Saturation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Saturation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink Chapter 6 Saturation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink Josep G. Canadell · Diane E. Pataki · Roger Gifford · Richard A. Houghton · Yiqi Luo · Michael R. Raupach Pete Smith · Will Steffen most of the biological sinks will eventually level-off and 6.1 Introduction subsequently declined to zero (hereafter referred as “sink saturation”) whereby no further C will be removed from There is strong evidence that the terrestrial biosphere the atmosphere. has acted as a net carbon (C) sink over the last two and Coupled with this sink decline, global warming and half decades. Its strength is highly variable year-to-year deforestation have the potential to destabilize large bio- ranging from 0.3 to 5.0 Pg C yr–1; an amount of signifi- spheric C pools (hereafter referred as “vulnerable C pools”) cant magnitude compared to the emission of about which would add CO2 to the atmosphere. This C source 7 Pg C yr–1 from fossil fuel burning (Prentice et al. 2001; component will further diminish the net gains of C sinks Schimel et al. 2001; Sabine et al. 2004). Uncertainties as- and could even diminish the sink strength beyond zero, sociated with C emissions from land-use change are large. thereby moving from being a C sink to a source during On average, the terrestrial C sink is responsible for re- this century. Such an eventuality would put further pres- moving from the atmosphere approximately one third sure on society to select higher targets of CO2 emission of the CO2 emitted from fossil fuel combustion, thereby reductions from fossil fuel burning. slowing the build-up of atmospheric CO2. The ocean sink In this paper, we first introduce briefly the current is of similar magnitude (Sabine et al. 2004). Given the understanding of the global distribution of C sources and international efforts to stabilize atmospheric CO2 con- sinks. Second, we discuss processes thought to be respon- centration and climate (i.e., Kyoto Protocol, C trading sible for the current terrestrial C sink and their likely markets), the terrestrial C sink can be viewed as a sub- future dynamics highlighting their potential contribu- sidy to our global economy worth trillions of dollars. tion to saturation of the terrestrial C sink. Third, we dis- Because many aspects of the terrestrial C sink are ame- cuss the dynamics of the future terrestrial C balance nable to purposeful management, its basis and dynam- based on results from stand-alone and fully coupled car- ics need to be well understood. bon-climate models, and their accuracy in representing There is a sparse understanding of the multiple pro- various physiological and ecological sink/source pro- cesses responsible for the terrestrial C sink, the relative cesses. Recommendations for future research are made importance of each of them, and their future dynamics. at the end of the chapter. Such information is needed to predict the future strength and distribution of biospheric terrestrial sinks, and there- fore critical for the design of future pathways of decar- 6.2 Location of the Current Terrestrial Carbon Sinks bonization. Terrestrial biospheric models and fully carbon- The dual constraint of the measured global atmospheric coupled General Circulation Models (GCMs) are pro- CO2 concentration growth rate and the relatively weak gressively incorporating more C processes thought to north-south CO2 concentration gradient indicate a net drive significant carbon-climate feedbacks. However, sink of about 2 Pg C yr–1 in the northern extratropics being limited by poor understanding and the slow pro- (Tans et al. 1990). These observations are corroborated δ 13 cess of building ever more complex models, they still by additional information from C and O2/N2, as well represent a partial set of processes. This limits the abil- as increasingly sophisticated inverse modeling with aug- ity to produce robust projections of the biosphere’s role mented flask data (Rayner et al. 1999; Kaminiski et al. in the future atmospheric CO2 growth and its impacts 1999; Gurney et al. 2002). on climate change. Despite the robustness of the global and latitudinal In this paper we demonstrate that the underlying ecol- average estimates, inverse modeling calculations are ogy of terrestrial biospheric CO2 sinks suggests that, de- poorly constrained at the continental scale, particularly spite having the potential for increased C sink owing to with regard to the longitudinal partition of the sink. atmospheric and climate change over the next decades, Model intercomparisons suggest that the Northern Hemi- In: Canadell JG, Pataki D, Pitelka L (eds) (2007) Terrestrial Ecosystems in a Changing World. The IGBP Series, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg 60 CHAPTER 6 · Saturation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink sphere terrestrial sink is relatively evenly distributed processes are soil respiration in response to warming, across North America, Europe and Asia, with boreal permafrost thawing and subsequent decomposition of North America being C neutral (Gurney et al. 2002; Yuen organic matter, fires, deforestation, and peatland drain- et al. 2005). Large uncertainties still remain for north- age. Sink saturation occurs when the increase in efflux ern Africa, tropical America, temperate Asia and boreal becomes equal to the increase in uptake for a given pe- Asia. Interpretations of global distributions of atmo- riod of time producing no increase in net uptake. spheric O2/N2 ratio (Keeling et al. 1996) and inverse When assessing whether and when C sinks might analyses (Rayner et al. 1999; Gurney et al. 2002) conclude saturate in the future, there are two types of dynamics that tropical ecosystems are not a strong net sink, and to be considered: (i) Saturation of C uptake processes most likely they are C neutral. Given that tropical forests which refers to the diminishing sensitivity of a sink pro- are well documented as current large CO2 emitters via cess to an external forcing or stimulus (e.g., CO2 fertili- deforestation, this implies that there must be a strong zation effect on photosynthesis as atmospheric CO2 in- balancing tropical sink of equivalent magnitude to that creases); and (ii) increasing C emission driven by exter- of emissions from tropical deforestation. During the nal forcing (e.g., warming effects on heterotrophic res- 1980s–1990s this was estimated to be 0.6 to 2.2 Pg C yr–1 piration). (DeFries et al. 2002; Archard et al. 2002; Houghton 2003). We refer to C pool saturation when the annual emis- Atmospheric data provides limited information about sion itself becomes equal to the annual uptake which in- the processes driving terrestrial sinks. Such information volves two types of processes: (i) the “fast response” requires the addition of ground-based observations, ex- C uptake (e.g., net photosynthesis) is matched by the “fast periments, and modeling (Canadell et al. 2000; Global response” C emission (e.g., heterotrophic respiration), or Carbon Project 2003). Processes responsible for the sinks (ii) long timescale, “slow response” processes cause pools in the tropical, mid-, and high-latitudes need to be equally to reach maximum size (e.g., tree death rate matches new understood since the saturation of any one can have large tree growth rate or, for soil, the capacity for organic mat- impacts on the growth rate of atmospheric CO2. ter stabilization by clay surfaces is exhausted). 6.3 Dynamics of Processes that Contribute 6.4 Processes Contributing to Terrestrial Carbon to Carbon Sink Saturation Sink Saturation A decrease in the long term terrestrial net CO2 sink can Our current understanding of the global net C sinks re- arise from a decrease in the C uptake component or in- quires invoking three types of processes (Table 6.1): crease in the emission component (see Box 6.1). Key sink (i) processes driven by changes in atmospheric composi- processes are CO2 fertilization of photosynthesis, N fertili- tion (e.g., CO2 fertilization on photosynthesis, nitrogen (N) zation of net primary production, woody vegetation thick- deposition fertilization, pollution damage); (ii) processes ening and encroachment, forest regrowth in abandoned driven by climate change (e.g., temperature and precipi- cropland, and afforestation/resforestation. Key C emission tation effects on gross primary production and het- erotrophic respiration); and (iii) processes driven by land-use change or land management (e.g., deforestation, Box 6.1. Description of GPP, NPP, NEP and NBP forest regrowth, woody encroachment, forest thickening Plants take up carbon dioxide via photosynthesis. The sum of due to fire suppression, afforestation and reforestation, photosynthesis over a year is termed Gross Primary Produc- changes in soil C pools under cultivation and grazing). tivity (GPP). The actual C fixed into plants, the Net Primary Productivity (NPP) of an ecosystem or growth of an individual The relative strengths of each of these processes contrib- plant, is the balance between GPP and the C lost through plant uting to the current sink and its spatial distribution re- respiration (i.e., the construction and maintenance cost). It is main largely to be evaluated (Houghton 2002; Smith 2005). not until C losses by microbial respiration (heterotrophic res- piration, Rh) in litter and soil, and by herbivory are accounted for that we obtain the net C balance of an ecosystem. This net balance is termed Net Ecosystem Productivity (NEP). How- 6.4.1 Processes Driven by Atmospheric ever, when considering long periods of time and large regions (or the whole terrestrial biosphere for that matter) we need to Composition Change include other processes that contribute to loss of C such as, fires, harvest, erosion, and export of C in river flow. The eco- 6.4.1.1 CO2 Fertilization Effect system C balance measured over the full disturbance/recov- ery cycle is often termed the Net Biome Productivity (NBP) which for a system in equilibrium is zero. Continuous enrich- Short term responses of leaf net photosynthetic rate to ment of the resource base on which the biome depends by CO2 CO2 concentration saturate at around 800–1 000 ppm.
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Reforestation in Carbon Sequestration
    New Forests (2019) 50:115–137 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-018-9655-3 The role of reforestation in carbon sequestration L. E. Nave1,2 · B. F. Walters3 · K. L. Hofmeister4 · C. H. Perry3 · U. Mishra5 · G. M. Domke3 · C. W. Swanston6 Received: 12 October 2017 / Accepted: 24 June 2018 / Published online: 9 July 2018 © Springer Nature B.V. 2018 Abstract In the United States (U.S.), the maintenance of forest cover is a legal mandate for federally managed forest lands. More broadly, reforestation following harvesting, recent or historic disturbances can enhance numerous carbon (C)-based ecosystem services and functions. These include production of woody biomass for forest products, and mitigation of atmos- pheric ­CO2 pollution and climate change by sequestering C into ecosystem pools where it can be stored for long timescales. Nonetheless, a range of assessments and analyses indicate that reforestation in the U.S. lags behind its potential, with the continuation of ecosystem services and functions at risk if reforestation is not increased. In this context, there is need for multiple independent analyses that quantify the role of reforestation in C sequestration, from ecosystems up to regional and national levels. Here, we describe the methods and report the fndings of a large-scale data synthesis aimed at four objectives: (1) estimate C storage in major ecosystem pools in forest and other land cover types; (2) quan- tify sources of variation in ecosystem C pools; (3) compare the impacts of reforestation and aforestation on C pools; (4) assess whether these results hold or diverge across ecore- gions.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Carbon Sink in Borneo's Forests Halted by Drought
    Corrected: Publisher correction ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01997-0 OPEN Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects Lan Qie et al. Less than half of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions remain in the atmosphere. While carbon balance models imply large carbon uptake in tropical forests, direct on-the-ground observations are still lacking in Southeast Asia. Here, using long-term plot monitoring records fi −1 1234567890 of up to half a century, we nd that intact forests in Borneo gained 0.43 Mg C ha per year (95% CI 0.14–0.72, mean period 1988–2010) in above-ground live biomass carbon. These results closely match those from African and Amazonian plot networks, suggesting that the world’s remaining intact tropical forests are now en masse out-of-equilibrium. Although both pan-tropical and long-term, the sink in remaining intact forests appears vulnerable to climate and land use changes. Across Borneo the 1997–1998 El Niño drought temporarily halted the carbon sink by increasing tree mortality, while fragmentation persistently offset the sink and turned many edge-affected forests into a carbon source to the atmosphere. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.Q. (email: [email protected]) #A full list of authors and their affliations appears at the end of the paper NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8: 1966 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01997-0 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01997-0 ver the past half-century land and ocean carbon sinks Nevertheless, crucial evidence required to establish whether the have removed ~55% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions to forest sink is pan-tropical remains missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Influences Mycorrhizal Fungal–Plant Interactions, but Conclusions Are Limited by Geographical Study Bias
    CONCEPTS & SYNTHESIS EMPHASIZING NEW IDEAS TO STIMULATE RESEARCH IN ECOLOGY Ecology, 101(4), 2020, e02978 © 2020 by the Ecological Society of America Climate change influences mycorrhizal fungal–plant interactions, but conclusions are limited by geographical study bias 1,5 2,3,4 ALISON E. BENNETT AND AIMEE T. C LASSEN 1Department of Evolution, Ecology and Organismal Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210 USA 2Rubenstein School of Environment & Natural Resources, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA 3The Gund Institute for Environment, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05405 USA 4Center for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, The Natural History Museum of Denmark,University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen Ø DK-2100 Denmark Citation: Bennett, A. E. and A. T. Classen. 2020. Climate change influences mycorrhizal fungal–plant interactions, but conclusions are limited by geographical study bias. Ecology 101(4):e02978. 10.1002/ecy. 2978 Abstract. Climate change is altering the interactions among plants and soil organisms in ways that will alter the structure and function of ecosystems. We reviewed the literature and developed a map of studies focused on how the three most common types of mycorrhizal fungi (arbuscular mycorrhizal [AM], ectomycorrhizal [EcM], and ericoid mycorrhizal [ErM] fungi) respond to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations (eCO2), climatic warming, and changes in the distribution of precipitation. Broadly, we ask how do mycorrhizal fungi respond to climate change, how do these responses vary by fungal type, and how do mycorrhizal traits influence plant adaptation, movement, or extinction in response to climatic change? First, we found that 92% of studies were conducted in the northern hemisphere, and plant host, ecosys- tem type and study location were only correlated with each other in the northern hemisphere because studies across all mycorrhizal fungal types were only common in the northern hemi- sphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Storage
    277 6 Ocean storage Coordinating Lead Authors Ken Caldeira (United States), Makoto Akai (Japan) Lead Authors Peter Brewer (United States), Baixin Chen (China), Peter Haugan (Norway), Toru Iwama (Japan), Paul Johnston (United Kingdom), Haroon Kheshgi (United States), Qingquan Li (China), Takashi Ohsumi (Japan), Hans Pörtner (Germany), Chris Sabine (United States), Yoshihisa Shirayama (Japan), Jolyon Thomson (United Kingdom) Contributing Authors Jim Barry (United States), Lara Hansen (United States) Review Editors Brad De Young (Canada), Fortunat Joos (Switzerland) 278 IPCC Special Report on Carbon dioxide Capture and Storage Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 279 6.7 Environmental impacts, risks, and risk management 298 6.1 Introduction and background 279 6.7.1 Introduction to biological impacts and risk 298 6.1.1 Intentional storage of CO2 in the ocean 279 6.7.2 Physiological effects of CO2 301 6.1.2 Relevant background in physical and chemical 6.7.3 From physiological mechanisms to ecosystems 305 oceanography 281 6.7.4 Biological consequences for water column release scenarios 306 6.2 Approaches to release CO2 into the ocean 282 6.7.5 Biological consequences associated with CO2 6.2.1 Approaches to releasing CO2 that has been captured, lakes 307 compressed, and transported into the ocean 282 6.7.6 Contaminants in CO2 streams 307 6.2.2 CO2 storage by dissolution of carbonate minerals 290 6.7.7 Risk management 307 6.2.3 Other ocean storage approaches 291 6.7.8 Social aspects; public and stakeholder perception 307 6.3 Capacity and fractions retained
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Carbon Sink in Borneo’S Forests Halted By
    ARTICLE DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01997-0 OPEN Long-term carbon sink in Borneo’s forests halted by drought and vulnerable to edge effects Lan Qie et al. Less than half of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions remain in the atmosphere. While carbon balance models imply large carbon uptake in tropical forests, direct on-the-ground observations are still lacking in Southeast Asia. Here, using long-term plot monitoring records fi −1 1234567890 of up to half a century, we nd that intact forests in Borneo gained 0.43 Mg C ha per year (95% CI 0.14–0.72, mean period 1988–2010) above-ground live biomass. These results closely match those from African and Amazonian plot networks, suggesting that the world’s remaining intact tropical forests are now en masse out-of-equilibrium. Although both pan- tropical and long-term, the sink in remaining intact forests appears vulnerable to climate and land use changes. Across Borneo the 1997–1998 El Niño drought temporarily halted the carbon sink by increasing tree mortality, while fragmentation persistently offset the sink and turned many edge-affected forests into a carbon source to the atmosphere. Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to L.Q. (email: [email protected]) #A full list of authors and their affliations appears at the end of the paper NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | 8: 1966 | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01997-0 | www.nature.com/naturecommunications 1 ARTICLE NATURE COMMUNICATIONS | DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01997-0 ver the past half-century land and ocean carbon sinks Nevertheless, crucial evidence required to establish whether the have removed ~55% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions to forest sink is pan-tropical remains missing.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry As a Natural Climate Solution: the Positive Outcomes of Negative Carbon Emissions
    PNW Pacific Northwest Research Station INSIDE Tracking Carbon Through Forests and Streams . 2 Mapping Carbon in Soil. .3 Alaska Land Carbon Project . .4 What’s Next in Carbon Cycle Research . 4 FINDINGS issue two hundred twenty-five / march 2020 “Science affects the way we think together.” Lewis Thomas Forestry as a Natural Climate Solution: The Positive Outcomes of Negative Carbon Emissions IN SUMMARY Forests are considered a natural solu- tion for mitigating climate change David D’A more because they absorb and store atmos- pheric carbon. With Alaska boasting 129 million acres of forest, this state can play a crucial role as a carbon sink for the United States. Until recently, the vol- ume of carbon stored in Alaska’s forests was unknown, as was their future car- bon sequestration capacity. In 2007, Congress passed the Energy Independence and Security Act that directed the Department of the Inte- rior to assess the stock and flow of carbon in all the lands and waters of the United States. In 2012, a team com- posed of researchers with the U.S. Geological Survey, U.S. Forest Ser- vice, and the University of Alaska assessed how much carbon Alaska’s An unthinned, even-aged stand in southeast Alaska. New research on carbon sequestration in the region’s coastal temperate rainforests, and how this may change over the next 80 years, is helping land managers forests can sequester. evaluate tradeoffs among management options. The researchers concluded that ecosys- tems of Alaska could be a substantial “Stones have been known to move sunlight, water, and atmospheric carbon diox- carbon sink.
    [Show full text]
  • The Need for Fast Near-Term Climate Mitigation to Slow Feedbacks and Tipping Points
    The Need for Fast Near-Term Climate Mitigation to Slow Feedbacks and Tipping Points Critical Role of Short-lived Super Climate Pollutants in the Climate Emergency Background Note DRAFT: 27 September 2021 Institute for Governance Center for Human Rights and & Sustainable Development (IGSD) Environment (CHRE/CEDHA) Lead authors Durwood Zaelke, Romina Picolotti, Kristin Campbell, & Gabrielle Dreyfus Contributing authors Trina Thorbjornsen, Laura Bloomer, Blake Hite, Kiran Ghosh, & Daniel Taillant Acknowledgements We thank readers for comments that have allowed us to continue to update and improve this note. About the Institute for Governance & About the Center for Human Rights and Sustainable Development (IGSD) Environment (CHRE/CEDHA) IGSD’s mission is to promote just and Originally founded in 1999 in Argentina, the sustainable societies and to protect the Center for Human Rights and Environment environment by advancing the understanding, (CHRE or CEDHA by its Spanish acronym) development, and implementation of effective aims to build a more harmonious relationship and accountable systems of governance for between the environment and people. Its work sustainable development. centers on promoting greater access to justice and to guarantee human rights for victims of As part of its work, IGSD is pursuing “fast- environmental degradation, or due to the non- action” climate mitigation strategies that will sustainable management of natural resources, result in significant reductions of climate and to prevent future violations. To this end, emissions to limit temperature increase and other CHRE fosters the creation of public policy that climate impacts in the near-term. The focus is on promotes inclusive socially and environmentally strategies to reduce non-CO2 climate pollutants, sustainable development, through community protect sinks, and enhance urban albedo with participation, public interest litigation, smart surfaces, as a complement to cuts in CO2.
    [Show full text]
  • Novartis Carbon-Sink Forestry Projects
    Novartis Business Services Health, Safety and Environment Novartis carbon-sink forestry projects An inclusive business approach to fighting climate change and supporting local communities 2 | NOVARTIS CARBON-SINK FORESTRY PROJECTS China Sichuan Forestry Project Mali Colombia Jatropha Hacienda Mali Initiative El Manantial Argentina Santo Domingo Estate Contents Energy and climate at Novartis 4 Argentina: Santo Domingo Estate 6 Mali: Jatropha Mali Initiative 8 China: Sichuan Forestry Project 10 Colombia: Hacienda El Manantial 12 Performance summary and outlook 14 NOVARTIS CARBON-SINK FORESTRY PROJECTS | 3 Four carbon-sink forestry projects around the world United Nations Santo Jatropha Sichuan Hacienda Sustainable Development Goals Domingo Mali Forestry El Manantial (SDGs) Estate Initiative Project Goal 7 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all Goal 8 Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment, and decent work for all Goal 13 Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts Goal 15 Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat deserti fication and halt and reverse land degradation, and halt biodiversity loss Goal 17 Strengthen the means of implementation and revitalize the global partnership for sustainable development 4 | EnERGY AND CLIMATE AT NOVARTIS Energy and climate at Novartis At Novartis, minimizing our environmental footprint our 2020 GHG reduction target of 30% reduction is an integral part of our Corporate Responsibility versus 2010, steadily reducing our total Scope 1 and strategy and respect for the environment a guiding Scope 2 emissions year after year. principle behind all our activities. Using energy efficiently, switching to renewable energy sources While supporting Novartis in meeting our emission and reducing greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) are reduction target, our four forestry projects provide priority areas for our company.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Sink Or Carbon Source? Instruction Manual Carbon Sink Or Carbon Source?
    Carbon Sink or Carbon Source? Instruction Manual Carbon Sink or Carbon Source? This activity is designed for adults, families, or kids ages 9 and older with their families. Some younger children have been engaged by this activity and can help with sorting. Materials Setup Sink or Source setup (wooden 1. Clip the six metal dowels into their holders, with the weighted stand, wooden piece for the top, ends on the educator side of the cart. Try to line up the center six metal dowels) groove on the dowel with the center of the white dowel that holds the metal holders. Cards with hooks 2. Check alignment—the dowels should all fall at roughly the iPad same angle. 3. Put the top wooden piece in, so that the dowels are parallel to the floor. 4. Array the images so the visitors can see them. 5. Get the iPad from the Magic Planet cart. Open the program “GoodReader.” If the Sink/Source activity is not showing, touch the center of the screen and touch “My Documents” in the upper left-hand corner. Select the Sink/Source document. Touch the center of the screen to get rid of the borders. Set it up so that visitors can see it. Doing the activity 1. Ask visitors what they know about carbon sources and carbon sinks. They may be familiar with these terms, or not. They may be able to figure out carbon source fairly easily and need help figuring out carbon sink. A carbon source is something that releases carbon into the atmosphere, and a sink is something that removes carbon from the atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Edition: Understanding Methane's Potential to Amplify Or
    A Publication of the Climate Institute | Protecting the balance between climate and life on Earth Special Edition: Understanding Methane’s Potential to Amplify or Reduce Arctic Climate Change CLIMATE INSTITUTE Summer 2015 Volume 27, No. 1 Climate Alert A MESSAGE FROM THE CHIEF SCIENTIST Methane—the Other Carbon-Containing Greenhouse Gas Commentary by we first need to find an alternative nations would by now be well along Michael MacCracken means for securing the services that in cutting their emissions. Unfortu- fossil energy has been providing and nately, that has not been the case. In With good reason, more, given the continuing growth in the search for emissions pathways significant attention the global population. that could contribute to a near-term is being devoted to The global average temperature is slowing of the overall greenhouse sharply cutting emis- now up about 0.9°C over its prein- warming influence, we now have to sions of carbon diox- dustrial average and projected to rise go back and separate out the distinct ide (CO2). In general, emissions result further with the onset of the strong roles and lifetimes of each individual from combustion of coal, oil, and nat- El Niño that appears to be emerging. greenhouse gas and type of warming ural gas (together, fossil fuels) to pro- Furthermore, the rate of sea level or cooling aerosol. Continuing to use vide energy and, somewhat less im- rise is accelerating due both to addi- the hundred-year Global Warming portantly, from clearing of land for tional melting of the Greenland and Potential (GWP-100) would be ob- agriculture, wood products, and com- Antarctic ice sheets and greater up- scuring potentially effective policy munities.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Acidification Due to Increasing Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide
    Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Policy document 12/05 June 2005 ISBN 0 85403 617 2 This report can be found at www.royalsoc.ac.uk ISBN 0 85403 617 2 © The Royal Society 2005 Requests to reproduce all or part of this document should be submitted to: Science Policy Section The Royal Society 6-9 Carlton House Terrace London SW1Y 5AG email [email protected] Copy edited and typeset by The Clyvedon Press Ltd, Cardiff, UK ii | June 2005 | The Royal Society Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Ocean acidification due to increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide Contents Page Summary vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Background to the report 1 1.2 The oceans and carbon dioxide: acidification 1 1.3 Acidification and the surface oceans 2 1.4 Ocean life and acidification 2 1.5 Interaction with the Earth systems 2 1.6 Adaptation to and mitigation of ocean acidification 2 1.7 Artificial deep ocean storage of carbon dioxide 3 1.8 Conduct of the study 3 2 Effects of atmospheric CO2 enhancement on ocean chemistry 5 2.1 Introduction 5 2.2 The impact of increasing CO2 on the chemistry of ocean waters 5 2.2.1 The oceans and the carbon cycle 5 2.2.2 The oceans and carbon dioxide 6 2.2.3 The oceans as a carbonate buffer 6 2.3 Natural variation in pH of the oceans 6 2.4 Factors affecting CO2 uptake by the oceans 7 2.5 How oceans have responded to changes in atmospheric CO2 in the past 7 2.6 Change in ocean chemistry due to increases in atmospheric CO2 from human activities 9 2.6.1 Change to the oceans
    [Show full text]
  • Accounting for the Missing Carbon-Sink with the C02
    ACCOUNTING FOR THE MISSING CARBON-SINK WITH THE I C02-FERTILIZATIONEFFECT HAROON S. KHESHGI Corporate Research Laboratories, Exxon Research and Engineering Company, Annandale, NJ 08801. U.S.A. ATUL K. JAIN and DONALD J. WLTEBBLES Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, U.S.A. Abstract. A terrestrial-biosphere carbon-sink has been included in global carbon-cycle models in order to reproduce past atmospheric CO2, I3cand I4cconcentrations. The sink is of large enough magnitude that its effect on projections of future C02 levels should not be ignored. However, the cause and mechanism of this sink are not well understood, contributing to uncertainty of projections. The estimated magnitude of the biospheric sink is examined with the aid of a global carbon-cycle model. For C02 emissions scenarios, model estimates are made of the resulting atmospheric CO2 concentration. Next, the response of this model to CO2-emission impulses is broken down to give the fractions of the impulse which reside in the atmosphere, oceans, and terrestrial biosphere - all as a perturbation to background atmospheric CO2 concentration time-profiles that correspond to different emission scenarios. For a biospheric sink driven by the CO2-fertilization effect, we find that the biospheric fraction reaches a maximum of roughly 30% about 50 years after the impulse, which is of the same size as the oceanic fraction at that time. The dependence of these results on emission scenario and the year of the impulse are reported. 1. Introduction Reconstruction of the global carbon cycle for the past 200 years balances emissions of C02 from fossil-fuel burning and land-use changes with the accumulation of 1 C02 in the atmosphere and the dissolution of C02 in the oceans.
    [Show full text]