DOCSLIB.ORG

Goldberg Operations As a Formal Approach to Operations on Polyhedra

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Goldberg Operations As a Formal Approach to Operations on Polyhedra (True) Goldberg operations as a formal approach to operations on polyhedra Gunnar Brinkmann, (Universiteit Gent) Pieter Goetschalckx, (Universiteit Gent) Stan Schein (Univ. of California, Los Angeles) text and pictures by Helmer Aslaksen Faculty of Science and many more. source: wikipedia Faculty of Science The famous Goldberg-Coxeter construction (Figure from Coxeter's paper) Faculty of Science equilateral triangle (3,1) "Goldberg parameters" (0,0) Cut out this triangle. Faculty of Science and glue a copy into each triangle of the icosahedron (or another triangulation) Old vertices keep their degree, new vertices have degree 6. For fullerenes: then take the dual. This idea can also be used to decorate polyhedra where all faces are 4-gons with quadrangles cut out of a quadrangular net so that all 4 sides are equivalent. (Tarnai, Kov´acs,Fowler, Guest) (3,1) For other face sizes or a mixture of triangles and quadrangles it does not work. Faculty of Science Coxeter (1971): \Independently of Michael Goldberg (1937), Caspar and Klug (1963) proposed the following rule for making a suitable pattern". Does this imply or at least suggest that they proposed \the same" rule? So what exactly did Goldberg do? Faculty of Science Let's look at a figure from Goldberg's paper: That's a right triangle { not an equilateral one. Goldberg starts from the dodecahedron and states: \Each pentagonal patch may be divided into ten equal (congruent or symmetric) triangular patches". Faculty of Science Reverse operation: subdivide the pentagons of the dodecahedron and glue copies (half of them mirrors) of the right Goldberg triangle cut out of the hexagonal tiling into it. Convention: original edges, face center to edge center, face center to vertex This approach can be applied to all polyhedra, as every n-gon can be subdivided into 2n coloured triangles: Faculty of Science The result of applying Goldberg's (7; 0) operation to this polyhedron: Faculty of Science Why does it fit at the edges of the triangle? The sides of the triangle are mirror axes! Except at the black dots the situation in the decorated polyhedron is like in the tiling! Faculty of Science Let's look at another figure from Goldberg's paper: No mirror axes { nothing fits! Faculty of Science The sides of the rectangular Goldberg-triangle are mirror axes if and only if the parameters (k; l) fulfill 0 2 fk; lg or k = l: Faculty of Science With two different triangles it would have worked rotation by 180 degrees (5,3) rotation by 60 degrees Faculty of Science Note that this triangle is { though equilateral { quite different from the one used by Caspar and Klug! rotation by 180 degrees (5,3) rotation by 60 degrees Faculty of Science So: • The method known as Goldberg-Coxeter construction is by Caspar and Klug and different from what Goldberg proposed. • The method used by Goldberg is appli- cable in a much more general context than that of Caspar and Klug. Faculty of Science Also the Caspar/Klug (k; l)-operations with 0 62 fk; lg and k 6= l do not preserve all symmetries! Let's for now stick to operations preserving all symmetries. Faculty of Science Reminder: Why do rectangular Goldberg triangles fit at the edges? The sides of the triangle are mirror axes! Let's start from that! Local symmetry preserving operations: • Take any 3-connected periodic tiling T in the plane. • Take any three pairwise intersecting mirror axes forming a right triangle. • Take the interior as the Goldberg right triangle. Faculty of Science Reminder: Blue edges are glued to original edges. An example: 90 o 60 o 30o Faculty of Science In order to be a good definition, it must: • encompass all known operations that are considered to be local symmetry preserv- ing operations • transform polyhedra to polyhedra • be useful and open new directions of research Faculty of Science Dual: to face center to vertex to edge center Faculty of Science Truncate: Faculty of Science Ambo: Faculty of Science Chamfer: . and so on . Faculty of Science Theorem: If a local symmetry preserving operation is applied to a polyhedron (a plane 3-connected graph), the result is a polyhedron. Faculty of Science Usefulness and new directions Faculty of Science In fact we have already seen one useful feature: Everything you prove for the class of local symmetry preserving operations needs not be proven for each element separately! E.g. One doesn't have to prove separately that dual, truncation, ambo, chamfer, quinto, ::: produce (3-connected) polyhedra. Faculty of Science The ratio Ea between the number of edges Eb (or equivalently coloured triangles) after the operation (Ea) and before the operation (Eb) is independent of the polyhedron and is called the inflation factor. Now it is possible to ask for all operations with a given inflation factor. Faculty of Science Symmetry preserving operations preserve the group { that is: don't destroy symmetries { but can also increase it (that is: create new symmetries): ambo Can that also happen for polyhedra that are not self-dual and when the operation can not be written as a product of operations involving ambo? For the torus that is possible (inflation factor 9). for polyhedra we don't know such an example. Faculty of Science Symmetric polyhedra can be seen as redundant: all you need is the fundamental domain and the group tells you how to distribute the content of the fundamental domain. A decorated polyhedron is also redundant: all you need is the decoration and the polyhedron tells you how to distribute it. group $ base polyhedron fundamental domain $ decoration Faculty of Science Algorithmic question: How do you efficiently decide whether a polyhedron is a decoration of a smaller one? Faculty of Science • Thanks for your attention! • Are there questions, proposals, or even answers? Faculty of Science.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Deepdt: Learning Geometry from Delaunay Triangulation for Surface Reconstruction
    The Thirty-Fifth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-21) DeepDT: Learning Geometry From Delaunay Triangulation for Surface Reconstruction Yiming Luo †, Zhenxing Mi †, Wenbing Tao* National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Multi-spectral Information Processing School of Artifical Intelligence and Automation, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, China yiming [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract in In this paper, a novel learning-based network, named DeepDT, is proposed to reconstruct the surface from Delau- Ray nay triangulation of point cloud. DeepDT learns to predict Camera Center inside/outside labels of Delaunay tetrahedrons directly from Point a point cloud and corresponding Delaunay triangulation. The out local geometry features are first extracted from the input point (a) (b) cloud and aggregated into a graph deriving from the Delau- nay triangulation. Then a graph filtering is applied on the ag- gregated features in order to add structural regularization to Figure 1: A 2D example of reconstructing surface by in/out the label prediction of tetrahedrons. Due to the complicated labeling of tetrahedrons. The visibility information is inte- spatial relations between tetrahedrons and the triangles, it is grated into each tetrahedron by intersections between view- impossible to directly generate ground truth labels of tetra- hedrons from ground truth surface. Therefore, we propose a ing rays and tetrahedrons. A graph cuts optimization is ap- multi-label supervision strategy which votes for the label of plied to classify tetrahedrons as inside or outside the sur- a tetrahedron with labels of sampling locations inside it. The face. Result surface is reconstructed by extracting triangular proposed DeepDT can maintain abundant geometry details facets between tetrahedrons of different labels.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Flooring Installation Guidelines
    WOOD FLOORING INSTALLATION GUIDELINES Revised © 2019 NATIONAL WOOD FLOORING ASSOCIATION TECHNICAL PUBLICATION WOOD FLOORING INSTALLATION GUIDELINES 1 INTRODUCTION 87 SUBSTRATES: Radiant Heat 2 HEALTH AND SAFETY 102 SUBSTRATES: Existing Flooring Personal Protective Equipment Fire and Extinguisher Safety 106 UNDERLAYMENTS: Electrical Safety Moisture Control Tool Safety 110 UNDERLAYMENTS: Industry Regulations Sound Control/Acoustical 11 INSTALLATION TOOLS 116 LAYOUT Hand Tools Working Lines Power Tools Trammel Points Pneumatic Tools Transferring Lines Blades and Bits 45° Angles Wall-Layout 19 WOOD FLOORING PRODUCT Wood Flooring Options Center-Layout Trim and Mouldings Lasers Packaging 121 INSTALLATION METHODS: Conversions and Calculations Nail-Down 27 INVOLVED PARTIES 132 INSTALLATION METHODS: 29 JOBSITE CONDITIONS Glue-Down Exterior Climate Considerations 140 INSTALLATION METHODS: Exterior Conditions of the Building Floating Building Thermal Envelope Interior Conditions 145 INSTALLATION METHODS: 33 ACCLIMATION/CONDITIONING Parquet Solid Wood Flooring 150 PROTECTION, CARE Engineered Wood Flooring AND MAINTENANCE Parquet and End-Grain Wood Flooring Educating the Customer Reclaimed Wood Flooring Protection Care 38 MOISTURE TESTING Maintenance Temperature/Relative Humidity What Not to Use Moisture Testing Wood Moisture Testing Wood Subfloors 153 REPAIRS/REPLACEMENT/ Moisture Testing Concrete Subfloors REMOVAL Repair 45 BASEMENTS/CRAWLSPACES Replacement Floating Floor Board Replacement 48 SUBSTRATES: Wood Subfloors Lace-Out/Lace-In Addressing
    [Show full text]
  • Local Symmetry Preserving Operations on Polyhedra
    Local Symmetry Preserving Operations on Polyhedra Pieter Goetschalckx Submitted to the Faculty of Sciences of Ghent University in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Science: Mathematics. Supervisors prof. dr. dr. Kris Coolsaet dr. Nico Van Cleemput Chair prof. dr. Marnix Van Daele Examination Board prof. dr. Tomaž Pisanski prof. dr. Jan De Beule prof. dr. Tom De Medts dr. Carol T. Zamfirescu dr. Jan Goedgebeur © 2020 Pieter Goetschalckx Department of Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics Faculty of Sciences, Ghent University This work is licensed under a “CC BY 4.0” licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en In memory of John Horton Conway (1937–2020) Contents Acknowledgements 9 Dutch summary 13 Summary 17 List of publications 21 1 A brief history of operations on polyhedra 23 1 Platonic, Archimedean and Catalan solids . 23 2 Conway polyhedron notation . 31 3 The Goldberg-Coxeter construction . 32 3.1 Goldberg ....................... 32 3.2 Buckminster Fuller . 37 3.3 Caspar and Klug ................... 40 3.4 Coxeter ........................ 44 4 Other approaches ....................... 45 References ............................... 46 2 Embedded graphs, tilings and polyhedra 49 1 Combinatorial graphs .................... 49 2 Embedded graphs ....................... 51 3 Symmetry and isomorphisms . 55 4 Tilings .............................. 57 5 Polyhedra ............................ 59 6 Chamber systems ....................... 60 7 Connectivity .......................... 62 References
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Deformable Tetrahedral Meshes for 3D Reconstruction
    Learning Deformable Tetrahedral Meshes for 3D Reconstruction Jun Gao1;2;3 Wenzheng Chen1;2;3 Tommy Xiang1;2 Clement Fuji Tsang1 Alec Jacobson2 Morgan McGuire1 Sanja Fidler1;2;3 NVIDIA1 University of Toronto2 Vector Institute3 {jung, wenzchen, txiang, cfujitsang, mcguire, sfidler}@nvidia.com, [email protected] Abstract 3D shape representations that accommodate learning-based 3D reconstruction are an open problem in machine learning and computer graphics. Previous work on neural 3D reconstruction demonstrated benefits, but also limitations, of point cloud, voxel, surface mesh, and implicit function representations. We introduce Deformable Tetrahedral Meshes (DEFTET) as a particular parameterization that utilizes volumetric tetrahedral meshes for the reconstruction problem. Unlike existing volumetric approaches, DEFTET optimizes for both vertex placement and occupancy, and is differentiable with respect to standard 3D reconstruction loss functions. It is thus simultaneously high-precision, volumetric, and amenable to learning-based neural architectures. We show that it can represent arbitrary, complex topology, is both memory and computationally efficient, and can produce high-fidelity reconstructions with a significantly smaller grid size than alternative volumetric approaches. The predicted surfaces are also inherently defined as tetrahedral meshes, thus do not require post-processing. We demonstrate that DEFTET matches or exceeds both the quality of the previous best approaches and the performance of the fastest ones. Our approach obtains high-quality tetrahedral meshes computed directly from noisy point clouds, and is the first to showcase high-quality 3D tet-mesh results using only a single image as input. Our project webpage: https://nv-tlabs.github.io/DefTet/. 1 Introduction High-quality 3D reconstruction is crucial to many applications in robotics, simulation, and VR/AR.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Midas FEA NX
    Introduction to midas FEA NX New Paradigm in Advanced Structural Analysis MIDAS Information Technology Co., Ltd. Contents 1. Overview 2. Geometry Modeling 3. Mesh Generation 4. Analysis 5. Post-processing Configuration Geometry Modeller Report Generator Geometry Modeling and clean-up Various graphic plots and result tables Mesh Generators FEA Post-processor NX Auto, mapped and manual meshing FEM Pre-processor FEM Solvers www.MidasUser.com Analysis Capabilities ◼ Static Analysis ◼ Construction Stage Analysis ◼ Reinforcement Analysis ◼ Buckling Analysis ◼ Eigenvalue Analysis ◼ Response Spectrum Analysis ◼ Time History Analysis(Linear/Nonlinear) ◼ Static Contact Analysis ◼ Interface Nonlinearity Analysis ◼ Nonlinear Analysis(Material/Geometric) ◼ Concrete Crack Analysis ◼ Heat of Hydration Analysis ◼ Heat Transfer Analysis ◼ Slope Stability Analysis ◼ Seepage Analysis ◼ Consolidation Analysis ◼ Coupled Analysis(Fully/Semi) www.MidasUser.com Applicable Problems General Detail Analysis (Linear, Material/Geometry Nonlinear) ◼ General detail FE analysis (linear static/dynamic analysis of concrete and steel) ◼ Buckling analysis of steel structure with material and geometric nonlinearity Concrete and Reinforcement Nonlinear Analysis ◼ Detail analysis of composite structure (steel + concrete) ◼ 3D detail analysis considering steel, concrete and reinforcement simultaneously ◼ Detail analysis of CFT (Concrete Filled Tube) Columns and analysis of the long- term behaviour (differential settlement) ◼ Crack initiation and propagation in concrete structure
    [Show full text]
  • This Is the Accepted Version of the Article: Avci C., Imaz I., Carné-Sánchez A., Pariente JA, Tasios N., Pérez-Carvajal J
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB This is the accepted version of the article: Avci C., Imaz I., Carné-Sánchez A., Pariente J.A., Tasios N., Pérez-Carvajal J., Alonso M.I., Blanco A., Dijkstra M., López C., Maspoch D.. Self-assembly of polyhedral metal-organic framework particles into three-dimensional ordered superstructures. Nature Chemistry, (2018). 10. : 78 - . 10.1038/NCHEM.2875. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/NCHEM.2875 Self-Assembly of Polyhedral Metal-Organic Framework Particles into Three-Dimensional Ordered Superstructures Civan Avci,1 Inhar Imaz,1 Arnau Carné-Sánchez,1 Jose Angel Pariente,2 Nikos Tasios,3 Javier Pérez-Carvajal,1 Maria Isabel Alonso,4 Alvaro Blanco,2 Marjolein Dijkstra,3 Cefe Lopez,2* and Daniel Maspoch1,5* 1 Catalan Institute of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology (ICN2), CSIC and The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Campus UAB, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain 2 Materials Science Factory, Instituto de Ciencia de Materiales de Madrid (ICMM), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Calle Sor Juana Inés de la Cruz, 3, 28049 Madrid, Spain 3 Soft Condensed Matter, Debye Institute for Nanomaterials Science, Utrecht University, Princetonplein 5, 3584 CC Utrecht, the Netherlands 4 Institut de Ciència de Materials de Barcelona (ICMAB-CSIC), Campus UAB, 08193 Bellaterra, Spain 5 ICREA, Pg. Lluís Companys 23, 08010 Barcelona, Spain *Correspondence to: [email protected], [email protected] 1 Self-assembly of particles into long-range, three-dimensional, ordered superstructures is crucial for the bottom-up design of plasmonic sensing materials, energy or gas storage systems, catalysts, and photonic crystals.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldberg, Fuller, Caspar, Klug and Coxeter and a General Approach to Local Symmetry-Preserving Operations
    Goldberg, Fuller, Caspar, Klug and Coxeter and a general approach to local symmetry-preserving operations Gunnar Brinkmann1, Pieter Goetschalckx1, Stan Schein2 1Applied Mathematics, Computer Science and Statistics Ghent University Krijgslaan 281-S9 9000 Ghent, Belgium 2California Nanosystems Institute and Department of Psychology University of California Los Angeles, CA 90095 [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. (Received ...) Abstract Cubic polyhedra with icosahedral symmetry where all faces are pentagons or hexagons have been studied in chemistry and biology as well as mathematics. In chemistry one of these is buckminsterfullerene, a pure carbon cage with maximal symmetry, whereas in biology they describe the structure of spherical viruses. Parameterized operations to construct all such polyhedra were first described by Goldberg in 1937 in a mathematical context and later by Caspar and Klug – not knowing about Goldberg’s work – in 1962 in a arXiv:1705.02848v1 [math.CO] 8 May 2017 biological context. In the meantime Buckminster Fuller also used subdivided icosahedral structures for the construction of his geodesic domes. In 1971 Coxeter published a survey article that refers to these constructions. Subsequently, the literature often refers to the Goldberg-Coxeter construction. This construction is actually that of Caspar and Klug. Moreover, there are essential differences between this (Caspar/Klug/Coxeter) approach and the approaches of Fuller and of Goldberg. We will sketch the different approaches and generalize Goldberg’s approach to a systematic one encompassing all local symmetry- preserving operations on polyhedra. Keywords: polyhedra, symmetry preserving, chamber system, Goldberg-Coxeter operation Author’s contributions: All authors contributed critically in ideas and writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Distance Functions on Three-Dimensional Grids
    Accepted Manuscript Digital distance functions on three-dimensional grids Robin Strand, Benedek Nagy, Gunilla Borgefors PII: S0304-3975(10)00589-X DOI: 10.1016/j.tcs.2010.10.027 Reference: TCS 8041 To appear in: Theoretical Computer Science Please cite this article as: R. Strand, B. Nagy, G. Borgefors, Digital distance functions on three-dimensional grids, Theoretical Computer Science (2010), doi:10.1016/j.tcs.2010.10.027 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. Asa service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Manuscript Digital Distance Functions on Three-Dimensional Grids a, b c Robin Strand ∗, Benedek Nagy , Gunilla Borgefors aCentre for Image Analysis, Uppsala University, Sweden bDepartment of Computer Science, Faculty of Informatics, University of Debrecen, Hungary cCentre for Image Analysis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden Abstract In this paper, we examine five different three-dimensional grids suited for image processing. Digital distance functions are defined on the cubic, face- centered cubic, body-centered cubic, honeycomb, and diamond grids. We give the parameters that minimize an error function that favors distance functions with low rotational dependency. We also give an algorithm for computing the distance transform – the tool by which these distance func- tions can be applied in image processing applications.
    [Show full text]
  • View This Volume's Front and Back Matter
    I: Mathematics Koryo Miura Toshikazu Kawasaki Tomohiro Tachi Ryuhei Uehara Robert J. Lang Patsy Wang-Iverson Editors http://dx.doi.org/10.1090/mbk/095.1 6 Origami I. Mathematics AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 6 Origami I. Mathematics Proceedings of the Sixth International Meeting on Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education Koryo Miura Toshikazu Kawasaki Tomohiro Tachi Ryuhei Uehara Robert J. Lang Patsy Wang-Iverson Editors AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary 00-XX, 01-XX, 51-XX, 52-XX, 53-XX, 68-XX, 70-XX, 74-XX, 92-XX, 97-XX, 00A99. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data International Meeting of Origami Science, Mathematics, and Education (6th : 2014 : Tokyo, Japan) Origami6 / Koryo Miura [and five others], editors. volumes cm “International Conference on Origami Science and Technology . Tokyo, Japan . 2014”— Introduction. Includes bibliographical references and index. Contents: Part 1. Mathematics of origami—Part 2. Origami in technology, science, art, design, history, and education. ISBN 978-1-4704-1875-5 (alk. paper : v. 1)—ISBN 978-1-4704-1876-2 (alk. paper : v. 2) 1. Origami—Mathematics—Congresses. 2. Origami in education—Congresses. I. Miura, Koryo, 1930– editor. II. Title. QA491.I55 2014 736.982–dc23 2015027499 Copying and reprinting. Individual readers of this publication, and nonprofit libraries acting for them, are permitted to make fair use of the material, such as to copy select pages for use in teaching or research. Permission is granted to quote brief passages from this publication in reviews, provided the customary acknowledgment of the source is given. Republication, systematic copying, or multiple reproduction of any material in this publication is permitted only under license from the American Mathematical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Graph Theoretic and Electronic Properties of Fullerenes, &, Biasing
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. Graph Theoretic and Electronic Properties of Fullerenes & Biasing Molecular Modelling Simulations with Experimental Residual Dipolar Couplings Lukas N Wirz 2015 A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Massey University, Albany New Zealand Contents iii Contents I Graph theoretical and electronic properties of fulle- renes 1 1 Introduction 5 1.1 A Short Introduction to Graph Theory and Embeddings . 9 1.2 Drawing fullerene graphs: Methods for planar embedding . 13 1.3 The large isomer space ....................... 15 1.4 Generation of fullerene graphs .................. 16 1.5 Transformation of fullerene graphs ................ 17 1.6 Geometry of Fullerenes ...................... 23 1.7 Generating accurate 3D geometries ................ 26 1.8 Fullerene symmetry ........................ 28 1.9 Shapes: Volume and surface area, sphericity and convexity . 33 1.10 Topological and chemical indicators ............... 37 1.11 Perfect matchings and their molecular application ....... 46 1.12 Thermodynamic stability and the graphene limit ....... 51 1.13 Electronic aspects to structure and stability ........... 56 1.14 The gas phase formation of fullerenes .............. 57 2 Program Fullerene: A Software Package for Constructing and Ana- lyzing Structures of Regular Fullerenes 61 2.1 Introduction ............................. 61 2.2 General structure and history of the program Fullerene .... 64 2.33D structure generation ...................... 65 2.4 Goldberg-Coxeter transformation ................. 68 2.5 Stone Wales transformation and vertex insertions ......
    [Show full text]
  • Medial Axis LUT Computation for Chamfer Norms Using H-Polytopes
    Medial Axis LUT Computation for Chamfer Norms Using H-Polytopes Nicolas Normand and Pierre Evenou´ IRCCyN UMR CNRS 6597, Ecole´ polytechnique de l’Universit´edeNantes, Rue Christian Pauc, La Chantrerie, 44306 Nantes Cedex 3, France [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Chamfer distances are discrete distances based on the prop- agation of local distances, or weights defined in a mask. The medial axis, i.e. the centers of the maximal disks (disks which are not contained in any other disk), is a powerful tool for shape representation and analysis. The extraction of maximal disks is performed in the general case with comparison tests involving look-up tables representing the covering re- lation of disks in a local neighborhood. Although look-up table values can be computed efficiently [1], the computation of the look-up table neighborhood tend to be very time-consuming. By using polytope [2] de- scriptions of the chamfer disks, the necessary operations to extract the look-up tables are greatly reduced. 1 Introduction ThedistancetransformDTX of a binary image X is a function that maps each point x with its distance to the background i.e. with the radius of the largest open disk centered in x included in the image. Such a disk is said to be maximal if no other disk included in X contains it. The set of centers of maximal disks, the medial axis, is a convenient description of binary images for many applications ranging from image coding to shape recognition. Its attractive properties are reversibility and (relative) compactness.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Deformable Tetrahedral Meshes for 3D Reconstruction
    Appendix: Learning Deformable Tetrahedral Meshes for 3D Reconstruction Jun Gao1;2;3 Wenzheng Chen1;2;3 Tommy Xiang1;2 Clement Fuji Tsang1 Alec Jacobson2 Morgan McGuire1 Sanja Fidler1;2;3 NVIDIA1 University of Toronto2 Vector Institute3 {jung, wenzchen, txiang, cfujitsang, mcguire, sfidler}@nvidia.com, [email protected] In Appendix, we first provide details and ablations about the regularization terms we employed in training our DEFTET in Sec. 1. Details about the network architecture we used in different applications are provided in Sec. 2. We show additional experimental details and results in Sec. 3. 1 Explanations and Ablations of Loss Functions In this section, we first provide explanations about different regularizers we employed in the main paper, and we provide ablation studies of different regularization terms. The notation follows the main paper. 1.1 Explanations The Laplacian loss, Llap, penalizes the change in relative positions of neighboring vertices to encour- age the deformed tetrahedron to keep the initial regularity: N 1 X 1 X 2 L = ∆ − ∆ 0 ; (1) lap N vi jN (v )j v i 0 i=1 v 2N (vi) T where N (vi) denotes the neighbors of vertex vi, and ∆vi = [∆xi; ∆yi; ∆zi] . The Delta Loss, Ldel, encourages the deformation to be local by penalizing large deformation for each of the vertices: N 1 X L = j∆ j2: (2) del N vi i=1 We want the tetrahedral mesh to remain as regular as possible. The EquiVolume loss, Lvol, encourages each deformed tetrahedrons to have similar volume and avoids flipped tetrahedrons, whose volume is negative, by penalizing the differences in volume for each tetrahedron: K 1 X L = jV − V j4; (3) vol K k k=1 where Vk is the volume of tetrahedron Tk and V is the average volume.
    [Show full text]