DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL REPORT Project Title: Design and Delivery of the Northern

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
FINAL REPORT Project Title: Design and Delivery of the Northern FINAL REPORT Project Title: Design and Delivery of the Northern Ontario Training and Consultation Session “Accessing & Interpreting Climate Change Information for Decision-Making in Northern Ontario Project Number: CCMM-1516-004 Recipient: Mining Innovation Rehabilitation and Applied Research Corporation (MIRARCO) Project End Date: November 30, 2015 Ministry Project Contact: Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change (MOECC) Environmental Monitoring and Reporting Branch 125 Resources Road, Toronto, Ontario, M9P 3V6 Dr. John Liu, Senior Science Advisor on Climate Change [email protected] Project Objective The Project objective was for the Recipient to develop and deliver a 1-day in person training session in Northern Ontario, with up to 50 participants. More specifically, the anticipated outcomes were to: a) Familiarize participants with key sources of climate data and climate change information, specific to Northern Ontario; b) Describe the mechanics of accessing and conducting basic manipulations of the data; c) Conduct a consultation exercise to gauge specific climate information needs of participants; d) Provide up-to-date, current information on the science of climate change in plain language for the broader public. Actions Undertaken Based on the positive feedback from attendees to the Toronto session, the Recipient delivered a training session in Sudbury to further engage provincial, municipal and other stakeholders and decision makers in Northern Ontario in the inclusion of climate change information in decision making. It also sought feedback on the extent to which climate change information is currently used, sources of that information and how the information can be improved in Northern Ontario. This Project supported the continued improvement of climate data communication and interpretation between climate scientists and practitioners. The training session was 6 hours in duration and was attended by 30 individuals, representing a range of fields and disciplines in municipal planning, policy development, conservation, natural resources management, and more. Invitations to the session were delivered to 16 separate organizations, with a reach of over 50 individuals, including: Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs; Ministry of Environment and Climate Change; Ministry of Northern Development and Mines; Ministry of Natural Resources and Forestry; Ministry of Transportation; Ministry of Municipal Affairs and Housing; Mattagami Region Conservation Authority; Nickel District Conservation Authority; North Bay-Mattawa Region Conservation Authority; Lakehead Region Conservation Authority; Sault Ste. Marie Region Conservation Authority; City of Sault Ste. Marie; City of Greater Sudbury; Greater Sudbury Climate Consortium; City of Greater Sudbury-Earth Care Sudbury Initiatives; and Ontario Forest and Research Institute. The sessions were located at Science North in Sudbury and were delivered in-person by members of the Project team. Niche expertise in the field of climate data information development and climate risk decision-making from Risk Sciences International (RSI) were applied through their sharing of content developed for a similar, previous training session held in Toronto. Their training material was expanded and tailored to suit the Northern Ontario context. This Recipient developed and delivered a training session that was: Tailored to Northern Ontario decision-makers with climate-sensitive portfolios, who are scientifically literate but non-experts with respect to climate and climate change; Designed to familiarize participants with key sources of climate and climate change information specific to Northern Ontario, including the mechanics of accessing and conducting basic manipulations of the data; Designed to provide key background information and facilitate exercises and discussions through welcomed questions and comments throughout the presentations. In total, 8 questions were asked from attendees and was captured by the note taker. The background information was related to: o Current climate and its historical trends and uncertainties; o Climate change modeling and theory, including but not limited to: . state of the science; . time/space resolution issues in modeled and empirical datasets and statistics; . characterizing climate means vs. climate extremes; Included a two-part series of case studies, focused on infrastructure and planning. The goal of the case studies was to provide examples of the application of climate data and climate information in practice throughout North American communities. Specifically, the case studies covered the following topics: o Legal implications to adapt o Policy and planning acts, climate change tradeoffs o Requirements for resilient communities, infrastructure and landscapes o Future risks o Reducing climate risks o Examples of projections and adaptation put into practice o Municipal and land use planning o Engineering forensics, codes, and standards 2 Design and Delivery of the Northern Ontario Training and Consultation Session “Accessing & Interpreting Climate Change Information for Decision-Making in Northern Ontario CCMM-1516-004 – Final Report MIRARCO/OCCIAR o Extreme rainfall events – design values, ecosystem services o Climate services in support of adaptation Use of climate model ensembles in decision-making, including but not limited to: o what can and cannot be “answered” using climate model ensembles and other approaches to identifying climatic change; o implications of, and tricks and challenges of working with climate means versus climate extremes in decision-making; and, o characterization of uncertainties. Consultative to gauge specific climate information needs of participants through a 45-minute discussion period. Participants were provided a list of five questions two days prior to the session in order to prepare and encourage them to reflect on their climate information needs throughout the training session (see Appendix A for the list of questions). The stakeholder consultation was facilitated by Al Douglas who posed each question to the group; the discussion and responses were captured by a note taker. The format of the discussion was designed to encourage idea-sharing and interaction among participants and held no limitation on the time or extent to which they could comment/provide feedback. The Recipient also developed and delivered a public information session that provided information on the science of climate change in simpler terms designed for a broad public audience. The public information session took place over 1 hour in the evening on the same day as the training session and was attended by 21 members of the public Performance Measures and Targets The following table outline the project objectives and expectations, and provides an explanation of the performance results. Performance Performance Performance Results Measures Targets Number of 50 30 participants at the 16 organizations; 45 people were invited. With general training session circulation included, the invitation had a reach of over 50 people. 29 people registered for the event 27 attended the event Course evaluation 20 22 forms completed for the training session Course evaluation Participants Participants were asked to rate their level of knowledge on forms for the improved their the source of climate data and climate information prior to training session knowledge on the session and again upon completing the session, on a current status of scale from ‘very poor’ to ‘excellent’. climate science in Prior to taking the course, almost half of participants Ontario, climate responded as having a ‘fair’ level of knowledge (45 per cent). However, upon completing the course, this 3 Design and Delivery of the Northern Ontario Training and Consultation Session “Accessing & Interpreting Climate Change Information for Decision-Making in Northern Ontario CCMM-1516-004 – Final Report MIRARCO/OCCIAR data availability and number dropped to 4 per cent, and the number of application. responses for ‘good’ increased from 23 per cent to 45 per cent. One respondent provided the following comment: “I have a clearer understanding of complex issues/data”. Seventy-seven per cent of participants would recommend the course to others. Course evaluation 5-10 specific Specific climate information needs were polled during the forms current climate stakeholder consultation. The following question was information needs asked: what additional material would you like presented in the course? More information targeted for policy-making; Examples from a broad number of sectors (forestry, mining, potential climate change impacts); Examples of success stories; A close walk-through of another municipality example; Help on municipal adaptation plans; A focus on how climate change impacts industry in northern Ontario; Data related information applied at a local scale; Ecosystem sustainability; Sector-specific data-related applications. Consultation/disc 5-10 current Question: ussion climate What resources do you need to manage climate change information needs uncertainties in your decision-making? E.g. web-based content for general or specific information, information extension services, risk management frameworks, etc. Communication, education and outreach; Online resources; Posters or information sheets for communities, similar to those resources that are provided to teachers; Resources for communicating climate change information; Synonyms or alternate terms
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Greater Sudbury Source Protection Area
    GREATER SUDBURY SOURCE PROTECTION AREA UPDATED SOURCE PROTECTION PLAN PREPARED ON BEHALF OF THE GREATER SUDBURY SOURCE PROTECTION COMMITTEE UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT, 2006 (ONTARIO REGULATION 287/07) IN EFFECT AS OF MARCH 16, 2021 The following amendments have been made to the original document Date Type of Amendment Description March 16, 2021 Amendment resulting Policy PL1EF-SA and PL2F-SA were added to from the review under manage the establishment and operation of liquid Section 36 of the Clean hydrocarbon pipelines where this activity could Water Act, 2006. pose a significant threat to drinking water. Update to Policy M1EF-M to include a sampling frequency for monitoring sodium and phosphorus. Update to Policies Sa1EF-EO and S8EF-EO to incorporate additional outreach methods. Update to Map 7.1 to incorporate additional wells brought online during the development of the Source Protection Plan. March 2018 Minor/Typographical Map 1.2: The vulnerability score for the lake amendment under O. bottom was corrected to “9”. Reg 287/07 section Map 2.2: The Intake Protection Zone 3 was 51(6) amended to correct buffers around regulated areas. Greater Sudbury Source Protection Plan EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A Plan to Protect Municipal Drinking Water Sources in the Greater Sudbury Watersheds Drinking water in Ontario comes from both surface water and groundwater sources which can be contaminated from human activities and natural processes. The Clean Water Act, 2006 was created by the Government of Ontario to protect drinking water sources. The Act includes provisions for the development and implementation of local Source Protection Plans to protect sources of municipal residential drinking water.
    [Show full text]
  • Statistics Guide
    1 | P a g e TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT GREATER SUDBURY ................................................................................................................................................. 1 GREATER SUDBURY CMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 POPULATION ........................................................................................................................................ 2 AGE CHARACTERISTICS ........................................................................................................................... 3 HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................................................ 4 MARITAL STATUS .................................................................................................................................. 4 FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................................................................................... 5 2016 NATIONAL HOUSEHOLD SURVEY ................................................................................................................................. 6 GREATER SUDBURY CMA ..................................................................................................................................................... 6 EDUCATION .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rank of Pops
    Table 1.3 Basic Pop Trends County by County Census 2001 - place names pop_1996 pop_2001 % diff rank order absolute 1996-01 Sorted by absolute pop growth on growth pop growth - Canada 28,846,761 30,007,094 1,160,333 4.0 - Ontario 10,753,573 11,410,046 656,473 6.1 - York Regional Municipality 1 592,445 729,254 136,809 23.1 - Peel Regional Municipality 2 852,526 988,948 136,422 16.0 - Toronto Division 3 2,385,421 2,481,494 96,073 4.0 - Ottawa Division 4 721,136 774,072 52,936 7.3 - Durham Regional Municipality 5 458,616 506,901 48,285 10.5 - Simcoe County 6 329,865 377,050 47,185 14.3 - Halton Regional Municipality 7 339,875 375,229 35,354 10.4 - Waterloo Regional Municipality 8 405,435 438,515 33,080 8.2 - Essex County 9 350,329 374,975 24,646 7.0 - Hamilton Division 10 467,799 490,268 22,469 4.8 - Wellington County 11 171,406 187,313 15,907 9.3 - Middlesex County 12 389,616 403,185 13,569 3.5 - Niagara Regional Municipality 13 403,504 410,574 7,070 1.8 - Dufferin County 14 45,657 51,013 5,356 11.7 - Brant County 15 114,564 118,485 3,921 3.4 - Northumberland County 16 74,437 77,497 3,060 4.1 - Lanark County 17 59,845 62,495 2,650 4.4 - Muskoka District Municipality 18 50,463 53,106 2,643 5.2 - Prescott and Russell United Counties 19 74,013 76,446 2,433 3.3 - Peterborough County 20 123,448 125,856 2,408 2.0 - Elgin County 21 79,159 81,553 2,394 3.0 - Frontenac County 22 136,365 138,606 2,241 1.6 - Oxford County 23 97,142 99,270 2,128 2.2 - Haldimand-Norfolk Regional Municipality 24 102,575 104,670 2,095 2.0 - Perth County 25 72,106 73,675
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 OMBI Public Report
    Musk of Toronto • Regi urham • 2007Regional Performa ce Benchmarking Municipality Report TABLE OF CONTENTS tawa • Regional Municipality of Peel • City of Windsor • RegionalLETTER FROM THE Municipality CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS of York AND CITY • MANAGERS County .. .......... of Brant 1 INTRODUCTION .. ............................................................. 3 City of London •THE District OMBI BENCHMARKING of Muskoka PROCESS............................................. • Regional Municipal 5 • City of Thunder2007 COMPARATIVE Bay RESULTS • City of Toronto • Regional Munici • Regional Municipality WHO DOES of WHAT?............................................. Durham • Regional Municipalit. 10 HOW TO READ THE GRAPHS .. ................................... 11 ality of Niagara • City1 Building of ServicesOttawa .. ............................................. • Regional Municipality. 12 o ality of Waterloo • 2City By-law ofEnforcement Windsor Services . .• . .Regional . .Municipality . 15 3 Child Care Services. 18 f Halton • City of Hamilton • City of London • District of M 4 Culture Services .. .............................................. 21 of Peel • City5 ofEmergency Greater Medical Services Sudbury . .• . .City . .of . .Thunder . 24 Bay • C 6 Fire Services .. ................................................. 28 cipality of York 7• CountyHostel Services .................................................of Brant • Regional Municipality. 32 8 Library Services .. .............................................. 35 t of Muskoka • Regional9
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Sudbury Film Guidelines
    Greater Sudbury Film Guidelines A step-by-step guide to filming in Greater Sudbury Last revised July 3, 2020 Contents WELCOME .................................................................................................................... 3 1.0. The Film Industry in Greater Sudbury ..................................................................... 3 1.1. Community Profile .................................................................................................. 3 FILM POLICY ................................................................................................................. 4 2.0. Policy Statement ..................................................................................................... 4 2.1. Purpose ................................................................................................................... 4 2.2. Applicability ....................................................................................................... 4 2.3. Municipal Support ................................................................................................... 4 2.4. Key Contact ............................................................................................................ 4 FILM PERMITS .............................................................................................................. 5 3.0. Application Process ................................................................................................. 5 FILM PERMIT DETAILS & CONDITIONS .....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Peterborough Green Economy Action Lab
    CSD17-022 - Attachment A The Peterborough Green Economy Action Lab Moving Towards Action August 2017 CSD17-022 - Attachment A Acknowledgements Thank you to the Peterborough Steering Committee members Ken Doherty and Melanie Kawalec, City of Peterborough; Sandra Dueck, Greater Peterborough Chamber of Commerce; John Good, Community Foundation of Greater Peterborough; and Rhonda Keenan, Peterborough & the Kawarthas Economic Development for their ongoing support, insights and commitment. As well as Jenn McCallum, GreenUP for her report writing support. Thank you to the many stakeholders across the Peterborough region who took the time to speak, meet and think with us as part of the Mid-Sized Cities (MSC) Program. Your time, experience and learnings made this work possible. 2 CSD17-022 - Attachment A Table of Contents Purpose of this Report ........................................................................................................3 Peterborough Green Economy Action Lab Executive Summary .............4 About the Lab ........................................................................................................................................................4 Objectives of the Action Lab Workshop......................................................................................4 Agenda of the Workshop............................................................................................................................4 Potential Green Economy Actions for Peterborough .................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Sudbury a Leading Destination in Northern Ontario
    For Immediate Release Greater Sudbury a leading destination in Northern Ontario Greater Sudbury continues to demonstrate strength in supporting education and employment success January 31, 2017 – Greater Sudbury should build on their role as a leader in education and skills enhancement – particularly for Indigenous and newcomer populations. That is the message coming out of the newest report from the Northern Projections: Human Capital Series, a partnership between Northern Policy Institute and Northern Ontario Workforce Planning Boards. The new report by Dr. Bahktiar Moazzami and James Cuddy found that Greater Sudbury is in a better position than any other census district in Northern Ontario to meet current and future skills requirements. Recent investments in post-secondary institutions in Greater Sudbury indicate a collective awareness of this opportunity. Perhaps even more noteworthy is the fact that it has the highest human capital index – ability to develop and utilize talent - for Indigenous and newcomer populations not only in all of Northern Ontario, but also provincially and nationally. Today, Greater Sudbury has the highest number of newcomers per capita compared to other census districts in Northern Ontario. While these are positive signs, the city’s total population is expected to remain largely constant from 2013 to 2041, with the labour force expected to decline by about 14 percent during that same period. “With significant numbers of unemployed and underemployed new Canadians in the Greater Toronto Area, there is a real opportunity for Greater Sudbury to address its population challenges by playing to its demonstrated strength in supporting newcomer success,” states Reggie Caverson, Executive Director, Workforce Planning for Sudbury and Manitoulin.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Matters Across Canada, Visit Canada.Ca/Immigration-Matters
    Economic Profile Series: Sudbury, Ontario Spring 2020 This series looks at select communities across Canada and highlights key labour market statistics and the role that immigration has played, or could play, to help these communities flourish. It is important to note that predicting future labour market demand can be challenging as economies are always evolving. -31099-2 This profile uses current population and labour market trends to give a profile of how immigration might play a role in this community. 660 Ensuring Greater Sudbury remains an economic engine for Northern Ontario: the role of immigration The 2016 Census reported that more than 1 in 5 people in the Greater Sudbury workforce were over Figure 1: Share of the Greater Sudbury workforce over the age of 55—selected industries the age of 55. More than 30% of transportation sector workers were over the age of 55, and 27% Transportation 31% in the public administration, professional services Finance and insurance 27% and finance sectors were close to retirement (Figure 1). Professional services 27% Public administration 27% There are not enough young people coming Other services 25% through the education system to meet the demand Mining 19% No. Ci4-193/16-2019E-PDF Cat. ISBN 978-0- of the current labour market, let alone provide the workforce for future economic growth. Source: Statistics Canada, 2016 Census. Greater Sudbury: an important urban economy in Ontario Greater Sudbury (population 171,000)1 is the largest urban centre by population in Northern Ontario. The municipality is the second largest by land area in Canada. As a major mining centre, Sudbury plays an important role in the economy not only of Ontario, but Canada overall.
    [Show full text]
  • Cities and Biodiversity Case Study Series
    Cities and Biodiversity Case Study Series Canadian Best Practices in Local Biodiversity Management . Front and back cover image: “Kelowna.”/Flickr Pompeii Am Götterdämmerug Inset image: “Reserva Nacional Nahanni.” Flickr/viajeacanada © 2010, ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability Edmonton Greater Sudbury Guelph Dehcho First Nations Greater Sudbury Toronto Trois-Rivières Winnipeg Calgary Mon- tréal Kelowna Guelph Edmonton Greater Sudbury Dehcho First Nations Wolfville Toronto Trois-Rivières Winnipeg Calgary Montréal Kelowna Edmonton Greater Sudbury Guelph Dehcho First Nations Wolfville Toronto Trois-Rivières Winnipeg Cal- gary Montréal Kelowna Edmonton Greater Sudbury Guelph Dehcho First Nations Wolfville Toronto Trois-Rivières Winnipeg Calgary Montréal Kelowna Edmonton Greater Sudbury Guelph Dehcho First Nations Wolfville Toronto Trois-Rivières Winni- peg Calgary Montréal Kelowna Edmonton Calgary Montréal Kelowna Edmonton Greater Sudbury Guelph Dehcho First Na- tions Guelph Dehcho First Nations Dehcho Edmonton Greater Sudbury Guelph Dehcho First Nations Greater Sudbury To- ronto Trois-Rivières Winnipeg Calgary Montréal Kelowna Guelph Edmonton Greater Sudbury Dehcho First Nations Wolfville Table of Contents Setting the Context An Introduction 1 Shift in Perspective: From Global to Local 1 Urban Biodiversity and the Role of Local Governments 2 About This Publication 3 City of Calgary 4 Creating a Biodiversity Strategy Based on Past Experiences Dehcho First Nations 6 Local Native Community Works to Protect National Treasure City of
    [Show full text]
  • OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020)
    OMERS Employer Listing (As at December 31, 2020) The information provided in this chart is based on data provided to the OMERS Administration Corporation and is current until December 31, 2020. There are 986 employers on this listing with a total of 288,703 active members (30,067 NRA 60 active members and 258,636 NRA 65 active members). Are you looking for a previous employer to determine your eligibility for membership in the OMERS Primary Pension Plan? If you think your previous employer was an OMERS employer but you don’t see it on this list, contact OMERS Client Services at 416-369-2444 or 1-800-387-0813. Your previous employer could be related to or amalgamated with another OMERS employer and not listed separately here. Number of Active Members Employer Name NRA 60 NRA 65 Total 1627596 ONTARIO INC. * * 519 CHURCH STREET COMMUNITY CENTRE 48 48 AJAX MUNICIPAL HOUSING CORPORATION * * AJAX PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 42 42 ALECTRA ENERGY SERVICES * * ALECTRA ENERGY SOLUTIONS INC. * * ALECTRA INC. * * ALECTRA POWER SERVICES INC. * * ALECTRA UTILITIES CORPORATION 1,283 1,283 ALGOMA DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 522 522 ALGOMA DISTRICT SERVICES ADMINISTRATION BOARD 120 120 ALGOMA HEALTH UNIT 178 178 ALGOMA MANOR NURSING HOME 69 69 ALGONQUIN AND LAKESHORE CATHOLIC DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 558 558 ALMISE CO-OPERATIVE HOMES INC. * * ALSTOM TRANSPORT CANADA 45 45 APPLEGROVE COMMUNITY COMPLEX * * ART GALLERY OF BURLINGTON * * ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPAL MANAGERS, CLERKS AND TREASURERS OF * * ONTARIO ASSOCIATION OF MUNICIPALITIES OF ONTARIO 42 42 ATIKOKAN HYDRO INC * * AU CHATEAU HOME FOR THE AGED 214 214 AVON MAITLAND DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD 745 745 AYLMER POLICE SERVICES BOARD * * * BELLEVILLE PUBLIC LIBRARY BOARD 29 29 * at least one of NRA 60 or NRA 65 number of active members is less than 25 The information is used for pension administration purposes, and may not be appropriate for other purposes, and is current to December 31, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Opioid-Related Data City of Barrie
    OPIOID POISONING DATA CITY OF BARRIE By: John Barbaro Epidemiologist, Population Health Assessment and Surveillance Team, Simcoe Muskoka District Health Unit Date: Thursday October, 3rd, 2019 For: safe Barrie SMDHU.ORG Objectives • Data Sources & Definitions • Trends & Comparisons • Maps Source: SMDHU.ORG Data sources • Opioid-related mortality from the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario • Opioid poisoning emergency department visits from the Canadian Institute for Health Information • Suspected opioid overdose ambulance calls from the County of Simcoe Paramedic Services Source: SMDHU.ORG Opioid-Related Deaths • Maintained by the Office of the Chief Coroner of Ontario. • An acute poisoning death resulting from the direct contribution of consumed substance(s), where one or more of the substances was an opioid, regardless of how the opioid was obtained. Includes intentional and unintentional deaths. Deaths can be attributed to more than one opioid. • Geography for deaths can be assigned based on the location of the incident/death OR the residential address of the decedent. • Currently the 2018 and 2019 data are considered preliminary and subject to change. Data is available up-to the first quarter of 2019. • Opioid-related deaths data is not available for geographies smaller than Municipality (i.e. no information available about where these incidents occurred within the City of Barrie). SMDHU.ORG Opioid-Poisoning Emergency Visits • Maintained by Canadian Institute of Health Information (CIHI) and accessed through IntelliHEALTH ONTARIO maintained by the Ontario Ministry of Health. • Includes unscheduled emergency department visits where opioid poisoning was recorded as the main or other problem diagnosis. Includes intentional and unintentional opioid-poisoning visits.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Mid-Sized the Right Size: Re-Envisioning Success in Ontario's Mid-Sized Cities
    DISCUSSION PAPER Making Mid-Sized the Right Size: Re-envisioning Success in Ontario’s Mid-Sized Cities Acknowledgements 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS his paper was prepared by Jo Flatt, Kris Longston, Acting Manager of Community & Senior Program Manager, Evergreen Strategic Planning, City of Greater Sudbury, Greater T Sudbury and Luisa Sotomayor. Deb McIntosh, Councilor, Ward 9, Greater Sudbury We would like to thank all of the interview participants for their time and effort in Sarah Meritt, Manager, Old East Village Business contributing to the development of this report, Association (OEVBIA), London as well as Ian Bromley for reviewing the paper. Debbi Nicholson, CEO, Greater Sudbury Chamber of This report is funded by the Ministry of Municipal Commerce, Greater Sudbury Affairs and House within the Province of Ontario. Acknowledgements Liz Palmieri, Executive Director, Niagara Community Foundation, St. Catharines Interview Participants: Judy Pihach, Manager, Planning and Development Services, City of St. Catharines, St. Catharines Michelle Baldwin, Executive Director, David Robinson, Director of the Institute for Northern Pillar Non-Profit Network, London Ontario Research and Development, Laurentian Mayor Brian Bigger, Greater Sudbury University, Greater Sudbury Ken Doherty, Director, Community Services, Brianna Salmon, Manager, Transportation and Urban City of Peterborough, Peterborough Design Programmes, Peterborough Sandra Dueck, Policy Analyst, Greater Peterborough Mayor Walter Sendzik, St. Catharines Chamber of Commerce, Peterborough Carmen
    [Show full text]