DOCSLIB.ORG

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT for the Study Entitled: SOCIOECONOMIC

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT For the study entitled: SOCIOECONOMIC BASELINE DATA COLLECTION, RESOURCE USE MAPPING, AND RAPID SOCIAL APPRAISAL In support of the: CENTRAL COAST MPA BASELINE DATA COLLECTION PROJECT Prepared for: CALIFORNIA SEA GRANT PROGRAM STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY (SCC), OCEAN PROTECTION COUNCIL (OPC), AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (CDFG) Prepared by: Impact Assessment, Inc. 2166 Avenida De La Playa, Suite F La Jolla, California 92037 January 2010 FINAL TECHNICAL REPORT For the study entitled: SOCIOECONOMIC BASELINE DATA COLLECTION, RESOURCE USE MAPPING, AND RAPID SOCIAL APPRAISAL Prepared for: CALIFORNIA SEA GRANT PROGRAM STATE COASTAL CONSERVANCY (SCC), OCEAN PROTECTION COUNCIL (OPC), AND CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME (CDFG) Prepared by: Impact Assessment, Inc. 2166 Avenida De La Playa, Suite F La Jolla, California 92037 John S. Petterson, Ph.D. Edward Glazier, Ph.D. Laura Stanley, Ph.D. Leila Madge, Ph.D. Russell Scalf, BS Julia Stevens, BA Courtney Carothers, Ph.D. Leila Sievanen, Ph.D. Ashwin Budden, Ph.D. (ABD) Terra Tolley, Ph.D. (ABD) Pam Godde, Ph.D. (ABD) Scientific Peer Review Panel Michael K. Orbach, Ph.D. Carrie Pomeroy, Ph.D. Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction..............................................................................................................................1 1.1 Administrative Background.................................................................................................2 1.2 Overview of MLPA Socioeconomic Research Goals and Objectives.................................5 1.3 Rationale and Methods ........................................................................................................5 1.4 The Setting and its Relationship to Our Approach ..............................................................7 1.5 Overview of the Study Region.............................................................................................9 1.6 Overview of Regulations Affecting Fishery Participants in the Study Region .................14 1.7 Organization of the Report.................................................................................................21 2.0 Socioeconomic and Demographic Overview of the Study Counties..................................23 2.1 San Mateo County..............................................................................................................25 Overview......................................................................................................................25 Population Trends ........................................................................................................25 Economic Trends .........................................................................................................27 Employment Trends.....................................................................................................27 2.2 Santa Cruz County .............................................................................................................29 Overview......................................................................................................................29 Population Trends ........................................................................................................29 Economic Trends .........................................................................................................31 Employment Trends.....................................................................................................32 2.3 Monterey County ...............................................................................................................34 Overview......................................................................................................................34 Population Trends ........................................................................................................34 Economic Trends .........................................................................................................36 Employment Trends.....................................................................................................37 2.4 San Luis Obispo County ....................................................................................................39 Overview......................................................................................................................39 Population Trends ........................................................................................................39 Economic Trends .........................................................................................................42 Employment Trends.....................................................................................................43 2.5 Santa Barbara County ........................................................................................................46 Overview......................................................................................................................46 Population Trends ........................................................................................................46 Economic Trends .........................................................................................................48 Employment Trends.....................................................................................................49 3.0 Port-Level Description of the Central California Commercial Fishing Industry............51 3.1 Central Coast Fishing Efforts and Supporting Infrastructure ............................................51 Overview......................................................................................................................51 Central California Fleet................................................................................................51 Resident and Non-Resident Commercial Fishing Vessels Combined.........................52 Small Commercial Vessels Registered to Residents ...................................................52 Central California Coast Study Region: Landings from 1981 to 2007........................54 Dealers/Processors and Commercial Vessels ..............................................................54 i 3.2 County by County Overview of Marine Fisheries.............................................................56 San Mateo County........................................................................................................56 Santa Cruz County .......................................................................................................61 Monterey County .........................................................................................................65 San Luis Obispo County ..............................................................................................78 Santa Barbara County ..................................................................................................84 4.0 Principal Marine Fisheries of Central California...............................................................87 4.1 Coastal Pelagic Species......................................................................................................88 Pacific Sardine .............................................................................................................91 Market Squid................................................................................................................94 Northern Anchovy .......................................................................................................97 4.2 Crustaceans ......................................................................................................................102 Dungeness Crab .........................................................................................................102 Pink Shrimp ...............................................................................................................105 Spot Prawn.................................................................................................................107 Pacific Ridgeback Prawn ...........................................................................................109 4.3 Groundfish .......................................................................................................................113 Rockfish .....................................................................................................................119 Roundfish...................................................................................................................130 Flatfish .......................................................................................................................135 4.4 Highly Migratory Species................................................................................................139 Albacore Tuna............................................................................................................139 Swordfish ...................................................................................................................145 4.5 Mollusks...........................................................................................................................146 Red Abalone...............................................................................................................146 4.6 Salmonids.........................................................................................................................149 Chinook
Recommended publications
  • A-3 Proposed Amendments to the League of California Cities Bylaws; (Administration)

    A-3 Proposed Amendments to the League of California Cities Bylaws; (Administration)

    City of Morro Bay City Council Agenda ________________________________________________________________________ Mission Statement The City of Morro Bay is dedicated to the preservation and enhancement of the quality of life. The City shall be committed to this purpose and will provide a level of municipal service and safety consistent with and responsive to the needs of the public. ________________________________________________________________________ REGULAR MEETING TUESDAY, APRIL 9, 2013 PUBLIC SESSION VETERANS MEMORIAL HALL - 6:00 P.M. 209 SURF ST., MORRO BAY, CA ESTABLISH QUORUM AND CALL TO ORDER MOMENT OF SILENCE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE CLOSED SESSION REPORT MAYOR & COUNCILMEMBERS’ REPORTS, ANNOUNCEMENTS & PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC COMMENT - Members of the audience wishing to address the Council on City business matters not on the agenda may do so at this time. To increase the effectiveness of the Public Comment Period, the following rules shall be followed: When recognized by the Mayor, please come forward to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Comments are to be limited to three minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to Council, as a whole, and not to any individual member thereof. The Council respectfully requests that you refrain from making slanderous, profane or personal remarks against any elected official, commission and/or staff. Please refrain from public displays or outbursts such as unsolicited applause, comments or cheering. Any disruptive activities that substantially interfere with the ability of the City Council to carry out its meeting will not be permitted and offenders will be requested to leave the meeting. Your participation in City Council meetings is welcome and your courtesy will be appreciated.
  • S Best Beaches South of San Francisco

    S Best Beaches South of San Francisco

    California’s Best Beaches South of San Francisco Author’s Note: This article “California’s Best Beaches South of San Francisco” is one of 30 chapters in my book/ebook Northern California Travel: The Best Options. That book is available in English as a book/ebook and also as an ebook in Chinese. Several of my books on California can be seen on myAmazon Author Page. See also my companion article “California’s Best Beaches North of San Francisco.” By Lee Foster If headed south from San Francisco on CA Highway 1, which are the loveliest beaches at which to linger? Here are my suggestions: Montara Beach, 10 miles south Montara Beach offers a classic beach experience and is my favorite in this region. You park on a bluff overlooking the south end of the beach. Stretching in front of you are a couple miles of sand, going north. The lookout is inviting. The beach is wide and welcoming. The surf is crashing. In the hours before sunset a golden glow from the west settles on the beach and cliffs behind it. Gingerly descend the stairs to the beach. The stairs get wiped out from time to time by storms. But then they get rebuilt. Walk north along the beach. Admire the thunderous surf. Gulp in the fresh air. Accept the glow of the sun from the west. Indulge in a near-wilderness experience, yet very close to San Francisco. A very few other people will be frolicking on the beach, perhaps with their dogs fetching sticks in the surf.
  • Biological Report

    Biological Report

    Biological Report 3093 Beachcomber Drive APN: 065-120-001 Morro Bay, CA Owner: Paul LaPlante Permit #29586 Prepared by V. L. Holland, Ph.D. Plant and Restoration Ecology 1697 El Cerrito Ct. San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Prepared for: John K Construction, Inc. 110 Day Street Nipomo, CA 93444 [email protected] and Paul LaPlante 1935 Beachcomber Drive Morro Bay, CA 93442 March 5, 2013 BIOLOGICAL SURVEY OF 3093 BEACHCOMBER DRIVE, MORRO BAY, CA 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ...................................................................... 4 LOCATION AND PHYSICAL FEATURES ........................................................ 10 FLORISTIC, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE INVENTORY ............................. 11 METHODS ......................................................................................................... 11 RESULTS: FLORA AND VEGETATION ON SITE .......................................... 12 FLORA .............................................................................................................. 12 VEGETATION ..................................................................................................... 13 1. ANTHROPOGENIC (RUDERAL) COMMUNITIES ................................................... 13 2. COASTAL DUNE SCRUB ................................................................................. 15 SPECIAL STATUS PLANT SPECIES ..............................................................
  • Doggin' America's Beaches

    Doggin' America's Beaches

    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
  • Map Showing Seacliff Response to Climatic And

    Map Showing Seacliff Response to Climatic And

    MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES MF-2399 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY C A 123 122 30' 122 LI 38 FO Table 1. Linear extent of cliff section experiencing slope failure for each of the time periods investigated. The data is further subdivided to Concord Map RN show the type of slope failure for each occurrence, as well as the geologic units involved, if distinguishable. Area INTRODUCTION I A The coastal cliffs along much of the central California coast are actively retreating. Large storms and periodic GULF OF THE earthquakes are responsible for most of the documented seacliff slope failures. Long-term average erosion rates calculated for FARALLONES Debris Debris this section of coast (Moore and others, 1999) do not provide the spatial or temporal data resolution necessary to identify the Time Interval BlBlock k OthOther TtTotalll along-cliffliff NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARY Oakland processes responsible for retreat of the seacliffs, where episodic retreat threatens homes and community infrastructure. falls flows Slumps (m) Slaking (m) San fll(falls (m) ) ()(m) filfailure per itinterval l Francisco Research suggests that more erosion occurs along the California coast over a short time scale, during periods of severe storms (m) (m) Farallon or seismic activity, than occurs during decades of normal weather or seismic quiescence (Griggs and Scholar, 1998; Griggs, Islands 1994; Plant and Griggs, 1990; Griggs and Johnson, 1979 and 1983; Kuhn and Shepard, 1979). Livermore This is the second map in a series of maps documenting the processes of short-term seacliff retreat through the 0 130130.5 5 113113.4 4 identification of slope failure styles, spatial variability of failures, and temporal variation in retreat amounts in an area that has --------- 0 0 ------------- 0 0 243.9 Pacifica (i(instantaneous) t t ) been identified as an erosion hotspot (Moore and others, 1999; Griggs and Savoy, 1985).
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area

    Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area

    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
  • Pitch Canker Kills Pines, Spreads to New Species and Regions

    Pitch Canker Kills Pines, Spreads to New Species and Regions

    Pitch canker kills pines, Page 1 of 8 Return to Previous Page Pitch canker kills pines, spreads to new species and regions Andrew J. Storer o Thomas R. Gordon o Paul L. Dallara o David L. Wood California Agriculture, Vol. 48, No. 6, pages 9-13 The host and geographic range of the pitch canker pathogen has greatly increased since it was first discovered in California in 1986. Most significantly, it now affects many pine species, including native stands of Monterey pine, and has made a transgeneric jump to Douglas fir. Isolated occurrences of the disease have been found as far north as Mendocino County. Insects are strongly implicated as vectors of the pathogen, and long term management appears to be dependent on the development of resistant tree varieties. In infested regions, the planting of Monterey pine and other pine tree species should be undertaken with caution. Pitch canker disease was first identified in California at New Brighton State Beach, Santa Cruz County, in 1986. By the beginning of 1992, it was recorded as far north as San Francisco and as far south as San Diego County. Most records were from Monterey pine, but occasional infections of bishop, Coulter, Italian stone, Aleppo, ponderosa and Canary Island pine were reported. The most extensive infestations were in Santa Cruz and southern Alameda counties. In Southern California, with the exception of an isolated infestation in Santa Barbara County, only Monterey pine Christmas tree plantations were affected. Pitch canker disease, caused by the fungus Fusarium subglutinans f. sp. pini, is characterized by a resinous exudation on the surface of Trees with advanced pich canker symptoms have significant crown shoots, branches, exposed roots and boles of dieback due to the large number of infested trees.
  • RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV Sites in the United States Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile

    RV sites in the United States This GPS POI file is available here: https://poidirectory.com/poifiles/united_states/accommodation/RV_MH-US.html Location Map 110-Mile Park Map 35 Mile Camp Map 370 Lakeside Park Map 5 Star RV Map 566 Piney Creek Horse Camp Map 7 Oaks RV Park Map 8th and Bridge RV Map A AAA RV Map A and A Mesa Verde RV Map A H Hogue Map A H Stephens Historic Park Map A J Jolly County Park Map A Mountain Top RV Map A-Bar-A RV/CG Map A. W. Jack Morgan County Par Map A.W. Marion State Park Map Abbeville RV Park Map Abbott Map Abbott Creek (Abbott Butte) Map Abilene State Park Map Abita Springs RV Resort (Oce Map Abram Rutt City Park Map Acadia National Parks Map Acadiana Park Map Ace RV Park Map Ackerman Map Ackley Creek Co Park Map Ackley Lake State Park Map Acorn East Map Acorn Valley Map Acorn West Map Ada Lake Map Adam County Fairgrounds Map Adams City CG Map Adams County Regional Park Map Adams Fork Map Page 1 Location Map Adams Grove Map Adelaide Map Adirondack Gateway Campgroun Map Admiralty RV and Resort Map Adolph Thomae Jr. County Par Map Adrian City CG Map Aerie Crag Map Aeroplane Mesa Map Afton Canyon Map Afton Landing Map Agate Beach Map Agnew Meadows Map Agricenter RV Park Map Agua Caliente County Park Map Agua Piedra Map Aguirre Spring Map Ahart Map Ahtanum State Forest Map Aiken State Park Map Aikens Creek West Map Ainsworth State Park Map Airplane Flat Map Airport Flat Map Airport Lake Park Map Airport Park Map Aitkin Co Campground Map Ajax Country Livin' I-49 RV Map Ajo Arena Map Ajo Community Golf Course Map
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Abella, S. R. 2010. Disturbance and plant succession in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the American Southwest. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 7:1248—1284. Abella, S. R., D. J. Craig, L. P. Chiquoine, K. A. Prengaman, S. M. Schmid, and T. M. Embrey. 2011. Relationships of native desert plants with red brome (Bromus rubens): Toward identifying invasion-reducing species. Invasive Plant Science and Management 4:115—124. Abella, S. R., N. A. Fisichelli, S. M. Schmid, T. M. Embrey, D. L. Hughson, and J. Cipra. 2015. Status and management of non-native plant invasion in three of the largest national parks in the United States. Nature Conservation 10:71—94. Available: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.10.4407 Abella, S. R., A. A. Suazo, C. M. Norman, and A. C. Newton. 2013. Treatment alternatives and timing affect seeds of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii), an invasive forb in American Southwest arid lands. Invasive Plant Science and Management 6:559—567. Available: https://doi.org/10.1614/IPSM-D-13-00022.1 Abrahamson, I. 2014. Arctostaphylos manzanita. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Fire Effects Information System (Online). plants/shrub/arcman/all.html Ackerman, T. L. 1979. Germination and survival of perennial plant species in the Mojave Desert. The Southwestern Naturalist 24:399—408. Adams, A. W. 1975. A brief history of juniper and shrub populations in southern Oregon. Report No. 6. Oregon State Wildlife Commission, Corvallis, OR. Adams, L. 1962. Planting depths for seeds of three species of Ceanothus.
  • ISA RULEBOOK & CONTEST ADMINISTRATION MANUAL 1 December 2018

    ISA RULEBOOK & CONTEST ADMINISTRATION MANUAL 1 December 2018

    ISA RULEBOOK & CONTEST ADMINISTRATION MANUAL 1 December 2018 ISA Rule Book –1 Decembert 2018 1 CHAPTER 1: ISA Introduction and Operations .......................................................................................................................... 4 I. About the ISA ................................................................................................................................................................. 4 II. ISA Membership Categories ........................................................................................................................................... 4 III. ISA Participating vs. Non-Participating Members ........................................................................................................... 4 IV. ISA Membership Sub Categories ................................................................................................................................... 5 V. ISA Recognized Continental Associations ...................................................................................................................... 5 VI. ISA Recognized Organizations ....................................................................................................................................... 5 VII. Application for ISA Membership ..................................................................................................................................... 5 VIII. ISA Member Nations (100) ............................................................................................................................................
  • 2011 Progress Report Full Version 02 12.Indd

    2011 Progress Report Full Version 02 12.Indd

    CALIFORNIA RECREATIONAL TRAILS PLAN Providing Vision and Direction for California Trails Tahoe Rim Trail Tahoe Rim Trail TahoeTTahhoe RRiRimm TrailTTrail Complete Progress Report 2011 California State Parks Planning Division Statewide Trails Section www.parks.ca.gov/trails/trailsplan Message from the Director Th e ability to exercise and enjoy nature in the outdoors is critical to the physical and mental health of California’s population. Trails and greenways provide the facilities for these activities. Our surveys of Californian’s recreational use patterns over the years have shown that our variety of trails, from narrow back-country trails to spacious paved multi-use facilities, provide experiences that attract more users than any other recreational facility in California. Th e increasing population and desire for trails are increasing pressures on the agencies charged with their planning, maintenance and management. As leaders in the planning and management of all types of trail systems, California State Parks is committed to assisting the state’s recreation providers by complying with its legislative mandate of recording the progress of the California Recreational Trails Plan. During the preparation of this progress report, input was received through surveys, two California Recreational Trails Committee public meetings and a session at the 2011 California Trails and Greenways Conference. Preparation of this progress Above: Director Ruth Coleman report included extensive research into the current status of the 27 California Trail Corridors, determining which of these corridors need administrative, funding or planning assistance. Research and public input regarding the Plan’s twelve Goals and their associated Action Guidelines have identifi ed both encouraging progress and areas where more attention is needed.
  • Link to SRSB Dune Restoration and Management Plan

    Link to SRSB Dune Restoration and Management Plan

    The Greater Salinas River State Beach Dune Restoration and Management Plan Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs and Coastal Conservation and Research in partnership with California Department of Parks and Recreation Revised June 2020 This page intentionally left blank CONTENTS Existing Conditions and Background ....................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................. 1 Site Description ............................................................................................................ 1 Plants and Animals at the Dunes ........................................................................................ 5 Dunes and Iceplant ....................................................................................................... 10 Previous Restoration Efforts in Monterey Bay ...................................................................... 12 Dunes as Coastal Protection from Storms ........................................................................... 14 Restoration Plan ............................................................................................................. 16 Summary................................................................................................................... 16 Restoration Goals and Objectives ..................................................................................... 18 Goal 1. Eradicate