DOCSLIB.ORG

Guided Reading, New Ideas 1400–1750, Lesson 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Guided Reading, New Ideas 1400–1750, Lesson 3 NAME DATE CLASS Guided Reading New Ideas 1400–1750 Lesson 3 The Scientific Revolution ESSENTIAL QUESTION • How do new ideas change the way people live? Early Science 1. Explaining How did the ancient Greeks develop theories? Listing The first column below identifies three thinkers who lived during ancient times or the Middle Ages. Write one contribution for each. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom Education. is granted for to reproduce Permission use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Thinkers Contributions Aristotle 2. Ptolemy 3. Thomas Aquinas 4. NAME DATE CLASS Guided Reading Cont. New Ideas 1400–1750 True or False Use your textbook to determine if each statement is true or false. Write T or F in the blank next to the statement. If the statement is false, rewrite the underlined portion to make it true. 5. During the Middle Ages, ideas about science were based mostly on ancient Egyptian writing. 6. During the Middle Ages, the Islamic world had little influence on Europeans. 7. Beginning in the 1400s, explorers added to the scientific knowledge of Europe. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom Education. is granted for to reproduce Permission use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill NAME DATE CLASS Guided Reading Cont. New Ideas 1400–1750 New Ideas About the Universe Describing You are a historian recording the various contributions made by Copernicus, Kepler, and Galileo. Describe some of those contributions on the scrolls below. 1. Copernicus 2. Kepler Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom Education. is granted for to reproduce Permission use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill 3. Galileo NAME DATE CLASS Guided Reading Cont. New Ideas 1400–1750 New Scientific Advances Identifying During the 1600s and 1700s, several scientists made significant advances. Below is a list of scientists from this time period. Beneath it is a list of statements about the advances made by these scientists. Fill in the blank in each statement with the name of the correct scientist. Isaac Newton Antonie van Leeuwenhoek Andreas Vesalius Robert Boyle Robert Hooke Antoine Lavoisier 1. proved that all matter is made of elements. 2. described the human body in detail. 3. proved that matter needs oxygen to burn. 4. developed the law of gravity. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom Education. is granted for to reproduce Permission use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill 5. used a microscope to discover cells. 6. discovered tiny organisms called bacteria. NAME DATE CLASS Guided Reading Cont. New Ideas 1400–1750 The Triumph of Reason 1. Explaining Why was mathematics important to the thinking of Descartes? Categorizing The French thinker Blaise Pascal believed that science could be helpful in some ways. He also thought that Christianity could be helpful in other ways. In the chart below, describe what Pascal thought was the best way to use science and the best way to use Christianity. Subject Best Way to Use Science 2. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom Education. is granted for to reproduce Permission use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Christianity 3. NAME DATE CLASS Guided Reading Cont. New Ideas 1400–1750 4. Organizing The English thinker Francis Bacon developed the scientific method. This method is an orderly way of collecting and analyzing information. It can be broken down into a series of steps that must be done in a certain order. Below is a list of steps used in the scientific method in the wrong order. In the blanks below, rearrange these steps so that they are in the correct order. Arrange the Steps of the Scientific Method in the Correct Order a. experiment to test explanation b. repeat experiments to prove the explanation true or false c. observe facts find explanation of facts d. Copyright © McGraw-Hill Education. Permission is granted to reproduce for classroom Education. is granted for to reproduce Permission use. Copyright © McGraw-Hill.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Course in the History of Biology: II
    A Course in the History of Biology: II By RICHARDP. AULIE Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/abt/article-pdf/32/5/271/26915/4443048.pdf by guest on 01 October 2021 * Second part of a two-part article. An explanation of the provements in medical curricula, and the advent of author's history of biology course for high school teachers, human dissections; (ii) the European tradition in together with abstracts of two of the course topics-"The Greek View of Biology" and "What Biology Owes the Arabs" anatomy, which was influenced by Greek and Arab -was presented in last month's issue. sources and produced an indigenous anatomic liter- ature before Vesalius; and (iii) Vesalius' critical The Renaissance Revolution in Anatomy examination of Galen, with his introduction of peda- urely a landmark in gogic innovations in the Fabrica. This landmark thus shows the coalescing of these several trends, all - 1- q -thei history of biology is De Humani Corpo- expressed by the Renaissance artistic temperament, and all rendered possible by the new printing press, - 1 P risi tFabrica Libri Sep- engraving, and improvements in textual analysis. - - ~~~tern("Seven Books on the Workings of By contrast with Arab medicine, which flourished the Human Body"), in an extensive hospital system, Renaissance anatomy published in 1543 by was associated from the start with European univer- sities, which were peculiarly a product of the 12th- Vesalius of -- ~~~~~Andreas E U I Brussels (1514-1564). century West. As a preface to Vesalius, the lectures In our course in the on this topic gave attention to the founding of the universities of Bologna (1158), Oxford (c.
    [Show full text]
  • Mayo Foundation House Window Illustrates the Eras of Medicine
    FEATURE HISTORY IN STAINED GLASS Mayo Foundation House window illustrates the eras of medicine BY MICHAEL CAMILLERI, MD, AND CYNTHIA STANISLAV, BS 12 | MINNESOTA MEDICINE | MARCH/APRIL 2020 FEATURE Mayo Foundation House window illustrates the eras of medicine BY MICHAEL CAMILLERI, MD, AND CYNTHIA STANISLAV, BS Doctors and investigators at Mayo Clinic have traditionally embraced the study of the history of medicine, a history that is chronicled in the stained glass window at Mayo Foundation House. Soon after the donation of the Mayo family home in Rochester, Minnesota, to the Mayo Foundation in 1938, a committee that included Philip Showalter Hench, MD, (who became a Nobel Prize winner in 1950); C.F. Code, MD; and Henry Frederic Helmholz, Jr., MD, sub- mitted recommendations for a stained glass window dedicated to the history of medicine. The window, installed in 1943, is vertically organized to represent three “shields” from left to right—education, practice and research—over four epochs, starting from the bot- tom with the earliest (pre-1500) and ending with the most recent (post-1900) periods. These eras represent ancient and medieval medicine, the movement from theories to experimentation, organized advancement in science and, finally, the era of preventive medicine. The luminaries, their contributions to science and medicine and the famous quotes or aphorisms included in the panels of the stained glass window are summa- rized. Among the famous personalities shown are Hippocrates of Kos, Galen, Andreas Vesalius, Ambroise Paré, William Harvey, Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Giovanni Battista Morgagni, William Withering, Edward Jenner, René Laennec, Claude Bernard, Florence Nightingale, Louis Pasteur, Joseph Lister, Theodor Billroth, Robert Koch, William Osler, Willem Einthoven and Paul Ehrlich.
    [Show full text]
  • Medicine in the Renaissance the Renaissance Was a Period of Many
    Medicine in the Renaissance The Renaissance was a period of many discoveries and new ideas. Students need to be able to establish whether these discoveries led to improvements in the way that people were treated. Did the ideas of medical greats such as Vesalius, Harvey and Pare result in immediate, gradual or no improvements? William Harvey William Harvey became Royal Physician to James I and Charles I. He was a leading member of the Royal College of Surgeons and trained at the famous university in Padua, Italy. Harvey's contribution to medical knowledge was great but the impact of his work was not immediate. In 1615 he conducted a comparative study on animals and humans. He realised that many of his findings on animals could be applied to Humans. Through this study he was able to prove that Galen had been wrong to suggest that blood is constantly being consumed. Instead, he argued, correctly, that blood was constantly pumped around the body by the heart. Harvey went on to identify the difference between arteries and veins and noted that blood changes colour as it passes through the lungs. Harvey also identified the way in which valves work in veins and arteries to regulate the circulation of blood. An ilustration of William Harvey's findings. Source - wikimedia. Andreas Vesalius Vesalius was born into a medical family and was encouraged from an early age to read about medical ideas and practice. He went to Louvain University from 1528 to 1533 when he moved to Paris. Vesalius returned to Louvain in 1536 because of war in France.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Vesalius, the Predecessor of Neurosurgery: How His Progressive
    Historical Vignette Andreas Vesalius, the Predecessor of Neurosurgery: How his Progressive Scientific Achievements Affected his Professional Life and Destiny Bruno Splavski1-3, Kresimir Rotim1,2, Goran Lakicevi c4, Andrew J. Gienapp5,6, Frederick A. Boop5-7, Kenan I. Arnautovic6,7 Key words Andreas Vesalius, the father of modern anatomy and a predecessor of neuro- - 16th Century science, was a distinguished medical scholar and Renaissance figure of the 16th - Anatomy - Andreas Vesalius Century Scientific Revolution. He challenged traditional anatomy by applying - Death empirical methods of cadaveric dissection to the study of the human body. His - Neuroscience revolutionary book, De Humani Corporis Fabrica, established anatomy as a - Pilgrimage scientific discipline that challenged conventional medical knowledge, but often From the 1Department of Neurosurgery, Sestre Milosrdnice caused controversy. Charles V, the Holy Roman Emperor and King of Spain to University Hospital Center, Zagreb, Croatia; 2Osijek whom De Humani was dedicated, appointed Vesalius to his court. While in 3 University School of Medicine, Osijek, Croatia; Osijek Spain, Vesalius’ work antagonized the academic establishment, current medical University School of Dental Medicine and Health, Osijek, Croatia; 4Mostar University Hospital, Mostar, Bosnia and knowledge, and ecclesial authority. Consequently, his methods were unac- Herzegovina; 5Neuroscience Institute, Le Bonheur Children’s ceptable to the academic and religious status quo, therefore, we believe that his 6 Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; Semmes-Murphey professional life—as well as his tragic death—was affected by the political Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, USA; and 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tennessee Health Science state of affairs that dominated 16th Century Europe. Ultimately, he went on a Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA pilgrimage to the Holy Land that jeopardized his life.
    [Show full text]
  • Andreas Vesalius O F Brussels Holds
    A N D R E A S V ES AL I US TH REFO RMER O F ANATO M Y M S OO B LL . JA E M RES A , M D . SAINT LO UIS MEDICAL SCIENCE PRESS MDCCCCX TO THE MEM O RY OF THOSE I LLUSTRIOUS MEN WH O OFTEN U N DER A DVE RSE CIRCUMSTAN CES AND SOMETIMES I N DANG E R O F DEATH SUCC EEDED I N UNRAV EL L I NG THE MYSTERIES OF THE STRUCTURE O F THE HUM AN BODY TO THE FATHERS O F ANATO MY AND TO THE A RTIST - ANATOMISTS THIS BO OK IS DEDI CATED PREFAC E N T H E A N NA L S O F TH E medical profession the name of Andreas Vesalius o f Brussels holds a place second to none . Every him physician has heard of , yet few know the details of his life , the circumstances under which his labors were carried out , the o f extent those labors , or their far o f m reaching influence upon the progress anato y , physi m ology and surgery . Co paratively few physicians have m seen his works ; and fewer still have read the . The m m refor ation which he inaugurated in anato y , and inci o f m dentally in other branches edical science , has left im m m o f only a d i press upon the inds the busy , science loving physicians o f the nineteenth and twentieth centuries . That so little should be known about him is not surpris ing , since his writings were in Latin and were published m o f .
    [Show full text]
  • Progressive Reactionary: the Life and Works of John Caius, Md
    PROGRESSIVE REACTIONARY: THE LIFE AND WORKS OF JOHN CAIUS, MD by Dannielle Marie Cagliuso Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Kenneth P. Dietrich School of Arts and Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2015 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH KENNETH P. DIETRICH SCHOOL OF ARTS AND SCIENCES This thesis was presented by Dannielle Marie Cagliuso It was defended on July 20, 2015 and approved by Dr. Peter Distelzweig, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy (University of St. Thomas) Dr. Emily Winerock, Visiting Assistant Professor, Department of History Dr. Janelle Greenberg, Professor, Department of History Thesis Director: Dr. James G. Lennox, Professor and Chair, Department of History and Philosophy of Science ii Copyright © by Dannielle Marie Cagliuso 2015 iii PROGRESSIVE REACTIONARY: THE LIFE AND WORKS OF JOHN CAIUS, MD Dannielle Marie Cagliuso, BPhil University of Pittsburgh, 2015 The picture of Dr. John Caius (1510-1573) is fraught with contradictions. Though he had an excellent reputation among his contemporaries, subsequent scholars tend to view him more critically. Caius is frequently condemned as a reactionary and compared unfavorably to his more “progressive” contemporaries, like Conrad Gesner and Andreas Vesalius. This approach to Caius is an example of what I term “progressivist history,” a prevalent but problematic trend in historical scholarship. Progressivist history applies a progressive-reactionary dichotomy to the past, splitting people and events into two discrete camps. By exploring the life and works of John Caius and comparing him to some of his “progressive” contemporaries, I reveal why this dichotomy is problematic. It treats both the progressive “heroes” and reactionary “villains” unfairly in that it fails to appreciate the agency of each individual and the nuanced differences between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Clendening Lectures on the History and Philosophy of Medicine
    Logan Clendening Lectures on the History and Philosophy of Medicine First Series by John Farquhar Fulton Logan Clendening Lectures on the History and Philosophy of Medicine First Series Logan Clendening (18844945) Logan Clendening Lectures on the History and Philosophy of Medicine First Series: i Vesalius Four Centuries Later ii Medicine in the Eighteenth Century by John Farquhar Fulton Sterling Professor of Physiology and Keeper of Medical History Collections, Yale University University of Kansas Press, Lawrence, Kansas - - 1950 COPYRIGHT, 1950, BY THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PRESS ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PRINTED IN THE U.S.A. BY THE UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS PRESS LAWRENCE, KANSAS Prefatory Note In 1949 Mrs. Logan Clendening presented to the School of Medicine of the University of Kansas a sum of money to establish a lectureship on the history and philosophy of medicine in memory of her husband, the late Dr. Logan Clendening. The initial series of lectures was given on November 15, 1949, by Dr. John Farquhar Fulton, M.D., Ph.D., D.Sc, LL.D., Sterling Professor of Physiology and Keeper of Medical History Collections in Yale University. Contents I VESALIUS FOUR CENTURIES LATER ... 3 II MEDICINE IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY . 25 INDEX 51 I Vesalius Four Centuries Later Vesalius Four Centuries Later* I deem it a great honor to be invited to inaugurate the Logan Clendening Lectureship on the History and Phil• osophy of Medicine established in memory of Dr. Clen• dening, for he was an old and a valued friend and, as a book collector, an energetic and, I might add, most dev• astating rival.
    [Show full text]
  • Bill Nye - Biography, Facts and Pictures
    5/9/2016 Bill Nye - Biography, Facts and Pictures Home List of Scientists Blog Bill Nye Search Famous Scientists SEARCH Scientist of the Week André Marie Ampère: Founded electromagnetic theory Recent Scientists of the Week Jane Goodall: Discoveries in chimpanzee behavior James Hutton: Founded modern geology Harold Urey: Deuterium and the building blocks of life Andreas Vesalius: Founded modern anatomy Niels Bohr: Quantum mechanics & the atom Barbara McClintock: Jumping genes & crossing chromosomes Francis Bacon: The Scientific Method “The Science Guy.” William Sanford Nye who goes by his more popular moniker Anaximander: An ancient scientific revolution Bill Nye is a science educator who began his career in science as one of Boeing’s mechanical engineers. He is most popularly known as Bill Nye the Science Guy Heinrich Hertz: Discovered radio waves and photoelectric effect where he hosts the Disney/PBS science show for children. Bill Nye is also a Charles Darwin: Evolution by natural selection comedian, actor, scientist, and a writer. He has gained popularity for his many Robert Boyle: The birth of chemistry appearances in today’s media as a fun to watch science educator. Srinivasa Ramanujan: The purest mathematics Ernest Lawrence: Invented the cyclotron; founder of big science Early Life and Education Rudolf Virchow: Discovered diseases strike by attacking cells Irene Joliot­Curie: The first artificial radioactive elements Hans Christian Oersted: Discovered electromagnetism Bill Nye was born in November 27, 1955. His mother was a codebreaker named Jack Horner: New horizons in dinosaur research Jacqueline, and his World War II veteran father was named Edwin Darby. His father had experienced being a prisoner of Japanese war camps, and this made Ronald Fisher: Statistician; and greatest biologist since Darwin? him an enthusiast of sundials.
    [Show full text]
  • Lebenskraft, Radical Reality, and Occidental Medicine: How Science Is Leading Us Back to a Holistic View
    Lebenskraft, Radical Reality, and Occidental Medicine: How Science is Leading us back to a Holistic View Monica Ledoux Abstract: Analyzing a human being through her/his constituent parts, physiology has led to significant breakthroughs in research. However, this approach is reaching its limits as one becomes ever more aware that essential holistic factors such as multicausal illnesses, the importance of the microbiome, and psychological factors are not addressed. A holis- tic approach to medicine reemerged in the nineteenth century under different guises, such as homeopathy, and with varying degrees of scientific grounding. More recent initia- tives, such as translational microbiome research, multidisciplinary consultations and a new focus on patient/doctor communication, are now gaining momentum, boosted by new scientific discoveries. It is likely that a more holistic approach to studies of human well being in twenty-first century medicine will offer opportunities for better understand- ing how the body responds to its environment.1 The Focus on Anatomy In Renaissance Europe Andreas Vesalius (1514-1564), a professor at the University of Padua, became convinced that autopsy was a necessary exer- cise for the genuine understanding of human anatomy. He considered em- pirical, direct observation to be the only reliable method of investigation, which represented a dramatic break with previous medical practice. His dis- secting of cadavers introduced a period of rapid advances in knowledge of the anatomy and development of surgical procedures. The introduction of the microscope in laboratory techniques in 1674 by Anton van Leeuwen- hoek (1632-1723) allowed for enhanced knowledge of ever-smaller struc- tures such as blood corpuscles, lymph cells, nerve cells, and bacteria.
    [Show full text]
  • 91 on Page 91 of His Brilliant Book, Domenico Bertoloni Meli Presents
    _full_journalsubtitle: A Journal for the Study of Science, Technology and Medicine in the Pre-modern Period _full_abbrevjournaltitle: ESM _full_ppubnumber: ISSN 1383-7427 (print version) _full_epubnumber: ISSN 1573-3823 (online version) _full_issue: 1 _full_issuetitle: The Body Politic from Medieval Lombardy to the Dutch Republic _full_alt_author_running_head (neem stramien J2 voor dit article en vul alleen 0 in hierna): Book Reviews _full_alt_articletitle_running_head (rechter kopregel - mag alles zijn): Book Reviews _full_is_advance_article: 0 _full_article_language: en indien anders: engelse articletitle: 0 Early Science and Medicine 25 (2020) 91-93 Book Reviews 91 Domenico Bertoloni Meli (2019), Mechanism: A Visual, Lexical, and Conceptual History (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press), pp. xii + 188, illus., $45.00 (hardcover), ISBN 978 0 8229 4547 5. On page 91 of his brilliant book, Domenico Bertoloni Meli presents Robert Hooke’s investigation of the striking phenomenon of the beard of wild oats as an example of the latter’s attempt to tie together natural and artificial devices: not only could plants be mechanized and explained through mechanical in- struments, but “Hooke was [also] inspired by this mechanism occurring in na- ture to construct a hybrid device to measure humidity” (pp. 91-92). By contrast, several years after the publication of Hooke’s Micrographia, with its explana- tions of the wild oat or the sensitive herb, Leibniz continued questioning the possibility of mechanizing plants insofar as these have no motion. In fact, within the all-pervasive paradigm of the mechanical philosophy, early modern attempts at mechanizing all natural phenomena appear to have been much more contested and problematic than one might have expected.
    [Show full text]
  • Texts and Documents Malpighi's De Polypo Cordis: an Annotated
    Medical History, 1995, 39: 477-492 Texts and Documents Malpighi's De Polypo Cordis: An Annotated Translation JOHN M FORRESTER* Introduction Malpighi's De polypo cordis (1666) represents a significant contribution to the understanding of blood, its composition and its clotting. In this work, written during his occupation of the primary Chair of Medicine at Messina (1662-66),l he recognized, albeit dimly, fibrinogen as a regular component of blood, and began to investigate the conditions which provoke or prevent clotting, either intravascularly or in shed blood. His microscopes had enabled him to discover the pulmonary capillaries five years earlier. Now he provided the first precise description, aided by microscopy, of the laminar structure of a clot and the sequence of its formation. He specified how the appearance of post-mortem clot in the left and right sides of the heart differed. Here too it can be claimed that the first sighting of red blood cells is recorded, although Malpighi was at the time far from appreciating their significance. Preceding Work The term "Polypus cordis" was first used by the audience of leading physicians of Amsterdam, at an autopsy by Nicolaas Tulp.2 Then in 1654 Pissinius published the first *Dr John M Forrester MA, BM, BCh, 120 he died from cerebral haemorrhage; see Phil. Trans. Morningside Drive, Edinburgh EHIO 5NS. Roy. Soc., 1697, 19, no. 226: 467-71. 2 I am much indebted to Professor Vivian Nutton for Nicolaas Tulp (1593-1674) was Praelector in his vigilant scrutiny of the translation, and to Dr Anatomy at Amsterdam, 1628-1652.
    [Show full text]
  • Possibly an Authentic Likeness As It Dates from Vesalius' N
    A portrait of Vesalius. This is possibly an authentic likeness as it dates from Vesalius' N. Wright. 1965. VESALIUS AND THE RE -BIRTH OF ANATOMY. 1-(a:0 1. 1. Vesalius and the Re -Birth of Anatomy. Preamble. This essay falls naturally into three harts: pre - Vesalian anatomy, the life and work of Vesalius, and the impact of his ideas on his contemporaries and on anatomists after him. In the section dealing with pre -Vesalian anatomy I shall limit myself as much as possible to those aspects of anatomy which have the greatest bearing on Vesalius' work. As the title of the essay includes "Re -birth of Anatomy" I will attempt to outline the spread of Vesalius' ideas, how they were received, and indicate how they moulded the thinking of future generations. PART I Pre- Vesalian Anatomy. 1. Anatomy before Galen. The basis of human anatomy is, of course, dissection of the human body. The possibility of progress in the study of anatomy is dependent on the cultural level of society and also on the degree of releigious sophistication attained by that society. Only in highly developed cultures has 2. anatomy become permissible. Almaeon of Crotona ( 500 B.C.) probably dissected goats. Plato, from his writings in the Timaeus, obviously had no anatomical knowledge. His thought was always of influence, particularly in the Middle Ages until the Aristotelian revolution. The early Hippocratic writings, especially on fractures and dislocations, betray a slight anatomical knowledge, possibly picked up from practical surgery. Diocles practised in Athens around the middle of the fourth pre -Christian century.
    [Show full text]