DOCSLIB.ORG

Big Ben the Builder: School Construction -- 1953-66

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1988 Big Ben the Builder: School Construction -- 1953-66 Cynthia A. Wnek Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Wnek, Cynthia A., "Big Ben the Builder: School Construction -- 1953-66" (1988). Dissertations. 2617. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2617 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1988 Cynthia A. Wnek BIG BEN THE BUILDER: SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION -- 1953-66 by Cynthia A. Wnek A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of Loyola University of Chicago in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 1988 ~ . ·' "· •' ., •,.. ' . Photograph One: Benjamin C. Willis as General Superintendent of Schools, 1956. Source: Benjamin C. Willis -- Personal collection ii iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The writer extends her appreciation to the many persons who provided encouragement and advice and who unselfishly gave of their time and support of this project. A special thanks to the Loyola professors who worked with me throughout these past years to help me reach this goal. To Dr. Joan K. Smith, who has given above and beyond what was her job, and to Dr. Todd Hoover and Father Walter Krolikowski, who provided valuable assistance, acknowledg­ ment is expressed. In addition to these, appreciation is given to Dr. Florence Williams at the Chicago Board of Education Library for her support in my research. Her knowledge led me to discover information that I would not have uncovered. To my family, friends, and faculty and staff, who were always there to give me that extra push that I needed, I say, "I couldn't have done it without all of you". Special mention is given to one person who never let me give up my dream and never stopped believing that I could complete my climb to the top of the mountain. And, last but not least, I will be forever grateful to Dr. and Mrs. Benjamin C. Willis, whose guidance and friendship throughout the writing of this dissertation has made this an intellectual and a memorable venture. iv VITA Cynthia A. Wnek is the daughter of Lee Rychlec and Elizabeth ( Genosick) Rychlec. She was born and raised in Chicago, Illinois. She attended St. Helen Elementary School and St. Stanislaus High School in Chicago. Mrs. Wnek received the degree of Bachelor of Science from Northeastern Illinois University of Chicago. She also received the Masters Degree in Special Education at North­ eastern Illinois University. She has been working in the Chicago Public School sys­ tem for the past 28 years. She began her association with the Board of Education as a parent volunteer. She became a teacher aide and went on to become a teacher. Mrs. Wnek is presently the principal of the Schubert Elementary School in Chicago. V TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS . iv VITA................................................. V LIST OF TABLES. ix LIST OF CHARTS. xi LIST OF MAPS .................. ,. xii Chapter I. INTRODUCTION . ............................. 1 Increase in Black Population........... 3 Resulting Educational Problems......... 5 Willis -- Superintendent of Chicago Schools............................ 8 Background. 9 Educational Background and Career Experience. 1 O Buffalo Superintendency................ 12 From Buffalo to Chicago................ 14 Educational Philosophy................. 15 Willis 1 s Character..................... 17 Civil, Social and Cultural Interests... 19 Recognition and Accolades.............. 20 Willis's Effect ori System.............. 22 II. POPULATION AND ENROLLMENT ................. 26 Old and Crowded Communities............ 29 Newly Developed Home Communities....... 34 Fluctuating Population Shifts.......... 35 School Enrollment...................... 46 Cone 1 us ion. 51 III. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION: 1953-55 .............. 58 School Construction in the Hunt Years.. 60 Five-Year Plan......................... 62 Changing Conditions and Shifting Population......................... 65 vi Unfinished Projects Under Hunt......... 73 Wi 11 is Enters. 76 Willis Character Added to the Building Program and Chicago....... 78 Areas of Special Attention By Willis... 82 IV. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION WILLIS STYLE: 1953-57 .. 89 Willis's First Contracts............... 90 1955 Begins............................ 94 Early Signs of Trouble................. 99 1956 Begins............................ 101 1957 -- The Beginning of the End....... 105 Beginning of Racial Protests........... 109 Willis's Building Program Accomplish- ments.............................. 114 v. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION: 1958-60 .............. 121 The Program in Review.................. 121 New Tensions Arise..................... 126 Willis Continues in Spite of Pressures. 131 Controversy Over School Boundaries..... 138 New Buildings and Additions Contracted for in 1958........................ 140 The Willis Building Program Amid Tur- moil. 142 New Heights of Achievement for Willis Mix With Dissent................... 145 Willis's Image Good as Year Ends....... 148 VI. BEGINNING YEARS OF TURMOIL: 1961-62 ....... 152 Years of Praise and Blame.............. 152 A Concerted Effort Becomes Apparent.... 156 Building Program Update................ 161 Status of Building Program............. 165 First Mobile Units Placed.............. 170 The Concerted Effort Continues......... 174 Special Recognition for Willis......... 176 VII. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PATTERNS AND RACIAL UNREST ................................ 183 The Nature of the Conflict............. 183 School Reports......................... 192 The Peak of the Conflict............... 195 The End of 1964........................ 198 vii VIII. SCHOOL CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM AMID OPPOSITION 204 Willis's Reelection.................... 204 Plans to Oust Willis................... 206 The Other Side of ·the Story............ 208 Federal Aid and Desegregation.......... 211 Willis's Desegregation Plan for High Schools............................ 213 The Building Program and Finance ....... · 213 Facts About Willis's School Construc- tion Program....................... 227 Willis's Last Year as Superintendent... 229 IX. WILLIS'S SUPERINTENDENCY IN RETROSPECT ..... 248 REFERENCES ................. -.......................... 258 viii LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1. Population increases 1940-60 -- old crowded areas. 40 2. Newly developed home communities .. : ..... 42 3. Fluctuating population shifts ........... 43 4. Enrollment statistics for the 1954 school year. 41 5. Estimated enrollments in elementary and high schools from September 1954 to September 1959 inclusive ............ 47 6. Elementary and high school enrollments in numbers. 54 7. Continuing rise in the birth rate in Chicago.............................. 55 8. New schools and additions initiated by Hunt. 60 9. Various stages of school construction in 1953..................................... 74 10. Fully operating schools in June 1953 .... 77 11. Budget appropriations for 1957 .......... 108 12. New elementary school and addition con­ tracts in 1957 in order of board reports. 109 13. Building program accomplishments -- 1952- 57. 115 14. Additions opened -- 1952-57 ............. 116 15. Sites purchased -- 1952-57 .............. 117 16. New buildings and additions opened in 1958. 125 17. Sites purchased in 1958 ................. 125 ix 18. Operating expense dollar ................ 1!59 19. Reimbursements for Title III N.D.E.A .... 212 20. Buildings and additions occupied after 1-65 (elementary and secondary) ..... 215 21. Schools under construction in 1966 ...... 216 22. Schools named to receive citations ...... 217 23. Schools named to receive honor awards ... 218 24. Sources of inco.. me . ...................... 220 25. Tax rate per $100 assessment ............ 220 26. New schools and additions built in 1963 .. 224 X LIST OF CHARTS Chart 1. Kindergarten through college enroll- ment. 49 2. Elementary enrollment ............... 52 3. High School enrollment .............. 53 4. Budget pie graph for 1953 and 1963 .. 223 xi LIST OF MAPS Maps Page 1. Community Areas -- Chicago of Chicago ... 28 2. Areas Considered for Construction in 1955................................ 122 3. Special Summer School .................. 209 4. Elementary Enrollment .................. 233 5. Areas With Highest Poverty Level ....... 234 6. Elementary Growth Gains ................ 235 7. Building Program ....................... 236 8. Headstart Centers ...................... 237 9. Guidance Centers ....................... 238 10. Elementary After-School Classes ........ 239 11. High School After-School Classes ....... 240 12. Educable Mentally Handicapped Classes .. 241 • 13. Black Population Percentages ........... 242 14. Hot Lunch Programs ..................... 243 15. Geographic Distribution of Pupils By Race -- Elementary Schools ......... 244 16. Geographic Distribution of Pupils By Race -- High Schools ............... 245 xii CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION During the decade 1950-1960, more than 90 percent of the total increase in population in the continental United States occurred in the great metropolitan areas. This rapidly
Recommended publications
  • Pittsfield Building 55 E

    Pittsfield Building 55 E

    LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Pittsfield Building 55 E. Washington Preliminary Landmarkrecommendation approved by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, December 12, 2001 CITY OFCHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Departmentof Planning and Developement Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner Cover: On the right, the Pittsfield Building, as seen from Michigan Avenue, looking west. The Pittsfield Building's trademark is its interior lobbies and atrium, seen in the upper and lower left. In the center, an advertisement announcing the building's construction and leasing, c. 1927. Above: The Pittsfield Building, located at 55 E. Washington Street, is a 38-story steel-frame skyscraper with a rectangular 21-story base that covers the entire building lot-approximately 162 feet on Washington Street and 120 feet on Wabash Avenue. The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. It is responsible for recommending to the City Council that individual buildings, sites, objects, or entire districts be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The Comm ission is staffed by the Chicago Department of Planning and Development, 33 N. LaSalle St., Room 1600, Chicago, IL 60602; (312-744-3200) phone; (312­ 744-2958) TTY; (312-744-9 140) fax; web site, http ://www.cityofchicago.org/ landmarks. This Preliminary Summary ofInformation is subject to possible revision and amendment during the designation proceedings. Only language contained within the designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. PRELIMINARY SUMMARY OF INFORMATION SUBMITIED TO THE COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS IN DECEMBER 2001 PITTSFIELD BUILDING 55 E.
  • A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Motor Row, Chicago, Illinois Street

    A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Motor Row, Chicago, Illinois Street

    NFS Form 10-900-b OMR..Np. 1024-0018 (March 1992) / ~^"~^--.~.. United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / / v*jf f ft , I I / / National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form /..//^' -A o C_>- f * f / *•• This form is used for documenting multiple property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (National Register Bulletin 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested information. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Form 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items. x New Submission Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Motor Row, Chicago, Illinois B. Associated Historic Contexts (Name each associated historic context, identifying theme, geographical area, and chronological period for each.) Dealerships and the Development of a Commercial District 1905-1936 Evolution of a Building Type 1905-1936 Motor Row and Chicago Architects 1905-1936 C. Form Prepared by name/title _____Linda Peters. Architectural Historian______________________ street & number 435 8. Cleveland Avenue telephone 847.506.0754 city or town ___Arlington Heights________________state IL zip code 60005 D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation form meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
  • Cairo Supper Club Building 4015-4017 N

    Cairo Supper Club Building 4015-4017 N

    Exhibit A LANDMARK DESIGNATION REPORT Cairo Supper Club Building 4015-4017 N. Sheridan Rd. Final Landmark Recommendation adopted by the Commission on Chicago Landmarks, August 7, 2014 CITY OF CHICAGO Rahm Emanuel, Mayor Department of Planning and Development Andrew J. Mooney, Commissioner The Commission on Chicago Landmarks, whose nine members are appointed by the Mayor and City Council, was established in 1968 by city ordinance. The Commission is re- sponsible for recommending to the City Council which individual buildings, sites, objects, or districts should be designated as Chicago Landmarks, which protects them by law. The landmark designation process begins with a staff study and a preliminary summary of information related to the potential designation criteria. The next step is a preliminary vote by the landmarks commission as to whether the proposed landmark is worthy of consideration. This vote not only initiates the formal designation process, but it places the review of city per- mits for the property under the jurisdiction of the Commission until a final landmark recom- mendation is acted on by the City Council. This Landmark Designation Report is subject to possible revision and amendment dur- ing the designation process. Only language contained within a designation ordinance adopted by the City Council should be regarded as final. 2 CAIRO SUPPER CLUB BUILDING (ORIGINALLY WINSTON BUILDING) 4015-4017 N. SHERIDAN RD. BUILT: 1920 ARCHITECT: PAUL GERHARDT, SR. Located in the Uptown community area, the Cairo Supper Club Building is an unusual building de- signed in the Egyptian Revival architectural style, rarely used for Chicago buildings. This one-story commercial building is clad with multi-colored terra cotta, created by the Northwestern Terra Cotta Company and ornamented with a variety of ancient Egyptian motifs, including lotus-decorated col- umns and a concave “cavetto” cornice with a winged-scarab medallion.
  • Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago During the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933

    Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago During the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933

    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Theses and Dissertations Summer 2019 Exclusive Dining: Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago during the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933 Samuel C. King Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd Recommended Citation King, S. C.(2019). Exclusive Dining: Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago during the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/5418 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you by Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Exclusive Dining: Immigration and Restaurants in Chicago during the Era of Chinese Exclusion, 1893-1933 by Samuel C. King Bachelor of Arts New York University, 2012 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History College of Arts and Sciences University of South Carolina 2019 Accepted by: Lauren Sklaroff, Major Professor Mark Smith, Committee Member David S. Shields, Committee Member Erica J. Peters, Committee Member Yulian Wu, Committee Member Cheryl L. Addy, Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Abstract The central aim of this project is to describe and explicate the process by which the status of Chinese restaurants in the United States underwent a dramatic and complete reversal in American consumer culture between the 1890s and the 1930s. In pursuit of this aim, this research demonstrates the connection that historically existed between restaurants, race, immigration, and foreign affairs during the Chinese Exclusion era.
  • Nipc Econ Brochfinal

    Nipc Econ Brochfinal

    BUILDING A REGIONAL FRAMEWORK A View of Economic Activity northeastern illinois planning commission The future of northeastern Illinois, which will grow by more than 1.7 million EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE residents over the next 28 years, will be shaped by many thousands of Herbert T. Schumann Jr. individual choices about where to live, work, and do business. These President personal decisions will impact each other as residents seek to move close Rita R. Athas to jobs, and businesses close to their suppliers, workers, and customers. Vice President The future will be influenced by decisions about investment and regulation by the region’s 1200 local governments and state and federal agencies. Michael K. Smith Secretary Will these public and private choices reinforce or undermine each other? Edward W. Paesel Will the decisions move us toward the future we want? Ensuring that they Tr e a s u r e r do is the essence of NIPC’s comprehensive planning program, entitled Alan L. Bennett Common Ground: A Blueprint for Regional Action.The Commission’s broad Vice President for Planning goal in undertaking Common Ground is to help the region develop a James C. Berg shared vision for its future, identify common issues and concerns, and Vice President for Water Resources make mutual commitments to address them. Jerry Butler Past Commission President Increased public understanding of and involvement in the regional Charlie A. Thurston planning process is critical to the success of Common Ground.This Past Commission President series of publications, Building a Regional Framework,is designed to educate the public about particular issues and spark greater public input Ronald L.
  • First Chicago School

    First Chicago School

    FIRST CHICAGO SCHOOL JASON HALE, TONY EDWARDS TERRANCE GREEN ORIGINS In the 1880s Chicago created a group of architects whose work eventually had a huge effect on architecture. The early buildings of the First Chicago School like the Auditorium, “had traditional load-bearing walls” Martin Roche, William Holabird, and Louis Sullivan all played a huge role in the development of the first chicago school MATERIALS USED iron beams Steel Brick Stone Cladding CHARACTERISTICS The "Chicago window“ originated from this style of architecture They called this the commercial style because of the new tall buildings being created The windows and columns were changed to make the buildings look not as big FEATURES Steel-Frame Buildings with special cladding This material made big plate-glass window areas better and limited certain things as well The “Chicago Window” which was built using this style “combined the functions of light-gathering and natural ventilation” and create a better window DESIGN The Auditorium building was designed by Dankmar Adler and Louis Sullivan The Auditorium building was a tall building with heavy outer walls, and it was similar to the appearance of the Marshall Field Warehouse One of the most greatest features of the Auditorium building was “its massive raft foundation” DANKMAR ALDER Adler served in the Union Army during the Civil War Dankmar Adler played a huge role in the rebuilding much of Chicago after the Great Chicago Fire He designed many great buildings such as skyscrapers that brought out the steel skeleton through their outter design he created WILLIAM HOLABIRD He served in the United States Military Academy then moved to chicago He worked on architecture with O.
  • Rainready Chatham

    Rainready Chatham

    Phase One Report: RainReady Chatham PHASE ONE REPORT: RAINREADY CHATHAM | A FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CHATHAM, CHICAGO Phase One Report: RainReady Chatham A Flood Risk Assessment for Chatham, Chicago PREPARED BY THE CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY AND THE U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS OCTOBER 2015 ©2015 CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHNOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 RAINREADY CHATHAM 2 CHATHAM 3 FLOOD RISK 6 SOURCES OF FLOODING 8 CAUSES OF FLOODING 12 EXISTING PLANS AND PROGRAMS 15 NEXT STEPS 16 APPENDIX RAINREADY CHATHAM STEERING COMMITTEE CO-CHAIRS Cheryl Watson Chicago Conservation Corps Richard Wooten Gathering Point Community Council MEMBERS Lorri E. Baldwin Lori Burns Ora Jackson ABOUT CNT RainReadySM is an initiative of the Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT). As an award-winning innovations laboratory for urban sustainability, CNT is dedicated to taking on big challenges, starting in small places. CNT helps make neighborhoods, cities, and regions work better, for everyone. This work is generously supported with grants from The Boeing Company, Grand Victoria Foundation, the Joyce Foundation, the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, the Prince Charitable Trusts, and the Surdna Foundation. PHASE ONE REPORT: RAINREADY CHATHAM | A FLOOD RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CHATHAM, CHICAGO INTRODUCTION Chatham, a neighborhood on Chicago’s South Side, The path forward for a RainReady Chatham will require has been susceptible to flooding since the area known solutions at multiple scales. Major investments are colloquially as Hogs Swamp was first developed in the needed to upgrade and maintain the sewer network (grey 1860s. Today, many Chatham residents and business infrastructure). Community-wide green infrastructure owners experience chronic basement flooding, which is is necessary for reducing the amount of stormwater caused by backups in the city sewer system and seepage runoff entering the sewer system.
  • Stadium Development and Urban Communities in Chicago

    Stadium Development and Urban Communities in Chicago

    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 1996 Stadium Development and Urban Communities in Chicago Costas Spirou Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Spirou, Costas, "Stadium Development and Urban Communities in Chicago" (1996). Dissertations. 3649. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/3649 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1996 Costas Spirou LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO STADIUM DEVELOPMENT AND URBAN COMMUNITIES IN CHICAGO VOLUME 1 (CHAPTERS 1 TO 7) A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY BY COSTAS S. SPIROU CHICAGO, ILLINOIS JANUARY, 1997 Copyright by Costas S. Spirou, 1996 All rights reserved. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The realization and completion of this project would not have been possible without the contribution of many. Dr. Philip Nyden, as the Director of the Committee provided me with continuous support and encouragement. His guidance, insightful comments and reflections, elevated this work to a higher level. Dr. Talmadge Wright's appreciation of urban social theory proved inspirational. His knowledge and feedback aided the theoretical development of this manuscript. Dr. Larry Bennett of DePaul University contributed by endlessly commenting on earlier drafts of this study.
  • The Chicago City Manual Was at the Time Regarded As an Experiment, but It Soon Came to Be Known As a Necessary Thing That Would Take Its Place As a Regular An

    The Chicago City Manual Was at the Time Regarded As an Experiment, but It Soon Came to Be Known As a Necessary Thing That Would Take Its Place As a Regular An

    UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY Class Book Volume CENTRAL CIRCULATION BOOKSTACKS The person charging this material is re- sponsible for its renewal or its return to the library from which it was borrowed on or before the Latest Date stamped below. The Minimum Fee for each Lost Book is $50.00. Theft, mutilation, and underlining of boolcs ore reasons for disciplinary action and may result in dismissal from the University. TO RENEW CALL TELEPHONE CENTER, 333-8400 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LIBRARY AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN DEC 1 3 1994 ^ 2 2 1994 When renewing by phone, write new due date below previous due date. L162 CHICAGO CITY MANUAL 1909 CONTAINING The Names and Official Addresses of the Executive and All Other City Officers with Descriptions of Their Functions Lists of the Aldermen and of the Committees of the City Council and the Rules Governing That Body And Many Other Matters Relating to the City and Its Institutions Prepared by FRANCIS A.EASTMAN City Statistician CHICAGO: BUREAU OF STATISTICS AND MUNICIPAL LIBRARY 1909 nrir^ THE FRONTISPIECE. ^ The half-tone picture on the opposite page, gives a perfect view of the site of the City Hall as prepared by the contractors on the foundations and as turned over by them to the contractors for the super- structure. A few words of description will inform the reader of what has been placed below the surface of the site to support the enormous weight of the building when that is completed. From the records in the possession of Alderman Francis W. Taylor, Chairman of the City Hall building Committee, it appears that the wrecking of the old City Hall was commenced on August 11, 1908, and that work on the new foundations was begun on January 4, 1909.
  • MEETING of the HIGHWOOD PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:30 P.M

    MEETING of the HIGHWOOD PLANNING and ZONING COMMISSION Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:30 P.M

    AGENDA MEETING OF THE HIGHWOOD PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:30 p.m. Meeting Meeting will be held at Highwood City Hall 17 Highwood Avenue - Highwood, Illinois I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES i. June 8, 2016 IV. SCHEDULED BUSINESS i. 546 Green Bay Road – Planned Unit Development ii. 523 Bank Lane – Zoning Variation From Section 11-6-2C of the Special Use Matrix V. ADJOURNMENT CITY OF HIGHWOOD PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Public Hearing Wednesday, June 8, 2016 6:30 PM Property in 546 Green Bay Road Question 16-15-207-027 16-15-207-011 Owner: Wintrust Financial Corporation Applicant: Highwood Property Investors LLC/FIDES Capital Partners LLC Zoning District B-1 Retail Business District R-3 Residential Duplex Dwelling Request: Petition for a Planned Unit Development Summary: The Petitioner, Highwood Property Investors LLC/FIDES Capital Partners LLC has submitted a petition for a planned unit development. The development is a four story residential development of 28 total units consisting of 16 two bedroom units and 12 one bedroom units. The site plan demonstrates the development utilizing 24 onsite parking spaces in addition to 13 existing on- street spaces along Washington Avenue adjacent to the development. Staff Review and Comment: In the Downtown Projects Guidebook recently approved by the City of Highwood, these parcels fall within the Green Bay Road District. This district states that “Well established and successful existing businesses should remain, but other uses, such as office and residential buildings, should be considered.” Further in the report, stand-alone apartment buildings are recommended for heights up to four stories, which match the existing properties on Lake View Avenue, with heights of four to seven stories recommended for mixed-use buildings to generate viable development economics.
  • Your House Has a History

    Your House Has a History

    COMMISSION ON CHICAGO LANDMARKS YOUR HOUSE HAS A HISTORY A Step-by-Step Guide to Researching Your Property CITY OF CHICAGO Richard M. Daley, Mayor Department of Planning and Development Alicia Mazur Berg, Commissioner YOUR HOUSE HAS A HISTORY You own a lovely home that you're proud to call your own. But someone owned it before you. Someone built it, cared for it, and made changes through the years to it. And now you're interested in finding out the "who, when and what" of your property. Researching your house can be fun, fascinating and completely engrossing. This pamphlet will help you begin, offering advice on how to identify basic information about your house and your neighborhood. It is designed to take you systematically through the process. Using the sources discussed here, you can identify: the date your house was built, if an architect is associated with its design, who had it built, and the changes that have been made to it over the years. Be sure to read the appendix as well, where detailed information on resources can be found. However, beware! Research can become addictive. It can also be frustrating. You may exhaust every source possible and still not find the answers to your questions. But no matter how many questions remain unanswered, you will have unearthed some interesting information, learned a little more about your community, and become familiar with some important public institutions in the city. So, have fun, and good luck. TIP: Getting Started To best organize your time while conducting this research, read through this pamphlet and identify all the resources you want to consult while at a particular library or historical society.
  • Gsa Historic Building Leasing

    Gsa Historic Building Leasing

    GSA HISTORIC BUILDING LEASING HISTORIC BUILDINGS AND THE ARTS CENTER OF EXPERTISE FEBRUARY 22, 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS Contributors iii 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Table 1 Summary of Results by Region 2. BACKGROUND 2 3. RESEARCH M ETHOD 3 4. FINDINGS 4 Table 2 Leased Historic Buildings Housing Federal Courts Table 3 Top Six Federal Tenants in Leased Historic Buildings 5. CONCLUSION 10 6. RECOMMENDATIONS 10 APPENDICES A. GSA Order 570.702 (b): Historic Preference, Aug 1994 14 B. Regional Leasing Questionnaire 15 C. Historic Leased Building Profiles 17 D. Historic Leased Buildings Using/Not Using 10% Preference 19 E. Historic Leased Building Leases Sorted by Size (Rentable s.f.) 20 F. Historic Leased Building Leases Sorted by Lease Value 21 G. Historic Leased Buildings Grouped by Preference Use & Size 22 H. Historic Building Leases: Major Tenants 23 I. Obstacles to Leasing Historic Buildings 25 J. Research Notes by Region 26 ii Contributors Rolando Rivas-Camp Director, Historic Buildings and the Arts Center of Expertise - PNH Authors Caroline Alderson Historic Buildings Program Director – PNH Anne Brockett Historic Preservation Specialist – PNH Project Coordination/Regional Liaison James Del Ciello Historic Buildings and the Arts Center of Expertise – PNH Edward Giefer Center for Urban Development and Livability – PNU Doug Pulak Historic Buildings and the Arts Center of Expertise – PNH Statistics Mohamad Balhis Portfolio Management – PT Stefani Sandow Historical Architect – PNH Regional Case Histories Frank Giblin Center for Urban Development