DOCSLIB.ORG

Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service HUC 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: 0315010410 Etowah River-Lake Allatoona HUC 8 Watershed: Etowah Counties: Bartow, Cherokee Major Waterbodies (in GA): Etowah River, Stamp Creek, McKaskey Creek, Boston Creek, Carter Creek, Allatoona Lake, Vaughn Lake Federal Listed Species: (historic, known occurrence, or likely to occur in the watershed) E - Endangered, T - Threatened, C - Candidate, CCA - Candidate Conservation species, PE - Proposed Endangered, PT - Proposed Threatened, Pet - Petitioned, R - Rare, U - Uncommon, SC - Species of Concern. Etowah Darter (Etheostoma etowahae) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: 1 May - 30 Nov (only when water temperatures are above 10°C). Cherokee Darter (Etheostoma scotti) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: 1 May - 30 Nov (only when water temperatures are above 10°C). Amber Darter (Percina antesella) US: E; GA: E Floodplain; Survey period: year-round. Finelined Pocketbook (Hamiota altilis) US: T; GA: T Potential Range (watershed); Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Gray Bat (Myotis grisescens) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis septentrionalis) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; habitat model; Survey period: 15 May - 15 Aug. Monkeyface Orchid (Platanthera integrilabia) US: T; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: flowering 15 Jul - 31 Aug. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010410 Etowah River-Lake Allatoona 1 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report Large-flowered Skullcap (Scutellaria montana) US: T; GA: T HUC 10 Watershed: Potential Range (county); Survey period: mid May - early Jun. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. Tennessee Yellow-eyed Grass (Xyris tennesseensis) US: E; GA: E Occurrence; Survey period: 1 Aug - 30 Sep. Federal Candidate, Candidate Conservation, or Petitioned Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Alabama Rainbow (Villosa nebulosa) US: Pet Occurrence; Survey period: year round, when water temperatures are above 10° C and excluding when stage is increasing or above normal. Georgia Aster (Symphyotrichum georgianum) US: CCA; GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: flowering early Sep - early Nov. Use of a nearby reference site to more accurately determine local flowering period is recommended. State Listed or Other At-risk Species: (likely or known to occur in the watershed) Etowah Crayfish (Cambarus fasciatus) GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: 01 May - 30 Nov. Rock Darter (Etheostoma rupestre) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Lined Chub (Hybopsis lineapunctata) GA: R Historic Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) GA: T Occurrence; Survey period: year-round. Pink Ladyslipper (Cypripedium acaule) GA: U Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Indian Olive (Nestronia umbellula) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Cumberland Rose Gentian (Sabatia capitata) GA: R Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Bay Star-vine (Schisandra glabra) GA: T Occurrence; Please consult with GDNR for survey efforts. Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010410 Etowah River-Lake Allatoona 2 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report Any of the above species may occur in suitable habitat in this HUC 10 watershed. Survey dates are provided for reference only. HUCPlease 10 coordinate Watershed with: your lead federal agency, Georgia Department of Natural Resources, or USFWS to determine if surveys will help assess project impacts to species of concern. Watershed Specific Concerns: There are federally listed aquatic/wetland and terrestrial species that occur or could occur in this watershed. If the project contains suitable habitat for listed species, please contact your lead federal agency to determine the appropriate next step for those species to inform their NEPA and ESA decisions. Coordination with Georgia Department of Natural Resources may also be helpful in those decisions. Bats/Caves: If your project will directly or indirectly affect hardwood forests, please conduct bat habitat assessments to determine the level of consultation necessary with our agency, in addition to developing appropriate avoidance and minimization measures, if appropriate. We recommend that any tree clearing of forests appropriate for Indiana and/or Northern Long-eared Bats occur outside of the non-volant period (May 15-July 31) to reduce potential impacts when pups are not capable of flight. Cave or cave-like habitats could represent maternity roosts for Gray Bats or hibernacula for Gray or Northern Long-eared Bats. Bald Eagle: Bald Eagles and their nests are protected from take, including disturbance, under the federal Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. For information about Bald and Golden Eagles see the Service's regional web page: https://www.fws. gov/southeast/our-services/permits/eagles/ Aquatics: Several federally or state-listed aquatic species occur in the Etowah River HUC 8 watershed. These species are sensitive to sedimentation and changes in water quality. Please use guidance found in the Riparian Buffer, Streambank, and Stream Channel Protection and Water Quality Protection sections below. Please coordinate any avoidance and minimization efforts for the federally listed species with our office. Because of a high level of past survey effort in the watershed, surveys for aquatic species may not be necessary for federally listed species. Please coordinate with our office prior to conducting surveys for any of these species and in accordance with your Section 10(A)(1)(a) permit. Trout Stream: This watershed contains streams designated as Primary or Secondary Trout Streams by the State of Georgia. These streams support native and introduced trout populations. Maintenance of cold water temperatures, preservation of vegetated stream buffers, and strict sediment and erosion control are critical for these streams. Monkeyface Orchid: This orchid occurs in seeps, springheads, seepy streambanks, or other swampy habitats. Many of the orchid species are highly sought after for ornamental or gardening purposes. Protecting locations of populations of Monkeyface Orchid is important to the recovery of this species. Avoidance of ditching, draining, or filling can help protect the hydrology of orchid habitats. Large-flowered Skullcap: This watershed is within the potential range of Large-flowered Skullcap. This species occurs in hardwood or mix-hardwood forests with a relatively open understory. Any activities in the vicinity of skullcap populations should minimize disturbances that would promote invasive species. Georgia Aster: There are known occurrences of candidate conservation species Georgia Aster in this watershed. Georgia Aster can be found in open forests or forest edges and right-of-ways. For the protection in areas where this species occur, use prescribed fire or mowing in winter or early spring to create or maintain sunny openings. Avoid use of herbicides. Avoid clear- cutting and soil disturbance. Tennessee Yellow-Eyed Grass: This grass species is native to springs, edges of shallow streams, seeps and similar wetland habitats. Activities near populations of this species that are protective of hydrology (limit filling, draining, and other activities) and minimize impacts to water quality and condition of habitat this species may assist with recovery efforts. Priority Watershed: This watershed has been identified as a moderately significant high priority watershed for aquatic species. This indicates that the watershed contains important populations of high priority aquatic species or is an important watershed for aquatic organisms. For more information, please see the following fact sheet: https://www.fws.gov/athens/transportation/pdfs/SWAP_Priority_Watershed_fact_sheet_2017.pdf Updated: 2/9/2021 0315010410 Etowah River-Lake Allatoona 3 Georgia Ecological Services U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 2/9/2021 HUC 10 Watershed Report HUC 10 Watershed: Species and Habitat Concerns Bridges / Culverts / Structures: Bridges, culverts, and structures (barns, buildings, etc.) can be used by migratory bird species for nesting and roosting and by federally listed and sensitive bat species for roosting. To comply with the national programmatic agreement between FHWA, FRA, and FWS and to ​assess ​risk and ​potential impacts to ​ species protected​ ​under ​the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. § 1531 et seq.), or state protected bat species, inspections of all bridges, culverts, and structures will help determine if there is evidence of roosting bats. If an inspection is conducted, please use the "Georgia Bats in Bridges" phone app to submit the data online to GA and provide a copy of the datasheet with any report to the lead federal agency. The app may be downloaded for free for iPhone (https://apps.apple.com/us/app/georgia-bats-in-bridges/id1376788714) or Android phones. If you are unable to utilize the app, a digital version of the datasheet is available at https://ee.kobotoolbox. org/x/#YVhJ. Please follow any previous coordination with the Service and/or Georgia Department of Natural Resources related to activities that may impact roosting bats or nesting migratory birds. Erosion Control Netting: Monofilament or plastic
Recommended publications
  • Chattahoochee River Pedestrian Bridge: Environmental Assessment

    Chattahoochee River Pedestrian Bridge: Environmental Assessment

    Project No: NA Fulton County P.I. Number 0009640 State Route (SR) 9 at Chattahoochee River in Roswell - Enhancements ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION AND GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUBMITTED PURSUANT TO 42 USC 4321 et. seq. And 49 USC 303 (for 4(f), if applicable) May 20, 2020 NEPA DATE Eric Duff DATEDAT State Environmental Administrator APPROVAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND ADVANCEMENT TO AVAILABILITY/PUBLIC HEARING PHASE Digitally signed by JENNIFER L JENNIFER L GIERSCH GIERSCH Date: 2020.06.24 11:59:12 -04'00' DATE FOR: MOISES MARRERO DIVISION ADMINISTRATOR FEDERAL HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION ǣ͝Ȁ͚͞Ȁ͚͚͘͘ȁǣ ͗ǣ͘͘͘͘͜͡͞ǡǣ ȋ Ȍǣ͝Ȁ͙͙Ȁ͚͙͘͠ 7KHHQJLQHHURIUHFRUG (25 DVVHUWVWKDW ȀǣǤǤ͝Ȁ͚͟Ȁ͚͚͘͘ ǣǤǤ͝Ȁ͚͟Ȁ͚͚͘͘ SODQVLQFRUSRUDWHRUZLOOLQFRUSRUDWHFRPPLWPHQWV 7KH*'27SURMHFWPDQDJHU 30 DVVHUWVWKDW ǣ Ǥ Ǥ͝Ȁ͚͟Ȁ͚͚͘͘ ǣ͝Ȁ͚͞Ȁ͚͚͘͘ WKHVHFRPPLWPHQWVDUHIHDVLEOH LIDSSOLFDEOH ǡ *'2730(ND2NRQPNSDHWRB 6LJQDWXUH'DWH(NDNSDHWR Ǥ (25BBB BBB ǣ͝Ȁ͚͟Ȁ͚͚͘͘ 6LJQDWXUH'DWH Ǥ Ȁ ȋ Ȍ ǫ Ǧ͙ ȋȌ͙ Ǧ ͚͚͘͘ Ǧ Ǧ͚ ͙ Ǧ͜ Dz Dz Dz ͚͘ȋ͘Ǥ͚͘͘ Ȍ Ǧ͛ ͚ ͠͠ȋ͘Ǥ͚͜͜ Ȍ Ǧ͙ǡǦ͙ǡǦ͚ Dz Dz Dz ͙͘͘ Ǧ͜ ͚ Ǧ Dz Dz Dz ͘Ǥ͙͛ ǡ ǡ Ǧ͝ ȋȌ͜ Ǧ͙ǡǦ͙ǡǦ͛ Dz Dz Dz Ǧ͞ Ǧ͙ Dz Dz ͟ǡ Ǧ͟ ͙ Ǧ Dz ͚͙͛͘ ͙͞ǡ Ǧ͠ ǦǦ Dz ͚͙͘͡ Ǥ ȋ ǡȌ Ǥ ǯ Ǧ͙ ͙͘͟Ǥ͚͛Ǥ ͡Ȁ͙͡Ȁ͚͙͘͞ Ǥ ȋ ǣ ǡ Ȍ Ǥ ǫ Ǥ Ǧ͙ ǡ Ǥ ͙͜ ǡ Ǥ ǣ͝Ȁ͚͞Ȁ͚͚͘͘ȁǣ ͗ǣ͘͘͘͘͜͡͞ǡǣ ȋ Ȍǣ͝Ȁ͙͙Ȁ͚͙͘͠ Ǥ ǡ ǡ ǡ Ǥ ǯ ȋǡ ǡ ǥȌ Ǥ ǫ Ȃ Ǧ͙ ͙͘͜͜͜ ͚͜ ͚͚͙͘ ͙͚͙͙͘͘͠͠ǡ͚͡͞ Ȃ Ǧ͚ ͙͆͜ǡ͚͜͟ ͙͙͛͛͘͘͘͘ ͚͚͙͘ ͘Ǥ͙͚͙͘͘͘͠Ǥ͘͠ Ȃ Ǧ͛ ͆͠͞ǡ͘͘͘ ͙͙͛͛͘͘͘͘ ͚͚͙͘ Ȃ Ǧ͜ Ǧ ͙ ͚͚͙͘ Ǧ͝ ȋ Ȍ Dz Ǥ Ǧ͞ Dz Ǥ ȋǣǦȂ ǢȂǯȌ Ǧǡǡ Ǥ ȋǤǤȀ ȀȀǤȌ Ǧ͙ ȋǤǤȌ ̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸ ͛͘Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧ͚ Ǧǡ ǡ Dz ǡǡǤ ̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸̸ ͛͘ Ǥ Ǧ Ǥ Ǧǡ ǡ ͟ Ǧ͛ Ǧ Dz ǡǡǤ to advertising for opportunity to hold a Public Hearing Open House.
  • Fish Consumption Guidelines: Rivers & Creeks

    Fish Consumption Guidelines: Rivers & Creeks

    FRESHWATER FISH CONSUMPTION GUIDELINES: RIVERS & CREEKS NO RESTRICTIONS ONE MEAL PER WEEK ONE MEAL PER MONTH DO NOT EAT NO DATA Bass, LargemouthBass, Other Bass, Shoal Bass, Spotted Bass, Striped Bass, White Bass, Bluegill Bowfin Buffalo Bullhead Carp Catfish, Blue Catfish, Channel Catfish,Flathead Catfish, White Crappie StripedMullet, Perch, Yellow Chain Pickerel, Redbreast Redhorse Redear Sucker Green Sunfish, Sunfish, Other Brown Trout, Rainbow Trout, Alapaha River Alapahoochee River Allatoona Crk. (Cobb Co.) Altamaha River Altamaha River (below US Route 25) Apalachee River Beaver Crk. (Taylor Co.) Brier Crk. (Burke Co.) Canoochee River (Hwy 192 to Ogeechee River) Chattahoochee River (Helen to Lk. Lanier) (Buford Dam to Morgan Falls Dam) (Morgan Falls Dam to Peachtree Crk.) * (Peachtree Crk. to Pea Crk.) * (Pea Crk. to West Point Lk., below Franklin) * (West Point dam to I-85) (Oliver Dam to Upatoi Crk.) Chattooga River (NE Georgia, Rabun County) Chestatee River (below Tesnatee Riv.) Conasauga River (below Stateline) Coosa River (River Mile Zero to Hwy 100, Floyd Co.) Coosa River <32" (Hwy 100 to Stateline, Floyd Co.) >32" Coosa River (Coosa, Etowah below Thompson-Weinman dam, Oostanaula) Coosawattee River (below Carters) Etowah River (Dawson Co.) Etowah River (above Lake Allatoona) Etowah River (below Lake Allatoona dam) Flint River (Spalding/Fayette Cos.) Flint River (Meriwether/Upson/Pike Cos.) Flint River (Taylor Co.) Flint River (Macon/Dooly/Worth/Lee Cos.) <16" Flint River (Dougherty/Baker Mitchell Cos.) 16–30" >30" Gum Crk. (Crisp Co.) Holly Crk. (Murray Co.) Ichawaynochaway Crk. Kinchafoonee Crk. (above Albany) Little River (above Clarks Hill Lake) Little River (above Ga. Hwy 133, Valdosta) Mill Crk.
  • Cobb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas

    Cobb County, Georgia and Incorporated Areas

    VOLUME 1 OF 4 Cobb County COBB COUNTY, GEORGIA AND INCORPORATED AREAS COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ACWORTH, CITY OF 130053 AUSTELL, CITY OF 130054 COBB COUNTY 130052 (UNINCORPORATED AREAS) KENNESAW, CITY OF 130055 MARIETTA, CITY OF 130226 POWDER SPRINGS, CITY OF 130056 SMYRNA, CITY OF 130057 REVISED: MARCH 4, 2013 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 13067CV001D NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) report may not contain all data available within the Community Map Repository. Please contact the Community Map Repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS report. Therefore, users should consult with community officials and check the Community Map Repository to obtain the most current FIS report components. Initial Countywide FIS Effective Date: August 18, 1992 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: December 16, 2008 Revised Countywide FIS Effective Date: March 4, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose of Study 1 1.2 Authority and Acknowledgments 1 1.3 Coordination 3 2.0 AREA STUDIED 5 2.1 Scope of Study 5 2.2 Community Description 10 2.3 Principal Flood Problems
  • List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin

    List of TMDL Implementation Plans with Tmdls Organized by Basin

    Latest 305(b)/303(d) List of Streams List of Stream Reaches With TMDLs and TMDL Implementation Plans - Updated June 2011 Total Maximum Daily Loadings TMDL TMDL PLAN DELIST BASIN NAME HUC10 REACH NAME LOCATION VIOLATIONS TMDL YEAR TMDL PLAN YEAR YEAR Altamaha 0307010601 Bullard Creek ~0.25 mi u/s Altamaha Road to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Cobb Creek Oconee Creek to Altamaha River FC 2012 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 2006 Altamaha 0307010601 Milligan Creek Uvalda to Altamaha River FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010601 Oconee Creek Headwaters to Cobb Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010602 Ten Mile Creek Little Ten Mile Creek to Altamaha River DO TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Beards Creek Spring Branch to Altamaha River Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010603 Five Mile Creek Headwaters to Altamaha River Bio(sediment) TMDL 2007 09/30/2009 Altamaha 0307010603 Goose Creek U/S Rd. S1922(Walton Griffis Rd.) to Little Goose Creek FC TMDL 2001 TMDL PLAN 08/31/2003 Altamaha 0307010603 Mushmelon Creek Headwaters to Delbos Bay Bio F 2012 Altamaha 0307010604 Altamaha River Confluence of Oconee and Ocmulgee Rivers to ITT Rayonier
  • Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards

    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Rule 391-3-6-.03. Water Use Classifications and Water Quality Standards ( 1) Purpose. The establishment of water quality standards. (2) W ate r Quality Enhancement: (a) The purposes and intent of the State in establishing Water Quality Standards are to provide enhancement of water quality and prevention of pollution; to protect the public health or welfare in accordance with the public interest for drinking water supplies, conservation of fish, wildlife and other beneficial aquatic life, and agricultural, industrial, recreational, and other reasonable and necessary uses and to maintain and improve the biological integrity of the waters of the State. ( b) The following paragraphs describe the three tiers of the State's waters. (i) Tier 1 - Existing instream water uses and the level of water quality necessary to protect the existing uses shall be maintained and protected. (ii) Tier 2 - Where the quality of the waters exceed levels necessary to support propagation of fish, shellfish, and wildlife and recreation in and on the water, that quality shall be maintained and protected unless the division finds, after full satisfaction of the intergovernmental coordination and public participation provisions of the division's continuing planning process, that allowing lower water quality is necessary to accommodate important economic or social development in the area in which the waters are located.
  • Antioxidant Effects of Schisandra Chinensis Fruits and Their Active Constituents

    Antioxidant Effects of Schisandra Chinensis Fruits and Their Active Constituents

    antioxidants Review Antioxidant Effects of Schisandra chinensis Fruits and Their Active Constituents Dalia M. Kopustinskiene 1 and Jurga Bernatoniene 1,2,* 1 Institute of Pharmaceutical Technologies, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukileliu pr. 13, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania; [email protected] 2 Department of Drug Technology and Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Sukileliu pr. 13, LT-50161 Kaunas, Lithuania * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Schisandra chinensis Turcz. (Baill.) fruits, their extracts, and bioactive compounds are used in alternative medicine as adaptogens and ergogens protecting against numerous neurological, cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, liver, and skin disorders. S. chinensis fruit extracts and their active compounds are potent antioxidants and mitoprotectors exerting anti-inflammatory, antiviral, anti- cancer, and anti-aging effects. S. chinensis polyphenolic compounds—flavonoids, phenolic acids and the major constituents dibenzocyclooctadiene lignans are responsible for the S. chinensis antioxidant activities. This review will focus on the direct and indirect antioxidant effects of S. chinensis fruit extract and its bioactive compounds in the cells during normal and pathological conditions. Keywords: Schisandra chinensis; lignan; schisandrin B; antioxidant; pro-oxidant; mitochondria Citation: Kopustinskiene, D.M.; 1. Introduction Bernatoniene, J. Antioxidant Effects Schisandra chinensis Turcz. (Baill.) belongs to the Schisandraceae family. The plants of Schisandra chinensis Fruits and are native to northeastern China, Japan, Korea, Manchuria, and the Far East part of Russia. Their Active Constituents. Their purple-red berries are called five-flavor fruits because of the sweet, bitter, pungent, Antioxidants 2021, 10, 620. https:// salty, and sour taste [1–5]. S.
  • River Clean-Up Guru, Bobby Marie…

    River Clean-Up Guru, Bobby Marie…

    River Clean-Up Guru, Bobby Marie… 1/11/2012 - Chattahoochee River 1/14/2012 – Etowah River 1/14/2012 – Coosa River 1/14/2012 – Oostanaula River 2/8/2012 – Peachtree Creek, South Fork 2/15/2012 – Peachtree Creek, North Fork 2/29/2012 – Suwannee River 4/21/2012 – Little River 5/16/2012 – Nickajack Creek 6/17/2012 – Altamaha River 8/8/2012 – Amicalola Creek 9/8/2012 – South River To view more 12 in 2012 finishers, go here. 1/11/2012 – Chattahoochee River Good Morning, I and two others paddled upstream on the Chattahoochee from Jones Bridge for about 4 miles then back down on a cold January afternoon on the 11th. It rained on us a couple of times, but the paddling kept us warm. We passed empty golf courses and leafless trees. We did see several herons and a couple of raptors hunting the river. Bobby Marie 1/14/2012 – Etowah, Coosa, Oostanala Rivers On January 14th, I joined Joe Cook and about 100 others on the CRBI Polar Bear Paddle over by Rome, GA. In one day I paddled 3 rivers, the Etowah for the major portion of the trip, then took two side paddles, upstream on the Oostanala for 30 minutes and then down and back up the Coosa for 30 minutes. When you reach the confluence of these three rivers you can look down and see the difference in the waters. The Etowah was greenish and the Oostanala was very brown and the Coosa was a mixture of the two! I only saw one BIG cooter on the bank in the sun the whole day.
  • Study on the Modern Application of Schisandra Chinensis

    Study on the Modern Application of Schisandra Chinensis

    2017 International Conference on Medical Science and Human Health (MSHH 2017) ISBN: 978-1-60595-472-1 Study on the Modern Application of Schisandra Chinensis Ya-Juan WENa, Xiao-Yan FANG, Ming BAI and Ming-San MIAOb,* Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, 450006, China [email protected], [email protected] *Corresponding author Keywords: Schisandra Chinensis, Chemical Constituents, Pharmacological Action, Clinical Application. Dietotherapy Application. Abstract. This paper analyzes the chemical, pharmacological and application characteristics of Schisandra chinensis, and provides a way for comprehensive utilization of Schisandra chinensis. To summarize the existing experimental and clinical research of Schisandra chinensis, analysis of the characteristics of Schisandra, comprehensive utilization of Schisandra way. The main chemical constituents of Schisandra chinensis, lignans, polysaccharide, volatile oil, Triterpenes, organic acids, amino acids and inorganic elements. It has the advantages of increasing central nervousness, enhancing immunity, cardiovascular system tension and cardiac contractility, and reducing the pharmacological effects of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) activity in patients with viral hepatitis. Schisandra has a high medicinal value, its active ingredients in-depth development of research, in particular, the tumor is expected to find active compounds or innovative drugs, for the development of Schisandra food, health products, also has broad prospects. Introduction Schisandra chinensis is the dried ripe fruit of Schisandra chinensis in the magnolia plant. The main production in the northeast, North China, Hubei, Hunan, Jiangxi, Sichuan and other places [1]. Schisandra has the effect of convergence Guse, tonifying qi and promoting blood circulation, tonifying kidney and heart[2]. Commonly used in the treatment of long coughing virtual asthma, dream slippery, injury and thirst, palpitation and insomnia and other symptoms.
  • The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program in Georgia

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program in Georgia

    The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Regulatory Program in Georgia David Lekson, PWS Kelly Finch, PWS Richard Morgan Savannah District August, 2013 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG® Topics § Savannah District Regulatory Division § Regulatory Efficiencies § On the Horizon 2 BUILDING STRONG® Introduction § Joined Savannah District in Jan 2013 § 25 years as Branch Chief in the Wilmington District, NC § Certified Professional Wetland Scientist with extensive field and teaching experience across the country § Participated in regional and national initiatives (wetland delineation and assessment, Mitigation/Banking); Served 6- month detail at the Pentagon in 2012 § Evaluated phosphate/sand/rock mining, wind energy, port and military projects, water supply, landfills, utilities, transportation (highway, airport, rail), and other large-scale commercial and residential projects 3 BUILDING STRONG® Georgia § Largest state east of the Mississippi River TN NC § 59,425 Square miles § Abuts 5 states § 5 Ecoregions SC § 159 Counties AL § 70,000 Miles of waterways § 7.7 Million acres of wetlands FL 4 BUILDING STRONG® Savannah Regulatory Organization Lake Lanier Piedmont Branch Mr. Ed Johnson (678) 422-2722 Morrow Coastal Branch Ms. Kelly Finch (912) 652-5503 Savannah Albany § 35 Team members § 3 Field Offices & Savannah § 3 Branches (Piedmont, Coastal, Multipurpose Management) 5 BUILDING STRONG® Regulatory Efficiencies § General Permits ► Re-issuance of existing Regional and Programmatic General Permits ► New RGP37 for Inshore GADNR Artificial Reefs
  • Bay Star-Vine

    Bay Star-Vine

    Common Name: BAY STAR-VINE Scientific Name: Schisandra glabra (Brickell) Rehder Other Commonly Used Names: climbing-magnolia, magnolia-vine Previously Used Scientific Names: Schisandra coccinea Michaux Family: Schisandraceae (star-vine) Rarity Ranks: G3/S2 State Legal Status: Threatened Federal Legal Status: none Federal Wetland Status: none Description: Woody vine, twining up trees and forming low thickets on the ground; bark is gray and bumpy on older vines. Leaves ¾ - 5 inches (2 - 13 cm) long and ⅜ - 3 inches (1 - 8 cm) wide, oval with tapering leaf bases, pointed tips, and widely spaced teeth along the margins; spicy-smelling when crushed. Leaf stalks up to ⅜ - 2¾ inches (1 - 7 cm) long. Female and male flowers are on the same plant, drooping on delicate stalks 1 - 2 inches (2.5 - 5 cm) long; both female and male flowers with 9 - 12 rounded, red and green tepals (petals + sepals). Female flowers with 6 - 12 pistils, male flowers with stamens embedded in a small, flattened disk. Fruit a round or oval, red berry, up to ⅜ inch (4 - 8 mm) wide and ½ inch (0.5 - 1.5 cm) long, dangling in small, loose bunches. Similar Species: Climbing hydrangea (Decumaria barbara) attaches to trees with many, hairy roots; its leaves are opposite, and its white flowers are in flat-topped clusters. Related Rare Species: None in Georgia. Habitat: Moist, deciduous hardwood forests, often with beech, usually on lower slopes, stream terraces, and floodplains. Life History: Bay starvine reproduces vegetatively – by rooting at the nodes of vines sprawling across the ground – and sexually. It is monoecious – male and female reproductive parts are in different flowers on the same plant.
  • Streamflow Maps of Georgia's Major Rivers

    Streamflow Maps of Georgia's Major Rivers

    GEORGIA STATE DIVISION OF CONSERVATION DEPARTMENT OF MINES, MINING AND GEOLOGY GARLAND PEYTON, Director THE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Information Circular 21 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson United States Geological Survey Prepared cooperatively by the Geological Survey, United States Department of the Interior, Washington, D. C. ATLANTA 1960 STREAMFLOW MAPS OF GEORGIA'S MAJOR RIVERS by M. T. Thomson Maps are commonly used to show the approximate rates of flow at all localities along the river systems. In addition to average flow, this collection of streamflow maps of Georgia's major rivers shows features such as low flows, flood flows, storage requirements, water power, the effects of storage reservoirs and power operations, and some comparisons of streamflows in different parts of the State. Most of the information shown on the streamflow maps was taken from "The Availability and use of Water in Georgia" by M. T. Thomson, S. M. Herrick, Eugene Brown, and others pub­ lished as Bulletin No. 65 in December 1956 by the Georgia Department of Mines, Mining and Geo­ logy. The average flows reported in that publication and sho\vn on these maps were for the years 1937-1955. That publication should be consulted for detailed information. More recent streamflow information may be obtained from the Atlanta District Office of the Surface Water Branch, Water Resources Division, U. S. Geological Survey, 805 Peachtree Street, N.E., Room 609, Atlanta 8, Georgia. In order to show the streamflows and other features clearly, the river locations are distorted slightly, their lengths are not to scale, and some features are shown by block-like patterns.
  • Trophic State and Metabolism in a Southeastern Piedmont Reservoir

    Trophic State and Metabolism in a Southeastern Piedmont Reservoir

    TROPHIC STATE AND METABOLISM IN A SOUTHEASTERN PIEDMONT RESERVOIR by Mary Callie Mayhew (Under the direction of Todd C. Rasmussen) Abstract Lake Sidney Lanier is a valuable water resource in the rapidly developing region north of Atlanta, Georgia, USA. The reservoir has been managed by the U.S Army Corps of Engineers for multiple purposes since its completion in 1958. Since approximately 1990, Lake Lanier has been central to series of lawsuits in the “Eastern Water Wars” between Georgia, Alabama and Florida due to its importance as a water-storage facility within the Apalachicola-Chattahoochee-Flint River Basin. Of specific importance is the need to protect lake water quality to satisfy regional water supply demands, as well as for recreational and environmental purposes. Recently, chlorophyll a levels have exceeded state water-quality standards. These excee- dences have prompted the Georgia Environmental Protection Division to develop Total Max- imum Daily Loads for phosphorus in Lake Lanier. While eutrophication in Southeastern Piedmont impoundments is a regional problem, nutrient cycling in these lakes does not appear to behave in a manner consistent with lakes in higher latitudes, and, hence, may not respond to nutrient-abatement strategies developed elsewhere. Although phosphorus loading to Southeastern Piedmont waterbodies is high, soluble reac- tive phosphorus concentrations are generally low and phosphorus exports from the reservoir are only a small fraction of input loads. The prevailing hypothesis is that ferric oxides in the iron-rich, clay soils of the Southeastern Piedmont effectively sequester phosphorus, which then settle into the lake benthos. Yet, seasonal algal blooms suggest the presence of internal cycling driven by uncertain mechanisms.