DOCSLIB.ORG

Rio Urbana Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Rio Urbana Project Rio Urbana Project Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration No. 2017-04 prepared by City of Oxnard Community Development Department Planning Division 214 South C Street Oxnard, California 93030 Contact: Chris Williamson, AICP prepared with the assistance of Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Ste. E San Luis Obispo, California 93401 November 2019 City of Oxnard Rio Urbana Project Table of Contents City of Oxnard CEQA Initial Study Checklist ............................................................................................ 1 Project Title ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Lead Agency Name and Address: ..................................................................................................... 1 City of Oxnard Contact Person and Phone Number ........................................................................ 1 Project Location ............................................................................................................................... 1 Co-Applicants ................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Contacts ............................................................................................................................... 1 Oxnard General Plan Designation .................................................................................................... 1 Oxnard Zoning .................................................................................................................................. 1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................... 1 Surrounding Land Uses and Setting ................................................................................................. 2 Other Public Agencies Whose Approval is Required ....................................................................... 3 Have California Native American tribes traditionally and culturally affiliated with the project area requested consultation pursuant to Public Resources Code 21080.3.1? ........................ 3 Project Plans ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Appendices ....................................................................................................................................... 3 Environmental Factors Potentially Affected ........................................................................................... 9 Determination ......................................................................................................................................10 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ..................................................................................................11 Issue Topics ...........................................................................................................................................13 I. Aesthetics and Urban Design .............................................................................................13 II. Agricultural Resources........................................................................................................17 III. Air Quality ...........................................................................................................................19 IV. Biological Resources ...........................................................................................................25 V. Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions ...............................................................29 VI. Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources ...............................................................................33 VII. Geology and Soils ...............................................................................................................35 VIII. Hazards and Hazardous Materials ......................................................................................39 IX. Hydrology and Water Quality .............................................................................................41 X. Land Use and Planning .......................................................................................................47 XI. Mineral Resources ..............................................................................................................49 i City of Oxnard Rio Urbana Project XII. Noise ...................................................................................................................................51 XIII. Population, Education, and Housing ..................................................................................57 XIV. Public Services and Recreation ..........................................................................................61 XV. Transportation and Circulation ..........................................................................................65 XVI. Utilities and Energy ............................................................................................................73 XVII. Cumulative Impacts ............................................................................................................81 References ............................................................................................................................................83 Tables Table 1 Federal and State Ambient Air Quality Standards ............................................................20 Table 2 Ambient Air Quality Data at the El Rio Monitoring Station ..............................................21 Table 3 Summary of Existing Plus Project Traffic Noise Levels ......................................................53 Table 4 Existing Peak Hour Levels of Service .................................................................................66 Table 5 Project Trip Generation.....................................................................................................67 Table 6 Existing plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service .............................................................68 Table 7 Approved and Pending Projects (Cumulative Development) Trip Generation .................69 Table 8 Cumulative Peak Hour Levels of Service ...........................................................................70 Table 9 Cumulative plus Project Peak Hour Levels of Service .......................................................71 Figures Figure 1 Project Location and Planning Area Boundaries ................................................................. 4 Figure 2 Project Site and City Land Use Designations ....................................................................... 5 Figure 3 Project Site and Existing County Zoning ............................................................................. 6 Figure 4 Proposed Site Plan .............................................................................................................. 7 Attachments Attachment 1 Notice of Intent to Adopt Attachment 2 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMRP) ii CITY OF OXNARD CEQA INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST This FINAL Initial Study-Mitigated Negative Declaration includes clarifications that were made in response to questions from the Planning Commission on October 3, 2019. The DRAFT MND, Responses to Comments, and Technical Appendices are available at the City of Oxnard Planning Division CEQA documents webpage: https://www.oxnard.org/city-department/community- development/planning/environmental-documents/ Project Title: Rio Urbana Project (Tentative Subdivision Map for Tract No. 5998) Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Oxnard Community Development Department Planning Division 214 S. C Street Oxnard, California 93030 City of Oxnard Contact Person and Phone Number: Chris Williamson, AICP, Contract Planner (805) 385-8156 Project Location: 2714 East Vineyard Avenue and Rio School Lane Assessor’s Parcel Number (APN) 145-0-232-01 Co-Applicants: El Rio School District 2500 East Vineyard Avenue Oxnard, California 93036 The Pacific Companies 430 East State Street, Suite #100 Eagle, Idaho 83616 Project Contacts: Tony Talamante, P.E. Caleb Roope Oxnard General Plan Designation: SCH – School Oxnard Zoning: N/A – Unincorporated (County of Ventura) Project Description: The proposed project includes demolition of the existing school buildings onsite (formerly El Rio Elementary School) and subdivision of the approximately 10.5 acre parcel into two parcels. The project would develop 167 condominium units in eight, three-story buildings that include a fitness center and 17 low income and 3 moderate income deed-restricted units on the 9.12-acre parcel, City of Oxnard Rio Urbana Project as well as a two-story, 15,100 square foot office building on the 1.12-acre parcel. This office development may be used to relocate the Rio School District administrative offices. The project would also include widening of Vineyard Avenue, associated parking, open space, landscaping, and amenities for on-site residents. The residential units would be made up of one- to three-bedroom attached units. The residential and office structures would have a maximum height of 38 feet. The residential portion of the project would include 431 parking spaces consisting of 169 resident garages, 163 parking spaces, and 99 guest parking spaces. The office
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Riau Natural Gas Power Project ESIA Vol.5 Technical Appendices Part F
    DRAFT Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report Project Number: 50182-001 November 2018 INO: Riau Natural Gas Power Project ESIA Vol.5_Technical Appendices Part F Prepared by ESC for the Asian Development Bank The environmental and social impact assessment is a document of the project sponsor. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB’s Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. Your attention is directed to the “Terms of Use” section of this website. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of or any territory or area. Volume 5: Technical Appendices Appendix E. KA-ANDAL Approval Letter 6 AM039100-400-GN-RPT-1014 Volume 5: Technical Appendices Appendix F. The Ministry of Agraria and Spatial Planning issued Recommendation Letter 7 AM039100-400-GN-RPT-1014 Volume 5: Technical Appendices Appendix G. Comparison of WBG EHS Guidelines with Indonesian Regulations 8 AM039100-400-GN-RPT-1014 Appendix A. Comparisons of Standards Comparison of World Bank Group IFC Environmental Health and Safety (EHS) Guidelines with Indonesian Environmental Standards Table A1: Gaseous emission for Natural Gas (all turbine types) IFC Guidelines for Thermal Power Plant Indonesian Standard** Parameter Remark Non DA (mg/m3) DA (mg/m3) Limit (mg/Nm3) Particulate Indonesian standards are N/A N/A 30 mg/Nm3 Matter stricter CO NA NA NA - NOx 51* 51* 400 mg/Nm3 IFC guidelines are stricter Indonesian standards are SO2 NA NA 150 mg/Nm3 stricter Opacity NA NA N/A - Note: The figures in red are the more stringent requirements **At dry gas, excess O2 content 15% **Gas volume counted on standard (25 deg C and 1 bar atm) **this is for 95% normal operation in 3 (three) months period ***Source: Ministry of Environmental Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Social and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant Near Swakopmund, Namibia
    Rössing Uranium Limited SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT FOR THE PROPOSED RÖSSING URANIUM DESALINATION PLANT NEAR SWAKOPMUND, NAMIBIA DRAFT SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT REFERENCE NO: 110914 DATE: NOVEMBER 2014 PREPARED BY ON BEHALF OF Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant: Draft SEMP PROJECT DETAILS PROJECT: Social and Environmental Impact Assessment for the Proposed Rössing Uranium Desalination Plant, near Swakopmund, Namibia AUTHORS: Andries van der Merwe (Aurecon) Patrick Killick (Aurecon) Simon Charter (SLR Namibia) Werner Petrick (SLR Namibia) SEIA SPECIALISTS: Birds –Mike and Ann Scott (African Conservation Services CC) Heritage – Dr John Kinahan (Quaternary Research Services) Marine ecology – Dr Andrea Pulfrich (Pisces Environmental Services (Pty) Ltd) Noise - Nicolette von Reiche (Airshed Planning Professionals) Socio-economic - Auriol Ashby (Ashby Associates CC) - Dr Jonthan Barnes (Design and Development ServicesCC) Visual – Stephen Stead (Visual Resource Management Africa) Wastewater discharge modelling –Christoph Soltau (WSP Group) Shoreline dynamics - Christoph Soltau (WSP Group) PROPONENT: Rio Tinto Rössing Uranium Limited REPORT STATUS: Draft Social and Environmental Management Plan REPORT NUMBER: 9408/110914 STATUS DATE: 28 November 2014 .......................................... .......................................... Patrick Killick Simon Charter Senior Practitioner: Aurecon Environment and Advisory Senior Practitioner: SLR Environmental Consulting .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Residential Wood Combustion Technology Review Appendices
    EPA-600/R-98-174b December 1998 Residential Wood Combustion Technology Review Volume 2. Appendices Prepared by: James E. Houck and Paul E.Tiegs OMNI Environmental Services, Inc. 5465 SW Western Avenue, Suite G Beaverton, OR 97005 EPA Purchase Order 7C-R285-NASX EPA Project Officer: Robert C. McCrillis U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (MD-61) National Risk Management Research Laboratory Air Pollution Prevention and Control Division Research Triangle Park, NC 27711 Prepared for: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Research and Development Washington, D.C. 20460 A-i Abstract A review of the current states-of-the-art of residential wood combustion (RWC) was conducted. The key environmental parameter of concern was the air emission of particles. The technological status of all major RWC categories was reviewed. These were cordwood stoves, fireplaces, masonry heaters, pellet stoves, and wood-fired central heating furnaces. Advances in technology achieved since the mid-1980's were the primary focus. These study objectives were accomplished by reviewing the published literature and by interviewing nationally recognized RWC experts. The key findings of the review included: (1) The NSPS certification procedure only qualitatively predicts the level of emissions from wood heaters under actual use in homes, (2) Wood stove durability varies with model and a method to assess the durability problem is controversial, (3) Nationally the overwhelming majority of RWC air emissions are from non-certified devices (primarily from older non-certified woodstoves), (4) New technology appliances and fuels can reduce emissions significantly, (5) The ISO and EPA NSPS test procedures are quite dissimilar and data generated by the two procedures would not be comparable, and, (6) The effect of wood moisture and wood type on particulate emission appears to be real but to be less than an order of magnitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Land for Sale in Fillmore, CA “The Last Best Small Town in Southern California”
    Land for Sale in Fillmore, CA “The Last Best Small Town in Southern California” $750,000 27,436 SF Commercial Highway Zoned Land (CH) Table of Contents 4. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Investment Overview Investment Highlights 6. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Local Map Regional Map Land Use Map Zoning Map Plot Map Demographics 13. DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION Zoning Ordinances Development Standards Econmic Development New Developments 16. COMPARABLES On-Market LandSale Recent Land Sales Retail Sold Comp 19. MARKET OVERVIEW Market Highlights City of Fillmore Economy Investment Contacts: Gary Cohen James DeBuiser Direct: (805) 351-7143 Direct: (805) 351-7144 Cell: (818) 804-1227 Cell: (805) 368-4313 Lic. 00988655 Lic. 01965942 [email protected] [email protected] The information contained herein is proprietary and strictly confidential. It is intended to be reviewed only by the party receiving it from mar- cus & millichap real estate investment services, inc (“m&m”) and should not be made available to any other person or entity without the writ- ten consent of m&m. This material has been prepared to provide summary, unverified information to prospective purchasers, and to establish only a preliminary level of interest in the subject property. The information contained herein is not a substitute for a thorough independent due dillengence investigation. M&m, as a real estate licensee is not qualified to discuss or advise on legal, accounting, or other matters outside of those permutted by state law. M&m has not made any investigation, and
    [Show full text]
  • United Water Conservation District Iron and Manganese Treatment Project Proposal Contents (Cont'd)
    WaterSMART Drought Response United Water Program: Conservation District Iron Drought and Manganese Resiliency Treatment Project Project Grants for FY 2018 February 13, Bureau of Reclamation FOA No. BOR‐DO‐18‐F008 2018 Proposal Contents Proposal Contents ................................................................................................ i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................ iii List of Figures ............................................................................................................................... iii List of Acronyms ........................................................................................................................... iii Section 1: Technical Proposal and Evaluation Criteria ................................ 1 1.1 Executive Summary ............................................................................... 1 1.2 Background Data ................................................................................... 4 1.2.1 Proposed Project Location ......................................................... 4 1.2.2 Water Supplies and Demands .................................................... 4 1.2.3 Water Delivery System............................................................... 5 1.2.4 Past Working Relationship with Reclamation ............................. 5 1.3 Technical Project Description ................................................................ 6 1.3.1 Project
    [Show full text]
  • Nature of Incident: Start Smart Program Location: Camarillo Police Station 3701 E. Las Posas Road Camarillo, Ca. 93010] Date &Am
    Camarillo - Start Smart Program 1/28/2013 3:30:00 PM Nature of Incident: Start Smart Program Location: Camarillo Police Station 3701 E. Las Posas Road Camarillo, Ca. 93010] Date & Time: Thursday 21st @ 5:30 pm Unit Responsible: Camarillo Traffic Bureau Narrative: The Camarillo Police Department will be hosting a program to educate newly licensed and future drivers. The 'Start Smart' Program is a cooperative effort between the California Highway Patrol, Camarillo Police Department, teenage drivers, and their parents. In an attempt to remain proactive and not reactive, Start Smart is designed to help young drivers and their parents/guardians understand the responsibilities associated with driving a motor vehicle. Start Smart will show how a poor choice behind the wheel can change the lives of everyone involved. Our goal is to raise awareness and reduce the number of teen-related injuries and deaths due to collisions. Interested parents are asked to call Sergeant Renee Ferguson at 805-388-5132 for more information and for reservations call the Camarillo Police Department Community Resource Unit at 805-388-5155 to make a reservation. Space is limited to 20 students and their parents. There is no charge to attend the program. Deputy Preparing Media Deputy Robert Steele Release: Media Release Date: January 22, 2013 Follow-Up Contact: Sergeant Renee Ferguson (805) 388-5132 Approved by: Captain Bruce Macedo Ventura County Crime Stoppers will pay up to $1,000 reward for information, which leads to the arrest and criminal complaint against the person(s) responsible for this crime. The caller may remain anonymous. The call is not recorded.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report Good Neighbor Environmental Board
    Annual Report of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board A Presidential and Congressional Advisory Committee on U.S.-Mexico Border Environmental and Infrastructure Issues April 1997 THE GOOD NEIGHBOR ENVIRONMENTAL BOARD AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON U.S.- MEXICO BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE ISSUES The President The Speaker of the House of Representatives The Vice President The Good Neighbor Environmental Board advisory committee was established by Congress in 1994, to address U.S.-Mexico border environmental and infrastructure issues and needs. The Board is comprised of a broad spectrum of individuals from business, nonprofit organizations, and state and local governments from the four states which border Mexico. The Board also has representation from eight U.S. departments and agencies. The legislation establishing the Board requires it to submit an annual report to the President and the Congress. On behalf of the Good Neighbor Environmental Board, I am happy to present this second annual report. During the past year, the Board has had extensive discussions about critical issues facing the border region, including receiving input from citizens in each of the communities where we met, and has developed a series of recommendations reflected in the enclosed report. The report and recommendations focus on changing the development paradigm along the U.S.-Mexico border--to begin to establish a sustainable development vision for the region. In addition to conventional environmental issues, the Board is also addressing health, transportation, housing, and economic development issues. The current recommendations relate largely to implementation of the new binational Border XXI framework and plan, coordination and leveraging of federal programs in the border region, encouragement of greater private sector participation, and development of needed infrastructure.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary the Ranch Fire Started October 20, 2007 Near
    USDA­FOREST SERVICE FS­2500­8 (6/06) Date of Report: 11/05/07 BURNED­AREA REPORT (Reference FSH 2509.13) Executive Summary The Ranch Fire started October 20, 2007 near Townsend Peak, southwest of Templin Highway and Interstate 5 on the Angeles National Forest. Intense Santa Ana winds peaking above 100 mph on the ridge tops drove the fire southwest across 13000 acres of the Angeles National Forest then onto the Los Padres National Forest and private lands in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties burning 58,401 acres total. Most of total acreage burned during the first 48 hours after ignition. The fire reached its final boundary on October 26, and was fully contained on November 3. Because of the speed of this fire suppression impacts on National Forest land were limited to two miles of dozer line on the Angeles N.F., and some hand line and water/retardant drops along the west side of the fire on the Los Padres N. F. Approximately 14,000 acres burned on the Los Padres National Forest, 13,000 acres burned on the Angeles National Forest, 1900 acres on the Hopper Mountain Wildlife Refuge, 1400 acres on BLM land, and 28,000 on private land near Val Verde and Hasley Canyon. The Los Padres manages 8000 acres of the Angeles National Forest within the burn perimeter and east of Piru Creek. Fifth­field watersheds within the Ranch Fire area used for BAER analysis include: Castaic, Sespe Creek, middle Santa Clara River and lower Piru Creek. The BAER team leader was assigned on October 23 and assembled a team which finalized field work for soils and hydrology by October 30 with other field work finalized on November 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 3.12 Hydrology and Water Quality
    3.12 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This section describes the drainage features, stormwater quality, flooding hazards, and flood-protection improvements within the City’s Planning Area. Regulatory agencies governing stormwater quality and flooding hazards are also discussed. The City’s Planning Area is comprised of the City’s boundaries and adopted Sphere of Influence (SOI). The County’s Planning Area consists of unincorporated land within the One Valley One Vision (OVOV) Planning Area boundaries that is outside the City’s boundaries and adopted SOI. Together the City and County Planning Areas comprise the OVOV Planning Area. With implementation of the proposed General Plan goals, objectives, and policies potential impacts on hydrology and water quality would be less than significant. EXISTING CONDITIONS Surface Water Drainage Patterns within City’s Planning Area Surface water drainage patterns are dependent on topography, the amount and location of impervious surfaces, and the type of flood control that is located in an area. The size, or magnitude, of a flood is described by a term called a “recurrence interval.” By studying a long period of flow record for a stream, hydrologists estimate the size of a flood that would have a likelihood of occurring during various intervals. For example, a five-year flood event would occur, on the average, once every five years (and would have a 20 percent chance of occurring in any one year). Although a 100-year flood event is expected to happen only once in a century, there is a 1 percent chance that a flood of that size could happen during any year.
    [Show full text]
  • EHS Guidelines for Themal Power Plants
    Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines THERMAL POWER PLANTS DRAFT FOR SECOND PUBLIC CONSULTATION—MAY/JUNE 2017 WORLD BANK GROUP Environmental, Health, and Safety Guidelines for Thermal Power Plants Introduction 1. The Environmental, Health, and Safety (EHS) Guidelines are technical reference documents with general and industry-specific examples of Good International Industry Practice (GIIP).1 When one or more members of the World Bank Group are involved in a project, these EHS Guidelines are applied as required by their respective policies and standards. These industry sector EHS guidelines are designed to be used together with the General EHS Guidelines document, which provides guidance to users on common EHS issues potentially applicable to all industry sectors. For complex projects, use of multiple industry-sector guidelines may be necessary. A complete list of industry-sector guidelines can be found at: www.ifc.org/ehsguidelines. 2. The EHS Guidelines contain the performance levels and measures that are generally considered to be achievable in new facilities by existing technology at reasonable costs. Application of the EHS Guidelines to existing facilities may involve the establishment of site-specific targets, based on environmental assessments and/or environmental audits as appropriate, with an appropriate timetable for achieving them. 3. The applicability of the EHS Guidelines should be tailored to the hazards and risks established for each project on the basis of the results of an environmental assessment (EA) in which site-specific variables, such as host country context, assimilative capacity of the environment, and other project factors, are taken into account. The applicability of specific technical recommendations should be based on the professional opinion of qualified and experienced persons.
    [Show full text]
  • BTF Incident Objectives and Requirements 2011
    Bridger-Teton National Forest WFDSS Incident Objectives and Requirements 2011 Incident Objectives and Requirements This list was compiled from objectives included in old WFSAs (Blind Trail, Boulder, Cow Camp, East Table) and requirements in the FMP. CONTENTS INCIDENT OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................... 2 General ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Economic .................................................................................................................................... 2 Local business/outfitters and guides ................................................................................. 2 Range ..................................................................................................................................... 2 Recreation .............................................................................................................................. 2 Special uses and private property ...................................................................................... 2 Environmental ........................................................................................................................... 3 Air quality ............................................................................................................................... 3 Cultural resources ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Framework for AIRSHED PLANNING
    Provincial Framework for AIRSHED PLANNING CONTENTS ii PREFACE iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 INTRODUCTION 7 THE PLANNING FRAMEWORK 9 Stage 1: Evaluate the need for a plan 12 Stage 2: Identify and engage stakeholders 14 Stage 3: Investigate planning synergies 16 Stage 4: Determine priority sources 18 Stage 5: Develop the plan 20 Stage 6: Implement, monitor, and report 22 CONCLUSION 23 REFERENCES 26 GLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS 29 Appendix 1: Background to the framework 33 Appendix 2: Air quality planning and information 35 Appendix 3: Examples of related planning processes 36 Appendix 4: Examples of best practices and local bylaws i PREFACE This document describes a framework for preparing air quality management plans, or "airshed plans," in British Columbia. As such, it should be of interest to a broad range of local stakeholders in air quality, including local and regional governments, health professionals, industry, businesses, environmental and community interest groups, and private citizens. The framework is designed to help those considering or undertaking a planning process to better understand what the Province of British Columbia (the Province) expects from an airshed plan in terms of approach and content. The intent is to encourage greater consistency and efficiency in planning efforts, towards implementation of the Canada-Wide Standards for particulate matter and ozone – key pollutants of concern due to their health and environmental impacts. The Draft Provincial Framework for Airshed Planning represents the culmination of a development process that started in 2005 and included two rounds of stakeholder consultation (see Appendix 1). More than 60 participants contributed to these consultations, drawn from local and regional government, industry, academia, health authorities, and environmental and community organizations.
    [Show full text]