DOCSLIB.ORG

GHATF Shark Survey of Population Abundance and Population Size Composition for Target, Byproduct and Bycatch Species

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
GHATF Shark Survey of Population Abundance and Population Size Composition for Target, Byproduct and Bycatch Species R2006/823 l 30/06/2009 GHATF shark survey of population abundance and population size composition for target, byproduct and bycatch species GHATF shark survey of population abundance and population size composition for target, byproduct and bycatch species J. Matias Braccini, Terence I. Walker and Anne S. Gason Department of Primary Industries PO Box 114, Queenscliff, Victoria 3225 June 2009 © Australian Fisheries Management Authority and Primary Industries Research Victoria. This work is copyright. Except as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), no part of this publication may be reproduced by any process, electronic or otherwise, without the specific written permission of the copyright owners. Neither may information be stored electronically in any form whatsoever without such permission. ISBN 978‐1‐74217‐386‐3 Preferred way to cite: Braccini, J. M., Walker, T. I., and Gason, A. S. (2009). GHATF shark survey of population abundance and population size composition for target, byproduct and bycatch species. Final report to Australian Fisheries Management Authority. Project No. R2006/823. June 2009. iv + 123 pp. (Fisheries Research Branch, Department of Primary Industries: Queenscliff, Victoria, Australia). Published by Department of Primary Industries, Fisheries Research Branch, Queenscliff, Victoria, 3225. DISCLAIMER The authors do not warrant that the information in this book is free from errors or omissions. The authors do not accept any form of liability, be it contractual, tortious or otherwise, for the contents of this book or for any consequences arising from its use or any reliance placed. upon it The information, opinions and advice contained in this book may not relate to, or be relevant to, a readerʹs particular circumstances. Opinions expressed by the authors are the individual opinions of those persons and are not necessarily those of the publisher or research provider. GHATF shark survey ii Table of Contents Non‐technical Summary...........................................................................................................................1 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................................3 Background ................................................................................................................................................3 Need ................................................................................................................................................4 Objectives ................................................................................................................................................5 Methods ................................................................................................................................................5 Collection of data.......................................................................................................................................5 Catch rate comparisons.............................................................................................................................6 Post‐capture mortality...............................................................................................................................7 Estimating length‐frequency and age‐frequency structure of population .....................................8 Estimating total mortality ......................................................................................................................10 Results/Discussion ..................................................................................................................................10 Sampling summary .................................................................................................................................10 Catch rate comparisons...........................................................................................................................11 Commercial species.................................................................................................................................11 Bycatch species.........................................................................................................................................13 Size‐frequency composition of the catch ............................................................................................14 Retained and discarded species............................................................................................................15 Post‐capture mortality.............................................................................................................................15 Age‐frequency composition of the catch.............................................................................................15 Wildlife interactions ...............................................................................................................................16 Carcass damage ........................................................................................................................................16 Reproductive sampling ..........................................................................................................................16 Estimating size‐ and age‐structure of commercial shark populations ..........................................16 Estimating total mortality of gummy shark and school shark for each sex .................................17 Benefits / Management Outcomes........................................................................................................18 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................................18 References ..............................................................................................................................................20 Supplements and Appendices ..............................................................................................................97 Appendix 1. Fishing sites for 2007–08 shark survey .........................................................................97 Appendix 2. Catch rate of commercial species caught in each surveys.......................................107 Appendix 3. Catch rate of bycatch species caught in each survey................................................121 GHATF shark survey iii List of Tables Table 1. Sampling summary for the 2007–08 survey 21 Table 2. Number of individuals and species caught during the 2007–08 survey 22 Table 3. Number of individuals of each species caught during the 2007–08 survey 23 Table 4. Between-survey comparisons of the number of individuals of commercial species 28 Table 5. Between-survey comparisons of the number of individuals of bycatch species 43 Table 6. Size-frequency composition of species caught in the 2007–08 survey 46 Table 7. Retained and discarded individuals caught in the 2007–08 survey. 53 Table 8. Retained and discarded individuals caught by mesh size in the 2007–08 survey. 54 Table 9. Post-capture mortality for the species caught in the 2007–08 survey 59 Table 10. Wildlife interactions in the 2007–08 survey 61 Table 11. Carcass damage from predation on commercial species 62 Table 12. Number of samples collected for reproduction during 2007–08 survey 63 Table 13. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 1973–76 64 Table 14. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 1986–87 65 Table 15. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 2007–08 66 Table 16. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) during 1986–87 67 Table 17. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) during 2007–08 68 Table 18. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for common sawshark (Pristiophorus cirratus) during 2007–08 69 Table 19. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for southern sawshark shark (Pristiophorus nudipinnis) during 2007–08 70 Table 20. Gillnet relative length selectivity analysis for elephant fish (Callorhinchus milii) during 2007–08 71 Table 21. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for male gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 1986–87 72 Table 22. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for female gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 1986–87 73 Table 23. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for male school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) during 1986–87 74 Table 24. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for female school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) during 1986–87 75 Table 25. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for male gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 2007–08 76 Table 26. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for female gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) during 2007–08 77 Table 27. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for male school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) during 2007–08 78 Table 28. Gillnet relative age selectivity analysis for female school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) during 2007–08 79 Table 29. Summary of length and age at maximum selectivity for gummy and school shark 80 Table 30. Total mortality estimates for male gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) 1986–87 81 Table 31. Total mortality estimates for female gummy shark (Mustelus antarcticus) 1986–87 82 Table 32. Total mortality
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Recreational Harvest of Sharks and Rays in Western Australia Is Only a Minor Component of the Total Harvest
    Recreational Harvest of Sharks and Rays in Western Australia is only a Minor Component of the Total Harvest Matias Braccini ( [email protected] ) Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Eva Lai Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Karina Ryan Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Stephen Taylor Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development Research Article Keywords: elasmobranch, conservation, management, sheries, catch reconstruction Posted Date: February 23rd, 2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-225321/v1 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Page 1/20 Abstract Sharks and rays are of global conservation concern with an increasing number of species at risk of extinction, mostly attributed to overshing by commercial shing. Their recreational harvest is poorly known but it can be of similar magnitude to the commercial harvest in some regions. We quantied the recreational harvest of sharks and rays in Western Australia, a region with a marine coastline of > 20,000 km. We recorded 33 species/taxonomic groups but the harvest was dominated by dusky and bronze whalers, blacktip reef shark, gummy shark, Port Jackson shark, wobbegongs, and rays and skates. Most species caught were released (85% of all individuals), although gummy and whiskery sharks were typically retained. There was a clear latitudinal gradient of species composition with tropical and subtropical species of the genus Carcharhinus dominating in the north and temperate species of the families Triakidae, Carcharhinidae, Heterodontidae and Rajidae dominating in the south. The recreational harvest was negligible compared with commercial landings.
    [Show full text]
  • Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier) on the East Coast of Australia
    The biology and ecology of the tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) on the east coast of Australia. Bonnie Jane Holmes BSc (Hons) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Biological Sciences ABSTRACT The tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) (Péron and Lesueur 1822) is the largest of the carcharhinids, with a circumglobal distribution in both tropical and warm temperate coastal and pelagic waters. In the western Pacific, G. cuvier movements are wide-ranging, encompassing the east coast of Australia and south Pacific Islands. Throughout the region, G. cuvier is exposed to a range of commercial, recreational, artisanal and illegal foreign fishery impacts, as both a target and by-product species. Listed as ‘near threatened’ on the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List, suitable long term species-specific catch, catch rate and biological data are seldom available for large shark species like G. cuvier, particularly where historical commercial fishery logbook reporting has been poor. Shark control programs targeting large sharks along Australia’s east coast have been in operation for over 60 years, using relatively standardised fishing gear in nearshore waters all year round, with historical catch and effort data recorded by shark contractors. Historical catch, catch rate and biological data collected through the Queensland Shark Control Program (QSCP) since 1993 were investigated, which revealed significant declines (p < 0.05) in catch rates of G. cuvier at some tropical and all sub-tropical locations along the Queensland coast. Significant temporal declines in the average size of G. cuvier also occurred at four of the nine locations analysed (p < 0.05), which could be indicative of fishing reducing abundance in these areas.
    [Show full text]
  • SYNOPSIS of BIOLOGICAL DATA on the SCHOOL SHARK Galeorhinus Australis (Macleay 1881)
    FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 139 FHVS139 (Distribution restricted) SAST - School shark - 1,O8(O4)O1LO S:OPSIS 0F BIOLOGICAL EATA )N THE SCHOOL SHARK Galeorhinus australis (Macleay 1881]) F 'O FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF E UNITED NATIONS FAO Fisheries Synopsis No. 139 FIR/S139 (Distributíon restricted) SAST - School shark - 1,08(04)011,04 SYNOPSIS OF BIOLOGICAL DATA ON THE SCHOOL SHARK Galeorhinus australis (Macleay 1881) Prepared by A.M. Olsen* 11 Orchard Grove Newton, S.A. 5074 Australia FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome 1984 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization oftheUnited Nationsconcerning thelegal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. M-43 ISBN 92-5-1 02085-X Allrightsreserved. No part ofthispublicationmay be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,mechanical, photocopyingor otherwise, withouttheprior permíssion of the copyright owner. Applications for such permission, with a statement of the purpose and extent of the reproduction, should be addressed to the Director, Publications Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Via delle Terme di Caracalla, 00100 Rome, Italy. © FAO 1984 FIR/5l39 School shark PREPARATION OF THIS SYNOPSIS The authors original studies on school shark were carried out while being a Senior Research Scientist with the CSIRO, Division of Fisheries and Oceanography, Cronulla, New South Wales, and continued during his service as Director of the Department of Fisheries and Fauna Conservation, South Australia.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Full Article 1.0MB .Pdf File
    Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57( I): 143-165 ( 1998) 1 May 1998 https://doi.org/10.24199/j.mmv.1998.57.08 FISHES OF WILSONS PROMONTORY AND CORNER INLET, VICTORIA: COMPOSITION AND BIOGEOGRAPHIC AFFINITIES M. L. TURNER' AND M. D. NORMAN2 'Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, PO Box 1379,Townsville, Qld 4810, Australia ([email protected]) 1Department of Zoology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Vic. 3052, Australia (corresponding author: [email protected]) Abstract Turner, M.L. and Norman, M.D., 1998. Fishes of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. Victoria: composition and biogeographic affinities. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria 57: 143-165. A diving survey of shallow-water marine fishes, primarily benthic reef fishes, was under­ taken around Wilsons Promontory and in Comer Inlet in 1987 and 1988. Shallow subtidal reefs in these regions are dominated by labrids, particularly Bluethroat Wrasse (Notolabrus tet­ ricus) and Saddled Wrasse (Notolabrus fucicola), the odacid Herring Cale (Odax cyanomelas), the serranid Barber Perch (Caesioperca rasor) and two scorpidid species, Sea Sweep (Scorpis aequipinnis) and Silver Sweep (Scorpis lineolata). Distributions and relative abundances (qualitative) are presented for 76 species at 26 sites in the region. The findings of this survey were supplemented with data from other surveys and sources to generate a checklist for fishes in the coastal waters of Wilsons Promontory and Comer Inlet. 23 I fishspecies of 92 families were identified to species level. An additional four species were only identified to higher taxonomic levels. These fishes were recorded from a range of habitat types, from freshwater streams to marine habitats (to 50 m deep).
    [Show full text]
  • Coelho Phd Lantern S
    UNIVERSIDADEdo ALGARVE FaculdadedeCiênciasdoMaredo Ambiente Biology,populationdynamics,managementandconservation ofdeepwaterlanternsharks,Etmopterusspinax and Etmopteruspusillus (Chondrichthyes:Etmopteridae)insouthernPortugal(northeastAtlantic). (DoutoramentoemCiênciaseTecnologiasdasPescas,especialidadedeBiologiaPesqueira) (ThesisforthedegreeinDoctorofPhilosophyinFisheriesSciencesandTechnologies,specialtyinFisheriesBiology) RUIPEDROANDRADECOELHO Faro (2007) UNIVERSIDADE DO ALGARVE FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DO MAR E DO AMBIENTE Biology, population dynamics, management and conservation of deep water lantern sharks, Etmopterus spinax and Etmopterus pusillus (Chondrichthyes: Etmopteridae) in southern Portugal (northeast Atlantic). (Doutoramento em Ciências e Tecnologias das Pescas, especialidade de Biologia Pesqueira) (Thesis for the degree in Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries Sciences and Technologies, specialty in Fisheries Biology) RUI PEDRO ANDRADE COELHO Orientador / Supervisor: Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini Júri / Jury: - Prof. Doutor José Pedro Andrade, Professor Catedrático da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Karim Erzini, Professor Associado com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve; - Prof. Doutor Leonel Paulo Sul de Serrano Gordo, Professor Auxiliar com Agregação da Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa; - Prof. Doutor Manuel Seixas Afonso Dias, Professor Auxiliar da Faculdade de Ciências do Mar e do Ambiente, Universidade do Algarve;
    [Show full text]
  • Port Jackson Shark, Heterodontus Portusjacksoni
    Published Date: 1 March 2019 Port Jackson Shark, Heterodontus portusjacksoni Report Card Sustainable assessment IUCN Red List IUCN Red List Australian Endemic to Australia Global Least Concern Assessment Assessment Assessors Huveneers, C. & Simpfendorfer, C. Abundant species that is taken as bycatch but has high post-release Report Card Remarks survival Summary The Port Jackson Shark is an abundant shark Source: Mark Norman/ Museum Victoria. Licence: CC by Attribution endemic to southern Australian waters. It is a large bycatch of several fisheries across its range, however most individuals are returned to the water alive. Studies have shown that the species is highly resilient to capture stress from gillnet, trawl, and longline gear, suggesting high post-release survival rates. Although there was a localised decline of the population in Bass Straight between 1973 and 2001, this trend has been reversed. In addition, an ecological risk assessment showed that the Port Jackson Shark is at low risk from several fisheries because of its low catch susceptibility. The effects of fisheries on the Port Jackson Shark in other areas are likely negligible. Habitat modification and other environmental factors do not appear to be a threat to the population. Therefore, the Port Jackson Shark is assessed as Least Concern (IUCN) and Sustainable (SAFS). Distribution The Port Jackson Shark is commonly found on the southern Australian continental shelf from Byron Bay (New South Wales) south through Victoria, South Australia, and to Houtman Abrolhos (Western Australia), including Tasmania. Records from York Sound (northern Western Australia) and Moreton Bay (Queensland) are questionable. There is a single record of one individual from New Zealand (Last and Stevens 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Tiger Shark (Galeocerdo Cuvier) Abundance and Growth in a Subtropical Embayment: Evidence from 7 Years of Standardized fishing Effort
    Marine Biology (2006) 149: 961–968 DOI 10.1007/s00227-006-0278-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Aaron J. Wirsing Æ Michael R. Heithaus Lawrence M. Dill Tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier) abundance and growth in a subtropical embayment: evidence from 7 years of standardized fishing effort Received: 9 June 2005 / Accepted: 23 January 2006 / Published online: 25 February 2006 Ó Springer-Verlag 2006 Abstract The tiger shark (Galeocerdo cuvier Peron and from other regions, but exceeded those for populations Lesueur 1822) is a widely distributed predator with a elsewhere for sharks >275 cm fork length (FL), perhaps broad diet and the potential to affect marine community because mature sharks in the study area rely heavily on structure, yet information on local patterns of abun- large prey. The data suggest that (1) the threat of dance for this species is lacking. Tiger shark catch data predation faced by animals consumed by tiger sharks were gathered over 7 years of tag and release research fluctuates dramatically within and between years, and fishing (1991–2000, 2002–2004) in Shark Bay, Western (2) efforts to monitor large shark abundance should be Australia (25°45¢S, 113°44¢E). Sharks were caught using extensive enough to detect inter-annual variation and drumlines deployed in six permanent zones (3km2 in sufficiently intensive to account for intra-annual trends. area). Fishing effort was standardized across days and months, and catch rates on hooks were expressed as the number of sharks caught hÀ1. A total of 449 individual tiger sharks was captured; 29 were recaptured. Tiger Introduction shark catch rate showed seasonal periodicity, being higher during the warm season (Sep–May) than during The tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier, is a large carcharhinid the cold season (Jun–Aug), and was marked by inter- that often is an apex predator in marine ecosystems annual variability.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Dynamics and Expanded Vertical Niche of Blue Sharks in Oceanographic Fronts Reveal Habitat Targets for Conservation
    Spatial Dynamics and Expanded Vertical Niche of Blue Sharks in Oceanographic Fronts Reveal Habitat Targets for Conservation Nuno Queiroz1,2, Nicolas E. Humphries1,4, Leslie R. Noble3, Anto´ nio M. Santos2, David W. Sims1,5,6* 1 Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, United Kingdom, 2 CIBIO – U.P., Centro de Investigac¸a˜o em Biodiversidade e Recursos Gene´ticos, Campus Agra´rio de Vaira˜o, Rua Padre Armando Quintas, Vaira˜o, Portugal, 3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom, 4 School of Marine Science and Engineering, Marine Institute, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, United Kingdom, 5 Ocean and Earth Science, National Oceanography Centre, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom, 6 Centre for Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, Southampton, United Kingdom Abstract Dramatic population declines among species of pelagic shark as a result of overfishing have been reported, with some species now at a fraction of their historical biomass. Advanced telemetry techniques enable tracking of spatial dynamics and behaviour, providing fundamental information on habitat preferences of threatened species to aid conservation. We tracked movements of the highest pelagic fisheries by-catch species, the blue shark Prionace glauca, in the North-east Atlantic using pop-off satellite-linked archival tags to determine the degree of space use linked to habitat and to examine vertical niche. Overall, blue sharks moved south-west of tagging sites (English Channel; southern Portugal), exhibiting pronounced site fidelity correlated with localized productive frontal areas, with estimated space-use patterns being significantly different from that of random walks.
    [Show full text]
  • Port Jackson Shark
    Not logged in Talk Contributions Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit View history Search Port Jackson shark From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Main page The Port Jackson shark (Heterodontus portusjacksoni) is Port Jackson shark Contents a nocturnal, oviparous (egg laying) type of bullhead shark Featured content of the family Heterodontidae, found in the coastal region of Current events southern Australia, including the waters off Port Jackson. It Random article has a large, blunt head with prominent forehead ridges and Donate to Wikipedia Wikipedia store dark brown harness-like markings on a lighter grey-brown body, and can grow up to 1.67 metres (5.5 ft) long.[1] Interaction Help The Port Jackson shark is a migratory species, traveling About Wikipedia south in the summer and returning north to breed in the Conservation status Community portal winter months. It feeds on hard-shelled mollusks, Recent changes crustaceans, sea urchins, and fish. Identification of this Contact page species is very easy due to the pattern of harness-like Tools markings which cross the eyes, run along the back to the Least Concern (IUCN 3.1) What links here first dorsal fin, then cross the side of the body, in addition Related changes Scientific classification to the spine in front of both dorsal fins. Upload file Kingdom: Animalia Special pages Contents [hide] Phylum: Chordata Permanent link 1 Distribution and habitat open in browser PRO version Are you a developer? Try out the HTML to PDF API pdfcrowd.com Page information 1 Distribution and habitat Class: Chondrichthyes 2 Appearance Wikidata item Subclass: Elasmobranchii Cite this page 2.1 Teeth 3 Respiratory system Superorder: Selachimorpha Print/export 4 Reproduction Order: Heterodontiformes Create a book 5 Digestive system Download as PDF Family: Heterodontidae 6 Relationship with humans Printable version Genus: Heterodontus 7 Conservation Other projects 8 Gallery Species: H.
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics of the School Shark (Galeorhinus Galeus)
    Population genetics of the school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) in New Zealand, Australian and Chilean waters By Sebastián Ignacio Hernández Muñoz A thesis Submitted to Victoria University of Wellington in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Cell & Molecular BioScience Victoria University of Wellington Te Whare Wānanga o te Ūpoko o te Ika Māui 2013 This thesis was conducted under the supervision of: Dr. Peter A. Ritchie (Primary Supervisor) Victoria University of Wellington Wellington, New Zealand and Dr. Malcolm Francis (Secondary Supervisor) National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Wellington, New Zealand This thesis is dedicated to the memory of my grandmother (Tally) Abstract The school shark (Galeorhinus galeus) is a coastal bentho-pelagic species that is highly migratory and has a widespread distribution in temperate waters. This species matures late, has a relatively low fecundity and is slow growing, which makes it vulnerable to overfishing. They are commercially fished throughout their distribution, and some global stocks have been under pressure because of poor management. In Australia, longline and gillnet fisheries targeted pregnant females and juveniles around Victorian and Tasmanian nursery grounds, resulting in loss of historical inshore nursery habitat. School shark tagging programmes have reported migration between Australian and New Zealand stocks, but preliminary genetic studies have suggested that there are slight genetic differences between the stocks. Currently, the Australian and New Zealand school shark fisheries are assessed and managed as separate stocks. However, the question of whether this species is comprised of a single population or multiple sub-populations in the South Pacific remains unresolved.
    [Show full text]
  • First Age and Growth Estimates in the Deep Water Shark, Etmopterus Spinax (Linnaeus, 1758), by Deep Coned Vertebral Analysis
    Mar Biol DOI 10.1007/s00227-007-0769-y RESEARCH ARTICLE First age and growth estimates in the deep water shark, Etmopterus Spinax (Linnaeus, 1758), by deep coned vertebral analysis Enrico Gennari · Umberto Scacco Received: 2 May 2007 / Accepted: 4 July 2007 © Springer-Verlag 2007 Abstract The velvet belly Etmopterus spinax (Linnaeus, by an alternation of translucent and opaque areas (Ride- 1758) is a deep water bottom-dwelling species very com- wood 1921; Urist 1961; Cailliet et al. 1983). Vertebral mon in the western Mediterranean sea. This species is a dimensions, as well as their degree of calciWcation, vary portion of the by-catch of the red shrimps and Norway lob- considerably within the elasmobranch group (La Marca sters otter trawl Wsheries on the meso and ipo-bathyal 1966; Applegate 1967; Moss 1977). For example, vertebrae grounds. A new, simple, rapid, and inexpensive vertebral of coastal and pelagic species are more calciWed than those preparation method was used on a total of 241 specimens, of bottom dwelling deep-water sharks (Cailliet et al. 1986; sampled throughout 2000. Post-cranial portions of vertebral Cailliet 1990). These diVerences are also reXected in varia- column were removed and vertebrae were prepared for age- tions of shape and in growth zone appearance, such as the ing readings. Band pair counts ranged from 0 to 9 in presence and quality of bands and/or rings. Due to these females, and from 0 to 7 in males. Von BertalanVy growth diVerences, a general protocol for the elasmobranch group equations estimated for both sexes suggested a higher is not really available because of the high variability of cal- W longevity for females (males: L1 = 394.3 mm k =0.19 ci cation degree among species (Applegate 1967; Cailliet W t0 = ¡1.41 L0 = 92.7 mm A99 = 18.24 years; females: L1 = et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Novel Use of Pop-Up Satellite Archival Telemetry in Sawsharks: Insights Into the Movement of the Common Sawshark Pristiophorus Cirratus (Pristiophoridae)
    Novel use of pop-up satellite archival telemetry in sawsharks: insights into the movement of the common sawshark Pristiophorus cirratus (Pristiophoridae) Patrick J Burke ( [email protected] ) Macquarie University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7217-0215 Johann Mourier MARBEC, University of Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD Troy F Gaston School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle Jane E Williamson Macquarie University, Department of Biological Sciences Telemetry case report Keywords: elasmobranch, satellite telemetry, diel vertical migration, tagging, Pristiophoridae, Australia, movement Posted Date: October 16th, 2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-31653/v2 License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Read Full License Version of Record: A version of this preprint was published on November 17th, 2020. See the published version at https://doi.org/10.1186/s40317-020-00222-y. Page 1/20 Abstract Background Understanding movement patterns of a species is vital for optimising conservation and management strategies. This information is often dicult to obtain in the marine realm for species that regularly occur at depth. The common sawshark (Pristiophorus cirratus) is a small, benthic associated elasmobranch species that occurs from shallow to deep-sea environments. No information is known regarding its movement ecology. Despite this, P. cirrata are still regularly landed as nontargeted catch in the south eastern Australian sheries. Three individuals were tagged with pop-up satellite archival tags (PSATs) off the coast of Tasmania, Australia, to test the viability of satellite tagging on these small elasmobranchs and to provide novel insights into their movement.
    [Show full text]