DOCSLIB.ORG

Macedonia's Presidential Elections: Background and History Anastas Vangeli

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Macedonia's Presidential Elections: Background and History Anastas Vangeli ISSN: 2560-1601 Vol. 16, No. 1 (MK) March 2019 North Macedonia political briefing: Macedonia's Presidential Elections: Background and History Anastas Vangeli 1052 Budapest Petőfi Sándor utca 11. +36 1 5858 690 Kiadó: Kína-KKE Intézet Nonprofit Kft. [email protected] Szerkesztésért felelős személy: Chen Xin Kiadásért felelős személy: Huang Ping china-cee.eu 2017/01 Macedonia's Presidential Elections: Background and History Introduction The key event in the political calendar of Macedonia in 2019 are the sixth national presidential elections. The first round of the elections will take place on April 21, 2019; if needed, a second round will take place on May 5, 2019. The incumbent President, Gjorge Ivanov, who is finishing his second term in power, will not run for re-election, as according to the Constitution, a President cannot serve for more than two consecutive terms. Three candidates will compete in the first round of the elections: Stevo Pendarovski backed by the ruling coalition of SDSM and DUI (and their junior partners); Gordana Siljanovska-Davkova backed by VMRO-DPMNE (and their junior partners); and Blerim Reka, backed by Besa and the Alliance for Albanians (smaller ethnic Albanian parties). However, even though backed by political parties, all of the three candidates – all of them university professors – present themselves as independent; they have all been nominated via a process of collection of 10.000 voters' signatures (and not through the alternative method, securing the support of 30 members of Parliament). The candidate who will obtain “a majority (50%+1) of the total number of voters” wins the election. Unless there is a clear winner on April 21 (very unlikely, given the history of the presidential elections, and the public opinion polls ahead of the 2019 election), a second round will take place, in which only the top two vote-getters from the first round will take part (expected to be Pendarovski and Siljanovska). The 2019 presidential elections are the first nation-wide elections that take place after the official change of the name of the country into “the Republic of North Macedonia,” and the attitudes towards the name issue and the process of renaming of the country play an important role in the campaign and in the outcome. Looking forward to the 2019 Presidential Elections, in this paper we provide a quick background on Macedonia's Presidency, and then provide an overview of the past presidential elections and the four Presidents of the country in the period 1991-2019. We will discuss the candidates and the context of the 2019 elections in the next paper on Macedonia's politics (April 2019), and the outcome and consequences of the Presidential elections in the one after the next (May 2019). 1 Macedonia's Presidency Macedonia has a parliamentary political system; the President of the country is part of the executive branch of the government, but their role is not as significant as in presidential or semi- presidential systems. The President is chosen via direct, free and secret popular elections in the country and in the diasporic communities; the President is elected for a term of 5 years, and can serve maximum two consecutive terms; by law, the President, once elected must detach themselves from any other affiliation of work while in office. While mostly ceremonial, the President has certain powers that make the Presidency important for the political system of the country. The President is the highest dignitary and representative of the Republic, making them particularly important in terms of the implementation of Macedonia's foreign policy and the international representation of the country. The President is also a Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the country, and presides over the National Security Council that oversees and coordinates national security and defense affairs. The President also matters in the process of promulgation of laws – the Parliament cannot promulgate new laws without the signature of the President of the Republic – although the President, according to the letter of the Constitution, does not have unlimited power to choose which laws they will sign or not (in some cases the President is obliged to sign a law, e.g. when a law is reconsidered by the Parliament after initial rejection of the President to sign; or when a law is adopted with a 2/3 of the votes in Parliament). There are few other powers that define the Presidency, which are to be found in Article 84 of the Macedonian Constitution, according to which the President: “- nominates a mandator to constitute the Government of the Republic of Macedonia; - appoints and dismisses by decree ambassadors and other diplomatic representatives of the Republic of Macedonia abroad; - accepts the credentials and letters of recall of foreign diplomatic representatives; - proposes two judges to sit on the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Macedonia; - proposes two members of the Republican Judicial Council; - appoints three members to the Security Council of the Republic of Macedonia;- proposes the members of the Council for Inter-Ethnic Relations; 2 - appoints and dismisses other holders of state and public office determined by the Constitution and the law; - grants decorations and honours in accordance with the law; - grants pardons in accordance with the law; and - performs other duties determined by the Constitution.” Since its independence, Macedonia has had four presidents: Kiro Gligorov (1991-1999), Boris Trajkovski (1999-2004), Branko Crvenkovski (2004-2009) and Gjorge Ivanov (2009- 2019). In 2019, the voters will elect the fifth President of the Republic. While we will discuss the candidates for the 2019 elections in the next politics paper (April 2019), here we will briefly overview the history of the presidencies and (the often controversial) presidential elections in the past 18 years. Macedonia's Presidents 1991-2019 Macedonia's President was not always chosen via popular direct elections. Kiro Gligorov, a veteran Yugoslav politician, was elected in January 1991 via a vote in the Parliament (he had an overwhelming support of 114 out of 120 Members of Parliament) to be the first President of Macedonia. Gligorov established himself as a charismatic and powerful President. He oversaw the country's independence from Yugoslavia (8 September 1991) and was instrumental in preventing Macedonia descending into war following the breakup of Yugoslavia. In 1994, Gligorov, supported by the ruling coalition led by SDSM, ran for the first direct Presidential elections; his only opponent was Ljubisha Gjorgiveski supported by VMRO-DPMNE; Gligorov won the elections by a landslide. Nevertheless, the elections were marred by controversies – a number of votes were excluded from the count, which lead to contestation of the electoral outcome by VMRO-DPMNE. Gligorov survived an assassination attempt in 1995 and after being released from the hospital, returned to office and completed his mandate, stepping down in 1999. Gligorov passed away in 2012. The second President of the country was Boris Trajkovski, who was backed by VMRO- DPMNE. In the 1999 elections he had five opponents. In the first round, Trajovski finished second, trailing behind Tito Petkovski of SDSM. However, in the second round, he managed to attract the votes of some of the other candidates eliminated in the first round, and win against 3 Petkovski. The 1999 elections were also marred by a number of irregularities, with the voting process in the second round being repeated in more than 200 polling stations. This has also led to the outcome being contested by the loser of the elections – SDSM did not recognize Trajkovski as a legitimate President well into his mandate. Trajkovski, nevertheless, managed to establish himself as a peacemaking figure during the armed conflict in 2001; for his role in the reconciliation process, he is credited by various political actors in the country and abroad. Trajkovski died in a plane crash in February 2004 – his plane crashed on the territory of Bosnia and Herzegovina. After the death of Trajkovski, early Presidential elections took place in April 2004. The then incumbent Prime Minister Branko Crvenkovski, the leader of SDSM (who also was Prime Minister of Macedonia 1992-1998) won the elections. In the first round, he won the highest number of votes, running against three opponents (but did not win the majority of the votes); in the second round, he faced Sashko Kedev, the number 2 vote-getter from the first round, a well known cardio-surgeon who was supported by VMRO-DPMNE. Crvenkovski won the second round by a huge margin, however the electoral outcome led to a number of allegations of electoral fraud by VMRO-DPMNE, who had initially disputed the legitimacy of the Crvenkovski. Crvenkovski, who was considered the politically most powerful figure in Macedonia since its independence until the mid 2000s, had limited success as a President, and often clashed with the VMRO-DPMNE government led by Nikola Gruevski who took power in 2006. Crvenkovski did not run for re-election; instead, he returned to the position of president of SDSM and leader of the opposition, after his mandate as President of the Republic ended in 2009. He retired from politics in 2013. Crvenkovski was succeeded by Gjorge Ivanov, a professor of political science supported by VMRO-DPMNE, who won the presidential elections in 2009, in the competition of a total of seven candidates. In the second round, Ivanov won against Ljubomir Frchkoski, a professor of law, who used to serve in the SDSM governments in the 1990s. Ivanov and Frchkoski used to be close friends and collaborators, but by the elections in 2009 their friendship turned into a bitter rivalry. Ivanov won by a huge margin, although the turnout in the second round was slightly above the required threshold for Presidential elections (40% of the registered voters).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANNEX 2 Crosstabulations of the Survey Questions with The
    "WHO OWNS ALEXANDER THE GREAT?": A QUESTION UPON WHICH EU ENLARGEMENT RELIES ANNEX 2 Crosstabulations of the survey questions with the respondents ethnicity According to you which was the most important period for the formation of Macedonian identity? Ethnicity Macedonian Albanian Turk According to you which Antiquity 7.6% 0.5% was the most important Medieval Slavic Christianity (period of 22.2% 12.5% 21.9% period for formation of Brothers Cyril and Methodius) Macedonian identity? Ilinden Uprising (organized revolt 16.7% 1.9% 18.8% against the Ottoman Empire 1903) Partisan period of WWII 7.6% 4.6% 15.6% SFR Yugoslavia 14.5% 19.0% 18.8% Independence (1991- present) 21.5% 19.4% 12.5% Bucharest agreement (1913) 0.2% I don’t know 7.5% 13.9% 12.5% No answer 2.0% 28.2% They are all important The end of the 19century 0.2% Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0 % Ethnicity Roma Serbian Vlach Other According to you which Antiquity 4.5% 18.2% was the most important Medieval Slavic Christianity 17.4% 13.6% 32.0% 4.5% period for formation of (period of Brothers Cyril Macedonian identity? and Methodius) Ilinden Uprising (organized 8.7% 18.2% 12.0% 18.2% revolt against the Ottoman Empire 1903) Partisan period of WWII 13.0% 18.2% 12.0% SFR Yugoslavia 32.6% 22.7% 20.0% 45.5% Independence (1991- 8.7% 18.2% 20.0% 13.6% present) Bucharest agreement (1913) I don’t know 15.2% 4.0% No answer 4.3% They are all important 4.5% The end of the 19century Total 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Ethnicity Total Refuse to answer According to you which was the Antiquity 5.8% most important
    [Show full text]
  • A THREAT to "STABILITY" Human Rights Violations in Macedonia
    Macedoni Page 1 of 10 A THREAT TO "STABILITY" Human Rights Violations in Macedonia Human Rights Watch/Helsinki Human Rights Watch Copyright © June 1996 by Human Rights Watch. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. ISBN: 1-56432-170-3 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 96-77111 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This report was researched and written by Fred Abrahams, a consultant to Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. It is based primarily on a mission to Macedonia conducted in July and August 1995. During that time, Human Rights Watch/Helsinki spoke with dozens of people from all ethnic groups and political persuasions. Extensive interviews were conducted throughout the country with members of government, leaders of the ethnic communities, human rights activists, diplomats, journalists, lawyers, prison inmates and students. The report was edited by Jeri Laber, Senior Advisor to Human Rights Watch/Helsinki. Anne Kuper provided production assistance. Human Rights Watch/Helsinki would like to thank the many people in Macedonia and elsewhere who assisted in the preparation of this report, especially those who took the time to read early drafts. Thanks also go to those members of the Macedonian government who helped by organizing a prison visit, providing information or granting lengthy interviews. I. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS Macedonia faces difficulties on several fronts. As a former member of the Yugoslav federation, the young republic is in a transition from communism in which it must decentralize its economy, construct democratic institutions and revitalize its civil society. These tasks, demanding under any circumstances, have been made more difficult by Macedonia's proximity to the war in Bosnia.
    [Show full text]
  • Bosnia to War, to Dayton, and to Its Slow Peace – European Council On
    REPORT BOSNIA TO WAR, TO DAYTON, AND TO ITS SLOW PEACE Carl Bildt January 2021 SUMMARY The international community was gravely unprepared for the conflicts that followed the dissolution of Yugoslavia. In particular, it neglected the challenge of Bosnia. Europe alone was not enough to bring peace, and the United States went from disinterested to disruptive and finally to decisive for a credible peace process. Russia in those days was a constructive actor. The war in Bosnia lasted years longer than it should have more because of the divisions between outside powers than because of the divisions within the country and the region itself. The fundamentals of the Dayton Agreement in 1995 were not too dissimilar from what had been discussed, but not pursued, prior to the outbreak of the war. It is a solution that is closer to the reality of Belgium than to the reality of Cyprus. After the war, many political leaders in Bosnia saw peace as the continuation of the war by other means, which has seriously hampered economic and social progress. Ultimately, it will be difficult to sustain progress for Bosnia or the region without a credible and clear EU accession process. INTRODUCTION It was a quarter of a century ago that the most painful conflict on European soil since the second world war came to an end. Peace agreements are rare birds. Most conflicts end either with the victory of one of the sides or some sort of ceasefire that is rarely followed by a true peace agreement. The map of Europe shows a number of such ‘frozen conflicts’.
    [Show full text]
  • 'International Community' and the Limits of External Intervention
    Issue 2 November 2016 SOUTHEASTERN EUROPE ‘International community’ and the limits of external intervention ZAGREB SARAJEVO BEOGRAD Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung Fostering democracy and upholding human rights, taking action to prevent the destruction of the global ecosystem, advancing equality between women and men, securing peace through conflict prevention in crisis zones, and defending the freedom of individuals against excessive state and economic power – these are the objectives that drive the ideas and actions of the Heinrich Böll Foundation. We maintain close ties to the German Green Party (Alliance 90/The Greens) and as a think tank for green visions and projects, we are part of an international net work encompassing well over 100 partner projects in approxi mately 60 countries. The Heinrich Böll Foundation works independently and nurtures a spirit of intellectual openness. We maintain a world wide network with currently 30 international offices. Our work in Bosnia and Herzegovina concentrates on the democratization process, political education, and environmental protection and sustainable development. We support and open public fora about topical and marginalized social-political issues and we enable networking of local and international actors close to the Green values. Contents 2 Introductory note Srđan Dvornik Aiding Democracy from Abroad 4 Talking the Talk and Walking the "Unlocked Path" Walk: EU, BiH and the Quality of Democracy Tijana Cvjetićanin 9 The Macedonian Political Crisis – EU Mechanisms Tested Malinka Ristevska Jordanova
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Historical Events in Greek Occupied Macedonia Part 3
    Analysis of historical events in Greek occupied Macedonia Part 3 An interview with Risto Stefov Analysis of historical events in Greek occupied Macedonia An interview with Risto Stefov Part 3 Published by: Risto Stefov Publications [email protected] Toronto, Canada All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without written consent from the author, except for the inclusion of brief and documented quotations in a review. Copyright 2018 by Risto Stefov e-book edition *** April 12, 2018 *** 2 INTERVIEWER – In this interview I would like to ask you some questions about your family and verify some of the things your dad and uncle had said to me in their interviews. Was your grandfather Risto involved in the Illinden Uprising? I remember seeing a photo on someone’s wall. What can you tell me about his life in the village? RISTO – My grandfather Risto was not involved in the Ilinden Uprising because, from what my father had told me, he was not in Macedonia. He was on pechalba (migrant work) but I don’t know where and for how long. He purchased a rifle and wanted to return but the borders were shut and he could not come back in time. He did come back later and brought the rifle with him and gave it to his oldest son Lazo who then used it during the German-Italian- Bulgarian occupation when he was a partisan for a brief period of time before he died in 1943.
    [Show full text]
  • The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: the Macedonian Question—Resolved?
    Nationalities Papers (2020), 48: 2, 205–214 doi:10.1017/nps.2020.10 ANALYSIS OF CURRENT EVENTS The Macedonian “Name” Dispute: The Macedonian Question—Resolved? Matthew Nimetz* Former Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General of the United Nations and former Special Envoy of President Bill Clinton, New York, USA *Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Abstract The dispute between Greece and the newly formed state referred to as the “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” that emerged out of the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991 was a major source of instability in the Western Balkans for more than 25 years. It was resolved through negotiations between Athens and Skopje, mediated by the United Nations, resulting in the Prespa (or Prespes) Agreement, which was signed on June 17, 2018, and ratified by both parliaments amid controversy in their countries. The underlying issues involved deeply held and differing views relating to national identity, history, and the future of the region, which were resolved through a change in the name of the new state and various agreements as to identity issues. The author, the United Nations mediator in the dispute for 20 years and previously the United States presidential envoy with reference to the dispute, describes the basis of the dispute, the positions of the parties, and the factors that led to a successful resolution. Keywords: Macedonia; Greece; North Macedonia; “Name” dispute The Macedonian “name” dispute was, to most outsiders who somehow were faced with trying to understand it, certainly one of the more unusual international confrontations. When the dispute was resolved through the Prespa Agreement between Greece and (now) the Republic of North Macedonia in June 2018, most outsiders (as frequently expressed to me, the United Nations mediator for 20 years) responded, “Why did it take you so long?” And yet, as protracted conflicts go, the Macedonian “name” dispute is instructive as to the types of issues that go to the heart of a people’s identity and a nation’s sense of security.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonia: Gearing up for Presidential Elections
    MACEDONIA: GEARING UP FOR PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS ICG Balkans Report N°77 Skopje, 18 October 1999 Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 1 II. THE MACEDONIAN PRESIDENT................................................................................ 1 A. Rights and Duties of the President ........................................................................ 1 B. How the President is Elected ................................................................................. 2 III. THE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATES…........................................................................ 3 A. Parties Fail to Agree on Joint Candidates.............................................................. 4 B. The Six Presidential Hopefuls................................................................................ 4 IV. …AND THEIR CHANCES ............................................................................................ 7 Individual Candidates ................................................................................................... 8 V. CONTROVERSIAL CHANGES TO THE STATE ELECTORAL COMMISSION ......... 10 VI. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION DEEPENS RIFT WITHIN RULING COALITION…........ 11 VII. …AS RELATIONS BETWEEN MACEDONIA AND KFOR ALSO UNDERGO CRISIS.................................................................................................... 13 VIII. CONCLUSION ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • CONGRESSIONAL RECORD— Extensions Of
    E234 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — Extensions of Remarks February 25, 2014 wife Rhonda, also a graduate of Evangel, On March 11, 2004, the House of Rep- ented wrestlers from Katy to qualify for the have three grown children—Sarah, Jon, and resentatives passed H. Res. 540 expressing state tournament. David—and six grandchildren. the deepest sympathies and solidarity of the William is a repeat state champion, finishing Coach Jenkins’ exemplary devotion to American people to the Macedonian people. his senior year with an impressive record of coaching is only matched by his devotion in As a tribute to President Trajkovski, then- 51–3. He went undefeated at this year’s state the classroom, his love of his family, and his President Bush and then-Secretary Powell tournament, pinning all four of his opponents strength in his faith. The Springfield commu- recognized Macedonia under its constitutional to capture the gold in the 126 lb. division. nity is justifiably proud of Coach Jenkins and name Republic of Macedonia, on November 4, Texas is home to many outstanding ath- the Evangel basketball program. I urge my 2004. letes, and becoming a state champion is not colleagues to join me in congratulating him on President Trajkovski’s legacy remains today. an easy feat. Becoming one twice is extraor- his well-deserved victory. His wife Vilma has dedicated her life to work- dinary. On behalf of all residents of the Twen- f ing to continue his work in bridging youth of all ty-Second Congressional District of Texas, I am honored to recognize William’s accom- HONORING BORIS TRAJKOVSKI ethnic groups, promoting peace and dialogue, and religious freedom among all, and she is a plishment! Our community is proud of William tireless advocate for breast cancer research.
    [Show full text]
  • Macedonian Diplomatic Bulletin
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MDB No.130 / 131 MDB No.130 2018 July / August MACEDONIAN DIPLOMATIC BULLETIN PRIME MINISTER ZAEV RECEIVED NATO MEMBERSHIP INVITATION FROM SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG PAGE 2 IN FOCUS DIPLOMATIC NOTEBOOK PRIME MINISTER ZAEV RECEIVED TELEPHONE CONVERSATION ZAEV-PENCE NATO MEMBERSHIP INVITATION FROM PAGE 3 SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG MEETING BETWEEN FOREIGN MINISTER DIMITROV AND PAGE 2 US STATE SECRETARY POMPEO PAGE 17 MEETINGS OF DEPUTY FOREIGN MINISTER ZHERNOVSKI AT THE WHITE HOUSE, US CONGRESS AND THE US ATLANTIC COUNCIL PAGE 16 DIPLOMATIC NOTEBOOK MDB PRIME MINISTER ZAEV RECEIVED Macedonian Diplomatic Bulletin was NATO MEMBERSHIP INVITATION FROM founded in October 2006 by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia. SECRETARY GENERAL STOLTENBERG russels, 12 July 2018 - NATO Secretary General Stoltenberg stressed that Bthe citizens of the Republic of Macedonia should accept today’s big day as a day that deserves to be celebrated, and that this invitation is a result of ful- filled conditions and NATO standards, as well as of the historic agreement for strategic partnership and solution of the Macedonian-Greek name difference. Filip II Makedonski 7, 1000 Skopje At the joint press conference, the Prime Minister of the Republic of Mace- Republic of Macedonia donia, Zoran Zaev, said that this was a historic day for our country and that he, the Government of the Republic of Macedonia and the citizens were grateful www.mfa.gov.mk for the decision of our Allies to start the process of fully-fledged membership [email protected] of the Alliance.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplomatic News in Focus
    MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF THE REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA MDB No. 111 MACEDONIAN DIPLOMATIC BULLETIN AUSTRIAN FOREIGN MINISTER SEBASTIAN KURZ VISITS MACEDONIA IN FOCUS diPLomaTic neWS Vienna MIGRATion ConFERence PACE DELEGATion VISITS Macedonia PAGE 5 INTERVIEW: H.E. MS. SRI ASTARI RaSJid, AMBASSadoR OF The RePUBLic OF IndoneSia TO The RePUBLic OF Macedonia ER 2016 PAGE 10/11 mb mounTain BeLASica WaTERFALLS – OVE N UniQue NATURAL BeauTY PAGE 4 PAGE 14/15 DIPLOMATIC NEWS MDB PRESIDENT GJORGE IVanOV PaYS Macedonian Diplomatic Bulletin was WORKING VISIT TO REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA founded in October 2006 by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Macedonia. he President of the Republic of Macedonia, Gjorge Ivanov, paid a working visit to the TRepublic of Bulgaria on 21–22 November. During the visit, he met with his Bulgarian counterpart, Rosen Plevneliev, and the President-elect of the Republic of Bulgaria, Rumen Radev. Overall bilateral relations and possibilities to further bilateral and regional cooperation Filip II Makedonski 7, 1000 Skopje were discussed at the meetings. At a ceremony at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BAN), Republic of Macedonia President Ivanov was awarded an honorary doctorate degree. On this occasion, he delivered a lecture titled “Migrations and Migrants: Challenges for the Third Millennium”. www.mfa.gov.mk [email protected] Editor: Vladimir Efremovski Editorial Board: Zuko Rizvanski, Shaban Jashari, Katerina Stavreska, and Sejfullah Shaqiri Adviser: Goce Georgievski Photo: Ljupco Blagoevski Published monthly by: Macedonian Information Centre Director: Dragan Antonov Chief Translator: Aleksandra Ilievska PRESIDENT GJORGE IVanOV ATTEndS MARRAKECH CLImaTE CHanGE CONFERENCE he President of the Republic of TMacedonia, Gjorge Ivanov, paid a working visit to the Kingdom of Naum Naumovski Borce 73, Morocco on 15–17 November to attend 1000 Skopje, Republic of Macedonia the UN Climate Change Conference in www.micnews.com.mk Marrakech.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Elections in the Republic of Macedonia 2014 - Results, Campaign, Findings
    [email protected] [email protected] F F E D A B O C : C I B F F E D A B O C : C I B Telefax: +389 (2) 3135 290 290 3135 (2) +389 Telefax: Telefax: +389 (2) 3135 290 290 3135 (2) +389 Telefax: 0 0 3 4 3 6 0 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 8 3 4 6 E D : N A B I 0 0 3 4 3 6 0 1 1 0 7 0 0 0 4 0 8 3 4 6 E D : N A B I Telefon: +389 (2) 3231 122 122 3231 (2) +389 Telefon: Telefon: +389 (2) 3231 122 122 3231 (2) +389 Telefon: 7 0 0 0 4 0 8 3 Z L B 7 0 0 0 4 0 8 3 Z L B Telefon: +381 (0) 38 229 874 229 38 (0) +381 Telefon: Telefon: +381 (0) 38 229 874 229 38 (0) +381 Telefon: 3 4 3 6 0 1 1 . r N - . o t K 3 4 3 6 0 1 1 . r N - . o t K Republic of Kosovo Kosovo of Republic Republic of Kosovo Kosovo of Republic n n o B G A k n a b z r e m m o C n n o B G A k n a b z r e m m o C 10 000 Pristina Pristina 000 10 10 000 Pristina Pristina 000 10 Boulevard Mother Theresa 46/5 Theresa Mother Boulevard Boulevard Mother Theresa 46/5 Theresa Mother Boulevard e d .
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2000
    United Nations A/55/411 General Assembly Distr.: General 22 September 2000 Original: English Fifty-fifth session Agenda items 45, 57 and 78 The situation in Bosnia and Herzegovina Implementation of the resolutions of the United Nations Strengthening of security and cooperation in the Mediterranean region Letter dated 21 September 2000 from the Permanent Representatives of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General* Upon the instructions of our respective Governments, we have the honour to forward herewith a joint statement by the Heads of our respective States, issued following their meeting held in New York on 8 September 2000 (see annex). Our Heads of State reiterated their firm commitment towards lasting peace and stability in the region, an integral part of which represents the resolution of all aspects of the issue of succession to the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, including the status of that State and all its successors in the United Nations, on the basis of the principle of equality of all successor States. We should like to request your kind assistance in circulating the present letter as a document of the General Assembly, under agenda items 45, 57 and 78. (Signed) Muhamed Sacirbey Ambassador Permanent Representative of Bosnia and Herzegovina (Signed) Ivan Šimonović Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Croatia * Also issued as document S/2000/897. 00-65644 (E) 270900 ````````` A/55/411 (Signed) Naste Čalovski Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Macedonia (Signed) Ernest Petrič Ambassador Permanent Representative of the Republic of Slovenia 2 A/55/411 Annex to the letter dated 21 September 2000 from the Permanent Representatives of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Slovenia and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia to the United Nations addressed to the President of the Secretary-General Joint statement by the President of the Presidency of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Mr.
    [Show full text]