DOCSLIB.ORG

Eastern Lake Ontario Draft Unit Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Eastern Lake Ontario UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN DRAFT Towns of Albion, Boylston, Orwell, Richland and Sandy Creek County of Oswego June 2017 DIVISION OF LANDS AND FORESTS Bureau of State Land Management, Region 7 1285 Fisher Avenue Cortland, NY 13045 (607) 753-3095 ext. 217 www.dec.ny.gov Eastern Lake Ontario Unit Management Plan A planning unit consisting of four State Forests, in Oswego County June 2017 Prepared by the Eastern Lake Ontario Unit Management Planning Team: Daniel J. Sawchuck, Senior Forester Acknowledgments The Eastern Lake Ontario Unit Management Planning Team would like to gratefully acknowledge the efforts of all those who contributed to this plan. We particularly would like to thank the following people for information and review they provided: Linda Collart, Mineral Resources Specialist Glenn Wolford, Land Surveyor 3 (Retired) Scott Jackson, Forest Ranger 1 Scott Prindle, Aquatic Biologist 1 Mike Putnam, Wildlife Biologist 1 Thomas Swerdan, Conservation Operations Supervisor 3 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Lands and Forests Region 7 1285 Fisher Avenue Cortland, NY 13045 (607) 753-3095 www.dec.ny.gov 1 DEC’s Mission "The quality of our environment is fundamental to our concern for the quality of life. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the State of New York to conserve, improve and protect its natural resources and environment and to prevent, abate and control water, land and air pollution, in order to enhance the health, safety and welfare of the people of the state and their overall economic and social well- being." - Environmental Conservation Law 1-0101(1) Vision Statement State Forests on the Eastern Lake Ontario Unit will be managed in a sustainable manner by promoting ecosystem health, enhancing landscape biodiversity, protecting soil productivity and water quality. In addition, the State Forests on this unit will continue to provide the many recreational, social and economic benefits valued so highly by the people of New York State. DEC will continue the legacy which started more than 80 years ago, leaving these lands to the next generation in better condition than they are today. This plan sets the stage for DEC to reach these ambitious goals by applying the latest research and science, with guidance from the public, whose land we have been entrusted to manage. 1 Table of Contents DEC’S MISSION ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 VISION STATEMENT ............................................................................................................................................... 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................................. 3 PREFACE ................................................................................................................................................................ 7 STATE FOREST OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................ 7 Legal Considerations ............................................................................................................................................ 7 MANAGEMENT PLANNING OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................................... 7 Public Participation .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Strategic Plan for State Forest Management ....................................................................................................... 8 DEC’S MANAGEMENT APPROACH AND GOALS .................................................................................................................... 8 Forest Certification of State Forests ..................................................................................................................... 8 Ecosystem Management Approach ..................................................................................................................... 9 Ecosystem Management Strategies ................................................................................................................... 10 State Forest Management Goals ....................................................................................................................... 10 LOCATION MAP ................................................................................................................................................... 13 I. INFORMATION ON THE EASTERN LAKE ONTARIO UNIT .............................................................................. 14 STATE LANDS IN THE UNIT ............................................................................................................................................. 14 Table I.A. – State Lands in the Unit .................................................................................................................... 14 Facilities Not Included in this UMP ..................................................................................................................... 14 SOILS ......................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Table I.B. – Predominant Soil Types Found on the Unit...................................................................................... 15 WATER RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................................................... 16 Watersheds ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 Wetlands ............................................................................................................................................................ 16 Streams, Rivers and Intermittent Streams ......................................................................................................... 16 Water Bodies ...................................................................................................................................................... 17 Spring Seeps and Vernal Pools ........................................................................................................................... 18 Table I.C – Water Resources of the Unit ............................................................................................................. 18 BIODIVERSITY .............................................................................................................................................................. 19 Fishery Resources and Fish Species .................................................................................................................... 19 Wildlife Resources .............................................................................................................................................. 20 Species of General Interest ................................................................................................................................. 20 Species of Greatest Conservation Need ............................................................................................................. 21 Table I.D. Species of Greatest Conservation Need by Species Group Likely to be Found On or In the Vicinity of the Unit .............................................................................................................................................................. 22 Endangered, Threatened or Special Concern Species ......................................................................................... 24 Table I.E – Endangered, Threatened or Special Concern Species ....................................................................... 24 Found on or in the vicinity of the Unit.* ............................................................................................................. 24 Forest Type ......................................................................................................................................................... 29 Table I.F - Vegetative Types and Stages within the Unit .................................................................................... 30 Representative Sample Areas ............................................................................................................................. 30 High Conservation Value Forests........................................................................................................................ 32 Table I.G – Representative Sample Areas and High Conservation Value Forests of the Unit ............................. 33 Resource Protection Areas ................................................................................................................................. 34 VISUAL RESOURCES ...................................................................................................................................................... 34 HISTORIC AND CULTURAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • THE SIRICID WOOD WASPS of CALIFORNIA (Hymenoptera: Symphyta)

    THE SIRICID WOOD WASPS of CALIFORNIA (Hymenoptera: Symphyta)

    Uroce r us californ ic us Nott on, f ema 1e. BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY VOLUME 6, NO. 4 THE SIRICID WOOD WASPS OF CALIFORNIA (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) BY WOODROW W. MIDDLEKAUFF (Department of Entomology and Parasitology, University of California, Berkeley) UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES 1960 BULLETIN OF THE CALIFORNIA INSECT SURVEY Editors: E. G: Linsley, S. B. Freeborn, P. D. Hurd, R. L. Usinget Volume 6, No. 4, pp. 59-78, plates 4-5, frontis. Submitted by editors October 14, 1958 Issued April 22, 1960 Price, 50 cents UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PRESS BERKELEY AND LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS LONDON, ENGLAND PRINTED BY OFFSET IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA THE SIRICID WOOD WASPS OF CALIFORNIA (Hymenoptera: Symphyta) BY WOODROW W. MIDDLEKAUFF INTRODUCTION carpeting. Their powerful mandibles can even cut through lead sheathing. The siricid wood wasps are fairly large, cylin- These insects are widely disseminated by drical insects; usually 20 mm. or more in shipments of infested lumber or timber, and length with the head, thorax, and abdomen of the adults may not emerge until several years equal width. The antennae are long and fili- have elapsed. Movement of this lumber and form, with 14 to 30 segments. The tegulae are timber tends to complicate an understanding minute. Jn the female the last segment of the of the normal distribution pattern of the spe- abdomen bears a hornlike projection called cies. the cornus (fig. 8), whose configuration is The Nearctic species in the family were useful for taxonomic purposes. This distinc- monographed by Bradley (1913).
  • The Sirex Woodwasp, Sirex Noctilio: Pest in North America May Be the Ecology, Potential Impact, and Management in the Southeastern U.S

    The Sirex Woodwasp, Sirex Noctilio: Pest in North America May Be the Ecology, Potential Impact, and Management in the Southeastern U.S

    SREF-FH-003 June 2016 woodwasp has not become a major The Sirex woodwasp, Sirex noctilio: pest in North America may be the Ecology, Potential Impact, and Management in the Southeastern U.S. many insects that are competitors or natural enemies. Some of these insects compete for resources AUTHORED BY: LAUREL J. HAAVIK AND DAVID R. COYLE (e.g. native woodwasps, bark and ambrosia beetles, and longhorned beetles) while others (e.g.parasitoids) are natural enemies and use Sirex woodwasp larvae as hosts. However, should the Sirex woodwasp arrive in the southeastern U.S., with its abundant pine plantations and areas of natural pine, this insect could easily be a major pest for the region. Researchers have monitored and tracked Sirex woodwasp populations since its discovery in North America. The most common detection tool is a flight intercept trap (Fig. 2a) baited with a synthetic chemical lure that consists of pine scents (70% α-pinene, 30% β-pinene) or actual pine branches (Fig. 2b). Woodwasps are attracted to the odors given off by the lure or cut pine branches, and as they fly toward the scent they collide with the sides of the trap and drop Figure 1. The high density of likely or confirmed pine (Pinus spp.) hosts of the Sirex woodwasp suggests the southeastern U.S. may be heavily impacted should this non-native insect become into the collection cup at the bottom. established in this region. The collection cup is usually filled with a liquid (e.g. propylene glycol) that acts as both a killing agent and Overview and Detection preservative that holds the insects until they are collected.
  • A Review of the Genus Amylostereum and Its Association with Woodwasps

    A Review of the Genus Amylostereum and Its Association with Woodwasps

    70 South African Journal of Science 99, January/February 2003 Review Article A review of the genus Amylostereum and its association with woodwasps B. Slippers , T.A. Coutinho , B.D. Wingfield and M.J. Wingfield Amylostereum.5–7 Today A. chailletii, A. areolatum and A. laevigatum are known to be symbionts of a variety of woodwasp species.7–9 A fascinating symbiosis exists between the fungi, Amylostereum The relationship between Amylostereum species and wood- chailletii, A. areolatum and A. laevigatum, and various species of wasps is highly evolved and has been shown to be obligatory siricid woodwasps. These intrinsic symbioses and their importance species-specific.7–10 The principal advantage of the relationship to forestry have stimulated much research in the past. The fungi for the fungus is that it is spread and effectively inoculated into have, however, often been confused or misidentified. Similarly, the new wood, during wasp oviposition.11,12 In turn the fungus rots phylogenetic relationships of the Amylostereum species with each and dries the wood, providing a suitable environment, nutrients other, as well as with other Basidiomycetes, have long been unclear. and enzymes that are important for the survival and develop- Recent studies based on molecular data have given new insight ment of the insect larvae (Fig. 1).13–17 into the taxonomy and phylogeny of the genus Amylostereum. The burrowing activity of the siricid larvae and rotting of the Molecular sequence data show that A. areolatum is most distantly wood by Amylostereum species makes this insect–fungus symbio- related to other Amylostereum species. Among the three other sis potentially harmful to host trees, which include important known Amylostereum species, A.
  • Fall in Love with the Falls: Salmon River Falls Unique Area by Salmon River Steward Luke Connor

    Fall in Love with the Falls: Salmon River Falls Unique Area by Salmon River Steward Luke Connor

    2008 Steward Series Fall in Love with the Falls: Salmon River Falls Unique Area By Salmon River Steward Luke Connor When visiting the Salmon River Falls Unique Area you may get to meet a Salmon River Steward. Salmon River Stewards serve as a friendly source of public information as they monitor “The Falls” and other public access sites along the Salmon River corridor. Stewards are knowledgeable of the area’s plants, wildlife, history, trails, and are excited to share that information with visitors. The Salmon River Falls Unique Area attracts tourists from both out of state and within New York. The Falls, located in Orwell, NY, is approximately 6 miles northeast of the Salmon River Fish Hatchery, and is on Falls Rd. Recent changes at The Falls have made them even more inviting. In 2003 the Falls Trail became compliant with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The hard gravel trail allows people with various levels of physical abilities to use its flat surface. In 2008 the Riverbed Trail and the Gorge Trail each underwent enhancements by the Adirondack (ADK) Mountain Club, but are not ADA-compliant. The first recorded people to use the Salmon River Falls Unique Area were three Native American tribes of the Iroquois Nation: the Cayuga, Onondaga, and Oneida. Because the 110-ft-high waterfall served as the natural barrier to Atlantic Salmon migration, the Native American tribes, and likely European settlers, congregated at the Falls to harvest fish. In 1993 the Falls property was bought by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with support from other organizations.
  • Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 Table of Contents

    Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 Table of Contents

    Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 1 2 Town of Sandy Creek Comprehensive Plan - September 2013 Table of Contents Chapter 1: Introduction....................................................................7 Federal and State Land Use Policy............................................................9 Comprehensive Planning and Legislative Authority.............................11 Comprehensive Plan for the Town of Sandy Creek ..............................12 Chapter 2: Goals and Recommendations......................................15 Summary Analysis...............................................................................16 Community Vision Statement...........................................................18 Issues of Community Signifi cance.......................................................18 Strengths and Challenges..................................................................19 Community Goals and Recommended Actions.....................................29 Goal 1: Promote Good Governance.................................................30 Goal 2: Economic Development......................................................34 Goal 3: Environment and Natural Resources Protection.................36 Goal 4: Housing and Community Services ...................................39 Goal 5: Recreation and Cultural Development..............................41 Strategic Plan and Catalytic Projects................................................44 Plan Implementation..........................................................................44
  • Upper Salmon River Unit Management Plan

    Upper Salmon River Unit Management Plan

    Division of Lands & Forests Bureau of State Land Management UPPER SALMON RIVER UNIT MANAGEMENT PLAN FINAL Towns of Florence, Orwell, Osceola & Redfield Counties of Lewis, Oneida & Oswego April 2014 NYS Department of Environmental Conservation Region 7 – Cortland Office 1285 Fisher Avenue Cortland, NY 13045 1 Upper Salmon River Unit Management Plan A Management Unit Consisting of five State Forests, one Fisherman Access site, Conservation Easement Lands and pending acquisition of lands from National Grid, located in Eastern Oswego and Southwestern Lewis Counties Prepared by the Upper Salmon River Unit Management Planning Team: Andy Blum, Forester 1 Dan Sawchuck, Forester 1 Additional Information and Review Provided by: Linda Collart, Mineral Resources Specialist Jonathan Holbein, Assistant Land Surveyor 3 Scott Jackson, Forest Ranger 1 Scott Prindel, Aquatic Biologist 1 Mike Putnam, Wildlife Biologist 1 Thomas Swerdan, Conservation Operations Supervisor 3 New York State Department of Environmental Conservation 1285 Fisher Avenue Cortland, New York 13045 (607) 753-3095 extension 217 2 I. PREFACE The Department of Environmental Conservation conducts management planning on state lands to maintain ecosystems and provide a wide array of benefits for current and future generations. The Upper Salmon River Unit Management Plan addresses future management of Salmon River, Hall Island, Battle Hill, West Osceola, and O=Hara State Forests. This plan is the basis for supporting a multiple-use goal through the implementation of specific objectives and management strategies. Management will ensure the sustainability, biological diversity and protection of the Unit’s ecosystems and optimize the many benefits that these State lands provide. The multiple-use goal will be accomplished through the applied integration of compatible and sound land management practices.
  • SIREX NOCTILIO HOST CHOICE and NO-CHOICE BIOASSAYS: WOODWASP PREFERENCES for SOUTHEASTERN U.S. PINES by JAMIE ELLEN DINKINS (Und

    SIREX NOCTILIO HOST CHOICE and NO-CHOICE BIOASSAYS: WOODWASP PREFERENCES for SOUTHEASTERN U.S. PINES by JAMIE ELLEN DINKINS (Und

    SIREX NOCTILIO HOST CHOICE AND NO-CHOICE BIOASSAYS: WOODWASP PREFERENCES FOR SOUTHEASTERN U.S. PINES by JAMIE ELLEN DINKINS (Under the Direction of Kamal J.K. Gandhi) ABSTRACT Sirex noctilio F., the European woodwasp, is an exotic invasive pest newly introduced to the northeastern U.S. This woodwasp kills trees in the Pinus genus and could potentially cause millions of dollars of damage in the southeastern U.S., where pine plantations are extensive. At present, little is known about the preferences of this wasp for southeastern pine species, and further, little methodology exists as related to conducting host choice or no-choice bioassays with this species. My thesis developed methodology to successfully perform S. noctilio host choice and no-choice bioassays (both colonization and emergence from bolts), examined S. noctilio behavioral and developmental responses to southeastern U.S. pine species using bolts, and investigated possible mechanisms to explain these behavioral responses. Results indicated larger bolts were preferred to smaller bolts by S. noctilio, and P. strobus and P. virginiana were preferred out of six southeastern species in host choice bioassays. KEYWORDS: choice and no-choice bioassay, southeastern pines, European woodwasp, host preference, mechanisms, Sirex noctilio, Pinus SIREX NOCTILIO HOST CHOICE AND NO-CHOICE BIOASSAYS: WOODWASP PREFERENCES FOR SOUTHEASTERN U.S. PINES by JAMIE ELLEN DINKINS B.S. The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, 2009 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Athens, GA 2011 © 2011 Jamie Ellen Dinkins All Rights Reserved SIREX NOCTILIO HOST CHOICE AND NO-CHOICE BIOASSAYS: WOODWASP PREFERENCES FOR SOUTHEASTERN U.S.
  • Southeast Lake Ontario Basin: Tables 1

    Southeast Lake Ontario Basin: Tables 1

    SE Lake Ontario Table 1. Multi-Resolution Land Classification (MRLC) land cover classifications and corresponding percent cover in the SE Lake Ontario Basin. Classification % Cover Deciduous Forest 34.17 Row Crops 24.38 Pasture/Hay 15.53 Mixed Forest 11.01 Water 5.01 Wooded Wetlands 3.17 Low Intensity Residential 2.57 Evergreen Forest 1.32 Parks, Lawns, Golf Courses 1.07 High Intensity Commercial/Industrial 0.79 High Intensity Residential 0.60 Emergent Wetlands 0.24 Barren; Quarries, Strip Mines, Gravel Pits 0.11 SE Lake Ontario Table 2. Species of Greatest Conservation Need currently occurring in the SE Lake Ontario Basin (n=129). Species are sorted alphabetically by taxonomic group and species common name. The Species Group designation is included, indicating which Species Group Report in the appendix will contain the full information about the species. The Stability of this basin's population is also indicated for each species. TaxaGroup SpeciesGroup Species Stability Bird Bald Eagle Bald eagle Increasing Bird Beach and Island ground-nesting birds Common tern Unknown Bird Breeding waterfowl Blue-winged teal Decreasing Bird Breeding waterfowl Ruddy duck Increasing Bird Colonial-nesting herons Black-crowned night-heron Decreasing Bird Common loon Common loon Unknown Bird Common nighthawk Common nighthawk Decreasing Bird Deciduous/mixed forest breeding birds Black-throated blue warbler Stable Bird Deciduous/mixed forest breeding birds Cerulean warbler Increasing Bird Deciduous/mixed forest breeding birds Kentucky warbler Unknown Bird Deciduous/mixed
  • Efficacy of Kamona Strain Deladenus Siricidicola Nematodes for Biological Control of Sirex Noctilio in North America and Hybridisation with Invasive Conspecifics

    Efficacy of Kamona Strain Deladenus Siricidicola Nematodes for Biological Control of Sirex Noctilio in North America and Hybridisation with Invasive Conspecifics

    A peer-reviewed open-access journal NeoBiota 44: 39–55Efficacy (2019) of Kamona strainDeladenus siricidicola nematodes for biological... 39 doi: 10.3897/neobiota.44.30402 RESEARCH ARTICLE NeoBiota http://neobiota.pensoft.net Advancing research on alien species and biological invasions Efficacy of Kamona strain Deladenus siricidicola nematodes for biological control of Sirex noctilio in North America and hybridisation with invasive conspecifics Tonya D. Bittner1, Nathan Havill2, Isis A.L. Caetano1, Ann E. Hajek1 1 Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853-2601, USA 2 USDA Northern Research Station, 51 Mill Pond Rd, Hamden, CT 06514, USA Corresponding author: Tonya D. Bittner ([email protected]) Academic editor: W. Nentwig | Received 7 October 2018 | Accepted 19 December 2018 | Published 4 April 2019 Citation: Bittner TD, Havill N, Caetano IAL, Hajek AE (2019) Efficacy of Kamona strainDeladenus siricidicola nematodes for biological control of Sirex noctilio in North America and hybridisation with invasive conspecifics. NeoBiota 44: 39–55. https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.44.30402 Abstract Sirex noctilio is an invasive woodwasp that, along with its symbiotic fungus, has killed pine trees (Pinus spp.) in North America and in numerous countries in the Southern Hemisphere. We tested a biological control agent in North America that has successfully controlled S. noctilio in Oceania, South Africa, and South America. Deladenus siricidicola nematodes feed on the symbiotic white rot fungus Amylostereum areolatum and can switch to being parasitic on S. noctilio. When parasitic, the Kamona nematode strain can sterilise the eggs of S. noctilio females. However, in North America, a different strain of D. siricidicola (NA), presumably introduced along with the woodwasp, parasitises but does not sterilise S.
  • Steps You Can Take to Stop the Spread of Invasive Species Safety

    Steps You Can Take to Stop the Spread of Invasive Species Safety

    Over 40% of invasive species early detection observations are found by concerned volunteers like you. Thank you for taking time to help strengthen early detection efforts for invasive species. Learn more at www.sleloinvasive.org Safety First 1. Always travel in pairs, use the buddy system & inform someone of your travel plans 2. Always have a first aid kit nearby 3. Wear your life jacket when on the water 4. Bring a means of communications with you, i.e. cell phone or two-way radios 5. Place emergency contact numbers into your phones address book 6. Drink plenty of water on hot days and bring snacks & pace yourself Steps You Can Take to Stop the Spread of Invasive Species Clean Your Shoes & Hiking Gear Report Sightings to iMapInvasives.org • Use online or mobile iMapInvasives app • Take a close-up photo and note your location • For plants, collect a specimen & put in a container and label it with date/location/contact info • Contact Megan Pistolese [email protected] x7724 for plant specimen drop off locations Hemlock Woolly Adelgid Suggested Survey Sites Safety first, always inform someone of your travel plans, travel with a friend if possible, dress for weather and bring snacks/drinks and mode of communication. If viewing digitally, click on site location for more details. Altmar State Forest Battle Hill State Forest Buck Hill State Forest Altmar North of Red Field Westernville Clark Hill State Forest SF Chateaugay State Forest Delta Lake State Park Westernville Richland Rome Forest Park Foster Bake Woods Preserve Happy Valley WMA Williamstown Camden Clayton Izaak Walton trail Klondike State Forest Mexico Pt.
  • NEMATODES for the BIOLOGICAL CONTROL of the WOODWASP, SIREX NOCTILIO Robin A

    NEMATODES for the BIOLOGICAL CONTROL of the WOODWASP, SIREX NOCTILIO Robin A

    NEMATODES FOR THE BIOLOGICAL CONTROL OF THE WOODWASP, SIREX NOCTILIO Robin A. Bedding CSIRO Entomology, PO Box 1700, ACT 2601, Australia ABSTRACT The tylenchid nematode Beddingia (Deladenus) been placed in a separate family of nematodes. siricidicola (Bedding) is by far the most important Poinar et al. [2002] have now placed both control agent of Sirex noctilio F., a major forms of Beddingia species in a new family, the pest of pine plantations. It sterilizes female Beddingiidae). sirex, is density dependent, can achieve nearly At about the time adult parasitized sirex emerge 100 percent parasitism and, as a result of its from infested trees, adult nematodes complicated biology can be readily manipulated have usually released most of the juveniles that are for sirex control. Bedding and Iede (2005) gave a within them into the insect’s blood cavity and the comprehensive account of this nematode and its juveniles have migrated to the insect’s reproductive use in Australia and South America. organs. In the male, this is a dead end but Throughout the 1960s and early 1970s, CSIRO and female sirex are effectively sterilized because, as various consultants conducted a comprehensive well as ovarial development being suppressed search, in hundreds of localities from Europe, to various degrees, each egg that is produced USA, Canada, India, Pakistan, Turkey, Morocco is fi lled with up to 200 juvenile nematodes. A and Japan, for coniferous trees infested with parasitized female sirex still oviposits readily, and any siricid species. Thousands of logs from these often in several different trees, but lays packets trees were then caged in quarantine, mainly at of nematodes instead of viable eggs.
  • South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2011 Synthesis Report

    South African National Biodiversity Assessment 2011 Synthesis Report

    Acronyms CBD Convention on Biological Diversity CR Critically endangered DAFF Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries DEA Department of Environmental Affairs EDRR Early Detection and Rapid Response (programme dealing with invasive alien species) EEZ Exclusive Economic Zone EIA Environmental impact assessment EN Endangered FEPA Freshwater Ecosystem Priority Area IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature KZN KwaZulu-Natal LT Least threatened METT Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool for protected areas METT-SA Global Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool adapted for use in South Africa MPA Marine protected area NBA National Biodiversity Assessment NBF National Biodiversity Framework NBSAP National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan NFEPA National Freshwater Ecosystem Priority Areas project NPAES National Protected Area Expansion Strategy NSBA National Spatial Biodiversity Assessment OMPA Offshore Marine Protected Area project PES Payments for Ecosystem Services SANBI South African National Biodiversity Institute SAPIA Southern Africa Plant Invader Atlas VU Vulnerable WfW Working for Water WMA Water Management Area National Biodiversity Assessment 2011: An assessment of South Africa’s biodiversity and ecosystems Synthesis Report By Amanda Driver1, Kerry J. Sink1, Jeanne L. Nel2, Stephen Holness3, Lara van Niekerk2, Fahiema Daniels1, Zuziwe Jonas1, Prideel A. Majiedt1, Linda Harris4 & Kristal Maze1 With contributions from Lara Atkinson5, Mandy Barnett1, Tracey L. Cumming1, John Dini1, John Donaldson1, Michelle Hamer1,