Geology of the Plattsburgh and Rouses New York-Vermont, Quadrangles

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Geology of the Plattsburgh and Rouses New York-Vermont, Quadrangles Geology of the Plattsburgh and Rouses New York-Vermont, Quadrangles DONALD W. FISHER The gastropod, Maclurites magnus Le Sueur (xl) from the Chazyan Crown Point Limestone. Moc/ur/tes SPECIAL BULLETIN NO. 1, 1968 VERMONT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY, BURLINGTON CHARLES G. DOLL, STATE GEOLOGIST Vermont Water Resources Department, Monipelier Figure 1 WORLD PHANEROZOIC TIME SCALE Era Perod Epoch Description MILLIONS OF YEARS PLEISTOCENE 1/p-2r,Mon O P I GENE 7 ------ Large carnivores bundant grazing mammals. NI 0 TERTIARY arge running mammals. any modern types of mammals. UPALEOCENE arliest placental mammals UPPER Earliest flowering plants. 0 CRETACEOUS 10 Climax of dinosaurs and ammonites-followed by extinction. Great decline of brachiopods. Great development of bony fishes. LOWER 0 NI 13 Z 0 UPPER 16 Earliest birds and mammals, JURASSIC MIDDLE 0 17 Abundant dinosaurs and ammonites LOWER 190-9 UPPER 20 TRIASS/C MIDDLE Earliest dinosaurs, Abundant cycads and conifers. 21 UPPER Extinction of many kinds marine animals 1 including trilobites. PERM/AN LOWER Little change in terrestrial animals. (II) 28C 0 PENNSYLVANIAN Earliest reptiles. Great coal-forming forests. N CARBONIFEROIIS *31C Abundant sharks and amphibians. 0 MISSISSIPPIAN Large and numerous scale trees and seed ferns. MIDDLE DEVON/AN Earliest amphibians and ommonites. Extinction LOWER of armored fishes, other fishes abundant. Earliest terrestrial plants and animals. SILURIAN Peak development of eurypterids. LU. UPPER --- - -- Earliest fishes. Invertebrates dominant -coelenterates • ORDO V/C/A N and mollusks become abundant, echinoderms expand • --- U LOWER II in numbers and kinds. 'Sn UPPER 515 u_ MIDDLE CAMBRIAN Earliest abundant record of marine life 540 Trilobites dominant. -'--.- LOW ER z cr 'S7C PRECAMBRIAN EON Fossils extremely rare, primitive aquatic plants. OR/GIN OF THE EARTH4500 '- DATES (except C) FROM: Quop/erly Joe,, Geol Soc. Lo,,don, v.120, p. 260- 262 (1964) Geology of the Plattsburgh and Rouses New York-Vermont, Quadrangles DONALD W. FISHER SPECIAL BULLETIN NO. 1, 1968 VERMONT GEOLOGiCAL SURVEY, BIJRLINGTON CHARLES G. DOLL, STATE GEOLOGIST Vermont Water Resources Department, Montpeiier M731-Ag67 . 3000 ( 53 083) CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT . 1 INTROI)UCTION ....................................................3 History and Geologic Setting ....................................... Acknov!edgnients ................................................5 Geog mph and 'Jopog rapliv ........................................3 Geochronologv ...................................................8 PRECAMBRIAN ROCKS .............................................11 CAMBRIAN-ORI)OVICIAN ROCKS ....................................15 Saratoga Springs Group ..........................................15 Beekrnanto on Group ..............................................19 ChazyGroup ....................................................2 Black River Group ...............................................26 Trenton Group ...................................................27 Lacohle Melange .................................................30 LATE JURASSIC-EARLY CRLTACEOUS IGNEOUS ROCKS ............... .33 PLEISTOCENE DEPOSITS ...........................................35 GEOLOGIC AND TECTONIC 1-IISTORY ................................. ECONOMIC GEOLOGY ...............................................43 BIBLIOGRAPHY.....................................................48 in ILLUSTRATIONS FIcIJRI,: PAGE The gaStropod, 4Iaclurztes mugnus Le Sueur (xl) from tile Chazyan Cro ii Point Limestone. ........................................... front cover L World Phanerozoic Time Scale........................inside front cover 2. Eurystoniies ke/loggi Whitfield ) . a coiled nautiloid from the Fort Cassin Formation at Chellis Ba . Iouses Point quadrangle ................... vii 3. Index map, sho ing mapped area ith respect to adj acent mapped and tin- mappedareas . ................................................... 4 1. Generalized geologic and tectonic map of the Champlain Valley........... 6 5. Vista. looking north. from Trembleau Mountain Precambrian across Pale- ozoic lois land; Port Kent in (enter ( on Potsdam Sandstone ) ............. 7 6. Panorama. from the iop of land Hill. looking south-southeast. Precambrian lrembleau Mountain on center horizon, metamorphosed Cambrian and Or. dovician Green Mountains in left haze, and Precambrian high peaks of Adirondacks on right horizon. Lake Champlain Valley floored by 6 ireland rocks of Cambrian and Ordovician ages. ............................ 8-9 7. Vertical narrow diabase (likes, cutting metagabbro which had earlier cut metanorthosite. On west side of Northway ( Interstate 87). one mile south of Keesevjlle. .................................................... 11 8. Narrow diabase (like cutting metanorthosite along Delaware and Hudson Railroad. near Trembleau Point . .................................... 12 9. Metanorthosite inclusions o hite slivers) in (liabase (like is hich has pene- trated the metanorthosite, along road to Trembleau Point . .............. 13 10. Summary of development of nomenclature of foreland rocks in the Cham. plainValley ..................................................... 14 11. Closeup of Ausahie Arkose Member of I'otsdam Formation at Lapharns Mills; note crosslaminations . ...................................... 16 2. Current ripple marks (arrow denotes current direction) in Keeseville Sand. stone Member of Potsdam formation above falls at Ausable Chasm....... 16 13. Keeseville Sandstone Member of Potsdam Formation in Ausable Chasm; note the regular bedding.. ........................................ 17 14. Lecanospira compacta (Salter) . a depressed-spire gastropod and indicator of a medial Canadian age, Spellmaii Limestone. Kirby Ledge, Beekman. town , New York.................................................. 19 15. Closeup of reticulated surface produced by differential iseathering of (1010. mitic limestone; Fort Cassin Formation south of Chellis Bay ............. 20 16. Fort Cassin limestone and (lolostone of the Beekmantown Group, along lake shore south of Chellis Bay......................................... 20 17. Providence Island Dolostorie, along east side of U.S. 9, 4 miles north of Plattsburgh ...................................................... 21 18. Crossbedded coarse grained limestones (calcarenites ) of Day Point Forma- tion, in pasture one mile south of Sheldon Lane...................... 23 9. Reef topography in uppermost I)ay Point Limestone, atop abandone(l quarry north of Boyntomi Avenue, Plattsburgh............................... 23 V FILMIHID PAGE 20. \1 1e illu., lioling, the abundance If the ga , tropod 1100/UI (Ill nogiiiis Le Snout- in the Cn Ill II P1 11111 1 ,ii11(tI(l1e. North II a (lit 2.5 1111105 SI liltillI est of(:h ....................................................... 24 21. Cr01111 Point I,ii11Itoile at southerii end of Vih'oijr Islatol : (liii marks trace of an (Ist-oest I rending normal fault of the latit 101111111 fault \ 51(n) ....... 21 22. Reef i'o'k Hiaiti 1)005) alIli lilIiIkilIU ('lll('aI('IIit(S (ilIrkIr areas iii basal Valcotir I,iiIll'StoII( at ahandolled quarrN , on lec1lard fariti. west of kings Bay 25 2%. Spotres and itIglil itodulis iii reellet in basal Valcour I,iiitestoite ill type lo- caht\ . 1.3 lilies soutiloet of Chazv . ................................ 25 21. Straigitl-sit('lI('Ii itlltllllOi(i (1(1)05 1ll(tlttillg reef rock at Berliard quarry reef coniple......................................................... 25 25. Valcour.Pantelia-i,Io I illeisle La Motto transition in south fate of akin. (ioile(l hiiternat ((11111 futite and Stone ivarr . lIne utile sotithleast of Cliazy 26 26. The trilolot' (:rI/iloIi//oI.', ie,ssel otus Gree n . an indicator of fttrileveld aie and ('oiltitloiI ii the Mont real Limestone Meitiher (f the F01l5 Lime- 510111 1111(1 ii till Ctituiheriaioi 1100(1 Argihte ......................... 27 27. Uedding ( liqIpilig to leftl 1111(1 ('Leavage (hj(pilg SteeplE to tile right in Cumherlarii 1 lea)1 A rliill ite. along U.S. Q. I lilies ilortil of Platlshurgli 28 28. Correlation Ultart. (atithriaiu.Ordovit'ian of the Adirotudaok 1ordei' region 30 29. I,acolle MI"lar(ge. along south side of N.Y. 9A east of Cooporville. Note angultriI\ 1111(1 (lisparit\ in SIZe of varied rock fragiiteitts............... :31 30. i"ault i( nit ia 010111.1 'Irltl'\ llrook fault. Ill west side of U.S. 9. north of rail. road niolerlutss iii i illage of Chazy . The rock is eniiel orushued Potsdani I Keese' ut SlulldStIIlIe ........................................... 32 31. l,an1lool(hI, re (luke. fta mules north (If Valcour. t-uttmg i)ay Point Lilnestolle and trlIidmg toll 01(1 atiotiter (hke shown In arloll I 11001 sollthleril tip of \Talcotur 1511111(1 ................................................... 33 32. Glacial striatlluts. treitdjii nOl'til-Sotltil. (01 1,ari'ahee Mruiiio'r of the Glens F ails I ,jniesiouie : alop 11)11th lILt!1 of ahaildolleli I Ilteritlit i nal I ,ime and Stone ContJIaui% (1uarry . one mile southeast of Chaz. .................... 35 ii. Map shuoll iulg ('\teltt of I ,ake Vermont ................................ 36 3!. M111( skm ilg (XIelII of ChaluujIhain Sea .............................. .37 35. Crossiedded. laitlitIlIled Pleistocene sands of tlic [hamplaiit Sea in sand pit south of N.'I. 373. one niile east of Ausable Chasm. .................... 36. Ingrailltin I'sker: l(rftle illustratiuc sand aiii eravel, and laini,uated sands ieldiig
Recommended publications
  • The Evolution of a Heterogeneous Martian Mantle: Clues from K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni Variations in Gusev Basalts and Shergottite Meteorites
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 296 (2010) 67–77 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth and Planetary Science Letters journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The evolution of a heterogeneous Martian mantle: Clues from K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni variations in Gusev basalts and shergottite meteorites Mariek E. Schmidt a,⁎, Timothy J. McCoy b a Dept. of Earth Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, ON, Canada L2S 3A1 b Dept. of Mineral Sciences, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560-0119, USA article info abstract Article history: Martian basalts represent samples of the interior of the planet, and their composition reflects their source at Received 10 December 2009 the time of extraction as well as later igneous processes that affected them. To better understand the Received in revised form 16 April 2010 composition and evolution of Mars, we compare whole rock compositions of basaltic shergottitic meteorites Accepted 21 April 2010 and basaltic lavas examined by the Spirit Mars Exploration Rover in Gusev Crater. Concentrations range from Available online 2 June 2010 K-poor (as low as 0.02 wt.% K2O) in the shergottites to K-rich (up to 1.2 wt.% K2O) in basalts from the Editor: R.W. Carlson Columbia Hills (CH) of Gusev Crater; the Adirondack basalts from the Gusev Plains have more intermediate concentrations of K2O (0.16 wt.% to below detection limit). The compositional dataset for the Gusev basalts is Keywords: more limited than for the shergottites, but it includes the minor elements K, P, Ti, Cr, and Ni, whose behavior Mars igneous processes during mantle melting varies from very incompatible (prefers melt) to very compatible (remains in the shergottites residuum).
    [Show full text]
  • State Ge?Logical Survey
    ILLINOIS State Ge?logical Survey BULLETIN NO. 1. THE GEOLOGICAL MAP OF ILLINOIS BY STUART WELLER. URBANA: UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS. 1906. SPRINGFIELD: lLLI:\'OIS STATE JOURNAL Co., STATE PRINTBRs· 1 9 0 6 ., STATE GEOLOGICAL COMMISSION GOVERNOR C. S. DENEEN, Chairman, PROFESSOR T. C. CHAMBERLIN, V·ice-Oha·irman. PRESIDENT EDMUND J. JAMES Secretary. H. FOSTER BAIN, Director. ·1 CONTENTS. PAGE. Letter of transmittal.... .. .. .. ..... ..... ...... .. ... ......... .. .. .... Introduction .................................................................... ..... 8 Purpose of a geological map.............................. ............................... 8 Sources of material . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ........ .... 8 Lines of deformation .............................. ........................ 11 Geological formations represented ................................ rn Cambrian........................ ........ ..... .. 13 Potsdam sandstone .. ...... ...................... 1:J Ordovician ............................................... ........................... ...... 14 Lower Magnesian limestone.......................... ... ........ 14 St. Peters sandstone . ... .... .... .. .. ..... ..... ...... .. ... ... H Trenton-Galena formation ............................................ ............... 1r:i Cincinnatian formation.... .. ...... .. .. .. .. ...... .. .... 16 Silurian ......... ...... .... .. .... ....... .... ............ ........ .... .. ...... .... .. .... ...... 17 N iag-aran limestone.... .. .. .. .. .. ... ........ ... 17 Devonian..............................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Multiple Trackways of Protichnites Owen, 1852, from the Potsdam Sandstone (Late Cambrian), St
    AN ANALYSIS OF MULTIPLE TRACKWAYS OF PROTICHNITES OWEN, 1852, FROM THE POTSDAM SANDSTONE (LATE CAMBRIAN), ST. LAWRENCE VALLEY, NY by Matthew E. Burton-Kelly A Bachelors Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Geology of St. Lawrence University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honors in Geology Canton, New York 2005 1 2 3 This thesis submitted by in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science with Honors in Geology from St. Lawrence University is hereby approved by the Faculty Advisor under whom the work was done. Faculty Advisor Date Department Chairman Date ii 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The author would like to thank Dr. J. Mark Erickson for his assistance and guidance throughout the course of this project, as well as the St. Lawrence University Geology Department, which provided research materials and covered transportation costs. Attendance at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Section of the Geological Society of America to present preliminary results was funded by the Jim Street Fund, St. Lawrence University Geology. Jim Dawson provided vital insight into the nature of these trackways. Any number of additional people provided support for the author, most notably Camille Partin, Trisha Smrecak, and Joanne Cavallerano, but thanks go out to all the members of the St. Lawrence University Geology Department and the St. Lawrence University Track and Field teams. iii 5 TABLE OF CONTENTS THESIS APPROVAL..........................................................................................................ii
    [Show full text]
  • Chemin X-Ray Diffraction of the Windjana Sample
    PUBLICATIONS Journal of Geophysical Research: Planets RESEARCH ARTICLE Mineralogy, provenance, and diagenesis of a potassic 10.1002/2015JE004932 basaltic sandstone on Mars: CheMin X-ray diffraction Special Section: of the Windjana sample (Kimberley area, Gale Crater) The Mars Science Laboratory Rover Mission (Curiosity) at The Allan H. Treiman1, David L. Bish2, David T. Vaniman3, Steve J. Chipera4, David F. Blake5, Kimberley, Gale Crater, Mars Doug W. Ming6, Richard V. Morris6, Thomas F. Bristow5, Shaunna M. Morrison7, Michael B. Baker8, Elizabeth B. Rampe6, Robert T. Downs7, Justin Filiberto9, Allen F. Glazner10, Ralf Gellert11, Key Points: Lucy M. Thompson12, Mariek E. Schmidt13, Laetitia Le Deit14, Roger C. Wiens15, Amy C. McAdam16, • First mineralogical analysis of Cherie N. Achilles2, Kenneth S. Edgett17, Jack D. Farmer18, Kim V. Fendrich7, John P. Grotzinger8, sandstone on Mars 19 20 8 21 12 • Windjana sandstone very rich in Sanjeev Gupta , John Michael Morookian , Megan E. Newcombe , Melissa S. Rice , John G. Spray , sanidine, implying a trachyte source Edward M. Stolper8, Dawn Y. Sumner22, Ashwin R. Vasavada20, and Albert S. Yen20 rock • The source of Gale Crater sediments is 1Lunar and Planetary Institute, Houston, Texas, USA, 2Department of Geological Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, an incredibly diverse igneous terrane USA, 3Planetary Science Institute,Tucson,Arizona,USA,4Chesapeake Energy Corporation, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA, 5NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, USA, 6Astromaterials
    [Show full text]
  • Volcanism on Mars
    Author's personal copy Chapter 41 Volcanism on Mars James R. Zimbelman Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA William Brent Garry and Jacob Elvin Bleacher Sciences and Exploration Directorate, Code 600, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA David A. Crown Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, AZ, USA Chapter Outline 1. Introduction 717 7. Volcanic Plains 724 2. Background 718 8. Medusae Fossae Formation 725 3. Large Central Volcanoes 720 9. Compositional Constraints 726 4. Paterae and Tholi 721 10. Volcanic History of Mars 727 5. Hellas Highland Volcanoes 722 11. Future Studies 728 6. Small Constructs 723 Further Reading 728 GLOSSARY shield volcano A broad volcanic construct consisting of a multitude of individual lava flows. Flank slopes are typically w5, or less AMAZONIAN The youngest geologic time period on Mars identi- than half as steep as the flanks on a typical composite volcano. fied through geologic mapping of superposition relations and the SNC meteorites A group of igneous meteorites that originated on areal density of impact craters. Mars, as indicated by a relatively young age for most of these caldera An irregular collapse feature formed over the evacuated meteorites, but most importantly because gases trapped within magma chamber within a volcano, which includes the potential glassy parts of the meteorite are identical to the atmosphere of for a significant role for explosive volcanism. Mars. The abbreviation is derived from the names of the three central volcano Edifice created by the emplacement of volcanic meteorites that define major subdivisions identified within the materials from a centralized source vent rather than from along a group: S, Shergotty; N, Nakhla; C, Chassigny.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Properties of St. Peter Sandstone a Comparison of Field and Laboratory Results a Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of T
    MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF ST. PETER SANDSTONE A COMPARISON OF FIELD AND LABORATORY RESULTS A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY MICHAEL EUGENE DITTES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE DECEMBER, 2015 This thesis contains previously published material (Appendix E) in the “Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering” © 2002 ASCE. All other material © 2015 Michael E. Dittes All Rights Reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to extend my thanks to those, who without their help I would not have been able to bring this project to completion. First and foremost, I thank Professor Joseph Labuz who took a chance on me, by offering me a TA-ship. Through my time in school, Joe helped me stay focused when I started to move off on tangents, offered timely advice, and over the years has become much more than my advisor. I am proud to think of him as a friend. Professors Andrew Drescher and Peter Huddleston also deserve special thanks for providing critical review of my work, and agreeing to sit on my thesis committee. To Ms. Tiffany Ralston who had an uncanny way of knowing what I needed to do, and how, before I knew myself. To Charles Nelson who helped me streamline my thesis project and helped me gain access to the Minnesota Library Archives construction site. To my fellow graduate students with whom I debated, joked and laughed, you helped me see things that I was missing. Your input was invaluable and you have my deep appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • AST-2018-1847-Ver9-Hughes 4P 260..283
    ASTROBIOLOGY Volume 19, Number 3, 2019 Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. DOI: 10.1089/ast.2018.1847 Basaltic Terrains in Idaho and Hawai‘i as Planetary Analogs for Mars Geology and Astrobiology Scott S. Hughes,1 Christopher W. Haberle,2 Shannon E. Kobs Nawotniak,1 Alexander Sehlke,3 W. Brent Garry,4 Richard C. Elphic,3 Samuel J. Payler,5 Adam H. Stevens,5 Charles S. Cockell,5 Allyson L. Brady,6 Jennifer L. Heldmann,3,7 and Darlene S.S. Lim3,8 Abstract Field research target regions within two basaltic geologic provinces are described as Earth analogs to Mars. Regions within the eastern Snake River Plain of Idaho and the Big Island of Hawai‘i, the United States, provinces that represent analogs of present-day and early Mars, respectively, were evaluated on the basis of geologic settings, rock lithology and geochemistry, rock alteration, and climate. Each of these factors provides rationale for the selection of specific targets for field research in five analog target regions: (1) Big Craters and (2) Highway lava flows at Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve, Idaho, and (3) Mauna Ulu low shield, (4) Kılauea Iki lava lake, and (5) Kılauea caldera in the Kılauea Volcano summit region and the East Rift Zone of Hawai‘i. Our evaluation of compositional and textural attributes, as well as the effects of syn- and posteruptive rock alteration, shows that basaltic terrains in Idaho and Hawai‘i provide a way to characterize the geology and major geologic substrates that host biological activity of relevance to Mars exploration. This work provides the foundation to better understand the scientific questions related to the habitability of basaltic terrains, the rationale behind selecting analog field targets, and their applicability as analogs to Mars.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 5 Town of Barton Geology and Seismicity Report Sections
    GEOLOGY AND SEISMICITY REPORT SNYDER E1-A WELL TOWN OF BARTON TIOGA COUNTY, NEW YORK Prepared for: Couch White, LLP 540 Broadway P.O. Box 22222 Albany, New York 12201 Prepared by: Continental Placer Inc. II Winners Circle Albany, New York 12205 July 25, 2017 Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Depositional Sequences and General Stratigraphic Sequence ................................................ 2 2.1.1 Upper Devonian Lithologies ........................................................................................................ 4 2.1.2 Marcellus-Hamilton ..................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.3 Tristates-Onondaga ...................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.4 Helderberg .................................................................................................................................... 4 2.1.5 Oneida-Clinton-Salina ................................................................................................................. 4 2.1.6 Black River-Trenton-Utica-Frankfort .......................................................................................... 5 2.1.7 Potsdam-Beekmantown ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Properties, Origins, and Preservation of Ancient Olivine-Bearing Bedrock: Implications for Noachian Processes on Mars, A
    Fourth Conference on Early Mars 2017 (LPI Contrib. No. 2014) 3033.pdf PROPERTIES, ORIGINS, AND PRESERVATION OF ANCIENT OLIVINE-BEARING BEDROCK: IMPLICATIONS FOR NOACHIAN PROCESSES ON MARS, A. D. Rogers1, J. C. Cowart1, J. W. Head2, N. H. Warner3, A. Palumbo2, and M. P. Golombek4, 1Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA ([email protected]), 2Brown University, Providence, RI, USA, 3SUNY Geneseo, Geneseo, NY USA, 4Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA Introduction and significance: Many intercrater cratered terrains [10]. Even where Hesperian volcanic plains and degraded impact craters in the Noachian high- plains are in direct contact with older bedrock, a striking lands contain flat-lying, relatively high thermal inertia difference in TI and regolith cover is observed, such that (TI) surfaces (“bedrock”) that commonly show modest Hesperian plains are more mantled than the older subja- enrichments in olivine and/or pyroxene compared to sur- cent bedrock units [10] (Fig. 2). A candidate explanation rounding materials (Fig. 1). These surfaces have maxi- for this is that the Noachian bedrock was rapidly buried mum TI values above 500 J m-2 K-1 s-1/2 in THEMIS im- and then recently exposed [10], however an alternative ages; some units exhibit TI values well above 900 J m-2 explanation is that the Noachian bedrock units are me- K-1 s-1/2. These physicochemically distinctive units occur chanically weak/fine-grained materials that break up into in dozens of isolated exposures ranging from ~2x102 to fine-grained materials [e.g. 11,12] that are more easily ~3x104 km2 in area and exhibit morphologies indicating moved by wind.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 093 640 SE 017 316 AUTHOR Rickard, Lawrence V. TITLE Stratigraphy and Structure of the Subsurface Cambrian and Ordovician Carbonates of New York. INSTITUTION New York State Education Dept., Albany. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 30p. EDRS PRICE EF-$0.75 HC-$1.85 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; Earth Science; *Geology; Instruction; *Instructional Materials; *Maps; *Paleontology; Science Education IDENTIFIERS New York State Museum and Science Service ABSTRACT This publication presents a description pf 137 wells in New York State and adjacent parts of Pennsylvania. Correlations with surface exposures are established. Maps and cross sections display the thickness, structure, and stratigraphic relationships of the carbonates described. ,A paleogeologic map of New York State at the end of the Early Ordovician is presented. Two distinct series of rocks which comprise the Cambrian and Ordovician carbonates of New York'are described and studied in detail. The monograpil includes an extensive bibliography, several schematic figures and diagrams, and two appendices which give data relevant to the identification of control wells and subsurface data from control wells. (Author/EB) U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION B WELFARE NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO OUCEO EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FRO': THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGIN ATING IT POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRE SENT OFFICIAL NATIONAL INSTITUTE DI EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY Stratigraphy and Structure of .the', Subsurface Cambrian OrdoVician arbonates of New York LAWRENCE V. RICKARD NEW YORK STATE MUSEUM AND SCIENCE SERVICE MAP AND CHART SERIES NUMBER 18 The Ulu:Trill) of the Slate of New .York The Stale Education Department Albany, 1973 THE UNIVERSITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Regents of the University (with years when terms expire) 1984 JOSEPH W.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Adirondack Mountains: Wilderness P- Reservation Or Bioregional Vision?
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by The Trumpeter - Journal of Ecosophy (Athabasca University) Trumpeter (1994) ISSN: 0832-6193 THE ADIRONDACK MOUNTAINS: WILDERNESS P- RESERVATION OR BIOREGIONAL VISION? Glenn Harris St. Lawrence University THE ADIRONDACK MOUNTAINS: WILDERNESS PRESERVATION OR BIOREGIONAL VISION? 2 Glenn Harris is Professor and Culpeper Teaching Fellow in the Environmental Studies Program at St. Lawrence University, Can- ton, NY, USA. There has been, for many years, considerable debate over the efficacy of the different levels of government in the solution of environmental problems. On the one hand, it is believed that a strongly authoritarian government, or oli- garchy, will be necessary if widespread disruptions to the environment are to be arrested.1 On the other hand, it is thought that meaningful and permanent so- lutions for environmental problems can only develop within political institutions permitting active involvement by people.2 This debate reflects a conflict along similar political lines in the Adirondack region of New York State. Since the establishment of the Adirondack Forest Preserve in the 1880s, there has been ongoing controversy. A fundamental issue is the balance of power between state and local governments; in the Adirondack mountains, local governments felt their powers usurped when the Adirondack Park was formed in 1892. The park contains a mix of private and state-owned land. Approximately 60 While the concerns of local government are rooted fundamentally in issues of self-determination and autonomy, they are usually expressed in terms of land- use control and taxation.4 A large amount of evidence supports the assertion that local governments desire more power to deal with land-use questions.
    [Show full text]