DOCSLIB.ORG

Alexandrium Tamarense

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Alexandrium Tamarense Characterization of grazer‐induced responses in the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense Sylke Wohlrab Dissertation zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Doktors der Naturwissenschaften ‐ Dr. rer. Nat.‐ im Fachbereich 2 (Biologie & Chemie) der Universität Bremen vorgelegt von Sylke Wohlrab 2013 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Allan Cembella Alfred-Wegener-Institut für Polar- und Meeresforschung Bremerhaven Universität Bremen 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Ralph Tollrian Lehrstuhl für Evolutionsökologie und Biodiversität der Tiere Ruhr-Universität Bochum CONTENTS Table of Contents Erklärung gemäß § 6 (5) .............................................................................................................I Danksagung ................................................................................................................................ II Summary .................................................................................................................................... III Zusammenfassung ................................................................................................................... VI Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ IX 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Species Interactions ................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Top-down and bottom-up control ........................................................................... 2 1.3 Harmful algal blooms ................................................................................................ 3 1.4 Dinoflagellates ............................................................................................................ 5 1.5 The Alexandrium tamarense species complex ..................................................... 8 1.5.1 Toxic blooms of Alexandrium tamarense ................................................... 12 1.5.2 Grazing by microzooplankton ....................................................................... 13 1.5.3 Grazing by copepods ...................................................................................... 15 1.4 Induced defense ........................................................................................................ 18 1.5 Secondary metabolites ............................................................................................ 20 1.6 Genes involved in species interactions ................................................................ 22 2. Aim and outline of the thesis ........................................................................................ 25 2.1. Justification and aim of the thesis ........................................................................ 25 2.2 Outline and approach of the thesis ...................................................................... 26 3. Publications ....................................................................................................................... 29 3.1 List of publications and declaration of contribution ............................................. 29 3.2 Further publications ..................................................................................................... 30 CONTENTS 4. A molecular and co-evolutionary context for grazer induced toxin production in Alexandrium tamarense ............................................................. 31 4.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 31 4.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 31 4.3 Material and Methods .............................................................................................. 34 4.4 Results ........................................................................................................................ 39 4.5 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 46 4.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 51 5. Fight and flight in dinoflagellates? Kinetics of simultaneous grazer-induced responses in Alexandrium tamarense ............................................. 52 5.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 52 5.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 52 5.3 Material and Methods .............................................................................................. 54 5.4 Results ........................................................................................................................ 58 5.5 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 62 5.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 65 6. Grazer induced reaction norms - a transcriptomic comparison ............................ 66 5.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 66 5.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 66 5.3 Material and Methods .............................................................................................. 70 5.4 Results ........................................................................................................................ 76 5.5 Discussion .................................................................................................................. 86 5.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 92 6. Mapping genotypic trait alterations in A. tamarense in response to a protistan grazer ................................................................................. 93 6.1 Abstract ...................................................................................................................... 93 6.2. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 94 CONTENTS 6.3 Material and Methods .............................................................................................. 97 6.4 Results ...................................................................................................................... 102 6.5 Discussion ................................................................................................................ 109 6.6 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 114 7. Assembly and functional annotation of a comprehensive expression based gene library to study biotic interactions in the marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense ............................................ 115 7.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................... 115 7.2 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 115 7.3 Material and Methods ............................................................................................ 118 7.4 Results and Discussion ......................................................................................... 122 7.5 Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 131 8. Synthesis .......................................................................................................................... 132 8.1 Induced defense against copepods ..................................................................... 133 8.1.1 Signal specificity and induced defense ...................................................... 134 8.1.2 Grazer induced defense responses and trade-offs .................................. 135 8.1.3 PSTs as defense compounds ........................................................................ 136 8.1.4 Transcriptomic and strain-specific responses towards copepod grazers ............................................................................. 137 8.2 Genotype specific feedback responses towards a protistan grazer ............. 140 8.2.1 Genotype specific gene expression patterns ............................................ 141 8.2.2 Genotype specific trait alterations inferred from functional genomics ............................................................ 142 8.3 Future perspectives ................................................................................................ 144 References ............................................................................................................................... 149 Supplemental material ......................................................................................................... 174 ERKLÄRUNG Sylke Wohlrab Rheinstr. 48 27570 Bremerhaven Erklärung gemäß § 6 (5) der Promotionsordnung
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Trait Changes Induced by Species Interactions in Two Phenotypically Distinct Strains of a Marine Dinoflagellate
    The ISME Journal (2016) 10, 2658–2668 © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/16 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Trait changes induced by species interactions in two phenotypically distinct strains of a marine dinoflagellate Sylke Wohlrab, Urban Tillmann, Allan Cembella and Uwe John Alfred Wegener Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, Section Ecological Chemistry, Bremerhaven, Germany Populations of the toxigenic marine dinoflagellate Alexandrium are composed of multiple genotypes that display phenotypic variation for traits known to influence top-down processes, such as the ability to lyse co-occurring competitors and prospective grazers. We performed a detailed molecular analysis of species interactions to determine how different genotypes perceive and respond to other species. In a controlled laboratory culture study, we exposed two A. fundyense strains that differ in their capacity to produce lytic compounds to the dinoflagellate grazer Polykrikos kofoidii, and analyzed transcriptomic changes during this interaction. Approximately 5% of all analyzed genes were differentially expressed between the two Alexandrium strains under control conditions (without grazer presence) with fold-change differences that were proportionally higher than those observed in grazer treatments. Species interactions led to the genotype-specific expression of genes involved in endocytotic processes, cell cycle control and outer membrane properties, and signal transduction and gene expression
    [Show full text]
  • The Planktonic Protist Interactome: Where Do We Stand After a Century of Research?
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/587352; this version posted May 2, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Bjorbækmo et al., 23.03.2019 – preprint copy - BioRxiv The planktonic protist interactome: where do we stand after a century of research? Marit F. Markussen Bjorbækmo1*, Andreas Evenstad1* and Line Lieblein Røsæg1*, Anders K. Krabberød1**, and Ramiro Logares2,1** 1 University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N- 0316 Oslo, Norway 2 Institut de Ciències del Mar (CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta, 37-49, ES-08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain * The three authors contributed equally ** Corresponding authors: Ramiro Logares: Institute of Marine Sciences (ICM-CSIC), Passeig Marítim de la Barceloneta 37-49, 08003, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain. Phone: 34-93-2309500; Fax: 34-93-2309555. [email protected] Anders K. Krabberød: University of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Section for Genetics and Evolutionary Biology (Evogene), Blindernv. 31, N-0316 Oslo, Norway. Phone +47 22845986, Fax: +47 22854726. [email protected] Abstract Microbial interactions are crucial for Earth ecosystem function, yet our knowledge about them is limited and has so far mainly existed as scattered records. Here, we have surveyed the literature involving planktonic protist interactions and gathered the information in a manually curated Protist Interaction DAtabase (PIDA). In total, we have registered ~2,500 ecological interactions from ~500 publications, spanning the last 150 years.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Oklahoma
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA GRADUATE COLLEGE MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE FACULTY in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY By JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER Norman, Oklahoma 2017 MACRONUTRIENTS SHAPE MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES, GENE EXPRESSION AND PROTEIN EVOLUTION A DISSERTATION APPROVED FOR THE DEPARTMENT OF MICROBIOLOGY AND PLANT BIOLOGY BY ______________________________ Dr. Boris Wawrik, Chair ______________________________ Dr. J. Phil Gibson ______________________________ Dr. Anne K. Dunn ______________________________ Dr. John Paul Masly ______________________________ Dr. K. David Hambright ii © Copyright by JOSHUA THOMAS COOPER 2017 All Rights Reserved. iii Acknowledgments I would like to thank my two advisors Dr. Boris Wawrik and Dr. J. Phil Gibson for helping me become a better scientist and better educator. I would also like to thank my committee members Dr. Anne K. Dunn, Dr. K. David Hambright, and Dr. J.P. Masly for providing valuable inputs that lead me to carefully consider my research questions. I would also like to thank Dr. J.P. Masly for the opportunity to coauthor a book chapter on the speciation of diatoms. It is still such a privilege that you believed in me and my crazy diatom ideas to form a concise chapter in addition to learn your style of writing has been a benefit to my professional development. I’m also thankful for my first undergraduate research mentor, Dr. Miriam Steinitz-Kannan, now retired from Northern Kentucky University, who was the first to show the amazing wonders of pond scum. Who knew that studying diatoms and algae as an undergraduate would lead me all the way to a Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Protocols for Monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for Sustainable Aquaculture and Coastal Fisheries in Chile (Supplement Data)
    Protocols for monitoring Harmful Algal Blooms for sustainable aquaculture and coastal fisheries in Chile (Supplement data) Provided by Kyoko Yarimizu, et al. Table S1. Phytoplankton Naming Dictionary: This dictionary was constructed from the species observed in Chilean coast water in the past combined with the IOC list. Each name was verified with the list provided by IFOP and online dictionaries, AlgaeBase (https://www.algaebase.org/) and WoRMS (http://www.marinespecies.org/). The list is subjected to be updated. Phylum Class Order Family Genus Species Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Achnanthales Achnanthaceae Achnanthes Achnanthes longipes Bacillariophyta Coscinodiscophyceae Coscinodiscales Heliopeltaceae Actinoptychus Actinoptychus spp. Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Akashiwo Akashiwo sanguinea Dinoflagellata Dinophyceae Gymnodiniales Gymnodiniaceae Amphidinium Amphidinium spp. Ochrophyta Bacillariophyceae Naviculales Amphipleuraceae Amphiprora Amphiprora spp. Bacillariophyta Bacillariophyceae Thalassiophysales Catenulaceae Amphora Amphora spp. Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Anabaenopsis Anabaenopsis milleri Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema Anagnostidinema amphibium Anagnostidinema Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Coleofasciculaceae Anagnostidinema lemmermannii Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Oscillatoriales Microcoleaceae Annamia Annamia toxica Cyanobacteria Cyanophyceae Nostocales Aphanizomenonaceae Aphanizomenon Aphanizomenon flos-aquae
    [Show full text]
  • Differentiating Two Closely Related Alexandrium Species Using Comparative Quantitative Proteomics
    toxins Article Differentiating Two Closely Related Alexandrium Species Using Comparative Quantitative Proteomics Bryan John J. Subong 1,2,* , Arturo O. Lluisma 1, Rhodora V. Azanza 1 and Lilibeth A. Salvador-Reyes 1,* 1 Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines- Diliman, Velasquez Street, Quezon City 1101, Philippines; [email protected] (A.O.L.); [email protected] (R.V.A.) 2 Department of Chemistry, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo City, Tokyo 113-8654, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected] (B.J.J.S.); [email protected] (L.A.S.-R.) Abstract: Alexandrium minutum and Alexandrium tamutum are two closely related harmful algal bloom (HAB)-causing species with different toxicity. Using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantita- tion (iTRAQ)-based quantitative proteomics and two-dimensional differential gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE), a comprehensive characterization of the proteomes of A. minutum and A. tamutum was performed to identify the cellular and molecular underpinnings for the dissimilarity between these two species. A total of 1436 proteins and 420 protein spots were identified using iTRAQ-based proteomics and 2D-DIGE, respectively. Both methods revealed little difference (10–12%) between the proteomes of A. minutum and A. tamutum, highlighting that these organisms follow similar cellular and biological processes at the exponential stage. Toxin biosynthetic enzymes were present in both organisms. However, the gonyautoxin-producing A. minutum showed higher levels of osmotic growth proteins, Zn-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase and type-I polyketide synthase compared to the non-toxic A. tamutum. Further, A. tamutum had increased S-adenosylmethionine transferase that may potentially have a negative feedback mechanism to toxin biosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Grazing Impacts of the Heterotrophic Dinoflagellate Polykrikos Kofoidii on a Bloom of Gymnodinium Catenatum
    AQUATIC MICROBIAL ECOLOGY Published April 30 Aquat Microb Ecol NOTE Grazing impacts of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Polykrikos kofoidii on a bloom of Gymnodinium catenatum Yukihiko Matsuyama'f*,Masahide Miyamoto2, Yuichi ~otani' 'National Research Institute of Fisheries and Environment of Inland Sea, Maruishi, Ohno, Saeki, Hiroshima 739-0452, Japan 2KumamotoAriake Fisheries Direction Office, Iwasaki, Tamana, Kumamoto 865-0016, Japan ABSTRACT: In 1998, a red tide of the paralytic shellfish an assessment of the natural population of G. catena- poisoning (PSP)-producing dinoflagellate Gymnodinium cate- turn coupled with a laboratory incubation experiment naturn Graham occurred in Yatsushiro Sea, western Japan. to evaluate the bloom fate. We present data showing The dramatic decline of dominant G. catenatum cells oc- curred during the field and laboratory assessments, accompa- considerable predation by the pseudocolonial hetero- nied with growth of the heterotrophic dinoflagellate Poly- trophic dinoflagellate Polykrikos kofoidii Chatton on knkos kofoidii Chatton. Microscopic observations on both the dominant G. catenatum population, and discuss field and laboratory cultured bloom water revealed that the ecological importance of the genus Polykrikos and >50% of P. kofoidii predated on the natural population of G. catenaturn, and 1 to 8 G. catenatum cells were found in its grazing impact on harmful algal blooms. food vacuoles of P. kofoidii pseudocolonies. Our results sug- Materials and methods. Filed population surveys: gest that predation by P. kofoidii contributes to the cessation The Gymnodinium catenatum bloom occurred from 19 of a G. catenatum bloom. January to 5 February in Miyano-Gawachi Bay, west- ern Yatsushiro Sea, Kyushu Island (Fig. 1). Five cruises KEY WORDS: PSP - Gymnodimurn catenatum .
    [Show full text]
  • The Toxic Dinoflagellate Alexandrium Minutum Impairs the Performance Of
    The toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum impairs the performance of oyster embryos and larvae Justine Castrec, Helene Hegaret, Matthias Huber, Jacqueline Le Grand, Arnaud Huvet, Kevin Tallec, Myrina Boulais, Philippe Soudant, Caroline Fabioux To cite this version: Justine Castrec, Helene Hegaret, Matthias Huber, Jacqueline Le Grand, Arnaud Huvet, et al.. The toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum impairs the performance of oyster embryos and larvae. Harmful Algae, Elsevier, 2020, 92, pp.101744. 10.1016/j.hal.2020.101744. hal-02879884 HAL Id: hal-02879884 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02879884 Submitted on 24 Jun 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. 1 The toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium minutum impairs the performance of oyster 2 embryos and larvae 3 Justine Castrec1, Hélène Hégaret1, Matthias Huber2, Jacqueline Le Grand2, Arnaud Huvet2, 4 Kevin Tallec2, Myrina Boulais1, Philippe Soudant1, and Caroline Fabioux1. 5 1 Univ Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzane, France 6 2 Ifremer, Univ Brest, CNRS, IRD, LEMAR, F-29280 Plouzane, France 7 * Corresponding author: [email protected] 8 Abstract 9 The dinoflagellate genus Alexandrium comprises species that produce highly potent 10 neurotoxins known as paralytic shellfish toxins (PST), and bioactive extracellular compounds 11 (BEC) of unknown structure and ecological significance.
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algae 91 (2020) 101587
    Harmful Algae 91 (2020) 101587 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Harmful Algae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hal Review Progress and promise of omics for predicting the impacts of climate change T on harmful algal blooms Gwenn M.M. Hennona,c,*, Sonya T. Dyhrmana,b,* a Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, United States b Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States c College of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks, AK, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Climate change is predicted to increase the severity and prevalence of harmful algal blooms (HABs). In the past Genomics twenty years, omics techniques such as genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics and metabolomics have trans- Transcriptomics formed that data landscape of many fields including the study of HABs. Advances in technology have facilitated Proteomics the creation of many publicly available omics datasets that are complementary and shed new light on the Metabolomics mechanisms of HAB formation and toxin production. Genomics have been used to reveal differences in toxicity Climate change and nutritional requirements, while transcriptomics and proteomics have been used to explore HAB species Phytoplankton Harmful algae responses to environmental stressors, and metabolomics can reveal mechanisms of allelopathy and toxicity. In Cyanobacteria this review, we explore how omics data may be leveraged to improve predictions of how climate change will impact HAB dynamics. We also highlight important gaps in our knowledge of HAB prediction, which include swimming behaviors, microbial interactions and evolution that can be addressed by future studies with omics tools. Lastly, we discuss approaches to incorporate current omics datasets into predictive numerical models that may enhance HAB prediction in a changing world.
    [Show full text]
  • A Parasite of Marine Rotifers: a New Lineage of Dinokaryotic Dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae)
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Marine Biology Volume 2015, Article ID 614609, 5 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/614609 Research Article A Parasite of Marine Rotifers: A New Lineage of Dinokaryotic Dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) Fernando Gómez1 and Alf Skovgaard2 1 Laboratory of Plankton Systems, Oceanographic Institute, University of Sao˜ Paulo, Prac¸a do Oceanografico´ 191, Cidade Universitaria,´ 05508-900 Butanta,˜ SP, Brazil 2Department of Veterinary Disease Biology, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 7, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark Correspondence should be addressed to Fernando Gomez;´ [email protected] Received 11 July 2015; Accepted 27 August 2015 Academic Editor: Gerardo R. Vasta Copyright © 2015 F. Gomez´ and A. Skovgaard. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Dinoflagellate infections have been reported for different protistan and animal hosts. We report, for the first time, the association between a dinoflagellate parasite and a rotifer host, tentatively Synchaeta sp. (Rotifera), collected from the port of Valencia, NW Mediterranean Sea. The rotifer contained a sporangium with 100–200 thecate dinospores that develop synchronically through palintomic sporogenesis. This undescribed dinoflagellate forms a new and divergent fast-evolved lineage that branches amongthe dinokaryotic dinoflagellates. 1. Introduction form independent lineages with no evident relation to other dinoflagellates [12]. In this study, we describe a new lineage of The alveolates (or Alveolata) are a major lineage of protists an undescribed parasitic dinoflagellate that largely diverged divided into three main phyla: ciliates, apicomplexans, and from other known dinoflagellates.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Dinoflagellate Cysts from the Chesapeake Estuary (Maryland and Virginia, U.S.A.): Taxonomy and Ecological Preferences
    Recent dinoflagellate cysts from the Chesapeake estuary (Maryland and Virginia, U.S.A.): taxonomy and ecological preferences. Tycho Van Hauwaert Academic year 2015–2016 Master’s dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master in Science in Geology Promotor: Prof. Dr. S. Louwye Co-promotor: Dr. K. Mertens Tutor: P. Gurdebeke Jury: Dr. T. Verleye, Dr. E. Verleyen Picture on the cover An exceptionally dense bloom of Alexandrium monilatum was observed in lower Chesapeake Bay along the north shore of the York River between Sarah's Creek and the Perrin River on 17 August 2015. Credit: W. Vogelbein/VIMS ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all I want to thank my promoters, Prof. Dr. S. Louwye and Dr. K. Mertens. They introduced me into the wonderful world of dinoflagellates and the dinocysts due to the course Advanced Micropaleontology. I did not have hesitated long to choose a subject within the research unit of paleontology. Thank you for the proofreading, help with identification and many discussions. A special mention for Pieter Gurdebeke. This appreciation you can imagine as a 22-minutes standing ovation for the small talks and jokes only! If you include the assistance in the thesis, I would not dare to calculate the time of applause. I remember when we were discussing the subject during the fieldtrip to the Alps in September. We have come a long way and I am pleased with the result. Thank you very much for helping me with the preparation of slides, identification of dinocysts, some computer programs, proofreading of the different chapters and many more! When I am back from my trip to Canada, I would like to discuss it with a (small) bottle of beer.
    [Show full text]
  • Removal of the Toxic Dinoflagellate Alexandrium Tamarense (Dinophyta
    Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografía Vol. 50, Nº2: 347-352, agosto 2015 DOI 10.4067/S0718-19572015000300012 RESEARCH NOTE Removal of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense (Dinophyta, Gonyaulacales) by Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata) in controlled experimental conditions Remoción del dinoflagelado tóxico Alexandrium tamarense (Dinophyta, Gonyaulacales) por Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata) en condiciones experimentales controladas Sergio Bolasina1,2, Hugo Benavides1,4, Nora Montoya1, José Carreto1,4, Marcelo Acha1,3,4 and Hermes Mianzan1,3,4 1Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo Pesquero - INIDEP, Paseo Victoria Ocampo N°1, Escollera Norte, (7602), Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina. [email protected] 2Núcleo em Ecologia e Desenvolvimento Sócio-Ambiental de Macaé -NUPEM/UFRJ, Rua São José do Barreto 764, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. (Present address) 3Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina 4Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350 (7600) Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina Abstract.- The objective of the present study is to estimate the removal capability of the ctenophore Mnemiopsis leidyi (Ctenophora, Lobata) on cultures of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium tamarense (Dinophyta, Gonyaulacales). For this purpose, observations on its clearance and survival rates were made in controlled experiments, using different A. tamarense cell concentrations. Mnemiopsis leidyi is able to remove dinoflagellates actively from the water column only at the lowest density tested (150 cells mL-1). Animals exposed to 300 cells mL-1 presented negative clearance and removal rates (survival= 67%). All ctenophores exposed at the highest concentrations of toxic dinoflagellates (600 cells mL-1) died after 4 h. Removal may occur mainly by incorporating and entangling cells in the mucus strands formed by the ctenophore, and in a lesser way by ingestion.
    [Show full text]