, Skagway Development Corporation, Executive Director Sara Kinjo-Hischer, Skagway Traditional Council, Tribal Administrator This Plan Could Not Have Been Written Without The Assistance of Municipal Staff, Including: Alanna Lawson, Accounts Payable/Receivable Katherine Nelson, Recreation Center Director Clerk Lea Mauldin, Tax Clerk Brad Ryan, Borough Manager Matt Deach, Water / Wastewater Superintendent Cody Jennings, Tourism Director, Convention Matt O'Boyle, Harbormaster & Visitors Bureau Michelle Gihl, Assistant to the Manager/ Emily Deach, Borough Clerk Deputy Clerk Emily Rauscher, Emergency Services Administrator Ray Leggett, Police Chief Gregg Kollasch, Lead Groundskeeper
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage 707 a Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501
    KLONDIKE GOLD RUSH NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY KLONDIKE GOLD RUSH NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT Matthew L. Carlson, Michelle Sturdy, Rob Lipkin, & Julie A. Michaelson Alaska Natural Heritage Program Environment and Natural Resources Institute University of Alaska Anchorage 707 A Street Anchorage, Alaska 99501 National Park Service Alaska Region Inventory & Monitoring Program NPS Report : 2nd Edition, December 2004 Cooperative Agreement No. 1443CA991000013 Funding Source: National Park Service, Inventory & Monitoring Program KLONDIKE GOLD RUSH NATIONAL HISTORICAL PARK VASCULAR PLANT INVENTORY ABSTRACT In 2002 and 2003 the University of Alaska Anchorage, Alaska Natural Heritage Program (AKNHP), conducted vascular plant field inventories in Klondike Gold Rush National Historical Park as part of the Inventory and Monitoring Program of the National Park Service. The primary goal was to document greater than 90% of the vascular plant species expected to occur within the park and significantly improve our understanding of current vascular plant species distributions. The inventory targeted diverse habitat types and poorly sampled areas. The AKNHP visited ten diverse eco-geographic regions and sampled intensively within these regions from mid-June to mid-August, 2002 and early July in 2003. A total of 283 specimens were collected, recorded, pressed, and curated. One hundred seventy four individual taxa are represented, 55 are new records for the park, and an additional ten represent verifications of previously unvouchered reports. The percentage of documented taxa increased from 78% to 86% after the 2002 and 2003 field seasons. A number of finds were range extensions or taxa of conservation concern. Collections were made of the state and globally restricted species: Phyllodoce empetriformis (G4- S1S2 rank) and Eleocharis kamtschatica (G4-S2).
    [Show full text]
  • SIR 2020–5059: Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Taiya River
    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Taiya River Near the West Creek Tributary, Southeast Alaska 1,000 100 10 1 Discharge, in cubic meters per second 0.1 Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov. Dec. Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5059 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover: Background image: Midriver view of the Taiya River downstream from the Dyea Road bridge and upstream from the historical Dyea downtown area, looking downstream, Alaska (photograph by Janet Curran, U.S. Geological Survey, August 30, 2017). Inset images, left to right: Hydrograph showing maximum, mean, and minimum daily discharge and peak discharge for period of record for U.S. Geological Survey streamgage on Taiya River, Alaska; relative elevation model of Taiya River main stem valley bottom for 2003 conditions, Alaska. Hydrology and Geomorphology of the Taiya River Near the West Creek Tributary, Southeast Alaska By Janet H. Curran Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Scientific Investigations Report 2020–5059 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey James F. Reilly II, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2020 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov.
    [Show full text]