DOCSLIB.ORG

ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS for Truck with Air Stairs Last Revision: 1/11/18

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS for Truck with Air Stairs Last Revision: 1/11/18 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Sourcing Event: 0000000591 Requisition 0000026994 Budget Number: 5ACPFC7E Vehicle # 72500924, 72500925 Approved by: ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR Truck with Air Stairs Last revision: 1/11/18 1 SECTION 1 - GENERAL EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS: 2 3 SPECIFICATION OUTLINE: 4 The following specification is for two (2) Air Stairs. The first section outlines the overall specification 5 requirement. The second section details the chassis requirements. The third section details the body 6 requirements. The Air Stair Vehicles are to be delivered complete with all specified equipment and 7 accessories necessary for safe and efficient operation, and ready for immediate job site operation for the 8 City and County of San Francisco. The Air Stairs units specified are to be used for Airport Operations. 9 10 DEFINITION OF TERMS: 11 City and County of San Francisco and the San Francisco International Airport, a City Department, 12 hereinafter shall be referred to as the “City” or “CCSF.” 13 14 MANUFACTURING, MATERIAL AND DESIGN PRACTICES: 15 It is intended that the manufacturer, in the selection of components, are to use material and design practices 16 that are the best available in the industry for the type of operating conditions to which the unit(s) will be 17 subjected. Engine, suspension, wheels, tires and other component parts shall be selected to address the 18 performance requirements of this specification. All parts, equipment and accessories shall conform in 19 strength, quality of material and workmanship to recognized industry standards. 20 21 HEAVY DUTY TERMINOLOGY DEFINED: 22 The term “heavy duty” as used in these specifications shall mean that the item to which the term is applied 23 shall exceed the usual quantity, quality or capacity supplied with standard production unit(s) and it shall 24 be able to withstand unusual strain, exposure, temperature, wear and use. 25 26 ALTERNATES: 27 When the specific name of a manufacturer, brand or make, with or without model number, is used in 28 describing any item in this specification, bids for similar articles will be considered unless otherwise 29 stated. Bidders may also propose items of equivalent features, or manufacturer’s updated part or part 30 number. Purchasing shall be the sole judge as to whether such alternate articles are acceptable. Unless 31 bidder states to the contrary, articles offered will be assumed to be the specific article named in this 32 specification. If not offering the specific article named, bidder must enclose with its bid full information, 33 specifications and descriptive data on alternate items offered. Purchasing reserves the right to permit 34 deviations from the specifications if any article offered is substantially in accord with Purchasing’s 35 specifications and is deemed by Purchasing to be of as good quality and as fully satisfactory for its 36 intended use. Bidder is responsible for identifying any deviations from Purchasing’s specifications. 37 Bidders should not assume an alternate offered is an approved equal. The City will evaluate the alternate 38 and inform the bidder if the alternate is acceptable. Purchasing must approve all alternates. 39 1 of 20 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Sourcing Event: 0000000591 Requisition 0000026994 Budget Number: 5ACPFC7E Vehicle # 72500924, 72500925 Approved by: ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR Truck with Air Stairs Last revision: 1/11/18 40 CONDITIONAL MODIFICATIONS: 41 Potential variances of a specific truck manufacturer’s chassis may require variances in the body mounting 42 and design to some degree. Therefore, bidders shall clearly and completely outline all areas needing such 43 modifications. 44 45 GENERALITIES: 46 To allow for manufacturer’s specific designs, and ensure a level of competitiveness, we have left certain 47 areas of our specifications general by design. In such cases, the items being referred to may be general, 48 but adherence to the requested end product and/or result must be met. This is especially important in areas 49 where critical dimensions, capacities, grades of steel, etc. are specified. In the cases where the word 50 “SHALL” is used, no substitutions are to be allowed. 51 52 PRE-BID CONFERENCE: 53 There will not be a Pre-Bid Conference, so it is requested that bidder’s questions concerning this bid be 54 submitted by email at least five (5) days before the bid due date to: 55 56 Maria Sio, Senior Purchaser 57 Email: [email protected] 58 59 Any change or addition to the requirements contained in this Bid as a result of any questions will be 60 executed by written Bid Addendum. 61 62 MANUFACTURER'S SPECIFICATION: 63 Complete manufacturer’s specification, published literature and photos or illustrations of unit proposed, 64 should be furnished with bid. Only new models in current production and in service that are catalogued 65 by the manufacturer and for which printed literature and specifications are available will be accepted. 66 Bidders should prepare and submit their own proposals addressing each section, item or component of 67 these specifications if they differ from these specifications. These shall indicate full compliance without 68 exception, or explain in detail any exceptions or deviations. Bidders should not simply submit a copy of 69 these specifications if they differ from these specifications, nor should they submit copies of manufacturer 70 or third party quotations as a response to the City’s bid solicitation. An MSDS ( Safety Data Sheet) shall 71 be supplied for all fluids used. 72 73 74 MANUFACTURER'S STANDARD EQUIPMENT: 75 All equipment and components listed as standard by the manufacturer for model quoted shall be furnished 76 whether or not such items are detailed herein, e.g., special wrenches, tool kits, etc. Optional equipment 77 as necessary to meet the following requirements of this specification shall also be supplied. Should the 78 requirements as specified not comply, the manufacturer is required to re-figure and revise the 2 of 20 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Sourcing Event: 0000000591 Requisition 0000026994 Budget Number: 5ACPFC7E Vehicle # 72500924, 72500925 Approved by: ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR Truck with Air Stairs Last revision: 1/11/18 79 specifications to meet all laws, rules and regulations where it applies to items such as the ratings of axles, 80 tires, rims, brakes, batteries, cooling capacity, etc. and the City and County of San Francisco are to be 81 notified thereof. 82 83 APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS AND CERTIFICATIONS: 84 Specifications on the following pages are written with the intent to comply with all applicable documents 85 and certifications, but the final responsibility to comply shall rest with the vendor and not the City and 86 County of San Francisco. The successful bidder shall adhere to the standards set forth by the following 87 agencies: 88 89 • Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Department of Transportation. 90 • State of California Motor Vehicle Code. 91 • State of California General Industrial Safety Orders. 92 • State of California Health and Safety Code, Motor Vehicle Pollution Control. 93 • California Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and the EPA 94 • Society of Automotive Engineering Standards. 95 • American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). 96 • American National Safety Institute (ANSI). 97 • Vehicle must be compliant with California Administrative Code (C.A.C.) Title 13. 98 99 DEMONSTRATIONS: 100 The City reserves the option to request, and the bidder shall agree to provide, an “on the job” 101 demonstration and evaluation for the City’s Fleet Management personnel before acceptance of contract in 102 the event the City is not familiar with the performance of the unit offered. If requested by the City, a 103 demonstrator unit shall be made available prior to award and provided at no additional cost to the City. 104 Time required for such evaluation shall be as determined by the City. 105 106 OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARD: 107 Noise level shall be in conformance with standards established by Local, State, and Federal agencies. City 108 personnel, for noise requirements, may test each unit delivered before the unit is accepted. 109 110 HOSE AND WIRE ROUTING, HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS: 111 All hoses and wiring shall have adequate protective covers wherever there is a possibility of contact with 112 any other components. Separators shall be used where applicable. No tape or adhesive fasteners are to 113 be accepted. All hoses, wiring and pipes shall be routed to be clear of all heat sources and shall be 114 protected from any present or potential source of snags, abrasions or sharp edges. All hydraulic lines and 115 hose shall be specifically manufactured for hydraulic use. If any wiring for any lamps are routed through 116 any tool compartment or canopy, these wires shall be enclosed in steel. All fasteners (nut, bolts, rivets & 117 etc.) shall be grade 5 or better with a rust inhibiting coating. Several applications must have grade 8. 3 of 20 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Sourcing Event: 0000000591 Requisition 0000026994 Budget Number: 5ACPFC7E Vehicle # 72500924, 72500925 Approved by: ATTACHMENT C EQUIPMENT SPECIFICATIONS FOR Truck with Air Stairs Last revision: 1/11/18 118 WELDING: 119 All welding shall be continuous where applicable. All welding shall be performed in accordance with the 120 applicable requirements of the latest codes, rules or specifications of the American Welding Society, 121 (AWS), and the requirements of these specifications and special provisions, shall be subject to the test and 122 examinations therein specified. 123 124 SWITCHES, LABELS: 125 All toggle and push button switches shall be marine type with additional rubber boots. All controls, 126 warning gauges and valves shall be marked as to function with stamped or engraved stainless steel or 127 aluminum labels. These labels shall be attached by aluminum and/or stainless steel rivets.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aviation Occurrence Report Fire in Baggage
    AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT FIRE IN BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT INTER CANADIEN FOKKER F-28 MK 1000 C-FCRI JEAN LESAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, QUEBEC 05 DECEMBER 1995 REPORT NUMBER A95Q0232 The Transportation Safety Board of Canada (TSB) investigated this occurrence for the purpose of advancing transportation safety. It is not the function of the Board to assign fault or determine civil or criminal liability. AVIATION OCCURRENCE REPORT FIRE IN BAGGAGE COMPARTMENT INTER CANADIEN FOKKER F-28 MK 1000 C-FCRI JEAN LESAGE INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, QUEBEC 05 DECEMBER 1995 REPORT NUMBER A95Q0232 Summary Inter Canadien flight 668 from Montreal, a Fokker F-28 MK 1000, parked at boarding gate 3 of Jean Lesage International Airport, Quebec City. The attendant opened the forward baggage compartment and saw thick white smoke and reddish flames coming out of the compartment. He immediately closed the door and alerted the crew. The pilot-in-command immediately ordered the evacuation of the aircraft and told the co-pilot to notify emergency services. The passengers were evacuated rapidly via the airstair at the left forward door and the evacuation slide at the right forward door. The airport fire-fighters arrived at the scene. They checked the baggage compartment and saw the flames. Fire-fighters equipped with respirators fought the fire inside the baggage compartment using extinguishers. One fire-fighter discharged a dry chemical extinguisher in the baggage compartment then closed the door to suffocate the fire. When the fire was extinguished, the fire-fighter entered the baggage compartment and removed the fire-damaged baggage. The aircraft was inspected, and was ferried that evening to the company maintenance base at Montreal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Structure of the Global Large Civil Aircraft Industry and Market: Implications for the Competitiveness of the U.S
    ABSTRACT On September 23, 1997, at the request of the House Committee on Ways and Means (Committee),1 the United States International Trade Commission (Commission) instituted investigation No. 332-384, The Changing Structure of the Global Large Civil Aircraft Industry and Market: Implications for the Competitiveness of the U.S. Industry, under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930, for the purpose of exploring recent developments in the global large civil aircraft (LCA) industry and market. As requested by the Committee, the Commission’s report on the investigation is similar in scope to the report submitted to the Senate Committee on Finance by the Commission in August 1993, initiated under section 332(g) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (USITC inv. No. 332-332, Global Competitiveness of U.S. Advanced-Technology Manufacturing Industries: Large Civil Aircraft, Publication 2667) and includes the following information: C A description of changes in the structure of the global LCA industry, including the Boeing-McDonnell Douglas merger, the restructuring of Airbus Industrie, the emergence of Russian producers, and the possibility of Asian parts suppliers forming consortia to manufacture complete airframes; C A description of developments in the global market for aircraft, including the emergence of regional jet aircraft and proposed jumbo jets, and issues involving Open Skies and free flight; C A description of the implementation and status of the 1992 U.S.-EU Large Civil Aircraft Agreement; C A description of other significant developments that affect the competitiveness of the U.S. LCA industry; and C An analysis of the aforementioned structural changes in the LCA industry and market to assess the impact of these changes on the competitiveness of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Cabin Crew Safety January-February 2000
    F L I G H T S A F E T Y F O U N D A T I O N CABIN CREW SAFETY Vol. 35 No. 1 For Everyone Concerned with the Safety of Flight January–February 2000 Working in, Around Aircraft Cabins Requires Awareness of Fall Prevention The availability of limited data on slips, trips and falls during normal aircraft operations complicates efforts to improve the prevention of injury to crewmembers and passengers in the cabin environment. Nevertheless, airlines periodically should review fall-prevention strategies and related training of flight attendants and other workers. FSF Editorial Staff In most contexts, being injured by a fall simply study by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics said means that the force of gravity caused a person’s that falls were the most common “injury and downward motion and injury occurred when illness cases by event or exposure” for pilots, most the moving person suddenly decelerated by striking involving walkways, stairs and vehicles. Falls were a surface or an object. When aircraft are in flight the third most common such event for flight or in motion on the ground, a variety of factors attendants, most involving walkways and stairs.1 can contribute to falls. For example, accident/ incident reports have identified factors such as In the early 1990s, researchers attempting to study turbulence, autopilot malfunctions, aircraft fatal falls in the workplace encountered difficulty upsets, sudden evasive maneuvers by flight crews, identifying such occurrences in most industries.2 aircraft collisions with airport structures, collisions Researchers have found that the available data do between ground vehicles and aircraft, and sudden not specify the circumstances for a large proportion braking while a flight crew is taxiing the of falls.3 Similarly, little public data and few studies aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Apm-1346 08 December 2003 Revision 17 - 09 October 2015
    EMBRAER S.A - P.O. BOX 8050 12227-901 SAO JOSE DOS CAMPOS - S.P. BRAZIL PHONE:++55123927-7517 FAX:++55123927-7546 http://www.embraer.com e-mail: [email protected] AIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL In connection with the use of this document, Embraer does not provide any express or implied warranties and expressly disclaims any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. This document contains trade secrets, confidential, proprietary information of Embraer and technical data subject to U.S. Export Administration Regulation (″EAR″) and other countries export control laws and regulations. Diversion contrary to the EAR and other laws regulations is strictly forbidden. The above restrictions may apply to data on all pages of this document. APM-1346 08 DECEMBER 2003 REVISION 17 - 09 OCTOBER 2015 Copyright © 2015 by EMBRAER S.A. All rights reserved. EMBRAER S.A. AV. BRIGADEIRO FARIA LIMA, 2.170 - CAIXA POSTAL 8050 - TELEFONE (55) 12 39277517 FAX (55) 12 39277546 - CEP 12.227-901 - SÃO JOSÉ DOS CAMPOS - SÃO PAULO - BRASIL e-mail: [email protected] - http://www.embraer.com TO: HOLDERS OF PUBLICATION No. APM-1346 - ″AIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL″. FRONT MATTER - REVISION No. 17 DATED OCTOBER 09/2015 Pages which have been added, revised, or deleted by the current revision are indicated by an asterisk, on the List of Effective Pages. This issue incorporates all preceding Temporary Revisions (if any). Modifications introduced by this revision are all editorial in nature, with no technical implications, they not being therefore highlighted and no substantiation source being presented herein. Page1of2 HIGHLIGHTS Oct 09/15 AIRPORT PLANNING MANUAL RECORD OF REVISIONS The user must update the Record of Revisions when a revision is put into the manual.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Alerting Systems Criteria Study Volume I Collation and Analysis of Aircraft Alerting System Data
    COP.~~:• :.l. ll.L J Report No. FAA RD-~~-2E._I.__._ Aircraft Alerting Systems Criteria Study Volume I Collation and Analysis of Aircraft Alerting System Data FAA WJH Technic?-1 Center Tech Center Library Atlantic City' NJ 08405 .... lRntARl" •20 ?7! 06-44199 May 1977 FINAL REPORT Document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161. Prepared for FAA RD-76/222 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION v.I FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Systems Research & Development Service • Washington, D.C. 20590 FM Technical Center 11111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 *00017870* NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for its contents or use thereof. FAAfRD- 76/222vI Aircraft alerting systems criteria study, volume II collation and analysis of aircraft alerting system data/ v.I ~_J 1. Report No. 12. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. FAA-RD-76-222. I 4. Title and Su.btitle 5. Report Date Aircraft Alerting Systems Criteria Study May 1977 Volume I: Collation and Analysis of Aircraft 6. Performing Organization Code Alerting Systems Data 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. - J.E. Veitengruber, G. P. Boucek Jr., and W. D. Smith 10. Work Unit No. 9. Performing Organization Name and Address A TC/Electronics Technology-Crew Systems 11. Contract or Grant No. Boeing Commercial Airplane Company P.O. Box 3707, Seattle, Washington 98124 DOT/FA 73WA-3233-MOD 2 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address · inal Report Systems Research and Development Service T<inn<ir" 1 07h-l\TovP.mhP.r 1976 Federal Aviation Administration 14.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 81, No. 13/Thursday, January 21
    Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 13 / Thursday, January 21, 2016 / Rules and Regulations 3313 Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on January 6, 4000; fax 416–375–4539; email cracks, if not detected, could propagate to 2016. [email protected]; result in the structural failure of the steps. Bruce E. Cain, Internet http://www.bombardier.com. In the event of an emergency egress situation, the failure of the airstair step Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, You may view this referenced service assembly could impede the evacuation of Aircraft Certification Service. information at the FAA, Transport passengers. [FR Doc. 2016–00664 Filed 1–20–16; 8:45 am] Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue This [Canadian] AD mandates the BILLING CODE 4910–13–P SW., Renton, WA. For information on replacement of the affected forward the availability of this material at the passenger airstair step assembly with a new FAA, call 425–227–1221. It is also or reworked step assembly. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION available on the Internet at http:// Revision 1 of this [Canadian] AD provides www.regulations.gov by searching for additional instructions for performing an Federal Aviation Administration and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– electronic tap test of the airstair step 0447. assembly if the Serial Number (S/N) of the 14 CFR Part 39 airstair step assembly cannot be found. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: [Docket No. FAA–2014–0447; Directorate Required actions include an Jeffrey Zimmer, Aerospace Engineer, inspection to determine the serial Identifier 2014–NM–019–AD; Amendment Airframe and Mechanical Systems 39–18368; AD 2016–01–09] number of the airstair door step Branch, ANE–171, FAA, New York assembly, and if necessary, an electronic RIN 2120–AA64 Aircraft Certification Office, 1600 tap test and reidentification and Stewart Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, replacement of the assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • AC 150/5220-21C, Aircraft Boarding Equipment, 29 June 2012
    Advisory U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Circular Administration Subject: Aircraft Boarding Equipment Date: 6/29/2012 AC No: 150/5220-21C Initiated by: AAS-100 Change: 1. PURPOSE. This advisory circular (AC) contains the Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA’s) performance standards, specifications, and recommendations for the design, manufacture, testing and maintenance of equipment used in the boarding of airline passengers. 2. CANCELLATION. This AC cancels AC 150/5220-21B, Guide Specification for Devices Used to Board Airline Passengers with Mobility Impairments, dated March 17, 2000. 3. SCOPE. This AC covers the four most common pieces of equipment used to board aircraft: a. Passenger boarding bridges (PBBs) that are entered from the passenger terminal boarding area, b. Ramps that are moved into place to allow boarding from the airport apron, c. Lifts to vertically transport passengers from the airport apron to the door of the aircraft, and d. Aircraft boarding chairs used to transfer passengers from their wheelchair or other apparatus to their seat in the aircraft cabin. The physical area covered in this AC is that which is bounded by the door of the passenger terminal area, on one end, to the door of the aircraft, on the other end. Although this AC refers only to aircraft boarding (enplaning), all references apply equally to disembarking (deplaning) with the described procedures occurring in reverse order. Chapters 3-5 for this AC are primarily based on the performance standards, specifications, and recommendations contained in the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) 1247, General Requirements for Aerospace Ground Support Equipment (Motorized and Non-motorized), U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Another Approach to Enhance Airline Safety: Using Management Safety Tools
    Journal of Air Transportation Vol. 11, No. 1 -2006 ANOTHER APPROACH TO ENHANCE AIRLINE SAFETY: USING MANAGEMENT SAFETY TOOLS Chien-tsung Lu Central Missouri State University Michael Wetmore Central Missouri State University Robert Przetak Central Missouri State University Warrensburg, Missouri ABSTRACT The ultimate goal of conducting an accident investigation is to prevent similar accidents from happening again and to make operations safer system-wide. Based on the findings extracted from the investigation, the “lesson learned” becomes a genuine part of the safety database making risk management available to safety analysts. The airline industry is no exception. In the US, the FAA has advocated the usage of the System Safety concept in enhancing safety since 2000. Yet, in today’s usage of System Safety, the airline industry mainly focuses on risk management, which is a reactive process of the System Safety discipline. In order to extend the merit of System Safety and to prevent accidents beforehand, a specific System Safety tool needs to be applied; so a model of hazard prediction can be formed. To do so, the authors initiated this study by reviewing 189 final accident reports from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) covering FAR Part 121 scheduled operations. The discovered accident causes (direct hazards) were categorized into 10 groups― Flight Operations, Ground Crew, Turbulence, Maintenance, Foreign Object Damage (FOD), Flight Attendant, Air Traffic Control, Manufacturer, Passenger, and Federal Aviation Administration. These direct hazards were associated with 36 root factors prepared for an error-elimination model using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA), a leading tool for System Safety experts. An FTA block-diagram model was created, followed by a probability simulation of accidents.
    [Show full text]
  • Transportation Safety Board Aircraft Accident Report Continental Airlines
    TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT REPORT CONTINENTAL AIRLINES / AIR MICRONESIA, INC. BOEING 727-92C, N18479 YAP AIRPORT YAP, WESTERN CAROLINE ISLANDS NOVEMBER 21, 1980 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT c.5 I TECHNICAL REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE 1. Report No. 2.Government Accession No. 3.Recipient's Catalog No. NTSB-AAR-81-7 PB81-910407 Titleand Subti Continental Airlines/Air Micronesia, '' 5.ReportMa 27, 1981Date lnc., Boeing 727-92C, N18479, Yap Airport, Yap, Western 6.Performing Organization 21, Caroline Islands, November 1980 Code 1. Author(s) 8.Performing Organization Report No. 3. Performing 0rganization:Name and Address 1O.Work Unit No. 3261 National Transportation Safety Board Bureau of Accident Investigation 11.Contract or Grant No. 20594 Washington, D.C. 13.Type of Report and Period Covered 12.Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Aircraft Accident Report November 21, 1980 NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD Waqhington, D. C. 20594 14.Sponsoring Agency Code 15.Supplementary Notes The subject report was distributed to NTSB mailing lists: lA, 8A and 8B. I6.Abstract b At 0952 local time, on November 21, 1980, Continental Airlines/Air Micronesia, Inc., Flight 614, a Boeing 727-92C, N18479, crashed while attempting to land on runway 7 at Yap Airport, Yap, Western Caroline Islands. The aircraft touched down 13 feet short of the runway and the right main landing gear immediately separated from the aircraft. The aircraft gradually veered off the runway and came to rest in the jungle about 1,700 feet beyond the initial touchdown. Fire erupted along the right side of the aircraft as it came to a stop. All 73 Occupants (67 passengers and 6 crewmembers) escaped before fire destroyed the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • SEASTAR HOLDINGS, INC., Et Al. Debtors
    Case 18-10039-CSS Doc 78 Filed 01/23/18 Page 1 of 263 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 SEASTAR HOLDINGS, INC., et al.1 Case No. 18-10039 (CSS) Debtors. (Jointly Administered) SCHEDULES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES AND STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL AFFAIRS GLOBAL NOTES These Global Notes and Disclaimers (the “Global Notes”) regarding the Schedules of Assets and Liabilities (the “Schedules”) and Statements of Financial Affairs (the “SOFA” and together with Schedules, the “Schedules and SOFA”) for SeaStar Holdings, Inc. and its chapter 11 affiliates set forth in footnote one herein (each a “Debtor,” and collectively, the “Debtors” or the “Company”) are incorporated by reference in, and comprise an integral part of, the Schedules and SOFA, and should be referred to and reviewed in connection with any review of the Schedules and SOFA. 1. The Schedules and SOFA have been prepared by the Company’s management and are unaudited. While management of the Company has made every effort to ensure that the Schedules and SOFA are accurate and complete based on information that was available at the time of preparation, the subsequent receipt of information may result in material changes to the financial data contained in the Schedules and SOFA, and inadvertent errors or omissions may exist. To the extent the Company discovers a material error or omission, or becomes aware of additional information that may suggest a material difference, the Company will amend the Schedules or SOFA to reflect such changes. Accordingly, the Company does not make any representation or warranty as to the completeness or accuracy of the information set forth herein and reserves all rights to amend the Schedules or SOFA as may be necessary or appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • The A220 in Canada AIR CANADA WELCOMES C-GROV
    AN MHM PUBLISHING MAGAZINE // FEBRUARY/MARCH 2020 COVER STORY The A220 in Canada AIR CANADA WELCOMES C-GROV SKIESMAG.COM TO THE FLEET ALSO WestJet Primed to Compete CEO ED SIMS TALKS WITH SKIES ABOUT POST-ONEX OPPORTUNITIES Electri-Flying WHAT’S NEXT FOR THE DHC-2 BEAVER ‘ePLANE?’ Hot Wings CONAIR GROUP PREPARES FOR THE FUTURE OF AERIAL FIREFIGHTING Stylish Versatility COME ALONG AS WE FLY DAHER’S KODIAK 100 ON AMPHIBIOUS FLOATS CANADA’S AVIATION & Alone in the Air AEROSPACE AUTHORITY MEET DAVE OLESEN, THE TEXTBOOK DEFINITION OF NORTHERN BUSH PILOT It flies in private props, commercial jets, and in the face of convention. Introducing the next generation DC PRO-X2. Conventional wisdom says rest-on-ear headsets are just for THE NEXT GEN the quiet flight decks of commercial airliners. But the next generation DC PRO-X2 is not your conventional rest-on-ear style headset. The DC PRO-X2 offers enhanced audio performance and ANR technology along with the unmatched, lightweight comfort of a rest-on-ear headset design – for both private and commercial pilots. And that conventional wisdom? Well, that flies out the window. For more information or to purchase online, visit www.davidclark.com. © 2019 David Clark Company Incorporated An Employee Owned ® Green headset domes are a David Clark registered trademark. WWW.DAVIDCLARK.COM American Company 230-36580REV1 X2Conv 8375X1075SKIES.indd 1 2/4/20 1:03 PM IS THERE A CLOSER AIRPORT? YES, BUT ONLY YOU CAN ACCESS IT! The world’s first Super Versatile Jet takes off! It’s simple – you fly business aircraft to save time.
    [Show full text]
  • Aircraft Familiarization Narrow Body Aircraft
    Does My Airport Need One? Eric Johansen, DFW Airport Review history of aircraft ingress/egress Discuss the reasons for emergency evacuations Review the reasons for non-emergency evacuations Discuss the options for evacuation Compare various manufacturers of AIAVs 1925 Eastern Ford Trimotor 1940s – 1960s Convair 340 2000s Boeing 777 Bomb Threat/ Isolated AC Crash/Alert III Medical Emergencies away Interior Fires from the gate Smoke in Cabin (Actual) Deplaning away from gate “Snakes on Planes” Disabled aircraft IROP conditions Dignitary aircraft Public Relations Events Emergency Non-Emergency Slide Deployment Controlled Deplaning A310 Alert III July 2000 Vienna B757 Engine Problem Dulles Sept. 2011 B737 Smoking APU at gate in Amsterdam, May 2010 Air Force One at Orlando International Airport Boeing 787 World Tour DFW May 12,2012 Jet Blue 504 stranded 7 hours at BDL, Oct.30, 2011 Aircraft Escape Slides Ground Ladders Aerial Ladders Air Stair Vehicles ARFF drill on a Boeing 727 using ground ladders Aerial Training IAD Easily Reaches Upper Deck of Wide Body Aircraft. B737 runway over-run at ORD MD10 FedEx Ramp DFW B767 at LAX B777 Bomb Threat DFW Accessair APS60FR/ Crash Rescue Hydro-Chem St. Louis-Lambert International Airport LAX 2002 Stinar F550 MCO Stinar F550 DIA 2008 Accessair PHX 2006 Accessair Service Air Stair Vehicle Range 8.3’ – 16.5’ Platform Width 5 ft. Safe operating speed 40-55 mph No Firefighting Capability Service Air Stair Vehicle Range 8 ft – 19 ft Platform Width 6 ft Safe operating speed 40-55 mph No Firefighting Capability Service Air Stair vehicle modified for Fire fighting Range 8’-19’ Platform Width 8 ft.
    [Show full text]