KS2 History: the Romans Invade Britain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

KS2 History: the Romans Invade Britain 1 KS2 History: The Romans Invade Britain Timeline Julius Caesar’s first invasion R O M A N S I N B R I T A I N 100 BC AD 1 AD 100 AD 200 AD 300 AD 400 AD 500 Today Rome is a city in Italy. Towards the end of the Iron Age, life in Britain was very different to life in Rome — Rome was more developed than Britain. What do you know about Rome and the Romans? A tale of two different lands At that time, Rome was ruled by a dictator. It had a government, which collected taxes, and a very organised army, which had conquered many different countries. There were lots of grand buildings in Rome where people could gather, including temples and public baths. The people in Britain were called Celts. They lived together in groups called tribes, that were ruled by a chief. They lived in settlements such as hillforts, which may have looked like this. They didn’t have a government, an army or pay taxes. The only buildings they had where people could gather together were places like Stonehenge, Would you have preferred to live in where people did things like have feasts. Rome or in Britain at this time? Why? Look at the picture of Stonehenge on the right. How is it different from the buildings in Rome that you can see in the picture below? © CGP 2020 KS2 History: The Romans Invade Britain 2 In 55 BC, an army general from Rome called Julius Caesar invaded Britain. What problems do you think an army general from Rome might have had when invading Britain? A stormy invasion... When Caesar came to Britain, he wasn’t prepared for the British weather. He was born near the Mediterranean Sea, which is mostly calm and only has a small change in tides. When he arrived in the English Channel the storms and high tides battered his ships. Another problem was that Caesar’s ships were big and heavy. They had to anchor in deep water away from the shoreline. What is the Roman soldier doing in this picture? How do you think he felt? Caesar’s soldiers had to jump into the cold How well do you think they were able water and wade to shore in full armour. to fight once they reached the shore? Success for Caesar? Do you think Caesar managed to conquer Britain in 55 BC? Caesar won some battles and took some hostages. But when autumn brought the stormy weather again, Caesar took his soldiers back to Gaul (an area where countries like France, Belgium and the Netherlands are today). He planned to return the next year to conquer Britain. Was Britain too different to Rome? Caesar didn’t succeed in taking over Britain on his first invasion. At that time Britain was very different to Rome, but the things that caught Caesar out the most were the tides and the weather. Caesar hadn’t given up though and still planned to return the next year. Taken from CGP’s KS2 Discover & Learn History: Romans in Britain — The Study Book (HRR21). See the full KS2 Discover & Learn range at cgpbooks.co.uk. © CGP 2020 3 KS2 History: The Romans Invade Britain Towards the end of the Iron Age, Rome was very different to Britain. Read the pages of the Study Book to remind you what life was like in Rome and in Britain at this time. 1. What would it be like living in Rome and Britain towards the end of the Iron Age? Complete the table below to show what life was like in each place. Rome Britain Who would you be ruled by? Would you have to pay taxes? Would you have an army to defend you? 2. Write down two other differences that there were between Rome and Britain at this time. 1) ................................................................................................................................. ...................................................................................................................................... 2) ................................................................................................................................. ...................................................................................................................................... Taken from CGP’s KS2 Discover & Learn History: Romans in Britain — The Activity Book (HRW22). © CGP 2020 See the full KS2 Discover & Learn range at cgpbooks.co.uk. 4 In 55 BC, Julius Caesar and his army travelled across the English Channel in ships. Have a look at the information in the Study Book. 3. Draw a picture of Caesar and his army arriving in Britain. Think about where they had to anchor their ships and how they got to shore. 4. Use the Study Book to find out if these sentences about Caesar’s first invasion of Britain are true or false. Tick the correct box for each statement. True False Caesar was prepared for the tides and storms in the English Channel. Caesar’s ships were very big and heavy. Caesar succeeded in taking over Britain in 55 BC. Caesar didn’t win any battles. Caesar planned to return to Britain the next year. “I understand how Britain and Rome were different and I know about Caesar’s first invasion of Britain.” KS2 History: The Romans Invade Britain © CGP 2020 5 KS2 History: The Romans Invade Britain Study Book National Curriculum Aims 2 3 The Romans Invade Britain In 55 BC, an army general from Rome called Julius Caesar invaded Britain. Timeline What problems do you think an army general from Julius Caesar’s first invasion R O M A N S I N B R I T A I N Rome might have had when invading Britain? • Understand similarity and difference and 100 BC AD 1 AD 100 AD 200 AD 300 AD 400 AD 500 Today Rome is a city in Italy. Towards the end of the Iron Age, life in Britain was very different A stormy invasion... to life in Rome — Rome was more developed than Britain. When Caesar came to Britain, he wasn’t prepared for the British weather. He was born use them to draw contrasts. What do you know about Rome and the Romans? near the Mediterranean Sea, which is mostly calm and only has a small change in tides. A tale of two different lands When he arrived in the English Channel the At that time, Rome was ruled by a dictator. It had a government, storms and high tides battered his ships. which collected taxes, and a very organised army, which had 2 3 Another problem was that Caesar’s ships conquered many different countries. There were lots of In 55 BC, Julius Caesar and his army travelled across the English Channel in ships. were big and heavy. They had to anchor grand buildings in Rome where people could gather, Have a look at page 3 of your Study Book. The Romansin deepInvade water away from Britain the shoreline. including temples and public baths. • Know the history of Britain as a 3. Draw a picture of Caesar and his army arriving in Britain. Towards the end of the Iron Age, Rome was very different to Britain. Read page 2 of The people in Britain were called Celts. They lived together Think about where they had to anchor their ships and how they got to shore. your Study Book to remind you what lifeWhat was is likethe Romanin Rome soldier and doingin Britain in this at picture? this time. in groups called tribes, that were ruled by a chief. They lived How do you think he felt? in settlements such as hillforts, which may have looked like this. 1. What would it be like living in Rome and Britain towards the end of the Iron Age? They didn’t have a government, an army or pay taxes. Complete the table below to show whatCaesar’s life wassoldiers like inhad each to jumpplace .into the cold The only buildings they had where people could How well do you think they were able chronological narrative. water and wade to shore in full armour. to fight once they reached the shore? gather together were places like Stonehenge, Would you have preferred to live in where people did things like have feasts. Rome or in Britain at this time? Why? RomeSuccess for Caesar?Britain Look at the picture of Stonehenge on the right. How is it different from the buildings in Rome Do you think Caesar managed to conquer Britain in 55 BC? that you can see in the picture below? Who would you be ruled by? Caesar won some battles and took some hostages. But when autumn brought the stormy weather again, Caesar took his • Know and understand significant aspects of soldiers back to Gaul (an area where countries like France, Would you have Belgium and the Netherlands are today). He planned to return to pay taxes? the next year to conquer Britain. Was Britain too different to Rome? the history of the wider world, for example, Would you have Caesar didn’t succeed in taking over Britain on his first invasion. At that 4.time Use Britain page was 3 of the Study Book to find out if these sentences about Caesar’s an army to very different to Rome, but the things that caught Caesar out the most werefirst invasionthe tides of and Britain are true or false. Tick the correct box for each statement. defend you? the weather. Caesar hadn’t given up though and still planned to return the next year. True False Caesar was prepared for the tides and storms in the English Channel. the expansion of empires. 2. Write down two other differences that there Caesar’s ships were very big and heavy. were between Rome and Britain at this time. Caesar succeeded in taking over Britain in 55 BC. 1) ................................................................................................................................. Caesar didn’t win any battles. ...................................................................................................................................... Caesar planned to return to Britain the next year.
Recommended publications
  • The Late Republic in 5 Timelines (Teacher Guide and Notes)
    1 180 BC: lex Villia Annalis – a law regulating the minimum ages at which a individual could how political office at each stage of the cursus honorum (career path). This was a step to regularising a political career and enforcing limits. 146 BC: The fall of Carthage in North Africa and Corinth in Greece effectively brought an end to Rome’s large overseas campaigns for control of the Mediterranean. This is the point that the historian Sallust sees as the beginning of the decline of the Republic, as Rome had no rivals to compete with and so turn inwards, corrupted by greed. 139 BC: lex Gabinia tabelleria– the first of several laws introduced by tribunes to ensure secret ballots for for voting within the assembliess (this one applied to elections of magistrates). 133 BC – the tribunate of Tiberius Gracchus, who along with his younger brother, is seen as either a social reformer or a demagogue. He introduced an agrarian land that aimed to distribute Roman public land to the poorer elements within Roman society (although this act quite likely increased tensions between the Italian allies and Rome, because it was land on which the Italians lived that was be redistributed). He was killed in 132 BC by a band of senators led by the pontifex maximus (chief priest), because they saw have as a political threat, who was allegedly aiming at kingship. 2 123-121 BC – the younger brother of Tiberius Gracchus, Gaius Gracchus was tribune in 123 and 122 BC, passing a number of laws, which apparent to have aimed to address a number of socio-economic issues and inequalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Social and Political Context for Obstruction in Roman Love
    THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT FOR OBSTRUCTION IN ROMAN LOVE ELEGY by AMY K. LEONARD (Under the Direction of Charles Platter) ABSTRACT This thesis will examine the presence of erotic obstruction in the poems of the first century B.C. writers of Roman love elegy: Tibullus, Propertius and Ovid. While erotic poetry prior to this time period had long necessitated a sense of obstruction, the deliberate construction of a failed love-affair by the Roman elegists serves to define their particular use of obstruction as a unique discursive strategy. The observation has been made that the time period marking the emergence and disappearance of Roman elegy qualifies it as a discrete, time-bound genre. In light of these time considerations, the obstruction motif in elegy, as a means of articulating a continual sense of failure, is capable of giving involuntary voice to events taking place on the Roman socio-political front, specifically, as this thesis will argue, a perceived loss of autonomy under the changing political structures at the end of the Republic. INDEX WORDS: Obstruction, Roman love elegy, Tibullus, Propertius, Ovid, Door, Vir, Lena, Illness, Distance, Unfaithfulness, Amores 2.19, Amores 3.4 THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT FOR OBSTRUCTION IN ROMAN LOVE ELEGY by AMY KIRK LEONARD B.A., The University of Georgia, 1996 A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Georgia in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree MASTER OF ARTS ATHENS, GEORGIA 2004 © 2004 Amy Kirk Leonard All Rights Reserved THE SOCIAL AND POLITICAL CONTEXT FOR OBSTRUCTION IN ROMAN LOVE ELEGY by AMY KIRK LEONARD Major Professor: Charles Platter Committee: Keith Dix Nancy Felson Electronic Version Approved: Maureen Grasso Dean of the Graduate School The University of Georgia August 2004 DEDICATION I dedicate this thesis to my husband, David Leonard, without whose unconditional support during my years in graduate school I would never have made it to the completion of this degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Art from the Louvre
    Roman Art from the Louvre Resource for Educators American Federation of Arts Roman Art from the Louvre Resource for Educators American Federation of Arts Roman Art from the Louvre is organized by the American Federation of Arts and the Musée du Louvre. The exhibition is supported by an indemnity American Federation of Arts 305 East 47th Street, 10th floor from the Federal Council on the Arts and the Humanities. New York, NY 10017 212.988.7700 The AFA is a nonprofit institution that organizes art exhibitions for presen- www.afaweb.org tation in museums around the world, publishes scholarly exhibition cata- logues, and develops educational materials and programs. © 2007 American Federation of Arts All materials included in this resource may be reproduced for educational purposes. Please direct questions about this resource to: Suzanne Elder Burke Director of Education American Federation of Arts 212.988.7700 x226 [email protected] Exhibition Itinerary Indianapolis Museum of Art September 23, 2007–January 6, 2008 Seattle Art Museum February 21–May 11, 2008 Oklahoma City Museum of Art June 19–October 12, 2008 Design/Production: Emily Lessard Front cover: Fragment of a Relief of a Double Suovetaurilia Sacrifice (detail), 1st or 2nd quarter of 1st century A.D. (no. 4) Back cover: Knife Handle in the Shape of a Thracian Gladiator, 2nd half of 1st century A.D. (no. 6) CONTENTS About This Resource 4 Exhibition Overview 5 Ancient Roman Society 6 History of Ancient Rome Government—The Emperor and the Senate Citizenship Non-Citizens—Foreigners, Slaves, and Freedmen Leisure 10 The Baths Roman Theater Circus Maximus The Amphitheater Religion 11 Guide to Roman Gods and Goddesses 13 Guide to Roman Vessel Forms 16 Interesting Facts about Ancient Rome 18 Selected Works of Art 19 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar
    Working Paper CEsA CSG 168/2018 ANCIENT ROMAN POLITICS – JULIUS CAESAR Maria SOUSA GALITO Abstract Julius Caesar (JC) survived two civil wars: first, leaded by Cornelius Sulla and Gaius Marius; and second by himself and Pompeius Magnus. Until he was stabbed to death, at a senate session, in the Ides of March of 44 BC. JC has always been loved or hated, since he was alive and throughout History. He was a war hero, as many others. He was a patrician, among many. He was a roman Dictator, but not the only one. So what did he do exactly to get all this attention? Why did he stand out so much from the crowd? What did he represent? JC was a front-runner of his time, not a modern leader of the XXI century; and there are things not accepted today that were considered courageous or even extraordinary achievements back then. This text tries to explain why it’s important to focus on the man; on his life achievements before becoming the most powerful man in Rome; and why he stood out from every other man. Keywords Caesar, Politics, Military, Religion, Assassination. Sumário Júlio César (JC) sobreviveu a duas guerras civis: primeiro, lideradas por Cornélio Sula e Caio Mário; e depois por ele e Pompeius Magnus. Até ser esfaqueado numa sessão do senado nos Idos de Março de 44 AC. JC foi sempre amado ou odiado, quando ainda era vivo e ao longo da História. Ele foi um herói de guerra, como outros. Ele era um patrício, entre muitos. Ele foi um ditador romano, mas não o único.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar and the Germans
    Julius Caesar and the Germans Amelia Carolina Sparavigna Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy This article is proposing a discussion of what was written in De Bello Gallico on Caesar's military campaign against the Germans, in particular against Usipetes and Tencteri. It will also be analyzed what was said by Plutarch about the accusation, made to Caesar by Cato the Younger, of having violated the truce with these Germans. Finally, the texts of Caesar and Plutarch will be compared with what is written in the books by Luciano Canfora and Jérôme Carcopino. Torino, 6 Agosto 2018. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.1340670 Recently, some Dutch archaeologists have proposed a reconstruction of the physical appearance of Julius Caesar [1]. The reconstruction, which I discussed in [2-4], was used to launch a book by Tom Buijtendorp, Caesar in de Lage Landen, on Caesar's military campaign against the Germans, in particular against Usipetes and Tencteri tribes, a campaign that took place in the territory crossed by the Rhine and today located in the Netherlands. [5]. Some clarifications on this military campaign are, in my opinion, necessary. They are contained in the article that I am now proposing. In it, the reader will find the analysis of what Caesar wrote in his De Bello Gallico and what Plutarch told about the accusation made to Caesar by Cato the Younger, of violating the truce with these Germans. Finally, the texts of Caesar and Plutarch will be compared with what is written in the books by Luciano Canfora and Jérôme Carcopino. Here the story of what happened.
    [Show full text]
  • Roman Britain and the Anglo-Saxon Settlements
    Roman Britain and the Anglo-Saxon Settlements History, as the recorded annals of civilized man, began in Englandn in the year 55 B.c., when Julius Caesar's troops waded ashore on the beaches north of Dover.1 Caesar was a man of remarkable military ability and boundless confidence. He was an astute opportunist who rose to power amidst the violent political turmoil of the late Roman Re­ public and a great creative statesman who laid the groundwork for Rome's transformation from republic to empire. It was this man, this military ad­ venturer and political genius, who first brought England into the orbit of civilization. Caesar's invasion of Britain was almost an afterthought to his cam­ paigns against the Gauls. Between 58 and 50 B.C., prior to his rise to supreme power in Rome, he undertook the conquest of an extensive territory known as Gaul, which corresponds very roughly to modern France and was then inhabited by semicivilized Celts. Although Caesar could not realize it, the conquest of Gaul was to have an incalculable influence on the development of \Vestern civilization in later centuries. For Gaul extended far to the north of the Mediterranean Basin, and Caesar's victories brought Roman govern­ ment and culture into the \Vestern European heartland. The Romanization of Gaul proved to be a crucial factor in providing medieval and modern Europe with its enduring classical heritage. 1 Several good general accounts of Roman Britain are available: R. G. Collingwood and J. N. L. Myres, Roman Britain and the English Settlements ( 2nd ed., Oxford, 1937), J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logistics of the Roman Army at War (264 B.C. - A.D
    THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) COLUMBIA STUDIES IN THE CLASSICAL TRADITION under the direction of WILLIAM V. HARRIS (Editor) • PAUL OSKAR KRISTELLER EUGENE F. RICE, JR. • ALAN CAMERON JAMES A. COULTER • RICHARD BRILLIANT SUZANNE SAID VOLUME XXIII THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) BY JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 1999 This book is printed on acid -free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roth, Jonathan, 1955– The logistics of the Roman army at war (264 B.C.-A.D. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. p. cm. — (Columbia studies in the classical tradition, ISSN 0166-1302 ; v. 23) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 9004112715 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Rome—Army—Supplies and stores. 2. Rome—Army– –Transportation—Equipment and supplies. 3. Logistics. 4. Rome– –History, Military—265-30 B.C. 5. Rome—History, Military—30 B.C.-476 A.D. I. Title. II. Series. DG89.R675 1998 355.4’11’0937—dc21 98–42368 CIP Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Roth, Jonathan P.: The logistics of the Roman army at war : (264 b.c. - a.d. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. – Leiden ; Boston ; Köln : Brill, 1998 (Columbia studies in the classical tradition ; Vol. 23) ISBN 90–04–11271–5 ISSN 0166-1302 ISBN 90 04 11271 5 © Copyright 1999 by The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Greco-Roman Conception of the North from Pytheas to Tacitus
    ARCTIC VOL. 37, NO. 4 (DECEMBER 1984) P. 341-346 The Greco-Roman Conception of the North from Qtheas to Tacitus * R. CHEVALLIER* INTRODUCTION The increase in archaeological data, thanks to aerial surveys and underwater exploration, is helping.towards a better under- In this attempt to outline the main phases .in the -unveiling of standing of ancientwritings and a’ new .appraisal of old. the north in terms of present-day research, we define “North” .material. as all the regions bordering the Atlantic Ocean which Strabo To these sources should be addedthe texts of the early Mid- contains in his expression ““Paroceanitide”; i.e., northwest Gaul (including the provinceof Beigium), the BritannicIsles, dle Ages which, especiallyin the case of records pertaining to worship,sometimes preserve thememory of prehistoric Lower Germany, and the Scandinavian peninsula. events. I Between the time of Herodotus, who.wrote about 500 B.C. that he had met no-one who .had seen the sea which was re- puted to be at the,extremity of Europe and no-one who.knew BEFORE PYTHEAS the Cassiterides islands,’ andthe time of Tacitus, who wrotein It .appears certain today that the seas of thenorthwest - the .the Life of Agricolu,2 published in A.D. 98: “We have COR- Atlantic, the .English Channel. and the NorthSea - have been quered the wholeof Britain”, there occurred a major event of sailed since prehistoric times, 1 I not only by .local populations historical and scientific importance - the voyage of Pytheas butby navigatorscome from afar. There isarchaeological - .which was an exploit never surpassed by any achievement proof for this .in the geographical ,spread ,of the megalithic ofthe Romans.
    [Show full text]
  • Lucretius and De Rerum Natura: Appreciation and Appraisal
    Lucretius and De Rerum Natura: Appreciation and Appraisal Ï The Man Rome was the birthplace of Lucretius. This fact in itself is not surprising, but it becomes more significant when we reflect that very few of the immortals of Latin letters were Romans by birth. The Rome of Lucretius was that of the Republic. In the divisions of Latin literature the time of the Republic holds an important place, for during the centuries between 245 and 3o B. C. Roman letters had their beginnings, and progressed far enough to prove worthy to succeed if not supersede Greek literature, of the later period. Where Greek literature declined, Latin literature took the ascendant. Repu­ blican Latin bristles with the names of Ennius, father of Latin poetry ; Cato, the eloquent censor, founder of Latin prose ; Plautus and Terence, delighting their hearers with fully Lati­ nized reproductions of later Greek comedy; Cicero, Rome's greatest man of letters; Caesar, greatest of all her sons, rich in achievement with the sword and a writer of merit; Catullus, enchanting lyric poet of the inner shrine; not to mention Luci- lius, the satirist, Horace's fore-runner, and Varro the volumi­ nous writer of Menippean satires and romance. In this galaxy shines Lucretius. His immediate contemporaries were Caesar, Catullus and Cicero, each one of whom has gained distinct recognition in a chosen field of letters. That Lucretius has failed to find the recognition he well deserves, may be due to these two facts, that his appeal is less universal than that of Catullus, for example, and his philosophy less acceptable than that which Cicero champions.
    [Show full text]
  • Cicero 106-43
    Demosthenes 384-322 Parallel Lives M. Tullius Cicero 106-43 • “…many similarities in their na- • tural character, as their passion • for distinction, their love of li- • berty in civil life, their want of • courage in dangers and war…” • and at the same time also to • have added many accidental • resemblances.” • Both became great from • small beginnings, contes- • ted with tyrants, lost “The Power of persuading and • their daughters, suffered governing the people did, • exile and returned with indeed belong equally to both, so that those who had armies and • honor, fought for liberty, camps at their command stood in need of • and died when liberty their assistance.” • died For their countrymen. Judicial Speeches (81 BC) Pro Quinctio (On behalf of Publius 63 BC) Pro Rabirio Perduellionis Reo (On behalf Quinctius) of Gaius Rabirius on a Charge of Treason (80 BC) Pro Roscio Amerino (In Defense of 63 BC) Pro Murena (In Defense of Lucius Sextus Roscius of Ameria) Licinius Murena, in the court for electoral (77 BC) Pro Q. Roscio Comoedo (In bribery) Defense of Quintus Roscius Gallus the (62 BC) Pro Sulla (In Defense of Publius Comic actor) Cornelius Sulla (70 BC) Divinatio in Caecilium (Against (62 BC) Pro Archia Poeta (In Defense of Quintus Caecilius in the process for Aulus Licinius Archias the poet) selecting a prosecutor of Gaius Verres) (59 BC) Pro Antonio (In Defense of Gaius (70 BC) In Verrem (Against Gaius Verres, Antonius) [lost entire, or never written] or The Verrines) (59 BC) Pro Flacco (In Defense of Lucius (71 BC) Pro Tullio
    [Show full text]
  • Ketan Ramakrishnan's Lit Notes, Expanded
    A LUDICROUSLY COMPREHENSIVE OUTLINE OF LATIN LITERATURE KHR / [email protected] Please ask before circulating. Birthplaces 1) Livius Andronicus – Tarentum 2) Gnaeus Naevius – Campania 3) Titus Maccius Plautus – Sarsina (in Umbria) 4) Caecilius Statius – Insubrian Gaul from Mediolanum/Milan 5) Quintus Ennius – Rudiae 6) Cato the Elder – Tusculum 7) Terence – Carthage 8) Pacuvius – Brundisium 9) Accius – Pisaurum 10) Lucilius – Suessa Aurunca 11) Lucius Pomponius – Bologna 12) Marcus Furius Bibaculus – Cremona 13) Cinna – Brescia (Cisapline Gaul) 14) Licinius Calvus – Rome 15) Catullus – Verona 16) Varro Atacinus – Atax 17) Varro Reatinus – Reate 18) Cornelius Nepos – Ostiglia/Pavia 19) Sallust – Amiternum 20) Vergil – Mantua 21) Horace – Venusia 22) Cornelius Gallus – Forum Iulii 23) Tibullus – Gabii/Pedum 24) Propertius – Assissium 25) Ovid – Sulmo 26) Livy – Padua/Patavium 27) Asinius Pollo – Teate 28) Velleius Paterculus – Aeclanum 29) Columella – Gades 30) Pomponius Mela – Tingentera 31) Verrius Flaccus – Praeneste 32) Seneca the Elder – Cordoba 33) Seneca the Younger – Cordoba 34) Plutarch – Chaeroneia 35) Persius Flaccus – Volaterrae/Volterra 36) Papinius Statius – Naples 37) Pliny the Elder – Comum 38) Pliny the Younger – Comum 39) Martial – Bilbilis 40) Quintilian – Calagurris 41) Tacitus – Terni 42) Fronto – Cirta (in Numidia) 43) Apuleius – Madaura 44) Tertullian – Carthage 45) Minucius Felix – Cirta (in Numidia) 46) Cyprian – Carthage 47) Nemesianus – Carthage A Ludicrously Comprehensive Outline of Latin Literature 1 48) Arnobius
    [Show full text]