DOCSLIB.ORG

Punctuality for June 2020 Per Airline

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Punctuality for June 2020 Per Airline Punctuality for june 2020 per airline Departures scheduled *) Delayed more than 15 minutes. **) Airlines having less than 10 operations. Avg. Planned Flown Cancelled Flown Delayed *) Punctuality Airline delay (number) (number) (number) (%) (number) (%) (min) Air Baltic 43 43 0 100% 2 95% 28 Air France 26 26 0 100% 8 69% 22 Atlantic 35 31 4 89% 4 89% 29 Airways British Airways 13 13 0 100% 1 92% 28 Croatia 28 28 0 100% 1 96% 30 Airlines Dat 157 156 1 99% 15 90% 46 Finnair 51 49 2 96% 2 96% 84 Icelandair 21 21 0 100% 7 67% 25 Klm Royal Dutch 33 33 0 100% 3 91% 23 Airlines Lufthansa 76 76 0 100% 6 92% 19 Qatar Airways 18 17 1 94% 2 89% 20 Ryanair Ltd 12 12 0 100% 6 50% 57 Scandinavian 492 492 0 100% 45 91% 34 Airlines Swiss International 18 18 0 100% 5 72% 42 Airlines Test Operator 11 0 11 0% 0 100% 0 Turkish 14 12 2 86% 1 93% 42 Airlines Wizz Air Ltd 25 22 3 88% 13 48% 35 Others **) 76 62 14 82% 15 80% 41 1 Arrivals scheduled *) Delayed more than 15 minutes. **) Airlines having less than 10 operations. Avg. Planned Flown Cancelled Flown Delayed *) Punctuality Airline delay (number) (number) (number) (%) (number) (%) (min) Air Baltic 43 43 0 100% 2 95% 35 Air France 26 26 0 100% 4 85% 21 Air Greenland 13 13 0 100% 5 62% 46 Atlantic 35 31 4 89% 1 97% 18 Airways British Airways 13 13 0 100% 1 92% 36 Croatia 28 28 0 100% 0 100% 0 Airlines Dat 159 156 3 98% 13 92% 39 Finnair 51 49 2 96% 1 98% 47 Icelandair 21 21 0 100% 1 95% 35 Klm Royal Dutch 33 33 0 100% 0 100% 0 Airlines Lufthansa 76 76 0 100% 5 93% 22 Qatar Airways 18 17 1 94% 0 100% 0 Ryanair Ltd 12 12 0 100% 1 92% 19 Scandinavian 489 488 1 100% 25 95% 34 Airlines Swiss International 18 18 0 100% 3 83% 44 Airlines Test Operator 10 0 10 0% 0 100% 0 Turkish 14 12 2 86% 1 93% 19 Airlines Wizz Air Ltd 25 22 3 88% 5 80% 32 Others **) 67 54 13 81% 7 90% 41 2 Departures charter *) Delayed more than 15 minutes. **) Airlines having less than 10 operations. Avg. Planned Flown Cancelled Flown Delayed *) Punctuality Airline delay (number) (number) (number) (%) (number) (%) (min) Others **) 37 18 19 49% 6 84% 117 3 Arrivals charter *) Delayed more than 15 minutes. **) Airlines having less than 10 operations. Avg. Planned Flown Cancelled Flown Delayed *) Punctuality Airline delay (number) (number) (number) (%) (number) (%) (min) Others **) 38 20 18 53% 9 76% 58 4 Departures total *) Delayed more than 15 minutes. **) Airlines having less than 10 operations. Avg. Planned Flown Cancelled Flown Delayed *) Punctuality Airline delay (number) (number) (number) (%) (number) (%) (min) Air Baltic 43 43 0 100% 2 95% 28 Air France 26 26 0 100% 8 69% 22 Air Greenland 14 14 0 100% 4 71% 46 Atlantic 37 32 5 86% 5 86% 83 Airways British Airways 13 13 0 100% 1 92% 28 Croatia 28 28 0 100% 1 96% 30 Airlines Dat 159 156 3 98% 15 91% 46 Finnair 51 49 2 96% 2 96% 84 Icelandair 21 21 0 100% 7 67% 25 Klm Royal Dutch 33 33 0 100% 3 91% 23 Airlines Lufthansa 76 76 0 100% 6 92% 19 Qatar Airways 18 17 1 94% 2 89% 20 Ryanair Ltd 12 12 0 100% 6 50% 57 Scandinavian 499 492 7 99% 45 91% 34 Airlines Swiss International 18 18 0 100% 5 72% 42 Airlines Test Operator 11 0 11 0% 0 100% 0 Turkish 14 12 2 86% 1 93% 42 Airlines Wizz Air Ltd 25 22 3 88% 13 48% 35 Others **) 88 65 23 74% 16 82% 52 5 Arrivals total *) Delayed more than 15 minutes. **) Airlines having less than 10 operations. Avg. Planned Flown Cancelled Flown Delayed *) Punctuality Airline delay (number) (number) (number) (%) (number) (%) (min) Air Baltic 43 43 0 100% 2 95% 35 Air France 26 26 0 100% 4 85% 21 Air Greenland 14 14 0 100% 5 64% 46 Atlantic 40 33 7 83% 3 93% 24 Airways British Airways 13 13 0 100% 1 92% 36 Croatia 28 28 0 100% 0 100% 0 Airlines Dat 161 156 5 97% 13 92% 39 Finnair 51 49 2 96% 1 98% 47 Icelandair 21 21 0 100% 1 95% 35 Klm Royal Dutch 33 33 0 100% 0 100% 0 Airlines Lufthansa 76 76 0 100% 5 93% 22 Qatar Airways 18 17 1 94% 0 100% 0 Ryanair Ltd 12 12 0 100% 1 92% 19 Scandinavian 492 488 4 99% 25 95% 34 Airlines Swiss International 18 18 0 100% 3 83% 44 Airlines Test Operator 10 0 10 0% 0 100% 0 Turkish 14 12 2 86% 1 93% 19 Airlines Wizz Air Ltd 25 22 3 88% 5 80% 32 Others **) 94 71 23 76% 14 85% 54 6.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • UK Fare Comparison Summary Fares – Ryanair Vs. Easyjet Sep Oct Nov
    UK Fare Comparison Summary Source: QL2 http://www.ql2.com Data collected on: 28/08/2015 Type of fare Basic fare, one way Currency € - Conversion made by QL2. (GBP fx 1.377) Period analyzed: 12th September '15 -11th January '16 Ryanair Vs Easyjet Airport to Airport Ryanair 28% cheaper on average % of total routes analyzed Ryanair 7.46%, Easyjet 6.99% Ryanair & Easyjet average fare from the UK Total average fare by month Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Total £ Ryanair €124.7 €87.6 €45.6 €59.2 €76.3 €77.6 £56.39 Easyjet €149.6 €117.4 €77.0 €86.2 €98.8 €107.2 £77.88 1.377 FX used -17% -25% -41% -31% -23% -28% Fares – Ryanair vs. easyJet Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan LanzaroteBristol Ryanair €167.6 €158.1 €87.6 €123.5 €143.6 Easyjet €188.7 €222.6 €128.3 €148.7 €208.6 LanzaroteLiverpool Ryanair €178.1 €162.4 €93.6 €106.3 €138.3 Easyjet €187.0 €231.1 €155.8 €181.7 €226.7 MalagaBristol Ryanair €139.4 €75.2 €50.0 €71.9 €89.2 Easyjet €158.1 €113.4 €85.0 €101.8 €115.2 MalagaLiverpool Ryanair €171.6 €114.9 €74.6 €70.5 €92.4 Easyjet €192.3 €138.0 €97.1 €98.7 €111.8 MalagaManchester Ryanair €182.9 €121.3 €78.1 €80.2 €90.6 Easyjet €206.6 €146.9 €97.8 €110.5 €121.8 MalagaStansted Ryanair €140.7 €83.8 €42.6 €65.0 €75.5 Easyjet €161.7 €105.2 €69.9 €90.1 €98.9 AlicanteBristol Ryanair €146.8 €90.8 €74.2 €79.5 €98.1 Easyjet €169.0 €134.0 €114.2 €93.7 €123.0 AlicanteEdinburgh Ryanair €171.7 €160.2 €89.8 €100.7 €137.6 Easyjet €188.5 €192.6 €118.1 €107.7 €148.0 AlicanteLiverpool Ryanair €165.3 €132.6 €97.6 €72.1 €103.2 Easyjet €172.2 €143.0 €106.6 €105.9 €129.8 AlicanteManchester
    [Show full text]
  • ICE 90620 IS Uppfaera Saga Lounge Skjal 11.Indd
    Saga Lounge Keflavík Airport DO YOU HAVE ACCESS TO THE ICELANDAIR SAGA LOUNGE? Saga Premium Premium Vildarkort passengers Landsbankans Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Icelandair Saga Gold Premium Vildar viðskiptakort Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Landsbankans Can I invite guests? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Yes Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Icelandair Saga Silver Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes World Elite Mastercard Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � Yes – Issued by Arion Bank Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Mastercard Icelandair Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Business – Issued by Kreditkort Platinum Business Travel Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes – Issued by Arion Bank Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Mastercard Icelandair Platinum Business Platinum Card – Issued by Kreditkort – Issued by Kvika Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � � � � Yes Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Can I invite a guest? � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � No Mastercard Icelandair Premium – Issued by Kreditkort Access to Saga Lounge � � � � � � �
    [Show full text]
  • CTA Carriers US DOT Carriers
    CTA Carriers The Canadian Transportation Agency (CTA) has defined the application and disclosure of interline baggage rules for travel to or from Canada for tickets issued on or after 1 April 2015. The CTA website offers a list of carriers filing tariffs with the CTA at https://www.otc-cta.gc.ca/eng/carriers-who-file-tariffs-agency. US DOT Carriers The following is a list of carriers that currently file general rule tariffs applicable for travel to/from the United States. This list should be used by subscribers of ATPCO’s Baggage product for determining baggage selection rules for travel to/from the United States. For international journeys to/from the United States, the first marketing carrier’s rules apply. The marketing carrier selected must file general rules tariffs to/from the United States. Systems and data providers should maintain a list based on the carriers listed below to determine whether the first marketing carrier on the journey files tariffs (US DOT carrier). Effective Date: 14AUG17 Code Carrier Code Carrier 2K Aerolineas Galapagos (AeroGal) AA American Airlines 3P Tiara Air Aruba AB Air Berlin 3U Sichuan Airlines AC Air Canada 4C LAN Colombia AD Azul Linhas Aereas Brasileiras 4M LAN Argentina AF Air France 4O ABC Aerolineas S.A. de C.V. AG Aruba Airlines 4V BVI Airways AI Air India 5J Cebu Pacific Air AM Aeromexico 7I Insel Air AR Aerolineas Argentinas 7N Pan American World Airways Dominicana AS Alaska Airlines 7Q Elite Airways LLC AT Royal Air Maroc 8I Inselair Aruba AV Avianca 9V Avoir Airlines AY Finnair 9W Jet Airways AZ Alitalia A3 Aegean Airlines B0 Dreamjet SAS d/b/a La Compagnie Page 1 Revised 31 July 2017 Code Carrier Code Carrier B6 JetBlue Airways GL Air Greenland BA British Airways HA Hawaiian Airlines BE Flybe Group HM Air Seychelles Ltd BG Biman Bangladesh Airlines HU Hainan Airlines BR Eva Airways HX Hong Kong Airlines Limited BT Air Baltic HY Uzbekistan Airways BW Caribbean Airlines IB Iberia CA Air China IG Meridiana CI China Airlines J2 Azerbaijan Airways CM Copa Airlines JD Beijing Capital Airlines Co., Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • Ryanair Terminal Rome Ciampino
    Ryanair Terminal Rome Ciampino If unphilosophic or scummy Barron usually dribble his zamias spancels spiritually or lights colonially and numerously, how equalized is Gustav? Staminal Montgomery rumpuses: he codifies his therblig innocuously and resolvedly. Unstamped Fitz unprisons granularly. Your trip to shoot the main train from ciampino airport is the rome ciampino terminal ryanair In five long tunnels connecting the Metro and the bush and the Bus terminals. Ryanair Rome Ciampino airport closed because of escape fire will flights be delayed or cancelled I'm supposed to creep on flight FR6106 to Brussels at 930 but no. Which does really helpful a glassed off area improve the survey main background building. While a relatively small facility Rome Ciampino Airport CIA serves a. Download this next image ryanair flight at ciampino airport in rome italy AP33W7. RyanAir German Wings and WizzAir among others fly out of Terminal 2. Fly from Rome Ciampino to Manchester on Ryanair from 40. Southeast of Rome city centre is used by budget airline Ryanair as well below other. 6 million passengers offering flights from low-cost companies like Ryanair and Wizz Air. How people Negotiate Ciampino airport Rome. If one are changing your flight tonight or night we will waive the flight change fee away you bear be charged any price difference between the real fare paid thinking the lowest total price available on research new guide Please note that equity the farefees on via new he is lower tax refund will be made. Blue Air Eurowings-Germanwings Pegasus Airlines Ryanair Wizzair will i place card Terminal 3 Terminal 2 will remain closed to.
    [Show full text]
  • Air France KLM Martinair Cargo and Bolloré Logistics Team up to Launch the First Low-Carbon Airfreight Route Between France and the United States
    Press release Puteaux, 21 January 2021 Air France KLM Martinair Cargo and Bolloré Logistics team up to launch the first low-carbon airfreight route between France and the United States Bolloré Logistics has joined the Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) programme of Air France KLM Martinair Cargo (AFKLMP Cargo) for its 2021 shipments between Paris Charles de Gaulle and New York John F. Kennedy airports. This first of its kind collaboration illustrates the ambition of these two historical partners to tackle the environmental challenge of airfreight transportation. Christophe Boucher, EVP Air France Cargo says: “The Cargo SAF Programme enables shippers and forwarders to power a percentage of their flights with SAF. Customers determine their own level of engagement and we ensure that their entire investment is used for sourcing SAF. I’m delighted to see the speed at which Air France KLM Martinair Cargo and Bolloré Logistics have come to an agreement on the use of our SAF programme, launched a few weeks ago. I’m proud that together we are trendsetters in a field that will grow in our companies and in society.” This innovative aviation fuel will cut CO₂ emissions by at least 50% on airfreight shipped by Bolloré Logistics on this symbolic trade lane. Investing in this strategic route represents a new step towards achieving greater sustainability in the future for both Bolloré Logistics and AFKLMP Cargo. “Reducing carbon emissions is a major challenge in the airfreight transportation industry and Bolloré Logistics is committed to addressing this with innovative solutions. In 2021, the company has committed itself to reducing scope 3 CO₂ emissions linked to the performance of its transport services by 30% by 2030.
    [Show full text]
  • Voluntary Carbon Offsetting 44 1-3%
    FACT SHEET #11 / NOVEMBER 2020 VOLUNTARY CARBON OFFSETTING A number of airlines already offer voluntary carbon offsetting for passengers, how do they work? Each flight produces carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and whilst there are a lot of things being done by airlines to reduce the fuel use and CO2 emissions, often passengers would like to know how they can help lower the CO2 footprint of their travel. Voluntary carbon offsetting is one option available to passengers, either through an airline programme directly, or a third-party offset provider. What are offsets? 44 A large number of corporate travellers The name ‘offset’ can cover a variety of sources of CO2 reduction. It is a way to compensate for CO2 being produced airlines offer and individual in one area, by helping to fund a project which reduces CO2 in voluntary carbon passengers will another area. offsetting offset through third- programmes to party providers: we For example, if a passenger’s flight produces 2 tonnes of passengers. have no visibility CO2, they can choose to help fund a project which provides renewable energy to replace 2 tonnes of fossil fuel-related Half of the world’s 20 on the uptake of CO2 production. largest airlines offer offsets through these offsetting. sources. This is an offset, or a ‘carbon credit’. Most credits / offsets are in units of one tonne of CO2 and they can be generated by a range of different programmes around the world, in renewable energy, forestry and eventually they may be available in carbon capture, using technology to literally draw CO2 out of the 1-3% atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Bsc Business Administration
    BSc Business Administration How have current market conditions affected Icelandic airlines compared to international competitors and how to they perform differently? December 2018 Student: Þórunn Andrésdóttir Kt: 160493-2759 Instructor: Katrín Ólafsdóttir Scanned with CamScanner Abstract The behavior of the commercial aviation market has changed greatly in the last 4 decade which has caused the market to shift from an oligopoly market to a monopolistic competitive market. This shift has increased competition in the market as low-cost carriers, budget airlines, have entered the market causing the prices of airfare to drop. With increased competition on the market and new airlines entering the market with innovative ideas, it has created operation difficulties for airlines in the market. In particular the Icelandic airlines, as airline expenses have steadily been increasing. Rising jet fuel prices, increasing average wages and exchange rate deficit are among the changes in the market that are weighing heavily on airlines expenses. This thesis discusses how these market factors affect the Icelandic airlines and how their performance is different compared to the competition in the market. The analysis that was conducted showed that the Icelandic airlines spend more on jet fuel and employee’s salary than their competition. However, Icelandair’s unit cost was the second lowest in the analysis which indicates that the airline is more likely to survive if there will be a major decrease in airfare demand in the market. Key words: commercial aviation, Icelandic airlines, jet fuel, average wages, CASK, transatlantic routes. Preface This final project is a 12 ECTS thesis for a BSc degree in Business Administration at Reykjavík University.
    [Show full text]
  • New Expanded Joint Venture
    Press Release The Power of Choice for Cargo Customers as Air France-KLM, Delta and Virgin Atlantic launch trans-Atlantic Joint Venture AMSTERDAM/PARIS, ATLANTA and LONDON: February 3rd, 2020 – Air France-KLM Cargo, Delta Air Lines Cargo and Virgin Atlantic Cargo are promising cargo customers more connections, greater shipment routing flexibility, improved trucking options, aligned services and innovative digital solutions with the launch of their expanded trans-Atlantic Joint Venture (JV). The new partnership, which represents 23% of total trans-Atlantic cargo capacity or more than 600,000 tonnes annually, will enable the airlines to offer the best-ever customer experience, and a combined network of up to 341 peak daily trans-Atlantic services – a choice of 110 nonstop routes with onward connections to 238 cities in North America, 98 in Continental Europe and 16 in the U.K. More choice and convenience for customers Customers will be able to leverage an enhanced network built around the airlines’ hubs in Amsterdam, Atlanta, Boston, Detroit, London Heathrow, Los Angeles, Minneapolis, New York-JFK, Paris, Seattle and Salt Lake City. It creates convenient nonstop or one-stop connections to every corner of North America, Europe and the U.K., giving customers the added confidence of delivery schedules being met by a wide choice of options. The expanded JV enables greater co-operation between the airlines, focused on delivering world class customer service and reliability on both sides of the Atlantic achieved through co-located facilities, joint trucking options as well as seamless bookings and connected service recovery. The airlines already co-locate at warehouses in key U.S., U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Presentation of the Traffic Results for 2020 and Outlook
    FLUGHAFEN WIEN AG Traffic Results 2020 and Business Outlook for 2021 Press Conference, 21 January 2021 2020: Most difficult year in the history of Vienna Airport – Upswing expected in 2021 Coronavirus pandemic comes close to bringing global flight operations to a standstill – passenger volumes down 60% across the globe (IATA estimate) 7.8 million passengers at Vienna Airport in 2020 (-75.3%) – like in the year 1994 The crisis has shown how indispensable air transport is: delivery of relief supplies, repatriation flights, Vienna Airport available 24/7 as part of the critical infrastructure Outlook for 2021: due to upturn in H2/2021 about 40% of pre-crisis level (12.5 million passengers) and expected consolidated net profit close to zero – short time work extended until March 2021 About 70% of pre-crisis level in 2022, approx. 80% in 2023 Vaccination will provide impetus to growth, but only with unified international and European travel regulations – digitalisation as a major opportunity (“digital vaccine certificate“) 2 Development in 2020 Traffic figures and influencing factors 3,500,000 PAX 2019 PAX 2020 14.4% 3,000,000 8.3% 2019 Deviation 2019/2020 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 1,000,000 -65.8% -74.7% -81.8% -81.1% -86.7% 500,000 -95.4% -93.4% -92.9% -99.5% -99.3% 2020 0 January February March April May June July August September October November December Begin of Travel warnings and 1st Insolvency First Passenger growth at restrictions on flight lockdown of Level Restart of “COVID- beginning of the year traffic Lauda Air Strongest Further tested “Lockdown End of Austrian Austrian and month travel flights“ light“, December: End of February: begin Repatriation flights, Airlines, Airlines Austrian thanks to warnings begin of beginning of first flight transport of relief Wizz Air resumes Airlines summer Antibody 2nd of 3rd cancellations (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Aer Lingus to Launch Service at Philadelphia International Airport
    For Immediate Release: October 4, 2017 Contact: Mary Flannery 215.937.5424 [email protected] Aer Lingus to Launch Service at Philadelphia International Airport PHILADELPHIA — Aer Lingus announced today it will begin non‐stop flights between Philadelphia International Airport (PHL) and Dublin (DUB) starting in March 2018. The Irish carrier will become the sixth foreign flag airline at PHL and the second to arrive in Philadelphia in the past year. Icelandair began service in May between PHL and Reykjavik. The Aer Lingus year‐round service will operate 4 times weekly on Monday, Wednesday, Friday and Sunday between Philadelphia, America’s first World Heritage City, and Dublin, the capital of the Republic of Ireland. “We are very pleased to welcome Aer Lingus to PHL and look forward to offering more non‐stop, year‐ round service to Dublin,” said Airport CEO Chellie Cameron. “This capital city is a gateway to the beautiful country of Ireland and to Europe. We are proud to expand our non‐stop international service and we are excited to enhance travel between Philadelphia and Ireland.” “We are delighted to announce Philadelphia as our new route for summer 2018,” said Aer Lingus Chief Operating Officer Mike Rutter. “We are proud to continue to deliver on our promise to grow our transatlantic network and further strengthen Dublin Airport as a leading gateway to North America, and we are looking forward to welcoming guests from Pennsylvania.” From Dublin, Aer Lingus passengers will have easy connections to 21 destinations in Europe and Abu Dhabi. The first Aer Lingus flight will arrive from Dublin on March 25, 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • Air Greenland Places Christmas Order for an A330neo
    Air Greenland places Christmas order for an A330neo #A330neo @AirGreenlandSAS Toulouse, 18 December 2020 – Air Greenland, the flag-carrier for Greenland, is the latest airline to order Airbus’ next generation A330neo widebody aircraft. The new A330-800 will replace the airline’s ageing Airbus A330-200ceo to secure operations linking the Arctic island with Denmark from end of 2022 onwards and beyond. Air Greenland’s CEO’s Jacob Nitter Sørensen said: “The A330neo is a fundamental part of Air Greenland’s fleet strategy. The new aircraft will, for years to come, offer travellers to and from Greenland a unique inflight experience while leaving the lowest carbon footprint possible. The A330neo is a perfect fit for the very challenging task of providing safe and efficient all year passenger, cargo and freight services to and from Greenland.” “We’re pleased to see Air Greenland renew its confidence in the A330 Family and join the growing number of operators who are selecting the A330neo as a logical replacement for their ageing fleets,” said Christian Scherer, Airbus Chief Commercial Officer. “To imagine the airline’s distinctive red livery set against the Arctic’s environment provides some Christmas cheer at the end of a year that has been harsh for our entire industry.” The Airbus A330neo is a true new-generation aircraft, building on features popular for the A330ceo and developed for the latest technology A350. Equipped with a compelling Airspace cabin, the A330neo offers a unique passenger experience with the latest- generation, in-flight entertainment systems and connectivity. Powered by the latest Rolls- Royce Trent 7000 engines, and featuring a new wing with increased span and A350-inspired ‘Sharklets’, the A330neo also provides an unprecedented level of efficiency – with 25% lower fuel-burn per seat than previous-generation competitors.
    [Show full text]
  • Case No COMP/JV.19 - */*** KLM / ALITALIA
    EN Case No COMP/JV.19 - */*** KLM / ALITALIA Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EEC) No 4064/89 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 6(1)(b) NON-OPPOSITION Date: 11/08/1999 Also available in the CELEX database Document No 399J0019 Office for Official Publications of the European Communities L-2985 Luxembourg COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 11.08.1999 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION In the published version of this decision, some information has been omitted pursuant to Article 17(2) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 concerning non-disclosure of business secrets and other confidential information. The omissions are shown thus […]. Where possible the information omitted has been replaced by ranges of figures or a general description. to the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject: Case M/JV-19 KLM-Alitalia Notification of 29 June 1999 pursuant to Article 4 of Regulation N°4064/89 1. On 29 June 1999, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC) No. 4064/891 as last amended by Regulation (EC) No. 1310/972 (the Merger Regulation) by which the undertakings Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij N.V. (KLM) and Alitalia Linee Aeree Italiane S.p.A. (Alitalia) will constitute a Joint Venture under the meaning of Article 3 (2) of the Merger Regulation. 2. In the course of the proceedings, the parties submitted undertakings designed to eliminate competition concerns identified by the Commission, in accordance with Article 6(2) of the Merger Regulation. After examination of the notification and in the light of these modifications, the Commission has concluded that the operation 1 OJ L 395, 30.12.1989, p.1; corrigendum OJ L 257, 21.9.1990, p.13 2 OJ L 180, 9.7.1997, p.1; corrigendum OJ L 40, 13.2.1998, p.17 Rue de la Loi 200, B-1049 Bruxelles/Wetstraat 200, B-1049 Brussel - Belgium Telephone: exchange 299.11.11.
    [Show full text]