arXiv:hep-ph/0304062v2 12 Jun 2003 pnaeu raigo hrlsmer eut nthe in results symmetry axion the chiral of under of mixing appearing breaking the [3]. bosons spontaneous component too, pseudo-Goldstone fermion leptons, the the the with to to due coupling the So, introduce to bility where xo sculdt h ur ed rnt h corre- The by not. given or is contribution fields fermion quark of the term to sponding coupled is axion stable CP-problem. at in of strong condition be position the necessary should while a stability, point of the is squared control action to mass effective order positive the the that in see axion easily can we field, em in terms ryi ece at reached is ergy prpit ffcieptnilfor potential effective appropriate where ∗ constant decay axion h mlns of smallness The rdc fgunsrnt esr n() nta ae the case, that In CP-odd (1). the in to quantity tensors coupled strength gluon field symme- of axion Peccei–Quinn product an the introducing [1] is The try mechanisms. opportunity additional elegant some un- involve most QCD, not in do accidental we rather less looks neutron, dipole electric of the moment on constraints the by basically, vations, a aee nldn h aecnrbto swl sthe masses as quark of well matrix as the contribution by caused bare term the including rameter rninpritn h Pvoaini nepii form explicit an in CP-violation the permitting grangian lcrncades [email protected] address: Electronic othat so , h elvleo xo asdpnso hte the whether on depends mass axion of value real The h togC rbe eel tefb h emo la- of term the by itself reveals problem CP strong The priori a n θ θ ak h ur ao 2.Teei possi- a is There [2]. flavor quark the marks θ edt lbladtv eento faxion of redefinition additive global a to lead L an h yaia auedet h axion the to due nature dynamical the gains θ ASnmes 23.w 48.z 11.30.Er mass 14.80.Mz, axion 12.38.Aw, of numbers: study PACS the to application its discuss and energy → = ecluaetecnrbto flclguncnest int condensate gluon local of contribution the calculate We requantity free θ .INTRODUCTION I. θ − θ + h = olwn rmteeprmna obser- experimental the from following θ θ L togCP Strong i a/f θ f 8 α θ .Snetebr n ur mass quark and bare the Since 0. = f π bare s i = ogtteaoeslto of solution above the get to 0 = a a n h rbe ssle yan by solved is problem the and , ǫ hr ehv nrdcdthe introduced have we where , µναβ g usa tt eerhCne IsiuefrHg nryPh Energy High for ”Institute Center Research State Russian − n a arg(det θ q G ¯ n eoe h ffciepa- effective the denotes a µν γ 5 ( q θ x θ n M ) ftemnmlen- minimal the if , polmi C n oa lo condensate gluon local and QCD in -problem , G rtio ocwRgo,128,Russia 142281, Region, Moscow Protvino, ) a αβ . ( x ) M , , a:+7-0967-744739 Fax: V.V.Kiselev (2) (1) fteaini ope otegun,only. in term, gluons, quadratic main the the to as coupled or is quarks, axion the if the to condensate, if coupled quark is the to axion correction the leading the as tual h edn emcue ytelclguncondensate, gluon local the by caused term leading the sate efi finterest. dis- it- of contribution the model- is condensate self extra addition, gluon involves the In Thus, sizes instanton parameters. condensate. the over wide gluon mag- tribution rather observed the the of of reach consist to nitude order should gas in instanton instantons mod- gas dense dilute the second, and the as warm, by problematic too condensate is gluon is in the vacuum properties elling the vacuum not because of ob- do determination QCD instantons as the the first, in simulations, since, dominate lattice instantons, the the with by by served competitive induced be term can the contribution This condensate. ino lo emi h quadratic the in considera- term the gluon of Nevertheless, suppress tion they contribution. since ax- gluon situation, the purely the to change coupled effective essentially quarks the ion light in the term Therefore, instanton-induced potential. the by resented olwn eea oml 4 o h xo mass: axion the for [4] formula general following where hc epteult 1, to equal put we which 1 ute,oeuulyist h eain( relation the insets usually one Further, with ntepeetsuyw aclt h ffcieaction effective the calculate we study present the In ntecluaino iga hw nFg etake we 1 Fig. in shown diagram of calculation the In ∗ h 1 G while , + + = h a µν N I ACLTOSADRESULTS AND CALCULATIONS II. qq ¯ x y a h . ( i G α α x = steclraoayo eciQincurrent, Peccei–Quinn of anomaly color the is h y ) h quadratic the o a µν G G β h K θ uu ¯ h (0) a µν µ b ∂ m u otecnrbto ftelclgluon local the of contribution the to due ′ i α ν (0) sadmninlqatt riayrep- ordinary quantity dimensional a is a 2 G ′ + G ( = y µ b a µν h ∂ ′ dd ) ¯ α ν i N (0) ′ f G i (0) = a 2 a and 2 b µ ∂ ′ h ysics”, i ν h β G h qq ′ ¯ ihrcnests(4) condensates higher + G qq ¯ (0) f a µν θ π − i tr fvacuum of -term µ b i ′ (0) ≈ i ν h eoe h ur conden- quark the denotes qq ′ + ¯ 93 (0) K G i x . Tr MeV. 3 K µ b i α ′ m ν h + M θ ∂ ′ ato ean ac- remains -action u (0) α . . . − + G 1 m i a µν , d ) (0) h qq ¯ G i = µ b ′ − ν ′ m (0) π 2 (3) f i π 2 2 so that we can write down its contribution to the effective the diagonal mass matrix of light quarks (u, d). Then, action in the explicit form we get 2 2 ′ ′ 2 αs µν µ ν 1 a mumd ′ ′ ′ ′ × V 2 [¯qq]= − hqq¯ i , (10) iΓθθ = lim (−i) ǫµναβ ǫµ ν α β hGa Gb i a 2 k→0 8π 2 fa mu + md   ′ ′ ββ α α −ig which reproduces the result of [4] in the case of quark ik (−ik ) δab Fcomb, (5) k2 condensate dominance. We stress that the mixing of the axion with the flavor-singlet meson leads to the quadratic where the combinatoric factor Fcomb = 16 is determined axion potential tending to zero in the limit of massless by the permutations of gluon strength tensors and the α β β α α β light quark in agreement with the general formula given evident relation ǫµναβ(∂ Aa − ∂ Aa )=2ǫµναβ∂ Aa . by (3) despite the calculated term due to the local gluon condensate. vacuum Indeed, comparing (10) with (7) after the substitution of θ → a/fa we could observe that the contribution by the local gluon condensate dominates in the axion mass. The picture is critically changed, if we take into account the neutral singlet of SU(3) flavor group. This singlet is coupled to the gluon anomaly, too, in the same manner θ θ as the axion with an analogous constant fs instead of fa, which produces the mixing of masses for the axion and singlet [4]. The resulting effect has been described in FIG. 1: The quadratic θ-term caused by the local gluon con- the Introduction, and we return to the quark condensate densate. dominance in the axion mass up to small corrections. The description of above mechanism is given in [4] in detail. For the vacuum expectation value we evidently have Nevertheless, we stress that expression (7) gives ex- the following general expression conserving the color and plicit result in contrast to rather indefinite instanton- Lorentz symmetries: induced potential. Let us discuss the renormalization group (RG) prop- ′ ′ δ ′ ′ ′ ′ erties of results obtained. First, we can easily see that hGµν Gµ ν i = ab (gµµ gνν − gµν gνµ ) hGµν Gd i. (6) a b 96 d µν the contribution by the quark condensate (10) enters into the axion mass in the RG invariant form, since the ratio Then, we find the gluon condensate part of quadratic of quark masses and the product of quark mass with the term in the effective potential for the global phase θ condensate are invariant under the action of RG. Sec- ond, the gluon condensate term due to (7) reveals the 2 2 2 αs µν a RG dependence with nonzero anomalous dimension in V 2 [G ]= θ G G , (7) θ 8π2 a µν  QCD. However, this anomalous dimension is in the next αs-order under study. Therefore, we have no any con- while the linear term due to the bare lagrangian in (1) tradiction with the QCD principles in the given accuracy does not contribute into the vacuum energy, since the over αs. physical vacuum infers condition (6). We do not make some numerical estimates, since they We can straightforwardly get the contribution given would be rather qualitative under assumptions on the by the local quark condensate into the quadratic term of effective value of αs. axion in the way analogous to the described calculation Thus, we clarify the physical meaning of our calcula- with the gluon condensate, so that tions and results.

2 2 |gn| Va2 [¯qq]= −a hq¯nqni, (8) III. CONCLUSION m Xn n which can be further transformed after the substitution We have calculated the contribution by the local gluon for the universal coupling of the axion to the quarks [4] condensate into the effective potential quadratic over the θ determining the CP-violating term of the gluon 1 1 anomaly in QCD. Such the effective potential gives the gn = −1 , (9) fa Tr M contribution into the axion mass providing the solution of strong CP-problem in the Peccei–Quinn mechanism. expressing a consistency for the definition of axion decay We expect the dominance of contribution caused by the constant through the calculation of axial anomaly and local gluon condensate in comparison with the instanton- the absence of mass mixing between the axion and neu- induced potential, which could be tested by the lattice tral pseudo-Goldstone mesons π0 and η. Here, M denotes simulations. 3

The axion plays an essential role in the connection of esting papers devoted to the problem under discussion: particle physics with the cosmology, in particular, as a solutions of strong CP-problem [6, 7], on the Yang–Mills dark matter candidate [5]. This fact makes the stud- vacuum [8]. ies on its mass to be rather significant. We see that the QCD dynamics in such the investigations is of im- This work is in part supported by the Russian Founda- portance. We would like to point to some recent inter- tion for Basic Research, grants 01-02-99315, 01-02-16585.

[1] R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Phys. Rev. D 16, 1791 169, 73 (1986); (1977). K. Choi, K. Kang and J. E. Kim, Phys. Lett. B 181, 145 [2] J. E. Kim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 103 (1979); (1986). M. A. Shifman, A. I. Vainshtein and V. I. Zakharov, Nucl. [5] S. Khalil and C. Munoz, Contemp. Phys. 43, 51 (2002) Phys. B 166, 493 (1980). [arXiv:hep-ph/0110122]. [3] M. Dine, W. Fischler and M. Srednicki, Phys. Lett. B 104, [6] S. L. Glashow, arXiv:hep-ph/0110178. 199 (1981); [7] Z. Berezhiani, L. Gianfagna and M. Giannotti, Phys. Lett. A. R. Zhitnitsky, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 31, 260 (1980) [Yad. B 500, 286 (2001) [arXiv:hep-ph/0009290]. Fiz. 31, 497 (1980)]. [8] V. Chernyak, arXiv:hep-th/9808092. [4] H. Georgi, D. B. Kaplan and L. Randall, Phys. Lett. B