DOCSLIB.ORG

Remediation of Slope Failure by Compacted Soil-Cement Fill

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Remediation of Slope Failure by Compacted Soil-Cement Fill Remediation of Slope Failure by Compacted Soil-Cement Fill Jason Y. Wu, P.E., M.ASCE1; Kaiming Huang2; and Munira Sungkar3 Abstract: Remediation of a complete destroyed slope is often difficult because of various geotechnical challenges and different constraints at the site. Many solutions have been developed; however, not all stabilization methods are appropriate for every type of slope failure. In addition to the technical considerations, aesthetic concerns and sustainability have also become significant issues during the past decades because of global environmental concerns. The principle of multiple-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) will be helpful in the consideration of these alternatives when all criteria are considered simultaneously. In this study, it was concluded that compacted soil-cement would be the best solution for the site after MCDA procedures. This paper presents a detailed report to demonstrate the benefits of utilizing compacted soil- cement for the restoration of slope failure. Traditionally, compacted soil-cement stabilization has been used worldwide for embankment constructions to mitigate the constraints of problematic sites. When it is applied in a slope remediation, the stability of the reconstructed slope can be improved with the increased strength of the cemented material. The experience described herein indicates that slopes treated with compacted soil-cement not only successfully meet all the site criteria, they also display sustainable performance. Compared to slopes con- structed with traditional stabilization methods, the slope in this case demonstrates superior performance. Based on field monitoring to date, the slope in the described case continues to maintain its structural stability and safety. The utilization of compacted soil-cement fill is a valuable and sustainable solution, particularly for those sites that have concerns with the disposal of impracticable silty debris waste. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000998. © 2017 American Society of Civil Engineers. Author keywords: Slope failure; Remediation; Compacted soil-cement; Sustainability. Introduction environmental protection and sustainable development also have become significant issues because of concerns about extreme Landslides of unsaturated slopes, triggered by rainfall infiltration and climate and global warming. Ways of reducing negative human im- reduction of matric suction, have become a major worldwide concern pact or using eco-friendly solutions are often mandatory for many over the past few decades (Rahardjo et al. 2001; Wu and Wang environment-sensitive sites (Jefferis 2008; Keaton 2014; Kil et al. 2011). The increase in unit weight and loss in strength due to severe 2016). At times, because of other nontechnical influences, the final rainfall have caused many slopes to disintegrate, leading to piles of decision may not even be made by the design engineer. Therefore, debris and rubble at the site. The rehabilitation of such failures is the determination of treatment for a landslide appears to have no difficult, especially for slopes that consist of silty or clayey soils with definitive rule to follow. Experts recommend that the factors to be high water content. Reconstruction of these materials for the repair of considered for the selection of correct remediation include safety, slopes is also difficult because of fines. The removal and disposal of construction scheduling, availability of materials, site accessibility, the collapsed debris can be particularly troublesome because of envi- equipment availability, aesthetics, environmental impact, political ronmental restrictions in the metropolitan areas. issues, and labor considerations (Abramson et al. 2002; Corkum There are many solutions for landslide rehabilitation. Common and Martin 2004; Brencich 2010; Costa and Sagaseta 2010). A principles used are unloading, drainage, reinforcement, retaining multitude of variables are required to develop the best or the most structures, and surface vegetation (Cornforth 2005). However, appropriate solution, but integrating all variables together generally Abramson et al. (2002) and Brencich (2010) indicate that not all results in an ambiguous or controversial solution. One of the more stabilization methods are appropriate for every type of slope failure; effective methods is using the principle of multicriteria decision the most expensive treatment may not always be the most effective, analysis (MCDA), a valuable method in making important deci- and vice versa. Recently, in addition to technical considerations, sions that cannot be easily decided (Sánchez 2005; Sabzi and King 2015; Kil et al. 2016). Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 02/21/17. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. Compacted soil-cement fill is a highly compacted mixture of 1Professor, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chung Hua Univ., Hsinchu, Taiwan 30012, Republic of China (corresponding author). E-mail: soil, cement, and water that has been used for decades to meet en- [email protected] gineering purposes for a variety of infrastructures to improve 2Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chung Hua Univ., unsuitable subgrade or to modify soft soil properties (Bergado et al. Hsinchu, Taiwan 30012, Republic of China. E-mail: mkm_huang@rrb. 1996; PCA 2016). By compacting a mixture of cement and soil to a gov.tw designated density, both shear strength and durability of the 3 Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Chung Hua Univ., Hsinchu, material increase substantially. Cement stabilization improves soil Taiwan 30012, Republic of China. E-mail: [email protected] structure by increasing intercluster cementation bonding and reduc- Note. This manuscript was submitted on May 8, 2016; approved on October 17, 2016; published online on February 15, 2017. Discussion ing the pore space (Horpibulsuka et al. 2010). Therefore, it can be period open until July 15, 2017; separate discussions must be submitted used to construct embankments or rebuild failed slopes (Gill and for individual papers. This paper is part of the Journal of Performance Bushell 1992; Abramson et al. 2002). In comparison with other of Constructed Facilities, © ASCE, ISSN 0887-3828. remedial solutions, compacted soil-cement fill presents many © ASCE 04017022-1 J. Perform. Constr. Facil. J. Perform. Constr. Facil., -1--1 Fig. 1. Plan view of the sliding area (adapted from Wu et al. 2016, © ASCE) advantages. It can use on-site materials and therefore reduces the Site Description need for debris disposal. It does not need a retaining wall and thus provides more space and a more attractive appearance. It eliminates As shown in Fig. 1, the site is located in the eastern vicinity of Hsinchu City near Baoshan Reservoir in Taiwan. The hill slope excess moisture problems and promotes easier workability for silty is located at the northwest wing of a residential community. A soils. Its cost and construction time are also competitive compared 4-m-wide access road alongside a curved side hill alignment to other solutions. and a 6-m-high concrete retaining wall along the road were at This study aims to present a solution by using compacted soil- the toe of the slope. A landslide occurred during a strong typhoon cement to successfully rehabilitate a landslide in a congested res- when torrential rainfall hit Taiwan. The slope failure was approx- idential area. Associated with the major study objectives are the 2 imately 2,750 m in plan dimensions, with a height of approxi- remedial measures undertaken for the treatment, such as construc- mately 27 m from the toe to the top of the head scarp. The tion procedures and environmental concerns. The experiences pre- landslide resulted in three to four slumped terraces that caused a sented herein can be beneficial and valuable for cases with similar complete collapse of the upper and lower retaining walls (Figs. 2 conditions. and 3). The slide debris also buried the access road, rendering it completely inaccessible to local traffic. The lower margin of the displaced material just barely stopped in front of several residential Downloaded from ascelibrary.org by Iowa State University on 02/21/17. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. Fig. 2. Collapsed lower slope and retaining wall (reprinted from Wu et al. 2016, © ASCE) Fig. 3. Collapsed upper slope and retaining wall (image by Jason Y.Wu) © ASCE 04017022-2 J. Perform. Constr. Facil. J. Perform. Constr. Facil., -1--1 houses. Residents were evacuated to prevent any further life- Laboratory Testing threatening conditions. Laboratory test results indicated that the silty sand contained plastic As an immediate short-term response, the area around the head fines varying from 36 to 43%. Material based on the Unified Soil scarp was covered with a plastic vinyl sheet to minimize ingress of Classification System (ASTM D2487), the sand can therefore be surface water into cracks in the slide area. Several emergency classified as SC-SM (silty clayey sand) material (ASTM 2011a). ditches were installed to divert the surface water from the slide Field water contents ranged from a low of 15.3% to a high of location. 32.6% at the surface. Moisture unit weight varied from 19.6 to 20.5 kN=m3. The quick direct shear strength parameters for sam- ples obtained at depths of 5–9 m ranged from 13 to 39 kPa for Geotechnical Evaluations cohesion and 17–19° for angle of shearing resistance. Site Investigation Slide Assessment The site is composed of interbedded sandstone,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management
    October 2010 Agdex 510-1 Agricultural Soil Compaction: Causes and Management oil compaction can be a serious and unnecessary soil aggregates, which has a negative affect on soil S form of soil degradation that can result in increased aggregate structure. soil erosion and decreased crop production. Soil compaction can have a number of negative effects on Compaction of soil is the compression of soil particles into soil quality and crop production including the following: a smaller volume, which reduces the size of pore space available for air and water. Most soils are composed of • causes soil pore spaces to become smaller about 50 per cent solids (sand, silt, clay and organic • reduces water infiltration rate into soil matter) and about 50 per cent pore spaces. • decreases the rate that water will penetrate into the soil root zone and subsoil • increases the potential for surface Compaction concerns water ponding, water runoff, surface soil waterlogging and soil erosion Soil compaction can impair water Soil compaction infiltration into soil, crop emergence, • reduces the ability of a soil to hold root penetration and crop nutrient and can be a serious water and air, which are necessary for water uptake, all of which result in form of soil plant root growth and function depressed crop yield. • reduces crop emergence as a result of soil crusting Human-induced compaction of degradation. • impedes root growth and limits the agricultural soil can be the result of using volume of soil explored by roots tillage equipment during soil cultivation or result from the heavy weight of field equipment. • limits soil exploration by roots and Compacted soils can also be the result of natural soil- decreases the ability of crops to take up nutrients and forming processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study on Slope Stability Changes Caused by Earthquakes—Focusing on Gyeongju 5.8 ML EQ
    sustainability Article Case Study on Slope Stability Changes Caused by Earthquakes—Focusing on Gyeongju 5.8 ML EQ Sangki Park , Wooseok Kim *, Jonghyun Lee and Yong Baek Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology, 283, Goyang-daero, Ilsanseo-gu, Goyang-si 10223, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (J.L.); [email protected] (Y.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-31-910-0519 Received: 16 July 2018; Accepted: 16 September 2018; Published: 27 September 2018 Abstract: Slope failure is a natural hazard occurring around the world and can lead to severe damage of properties and loss of lives. Even in stabilized slopes, changes in external loads, such as those from earthquakes, may cause slope failure and collapse, generating social impacts and, eventually causing loss of lives. In this research, the slope stability changes caused by the Gyeongju earthquake, which occurred on 12 September 2016, are numerically analyzed in a slope located in the Gyeongju area, South Korea. Slope property data, collected through an on-site survey, was used in the analysis. Additionally, slope stability changes with and without the earthquake were analyzed and compared. The analysis was performed within a peak ground acceleration (PGA) range of 0.0 (g)–2.0 (g) to identify the correlation between the slope safety factor and peak ground acceleration. The correlation between the slope safety factor and peak ground acceleration could be used as a reference for performing on-site slope stability evaluations. It also provides a reference for design and earthquake stability improvements in the slopes of road and tunnel construction projects, thus supporting the attainment of slope stability in South Korea.
    [Show full text]
  • Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government Engineers
    Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government Engineers David Saftner, Principal Investigator Department of Civil Engineering University of Minnesota Duluth June 2017 Research Project Final Report 2017-17 • mndot.gov/research To request this document in an alternative format, such as braille or large print, call 651-366-4718 or 1- 800-657-3774 (Greater Minnesota) or email your request to [email protected]. Please request at least one week in advance. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. 3. Recipients Accession No. MN/RC 2017-17 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Slope Stabilization and Repair Solutions for Local Government June 2017 Engineers 6. 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. David Saftner, Carlos Carranza-Torres, and Mitchell Nelson 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Project/Task/Work Unit No. Department of Civil Engineering CTS #2016011 University of Minnesota Duluth 11. Contract (C) or Grant (G) No. 1405 University Dr. (c) 99008 (wo) 190 Duluth, MN 55812 12. Sponsoring Organization Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period Covered Minnesota Local Road Research Board Final Report Minnesota Department of Transportation Research Services & Library 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 395 John Ireland Boulevard, MS 330 St. Paul, Minnesota 55155-1899 15. Supplementary Notes http:// mndot.gov/research/reports/2017/201717.pdf 16. Abstract (Limit: 250 words) The purpose of this project is to create a user-friendly guide focusing on locally maintained slopes requiring reoccurring maintenance in Minnesota. This study addresses the need to provide a consistent, logical approach to slope stabilization that is founded in geotechnical research and experience and applies to common slope failures.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Geosynthetics to Improve Road Performance
    2011-20TS Published December 2011 Using Geosynthetics to Improve Road Performance What Was the Need? To increase performance, roads are sometimes reinforced The use of geogrids in road with geosynthetic polymer materials, including geogrids foundations clearly benefits and geotextiles. Geogrids consist of polymers formed into TECHNICAL relatively rigid, gridlike configurations. They are com- pavement performance, monly placed between the subgrade and base or base potentially leading to longer SUMMARY and subbase layers of roads to add strength and stiffness and to slow deterioration. Geotextiles are polymer fabrics service lives for roads and Technical Liaison: that may also provide some reinforcement, but are used Lou Tasa, MnDOT reduced maintenance costs. primarily to: [email protected] • Facilitate filtration and water drainage through road foundation soils without the loss Administrative Liaison: of soil particles. Dan Warzala, MnDOT [email protected] • Provide separation between dissimilar base materials, improving their integrity and functioning. Principal Investigator: • Provide a stable construction platform over soft or wet soils, facilitating the movement Tim Clyne, MnDOT of equipment and the process of soil compaction. [email protected] Of several kinds of geotextiles, Type V is the most commonly used in Minnesota, primarily as a separator. Despite the relatively widespread use of geosynthetics in LRRB PROJECT COST: reconstructing paved county roads and state trunk highways as well as in constructing $30,000 new roads, their performance has not been well documented in Minnesota. Research was needed to obtain field data that would indicate whether geosynthetics extend the service lives of roads and reduce the need for maintenance.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Compaction / Pore Space
    Soil Compaction / Pore Space Bulk density is defined as the ratio of oven dried soil to its bulk volume, which indicates the volume of particles and the pore space between particles. By Clarence Chavez Aggregate Stability and Infiltration Demonstration Poor GdGood Water Quality Soil Soil Health Health Poor Good Nutritional Soil Soil Value Health Health CO2 Poor Good Crop Yields SilSoil Soil and Quality Health Animal Health Health and production Non-compacted VS Compacted Soil Types Water Mineral Mineral Air OM Note: IWM 3 soil data interpretation table for IWM planning can be used also. Bulk Density Field Testing Bulk Density Ideal Bulk Bulk Densities that (Soil Type Densities restrict Table 4. pg. 57) (g/cm3) root growth sands, < 1.6 > 1.80 loamy sands sandy loams, < 1.4 > 1.80 loams S. C. loams, loams, clay loams < 1.4 > 1.75 silts, < 1.3 > 1.75 silt loams silt loams, silty clay loams < 1.4 > 1.65 S. clays, silty clays, some clay loams < 1.10 > 1.58 (35-45% clay) clays (> 45% clay) < 1.10 > 1.47 Soil Penetrometer: Use and Cost The ideal resistance of your top soil should be less than 200 psi. I f you take a reading of more than 200 psi in the field at Field Capacity then you may start to have the making of a hardpan or compacted soil. Cornell Soil Health Assessment Training Manual 2nd Edition (2009) $150 to $300 ea. Soil Penetrometer: PSI Table 10 to 300 PSI 300 to 400 PSI > 400 PSI Moisture Content shldhould be at fifildeld capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE)
    INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR SOIL MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING This paper was downloaded from the Online Library of the International Society for Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering (ISSMGE). The library is available here: https://www.issmge.org/publications/online-library This is an open-access database that archives thousands of papers published under the Auspices of the ISSMGE and maintained by the Innovation and Development Committee of ISSMGE. Session 3/9 The Compaction of Soil for Earthworks and the Performance of Plant Le compactage des sols pour les travaux de terrassement, le comportement et l’efficacité du matériel by W. A. Lewis, B.Sc., A.M.I.C.E., Road Research Laboratory, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England Summary Sommaire This paper discusses the results of recent research work on soil Cet exposé passe en revue les résultats des recherches sur le com­ compaction carried out at the Road Research Laboratory. The pactage des sols effectuées récemment au Laboratoire de Recherches work has comprised broadly:— Routières en Angleterre (Road Research Laboratory). L’étude a compris en général: (1) Consideration of the factors affecting the selection of the mois­ ture content at which to compact soil in earthworks. 1° Le choix de la teneur en eau à laquelle le sol doit être com­ (2) Investigation of the state of compaction required in road pacté lors de l’exécution de terrassements. embankments. (3) Study of the performance of plant used for compacting soils. 2° Le contrôle du compactage dans l’exécution de remblais. An account is given of investigations of the performance of the 3° L’observation et la critique des résultats obtenus avec le ma­ types of compaction plant usually employed in the British Isles, and tériel utilisé dans le compactage des sols.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio State Soil Balancing Project Summary
    OHIO AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Ohio State Soil Balancing Project Summary Caroline Brock, Cassandra Brown, Steve Culman, Doug Doohan, Cathy Herms, Doug Jackson-Smith, Matt Kleinhenz, Subbu Kumarappan, The Ohio State University Soil Balancing Team What is Soil Balancing? Soil balancing is a soil management strategy founded on base cation saturation ratio (BCSR) theory. BCSR theory prescribes the use of soil amendments, commonly gypsum and high-calcium lime, to achieve an ideal ratio of the base 55% cations calcium, magnesium, and potassium (Ca, Mg, K). The Practiced soil commonly preferred ratio is 65% Ca, 10% Mg, and 5% K. balancing 45% Why the Interest? more likely to... Did not * use gypsum or The sparse academic research on soil balancing has been practice soil unable to support its effectiveness. Despite this fact, our hi-cal lime * rate maintaining conversations with farmers in recent years suggested that balancing BCSR ratios as soil balancing was being widely used. In our 2018 survey important or very of organic corn farmers in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana, and important to farm Michigan, we found that about half of the 859 respondents management. reported using soil balancing on their farms. (See Figure 1). Survey respondents who used soil balancing reported many improvements which they attributed to soil balancing. More than 70% reported improvements in soil quality, nutrient Figure 1. Percent of Organic Corn Grower Survey availability, crop quality and yield, soil biological activity, and Respondents Who Reported Using Soil Balancing. A little over half of our survey respondents reported using infiltration/drainage. A smaller number (40-50%) reported less soil balancing on their farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Study of Soil Compaction DELON HAMPTON, Senior Research Engineer, and E
    Field Study of Soil Compaction DELON HAMPTON, Senior Research Engineer, and E. T. SELIG, Manager, Soil Mechanics, IIT Research Institute, Chicago Full-scale field tests dealing with soil compaction for highway construction were undertaken to determine the following: (a) the desired characteristics of compacted soil, (b) how best to measure and specify the proper compaction, and (c) the effectiveness of various methods of achieving compaction. The test variables included were type of soil or base course material, moisture con­ tent, lift thickness, type of compactor, compactive effort, and number of roller coverages. Measurements of the soil properties were made using a cone penetrometer, 6- in. bearing plate, CBR apparatus, seismograph, portable nuclear moisture/ density instrument, nuclear Road Log­ ger and sand cone, together with conventional moisture content procedures. The experiments were divided into 6 sets, 3 for subgradc s oils and 3 for base cour s e ma­ terials, each incorporating some of the independent var­ iables for different purposes. Statistical techniques were used for planning the experiments and analyzing the data. This paper describes the scope of the field tests, the plans and procedures and the type of information being obtained. •IN 1964, the U. S. Bureau of Public Roads in conjunction with 14 states and Puerto Rico undertook sponsorship of a comprehensive study of soil compaction. The re­ search comprised three parts. North Carolina State of the University of North Carolina at Raleigh was to evaluate the state of the art of compaction of s oil and r ock materials for highway purposes. The Ohio State University was to study fundamental properties of soils in the labor ator y, on a r heological basis, to deter mine whal lhe basic pr op­ erties of soils in relation to soil compaction are.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Soil Drainage and Compaction
    East Balhagardy Soil Nutrient Network Meeting 02-11-17 Soil Compaction Managing Soil Drainage and Compaction Key factors for movement of water in the soil • Soil Texture • Soil Structure • Soil Compaction Soil Texture What is Soil? Soil Texture • It describes the physical composition of the soil – % of sand, silt and clay • Refers to the mineral fragments of the soil only – water and organic material are not considered – only considers particles <2mm • Texture is a stable soil property - does not change measurably over a long period of years 7 Soil texture classes 0 100 10 90 20 80 30 70 Clay 40 <0.002 mm 60 0.06-0.002 mm Clay Silt 50 50 60 40 Silty clay Sandy clay 70 30 Silty clay Clay loam loam 80 20 Sandy clay loam 90 10 Sandy loam Sandy silt loam Silt loam Loamy Sand 100 0 sand 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Sand 2-0.06 mm 8 Soil texture & water • The sizes of pores in a soil are related to its texture – Sands have large pores – Clays have small pores • Large pores allow free drainage – Sandy soils drain more easily than clays • Small pores store water – Clay soils have a bigger water holding capacity than sandy soils 9 Water in soil • Gravitational water – drains freely from large pores – only available to plants for a short time • Capillary water – held in small pores – available for plants • Hygroscopic water – held tightly around small particles – not available to plants 10 Soil Structure Soil structure: the importance of macropores • Macropores and cracks : allow water infiltration and drainage, keep the soil aerated reducing nitrous loss and increase water uptake and crop yield.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Geotextiles on the Compaction Properties of Soils
    d 2n International Conference on New Developments in Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, 28-30 May 2009, Near East University, Nicosia, North Cyprus Effect of geotextiles on the compaction properties of soils S. Nilay Keskin P rof. PhD., Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Engineering-Architecture, Department of Civil E ngineering, Isparta, 32260, Turkey. Ömür Çimen T.Selçuk Göksan Soner Uzundurukan A ssist. Prof. PhD., Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Engineering-Architecture, Department of Civil Engineering, Isparta, 32260, Turkey. Mehmet Karpuzcu M s. Of Science, Civil Engineer, Isparta, 32260, Turkey KEYWORDS: Geotextile, Compaction, Clay, Sand, Pumice. ABSTRACT: In order to improve the engineering characteristic of the soil, several methods have been applied such as compressing the soil, using supplementary materials, carrying out thermo operations and using geotextile. Nowadays, usage of geotextiles in stabilization of the soil is increasing gradually. The geotextile products used for different purposes in soil and foundation engineering are produced in a great variety. In this study, the effects of woven and non-woven geotextiles on the compaction parameters of sand, clay and pumice were investigated. For this aim, compaction tests were conducted on sand, clay and pumice specimens. Compaction tests were also conducted on the specimens that were reinforced with one layer of geotextile and reinforced with two layers of geotextiles respectively. And results obtained from these tests were compared. No significantly effect was observed of geotextile reinforcement of pumice on the quality of compaction. Maximum dry density and optimum water content values of clayey soil were obtained on the experiments that were conducted on the clayey soil reinforced with one layer of propex 6062 (woven).
    [Show full text]
  • GEOTECHNICAL NOTES November 2016
    GEOTECHNICAL NOTES November 2016 1. The Applicant shall be responsible for all subgrade inspection and soil compaction testing associated with any work within a City right-of-way, private property subject to a public access easement, or private property subject to City easement for public utilities or public improvements; and/or any work associated with a sediment control facility, or stormwater management practice. This work shall be completed by or under the supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Maryland. For the purposes of these notes and associated approved plans, this Engineer shall be referred to as the Geotechnical Engineer and shall be an independent firm from the Applicant. 2. Any plans subject to NRCS-MD Pond Code 378 Standards/Specifications, as shown on the plans, shall supersede these notes when these notes are less stringent or in case of conflict. Any reference to the Engineer in the 378 Standard/Specifications shall be the Professional Engineer who stamped and sealed the design plans. Any reference to the Geotechnical Engineer shall be the Geotechnical Engineer as defined above or the Geotechnical Engineer who completed certain aspects of the pond design. 3. All inspections, tests, supporting data, reports, and certifications shall be provided to the City of Rockville Department of Public Works (DPW) and shall be sealed by the Geotechnical Engineer. Daily inspection reports, if requested by the City, can be provided without being immediately sealed by the Geotechnical Engineer. These reports shall be compiled, reviewed, sealed and then submitted to DPW at a later date as agreed upon by the City.
    [Show full text]
  • SOIL COMPACTION and STABILITY By: Charles S
    SOIL COMPACTION AND STABILITY By: Charles S. Gresser, P.E., Construction Materials Testing Division Manager It’s difficult to stick with the basics if you can’t remember them. Here’s a brief review of the fundamentals of soil compaction and stability, along with advice about dealing with unstable subgrades. Geotechnical engineers have to answer questions about soil compaction and stability on a regular basis. The questions often asked by architects, developers, contractors and civil engineers are “How can compaction results be obtained that are greater than 100 percent?” and “How can soil that meets compaction requirements be unstable?” SOIL COMPACTION To review some basics of soil mechanics, compaction is the process by which a mass of soil consisting of solid soil particles, air, and water is reduced in volume by the momentary application of loads, such as rolling, tamping, or vibration. Compaction involves an expulsion of air without a significant change in the amount of water in the soil mass. Thus, the moisture content of the soil, which is defined as the ratio of the weight of water to the weight of dry soil particles, is normally the same for loose, uncompacted soil as for the same soil after compaction. Since the amount of air is reduced without change in the amount of water in the soil mass, the degree of saturation (the ratio of the volume of water to the combined volume of air and water) increases. When used as a construction material, the significant engineering properties of soil are its shear strength, its compressibility, and its permeability.
    [Show full text]