DOCSLIB.ORG

Download-The-Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download-The-Report Evaluating the Basis for Equating Atheism with Immorality Katherine Hughes, Philosophy Department 6 April 2020 Thesis Advisor: Professor Garret Bredeson, Department of Philosophy Committee Members: Professor Iskra Fileva, Department of Philosophy Professor Rachael Deagman Simonetta, Department of English Hughes 2 Abstract: Evaluating the Basis for Equating Atheism with Immorality On numerous occasions I have come across people who genuinely believe that it is impossible for an atheist to act virtuously or even have any morals at all. I wanted to explore whether this was a common viewpoint in the United States and whether there was any philosophical basis for such a belief. I begin with an examination of prejudice against atheists in the United States and the stereotype of atheists as immoral. I then consider various philosophical theories that contemplate whether religion is a necessity in the conception of and adherence to a system of morality. I appraise more strict renditions such as the Divine Command Theory as well as more complex interpretations like those of Immanuel Kant in Critique of Practical Reason and the Third Earl of Shaftesbury in An Inquiry Concerning Virtue or Merit. I found that there appears to be a greater general agreement today that there exists a standard of right and wrong independent of the word of God. Furthermore, it is entirely possible through different conceptions of the nature of humanity and happiness to act virtuously without religion. Hughes 3 Evaluating the Basis for Equating Atheism with Immorality by Katherine Hughes Religion and morality have long been linked in conversation across the ages. However, given the increasing role of secularism and atheism in modern society, it is surprising that there remains a widespread belief that one must believe in God to be a moral or virtuous person. To this day, atheists, although a growing minority in our population, continue to be stereotyped as immoral. So, is it true that God, or a god, is necessary for one to have, know, or act morally? Where exactly lies the divide, if any, between religion and virtue? Throughout the ages, atheists have been viewed as immoral, and even criminal. Even being perceived as an atheist or secular intellectual could be dangerous. This is likely one reason why a lot of early philosophers tried to find a link between religion and morality no matter how small. However, even their attempts to illustrate a more underlying necessity of religion in order for someone to consistently act morally were inadequate in creating a necessitating link between these two separate domains of life. Atheism is often simply defined as a lack of belief in gods (Zindler, Frank). Only relatively recently have Americans been willing to identify publicly as atheists. Their numbers were miniscule and speaking out against the majority’s spiritual views resulted in doubt about the atheist’s morality. Skeptics towards certain religious sects grew in over the centuries but a full-fledged atheist, admitting to their lack of belief in a Supreme Being, was practically unheard of until the late nineteenth century. Even then, those who self-identified as atheists often had to deal with harsh stereotypes that led to them being ostracized, persecuted and discriminated against. Therefore, when freedom of religion was written into the United States Constitution, the nonreligious were not even considered a religious sect in need of protection from persecution. Hughes 4 Despite the increasing numbers of the non-religious in our society, to this day the non-religious are not treated as entitled to the right to freedom of religion. Indeed, some of our laws, procedures, and practices of public life still incorporate a belief in religion and God. There are still countries today where atheists or those who switch religions are subject to capital punishment for their lack of adherence to the national religion. According to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, all human beings should be treated equally and have freedom of expression, thought and religion. However, the 2019 annual “The Freedom of Thought Report” conducted by Humanists International has found that there is still a devastating majority of United Nations’ member states that either discriminate against non-religious citizens or even go so far as to jail their citizens for acts that are regarded as “blasphemous”. Even the United States, who in this report ranks 32nd in protecting freedom of thought and yet is generally perceived around the globe as committed to the protection of freedom of religion and expression, continues to have systemic discrimination against the non-religious in both general society and government at all levels. Theoretically and legally, the nonreligious should be protected against persecution and given all the same rights and freedoms as all other citizens. Yet when Americans are asked whether they would vote for an atheist president, the answer has always been a loud and resounding “no”. Why are the secular still written off by our society, regarded as unable to give truthful testimony and excluded from numerous activities purely on the basis that they lack the belief in a higher being? These practices and legal prejudices show that many people tend to equate being American with being religious. Why is there such a distinction? It is likely due to the common stereotype that underlies a lot of the discrimination against and persecution of secular citizens to this day -- that all atheists are immoral and un-American. Hughes 5 Despite the fact that now only half the world’s population is religious, and the population of atheists and non-religious has grown to thirty-six percent, atheists largely remain at worst endlessly persecuted and at best completely ignored in their protests for religious freedom (Humanists International). Since the twentieth century, many scholars and activists who gained prominence for their generous humanitarian, political, or other notable works and then later announced publicly their lack of belief in religion, have either been outcast, like Elizabeth Cady Stanton, or their religious views intentionally excluded from history books such as Jane Addams who founded the Hull House (Moore, R. Laurence, and Isaac Kramnick). This blatant disregard towards atheists has persisted throughout history and the complete lack of mention of the nonreligious or atheists in history textbooks today, is just one example where this can be seen. Exclusion of the non-religious continues to be an ongoing reality in politics and in everyday lives. The ostracization of atheists is likely a result of their minority number within the United States. According to a recent research survey conducted by the Pew Research Center in December of 2017, only one in ten Americans said they didn’t believe in God or a higher power (Fahmy, Dalia). Though this growing minority class experiences less lawful discrimination today, atheists are still a publicly persecuted minority due to the still festering stigma from the Red Scare Era. Even young boys and girls face this ongoing war against atheists. Recently, the Boy Scouts of America opened its doors to all religions, races, and, as of 2019, all genders. But it is still holding firm to its prohibition of atheist members. The association’s refusal to accept the nonreligious is partly attributed to their adherence to their long-standing Scout Promise that mentions a “duty to God” (Mehta, Hemant). Those words, “duty to God,” instilled in the Boy Scouts of America Oath and Law, as well as the inclusion of the words, “under God” in the U.S. Pledge of Allegiance, only serve to perpetuate the negative public opinion of atheists that Hughes 6 skyrocketed after the Red Scare. This refusal to relinquish the use of God in social and political mandates continues the ostracization of the nonreligious American demographic. Most judges and other public figures have cited these words as representing the American ideal, yet God is notably and entirely absent from the United States Constitution. Moreover, the mention of God in American societal settings is contrary to the First Amendment’s establishment of the right to freedom of religion. However, many people still believe that atheists cannot be considered true Americans (Farah, Joseph). This line of thought results in barriers to the nonreligious’ complete inclusion in American society, such as being elected to public office. To this day, many people won’t vote for a well-qualified candidate for any political office if the candidate is a professed atheist. Though separation of church and state is a founding principle of our country, people often consider a candidate’s religious views when casting a vote. In a survey done by the Pew Research Center in 2016, U.S. adults were asked whether they would be more or less likely to support a particular candidate based on certain traits. The results found that atheism is perceived as one of the biggest shortcomings when it comes to a presidential candidate [see Figure 1 below]. The disbelief in God was seen as a greater liability to potential presidential candidates than even a candidate with previous financial troubles or a Muslim candidate, which is a religious class that has been viewed in a highly negative light in the United States for the last eighteen years (Mitchell, Travis). Even in Congress the lack of nonreligious members is striking. According to another Pew Research Center survey, the religiously unaffiliated were the most severely underrepresented in Congress (Sandstrom, Aleksandra). Furthermore, eight state constitutions in the United States still prohibit atheists from holding public office (Moore, R. Laurence, and Isaac Kramnick). Though these constitutional mandates are unenforceable due to their conflict with the First Amendment, their Hughes 7 continued inclusion in these state constitutions serve to perpetuate the political and social stigma of atheists as untrustworthy and un-American.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Life with Augustine
    Life with Augustine ...a course in his spirit and guidance for daily living By Edmond A. Maher ii Life with Augustine © 2002 Augustinian Press Australia Sydney, Australia. Acknowledgements: The author wishes to acknowledge and thank the following people: ► the Augustinian Province of Our Mother of Good Counsel, Australia, for support- ing this project, with special mention of Pat Fahey osa, Kevin Burman osa, Pat Codd osa and Peter Jones osa ► Laurence Mooney osa for assistance in editing ► Michael Morahan osa for formatting this 2nd Edition ► John Coles, Peter Gagan, Dr. Frank McGrath fms (Brisbane CEO), Benet Fonck ofm, Peter Keogh sfo for sharing their vast experience in adult education ► John Rotelle osa, for granting us permission to use his English translation of Tarcisius van Bavel’s work Augustine (full bibliography within) and for his scholarly advice Megan Atkins for her formatting suggestions in the 1st Edition, that have carried over into this the 2nd ► those generous people who have completed the 1st Edition and suggested valuable improvements, especially Kath Neehouse and friends at Villanova College, Brisbane Foreword 1 Dear Participant Saint Augustine of Hippo is a figure in our history who has appealed to the curiosity and imagination of many generations. He is well known for being both sinner and saint, for being a bishop yet also a fellow pilgrim on the journey to God. One of the most popular and attractive persons across many centuries, his influence on the church has continued to our current day. He is also renowned for his influ- ence in philosophy and psychology and even (in an indirect way) art, music and architecture.
    [Show full text]
  • Critique of Plato's Conception of Morality with Reference to the Teachers' Expected Examination Integrity in Kenya
    A CRITIQUE OF PLATO’S CONCEPTION OF MORALITY WITH REFERENCE TO THE TEACHERS’ EXPECTED EXAMINATION INTEGRITY IN KENYA EDWARD MAINA ANDAFU A THESIS SUBMITTED IN FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN PHILOSOPHY OF EDUCATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF NAIROBI 2019 DECLARATION This thesis is my original work and it has not been presented for any award of a Degree or Diploma in any other University. ……………………………… ……………………… Edward Maina Andafu Date REG. No. E84/52028/2017 This thesis has been submitted for examination with our approval as the University Supervisors. Signature………………….. Date ……………………. Dr Atieno Kili K’Odhiambo Senior Lecturer in Philosophy of Education Department of Educational Foundations University of Nairobi Signature…………………… Date ……………………. Professor Samson Okuro Gunga Professor of Philosophy of Education Department of Educational Foundations University of Nairobi II DEDICATION This work is dedicated to all the members of my immediate family: my wife Dorcus Ofuyo, my sons, Lewis Andafu and Wesley Andafu, for their everlasting love; also to my late father Julius Andafu, and my late mother Ketry Andafu, who always had confidence in me. III ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I hereby acknowledge the following for their immense contribution to my work. My first thanks go to my very able supervisors, Dr Atieno Kili K’Odhiambo and Professor Samson Okuro Gunga who have mentored me through this work. I thank members of the Department of Educational Foundations, University of Nairobi whose positive criticism put me on the right track in pursuit of my studies. I am grateful to Dr Wycliffe Amukowa (Machakos University) for his moral and intellectual support towards the accomplishment of this work.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2014 Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy Bradley Taylor University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Taylor, Bradley, "Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy" (2014). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1468. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1468 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1468 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Human Beings and the Moral Law: Moral Precariousness in Kant's Ethical Philosophy Abstract ABSTRACT HUMAN BEINGS AND THE MORAL LAW: MORAL PRECARIOUSNESS IN KANT'S ETHICAL PHILOSOPHY Bradley M. Taylor Dr. Paul Guyer This dissertation is an examination of human moral precariousness in Kant's ethics. Human beings are in a state of moral precariousness insofar as they are ever-capable of transgressing the moral law and are often uncertain of the moral worth of their actions. Put another way, in this dissertation I argue that the basic relationship between human beings and the moral law, in Kant's moral philosophy, is, most fundamentally, one of tenuousness and vacillation. This relation is the fundamental characteristic of the human moral condition because such a relation is built into Kant's account of human moral agency. We have a tenuous relation to the moral law because we always have at least the possibility of conflict between our desire for happiness (i.e. the satisfaction of our inclinations) and the requirements of the moral law.
    [Show full text]
  • Love As a Moral Emotion* J. David Velleman
    Love as a Moral Emotion* J. David Velleman INTRODUCTION Love and morality are generally assumed to differ in spirit. The moral point of view is impartial and favors no particular individual, whereas favoring someone in particular seems like the very essence of love. Love and morality are therefore thought to place con¯icting demands on our attention, requiring us to look at things differently, whether or not they ultimately require us to do different things.1 The question is supposed to be whether a person can do justice to both perspectives. Some philosophers think that one or the other per- * The theme of this article was suggested to me by Harry Frankfurt's ``Autonomy, Necessity, and Love'' (in Vernunftbegriffe in der Moderne, ed. Hans Friedrich Fulda and Rolf- Peter Horstmann [Klett-Cotta, 1994], pp. 433± 47). I ®rst attempted to state the theme in a paper entitled ``Frankfurt on Love and Duty,'' written for a conference organized by RuÈdi- ger Bittner in the spring of 1996, at the Zentrum fuÈr interdiziplinaÈre Forschung, in Biele- feld, Germany. Some of that paper is reproduced here. Also contained here is material from a commentary on Henry S. Richardson's Practical Reasoning about Final Ends (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994); my commentary was presented at a session of the So- ciety for Informal Logic at the 1995 meetings of the American Philosophical Association (APA) Eastern Division. Earlier versions of this article were read to the philosophy depart- ments at Arizona State University; Harvard; Princeton; University of California, Los Ange- les; University College London; and to a discussion group that meets at Oriel College, Ox- ford, under the auspices of David Charles.
    [Show full text]
  • The Immortality of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo
    Trinity University Digital Commons @ Trinity Philosophy Honors Theses Philosophy Department 5-2014 The mmorI tality of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo Julie Stayton Trinity University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/phil_honors Part of the Philosophy Commons Recommended Citation Stayton, Julie, "The mmorI tality of the Soul in Plato's Phaedo" (2014). Philosophy Honors Theses. 2. http://digitalcommons.trinity.edu/phil_honors/2 This Thesis open access is brought to you for free and open access by the Philosophy Department at Digital Commons @ Trinity. It has been accepted for inclusion in Philosophy Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ Trinity. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Julie Stayton The Immortality of the Soul in Plato’s Phaedo In his dialogue, the Phaedo, Plato gives an account of the immortality of the soul. Plato does this through an argument commonly referred to as the “final argument.” The title stems from the fact that the final argument occurs at the finale of Plato’s dialogue and follows three less conclusive “arguments” for the immortality of the soul. My thesis is two-fold. First, I will give an interpretation of Plato’s final argument in the Phaedo, outlining the ontological presuppositions that Plato relies on for the validity of his argument. Secondly, I will discuss some of the key features of the previous three arguments in the Phaedo. It is my view that the final argument stands on its own as an analysis of the immortality of the soul. However, I believe it is useful to examine the previous three arguments in the dialogue in conjunction with the final argument, as several of the key concepts Plato uses in the final argument are introduced and expanded upon earlier.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric(S) of St. Augustine's Confessions
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Communication Scholarship Communication 2008 The Rhetoric(s) of St. Augustine's Confessions James M. Farrell University of New Hampshire, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/comm_facpub Part of the Christianity Commons, Classical Literature and Philology Commons, Ethics in Religion Commons, History of Christianity Commons, Medieval History Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, and the Rhetoric Commons Recommended Citation James M. Farrell, "The Rhetoric(s) of St. Augustine's Confessions," Augustinian Studies 39:2 (2008), 265-291. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Communication at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Communication Scholarship by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Rhetoric(s) of St. Augustine’s Confessions. James M. Farrell University of New Hampshire Much of the scholarship on Augustine’s Confessions has consigned the discipline of rhetoric to the margins. Rhetoric was Augustine’s “major” in school, and his bread and bacon as a young adult. But in turning to God in the garden at Milan, Augustine also turned away from his profession. Rightly so, the accomplishment of Augustine’s conversion is viewed as a positive development. But the conversion story also structures the whole narrative of the Confessions and thus rhetoric is implicated in that narrative. It is the story of “Latin rhetorician turned Christian bishop.”1 Augustine’s intellectual and disciplinary evolution is mapped over a story of spiritual ascent.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Justice in St. Augustine's Political Philosophy and Nigerian
    International Journal of Education and Human Developments, Vol. 6 No 2; July 2020 ISSN 2415-1270 (Online), ISSN 2415-1424 (Print) Published by Center for Global Research Development Analysis of Justice in St. Augustine’s Political Philosophy and Nigerian Political System ONUCHE, Joseph PhD. Department of Philosophy Kogi State University Anyigba, Kogi State Nigeria Abstract St Augustine of Hippo (354-430CE) is the most influential Christian philosopher in western Christianity after Paul the Apostle. This paper analyses justice in Augustine‟s political philosophy as contained in His „City of God‟. It will be argued that, we could learn from his answers to bad politicking which resulted in destruction of State. His answers on various theological and philosophical issues have continued to be relevant in modern theological and philosophical debate. A lot can still be learnt from him even in the area of Church‟s response to bad governance. Augustine‟s argument is that Kingdoms (Countries, nations) without justice are robberies, as Kings (Governors) of such are robbers. This supposition is illustrated with three historical allusions namely: the encounter of Alexander the Great with a Pirate, the establishment of Roman Empire by Romulus, and the establishment of Assyrian Empire by Ninus. Contextually, Nigeria as it is today falls into this category of robberies as the British colonial masters forced this unequal union for their personal, self-seeking and self-interest, to satisfy their libido dominandi. An analysis of what Augustine meant by justice will be carried out. Philosophically, Augustine evaluated justice from Neo-Platonic background and theologically from Pauline concept of justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Legal Punishment of Immorality: Once More Into the Breach
    Legal Punishment of Immorality: Once more into the breach Kyle Swan Department of Philosophy California State University Sacramento [email protected] Abstract: Gerald Dworkin’s overlooked defense of legal moralism attempts to undermine the traditional liberal case for a principled distinction between behavior that is immoral and criminal and behavior that is immoral but not criminal. According to Dworkin, his argument for legal moralism “depends upon a plausible idea of what making moral judgments involves.” The idea Dworkin has in mind here is a metaethical principle that many have connected to morality/reasons internalism. I agree with Dworkin that this is a plausible principle, but I argue that some of the best reasons for accepting it actually work against his enforcement thesis. I propose a principled distinction between the immoral-and-criminal and the immoral-but-not-criminal, and argue that a principle at least very much like it must be correct if the metaethical principle Dworkin avows is correct. legal moralism; liberal neutrality; public justification; Hart-Devlin debate; Gerald Dworkin The recent fiftieth anniversary of the publication of H.L.A. Hart’s Law, Liberty and Morality (1963) finds moral, political and legal philosophers once again considering Hart’s influence on the legal moralism debate.1 The broad outline of the history of the debate is familiar: Hart was attempting to undermine Patrick Devlin’s criticisms of the relatively liberal-minded Report of the Committee on Homosexual Offenses and Prostitution (1957), more commonly referred to as the Wolfenden Report. Devlin published these reactions, along with responses to Hart, in The Enforcement of Morals (1965).
    [Show full text]
  • Spinoza's Ethics Beth Lord
    EDINBURGH PHILOSOPHICAL GUIDES Spinoza's Ethics Beth Lord Spinoza’s Ethics Edinburgh Philosophical Guides Series Titles in the series include: Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason Douglas Burnham with Harvey Young Derrida’s Of Grammatology Arthur Bradley Heidegger’s Being and Time William Large Plato’s Republic D. J. Sheppard Spinoza’s Ethics Beth Lord Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy Kurt Brandhorst Husserl’s The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Phenomenology Katrin Joost Nietzsche’s Thus Spoke Zarathustra Martin Jesinghausen and Douglas Burnham Spinoza’s Ethics An Edinburgh Philosophical Guide Beth Lord Edinburgh University Press © Beth Lord, 2010 Edinburgh University Press Ltd 22 George Square, Edinburgh www.euppublishing.com Typeset in 11/13pt Monotype Baskerville by Servis Filmsetting Ltd, Stockport, Cheshire, and printed and bound in Great Britain by CPI Antony Rowe, Chippenham and Eastbourne A CIP record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978 0 7486 3449 1 (hardback) ISBN 978 0 7486 3450 7 (paperback) The right of Beth Lord to be identifi ed as author of this work has been asserted in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Contents Series Editor’s Preface vi Acknowledgements vii List of Figures viii Introduction 1 1. A Guide to the Text 15 Part I: Being, Substance, God, Nature 15 Part II: Minds, Bodies, Experience and Knowledge 49 Part III: The Affects 83 Part IV: Virtue, Ethics and Politics 103 Part V: Freedom and Eternity 136 2. Study Aids 159 Glossary 159 Further Reading 167 Types of Question you will Encounter 168 Tips for Writing about Spinoza 169 Bibliography 173 Index 179 Series Editor’s Preface To us, the principle of this series of books is clear and simple: what readers new to philosophical classics need fi rst and foremost is help with reading these key texts.
    [Show full text]
  • Competing Enlightment Visions of the Separation of Church and State
    COMPETING ENLIGHTENMENT VISIONS OF THE SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE R. KEVIN HILL I. INTRODUCTION The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."[1] After the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified, a series of Supreme Court cases held that almost all of the provisions of the Bill of Rights were "incorporated" into the Fourteenth Amendment, and thereby applied as against the States as well as against the Federal Government.[2] In particular, in Cantwell v. Connecticut, the Supreme Court held that the Free Exercise Clause protected a Jehovah's Witness engaged in public anti-Catholic diatribes from local prosecution for breach of the peace.[3] Seven years later, in Everson v. Board of Education, the Supreme Court decided that the Establishment Clause also applied to the states, in a case involving the use of public school buses for the benefit of school children attending private Catholic schools.[4] Since Everson, the Court has repeatedly directed its attention toward the intersection of public schools and the Establishment Clause, in an attempt to articulate the precise contours of the Jeffersonian "wall of separation between church and State" in this setting.[5] Of particular interest are the cases dealing with the teaching of Darwinian evolutionary theory in public schools. Cases dealing with school prayer or financial assistance may arouse controversy over the boundaries of establishment, but less often do they pose fundamental questions about the very essence of religion or the purpose of constitutionalizing religious tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Boko Haram's Religious and Political Worldview
    The Brookings Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World AnaLYSIS PAPER | No. 22, January 2016 ‘The disease is unbelief’: Boko Haram’s religious and political worldview BY ALEX THURSTON Table of contents 1 Acknowledgments 3 The author 5 Introduction 7 Inadequate explanations of Boko Haram’s rise 9 Local and global roots 12 An exclusivist worldview 15 Opposing the political system 17 Grievance and reprisal 20 Implementing exclusivism through brutality 22 Boko Haram, Niger, Cameroon, and Chad 24 Boko Haram and the Islamic State 25 Recommendations to the government of Nigeria 27 U.S. policy toward Boko Haram 28 Conclusion 29 About the Project on U.S. Relations with the Islamic World 30 The Center for Middle East Policy 1 | ‘The disease is unbelief’: Boko Haram’s religious and political worldview Acknowledgments I would like to thank William McCants and Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Institution for commis- sioning this paper. I gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments made by two anonymous re- viewers, which helped me to rethink crucial aspects of the paper. I am also grateful to Adam Higazi and Andrea Brigaglia for their suggestions. 3 | ‘The disease is unbelief’: Boko Haram’s religious and political worldview The author lex Thurston is a scholar of Islam and poli- tics. He joined the African Studies Program at Georgetown University in fall 2014, Aoffering courses on religion, politics, and security in Africa. He holds a Ph.D. in Religious Stud- ies from Northwestern University (2013), and an M.A. in Arab Studies from Georgetown University (2009). From 2013–2014, he was an International Affairs Fellow with the Council on Foreign Rela- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Roadmap to Understanding Diverse Legal Approaches to Prostitution in Europe©
    LEGAL PHILOSOPHICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF PROSTITUTION: A ROADMAP TO UNDERSTANDING DIVERSE LEGAL APPROACHES TO PROSTITUTION IN EUROPE© Alicia Danielsson* INTRODUCTION The study of legal theory and philosophy entails conducting philosophical and scientific examinations of law and justice as a social phenomenon.1 This may include engaging with theories and studies about law and justice with potential elements of speculations on the basis of ideas found in numerous disciplines, such as law, sociology, history, political science, philosophy, economics and natural sciences. The aim is to elucidate the character and nature of law, particularly in relation to society.2 In practice, this takes shape in seeking to answer an indefinite range of questions about law and justice, which are not only interesting in themselves but also offer unique insights and an in-depth understanding of legal provisions and concepts in relation to their context.3 Due to the nature and extent of legal theory, it is impossible to consider every possible question which could be raised on a subject matter, especially in subject areas, which may be perceived as controversial, such as laws on prostitution. The vast amount of academic literature available on the subject covers a broad range of different concepts and ideas. This can make it difficult to piece together an initial overview of the core theoretical theories and basic notions before conducting a more in-depth analysis. Due to the vast range of legal theories available on the subject matter, it will only be possible to discuss a carefully selected number. The intention of this paper is to 1 Suri Ratnapala, Jurisprudence (Cambridge University Press 2013) 3.
    [Show full text]