Baptists Today By, Fred Guldberg
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Baptists Today By, Fred Guldberg [Colonial South Pastors’ Conference of the North Atlantic District, Grace Lutheran Church, Falls Church, Virginia, October 22, 2003] Forward Baptists value above all else their freedom. In his book The Baptist Identity: Four Fragile Freedoms, Dr. Walter Shurden summaries the Baptist system of beliefs using four freedoms: Bible Freedom, Soul Freedom, Church Freedom, Religious Freedom. I will be referring to these freedoms throughout the paper. To supplement Dr. Shurden’s “freedoms” I sent out a list of questions (Appendix B) to Baptist seminary professors, ministers, and members. The responses of four Baptist ministers are also incorporated in the paper: Dr. Clay Nuttal from Piedmont Baptist College, Winston-Salem, NC; Dr. Minor of Beck’s Baptist church in Kernersville, NC; Dr. Mann from Calvary Baptist Church in Winston-Salem, NC; Dr. Newcomer from Twin Cities Baptist Church, Winston-Salem, NC. Their input was incredibly useful. As I cite their answers any added clarifying remarks are found between brackets. Dr. Shurden is also the Executive Director of the Center for Baptist Studies at Mercer University in Macon, Georgia. The center offers a certification program on Baptist theology for anyone who wants apply. Most of the materials used to complete the certification are available on the Mercer University Web Site. Some of these are also incorporated into the paper. Even though Baptists resist all creeds, this does not mean that they ignore their historical roots. The influence of three church fathers rises to the surface of Baptist theology: John Calvin, Jacob Arminius, and Ulrich Zwingli. Some Baptists hold to teachings that can be traced back to John Calvin. Calvinism can be summed up in TULIP theology: Total depravity, Unconditional election, Limited grace, Irresistible grace, and Preservation of the saints. Calvin’s dream was to create a Christian city. This dream found a partial reality in Geneva, Switzerland. Jacob Arminius is credited with developing decision theology. In Arminianism, the person who hears the gospel either is given a spark of grace or has a little spark of good in him so that he is able to respond to the gospel and snake his decision for Christ. Ulrich Zwingli is the famous reformer who challenged Luther on his understanding of the sacraments. He taught that the Lord’s Supper and Baptism were only symbols of the Christian faith and not means of grace that God uses to offer the forgiveness of sins. Introduction In 2009, Baptists will celebrate a huge 400th birthday party. Born in 1609 the Baptist faith has grown from just a handful of frustrated Anglican Christians to 43 million people in over 200 countries. What is a Baptist? The simplest answer is a Baptist is a member at a Baptist church. It is not so simple to pin down Baptist doctrine and practice because Baptists do not use creeds. They do make descriptive statements about the Baptist belief system, but even these do not always agree. One such summary, known as the Baptist Distinctives, uses the word “Baptists” as an acronym (Appendix A). The Baptist Faith and Message is the description offered by the Southern Baptist convention. Although this is only a descriptive document of what Baptists believe, it is a description from the largest group of Baptists in America. History There is a story told about two ministers arguing over when Baptists started. One said, “That’s easy, Baptists started with John the Baptist.” The other replied, “Baptists go back much further than that. Abraham 2 and Lot were surveying the land of Canaan. Abraham said to Lot, ‘All right, you go your way and I’ll go mine!’ That’s when Baptists got started.” (Hull, p. 3) It is true that the spirit of Baptists has been around for a long time. In the early 1600’s two men, John Smyth and Thomas Helwys, joined a group of Puritans and separated from the Anglican Church. This group believed that only Scripture, not creeds and traditions, should be the guide in faith and practice. The church should be made up of believers only, not of people born into the church. The church should be governed by members not church bishops (Shurden, Turning Paints, p.2). By 1607 the two men had crossed over to Holland to escape persecution for their separatist beliefs. It was here that the group came into contact with the Anabaptists. There is some debate among Baptists about the influence of the Anabaptists over Smyth’s group, but the circumstantial evidence seems to be more than coincidental. “In 1609 Smyth performed a radical and scandalous act” (Ibid). Smyth poured water over his own head and Baptized himself. He then proceeded to baptize the whole congregation. He rebaptized because he said that infant baptism was performed by a false church on individuals who could not believe, namely infants. He wanted churches made up of people who “sincerely, deliberately, and freely affirmed Christ as Lord of their lives” (Ibid). For Baptists, Baptism was and still is the sign that a Christian has made a choice to follow Christ. Soul Freedom In his book The Baptist Identity: Four Fragile Freedoms, Dr. Walter Shurden summarizes the Baptist system of beliefs using four freedoms: Bible Freedom -- the centrality of the Bible in the life of a Baptist, Soul Freedom -- every Baptist must deal with God without outside interference, Church Freedom -- the autonomy of a Baptist congregation, and Religions Freedom -- the separation of church and state. After a gathering of Southern Baptists in Charlotte this past summer, this comment was offered, “Our reaction to tension and our respect for each other is what makes us different. We differ on the use of war as a solution to rid the world of terrorism. We differ on how big government should be. We differ on our views concerning homosexuality. Our reaction to these differences is respect. We are humble enough to confess, God has not spoken to us through a burning bush, although he has spoken to us through a passionate Italian [referring to the keynote speaker at the conference], thus our opinion of truth is no more divine than our sisters’ or brothers’ in Christ” (Roy). Another Baptist minister acknowledged, “With freedom, there is risk. Is this dangerous? Not if we are Baptist! A Baptist realizes that Bible freedom will result in various understandings of the Scripture. As individual persons we are not identical, and our experiences of God’s troth will not be uniform. However, I would much rather risk the freedom of turning the Bible loose in the hands of all people, than try to control the process of belief. It is through that freedom that we find the truth” (Hull, 2). There are some Baptists who see their freedoms threatened not from forces without, but forces within their own movement. One Baptist laments some of the dangers to his faith: 1. Baptizing three- and four-year-olds counters believer’s baptism. 2. Creedalizing confession of faith contradicts voluntarism. 3. Stifling dissent violates liberty of conscience. 4. Advancing civil religion negates separation of church and state. 5. Failing to educate new Christians neutralizes a regenerate church membership. 6. Applying excessive Calvinism harms missions and evangelism. 7. Exaggerating pastoral authority downplays the priesthood of all believers. 8. Exalting biblical inerrancy works against the Lordship of Christ. (Deweese, p. l ). 3 This freedom also makes writing a paper on Baptist difficult because there could always be the exceptional Baptist who has a Scriptural understanding of any doctrine. Dr. Nuttal describes the difference, “There is a great difference between the liberal Baptist position and the biblical Baptist position, that is because they use two violently difference hermeneutics.” Original Sin There is almost no understanding of original sin in Baptist theology. A small minority of Baptists holds to Calvinism. These Baptists understand original sin as Total Depravity. But these same Baptists misunderstand the Grace of God. Calvinism teaches that God does not want everyone in heaven. For the rest of the Baptists who are not Calvinists there is no understanding of original sin. A Baptist believes that people still are created in the image of God. “Out of love, God created human beings with a capacity to make choices, including a choice as to whether to live from the vantage point of a relationship with God. Isn’t that what the author of Genesis meant when he had God say, ‘Let us make humankind in our image, according to our likeness’” (Gen. 1:26, NRSV)? God did not make robots, and God does not impose or inject or impute faith. No. God wants each person to respond voluntarily, like a child to a parent or a friend to a friend” (Hinson, p.2). Again on this point it would seem that not all Baptists completely agree. Dr. Nuttal responding to the question, “What does God mean when he says that mankind was created in the image of God?” writes, “It is clear that we were made in the spiritual image of God, with will, personality etc. The question is what did man lose in the fall (-8.” Dr. Nuttal adds as a follow up on original sin, “Sin was introduced into creation by Lucifer, Sin was introduced into the human race by the sin of Adam, when man disobey he fell and began to die physically and spiritually. The image of God he was created in was marred and man was affected by the fall and became totally depraved spiritually, physically, socially, mentally etc. So that he was incapable of providing a remedy for himself. That is why the work of Christ without the work of man is the only hope for eternal life.