DOCSLIB.ORG

Primary Care in 34 Countries: Perspectives of General Practitioners and Their Patients. = Eerstelijnszorg in 34 Landen

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Primary Care in 34 Countries: Perspectives of General Practitioners and Their Patients. = Eerstelijnszorg in 34 Landen Primary care in 34 countries: perspectives of general practitioners and their patients Primary care in 34 countries: perspectives of general practitioners and their patients Eerstelijnszorg in 34 landen: perspectieven van huisartsen en hun patiënten (met een samenvatting in het Nederlands) Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Universiteit Utrecht op gezag van de rector magnificus, prof. dr. G.J. van der Zwaan, ingevolge het besluit van het college voor promoties in het openbaar te verdedigen op woensdag 23 november 2016 des middags te 12.45 uur door Wilhelmina Louise Albertine Schäfer geboren op 29 augustus 1984 te Rotterdam Promotoren: Prof. dr. P.P. Groenewegen Prof. dr. F.G. Schellevis Copromotor: Dr. W.G.W. Boerma ISBN 978-94-6122-409-5 © 2016 NIVEL, P.O. Box 1568, 3500 BN Utrecht, The Netherlands http://www.nivel.nl [email protected] Telephone: +3130 2729 700 Fax: +3130 2729 729 Cover design: D. Schäfer Lay out: NIVEL Printing: GVO The research presented in this thesis was conducted at NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, Netherlands. Financial support for studies in this thesis was provided by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 242141 (for the QUALICOPC study). The research was co-funded by a grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW). Contents Chapter 1 General introduction 7 Part I Evaluating primary care Chapter 2 Study protocol: QUALICOPC, a multi-country 37 study evaluating quality, costs and equity in primary care Chapter 3 Measures of quality, costs and equity in 61 primary care: instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 34 countries Part II The breadth of GP service profiles Chapter 4 Two decades of change in European general 111 practice service profiles instruments developed to analyse and compare primary care in 34 countries Chapter 5 Organisational characteristics facilitating 153 a broader range of general practitioner service profiles: an international study Part III Patient perceived quality of primary care Chapter 6 Assessing the potential for improvement of 203 primary care in 34 countries: a cross-sectional survey Chapter 7 GP practices as a one stop shop: how do 249 patients perceive the quality of care? A cross-sectional study in 34 countries 5 Chapter 8 General discussion 283 Summary 317 Samenvatting (summary in Dutch) 323 Acknowledgements 331 Curriculum Vitae 335 List of publications 337 6 1 General introduction General introduction This thesis aims to evaluate primary care service delivery in Europe and in other parts of the world. Strong primary care is expected to meet the current challenges of healthcare systems which are facing increasing numbers of people with chronic diseases and rising healthcare costs [1]. The thesis is written in the context of the international study ‘Quality and Costs of Primary Care in Europe’ (QUALICOPC). The countries studied include 26 EU member states as well as Australia, Canada, Iceland, FYR Macedonia, New Zealand, Norway, Switzerland and Turkey. As primary care is the point where many patients enter the professional healthcare system, easy access and a generalist approach to the health problems people present are important features. The generalist approach implies that health problems are clarified, diagnosed and treated as far as possible and that patients are referred or given guidance when other healthcare services need to be involved [2,3]. Primary care services can be delivered by a variety of providers such as nurses, general practitioners (GPs), pharmacists, physiotherapists, psychologists and social workers [3-6]. In the countries studied in this thesis, GPs are the core providers of primary care services [3]. In the large majority of these countries, GPs have completed a specialised training in family medicine1. In the countries studied, GPs practise almost exclusively in an outpatient setting [7]. As suggested by the title of this thesis, primary care is evaluated from the perspectives of both GPs and patients. This covers how GPs describe their work, e.g. how they organise their practices and what type of services they deliver. The evaluation from the patient perspective includes how they assess the care they receive. Patients’ assessments have become more important during recent decades in the evaluations of healthcare systems and services. Without taking account of these assessments, it is too easy for care delivery to stay provider-centred [8]. 1 In some of the countries, the doctors are called family physicians, family practitioners of family medicine specialists. In this thesis we refer to all these doctors as GPs. 8 General introduction The main question addressed by this thesis is: How can we explain differences within and between countries in the strength of primary care in terms of the breadth of GP service profiles, and how does this relate to assessments by patients? This introductory chapter provides information on the background, research questions, hypotheses and methodology used in this thesis. Background Challenges of health care systems Healthcare systems are currently facing a variety of challenges including increasing numbers of people with chronic diseases and rising healthcare costs. Driven by the available evidence, strong primary care is seen as part of the solution for these challenges [1]. Due to various changes, healthcare systems are being challenged to keep achieving their main objectives, which include improving the health of the population, being responsive to the needs and expectations of the population and providing protection against the costs of ill health for the population [9]. Demographic developments have led to a shift in the nature of health problems from acute and infectious diseases to non-communicable, lifestyle-related and long-term diseases [1,10]. In the coming years there will be further increases in the prevalence of diseases such as diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and depression, as well as a growing number of people with multimorbidity [11]. Moreover, the ageing population means that the availability of the future healthcare workforce is being threatened: the proportion of people of working age will decrease but they will have to deliver healthcare for a larger number of elderly [12,13]. Due to demographic and technological developments, the absolute and relative spending on healthcare are increasing in many countries [4]. As resources spent on healthcare cannot be used elsewhere in society, societies are constantly facing questions about the optimum size of healthcare budgets. Governments are trying to contain healthcare expenditures while tackling the challenge of keeping the population protected against healthcare costs in an equitable manner and also maintaining the quality of care [4]. A final General introduction 9 important change in healthcare systems relates to the changes in the position of patients. More often than before, today’s patients have the possibility of preparing for consultations by looking up medical information about their disease and its potential treatments on the Internet. This may reduce the information asymmetry between professionals and patients. Patients have the option of having a more active and well-informed role in the decisions to be taken about a treatment plan [14], even though this may not be equal for all groups of patients. Healthcare providers need to be able to adapt to these changes. As a response to these changes, decision makers in many countries have focused on strengthening the role of primary care within healthcare systems. This policy direction resulted from the growing evidence about the potential benefits of primary care and has been encouraged internationally by the World Health Organisation (WHO), starting with the 1978 Declaration of Alma Ata [15]. More recently, the WHO stressed the importance of good primary care in the document “Primary Health Care - Now More Than Ever” which was published in 2008 [1]. A recent report published by the European Commission also addressed positive expectations regarding the potential of strong primary care in coping with the current European health systems’ challenges [4]. Strong primary care and responsiveness to patients’ needs and expectations Previous studies found that, in countries with stronger primary care, the healthcare system performs better [16-31], which makes it a potential solution addressing various healthcare system challenges. The current evidence also has several gaps. There is for example only limited evidence on how specific elements of strong primary care relate to patients’ assessments. This thesis focuses on patients’ assessments of primary care as outcomes that are related to the responsiveness to patients’ needs and expectations. This section explains what ‘strong primary care’ is and what is known about the relationship with responsiveness to patients’ needs and expectations. Primary care in a country is characterised as strong when it contains a set of characteristics related to the service delivery process and to its supporting structure [5,14]. First, primary care needs to be accessible, i.e. 10 General introduction close to where patients live and without (for example) financial restrictions. Moreover, patients need to be able to visit their primary care doctors for a broad range of problems and health needs, i.e. the service delivery needs to be comprehensive. Thirdly, it is important that
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Practice Or Primary Health Care? J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.M
    - * ..t *;-gW -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~..._wP..;!-t . .ik. General practice or primary health care? J~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.M.........;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.........j: .-: . J. M. ,uam-.u.,. 'sr. PRIMARY health care in the UK is undergoing a period of extensive review. The 1980s have seen the publication of the green' and white papers,2 the CbeitR. *- icor - -m- --- Cumberlege review of community nursing3 and the Griffiths report on community care.4 Over the same period, the scope of primary medical care has widened, and with the setting up of independent family practitioner committees in 1985, a management framework for family practitioner services is now being created. These recent reports have reflected, rather than resolved, three major tensions in .............. primary care: between individual and population-based approaches, between employed staff and independent contractors and between broad and narrow I ~~~~~i5oms~~~~~~~~~~~~~~mcw~~~~~W-Ff.mw -W definitions of primary health care. These tensions are maintained by the way primary care services are currently provided - by family practitioner committees, district health authorities, local authorities and voluntary organizations, each with different JL i:'.;JicaPjl ways of working. .Dit.X.1 Pemra Gra . ....i Recent policy documents have done little to promote a strategic policy for primary care as a whole.5 In the green' and white ...s papers,2 primary care was reduced to the .~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ activities of those providing family practitioner and community nursing services, with the emphasis on the former, while the Cumberlege report3 made community nursing the mainstay of primary care. Little attempt has been made to balance the .. '': :'!i.! .-".!.. Ei!.!!;-S!5.!Fl! !l'Ili.:. I~~~~.~....! -i .....J ...j.;:l........;i..
    [Show full text]
  • The General Practitioner and the Problems of Battered Women
    of medical ethics, 1979, 5, I17-123 journal J Med Ethics: first published as 10.1136/jme.5.3.117 on 1 September 1979. Downloaded from The general practitioner and the problems of battered women Jan Pahl Research Fellow, University ofKent Author's abstract occur in the 'average' practice, and a summary of This paper discusses the responsibility ofgeneral these estimates was presented by the Royal College practitioners who are consulted by women who have of General Practitioners.2 It was suggested that in been physically injured by the men with whom they an average population of 2,500 there would be live. The paper draws on a study of 50 women likely to be about I50 households living on supple- who were interviewed at a refuge for battered mentary benefit, 6o one-parent families, 25 women, and considers the help which they alcoholics, and 3-4 divorces in any one year. Such received, or did not receive, from their general estimates, of course, take no account of variations practitioners. Such women are likely to face from place to place, nor over time: the I970S have many difficulties: it is perhaps the essence of seen a great increase in the numbers of households their problem that, because it is potentially the living on supplementary benefit, and in the numbers concern of so many people, it can so easily of divorces and, consequently, of one parent families.3 Jefferys estimated that 36 - 4 per cent of all become the concern of nobody-except of the those consulting their general practitioners did so woman herself.
    [Show full text]
  • The Naturalist Tradition in General Practice
    The Naturalist Tradition in General Practice I, r, McWhinney, MD London, Ontario For me there have been two great satisfactions of medical practice. One has been the depth of human experience which, as physicians, we are privileged to have. The other has been the satisfaction of observing patients with illnesses of all kinds, in their own habitat, and over long periods of time. This is the kind of satisfaction experienced by all naturalists. I would claim that observation of prognosis and to rational therapeutics. The clinician, then, has much in the natural history of disease is the Suppose, for example, people with common with the naturalist. “Natu­ basic science of medicine. Nowadays schizophrenia were found to have a ralists,” wrote John Ryle,1 “hold cer­ we use the term “basic science” for biochemical abnormality. This dis­ tain attributes in common, notably the what Abraham Flexner called the la­ covery would have no significance desire to establish the truth of things boratory sciences. There is no harm in without the clinical description of a by observing and recording, by classifi­ this as long as we do not mean that the category called schizophrenia, and a cation and analysis.” Like the natural­ laboratory sciences are more funda­ knowledge of its natural course and ist, the clinician makes careful observa­ mental and more scientific than the outcome. tions of his/her patients, classifies their science of clinical observation. Chemis­ Medicine, like other branches of illnesses into categories, then follows try and physics can explain ill health biology, is predominantly an observa­ them to their conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sociological Approach to the * History of Medicine*
    A SOCIOLOGICAL APPROACH TO THE * HISTORY OF MEDICINE* by THOMAS McKEOWN WHAT HISTORY can teach is a much-discussed question and historians themselves are divided about the answer; what medical history can teach is a question which is not often asked and yet there can be little doubt about the answer. The direction of medical effort, both in service and research, is seriously prejudiced because of lack of the perspective which historical investigation could and should provide. The provision of this perspective, I suggest, should be the main aim of the social historian and I have taken my title from Sigerist's essay on 'The Social History of Medicine' written in 1940. He wrote: 'I would like to draw your attention to a field of studies in the history of medicine that has been greatly neglected in the past. If you open a textbook, any textbook of medical history, and try to find what health conditions were in rural France in the eighteenth century, or what disease meant to the family of an artisan at the same period, you will as a rule not find any information. We know much about the great medical discoveries but very little on whether they were applied or to whom they were applied.' Sigerist ended his essay with these words: 'I think that the sociological approach to the history of medicine not only gives us a better understanding ofthe past but can also help us in planning the future.' On this interpretation, if social history is history with the politics left out, the social history of medicine is medical history with the public interest put in.
    [Show full text]
  • The European Definition of General Practice / Family Medicine
    THE EUROPEAN DEFINITION OF GENERAL PRACTICE / FAMILY MEDICINE WONCA EUROPE 2011 Edition 1 THE EUROPEAN DEFINITIONS of The Key Features of the Discipline of General Practice The Role of the General Practitioner and A description of the Core Competencies of the General Practitioner / Family Physician. Prepared for WONCA EUROPE (The European Society of General Practice/ Family Medicine), 2002. Dr Justin Allen Director of Postgraduate General Practice Education Centre for Postgraduate Medical Education, University of Leicester, United Kingdom President of EURACT Professor Bernard Gay President, CNGE, Paris, France University of Bordeaux, France Professor Harry Crebolder Maastricht University The Netherlands Professor Jan Heyrman Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium Professor Igor Svab, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia Dr Paul Ram Maastricht University The Netherlands Edited by: Dr Philip Evans President WONCA Europe This statement was published with the support and co-operation of the WHO Europe Office ,Barcelona ,Spain. Revised in 2005 by a working party of EURACT Council led by Dr Justin Allen, on behalf of WONCA European Council. Revised in 2011 by a Commission of the WONCA European Council led by Dr. Ernesto Mola and Dr. Tina Eriksson 2 THE WONCA TREE – AS PRODUCED BY THE SWISS COLLEGE OF PRIMARY CARE (Revised 2011) 3 CONTENTS 1. Introductions Page 3 2. The New Definitions and Competencies Statements Page 5 3. Explanatory notes – rationale and academic review new definitions Page 7 4. Explanatory notes , rationale and academic review - core competencies Page 20 5. Appendices Page 25 Appendix 1 – Leeuwenhorst, WONCA and Olesen definitions Appendix 2 – Acknowledgements Appendix 3 -- English Language definitions Using this document This document contains statements of the characteristics of the discipline and the core competences, and then sections with short explanatory notes.
    [Show full text]
  • General Practitioner Perceptions of Clinical Medication Reviews Undertaken by Community Pharmacists
    ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPERS QUALItatIVE RESEARCH General practitioner perceptions of clinical medication reviews undertaken by community pharmacists Linda Bryant PhD; Gregor Coster PhD; Ross McCormick PhD Department of General Practice and Primary Health ABSTRACT Care, The University of Auckland, Auckland, INtroductioN: Delivery of current health care services focuses on interdisciplinary teams and New Zealand greater involvement of health care providers such as nurses and pharmacists. This requires a change in role perception and acceptance, usually with some resistance to changes. There are few studies inves- tigating the perceptions of general practitioners (GPs) towards community pharmacists increasing their participation in roles such as clinical medication reviews. There is an expectation that these roles may be perceived as crossing a clinical boundary between the work of the GP and that of a pharmacist. MethodS: Thirty-eight GPs who participated in the General Practitioner–Pharmacists Collaboration (GPPC) study in New Zealand were interviewed at the study conclusion. The GPPC study investigated outcomes of a community pharmacist undertaking a clinical medication review in collaboration with a GP, and potential barriers. The GPs were exposed to one of 20 study pharmacists. The semi-structured interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim then analysed using a general inductive thematic approach. FINdiNGS: The GP balanced two themes, patient outcomes and resource utilisation, which determined the over-arching theme, value. This
    [Show full text]
  • How Do General Practitioners Manage Eye Disease in the Community?
    Br J Ophthalmol: first published as 10.1136/bjo.72.10.733 on 1 October 1988. Downloaded from British Journal ofOphthalmology, 1988, 72, 733-736 How do general practitioners manage eye disease in the community? P J McDONNELL From the Department ofOphthalmology, St Thomas's Hospital, London SUMMARY A survey of the management of eye disease in the community was carried out in two general practices over a three-month period. During this time there were 238 consultations by patients with ocular symptoms, making up 2-3% of all consultations and giving an annual consultation rate for eye disease of 66 per 1000 persons at risk. The four commonest diagnoses were bacterial conjunctivitis, allergic conjunctivitis, meibomian cyst, and blepharitis, and these accounted for more than 70% of the consultations. A variety of topical and systemic treatments were used, with topical chloramphenicol prescribed in 55% of consultations. Referral to a hospital eye department resulted from 35 consultations, giving a referral rate of 15% of all consultations. copyright. There are few detailed studies assessing the way in Subjects and methods which general practitioners manage eye disease in the community. The most comprehensive data in this The survey was carried out for the three months July country on prevalence of eye disease come from the 1986 to September 1986 in two general practices. One morbidity statistics of the Royal College of General practice consisted of four general practitioners in Practitioners.1 However, their classification of eye Clapham, South with a London, practice population http://bjo.bmj.com/ disease is into broad categories: for instance there of9521 patients.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origin of the General Practitioner
    JAMES MACKENZIE LECTURE The origin of the general practitioner I. S. L. LOUDON, DM, FRCGP, DRCOG Wellcome Research Fellow, University of Oxford, and Honorary Archivist, Royal College of General Practitioners /. S. L Loudon This method, attractive at first sight, confuses instead of clarifying the search. It is far too broad and diffuse when it is applied in practice, for it could have applied to the large majority of medical practitioners before 1800, regardless of the appellation by which they were known at the time, and none of them would have recognized the term. None of these three approaches provides a satisfactory answer. The most logical, and to my mind the only satisfactory method, is to identify the period in which, for the first time, there was a substan¬ tial number of medical men, joined by a sense of corporate identity, who adopted and wished to be known by the title of 'general practitioner'. The search for the origin of the general The justification for this approach is that when it practitioner occurred it was more than just a new and fashionable name. It indicated the existence of a group of medical HPHE answer to the question: "When did the general ** practitioners.the new men of the profession.quite practitioner first appear?" depends largely on how distinct define him in historical terms. Some have dated his from the physicians and surgeons, who openly you and deliberately practised all branches of medicine, that origin from the Apothecaries' Act of 1815 or the Medical Act of 1858.1 that the is medicine, surgery, midwifery and pharmacy.3 They Others, believing concept claimed that their and the demands of the of 'primary care' crystallizes the essential nature of training better than have public entitled them to do so.
    [Show full text]
  • Australian General Practice Trainees' Exposure to Ophthalmic Problems
    ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER ORIGINAL RESEARCH: EDUCATION Australian general practice trainees’ exposure to ophthalmic problems and implications for training: a cross-sectional analysis Simon Morgan MPH&TM, FRACGP;1 Amanda Tapley MMed.Stats;2 Kim M Henderson Grad. Dip. Health Soc. Sci.;2 Neil A Spike FRACGP;3 Lawrie A McArthur FRACGP;4 Rebecca Stewart MClin.Ed., FRACGP;5 Andrew R Davey MClinEpid, FRACGP;6 Anthony Dunlop FRANZCO;7 Mieke L van Driel PhD, FRACGP;8 Parker J Magin PhD, FRACGP2,6 1 Elermore Vale General Practice, Newcastle, New ABSTRACT South Wales, Australia 2 GP Synergy, Mayfield, INTRODUCTION: Eye conditions are common presentations in Australian general practice, with New South Wales, Australia the potential for serious sequelae. Pre-vocational ophthalmology training for General Practi- 3 Eastern Victoria General tioner (GP) trainees is limited. Practice Training, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia AIM: To describe the rate, nature and associations of ophthalmic problems managed by Aus- 4 University of Adelaide, tralian GP trainees, and derive implications for education and training. Adelaide, South Australia, Australia Cross-sectional analysis from an ongoing cohort study of GP trainees’ clinical con- METHODS: 5 Tropical Medicine Training, sultations. Trainees recorded demographic, clinical and educational details of consecutive Townsville, Queensland, patient consultations. Descriptive analyses report trainee, patient and practice demograph- Australia ics. Proportions of all problems managed in these consultations that were ophthalmology- 6 University of Newcastle, Discipline of General related were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Associations were tested using Practice, Callaghan, New simple logistic regression within the generalised estimating equations (GEE) framework. South Wales, Australia 7 Care Foresight P/L, RESULTS: In total, 884 trainees returned data on 184,476 individual problems or diagnoses Newcastle, New South from 118,541 encounters.
    [Show full text]
  • Framework for Professional and Administrative Development of General Practice/ Family Medicine in Europe
    EUR/ICP/DLVR 04 01 01 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH E58474 FRAMEWORK FOR PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF GENERAL PRACTICE/ FAMILY MEDICINE IN EUROPE World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe 1998 EUR/HFA target 28 TARGET 28 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE By the year 2000, primary health care in all Member States should meet the basic health needs of the population by providing a wide range of health-promotive, curative, rehabilitative and supportive services and by actively supporting self-help activities of individuals, families and groups. ABSTRACT This document presents the specific characteristics of general practice as a specialty and the conditions for its development. It provides information for professionals and decision-makers at all levels of the health care system, on the basis of which the most appropriate model can be selected. Keywords FAMILY PRACTICE – trends PRIMARY HEALTH CARE – trends HEALTH CARE REFORM EUROPE © World Health Organization All rights in this document are reserved by the WHO Regional Office for Europe. The document may nevertheless be freely reviewed, abstracted, reproduced or translated into any other language (but not for sale or for use in conjunction with commercial purposes) provided that full acknowledgement is given to the source. For the use of the WHO emblem, permission must be sought from the WHO Regional Office. Any translation should include the words: The translator of this document is responsible for the accuracy of the translation. The Regional Office would appreciate receiving three copies of any translation. Any views expressed by named authors are solely the responsibility of those authors. About the document In recent years, many countries in Europe have embarked on reforms of their health systems, either as part of broad political changes or as specific policies to improve their health services.
    [Show full text]
  • Martin Stattin, MD, FEBO Ophthalmologist & General
    MARTIN STATTIN, MD, FEBO OPHTHALMOLOGIST & GENERAL PRACTITIONER I’m a medical retina specialist, currently employed at the Academic Tea- ching Clinic Landstraße, Vienna Health Care Group. My scientific work focuses on diagnostic and therapeutic challenges of retinal diseases. I’m part of the team of the Karl Landsteiner Institute for Retinal Research and Imaging under the mentorship of Siamak Ansari Shahrezaei, Associ- ate Professor of Ophthalmology. CONTACT MEMBERSHIPS MedBase19-Augenzentrum American Academy of Ophthalmology Heiligenstädter Straße 38 Austrian Ophthalmologic Society 1190 Vienna, Austria Euretina www.stattin.at European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery DATE OF BIRTH Professional Life Advanced Training 9th of June 1980 June 2016 – now & Teaching CITIZENSHIP Department of Ophthalmology Jun 2016 – now Austria Clinic Landstraße, Vienna Health Karl Landsteiner Institute for Care Group, Austria Retinal Research and Imaging LICENSE TO PRACTICE Medical Retina Specialist Vienna, Austria Cataract surgeries: > 1000 Austria Lid/ocular surface surgeries: > 200 United Kingdom Feb 2019 – now IVI, PRP, PDT, YAG: > 5000 Norway Medical University Vienna, Austria Lecture of Methods in Medical Science STUDY OF MEDICINE Jan 2010 – May 2016 Mentoring of Students Department of Ophthalmology Medical University Vienna, Austria Medical University Innsbruck, Jan 2010 – May 2016 Internships (Germany, USA) Austria Medical University Innsbruck, Ophthalmologist Jan 2015 CIVIL SERVICE Austria EBOD May 2014 Fovista Study Personnel Paramedic General practitioner Mar 2010 Eye Banking Personnel Mentoring of Students LANGUAGES Jul 2007 – Dez 2009 German native District Hospital Lienz, Austria SCIENTIFIC AcTIVITIES English IELTS 8 Residency Author of peer reviewed articles in Norwegian B2 international ophthalmic journals: French basic Jan 2007 – Jun 2007 Retina Italian basic Ambulance Augarten Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • General Practitioner Registrars' Opinions of General Practice Training in Ophthalmology: a Questionnaire Survey in the Northern Region
    GENERAL PRACTITIONER REGISTRARS' OPINIONS OF GENERAL PRACTICE TRAINING IN OPHTHALMOLOGY: A QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY IN THE NORTHERN REGION I 2 1 MARGARET R. DAY AN , ALAN W. D. FITT and ROBIN C. BOSANQUET Newcastle upon Tyne and Birmingham SUMMARY To our knowledge, however, no studies have Purpose: Approximately 6% of general practitioners examined the effectiveness of the postgraduate have worked in ophthalmology but to our knowledge training of the 6%2 of general practitioner registrars the relevance of this training has not previously been (vocational trainees) who pass through eye depart­ evaluated. ments. Our aim was to assess the quality and Methods: We sent an anonymous questionnaire to all relevance of general practice training in ophthalmol­ doctors who had held general practitioner registrar ogy in the Northern Region in order that the (vocational training) posts in ophthalmology in the educational content of these posts may be maximised Northern Region during a 5-year period (1989-1994). in the future. Results: Twenty-six of 48 (54%) questionnaires were returned. Twenty-five of 26 respondents (96%) thought METHODS the training was useful, with 22 (91.7%) continuing to An anonymous questionnaire (Table I) and use some ophthalmic practical skills and 17 (65.4%) explanatory covering letter was sent to all 48 doctors said they had received adequate and relevant clinical who had held general practice registrar posts in three exposure. Twenty-one (87.5%) of those in general different eye departments in the Northern Region practice felt that they were more confident with eye between 1989 and 1994. Registrars were identified problems than their peers and 12 (50%) said their referral patterns differed.
    [Show full text]