DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix: Engine Data Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix: Engine Data Tables Appendix: Engine Data Tables Piston T. Bose, Airbreathing Propulsion: An Introduction, 267 Springer Aerospace Technology, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4614-3532-7, # Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012 268 Otto/ No. Take- Spec. fuel Volume diesel, of Cyl. Stroke Displ. off R.P.M. Weight consumption compression No. of Country Company Model No. Cyl. Dia. length Vol. power (k-rpm) (KG) (mu-g/J) ratio stroke Remarks CZ AVIA M337 6 105 115 5.97 170 2.6 148 72.7 6.3 O4 INV INLINE CZ AVIA MINR6111 6 5.97 125 2.3 127 83.1 O4 CZ AVIA M137 6 105 115 5.97 140 2.6 137 77.4 6.3 O4 CZ AVIA M332 4 105 101 3.98 100 2.4 102 77.4 6.3 O4 CZ AVIA M462 9 105 130 10.16 190 1.9 83.1 6.4 O4 FR RECTIM 4AR1200 4 40 3.6 61 7 O4 USES VW ENGINE FR RECTIM 4AR1600 4 61 3.6 64 8 O4 USES VW ENGINE DE BMW HORNET 9 156 162 27.5 335 1.8 350 82 5 O4 DE JUNKER JUMO205E 6 105 160 16.6 447 2 521 59.6 8.2 D4 DIESEL DE LIMBAC SL1700E 4 88 69 1.68 61 3.2 73 8 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED DE PIEPER STAM1500 4 1.5 45 60 O4 MODIFIED VW DE PULCH 003A 6 90 70 2.7 150 5 110 O4 RADIAL DE PULCH 003B 6 94 70 2.9 180 5.5 120 O4 RADIAL PL JANWSK SAT500 2 70 65 0.5 25 4 27 111.5 8.5 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED PL BORZEC 2RB 4 70 35 0.54 16 4.5 15 126.7 7.2 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED PL WSKPZL AI14RA 9 105 130 10.16 132 1.7 197 76.4 5.9 O4 INLINE RADIAL PL PZLRZE PZL-3S 7 155.5 155 20.6 550 2.1 411 105 6.4 O4 RADIAL PL WSKPZL ASZ62IR 9 155.5 29.87 611 2.1 579 110 6.4 O4 PL PZLFRA 2A-120C 2 117.5 88.9 1.91 60 3.2 75 8.5 O4 HORIZ Appendix OPPOSED PL PZLFRA 4A-235B 4 117.5 88.9 3.85 125 2.8 118 8.5 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED Otto/ No. Take- Spec. fuel Volume diesel, of Cyl. Stroke Displ. off R.P.M. Weight consumption compression No. of Country Company Model No. Cyl. Dia. length Vol. power (k-rpm) (KG) (mu-g/J) ratio stroke Remarks Appendix PL PZLFRA 6A-350C 6 117.5 88.9 5.74 220 2.8 167 10.5 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED PL PZLFRA 6AS-350A 6 117.5 88.9 5.74 250 2.8 189 7.4 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED PL PZLFRA 6A-350D 6 117.5 88.9 5.74 235 3.2 145 10.5 O4 HORIZ OPP HELE E PL PZLFRA 6V-350B 6 117.5 88.9 5.74 235 3.2 144 10.5 O4 VERT OPPO- HELE E RU ASH ASH-62M 9 155.5 29.87 738 2 567 71.5 6.4 O4 Superch. RU ASH ASH-82T 14 155.5 155 41.2 1,630 2.4 1,020 6.9 O4 RU ASH ASH-82V 14 155.5 155 41.2 1,530 2.4 1,070 O4 RU IVCHEN AI-14RT 9 105 130 10.2 223 2.4 217 74.5 6.2 O4 Superch.,An-14, Yak-18A RU IVCHEN AI-14VF 9 105 130 10.2 208 2.4 242 78.2 6.2 O4 Heli RU IVCHEN AI-26V 9 155.5 150 20.6 428 2.2 450 83.8 6.4 O4 Heli RU VEDEN M14V26 9 105 130 10.2 242 2.8 245 78.2 6.2 O4 Heli,Superch. UK LEONID MAJ755/1 14 122 112 18.3 593 2.9 483 95 6.8 O4 Heli UK LEONID 524/1 9 122 112 11.8 388 3.2 340 83.8 6.5 O4 Heli UK LEONID 531/8 9 122 122 12.8 71 2.6 84 87.6 7 O4 UK ROLASN ARDEMMKX 83 69 1.5 53 3.6 8.5 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED UK ROLASN ARDEMKXI 85.5 69 1.5 55 3.6 72 8.5 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED UK ROLSRO CO0-240A 4 122.5 98.4 3.93 98 2.5 112 71 8.5 O4 HORIZ OPPOSED UK ROLSRO CO10-368 4 133.4 108 6.02 145 136 74.4 8.2 O4 UK ROLSRO CO-O-200 4 103 98 3.3 74 2.7 86 92.8 7 O4 UK ROLSRO CO-O-240 4 112.5 98.4 3.9 97 2.8 97 84.6 8.5 O4 UK ROLSRO CO-O-300 6 103 98 4.9 108 2.7 122 85.7 7 O4 UK WESLAK TYP274-6 2 66 40 0.27 18 6.5 7 186 O4 SIMULT FIRING 269 (continued) 270 Otto/ No. Take- Spec. fuel Volume diesel, of Cyl. Stroke Displ. off R.P.M. Weight consumption compression No. of Country Company Model No. Cyl. Dia. length Vol. power (k-rpm) (KG) (mu-g/J) ratio stroke Remarks UK WESLAK TYPE430 2 40 11 149 O2 2 STROKE UK WESLAK TYPE1527 4 90 60 1.52 71 5.5 45 84.5 O4 UK NAPIER 12 152 187 41.1 2,668 2 1,630 59.6 27 D4 DIESEL US AVLYCO 0-235C 4 111 98.4 3.85 115 2.7 98 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO 0-235H 4 111 98.4 3.85 115 2.6 96 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O-235-L 4 111 98.4 3.85 115 2.7 98 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O290-D2C 4 124 98 4.7 104 2.8 120 78.2 7 O4 US AVLYCO O-320-A 4 130 98.4 5.2 150 2.7 110 7 O4 US AVLYCO O-320-D 4 130 98.4 5.2 160 2.7 114 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO 0-320-E 4 130 98.4 5.2 160 2.7 113 7 O4 US SALYCO O-320-H 4 130 98 5.2 160 2.7 115 9 O4 US AVLYCO AEO320-E 4 130 98.4 5.2 150 2.7 117 7 O4 US AVLYCO O-360-A 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 118 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO LO-360-A 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 120 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O-360-C 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 116 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O-360-E 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 122 9 O4 US AVLVCO LO-360-E 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 122 9 O4 US AVLYCO O-360-F 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 122 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO IV-360-A 4 130 111 5.92 180 2.7 124 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO TO-360-C 4 130 111 5.92 210 2.6 154 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO IO-360-A 4 130 111 5.92 200 2.7 133 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO IO-360-B 4 130 111 5.92 180 122 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO IO-350-C 4 130 111 5.92 200 134 8.7 O4 US AVLYCO HI0360-C 4 130 111 5.92 205 132 8.7 O4 Appendix US AVLYCO HIO360-D 4 130 111 5.92 190 132 10 O4 US AVLYCO HIO360-E 4 130 111,0 5.92 190 132 8 O4 Otto/ No. Take- Spec. fuel Volume diesel, of Cyl. Stroke Displ. off R.P.M. Weight consumption compression No. of Country Company Model No. Cyl. Dia. length Vol. power (k-rpm) (KG) (mu-g/J) ratio stroke Remarks Appendix US AVLYCO TIO360-E 4 130 111,0 5.7 181 2.6 181 84.6 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO AEIO360A 4 130 111 5.92 200 139 8.7 O4 US AVLYCO AEIO360B 4 130 111 5.92 180 125 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO AEIO360H 4 130 111 5.92 180 122 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O-540-B 6 130 111 8.86 235 2.6 166 7.2 O4 US AVLYCO O-540-E 6 130 111 8.86 260 2.7 167 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O-540-G 6 130 111 8.86 260 174 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO O-540-J 6 130 111 8.86 235 2.4 162 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO VO435-23 6 124 98 7.5 194 3.4 181 93.1 7.3 O4 Mil.Heli. US AVLYCO TVO-435 6 124 98 7.5 201 3.2 210 84.6 7.3 O4 Superch. US AVLYCO GO-480 6 124 98 7.9 220 3.4 198 78.2 8.7 O4 Horiz.oop. US AVLYCO IGSO480 6 130 98 7.9 253 3.4 218 81.2 7.9 O4 Horiz.oop. US AVLYCO VO-540-B 6 130 111 8.86 305 3.2 202 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO IGSO540 6 130 111 8.6 283 3.4 241 81.2 7.3 O4 Horiz.opp. US AVLYCO VO-540-C 6 130 111 8.86 305 3.3 200 8.7 O4 US AVLYCO IO-540-C 6 130 111 8.86 250 2.6 170 8.7 O4 US AVLYCO IO-540-E 6 130 111 8.86 290 2.6 187 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO IO-540-K 6 130 111 8.86 300 2.7 201 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO IO-540-S 6 130 111 8.86 300 2.7 201 8.7 O4 US AVLYCO IO-540-T 6 130 111 8.86 260 2.7 171 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO AEIO540D 6 130 111 8.86 260 2.7 174 8.5 O4 US AVLYCO TIO540-A 6 130 111 8.86 310 2.7 232 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO TIO540-C 6 130 111 8.86 250 2.6 205 7.2 O4 US AVLYCO TIO540-F 6 130 111 8.86 325 2.6 233 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO LTIO540F 6 130 111 8.86 325 2.6 233 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO TIO540-J 6 130 111 8.86 350 2.6 235 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO LTIO540J 6 130 111 8.86 350 2.6 235 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO TIO540-R 6 130 111 8.86 350 2.5 238 7.3 O4 US AVLYCO TIO540-S 6 130 111 8.86 300 2.7 228 7.3 O4 271 (continued) 272 Otto/ No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerospace Engine Data
    AEROSPACE ENGINE DATA Data for some concrete aerospace engines and their craft ................................................................................. 1 Data on rocket-engine types and comparison with large turbofans ................................................................... 1 Data on some large airliner engines ................................................................................................................... 2 Data on other aircraft engines and manufacturers .......................................................................................... 3 In this Appendix common to Aircraft propulsion and Space propulsion, data for thrust, weight, and specific fuel consumption, are presented for some different types of engines (Table 1), with some values of specific impulse and exit speed (Table 2), a plot of Mach number and specific impulse characteristic of different engine types (Fig. 1), and detailed characteristics of some modern turbofan engines, used in large airplanes (Table 3). DATA FOR SOME CONCRETE AEROSPACE ENGINES AND THEIR CRAFT Table 1. Thrust to weight ratio (F/W), for engines and their crafts, at take-off*, specific fuel consumption (TSFC), and initial and final mass of craft (intermediate values appear in [kN] when forces, and in tonnes [t] when masses). Engine Engine TSFC Whole craft Whole craft Whole craft mass, type thrust/weight (g/s)/kN type thrust/weight mini/mfin Trent 900 350/63=5.5 15.5 A380 4×350/5600=0.25 560/330=1.8 cruise 90/63=1.4 cruise 4×90/5000=0.1 CFM56-5A 110/23=4.8 16
    [Show full text]
  • Noise Reduction Technologies for Turbofan Engines
    NASA/TM—2007-214495 Noise Reduction Technologies for Turbofan Engines Dennis L. Huff Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio September 2007 NASA STI Program . in Profile Since its founding, NASA has been dedicated to the • CONFERENCE PUBLICATION. Collected advancement of aeronautics and space science. The papers from scientific and technical NASA Scientific and Technical Information (STI) conferences, symposia, seminars, or other program plays a key part in helping NASA maintain meetings sponsored or cosponsored by NASA. this important role. • SPECIAL PUBLICATION. Scientific, The NASA STI Program operates under the auspices technical, or historical information from of the Agency Chief Information Officer. It collects, NASA programs, projects, and missions, often organizes, provides for archiving, and disseminates concerned with subjects having substantial NASA’s STI. The NASA STI program provides access public interest. to the NASA Aeronautics and Space Database and its public interface, the NASA Technical Reports Server, • TECHNICAL TRANSLATION. English- thus providing one of the largest collections of language translations of foreign scientific and aeronautical and space science STI in the world. technical material pertinent to NASA’s mission. Results are published in both non-NASA channels and by NASA in the NASA STI Report Series, which Specialized services also include creating custom includes the following report types: thesauri, building customized databases, organizing and publishing research results. • TECHNICAL PUBLICATION. Reports of completed research or a major significant phase For more information about the NASA STI of research that present the results of NASA program, see the following: programs and include extensive data or theoretical analysis. Includes compilations of significant • Access the NASA STI program home page at scientific and technical data and information http://www.sti.nasa.gov deemed to be of continuing reference value.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Combustor-Noise Models – AIAA 2012-2087
    A Comparison of Combustor-Noise Models – AIAA 2012-2087 Lennart S. Hultgren, NASA Glenn Research Center, Cleveland, OH 44135 Summary The present status of combustor-noise prediction in the NASA Aircraft Noise Prediction Program (ANOPP)1 for current- generation (N) turbofan engines is summarized. Several semi-empirical models for turbofan combustor noise are discussed, including best methods for near-term updates to ANOPP. An alternate turbine-transmission factor2 will appear as a user selectable option in the combustor-noise module GECOR in the next release. The three-spectrum model proposed by Stone et al.3 for GE turbofan-engine combustor noise is discussed and compared with ANOPP predictions for several relevant cases. Based on the results presented herein and in their report,3 it is recommended that the application of this fully empirical combustor-noise prediction method be limited to situations involving only General-Electric turbofan engines. Long-term needs and challenges for the N+1 through N+3 time frame are discussed. Because the impact of other propulsion-noise sources continues to be reduced due to turbofan design trends, advances in noise-mitigation techniques, and expected aircraft configuration changes, the relative importance of core noise is expected to greatly increase in the future. The noise-source structure in the combustor, including the indirect one, and the effects of the propagation path through the engine and exhaust nozzle need to be better understood. In particular, the acoustic consequences of the expected trends toward smaller, highly efficient gas- generator cores and low-emission fuel-flexible combustors need to be fully investigated since future designs are quite likely to fall outside of the parameter space of existing (semi-empirical) prediction tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Helicopter Turboshaft Engines
    Comparison of Helicopter Turboshaft Engines John Schenderlein1, and Tyler Clayton2 University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80304 Although they garnish less attention than their flashy jet cousins, turboshaft engines hold a specialized niche in the aviation industry. Built to be compact, efficient, and powerful, turboshafts have made modern helicopters and the feats they accomplish possible. First implemented in the 1950s, turboshaft geometry has gone largely unchanged, but advances in materials and axial flow technology have continued to drive higher power and efficiency from today's turboshafts. Similarly to the turbojet and fan industry, there are only a handful of big players in the market. The usual suspects - Pratt & Whitney, General Electric, and Rolls-Royce - have taken over most of the industry, but lesser known companies like Lycoming and Turbomeca still hold a footing in the Turboshaft world. Nomenclature shp = Shaft Horsepower SFC = Specific Fuel Consumption FPT = Free Power Turbine HPT = High Power Turbine Introduction & Background Turboshaft engines are very similar to a turboprop engine; in fact many turboshaft engines were created by modifying existing turboprop engines to fit the needs of the rotorcraft they propel. The most common use of turboshaft engines is in scenarios where high power and reliability are required within a small envelope of requirements for size and weight. Most helicopter, marine, and auxiliary power units applications take advantage of turboshaft configurations. In fact, the turboshaft plays a workhorse role in the aviation industry as much as it is does for industrial power generation. While conventional turbine jet propulsion is achieved through thrust generated by a hot and fast exhaust stream, turboshaft engines creates shaft power that drives one or more rotors on the vehicle.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Chemical-Nuclear Propulsion MAE 342 2016
    2/12/20 Chemical/Nuclear Propulsion Space System Design, MAE 342, Princeton University Robert Stengel • Thermal rockets • Performance parameters • Propellants and propellant storage Copyright 2016 by Robert Stengel. All rights reserved. For educational use only. http://www.princeton.edu/~stengel/MAE342.html 1 1 Chemical (Thermal) Rockets • Liquid/Gas Propellant –Monopropellant • Cold gas • Catalytic decomposition –Bipropellant • Separate oxidizer and fuel • Hypergolic (spontaneous) • Solid Propellant ignition –Mixed oxidizer and fuel • External ignition –External ignition • Storage –Burn to completion – Ambient temperature and pressure • Hybrid Propellant – Cryogenic –Liquid oxidizer, solid fuel – Pressurized tank –Throttlable –Throttlable –Start/stop cycling –Start/stop cycling 2 2 1 2/12/20 Cold Gas Thruster (used with inert gas) Moog Divert/Attitude Thruster and Valve 3 3 Monopropellant Hydrazine Thruster Aerojet Rocketdyne • Catalytic decomposition produces thrust • Reliable • Low performance • Toxic 4 4 2 2/12/20 Bi-Propellant Rocket Motor Thrust / Motor Weight ~ 70:1 5 5 Hypergolic, Storable Liquid- Propellant Thruster Titan 2 • Spontaneous combustion • Reliable • Corrosive, toxic 6 6 3 2/12/20 Pressure-Fed and Turbopump Engine Cycles Pressure-Fed Gas-Generator Rocket Rocket Cycle Cycle, with Nozzle Cooling 7 7 Staged Combustion Engine Cycles Staged Combustion Full-Flow Staged Rocket Cycle Combustion Rocket Cycle 8 8 4 2/12/20 German V-2 Rocket Motor, Fuel Injectors, and Turbopump 9 9 Combustion Chamber Injectors 10 10 5 2/12/20
    [Show full text]
  • Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in HTPB/Ammonium Nitrate Mixed
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Plan B and other Reports Graduate Studies 12-2016 Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in TPB/H Ammonium Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems Jacob Ward Forsyth Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports Part of the Propulsion and Power Commons Recommended Citation Forsyth, Jacob Ward, "Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in TPB/AmmoniumH Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems" (2016). All Graduate Plan B and other Reports. 876. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/gradreports/876 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Plan B and other Reports by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ENHANCEMENT OF VOLUMETRIC SPECIFIC IMPULSE IN HTPB/AMMONIUM NITRATE MIXED HYBRID ROCKET SYSTEMS by Jacob W. Forsyth A report submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Aerospace Engineering Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Stephen A. Whitmore Ph.D. David Geller Ph.D. Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ Rees Fullmer Ph.D. Committee Member UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2016 ii Copyright © Jacob W. Forsyth 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Enhancement of Volumetric Specific Impulse in HTPB/Ammonium Nitrate Mixed Hybrid Rocket Systems by Jacob W. Forsyth, Master of Science Utah State University, 2016 Major Professor: Dr. Stephen A. Whitmore Department: Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Hybrid rocket systems are safer and have higher specific impulse than solid rockets. However, due to large oxidizer tanks and low regression rates, hybrid rockets have low volumetric efficiency and very long longitudinal profiles, which limit many of the applications for which hybrids can be used.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. Afterburners
    2. AFTERBURNERS 2.1 Introduction The simple gas turbine cycle can be designed to have good performance characteristics at a particular operating or design point. However, a particu­ lar engine does not have the capability of producing a good performance for large ranges of thrust, an inflexibility that can lead to problems when the flight program for a particular vehicle is considered. For example, many airplanes require a larger thrust during takeoff and acceleration than they do at a cruise condition. Thus, if the engine is sized for takeoff and has its design point at this condition, the engine will be too large at cruise. The vehicle performance will be penalized at cruise for the poor off-design point operation of the engine components and for the larger weight of the engine. Similar problems arise when supersonic cruise vehicles are considered. The afterburning gas turbine cycle was an early attempt to avoid some of these problems. Afterburners or augmentation devices were first added to aircraft gas turbine engines to increase their thrust during takeoff or brief periods of acceleration and supersonic flight. The devices make use of the fact that, in a gas turbine engine, the maximum gas temperature at the turbine inlet is limited by structural considerations to values less than half the adiabatic flame temperature at the stoichiometric fuel-air ratio. As a result, the gas leaving the turbine contains most of its original concentration of oxygen. This oxygen can be burned with additional fuel in a secondary combustion chamber located downstream of the turbine where temperature constraints are relaxed.
    [Show full text]
  • Helicopter Turboshafts
    Helicopter Turboshafts Luke Stuyvenberg University of Colorado at Boulder Department of Aerospace Engineering The application of gas turbine engines in helicopters is discussed. The work- ings of turboshafts and the history of their use in helicopters is briefly described. Ideal cycle analyses of the Boeing 502-14 and of the General Electric T64 turboshaft engine are performed. I. Introduction to Turboshafts Turboshafts are an adaptation of gas turbine technology in which the principle output is shaft power from the expansion of hot gas through the turbine, rather than thrust from the exhaust of these gases. They have found a wide variety of applications ranging from air compression to auxiliary power generation to racing boat propulsion and more. This paper, however, will focus primarily on the application of turboshaft technology to providing main power for helicopters, to achieve extended vertical flight. II. Relationship to Turbojets As a variation of the gas turbine, turboshafts are very similar to turbojets. The operating principle is identical: atmospheric gases are ingested at the inlet, compressed, mixed with fuel and combusted, then expanded through a turbine which powers the compressor. There are two key diferences which separate turboshafts from turbojets, however. Figure 1. Basic Turboshaft Operation Note the absence of a mechanical connection between the HPT and LPT. An ideal turboshaft extracts with the HPT only the power necessary to turn the compressor, and with the LPT all remaining power from the expansion process. 1 of 10 American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics A. Emphasis on Shaft Power Unlike turbojets, the primary purpose of which is to produce thrust from the expanded gases, turboshafts are intended to extract shaft horsepower (shp).
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigation of the Performance Potential of A
    AN INVESTIGATION OF THE PERFORMANCE POTENTIAL OF A LIQUID OXYGEN EXPANDER CYCLE ROCKET ENGINE by DYLAN THOMAS STAPP RICHARD D. BRANAM, COMMITTEE CHAIR SEMIH M. OLCMEN AJAY K. AGRAWAL A THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the Department of Aerospace Engineering and Mechanics in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2016 Copyright Dylan Thomas Stapp 2016 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT This research effort sought to examine the performance potential of a dual-expander cycle liquid oxygen-hydrogen engine with a conventional bell nozzle geometry. The analysis was performed using the NASA Numerical Propulsion System Simulation (NPSS) software to develop a full steady-state model of the engine concept. Validation for the theoretical engine model was completed using the same methodology to build a steady-state model of an RL10A-3- 3A single expander cycle rocket engine with corroborating data from a similar modeling project performed at the NASA Glenn Research Center. Previous research performed at NASA and the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) has identified the potential of dual-expander cycle technology to specifically improve the efficiency and capability of upper-stage liquid rocket engines. Dual-expander cycles also eliminate critical failure modes and design limitations present for single-expander cycle engines. This research seeks to identify potential LOX Expander Cycle (LEC) engine designs that exceed the performance of the current state of the art RL10B-2 engine flown on Centaur upper-stages. Results of this research found that the LEC engine concept achieved a 21.2% increase in engine thrust with a decrease in engine length and diameter of 52.0% and 15.8% respectively compared to the RL10B-2 engine.
    [Show full text]
  • F404 Turbofan Engines 17,700-19,000 Lb Thrust Range
    www.ge.com/aviation F404 turbofan engines 17,700-19,000 lb thrust range The F404 family of engines powers a broad spectrum afterburner sections result in increased performance of aircraft with missions ranging from low-level subsonic while maintaining the F404’s characteristic durability. attack to high-altitude interception. The first version of Its simple, modular design is reliable and easy to the F404 was developed to power the Boeing F/A-18, maintain. and non-afterburning derivatives powered the F-117A The F404/RM12 is a derivative developed in conjunction Stealth Fighter and the Singapore A4-SU Super Skyhawk. with Volvo Aero Corporation to power the Saab Gripen, Developed for the Korean KAI/LMTAS T-50 advanced a multi-role fighter, attack and reconnaissance aircraft. trainer/light fighter, the F404-GE-102 is the latest The F404/RM12 model also includes single-engine safety derivative of the F404 family. It includes single-engine features and a FADEC. safety features and a Full Authority Digital Electronic The F404-GE-IN20 engine is an enhanced production Control (FADEC) derived from GE’s F414 engine. The version of the F404, which is successfully powering F404-GE-102 is supplied to ROKAF by Samsung Techwin India’s Light Combat Aircraft MKI. The highest thrust under a licensed production program with GE. variant of the F404 family, the F404-GE-IN20 The F404-GE-402 provides higher power, improved incorporates GE’s latest hot section materials and fuel efficiency and increased mission capability for the technologies, as well as a FADEC for reliable power and combat-proven Boeing F/A-18C/D Hornet.
    [Show full text]
  • Propulsione Aeronautica 2020/2021 Francesco Barato
    PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA 2020/2021 FRANCESCO BARATO MATERIALE DI SUPPORTO FONDAMENTI DI PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA Thrust 푇 = (푚̇ 푎 + 푚̇ 푓)푉푒 − 푚̇ 푎푉0 + (푝푒 − 푝푎)퐴푒 푇 ≈ 푚̇ 푎(푉푒 − 푉0) + (푝푒 − 푝푎)퐴푒 1 PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA 2020/2021 FRANCESCO BARATO Ramjet P-270 Moskit (left), BrahMos (right) Turboramjet Pratt & Whitney J-58 turbo(ram)jet 2 PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA 2020/2021 FRANCESCO BARATO Scramjet 3 PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA 2020/2021 FRANCESCO BARATO Specific impulse 푇 푉푒 푇 푚̇ 푝 푉푒 − 푉0 퐼푠푝 = = [푠] 푟표푐푘푒푡푠 퐼푠푝 = = [푠] 푎푟 푏푟푒푎푡ℎ푛푔 푚̇ 푝푔0 푔0 푚̇ 푓푔0 푚̇ 푓 푔0 4 PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA 2020/2021 FRANCESCO BARATO Propulsive efficiency Overall efficiency Overall efficiency with Mach number 5 PROPULSIONE AERONAUTICA 2020/2021 FRANCESCO BARATO Engine bypass ratios Bypass Engine Name Major applications ratio turbojet early jet aircraft, Concorde 0.0 SNECMA M88 Rafale 0.30 GE F404 F/A-18, T-50, F-117 0.34 PW F100 F-16, F-15 0.36 Eurojet EJ200 Typhoon 0.4 Klimov RD-33 MiG-29, Il-102 0.49 Saturn AL-31 Su-27, Su-30, J-10 0.59 Kuznetsov NK-144A Tu-144 0.6 PW JT8D DC-9, MD-80, 727, 737 Original 0.96 Soloviev D-20P Tu-124 1.0 Kuznetsov NK-321 Tu-160 1.4 GE Honda HF120 HondaJet 2.9 RR Tay Gulfstream IV, F70, F100 3.1 GE CF6-50 A300, DC-10-30,Lockheed C-5M Super Galaxy 4.26 PowerJet SaM146 SSJ 100 4.43 RR RB211-22B TriStar 4.8 PW PW4000-94 A300, A310, Boeing 767, Boeing 747-400 4.85 Progress D-436 Yak-42, Be-200, An-148 4.91 GE CF6-80C2 A300-600, Boeing 747-400, MD-11, A310 4.97-5.31 RR Trent 700 A330 5.0 PW JT9D Boeing 747, Boeing 767, A310, DC-10 5.0 6 PROPULSIONE
    [Show full text]
  • Clean Sky 2 JU Work Plan 2014/2015
    Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking Amendment nr. 2 to Work Plan 2014-2015 Version 7 – March 2015 – Important Notice on the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking (JU) Work Plan 2014-2015 This Work Plan covers the years 2014 and 2015. Due to the starting phase of the Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking under Regulation (EU) No 558/204 of 6 May 2014 the information contained in this Work Plan (topics list, description, budget, planning of calls) may be subject to updates. Any amended Work Plan will be announced and published on the JU’s website. © CSJU 2015 Please note that the copyright of this document and its content is the strict property of the JU. Any information related to this document disclosed by any other party shall not be construed as having been endorsed by to the JU. The JU expressly disclaims liability for any future changes of the content of this document. ~ Page intentionally left blank ~ Page 2 of 256 Clean Sky 2 Joint Undertaking Amendment nr. 2 to Work Plan 2014-2015 Document Version: V7 Date: 25/03/2015 Revision History Table Version n° Issue Date Reason for change V1 0First9/07/2014 Release V2 30/07/2014 The ANNEX I: 1st Call for Core-Partners: List and Full Description of Topics has been updated and regards the AIR-01-01 topic description: Part 2.1.2 - Open Rotor (CROR) and Ultra High by-pass ratio turbofan engine configurations (link to WP A-1.2), having a specific scope, was removed for consistency reasons. The intent is to publish this subject in the first Call for Partners.
    [Show full text]