Abel Ecology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abel Ecology Abel Ecology Prescribed Ecology Actions Report (PEAR) for Pacific Hills Christian School Lot 1, DP 1087960 Prepared for: Pacific Hills Christian School Report No: AE19-REP-2072-ISS 1 Prepared by: Abel Ecology Date: 25 October 2019 PO Box 495 Unit 2, 10-11 Ferguson Road Springwood NSW 2777 T (02) 4751 9487 BAM Ecology Pty Ltd T/A Abel Ecology E [email protected] 2 Samuel 20:18 ACN 626 221 467 – ABN 37 626 221 467 www.abelecology.com.au Disclaimer This report has been prepared in accordance with the scope of services described in agreement between Abel Ecology and the Client. In preparing this report, Abel Ecology has relied upon data, surveys and site inspection results taken at or under the particular time and or conditions specified herein. Abel Ecology has also relied on certain verbal information and documentation provided by the Client and/or third parties, but did not attempt to independently verify the accuracy or completeness of that information. To the extent that the conclusions and recommendations in this report are based in whole or in part on such information, they are contingent on its validity. Abel Ecology assumes no responsibility for any consequences arising from any information or condition that was concealed, withheld, misrepresented, or otherwise not fully disclosed or available to Abel Ecology. The findings contained in this report are the result of discrete/specific methods used in accordance with normal practices and standards. To the best of our knowledge, they represent a reasonable interpretation of the general condition of the site in question. Under no circumstances, however, can it be considered that these findings represent the actual state of the site/sites at all points. Any representation, statement, opinion or advice, expressed or implied in this publication is made in good faith but on the basis that Abel Ecology, its agents and employees are not liable (whether by reason of negligence, lack of care or otherwise) to any person for any damage or loss whatsoever, which has occurred or may occur in relation to that person taking or not taking (as the case may be) action in respect of any representation, statement, or advice referred to above. Any findings, conclusions or recommendations only apply to the aforementioned circumstances and no greater reliance should be assumed or drawn by the Client. Furthermore, this report has been prepared solely for use by the Client. Abel Ecology accepts no responsibility for its use by other parties. Document History Report Version Prepared by Technical Review by Proofread by Submission Method Date Report Draft A Dr Alison Hewitt Steven Smith Dropbox 15 Oct 19 Report Issue 1 Dr Alison Hewitt Dr Danny Wotherspoon Steven Smith Dropbox 25 Oct19 Report Issue 2 Dr Alison Hewitt Dr Danny Wotherspoon Steven Smith Dropbox 25 Oct19 25 October 2019 ISSUE 2 Page 2 of 90 AE19 2072 REP ISS 2 25Oct19.docx © Abel Ecology, 2019 AD Table of Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................................. 6 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1 Legislative context ..................................................................................................................................... 16 1.1.1 SREP 20 ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1.2 SEPP 19 ........................................................................................................................................................ 16 1.1.3 SEPP 44 Koala habitat protection ............................................................................................................ 17 1.1.4 Scope of the Hornsby Council Flora and Fauna Guidelines ................................................................ 17 1.2 The proposal ............................................................................................................................................... 17 1.3 Sources of information used in this assessment ...................................................................................... 18 2. Biodiversity offsets scheme thresholds 1 and 2 ....................................................................................... 18 2.1 Threshold One: Biodiversity Conservation Regulation 2017 Development area assessment thresholds ........................................................................................................................................... 18 2.2 Threshold Two: Clearing or prescribed activities as listed in the Biodiversity Conservation Regulation 2017 on land included on the Biodiversity Values Map ........................................... 19 3. Landscape features of the site and the locality ..................................................................................... 21 3.1 Site description ........................................................................................................................................... 21 3.2 History of the site ........................................................................................................................................ 22 3.3 Geology and soils ...................................................................................................................................... 22 3.4 Landscape features .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.4.1 Site landscape features ............................................................................................................................ 23 4. Field survey methods ................................................................................................................................. 23 4.1 BioNet Atlas of NSW Wildlife website search .......................................................................................... 23 4.2 Field work effort ......................................................................................................................................... 27 4.3 Flora survey method, vegetation community and habitat classification .......................................... 28 4.4 Simplified vegetation integrity assessment ............................................................................................. 28 4.5 Fauna survey method ............................................................................................................................... 29 4.5.1 Diurnal fauna searches ............................................................................................................................. 29 4.6 Species likely to occur .............................................................................................................................. 29 4.7 Limitations of the survey ............................................................................................................................ 29 4.8 Staff associated with the field work ........................................................................................................ 30 5. Survey Results: Vegetation and habitat description ............................................................................... 30 5.1 Site vegetation and habitat ..................................................................................................................... 30 5.2 Species and Communities of conservation concern ........................................................................... 31 5.3 Weeds ......................................................................................................................................................... 31 6. Survey Results: Fauna ................................................................................................................................ 32 6.1 Species of conservation concern ............................................................................................................ 32 6.2 Fauna results ............................................................................................................................................... 32 6.3 Fauna Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 36 6.4 Microbats .................................................................................................................................................... 36 6.5 Feral fauna ................................................................................................................................................. 37 7. Discussion of results .................................................................................................................................... 37 8. Impact on biodiversity: Threshold 3 ......................................................................................................... 37 8.1 Threshold 3: Five-part test summary ........................................................................................................ 37 9. Planning Instruments .................................................................................................................................. 40 25 October 2019 ISSUE 2 Page
Recommended publications
  • Research Matters Newsletter of the Australian Flora Foundation
    A charity fostering scientific research into the biology and cultivation of the Australian flora Research Matters Newsletter of the Australian Flora Foundation No. 31, January 2020 Inside 2. President’s Report 2019 3. AFF Grants Awarded 5. Young Scientist Awards 8. From Red Boxes to the World: The Digitisation Project of the National Herbarium of New South Wales – Shelley James and Andre Badiou 13. Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae) aka Guinea Flowers – Betsy Jackes 18. The Joy of Plants – Rosanne Quinnell 23. What Research Were We Funding 30 Years Ago? 27. Financial Report 28. About the Australian Flora Foundation President’s Report 2019 Delivered by Assoc. Prof. Charles Morris at the AGM, November 2019 A continuing development this year has been donations from Industry Partners who wish to support the work of the Foundation. Bell Art Australia started this trend with a donation in 2018, which they have continued in 2019. Source Separation is now the second Industry Partner sponsoring the Foundation, with a generous donation of $5,000. Other generous donors have been the Australian Plants Society (APS): APS Newcastle ($3,000), APS NSW ($3,000), APS Sutherland ($500) and SGAP Mackay ($467). And, of course, there are the amounts from our private donors. In August, the Council was saddened to hear of the death of Dr Malcolm Reed, President of the Foundation from 1991 to 1998. The Foundation owes a debt of gratitude to Malcolm; the current healthy financial position of the Foundation has its roots in a series of large donations and bequests that came to the Foundation during his tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Rare Or Threatened Vascular Plant Species of Wollemi National Park, Central Eastern New South Wales
    Rare or threatened vascular plant species of Wollemi National Park, central eastern New South Wales. Stephen A.J. Bell Eastcoast Flora Survey PO Box 216 Kotara Fair, NSW 2289, AUSTRALIA Abstract: Wollemi National Park (c. 32o 20’– 33o 30’S, 150o– 151oE), approximately 100 km north-west of Sydney, conserves over 500 000 ha of the Triassic sandstone environments of the Central Coast and Tablelands of New South Wales, and occupies approximately 25% of the Sydney Basin biogeographical region. 94 taxa of conservation signiicance have been recorded and Wollemi is recognised as an important reservoir of rare and uncommon plant taxa, conserving more than 20% of all listed threatened species for the Central Coast, Central Tablelands and Central Western Slopes botanical divisions. For a land area occupying only 0.05% of these divisions, Wollemi is of paramount importance in regional conservation. Surveys within Wollemi National Park over the last decade have recorded several new populations of signiicant vascular plant species, including some sizeable range extensions. This paper summarises the current status of all rare or threatened taxa, describes habitat and associated species for many of these and proposes IUCN (2001) codes for all, as well as suggesting revisions to current conservation risk codes for some species. For Wollemi National Park 37 species are currently listed as Endangered (15 species) or Vulnerable (22 species) under the New South Wales Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995. An additional 50 species are currently listed as nationally rare under the Briggs and Leigh (1996) classiication, or have been suggested as such by various workers. Seven species are awaiting further taxonomic investigation, including Eucalyptus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Index to NSW TSSC Final Determinations
    NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee Index to Final Determinations – 1996 –2018 (Updated to 27/4/2018) Listing of threatened species, populations and ecological communities in NSW from 1996 to 25th August 2017 was undertaken by the NSW Scientific Committee established under the Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995. The extinction risk of species, populations and ecological communities were assessed at the State scale under this Act. However, it should be noted that assessments of species endemic to NSW (ie species that only occur in NSW) is equivalent to a national scale assessment. The NSW Threatened Species Scientific Committee (NSWTSSC) is established under the Biodiversity Conservation Act, 2016 which commenced on 25th August 2017. Under ths Act, species and ecological communities are assessed at the national scale. If a species or ecological community is not threatened at the national scale then it can be assessed at the State scale and can be listed as threatened if it meets the criteria for listing in NSW. The NSWTSSC identifies and assesses species and ecological communities for listing as threatened in the Schedules of the Act as follows: Schedule 1 – Critically endangered (CR), Endangered (E) and Vulnerable (V) species Schedule 2 – Critically endangered (CREEC), Endangered (EEC) and Vulnerable (VEC) ecological communities Schedule 3 – Extinct species (EX), species extinct in the wild and collapsed ecological communities Schedule 4 – Key threatening processes (KTP) Final determinations include the reasons for listing and are available for those entities listed or reviewed by the Committee since the Threatened Species Conservation Act, 1995 commenced in 1996. Final determinations made prior to 25th August 2017 refer to the listing criteria and provisons of the Threatended Species Conservation Act and Regulations.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Rarity: Species Distributional Patterns, Population Genetics, Pollination Biology, and Seed Dispersal in Persoonia (Proteaceae)
    University of Wollongong Thesis Collections University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Year Plant rarity: species distributional patterns, population genetics, pollination biology, and seed dispersal in Persoonia (Proteaceae) Paul D. Rymer University of Wollongong Rymer, Paul D, Plant rarity: species distributional patterns, population genetics, pollination biology, and seed dispersal in Persoonia (Proteaceae), PhD thesis, School of Biological Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2006. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/634 This paper is posted at Research Online. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/634 1 Plant rarity: species distributional patterns, population genetics, pollination biology, and seed dispersal in Persoonia (Proteaceae). PhD Thesis by Paul D. Rymer B.Sc. (Hons) – Uni. of Western Sydney School of Biological Sciences UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG 2006 2 DECLARATION This thesis is submitted, in accordance with the regulations of the University of Wollongong, in fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The work described in this thesis was carried out by me, except where otherwise acknowledged, and has not been submitted to any other university or institution. 3 “Yes, Duckie, you’re lucky you’re not Herbie Hart who has taken his Throm-dim-bu-lator apart” (Dr. Seuss 1973) 4 Abstract An understanding of rarity can provide important insights into evolutionary processes, as well as valuable information for the conservation management of rare and threatened species. In this research, my main objective was to gain an understanding of the biology of rarity by investigating colonization and extinction processes from an ecological and evolutionary perspective. I have focused on the genus Persoonia (family Proteaceae), because these plants are prominent components of the Australian flora and the distributional patterns of species vary dramatically, including several that are listed as threatened.
    [Show full text]
  • North Head Site Story
    Overview of North Head North Head, a tied island formed approximately 90 million years ago, is the northern headland at the entrance to Sydney Harbour. Derived from Hawkesbury Sandstone and Newport formations, the headland is comprised of predominantly sandstone and shale, which support a mosaic of different vegetation types. This land is managed by National Parks and Wildlife Service, Sydney Harbour Federation Trust, Q Station, The Australian Institute of Police Management and the North Head Sewerage Treatment Plant, Northern Beaches Council and others. North Head is a national heritage site. Banksia aemula, a characteristic species of Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub (ESBS), with Leptospermum laevigatum dominated senescent Flora at North Head ESBS in the background. North Head is dominated by dense sclerophyllous vegetation, which comprises eight distinct bentwing bat (Miniopterus schreibersii oceanensis).Two vegetation communities, including Coastal notable, and somewhat iconic, species that occur Sandstone Plateau Heath, Coastal Rock-plate at North Head are the long-nosed bandicoot Heath, Coastal Sandstone Ridgetop Woodland and (Perameles nasuta) and the little penguin the endangered Eastern Suburbs Banksia Scrub (Eudyptula minor), with both listed as threatened (ESBS). Characteristic species of plants within populations. these communities include the smooth-barked Several major threats to both flora and fauna occur apple (Angophora costata), red bloodwood (Corymbia at North Head. These include predation by gummifera), coastal tea tree (Leptospermum laevigatum), domestic and feral animals, vehicle strike heath-leaved banksia (Banksia ericifolia) and the (particularly bandicoots), fragmentation and loss of coastal banksia (Banksia integrifolia). A total of more habitat, weed infestation, inappropriate fire than 460 plant species have been recorded within regimes and stormwater runoff (increasing these communities so far, including the sunshine nutrients and the spread of weeds).
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Persoonia Hirsuta</I>
    Emery and Offord (2019). Seed Science and Technology, 47, 1, 107-112. https://doi.org/10.15258/sst.2019.47.1.12 Research Note The effect of the endocarp, heat-shock and short-term storage on the germination of Persoonia hirsuta (Proteaceae) seeds Nathan J. Emery* and Catherine A. Offord The Australian PlantBank, the Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust, the Australian Botanic Garden Mount Annan, NSW 2567 Australia * Author for correspondence (E-mail: [email protected]) (Submitted November 2018; Accepted February 2019; Published online April 2019) Abstract Persoonia are Proteaceous shrubs or small trees that have a woody endocarp as part of the dispersal unit. Seeds with this structure are often difficult to germinate. The endangered Persoonia hirsuta (hairy geebung) is a high- interest plant species for which no previous seed biology research has been conducted. In the present study we investigated the seed germination response to heat and short-term ex situ storage at low and room temperature. The effect of pre- and post-storage endocarp removal on germination was also examined. Germination success was significantly reduced when the endocarp was removed prior to storage due to increased microbial contamination coming from within the seeds. There was no significant effect of heat-shock on germination. Based on these findings, it is recommended that the endocarp be retained when storing or direct-sowing P. hirsuta seeds to enhance the likelihood of producing viable seedlings. Keywords: germination, hairy geebung, microbial contamination, Proteaceae, pyrene, seed biology Experimental and discussion A Persoonia fruit is a drupe which has an outer fleshy mesocarp and leathery pericarp layers, and a hard, woody endocarp within that encapsulates either one or two embryos that are surrounded by a thin, papery testa.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Threatened Flora
    Draft Sydney Growth Centres Strategic Assessment Report 5 Threatened flora This section provides a detailed assessment of the presence and potential impacts of development on ten EPBC listed threatened flora species that occur within the Growth Centres. These flora species are Downy Wattle ( Acacia pubescens), Cynanchum elegans, Darwinia biflora, Dillwynia tenuifolia, Small- flowered Grevillea (Grevillea parviflora subsp. Parviflora), Micromyrtus minutiflora, Persoonia hirsuta, Persoonia nutans, Pimelea spicata and Pultenaea parviflora. The analysis provided for each species considers the following: • relevant background information on the species, including known distribution, habitat requirements and level of existing reservation (if known); • known and likely presence of the species within the Growth Centres and the importance of these areas to the species’ conservation; • potential impacts to known and likely areas supporting the species as a result of development within the Growth Centres; • proposed strategies to mitigate and manage any potential impacts; • proposed measures to offset any residual impacts to the species; and • the conservation or net outcome for the species. INFORMATION BASE The information that has been used to inform this assessment has come from a variety of sources. Relevant species profiles, recovery plans and scientific journal articles have provided background information on each species. The key resource used to provide information on species known presence within the Growth Centres was the NSW Wildlife Atlas (the Atlas), as well as any ecological survey reports prepared as part of the detailed precinct planning of the Program. The Atlas is a database of flora and fauna records across NSW. It currently holds over 4 million records and is managed and maintained by DECCW.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawkesbury-Nepean, New South Wales
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Guide to Users Background What is the summary for and where does it come from? This summary has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. It highlights important elements of the biodiversity of the region in two ways: • Listing species which may be significant for management because they are found only in the region, mainly in the region, or they have a conservation status such as endangered or vulnerable. • Comparing the region to other parts of Australia in terms of the composition and distribution of its species, to suggest components of its biodiversity which may be nationally significant. The summary was produced using the Australian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. The list of families covered in ANHAT is shown in Appendix 1. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are are not not included included in the in the summary. • The data used for this summary come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect.
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Conservation Advice for Persoonia Hirsuta
    This Conservation Advice was approved by the Minister on 29 Apr 2014 Approved Conservation Advice for Persoonia hirsuta (s266B of the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999) This Conservation Advice has been developed based on the best available information at the time this Conservation Advice was approved; this includes existing plans, records or management prescriptions for this species. Description Persoonia hirsuta, Family Proteaceae, also known as the Hairy Geebung, is a spreading shrub growing to 1 m tall. It is best distinguished from other geebungs by its hairiness, having long coarse hairs on flowers and branchlets and short stiff ones on the leaves. Its leaves are small, from 6 - 12 mm long, oblong to narrow in shape and crowded along the stems; they are curled under at the edges. Groups of flowers grow into a leafy shoot. The tubular flowers are yellow or orange and about 1 cm long and also hairy (Harden, 2002; DECCW, 2005). Conservation Status Persoonia hirsuta is listed as endangered. This species is eligible for listing as endangered under the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (Cwlth) (EPBC Act) as, prior to the commencement of the EPBC Act, it was listed as endangered under Schedule 1 of the Endangered Species Protection Act 1992 (Cwlth). Persoonia hirsuta is also listed as endangered under the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (New South Wales). Distribution and Habitat Persoonia hirsuta has a scattered distribution around Sydney. This species is distributed from Singleton in the north, along the east coast to Bargo in the south and the Blue Mountains to the west (DECC, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Recovery Plan for Grevillea Caleyi R
    Approved Recovery Plan for Grevillea caleyi R. Br. (Proteaceae) Approved Recovery Plan Grevillea caleyi R. Br. (Proteaceae) Recovery Plan March 2004 Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) Approved Recovery Plan for Grevillea caleyi R. Br. (Proteaceae) © Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), 2004 This work is copyright, however material presented in this plan may be copied for personal use or published for educational purposes, providing that any extracts are fully acknowledged. Apart from this and any other use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced without prior written permission from the DEC. The NPWS is part of the Department of Environment and Conservation. Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) 43 Bridge Street (PO Box 1967) Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel: 02 9585 6444 www.nationalparks.nsw.gov.au Requests for information or comments regarding this recovery plan should be directed to:- Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW) C/- Grevillea caleyi Recovery Program Co-ordinator Threatened Species Unit Conservation Programs and Planning, Metropolitain Region P.O. Box 1967 Hurstville NSW 2220 Tel 02 9585 6678 Cover illustration: photograph of Grevillea caleyi by Andrew Marshall This plan should be cited as following Department of Environment and Conservation (2004) Grevillea caleyi R. Br. (Proteaceae) Recovery Plan. Department of Environment and Conservation (NSW), Hurstville. ISBN: 0731369076 Approved Recovery Plan for Grevillea caleyi R. Br. (Proteaceae) Grevillea caleyi Recovery Plan Executive Summary The conservation of threatened species, populations and ecological communities is crucial for the maintenance of this States unique biodiversity. In NSW the Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act) provides the framework to conserve and recover species, populations and communities through the preparation and implementation of recovery plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Persoonia Hirsuta Research Report, South32 2
    THE PERSOONIA PUZZLE: RESEARCH REPORT ON THE CONSERVATION BIOLOGY OF PERSOONIA HIRSUTA Persoonia hirsuta Research Report, South32 2 Acknowledgements This report has been prepared on behalf of South32 by Alison Haynes, consultant in plant science and ecology, and David Gregory, EnvironMental Specialist at South32. Thanks to staff at Royal Botanic Gardens and DoMain Trust (PlantBank at Mt Annan), in particular, Dr Nathan EMery, for their help in providing data and reviewing the docuMent and giving perMission to use photographs froM nuMerous stages of the research. June 2021 Cover iMages: Nathan EMery Abbreviations BC: Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016 EPBC: EnvironMent Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 ( EPBC Act) (Federal) SPRAT: Species Profile and Threats Database TSC: Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (NSW) UOW: University of Wollongong Persoonia hirsuta Research Report, South32 3 Table of Contents 1. Introducing Persoonia hirsuta, the Hairy Geebung..............................................................4 2. Previous ManageMent and conservation actions..............................................................13 3. DeMography and habitat requireMents..............................................................................16 4. Pollination biology of Persoonia hirsuta.............................................................................22 5. Soil seedbank dynaMics...................................................................................................28 6. In the field: phenology,
    [Show full text]
  • The Native Vegetation of Yengo and Parr Reserves and Surrounds
    The Native Vegetation of Yengo and Parr Reserves and Surrounds THE NATIVE VEGETATION OF YENGO AND PARR RESERVES AND SURROUNDS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS For enquiries regarding this report please contact This project was funded by the Central Branch, the Manager, Information and Assessment Parks and Wildlife Group, Biodiversity Survey Section, Metropolitan Branch, Environment Priorities Program Protection and Regulation Group, Department of Environment and Climate Change, Hurstville. This report should be referenced as follows: DECC (2008) The Native Vegetation of Yengo Yengo and Parr Reserves and Surrounds. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW, Hurstville. Map data is supplied by the Department of Environment and Climate Change. Maps are copyright Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW. They are not guaranteed to be free from error or omission. The Department of Environment and Climate Change and its employees disclaim liability for any act done on the information in the map and any consequences of such acts or omissions. Photographs are copyright Department of Environment and Climate Change or the individual photographer. Thankyou to: The numerous landowners neighbouring the park who provided access through their properties and local knowledge, including John Tullock, Rod Wallace, Jack Broadbent, Jim Donavan, Ross Darby, Merv Payne, P. Trenchev, June McQueen, Dale Segut, Ryan and Leanne Lambert, Tony Harvey, Lawson Stein, Jan Scott and Noeline Smith. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change 43 Bridge St, Hurstville NSW 2220 PO Box 1967, Hurstville NSW 1482 Phone (02) 995 5000 (switchboard) www.environment.nsw.gov.au The Department of Environment and Climate Change is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged.
    [Show full text]