humanities Article Walking off the Edge of the World: Sacrifice, Chance, and Dazzling Dissolution in the Book of Job and Ursula K. Le Guin’s “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” Alexander Keller Hirsch Department of Political Science, University of Alaska, Fairbanks, AK 99774, USA;
[email protected] Academic Editor: Albrecht Classen Received: 15 June 2016; Accepted: 29 July 2016; Published: 9 August 2016 Abstract: This article compares Ursula K. Le Guin’s short story, “The Ones Who Walk Away from Omelas” (1974) to the book of Job. Both stories feature characters who can be read as innocent victims, but whereas the suffering in Le Guin’s tale benefits many, Job is the victim of useless suffering. Exploring this difference, I draw on George Bataille’s theory of sacrifice as useless expenditure, and developed his concept of the “will to chance” in my reading of how each set of characters responds to the complex moral impasses faced. In the end, I read both stories as being about the struggle to create a viable, meaningful life in a world that is unpredictable and structurally unjust. Keywords: Ursula K. Le Guin; Job; sacrifice; guilt; chance; complicity; redemption “Suppose the truth were awful, suppose it was just a black pit, or like birds huddled in the dust in a dark cupboard? Who could face this? All philosophy has taught a facile optimism, even Plato did so. Any interpretation of the world is childish. The author of the Book of Job understood it. Job asks for sense and justice. Jehovah replies that there is none.