Fluid Bulk Modulus: Comparison of Low Pressure Models

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fluid Bulk Modulus: Comparison of Low Pressure Models International Journal of Fluid Power 13 (2012) No. 1 pp. 7-16 FLUID BULK MODULUS: COMPARISON OF LOW PRESSURE MODELS Hossein Gholizadeh, Richard Burton and Greg Schoenau Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan 57 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 5A9 Contact: [email protected] ABSTRACT Fluid bulk modulus is a fluid property that has been studied extensively over the past. The numerical value of this property depends on the operating conditions, the amount of entrained air/gas, and the way compression is applied and to some extent, the mathematical form it is defined. In a companion paper, an extensive review of fluid bulk modulus was presented. From this review, it was established that many models for fluid bulk modulus in the low pressure range (below critical pressure) have been forwarded. However, many of these models are based on assumptions that have not been explicitly defined. This paper considers these models and attempts to quantify the underlying assumptions. In addition some modification to these models are proposed in order to compare their prediction in the case where air/gas in entrained, for example. The paper concludes by categorizing the models into two groups and recommending the best model that can be used for each group. Finally some problems which observed in the models are discussed and future work for solving these problems presented. Keywords: fluid bulk modulus models, hydraulic fluid, air/gas dissolving, adiabatic, isothermal, volumetric fraction of air/gas, critical pressure 1 Introduction Fluid bulk modulus represents the resistance of a were not consistent. The objective of this paper is to liquid to compression and is the reciprocal of com- provide a summary of these models and the condi- pressibility (Manring, 2005). Bulk modulus is a funda- tions/assumptions upon which these were based. In mental and inherent property of liquids which repre- addition, the authors present some modifications to sents the change in density of the liquid as external these models which would allow a comparison to be pressure is applied to the liquid. It shows both the stiff- made for the same operating conditions. The paper will ness of the system and the speed of transmission of conclude by discussing some of the results and will pressure waves. Therefore, stability of servo-hydraulic present some guidelines on how best to choose the systems and efficiency of hydraulic systems is affected most appropriate formulation for a particular applica- by the value of compressibility (Hayward, 1963). tion. There have been many studies and publications on the topic of fluid bulk modulus. It is clear that the nu- merical value of this property depends on the operating 2 Models of the Effective Fluid Bulk conditions, the amount of entrained air/gas present, the Modulus way compression is applied and to some extent, the mathematical formulation. In a companion paper In practical hydraulic systems, fluid is a mixture of (Gholizadeh et al., 2011) an extensive review of the the basic fluid, dissolved air/gas, air/gas bubbles and research that has been published on this subject was sometimes also vapor (Kajaste et al., 2005). In addition presented. Many of these studies produced mathemati- to the composition of the fluid, operating pressure and cal and in some cases, experimental models to define temperature as well as the mechanical compliance of the operating behavior of fluid bulk modulus as a func- hydraulic components can affect the fluid bulk tion of pressure and temperature. It was evident from modulus. To account for the effects of these variables, these models that for similar conditions, the predictions different models have been proposed by different re- This manuscript was received on 16 June 2011 and was accepted searchers. Please note that in all of these models, the after revision for publication on 8 November 2011 term “fluid” means the homogeneous mixture of the © 2012 TuTech 7 Hossein Gholizadeh, Richard Burton and Greg Schoenau liquid and air/gas. For the air/gas free fluid, the term An examination of Merrit’s equation shows that in liquid will be used. this model, the volumetric fraction of the entrained It was observed that different authors used different air/gas in the oil is always considered to be equal to the definitions for the volumetric fraction of the air/gas at volumetric fraction of the entrained air/gas at atmos- atmospheric pressure, which sometimes causes confu- pheric pressure and the effect of increasing pressure on sion and makes the comparison of the models difficult. the volumetric fraction of the entrained air/gas has not Therefore, adopting one of these definitions as the been considered. Since this has not been taken into “standard” definition was deemed necessary. In the account in this model, the effective bulk modulus value next section where appropriate, the volumetric fraction predicted in Merritt’s model will be lower than the of the entrained air/gas at atmospheric pressure used in actual effective bulk modulus. This also shows that various models will be changed to this standard defini- using the secant bulk modulus definition to find the tion. Thus, the following standard definition for the effective bulk modulus leads to the lower effective bulk “volumetric fraction of entrained air/gas at atmospheric modulus values. pressure (P0) and temperature 273°K” is adopted Nykanen et al. (2000) derived a two-phase model for V an air/gas-liquid mixture. In this model, the effect of g0 X 0 = (1) dissolving entrained air/gas has not been considered. The VVg + l 00 bulk modulus definition used to develop his model was Assume that unit volume of fluid is taken; therefore ⎛⎞∂P Ke0= ρ ⎜⎟ (6) VV+=1 ∂ρ gl00 ⎝⎠ XV= 0 g0 (2) This definition is not consistent with the standard 1−=X V definition of tangent bulk modulus in which ρ should 0 l0 be considered instead of considering ρ0. Moreover, in For each of the models introduced, the definition of order to find Vl based on the liquid bulk modulus, this parameter used by the various authors will be high- Nykanen et al. (2000) used the secant bulk modulus, lighted, and then where appropriate all of the models that is will be modified to follow this standard definition. It PP− 0 should be also noted that in those models which the KVll=− (7) VVll− effect of temperature on the volume of the entrained 0 air/gas has been neglected, the X0 and other parameters This definition is again in contrast with the gener- with the zero subscript, simply represent the value of ally accepted secant bulk modulus definition which that parameter at atmospheric pressure. uses initial volume of fluid in the numerator. His final Merritt (1967) defined the “effective bulk modulus” equation for bulk modulus was presented to be model for a liquid-gas mixture in a flexible container. ⎛⎞2 In his analysis, the following assumptions were made: ⎜⎟1 ⎛⎞PXn 1− secant bulk modulus was used to develop the model; ⎜⎟00X + gas bubbles were assumed to be uniformly distributed ⎜⎟P 0 PP− ⎜⎟⎝⎠ 1+ 0 throughout the liquid; solubility of the air/gas in the ⎜⎟ ⎝⎠K l K = liquid was not considered, air/gas was treated as a per- Nykanen 1 (8) fect gas, surface tension effects were neglected and the ⎛⎞P n 0 X liquid and gas assumed to have the same pressure and ⎜⎟P 0 1− X ⎝⎠ + 0 temperature. 2 nP ⎛⎞PP− Using these assumptions the effective bulk modulus 0 ⎜⎟1+ K l was defined as ⎝⎠K l 111Vg ⎛⎞ 11 Before comparing the models, it is important to =++0 ⎜⎟ − (3) K KKVKK⎜⎟ mention that from this point forward; all of the models ecl0 ⎝⎠ gl will be compared based on the same assumed condi- In Eq. 3, K represents the secant bulk modulus of tions of: P0 = 0.1 MPa, Kl = 1500 MPa, n = 1 (isother- g mal condition) and X = 0.1. the gas, however; instead of replacing the secant bulk 0 These conditions were arbitrary chosen just for modulus formula in Eq. 3, Merritt has replaced it with comparison purposes. But for practical conditions, the the tangent bulk modulus formula for the gas, which is real value of these parameters needs to be determined. K = nP g (4) Since for very small values of X0, the difference be- tween the models was small, therefore, a larger value Assuming a rigid container; this model can be writ- was chosen for X in order to clearly show the differ- ten as 0 ences between the models. It should be noted that none K l of the following models consider the effect of tempera- K = (5) Merrit ⎛⎞K ture on the liquid bulk modulus (which is critical). 11+−X l 0 ⎜⎟ Since the models were compared in the low pressure ⎝⎠nP range (0 - 5 Mpa), the effect of pressure on the liquid It should be noted that this model is the same as the bulk modulus was neglected and the constant value for model proposed by Wylie (1983). the liquid bulk modulus was assumed. 8 International Journal of Fluid Power 13 (2012) No. 1 pp. 7-16 Fluid Bulk Modulus: Comparison of Low Pressure Models ⎛⎞1 ⎛⎞P n ⎜⎟0 ⎜⎟XX00+−(1 ) ⎜⎟⎝⎠P ⎝⎠ K = modified Nykanen 1 (13) XP⎛⎞n (1− X ) 00⎜⎟+ 0 nP⎝⎠ P Kl Cho et al. (2000) defined the effective bulk modulus model for a liquid-gas mixture in a rigid container. The assumptions are the same as the Merritt’s model except that in this model, the definition of tangent bulk modulus has been used. The instantaneous total volume has been defined as the sum of the instantaneous vol- ume of air/gas and liquid.
Recommended publications
  • Lecture 13: Earth Materials
    Earth Materials Lecture 13 Earth Materials GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Hooke’s law of elasticity Force Extension = E × Area Length Hooke’s law σn = E εn where E is material constant, the Young’s Modulus Units are force/area – N/m2 or Pa Robert Hooke (1635-1703) was a virtuoso scientist contributing to geology, σ = C ε palaeontology, biology as well as mechanics ij ijkl kl ß Constitutive equations These are relationships between forces and deformation in a continuum, which define the material behaviour. GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Shear modulus and bulk modulus Young’s or stiffness modulus: σ n = Eε n Shear or rigidity modulus: σ S = Gε S = µε s Bulk modulus (1/compressibility): Mt Shasta andesite − P = Kεv Can write the bulk modulus in terms of the Lamé parameters λ, µ: K = λ + 2µ/3 and write Hooke’s law as: σ = (λ +2µ) ε GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Young’s Modulus or stiffness modulus Young’s Modulus or stiffness modulus: σ n = Eε n Interatomic force Interatomic distance GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Shear Modulus or rigidity modulus Shear modulus or stiffness modulus: σ s = Gε s Interatomic force Interatomic distance GNH7/GG09/GEOL4002 EARTHQUAKE SEISMOLOGY AND EARTHQUAKE HAZARD Hooke’s Law σij and εkl are second-rank tensors so Cijkl is a fourth-rank tensor. For a general, anisotropic material there are 21 independent elastic moduli. In the isotropic case this tensor reduces to just two independent elastic constants, λ and µ.
    [Show full text]
  • Efficient Hydraulic Fluids Compressibility Is Still One of the Most Critically Important Factors
    WORLDWIDE R. David Whitby Efficient hydraulic fluids Compressibility is still one of the most critically important factors. ydraulic fluids transmit power as a hydraulic system con- while phosphate and vegetable-oil esters have compressibilities H verts mechanical energy into fluid energy and subsequently similar to that of water. Polyalphaolefins are more compressible to mechanical work. To achieve this conversion efficiently, hydrau- than mineral oils. Water-glycol fluids are intermediate between lic fluids need to be relatively incompressible. Hydraulic fluids mineral oils and water. must also minimize wear, reduce friction, provide cooling and pre- Mineral oils are relatively incompressible, but volume reduc- vent rust and corrosion, be compatible with system components tions can be approximately 0.5% for pressures ranging from 6,900 and help keep the system free of deposits. kPa (1,000 psi) up to 27,600 kPa (4,000 psi). Compressibility in- Compressibility measures the rela- creases with pressure and temperature tive change in volume of a fluid or solid and has significant effects on high-pres- as a response to a change in pressure and sure fluid systems. Hydraulic oils typi- is the reciprocal of the volume-elastic cally contain 6% to 10% of dissolved air, modulus or bulk modulus of elasticity. which has no measurable effect on bulk Bulk modulus defines the pressure in- modulus provided it stays in solution. crease needed to cause a given relative Bulk modulus is an inherent property decrease in volume. of the hydraulic fluid and, therefore, is The bulk modulus of a fluid is nonlin- an inherent inefficiency of the hydraulic ear.
    [Show full text]
  • Velocity, Density, Modulus of Hydrocarbon Fluids
    Velocity, Density and Modulus of Hydrocarbon Fluids --Data Measurement De-hua Han*, HARC; M. Batzle, CSM Summary measured with pressure up to 55.2 Mpa (8000 Psi) and temperature up to 100 °C. Density and ultrasonic velocity of numerous hydrocarbon fluids (oil, oil based mud filtrate, hydrocarbon gases and Velocity of Dead Oil miscible CO2-oil) were measured at in situ conditions of pressure up to 50 Mpa and temperatures up to100 °C. Initial measurements were on the gas-free or ‘dead’ oils at Dynamic moduli are derived from velocities and densities. pressure and temperature (see Fig. 1). We used the Newly measured data refine correlations of velocity and following model to fit data: density to API gravity, Gas Oil ratio (GOR), Gas gravity and in situ pressure and temperature. Gas in solution is Vp (m/s) = A – B * T + C * P + D * T * P (1) largely responsible for reducing the bulk modulus of the live oil. Phase changes, such as exsolving gas during Here A is a pseudo velocity at 0 °C and room pressure (0 production, can dramatically lower velocities and modulus, Mpa, gauge), B is temperature gradient, C is pressure but is dependent on pressure conditions. Distinguish gas gradient and D is coefficient of coupled temperature and from liquid phase may not be possible at a high pressure. pressure effects. Fluids are often supercritical. With increasing pressure, a gas-like fluid can begin to behave like a liquid Dead & live oil of #1 B.P. = 1900 psi at 60 C Introduction 1800 1600 Hydrocarbon fluids are the primary targets of the seismic exploration.
    [Show full text]
  • FORMULAS for CALCULATING the SPEED of SOUND Revision G
    FORMULAS FOR CALCULATING THE SPEED OF SOUND Revision G By Tom Irvine Email: [email protected] July 13, 2000 Introduction A sound wave is a longitudinal wave, which alternately pushes and pulls the material through which it propagates. The amplitude disturbance is thus parallel to the direction of propagation. Sound waves can propagate through the air, water, Earth, wood, metal rods, stretched strings, and any other physical substance. The purpose of this tutorial is to give formulas for calculating the speed of sound. Separate formulas are derived for a gas, liquid, and solid. General Formula for Fluids and Gases The speed of sound c is given by B c = (1) r o where B is the adiabatic bulk modulus, ro is the equilibrium mass density. Equation (1) is taken from equation (5.13) in Reference 1. The characteristics of the substance determine the appropriate formula for the bulk modulus. Gas or Fluid The bulk modulus is essentially a measure of stress divided by strain. The adiabatic bulk modulus B is defined in terms of hydrostatic pressure P and volume V as DP B = (2) - DV / V Equation (2) is taken from Table 2.1 in Reference 2. 1 An adiabatic process is one in which no energy transfer as heat occurs across the boundaries of the system. An alternate adiabatic bulk modulus equation is given in equation (5.5) in Reference 1. æ ¶P ö B = ro ç ÷ (3) è ¶r ø r o Note that æ ¶P ö P ç ÷ = g (4) è ¶r ø r where g is the ratio of specific heats.
    [Show full text]
  • Adiabatic Bulk Moduli
    8.03 at ESG Supplemental Notes Adiabatic Bulk Moduli To find the speed of sound in a gas, or any property of a gas involving elasticity (see the discussion of the Helmholtz oscillator, B&B page 22, or B&B problem 1.6, or French Pages 57-59.), we need the “bulk modulus” of the fluid. This will correspond to the “spring constant” of a spring, and will give the magnitude of the restoring agency (pressure for a gas, force for a spring) in terms of the change in physical dimension (volume for a gas, length for a spring). It turns out to be more useful to use an intensive quantity for the bulk modulus of a gas, so what we want is the change in pressure per fractional change in volume, so the bulk modulus, denoted as κ (the Greek “kappa” which, when written, has a great tendency to look like k, and in fact French uses “K”), is ∆p dp κ = − , or κ = −V . ∆V/V dV The minus sign indicates that for normal fluids (not all are!), a negative change in volume results in an increase in pressure. To find the bulk modulus, we need to know something about the gas and how it behaves. For our purposes, we will need three basic principles (actually 2 1/2) which we get from thermodynamics, or the kinetic theory of gasses. You might well have encountered these in previous classes, such as chemistry. A) The ideal gas law; pV = nRT , with the standard terminology. B) The first law of thermodynamics; dU = dQ − pdV,whereUis internal energy and Q is heat.
    [Show full text]
  • Course: US01CPHY01 UNIT – 1 ELASTICITY – I Introduction
    Course: US01CPHY01 UNIT – 1 ELASTICITY – I Introduction: If the distance between any two points in a body remains invariable, the body is said to be a rigid body. In practice it is not possible to have a perfectly rigid body. The deformations are (i) There may be change in length (ii) There is a change of volume but no change in shape (iii) There is a change in shape with no change in volume All bodies get deformed under the action of force. The size and shape of the body will change on application of force. There is a tendency of body to recover its original size and shape on removal of this force. Elasticity: The property of a material body to regain its original condition on the removal of deforming forces, is called elasticity. Quartz fibre is considered to be the perfectly elastic body. Plasticity: The bodies which do not show any tendency to recover their original condition on the removal of deforming forces are called plasticity. Putty is considered to be the perfectly plastic body. Load: The load is the combination of external forces acting on a body and its effect is to change the form or the dimensions of the body. Any kind of deforming force is known as Load. When a body is subjected to a force or a system of forces it undergoes a change in size or shape or both. Elastic bodies offer appreciable resistance to the deforming forces. As a result, work has to be done to deform them. This amount of work is stored in body as elastic potential energy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mechanical Properties and Elastic Anisotropies of Cubic Ni3al from First Principles Calculations
    crystals Article The Mechanical Properties and Elastic Anisotropies of Cubic Ni3Al from First Principles Calculations Xinghe Luan 1,2, Hongbo Qin 1,2,* ID , Fengmei Liu 1,*, Zongbei Dai 1, Yaoyong Yi 1 and Qi Li 1 1 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Advanced Welding Technology, Guangdong Welding Institute (China-Ukraine E.O. Paton Institute of Welding), Guangzhou 541630, China; [email protected] (X.L.); [email protected] (Z.D.); [email protected] (Y.Y.); [email protected] (Q.L.) 2 Key Laboratory of Guangxi Manufacturing System and Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (H.Q.); [email protected] (F.L.) Received: 21 June 2018; Accepted: 22 July 2018; Published: 25 July 2018 Abstract: Ni3Al-based superalloys have excellent mechanical properties which have been widely used in civilian and military fields. In this study, the mechanical properties of the face-centred cubic structure Ni3Al were investigated by a first principles study based on density functional theory (DFT), and the generalized gradient approximation (GGA) was used as the exchange-correlation function. The bulk modulus, Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio of Ni3Al polycrystal were calculated by Voigt-Reuss approximation method, which are in good agreement with the existing experimental values. Moreover, directional dependences of bulk modulus, Young’s modulus, shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio of Ni3Al single crystal were explored. In addition, the thermodynamic properties (e.g., Debye temperature) of Ni3Al were investigated based on the calculated elastic constants, indicating an improved accuracy in this study, verified with a small deviation from the previous experimental value.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Pore Fluid Properties at High Pressure and Temperature On
    Effects of pore fluid properties at high pressure and temperature on seismic response Joel Walls*, Rock Solid Images and Jack Dvorkin, Rock Solid Images and Stanford University Summary means that 50 MPa occurs at approximately 5 km TVD. In overpressured formations, the pressure may be higher even We use software from the National Institute of at shallower depths. Also, tremendous amounts of Standards and Testing (NIST) to assess the adiabatic bulk domestic natural gas (55 Tcf offshore, according to MMS, modulus and density of natural gas and brine at pressures o and 135 Tcf onshore, according to USGS) may be available up to 200 MPa and temperatures up to 200 C. The at depths below 15,000 ft (about 5 km TVD) and as deep as calculations are based on equations of state which are 25,000 ft (about 7.5 km). This promising domestic gas calibrated and verified by many experimental potential calls for improvements in the interpretation of measurements. The results indicate that as pressure very deep seismic events and, as part of this technical task, increases from the normal range of 20 to 50 MPa to the valid estimates for the bulk modulus and density of the pore very high range of 150 to 200 MPa, the bulk modulus of fluid, especially gas, in deep reservoirs at very high methane may increase tenfold, from about 0.1 to about 1.0 pressure. GPa. The latter values are comparable to those for oil. For heavier hydrocarbon gases (ethane, propane, butane, and Comparison to Batzle-Wang (1992) their mixtures) the modulus will be even higher.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics 140 Sound
    Physics 140 Sound Chapter 12 Sound waves Sound is composed of longitudinal pressure waves. wave propagaon Compression è when Compression Compression parBcles come together RarefacBon RarefacBon RarefacBon è when parBcles are farthest apart 2 Physics 140, Prof. M. Nikolic Sound waves Described by the gauge pressure – difference between the pressure at a given point and average pressure 3 Physics 140, Prof. M. Nikolic The speed of sound waves T Let’s remember Chapter 11 and the speed of string waves v = µ The speed of sound B waves v = B is the bulk modulus of the medium ρ and ρ its density. The speed of sound Y v = waves in thin rods Y is the Young’s modulus of the ρ medium and ρ its density. All other equaons from Chapter 11 sBll apply. 2π v = f λ k = 4 Physics 140, Prof. M. Nikolic λ Conceptual quesBon – Speed of sound Q1 Given the informaon in the table below, which substance would have the highest speed of sound? Substance Bulk Modulus Density Speed (GPa) (kg/m3) (m/s) Aluminum 70 2700 Brass 61 8400 Copper 14 8900 Mercury 27 13600 A. aluminum B B. brass v = C. copper ρ D. mercury 5 Physics 140, Prof. M. Nikolic Conceptual quesBon – Speed of sound Q1 Given the informaon in the table below, which substance would have the highest speed of sound? Substance Bulk Modulus Density Speed (GPa) (kg/m3) (m/s) Aluminum 70 2700 5.1 x 103 Brass 61 8400 2.7 x 103 Copper 14 8900 1.25 x 103 Mercury 27 13600 1.4 x 103 A.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 13 FLUIDS • Density ! Bulk Modulus ! Compressibility
    Liquids CHAPTER 13 FLUIDS FLUIDS Gases • Density To begin with ... some important definitions ... ! Bulk modulus ! Compressibility Mass m DENSITY: , i.e., ρ = • Pressure in a fluid Volume V ! Hydraulic lift [M] ! Hydrostatic paradox Dimension: ⇒ 3 [ L] • Measurement of pressure −3 Units: ⇒ kg ⋅ m ! Manometers and barometers • Buoyancy and Archimedes Principle ! Upthrust Force F ! Apparent weight PRESSURE: , i.e., P = Area A • Fluids in motion [M] ! Continuity Dimension: ⇒ [L][T]2 ! Bernoulli’s equation Units: ⇒ N ⋅ m−2 ⇒ Pascals (Pa) Mass = Volume × Density Question 13.1: What, approximately, is the mass of air Volume of room ≈ 15 m ×10 m × 3 m −3 in this room if the density of air is 1 .29 kg ⋅ m ? 3 −3 ∴ M ≈ 450 m ×1.29kg ⋅ m = 580 kg (over half-a-ton!) The weight of a medium apple is ~ 1 N, so the mass of a medium apple is ~ 0.1 kg. 3 A typical refrigerator has a capacity of ~ 18 ft . 3 3 3 ∴ 18 ft ⇒ 18 × (0.305 m) = 0.51 m . 3 But 1 m of air has a mass of 1 .3 kg, so the mass of air in the refrigerator is Question 13.2: How does the mass of a medium sized 0 .51×1.3 kg = 0.66 kg, apples compare with the mass of air in a typical i.e., approximately the mass of 6 apples! 3 refrigerator? the density of cold air is ~ 1.3 kg/m . We don’t notice the weight of air because we are immersed in air ... you wouldn’t notice the weight of a bag of water if it was handed to you underwater would you? definitions (continued) ..
    [Show full text]
  • [Physics.Class-Ph] 9 May 2020 the Incremental Bulk Modulus, Young's
    Mathematics and Mechanics of Solids (2007) 12, 526–542. doi: 10.1177/1081286506064719 Published 7 April 2006 Page 1 of 16 The incremental bulk modulus, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio in nonlinear isotropic elasticity: physically reasonable response N.H. Scott∗ School of Mathematics, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K. 12 May 2020 [Dedicated to Michael Hayes with esteem and gratitude] Abstract An incremental (or tangent) bulk modulus for finite isotropic elasticity is de- fined which compares an increment in hydrostatic pressure with the corresponding increment in relative volume. Its positivity provides a stringent criterion for phys- ically reasonable response involving the second derivatives of the strain energy function. Also, an average (or secant) bulk modulus is defined by comparing the current stress with the relative volume change. The positivity of this bulk modulus provides a physically reasonable response criterion less stringent than the former. The concept of incremental bulk modulus is extended to anisotropic elasticity. For states of uniaxial tension an incremental Poisson’s ratio and an incremental Young’s modulus are similarly defined for nonlinear isotropic elasticity and have properties similar to those of the incremental bulk modulus. The incremental Pois- son’s ratios for the isotropic constraints of incompressibility, Bell, Ericksen, and constant area are considered. The incremental moduli are all evaluated for a spe- cific example of the compressible neo-Hookean solid. Bounds on the ground state Lam´eelastic moduli, assumed positive, are given which are sufficient to guarantee the positivity of the incremental bulk and Young’s moduli for all strains.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 3 Constitutive Equations
    Module 3 Constitutive Equations Learning Objectives • Understand basic stress-strain response of engineering materials. • Quantify the linear elastic stress-strain response in terms of tensorial quantities and in particular the fourth-order elasticity or stiffness tensor describing Hooke's Law. • Understand the relation between internal material symmetries and macroscopic anisotropy, as well as the implications on the structure of the stiffness tensor. • Quantify the response of anisotropic materials to loadings aligned as well as rotated with respect to the material principal axes with emphasis on orthotropic and transversely- isotropic materials. • Understand the nature of temperature effects as a source of thermal expansion strains. • Quantify the linear elastic stress and strain tensors from experimental strain-gauge measurements. • Quantify the linear elastic stress and strain tensors resulting from special material loading conditions. 3.1 Linear elasticity and Hooke's Law Readings: Reddy 3.4.1 3.4.2 BC 2.6 Consider the stress strain curve σ = f() of a linear elastic material subjected to uni-axial stress loading conditions (Figure 3.1). 45 46 MODULE 3. CONSTITUTIVE EQUATIONS σ ˆ 1 2 ψ = 2 Eǫ E 1 ǫ Figure 3.1: Stress-strain curve for a linear elastic material subject to uni-axial stress σ (Note that this is not uni-axial strain due to Poisson effect) In this expression, E is Young's modulus. Strain Energy Density For a given value of the strain , the strain energy density (per unit volume) = ^(), is defined as the area under the curve. In this case, 1 () = E2 2 We note, that according to this definition, @ ^ σ = = E @ In general, for (possibly non-linear) elastic materials: @ ^ σij = σij() = (3.1) @ij Generalized Hooke's Law Defines the most general linear relation among all the components of the stress and strain tensor σij = Cijklkl (3.2) In this expression: Cijkl are the components of the fourth-order stiffness tensor of material properties or Elastic moduli.
    [Show full text]