A Geopolitical Earthquake Just Hit the Mideast the Israel-United Arab

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Geopolitical Earthquake Just Hit the Mideast the Israel-United Arab Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 5 5 Volume 20 , Number 3 4 Parshias Ki Savo September 5 , 20 20 A Geopolitical Earthquake Just Hit the Mideast By Thomas L. Friedman nytimes.com August 13, 2020 The Israel - United Arab Emirates deal will be felt Trump to block Bibi’s cherry - picking of the plan by taking throughout the region. annexation now. For once, I am going to agree with President Trump in This was causing Netanyahu to lose support from the his use of his favorite adjective: “huge.” settlers — and, at a time when he is on trial on corruption The agreement brokered by the Trump administration charges and facing daily protests outside his home over his for the United Arab Emirates to establish full poor performance in leading Israel out of the coronavirus normalization of re lations with Israel, in return for the epidemic, left him sinking in the p olls. Jewish state forgoing, for now, any annexation of the West So what Trump, Kushner, Prince Mohammed bin Bank, was exactly what Trump said it was in his tweet: a Zayed, the de facto leader of the Emirates, and Netanyahu “HUGE breakthrough.” did was turn lemons into lemonade, explained Itamar It is not Anwar el - Sadat going to Jerusalem — nothing Rabinovich, one of Israel’s leading Middle East historians could match that first big opening between Arabs and and a former ambassador to Washington . Israelis. It is not Yasir Arafat shaking Yitzhak Rabin’s hand “Instead of Israeli annexation for a Palestinian state, on the White House lawn — nothing could match that they made it Israeli non - annexation in return for peace first moment of public reconciliation between Israelis and with the U.A.E.,” said Rabinovich in an interview. Palestinians. Kushner, he added, “basically generated an asset out of But it is close. Just go down the scorecard , and you see nothing, which Israel could then tr ade for peace with the how this deal affects every major party in the region — U.A.E. It was peace for peace, not land for peace.” with those in the pro - American, pro - moderate Islam, pro - This process apparently started after the U.A.E.’s ending - the - conflict - with - Israel - once - and - for - all camp ambassador to Washington, Yousef al - Otaiba, published a benefiting the most and those in the radical pro - Iran, anti - letter in Hebrew in the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot American, pro - Is lamist permanent - struggle - with - Israel in June directly warning that Israeli annexation of the West camp all becoming more isolated and left behind. Bank would undermine the quiet progress Israel had made It’s a geopolitical earthquake. with the gulf Arabs. To fully appreciate why, you need to start with the The U.A.E. had been mulling going for more open internal dynamics of the deal. It was Trump’s peace plan diplomatic ties with Israel for a while, but it was the drawn up by Jared Kushner, a nd their willingness to stick discussions over how to stop an nexation that created a with it, that actually created the raw material for this framework where the U.A.E. could be seen as getting breakthrough. Here is how. something for the Palestinians in return for its The Kushner plan basically called for Israel and the normalization with Israel. Palestinians to make peace, with Israel being able to annex The Netanyahu dynamics here are fascinating, or as some 30 percent of the West B ank, where most of its Israeli writer Ari Shavit remarked to me: “Netanyahu is settlers were, and the Palestinians getting to establish a trying to get out of his own personal Watergate by going to demilitarized, patchwork state on the other 70 percent, China. He’s like Nixon in reverse.” along with some land swaps from Israel. What he meant was that Netanyahu had been doing The Palestinians rejected the deal outright as everything he could to appease the right - wing forces in unbalanced and unjust. But Isra eli Prime Minister Israel — with shiny objects like annexation — so they Benjamin Netanyahu, who basically helped to write the would side with him in his corruption trial against Israel’s very pro - Israel plan, said he intended to proceed with the court system and attorney general. annexation part of the plan by July 1 — without agreeing By taking this deal, Netanyahu, as Nixon did with to the part that his political base of Jewish settlers rejected: China, abandoned his natural ideological allies — the Pa lestinians later getting a state on the other 70 percent. (I settlers who supported him because they thought he woul d wonder if Trump’s ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, deliver annexation — “and this will force Netanyahu to a pro - settler extremist himself, encouraged Bibi to think he become more dependent on the center and center - right in could get away with this.) Israel going forward,” said Shavit. “This deal may help It didn’t work, because Kushner, who was hearing save Israeli democracy by now depriving Bibi” of the full re gularly from Egypt, Jordan and the gulf Arabs that such army of right - wing forces “he needed to destroy the Israeli a unilateral Israeli annexation would be a total deal - breaker Supreme Court.” for them, told Bibi, “Not so fast.” Kushner persuaded The Palestinian Authority, led by Mahmoud Abbas, was also stripped of something by this deal, which may Focus o n Israel Sept ember 5, 2020 Page 2 force him to the negotiating table. It stripped him of his us.” The vast damage Israel inflicted on Iran through biggest ace in the hole — the idea that the gu lf Arabs apparent cyberwarfare in recent months may have even would normalize with Israel only after the Israelis satisfied given the U.A.E. more breathing room to do t his deal. the demands of the Palestinian Authority with a state to its But there is another message, deeper, more liking. psychological. This was the U.A.E. telling the Iranians and (Free advice for Abbas: Come back to the table now all their proxies: There are really two coalitions in the and say you view the Trump plan as a “floor,” not a region today — those who want to let the future bury the “ceiling” for Palestinian aspirations. You will find a lot of past and those who want to l et the past keep burying the support from Trump, the Europeans and the Arabs for future. The U.A.E. is taking the helm of the first, and it is that position. You still have leverage. Israel still has to deal leaving Iran to be the leader of the second. with you, because your people in the West Bank are not When the Trump administration assassinated Qassim going to just disappear, no matter what happens with the Suleimani, the head of Iran’s Quds Force, the foreign - U.A.E. and Israel.) operations branc h of the Islamic Revolutionary Guards This deal will certainly encourage the other gulf Corps in January, I wrote a column saying that America sheikhdoms — Bahrain, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait and Saudi had just killed “the dumbest man in Iran.” Arabia — all of which have had covert and overt business Why? Because what was Suleimani’s business model, and intelligence dealings with Israel, to follow the which became Shiite Iran’s business model? It was to hire Em irates’ lead. They will not want to let the U.A.E. have a Arab and oth er Shiites to fight Arab Sunnis in Iraq, leg up in being able to marry its financial capital with Lebanon, Yemen and Syria — to project Iran’s power. Israel’s cybertechnology, agriculture technology and health And what was the result of all this? Iran has helped to turn care technology, with the potential to make both countries all four into failed states. Iran’s clerical leadership has stronger and more pros perous. become the largest facilitator of state fa ilure in the Middle Three other big winners here are: 1) King Abdullah of East — including its own — which is why so many Jordan. He feared that Israeli annexation would energize Lebanese blame it and Hezbollah for their country’s efforts to turn Jordan into the Palestinian state. That threat mismanagement that led to the devastating explosion last is for the moment defused. 2) The American Jewish week in Beirut’s port. community. If Israel had annexed part of the West Bank, it I have followed the Middle East for too long to ever would have divided every synagogue and Jewish wri te the sentence “the region will never be the same community in America, between hard - line annexationists again.” The forces of sectarianism, tribalism, corruption and liberal anti - annexationists. This was a looming disaster. and anti - pluralism run deep there. But there are other Gone for now. And 3) Joe Biden. Biden, if he succeeds currents — young men and women who are just so tired Trum p, will not have to worry about the thorny issue of of the old game, the old fights, the ol d wounds being annexation, and he should have a much stronger pro - stoked over and over again. You could see them American alliance in the region to work with. demonstrating all over the streets of Beirut last week The big geopolitical losers are Iran and all of its demanding good governance and a chance to realize their proxies: Hezbollah, the Iraqi militias, Syrian Presiden t full potential.
Recommended publications
  • August 2011 Postcard
    postcard_marchapril_2020.qxp_MARCH APRIL 2020 Postcard 1/29/20 10:06 AM Page 2 ¡ DEAR PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP: PLACE You have repeatedly boasted of your skills as a negotiator. If you were the You may wish leader of Palestine, would you view the recently released Israel-Palestine 35¢ “peace plan” as a serious overture? Of course not! Any negotiator would STAMP hastily dismiss a proposal that only reflects one side’s interests. How does HERE to send these this deal advance peace? It’s clear this proposal will not lead to a peace set- tlement and could only result in a worsening divide and more violence and injustice. What does the U.S. get out of this deal? Nothing but the promise of greater global distrust. This proposal cards to forgoes any sense of partiality and signals an almost complete acquiescence to Israeli desires. So much for putting “America First.” President TO: Donald Trump PRESIDENT DONALD TRUMP THE WHITE HOUSE 1600 PENNSYLVANIA AVE, NW and the WASHINGTON, DC 20500 Senator and ¡ Representative DEAR SENATOR: PLACE It’s painfully clear to objective observers that President Trump’s Israel- Palestine “peace plan” is simply a green light for Israel to do as it wishes. 35¢ in whose The plan embarrassingly forgoes any premise of U.S. impartiality and puts a STAMP blind rubber stamp on Israel’s desire to annex the West Bank and exert its HERE control over Palestinians. How does this deal advance peace? It’s clear this constituency proposal will not lead to a peace settlement and could only result in a worsening divide and more violence and injustice.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North the Role of the Arab States Africa Programme
    Briefing Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking January 2019 Middle East and North The Role of the Arab States Africa Programme Yossi Mekelberg Summary and Greg Shapland • The positions of several Arab states towards Israel have evolved greatly in the past 50 years. Four of these states in particular – Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and (to a lesser extent) Jordan – could be influential in shaping the course of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. • In addition to Egypt and Jordan (which have signed peace treaties with Israel), Saudi Arabia and the UAE, among other Gulf states, now have extensive – albeit discreet – dealings with Israel. • This evolution has created a new situation in the region, with these Arab states now having considerable potential influence over the Israelis and Palestinians. It also has implications for US positions and policy. So far, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the UAE and Jordan have chosen not to test what this influence could achieve. • One reason for the inactivity to date may be disenchantment with the Palestinians and their cause, including the inability of Palestinian leaders to unite to promote it. However, ignoring Palestinian concerns will not bring about a resolution of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict, which will continue to add to instability in the region. If Arab leaders see regional stability as being in their countries’ interests, they should be trying to shape any eventual peace plan advanced by the administration of US President Donald Trump in such a way that it forms a framework for negotiations that both Israeli and Palestinian leaderships can accept. Israeli–Palestinian Peacemaking: The Role of the Arab States Introduction This briefing forms part of the Chatham House project, ‘Israel–Palestine: Beyond the Stalemate’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and Their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Honors Theses Lee Honors College 4-25-2018 The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli-Palestinian Peace Efforts Daniel Bucksbaum Western Michigan University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses Part of the Comparative Politics Commons, International Relations Commons, and the Other Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Bucksbaum, Daniel, "The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts" (2018). Honors Theses. 3009. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/honors_theses/3009 This Honors Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Lee Honors College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Changing Geopolitical Dynamics of the Middle East and their Impact on Israeli- Palestinian Peace Efforts By Daniel Bucksbaum A thesis submitted to the Lee Honors College Western Michigan University April 2018 Thesis Committee: Jim Butterfield, Ph.D., Chair Yuan-Kang Wang, Ph.D. Mustafa Mughazy, Ph.D. Bucksbaum 1 Table of Contents I. Abstract……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 II. Source Material……………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 III. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….4 IV. Historical Context for the Two-State Solution………………………………………………………...6 a. Deeply Rooted and Ideological Claims to the Land……………………………………………….…..7 b. Legacy of the Oslo Accords……………………………………………………………………………………….9 c. Israeli Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution is Unfeasible……………………………………19 d. Palestinian Narrative: Why the Two-State Solution has become unattainable………..22 e. Drop in Support for the Two-State Solution; Negotiations entirely…………………………27 f.
    [Show full text]
  • The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options
    ISSUE BRIEF 08.25.20 The Gulf States and the Middle East Peace Process: Considerations, Stakes, and Options Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, Ph.D, Fellow for the Middle East conflict, the Gulf states complied with and INTRODUCTION enforced the Arab League boycott of Israel This issue brief examines where the six until at least 1994 and participated in the nations of the Gulf Cooperation Council— oil embargo of countries that supported 1 Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Israel in the Yom Kippur War of 1973. In Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates 1973, for example, the president of the (UAE)—currently stand in their outlook and UAE, Sheikh Zayed bin Sultan Al Nahyan, approaches toward the Israeli-Palestinian claimed that “No Arab country is safe from issue. The first section of this brief begins by the perils of the battle with Zionism unless outlining how positions among the six Gulf it plays its role and bears its responsibilities, 2 states have evolved over the three decades in confronting the Israeli enemy.” In since the Madrid Conference of 1991. Section Kuwait, Sheikh Fahd al-Ahmad Al Sabah, a two analyzes the degree to which the six brother of two future Emirs, was wounded Gulf states’ relations with Israel are based while fighting with Fatah in Jordan in 3 on interests, values, or a combination of 1968, while in 1981 the Saudi government both, and how these differ from state to offered to finance the reconstruction of state. Section three details the Gulf states’ Iraq’s Osirak nuclear reactor after it was 4 responses to the peace plan unveiled by destroyed by an Israeli airstrike.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief
    Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief Updated May 18, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44245 SUMMARY R44245 Israel: Background and U.S. Relations in Brief May 18, 2020 The following matters are of particular significance to U.S.-Israel relations. Jim Zanotti Israeli unity government, possible West Bank annexation, and COVID-19. In May Specialist in Middle 2020, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his main political rival Benny Eastern Affairs Gantz formed a unity government, bringing an end to a long political stalemate in Israel that had continued through three elections in April 2019, September 2019, and March 2020. Netanyahu and Gantz cited the COVID-19 pandemic and the need to address its public health, economic, and other implications for Israel as a major reason for their agreement. By accepting a unity government, Gantz departed from his campaign pledge not to join with Netanyahu, who is scheduled to begin a criminal trial on corruption charges on May 24. While the agreement provides for Gantz to rotate into the position of prime minister by November 2021, and appears to give him broad powers of approval over the government’s actions, his choice to join Netanyahu split his Kahol Lavan party and might leave Netanyahu with an overall political advantage. Arguably, the most significant aspect of the Netanyahu-Gantz deal for U.S. policy is its explicit authorization of a cabinet and Knesset vote on annexing West Bank territory—in coordination with the United States—after July 1, 2020 (see more on the issue’s significance below).
    [Show full text]
  • From Israel's Perspective, Joe Biden Is As Good As It Gets—For A
    Selected articles concerning Israel, published weekly by Suburban Orthodox Toras Chaim’s (Baltimore) Israel Action Committee Edited by Jerry Appelbaum ( [email protected] ) | Founding editor: Sheldon J. Berman Z”L Issue 8 5 2 Volume 20 , Number 3 1 Parshias Re'eh | Shabbos Mevarchim August 15 , 20 20 From Israel’s Perspective, Joe Biden Is as Good as It Gets — for a Democrat By Shmuel Rosner nytimes.com August 9, 2020 And any vice - presidential pick is better than Susan election because we fear losing President Trump. For Rice. many reasons, he is seen by Israelis as one of the In the pile of old notebooks I saved from when I was friendliest leaders in the history of the United States - Israel covering American politics for an Israeli newspaper (and alliance. Israel is one of few countries in the world in when reporters still used a pad and pen), I found five which the pr esident is highly popular: A whopping 56 mentions of Joe Biden’s Israel story. percent of Israelis prefer Mr. Trump in the upcoming Most of them are from 2008 — first during the election, compared to 16 percent who support Mr. Biden. Democratic primary, when Mr. Biden was running against As far as Israelis are concerned, Mr. Biden has two Barack Obama, and then the general election, when Mr. disadvantages. He is not Mr. Trump, and he is a Biden was running alongside Mr. Obama. I was cover ing Democr at. In other words, he is not the candidate they that election for the Tel Aviv - based Haaretz, and every support and he comes from the party many of them mention of Israel was of interest to me.
    [Show full text]
  • Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation
    Middle East Centre JUST BELOW THE SURFACE ISRAEL, THE ARAB GULF STATES AND THE LIMITS OF COOPERATION IAN BLACK LSE Middle East Centre Report | March 2019 About the Middle East Centre The Middle East Centre builds on LSE’s long engagement with the Middle East and provides a central hub for the wide range of research on the region carried out at LSE. The Middle East Centre aims to enhance understanding and develop rigorous research on the societies, economies, polities and international relations of the region. The Centre promotes both special- ised knowledge and public understanding of this crucial area, and has outstanding strengths in interdisciplinary research and in regional expertise. As one of the world’s leading social science institutions, LSE comprises departments covering all branches of the social sciences. The Middle East Centre harnesses this expertise to promote innova- tive research and training on the region. Middle East Centre Just Below the Surface: Israel, the Arab Gulf States and the Limits of Cooperation Ian Black LSE Middle East Centre Report March 2019 About the Author Ian Black is a former Middle East editor, diplomatic editor and European editor for the Guardian newspaper. He is currently Visiting Senior Fellow at the LSE Middle East Centre. His latest book is entitled Enemies and Neighbours: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917–2017. Abstract For over a decade Israel has been strengthening links with Arab Gulf states with which it has no diplomatic relations. Evidence of a convergence of Israel’s stra- tegic views with those of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and Bahrain has accumulated as all displayed hostility to Iran’s regional ambitions and to United States President Barack Obama’s policies during the Arab Spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked
    Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Updated July 14, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46433 SUMMARY R46433 Israel’s Possible Annexation of West Bank July 14, 2020 Areas: Frequently Asked Questions Jim Zanotti Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has stated his intent for Israel to annex parts Specialist in Middle of the West Bank in 2020. Annexation could raise issues for Congress, and varying Eastern Affairs congressional views on the subject have contributed to debate about implications for U.S.-Israel relations. Congress may conduct additional oversight of Trump Administration actions and could modify or place conditions on U.S. funding for Israel, the Palestinians, and various international organizations. While the West Bank has been under Israeli military administration since its capture from Jordan in the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, its status has been different from Israel proper (the territory Israel controlled before the war). Israel’s government has a mandate—based on the May 2020 power-sharing agreement between Netanyahu and Defense Minister Benny Gantz—to bring the matter of annexation to a cabinet and/or Knesset vote as early as July 1, 2020, provided that it is done in coordination with the United States. Palestinian leaders strongly oppose annexation, partly because it could undermine their hopes for a viable Palestinian state with territorial contiguity. Israeli annexation could thus have significant consequences for future U.S. efforts to secure a negotiated Israeli- Palestinian peace. In addition to the specific territorial and administrative impact of annexation, it could more broadly affect Palestinian national aspirations and the future of the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank and Gaza, Israel’s efforts to reconcile its actions with its self-proclaimed identity as both a Jewish and a democratic state, and Israeli and Palestinian security concerns.
    [Show full text]
  • The Trump Peace Plan: Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible
    1 COVER PAGE 2 THE BEGIN-SADAT CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES BAR-ILAN UNIVERSITY Mideast Security and Policy Studies No. 175 The Trump Peace Plan: Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible Douglas J. Feith and Lewis Libby 3 The Trump Peace Plan—Aiming Not to Make a Deal, but to Make a Deal Possible Douglas J. Feith and Lewis Libby © The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies Bar-Ilan University Ramat Gan 5290002 Israel Tel: 972-3-5318959 [email protected] www.besacenter.org ISSN 0793-1042 July 2020 Cover image: President Donald Trump unveils his peace plan for Israel and the Palestinians, Official White House Photo by Shealah Craighead 4 The Begin-Sadat (BESA) Center for Strategic Studies The Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies is an independent, non-partisan think tank conducting policy-relevant research on Middle Eastern and global strategic affairs, particularly as they relate to the national security and foreign policy of Israel and regional peace and stability. It is named in memory of Menachem Begin and Anwar Sadat, whose efforts in pursuing peace laid the cornerstone for conflict resolution in the Middle East. BESA Perspectives are short pieces on timely and fundamental Israeli, Middle Eastern, and global issues. Mideast Security and Policy Studies serve as a forum for publication or re- publication of research conducted by BESA associates. Colloquia on Strategy and Diplomacy summarize the papers delivered at conferences and seminars held by the Center for the academic, military, official, and general publics. In sponsoring these discussions, the BESA Center aims to stimulate public debate on, and consideration of, contending approaches to problems of peace and war in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S
    Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S. Policy Kenneth Katzman Specialist in Middle Eastern Affairs Updated February 24, 2020 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov 95-1013 Bahrain: Unrest, Security, and U.S. Policy Summary A 2011 uprising by a mostly Shia opposition to the Sunni-minority-led regime of Bahrain’s Al Khalifa ruling family has subsided, but punishments of oppositionists and periodic demonstrations continue. The uprising did not achieve its goal of establishing a constitutional monarchy, but the unrest compelled the ruling family to undertake some modest reforms. Elections for the lower house of a legislative body, last held in 2018, were marred by the banning of opposition political societies and allegations of gerrymandering. The mainstream opposition uses peaceful forms of dissent, but small factions, reportedly backed by Iran, have conducted some attacks on security officials. The government’s repression presents a policy dilemma for the United States because Bahrain is a longtime ally that is pivotal to maintaining Persian Gulf security. The country has hosted a U.S. naval command headquarters for the Gulf region since 1948; the United States and Bahrain have had a formal Defense Cooperation Agreement (DCA) since 1991; and Bahrain is designated by the United States as a “major non-NATO ally.” There are nearly 5,000 U.S. forces, mostly Navy, in Bahrain, which relies on U.S.-made arms. Because of the government’s use of force against protesters, both the Obama and Trump Administrations curtailed U.S. assistance to Bahrain’s internal security organizations. The Trump Administration has prioritized countering Iran and addressing other regional security issues, and to that end has lifted the previous Administration’s conditionality on major arms sales to Bahrain’s military and has corroborated Bahrain leadership assertions that Iran is providing material support to violent opposition factions in Bahrain.
    [Show full text]
  • President Trump Peace Strategy: Emerging Conflict Between Israel and Palestine
    International Affairs and Global Strategy www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-574X (Paper) ISSN 2224-8951 (Online) Vol.82, 2020 President Trump Peace Strategy: Emerging Conflict Between Israel and Palestine Jibrin Ubale Yahaya, PhD Department of Political Science, National Open University of Nigeria (NOUN), Jabi Abuja Abstract When Donald Trump was elected as US President in November 2016, he initially signaled some real hope for the peaceful resolution of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Some analysts argued that he may actually manage to deliver what he calls "the deal of the century" and bring peace to Israel and Palestine. These assumptions were based on the fact that President Trump is the type of person that could wake up one morning, say "enough", and pressure Israeli and Palestinian leaders to sign a peace deal on his terms. Early on in his presidency, Trump made the conflict a strategic priority and unconventionally chose to go to the Middle East (Saudi Arabia, Israel and Palestine) on his first trip abroad as President. During a press conference with Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas in Bethlehem, he said that "if Israel and the Palestinians can make peace, it will begin a process of peace all throughout the Middle East." This was in line with Europe's standard inside-out approach (Israeli-Palestinian peace first, Israeli-Arab normalization later). But on December 2019, Trump made it clear that his much-anticipated peace deal will favour Israel when he recognized Jerusalem as Israel's capital and promised to move the US embassy there. This led Abbas to brand Trump's peace efforts as "the slap of the century" and say the US could no longer play any role in the Middle East peace process following the move.
    [Show full text]
  • Twostates Or One?
    How AMLO could ruin Mexico Did covid come from a lab? Belarus: pirate and pariah The capex bonanza MAY 29TH–JUNE 4TH 2021 Two states or one? The hopeless peace process Contents The Economist May 29th 2021 5 The world this week Britain 7 A summary of political 21 The bbc’s problems and business news 22 An Australian trade deal An adviser speaks Leaders 23 The hush in the City 9 Israel and Palestine 23 Two states or one? 24 Class and nature writing 10 Corporate investment 26 Zoom justice Innovation nations 26 A surge in banknotes 10 The euro zone 28 Bagehot Mr Levelling Up Take one for the team 11 Ventilation Europe Fresh thinking about 29 Belarus hijacks a plane fresh air On the cover 30 Russia’s Czech problem 12 Mexico 31 A Turkish mobster takes The Israeli-Palestinian peace The false messiah on the government process has become an obstacle to progress: leader, Letters 31 Norwegian folk music page 9. The ideal of two states 14 On digital currencies, 32 Parisian voters has failed. It has left the Holy technology and China, 34 Charlemagne How Land looking like one unequal Wyoming, ice hockey farmers still rule Europe state, page 44 Briefing United States How amlo could ruin Mexico 17 Mexico’s populist Andrés Manuel López Obrador 35 Texas moves righter president pursues bad policies by 36 The George Floyd Act The unnoticed radical improper means: leader, page 12. 37 Central America Elections on June 6th will 37 Infrastructure year determine how deeply—and ruinously—he can transform his 38 Wildlife wars country: briefing, page 17 39 New York’s new island 40 Lexington The Kamala Did covid-19 come from a lab? dilemma How can the world prepare for a future pandemic when it does The Americas not know where this one came Patronage in Brazil from? Page 57.
    [Show full text]