DOCSLIB.ORG

DARIUS' FAMILY Darius' Extended Family Is Known Only from Herodotus. Several Mem- Bers Figure in Book 6 Or the Background To

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX 5 DARIUS’ FAMILY Darius’ extended family is known only from Herodotus. Several mem- bers figure in book 6 or the background to it. Persian kings married within the family, and also took steps to give their relations impor- tant positions of command.1 There is a complete stemma in RE 1 sv Achaimenidae 196 and a useful one in Stein on 7.11, reproduced Abbott 131. I here detail only Darius’ generation and the next. Those who appear in book 6 or the background to it are italicised. For ease of reference, note the following abbreviations: B = brother; BL = brother-in-law; W = wife; D = daughter; Cdr 480 = commander in 480. For some collateral Achaemenids, their precise blood rela- tionship to either the Cyrus-Cambyses or Hystaspes-Darius side of the family is unknown. I give only the principal references. Darius had three known brothers: B1: Artabanos had 4 or 5 sons, all Cdr 480 (7.66, 67, 75, 82, and perhaps 7.62 with 8.26) B2: Artanes had a daughter Phratagune married to Darius, W6, (7.224) B3: Artaphrenes the satrap (5.25–35 passim, 5.100, 123; 6 passim) had a son Artaphrenes, general with Datis (§§94, 119) Darius had three known brothers-in-law: BL1: Gobryas the conspirator (his marriage: 7.5) had a son Mardonius, who married a daughter of Darius, D1 (§§43, 45, 94) and a daughter married to Darius, W5 BL2: Otanes, noted §43, as to whom see Note 1 (his marriage: 7.82) BL3: Theaspes, an Achaemenid (his marriage: 4.43) had two sons, one executed (4.43) and one Cdr 480 (7.79) 1 See Briant (1996) 105, 144–5, 606–7 for the importance of royal marriages in helping to ensure that royal power remained within the Achaemenid family; 365 for a resumé of the positions and offices of male Achaemenids, and 148, 320–1 for his sons-in-law. 492 appendix 5 Darius had six known wives, W1 to W4: 3.88; W5: 7.2; W6: 7.224, by whom he had 13 known sons: W1: Atossa daughter of Cyrus (previously married to Cambyses); 4 sons, Xerxes and 3 others Cdr 480 (7.64, 82, 97) W2: Artystone daughter of Cyrus; 2 sons Cdr 480 (7.69, 72) W3: Parmys daughter of Smerdis; 1 son Cdr 480 (7.78) W4: Phaidyme daughter of Otanes the conspirator (note 1), previ- ously married to Cambyses and the Magus; possibly Arsamenes Cdr 480 (7.68) was her son W5: his niece, daughter of Gobryas, BL1; 3 sons, two Cdr 480 (7.2, 68, 97) W6: his niece Phratagune daughter of Artanes, B2; 2 sons killed at Thermopylae (7.224) Darius had at least one other son, Achaemenes (3.12, 7.7, etc) Darius had at least 6 daughters (mothers unknown): D1, Artozostra married to his nephew Mardonius, son of Gobryas, BL1 (§43); D2 to D4 (names unknown) married to Daurises Hymaees and Otanes (Note 1), the generals who started to suppress the Ionian revolt (p. 54); D5 (name unknown) married to Artochmes Cdr 480 (7.73); and D6, Sandoce, mentioned in Plut Them 13.2 and Arist 9.2, married to Artayktes, possibly the governor of Sestos (Hdt 9.116–122). Note 1, Otanes: it is not possible to be certain about how many Otanes there were. (a) BL2, Otanes the conspirator (§43) son of Pharnaspes, was an Achaemenid (2.1, 3.2, 68). In 522 he was old enough for his daugh- ter Phaidyme, W4, to have been married to Cambyses and then the Magus. He can thus have been born no later than c555 (e.g. daugh- ter born 535, first married 523). He was involved in restoring Syloson to Samos (3.141). (b) Otanes was one of three sons-in-law of Darius who were generals in Ionia in 498–7 (p. 54), married to one of D2–D4. (c) One or more Otanes appear in book 7 as (1) BL2, father of Smerdomenes, Cdr 480 by Darius’ sister (7.82); (2) Cdr 480, and father of Amestris, Xerxes’ wife (7.61); (3) father of Anaphes, Cdr 480 (7.62); and (4) father of Xerxes’ charioteer, the latter perhaps too young to be a general (7.40). These could all be the same man, BL2, the conspirator, rewarded with a niece as well as a sister as a wife; though by 480 he would.
Recommended publications
  • Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    Marathon 2,500 Years Edited by Christopher Carey & Michael Edwards

    MARATHON 2,500 YEARS EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS BULLETIN OF THE INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SUPPLEMENT 124 DIRECTOR & GENERAL EDITOR: JOHN NORTH DIRECTOR OF PUBLICATIONS: RICHARD SIMPSON MARATHON – 2,500 YEARS PROCEEDINGS OF THE MARATHON CONFERENCE 2010 EDITED BY CHRISTOPHER CAREY & MICHAEL EDWARDS INSTITUTE OF CLASSICAL STUDIES SCHOOL OF ADVANCED STUDY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON 2013 The cover image shows Persian warriors at Ishtar Gate, from before the fourth century BC. Pergamon Museum/Vorderasiatisches Museum, Berlin. Photo Mohammed Shamma (2003). Used under CC‐BY terms. All rights reserved. This PDF edition published in 2019 First published in print in 2013 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- NoDerivatives (CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0) license. More information regarding CC licenses is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Available to download free at http://www.humanities-digital-library.org ISBN: 978-1-905670-81-9 (2019 PDF edition) DOI: 10.14296/1019.9781905670819 ISBN: 978-1-905670-52-9 (2013 paperback edition) ©2013 Institute of Classical Studies, University of London The right of contributors to be identified as the authors of the work published here has been asserted by them in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Designed and typeset at the Institute of Classical Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Introductory note 1 P. J. Rhodes The battle of Marathon and modern scholarship 3 Christopher Pelling Herodotus’ Marathon 23 Peter Krentz Marathon and the development of the exclusive hoplite phalanx 35 Andrej Petrovic The battle of Marathon in pre-Herodotean sources: on Marathon verse-inscriptions (IG I3 503/504; Seg Lvi 430) 45 V.
  • Ionian Revolt to Marathon

    Ionian Revolt to Marathon

    2/26/2012 Lecture 11: Ionian Revolt to Marathon HIST 332 Spring 2012 Life for Greek poleis under Cyrus • Cyrus sent messages to the Ionians asking them to revolt against Lydian rule – Ionians refused After conquest: • Ionian cities offered to be Persian subjects under the same terms – Cyrus refused, citing the Ionians’ unwillingness to help – Median general Harpagus sent to conquer Ionia – Installed tyrants to rule for Persia Ionian Revolt (499-494 BCE) 499 Aristagoras, tyrant of Miletos wants to attack Naxos • He can’t pay for it – so persuades satrap to invade – The invasion fails • Aristogoras needs to repay Persians • leads rebellion against Persian tyrants • He goes to Greece to ask for help – Sparta refuses – Athens sends a fleet 1 2/26/2012 Cleomenes’ reply to Aristagoras • Aristagoras goes to Sparta to solicit help – tells King Cleomenes that the “Great King” lived three months from the sea (i.e. easy task) “Get out of Sparta before sundown, Milesian stranger, for you have no speech eloquent enough to induce the Lacedemonians to march for three months inland from the sea.” -Herodotus, Histories 5.50 Ionian Rebellion Against Persia Ionian cities rebel 498 Greeks from Ionia attempt to take Satrap capital of Sardis – fire breaks out • Temple of Ahura-Mazda is burned • Battle of Ephesus – Greeks routed 497-5 Persian Counter-Attack – Cyprus taken – Hellespont pacified 494 Sack of Miletus Satrap installs democracies in place of tyrannies Darius not pleased with the Greeks • Motives obscure – punishment of Athenian aid to Ionians – was
  • The Relationship Between the Western Satraps and the Greeks

    The Relationship Between the Western Satraps and the Greeks

    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository Graduate Studies The Vault: Electronic Theses and Dissertations 2018-11-08 East Looking West: the Relationship between the Western Satraps and the Greeks Ward, Megan Leigh Falconer Ward, M. L. F. (2018). East Looking West: the Relationship between the Western Satraps and the Greeks (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Calgary, Calgary, AB. doi:10.11575/PRISM/33255 http://hdl.handle.net/1880/109170 doctoral thesis University of Calgary graduate students retain copyright ownership and moral rights for their thesis. You may use this material in any way that is permitted by the Copyright Act or through licensing that has been assigned to the document. For uses that are not allowable under copyright legislation or licensing, you are required to seek permission. Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY “East Looking West: the Relationship between the Western Satraps and the Greeks.” by Megan Leigh Falconer Ward A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY GRADUATE PROGRAM IN GREEK AND ROMAN STUDIES CALGARY, ALBERTA NOVEMBER, 2018 © Megan Leigh Falconer Ward 2018 Abstract The satraps of Persia played a significant role in many affairs of the European Greek poleis. This dissertation contains a discussion of the ways in which the Persians treated the Hellenic states like subjects of the Persian empire, particularly following the expulsion of the Persian Invasion in 479 BCE. Chapter One looks at Persian authority both within the empire and among the Greeks.
  • Assyria & Babylonia

    Assyria & Babylonia

    1 Will be published in: Melammu Symposia V. Commerce and Monetary Systems in the Ancient World: Means of Transmission and Cultural Interaction, R. Rollinger/Ch. Ulf (Hg.), Stuttgart 2004 Some Observations on the Image of the Assyrian and Babylonian Kingdoms within the Greek Tradition, by Reinhold Bichler ([email protected]) Preface: Berossus and the former Greek tradition1 Within the field of extant Greek historical writing on the subject of the Assyrian and Babylonian kingdoms the fragments of Berossus’ History of Babylonia, written by a so-called “Chaldean” priest2, but addressed to a Greek-speaking audience, deserve our special attention. How could Berossus’ account correspond to the legendary and speculative tradition presented by the former Greek historians? Since Berossus probably had access to some cuneiform sources and was more familiar with the cultural tradition of his country than any other author of our sources written in Greek, he should be able to give us a more solid information than his famous predecessors, in particular Herodotus and Ctesias. And this is certainly true, as far as only names and dates are concerned and – to a certain extent – also some concrete deeds of the rulers of Babylon in the first millennium BC, mainly during the time of the Neo- Babylonian Empire. But there are a lot of major problems to consider, if we look at the information given in the fragments of his work as far as the history of the Neo-Assyrian Empire and his relationship to the contemporary Babylonian kingdom are concerned. Yet even the fragments relating directly to the Neo-Babylonian kings are in some way dubious since they seem to be written under the influence of former Greek traditions.
  • Herodotus and the Beginning of the Ionian Revolt (5.28–38.1) Rosaria Vignolo Munson1

    Herodotus and the Beginning of the Ionian Revolt (5.28–38.1) Rosaria Vignolo Munson1

    chapter 5 The trouble with the Ionians: Herodotus and the beginning of the Ionian Revolt (5.28–38.1) Rosaria Vignolo Munson1 the larger context Placed at the very centre of Herodotus’ work (5.28–6.42), the Ionian Revolt of 499–494 bc plays a pivotal role, both chronologically and causally, link- ing the Persians’ Eastern campaigns to their invasions of Greece.2 It also represents a crucial moment in Herodotus’ history of the Ionians, which spans the whole work from beginning to end. The Ionians jump-start the Histories, one might say, and they do so because they find themselves at the receiving end of the first known Eastern aggressions against Greeks (1.5.3, 6.2–3). Croesus of Lydia completes ‘the first subjection of Ionia’, as the narrator summarizes at the end of the Croesus logos.3 The second is called ‘enslavement’, when Cyrus defeats Croesus and conquers his possessions.4 And so is the third, which occurs after the failure of the revolt we are examining: oÌtw d t¼ tr©ton ïIwnev katedoulÛqhsan, präton mn Ëp¼ Ludän, dªv d pex¦v t»te Ëp¼ Perswn In this way the Ionians were enslaved for the third time, [having been conquered] first by the Lydians and twice in a row by the Persians. (6.32) The Ionians become free from Persian domination after the Greek victory at the time of Xerxes’ invasion. But the 1-2-3 count in the statement above proleptically alludes to a fourth subjection, beyond the chronological range 1 I thank Carolyn Dewald and Donald Lateiner for reading earlier drafts of this paper and offering suggestions.
  • The Battle of Marathon: the Stunning Victory and Its Contribution to the Rise of Athens

    The Battle of Marathon: the Stunning Victory and Its Contribution to the Rise of Athens

    Studia Antiqua Volume 5 Number 2 Article 5 December 2007 The Battle of Marathon: The Stunning Victory and Its Contribution to the Rise of Athens Doug Marsh Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua Part of the History Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Marsh, Doug. "The Battle of Marathon: The Stunning Victory and Its Contribution to the Rise of Athens." Studia Antiqua 5, no. 2 (2007). https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/studiaantiqua/vol5/iss2/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Studia Antiqua by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. The Battle of Marathon: The Stunning Victory and Its Contribution to the Rise of Athens Doug Marsh THENS had never before been faced with so great a threat as the approach APersian forces to the Greek mainland in 490 b.c.e. Angered by the insolence of Athens and Eretria, which had recently supplied aid to rebelling Ionian cities, the Persian king Darius dispatched his generals Datis and Ataphernes “with the charge to reduce Athens and Eretria to slavery and to bring the slaves back into his presence.” Both Herodotus and Plato saw this dispatch as a mere pretext to accomplish his true aim: to enslave all of Greece and Europe.1 He moved first against the Eretrians, “reputed to be amongst the noblest and most warlike of the Hellenes of that day (and they were numer- ous); but he conquered them all in three days.”2 Having accomplished his objective against Eretria, Darius next turned his gaze to Athens, leaving it and its citizens to decide whether they ought to attempt to resist their seemingly inevitable defeat.3 Faced with almost certain ruin, many Athenian generals did not wish to fight, “seeing that they were too few to fight with the army of the Medes.” With the voting generals evenly split between those for and against fighting, the deciding vote was to be cast by Callimachos, the polemarch.
  • Week 7: the Persians Wars

    Week 7: the Persians Wars

    Week 7: The Persians Wars Lecture 12, Marathon, Key Words Aryans Media Babylonia Lydia Persia Cyrus Achaemenid Armenia Syria Cappadocia Croesus Cambyses Egypt India Sudan Persian Gulf Darius Samos Polycrates Scythia Macedon Miltiades Danube Earth and Water Boeotia Chalcis Corinth Demaratus Cleruchs Aegina Ionian Rebellion Aristagoras Miletus Naxos Sardis Eretria Lade Hipparchus archon 496/5 Phrynichus Chersonnesus Piraeus Themistocles 1 Mardonias Thrace Mt. Athos Rapprochement Datis Artaphernes Delos Carystus Pheidippides Pan Carneia Arête Beach head Cavalry Archers Plataeans Herakleion Marshes Charadra Soros Cynosura Phaleron Dromoi Grundy Stoa Poikile Aeschylus Hastings Spanish Armada Neville Chamberlain Bertrand Russell Churchill Marlborough Holocaust Sophocles Euripides Aristophanes Socrates Plato Aristotle Phidias Parthenon Pericles Scientific Revolution Western Civilization Marathonomachoi 2 Chronological Table for Persian History and the Persian Wars 2000-1000 Indo-Iranians migrate from the Eurasian plains of south Russia, across the Caucasus Mountains and into upper-Mesopotamia; others move east of the Caspian Sea and into the Indus river valley (founders of the Aryan Sanskrit civilization). 1150-1000 Phrygians migrate from the Balkans into central Anatolia; spread of iron technology: early Iron Age (1150-550). 950 Phrygian kings establish capital at Gordium and unite Anatolian plateau. 900-612 Assyria dominates the Near East. 844 Assyrian records refer to the Iranian tribes, the Persians. 836 Assyrian records mention the Medes. 705-690 Phrygian power shattered by Cimmerians (Iranian or Thracian nomads, who swept over Asia Minor and Syria at the end of the 8th /early 7th century); Lydia becomes independent of Phrygia. 700-675 Medes coalesce into a united kingdom under the initiative of the Mede Deioces (Hdt.
  • Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott 1

    Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott 1

    Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott 1 Chapter Page CHAPTER I. CHAPTER II. CHAPTER III. CHAPTER IV. CHAPTER V. CHAPTER VI. CHAPTER VII. CHAPTER VIII. CHAPTER IX. CHAPTER X. CHAPTER XI. CHAPTER XII. Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott 2 The Project Gutenberg EBook of Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net Title: Darius the Great Makers of History Author: Jacob Abbott Release Date: January 13, 2009 [EBook #27802] Language: English Character set encoding: ISO-8859-1 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK DARIUS THE GREAT *** Produced by D Alexander and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive) Makers of History Darius the Great BY JACOB ABBOTT WITH ENGRAVINGS NEW YORK AND LONDON HARPER & BROTHERS PUBLISHERS Darius the Great, by Jacob Abbott 3 1904 Entered, according to Act of Congress, in the year one thousand eight hundred and fifty, by HARPER & BROTHERS, in the Clerk's Office of the District Court of the Southern District of New York. Copyright, 1878, by JACOB ABBOTT. [Illustration: DARIUS CROSSING THE BOSPORUS.] PREFACE. In describing the character and the action of the personages whose histories form the subjects of this series, the writer makes no attempt to darken the colors in which he depicts their deeds of violence and wrong, or to increase, by indignant denunciations, the obloquy which heroes and conquerors have so often brought upon themselves, in the estimation of mankind, by their ambition, their tyranny, or their desperate and reckless crimes.
  • Ionian Revolt (499-494 BCE)

    Ionian Revolt (499-494 BCE)

    4/12/2012 Lecture 24: Greeks Tame the Hydra HIST 213 Spring 2012 Chronology of Persian-Greek Interaction 550 Ionian Greeks under Persian rule 499-4 Ionian Rebellion 490 Darius invades Greece – Battle of Marathon 480 Xerxes Invades Greece – Battles of Salamis and Plataea 448 Peace Treaty between Persia and Greece 407 Persians fund Spartan fleet 401 Anabasis of Xenophon 396-5 Invasion of Asia Minor by Agesilaos 395 Persians fund Social War in Greece 350 Philip II of Macedonia calls for “crusade” against Persia Ionian Revolt (499-494 BCE) 499 Aristagoras, tyrant of Miletos wants to attack Naxos • He can’t pay for it – so persuades satrap to invade – The invasion fails • Aristogoras needs to repay Persians • leads rebellion against Persian tyrants • He goes to Greece to ask for help – Sparta refuses – Athens sends a fleet 1 4/12/2012 Ionian Rebellion Against Persia Ionian cities rebel 498 Greeks from Ionia attempt to take Satrap capital of Sardis – fire breaks out • Temple of Ahura-Mazda is burned • Battle of Ephesus – Greeks routed 497-5 Persian Counter-Attack – Cyprus taken – Hellespont pacified 494 Sack of Miletus Satrap installs democracies in place of tyrannies Darius not pleased with the Greeks • Motives obscure – punishment of Athenian aid to Ionians – was going to conquer it anyway • fleet and army prepared to sail to Attica and Eretria • Approaches former Athenian tyrant Hippias 2 4/12/2012 Persian Wars Three Phases: Phase I: 490s 492 Persian fleet destroyed at Athos 490 Battle of Marathon Phase II 480 BCE August Battle of Thermopylae/Artemisium Sept Persians occupy Athens – Athens burned Battle of Salamis (naval) – Greeks Win Phase III 479 BCE 479 Battle of Plataea First Persian Invasion (492) Mardonios led the Persian Army across the Hellespont into Thrace and Macedonia Athens and Eretria are assumed to have been targets Persian fleet is destroyed off the Chalcidice near Mt.
  • Herodotus and Marathon

    Herodotus and Marathon

    HERODOTUS AND MARATHON J.A.S. Evans Herodotus had has own priorities when he wrote his account of Marathon. "Everyone knows that Herodotus' narrative of Marathon will not do," began A.W. Gomme, in an essay published more than thirty years ago, from which I have shamelessly borrowed my title.''' But it is our earliest and best account, and its point of view is more remarkable than most moderns have noticed. By the time Herodotus published his Histories 2 in the early years of the Archidamian War, Marathon had become the touch• stone of Athenian patriotism, and the fundament (or at least a good part of it) of her claim to be the saviour of Greece, as Herodotus himself acknowledged in the speech that he gave the Athenians at Plataea, where they claimed the honour of the left wing.^ There, at Marathon, they had stood alone against Persia and defeated forty-six nations! Yet, in Herodotus' account, what seems to have been most significant — signifi• cant enough, at least, to deserve remark — was that at Marathon, for the first, Greeks charged on the double and first dared to look without fear upon men in Persian dress (Hdt. 6.112.3). At Marathon, Persian expansionism reached its tide-mark. In fact, if we look at the structure of the Histories, it appears that Marathon, which for us is the opening battle of the Persian Wars, was, for Herodotus, simply the concluding act of the Ionian Revolt. From the start of the Histories up to the Scythian Expedition of Darius, he 1 2 dealt with Asiatic imperialism, with many geographical and ethnological excursuses.
  • Character List for Herodotus 7

    Character List for Herodotus 7

    Herodotus Histories Character List for Herodotus 7 The characters are mentioned in order of appearance in the text. Darius Darius I, also known as Darius the Great. 3rd king of the Achaemenid dynasty of Persia. Born 550 BC, died 486 BC. Ruled 522-486. Father of Xerxes I. Attained the throne by overthrowing the usurper Gaumata. Secured lands in Egypt conquered by the previous king, Cambyses II. Sent expedition to punish Athens and Eretria for their support of the Ionian revolt, which ended in defeat at the Battle of Marathon in 490. Was planning second expedition at time of death. Xerxes Xerxes I, also known as Xerxes the Great. 4th king of the Achaemenid dynasty of Persia. Born 518BC, died 465BC. Gained throne by claiming porphyrogeniture against his brother Artobazanes. Crushed revolts in Egypt and Babylon. Launched second Persian invasion of Greece in 480BC. Defeated the Spartans at Thermopylae. Sacked and burned Athens. Defeated at Battle of Salamis and retreated to Asia. Contingent under Mardonius finally defeated by combined Greek forces at Plataea. After return to Persia, Xerxes oversaw completion of Darius’ unfinished building projects at Susa and Persepolis. Assassinated in 465 by Artabanus, the commander of the royal bodyguard. Mardonius Son of Gobryas, one of the noblemen who had assisted Darius I in his ascent to the throne of Persia. Appointed general by Darius and sent to punish Athens for its support of the Ionian revolt. Mardonius recalled after fleet destroyed rounding Mount Athos and relieved of command. Returned to favour under Xerxes and spoke strongly in favour of the second expedition against Greece.
  • The Persian Wars

    The Persian Wars

    The Persian Wars The Limits of Empire And the Birth of a Greek World View Median Empire • Cyaxares: – Attacks Lydia in 590 BC. – On 28 May 585 BC. the war ends. • Astyages (585-550 BC.) – Married Aryenis in 585 BC. – Gave Mandane to Cambyses I before 580 BC. – Deserted by his troops and defeated by his grandson, Cyrus, in 550 BC. Cyrus the Great • King of Anshan in 560 BC. • Attacked Media in 550 BC. • Defeated Croesus of Lydia in 547/6 BC. • Defeated Babylon in 539 BC. • Died in 530 BC. attacking the Massagetae The Persian Empire Cambyses • King of Babylon by 27 March, 538 BC. • Great King in Sept, 530. • Invaded Egypt in 525. • Cambyses was “not in his right mind, but mad” (Hdt.3.25). • Died accidentally in 522 BC. • Succeeded by Smerdis, March 522 • Smerdis killed September 522 BC Darius I • Two years of rebellions: consolidated power by 520 BC. • Reorganization into 20 satrapies • Invaded Scythia via Europe in 513 • Satrapy in Europe, Skudra (Thrace) • Construction of Persepolis • 507: Accepted ‘Earth and Water’ from Athens. Empire of Darius I Persia in the Aegean The Ionian Revolt • Aristagoras, Tyrant of Cyzicus and Miletus – Convinced Persians to invade Naxos – Four month siege failed in 499 – Aristagoras and Histiaeus launch revolt of the Ionians Ionian Revolt • Cleomenes refused to participate • Athens contributed 20 ships – “Perhaps it is easier to fool a crowd…” (Hdt. V.97). – Sardis sacked, the temple of Cybele burned. – Ionian army defeated near Ephesus – Athenian aid withdrawn – Aristagoras killed in Thrace Ionian Revolt Persian Response • 498 • Took Byzantium, Chalcedon, the Troad, Lamponium, Lemnos and Imbros – Defeated the Ionian army at Ephesus – Took Clazomenae and Cyme • 497-494 – Besieged Miletus and campaigned in that area • 494 BC.