DOCSLIB.ORG

A Dying Practice RIGHTS Use of Cluster Munitions by Russia and Georgia in August 2008 WATCH

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Dying Practice RIGHTS Use of Cluster Munitions by Russia and Georgia in August 2008 WATCH Georgia HUMAN A Dying Practice RIGHTS Use of Cluster Munitions by Russia and Georgia in August 2008 WATCH A Dying Practice Use of Cluster Munitions by Russia and Georgia in August 2008 Copyright © 2009 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-56432-469-9 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch 350 Fifth Avenue, 34th floor New York, NY 10118-3299 USA Tel: +1 212 290 4700, Fax: +1 212 736 1300 [email protected] Poststraße 4-5 10178 Berlin, Germany Tel: +49 30 2593 06-10, Fax: +49 30 2593 0629 [email protected] Avenue des Gaulois, 7 1040 Brussels, Belgium Tel: + 32 (2) 732 2009, Fax: + 32 (2) 732 0471 [email protected] 64-66 Rue de Lausanne 1202 Geneva, Switzerland Tel: +41 22 738 0481, Fax: +41 22 738 1791 [email protected] 2-12 Pentonville Road, 2nd Floor London N1 9HF, UK Tel: +44 20 7713 1995, Fax: +44 20 7713 1800 [email protected] 27 Rue de Lisbonne 75008 Paris, France Tel: +33 (1)43 59 55 35, Fax: +33 (1) 43 59 55 22 [email protected] 1630 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 500 Washington, DC 20009 USA Tel: +1 202 612 4321, Fax: +1 202 612 4333 [email protected] Web Site Address: http://www.hrw.org April 2009 1-56432-469-9 A Dying Practice Use of Cluster Munitions by Russia and Georgia in August 2008 Acronyms ........................................................................................................................................... i Summary ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 6 Recommendations ...................................................................................................................... 8 To the Government of Russia ................................................................................................ 8 To the Government of Georgia .............................................................................................. 9 To All Governments ............................................................................................................. 10 Technical and Legal Background on Cluster Munitions ..................................................................... 11 Cluster Munitions and their Humanitarian Effects ....................................................................... 12 Existing International Humanitarian Law .................................................................................... 13 The Principle of Distinction .................................................................................................. 13 Feasible Precautions ........................................................................................................... 14 International Humanitarian Law Applied to Cluster Munitions .................................................... 14 Indiscriminate Use of Cluster Munitions .............................................................................. 14 Disproportionate Use of Cluster Munitions .......................................................................... 15 The Requirement to Take Precautions .................................................................................. 16 Protocol V on Explosive Remnants of War ................................................................................... 16 The Convention on Cluster Munitions ......................................................................................... 17 Key Provisions of the Convention on Cluster Munitions ........................................................ 17 The Importance of Joining the Convention on Cluster Munitions ........................................... 18 The Belligerents and the Cluster Munitions Used ............................................................................ 20 Use, Production, Transfer, and Stockpiling ................................................................................ 20 Russia ................................................................................................................................. 21 Georgia ............................................................................................................................... 23 Cluster Munitions Used in Georgia and their Submunitions ........................................................ 24 AO-2.5 RTM Submunition .................................................................................................... 24 9N210 Submunition ............................................................................................................ 25 Iskander Missile .................................................................................................................. 25 M85 Submunition ............................................................................................................... 25 Use of Cluster Munitions by Russia .................................................................................................. 40 Civilian Casualties at the Time of Attack ..................................................................................... 41 Gori City .............................................................................................................................. 41 Ruisi ................................................................................................................................... 43 Variani ................................................................................................................................ 47 Other Strikes ............................................................................................................................. 50 Socioeconomic Harm ................................................................................................................. 52 Russian Statements about Cluster Munitions ............................................................................. 52 Legal Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 54 Use of Cluster Munitions by Georgia ................................................................................................ 56 Civilian Casualties at the Time of Attack ..................................................................................... 57 Shindisi .............................................................................................................................. 58 Tirdznisi .............................................................................................................................. 58 Civilian Casualties from Submunition Duds ................................................................................ 59 Brotsleti .............................................................................................................................. 59 Pkhvenisi ............................................................................................................................ 61 Shindisi .............................................................................................................................. 61 Ditsi ................................................................................................................................... 62 Socioeconomic Harm ................................................................................................................ 62 Georgian Statements about Cluster Munitions ........................................................................... 63 Initial Condemnation .......................................................................................................... 64 Acknowledgment of Use ..................................................................................................... 64 Confusion and Investigation ................................................................................................ 65 Legal Analysis ............................................................................................................................ 67 Clearance and Risk Education ......................................................................................................... 69 Russian Military ........................................................................................................................ 69 Georgian Military ....................................................................................................................... 70 NGO Clearance .......................................................................................................................... 72 Community Clearance ................................................................................................................ 74 Challenges ................................................................................................................................ 75 Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 75 Resource Shortages ............................................................................................................ 76 Environmental Factors ......................................................................................................... 76 Complications from Civilians ..............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pax Christi Colombia Best Practice Study
    THE CLUSTER MUNITION COALITION 2003-2009 Georg Frerks IKV PAX CHRISTI BEST PRACTICE STUDY NO. 4 November 2009 2 INDEX INDEX ........................................................................................................................................ 3 ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 5 NOTE ......................................................................................................................................... 5 ABOUT THE AUTHOR ........................................................................................................... 6 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 7 Goals of best practice studies ................................................................................................ 7 Lobby and advocacy campaigns by IKV Pax Christi ............................................................. 7 The selection of CMC as the object of a best practice study and research questions ......... 8 Definitions of advocacy and lobby ......................................................................................... 8 Evaluating advocacy and lobby ............................................................................................. 9 Lessons learned from the ICBL ........................................................................................... 10 Evaluative framework ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 DG Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity
    CI-18/COUNCIL-31/6/REV 2 2018 DG Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity INTRODUCTION This report is submitted to the Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication (IPDC) in line with the Decision on the Safety of Journalists and the issue of Impunity adopted by the Council at its 26th session on 27 March 2008, and renewed at subsequent sessions in 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2016. In its latest Decision, adopted in November 2016, the IPDC Council urged Member States to “continue to inform the Director-General of UNESCO, on a voluntary basis, on the status of the judicial inquiries conducted on each of the killings condemned by the Director-General”. The present report provides an analysis of the cases of killings of journalists and associated media personnel that were condemned by the Director-General in 2016 and 2017. It also takes stock of the status of judicial enquiries conducted on each of the killings recorded by UNESCO between 2006 and 2017, based on information provided by Member States. TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 2 2. Background and Context 2 3. Journalists’ killings in 2016 and 2017: key findings 7 3.1 Most dangerous regions 8 3.2 Rise in number of women journalists among fatalities 9 3.3 Highest number of killings among TV journalists 11 3.4 Majority of victims are local journalists 11 3.5 Freelance and staff journalists 12 3.6 More killings occurring in countries with no armed conflict 12 4. Member States’ responses: status of the judicial enquiries on cases of journalists killed from 2006 to end 2017 13 4.1 Decrease in Member State response rate to Director-General’s request 18 4.2 Slight reduction in impunity rate, but 89% of cases remain unresolved 19 4.3 Member States reporting on measures to promote safety of journalists and to combat impunity 22 5.
    [Show full text]
  • 736Th PLENARY MEETING of the COUNCIL
    PC.JOUR/736 Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe 23 October 2008 Permanent Council Original: ENGLISH Chairmanship: Finland 736th PLENARY MEETING OF THE COUNCIL 1. Date: Thursday, 23 October 2008 Opened: 10.05 a.m. Closed: 12.20 p.m. 2. Chairperson: Mr. A. Turunen Prior to taking up the agenda, the Chairperson informed the Permanent Council that the Chairman-in-Office, in a letter issued on 22 October 2008 (see annex 1 to this journal), had announced the adoption, through a silence procedure, of the Ministerial Council decision on the periods of service of the OSCE Secretary General (see MC.DEC/3/08, the text of which is appended to this journal). The Russian Federation welcomed the adoption of the decision (PC.DEL/882/08 OSCE+). 3. Subjects discussed — Statements — Decisions/documents adopted: Agenda item 1: OSCE MISSION TO MOLDOVA Chairperson, Head of the OSCE Mission to Moldova (PC.FR/22/08 OSCE+), France-European Union (with the candidate countries Croatia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey; the countries of the Stabilisation and Association Process and potential candidate countries Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia; the European Free Trade Association countries Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway, members of the European Economic Area; as well as Georgia, in alignment) (PC.DEL/864/08), Russian Federation (PC.DEL/878/08 OSCE+), United States of America (PC.DEL/871/08), Ukraine (PC.DEL/877/08 OSCE+), Moldova (PC.DEL/870/08/Rev.1) Agenda item 2: REVIEW OF CURRENT ISSUES (a) Presidential
    [Show full text]
  • English, French and Russian, the Media Self-Regulation Guidebook Was Launched at the Eurasia Regional Forum for Media Development Held in Paris on 17–19 April 2008
    Yearbook 2008 Yearbook 10 2008 THE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA THE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA www.osce.org/fom THE REPRESENTATIVE ON FREEDOM OF THE MEDIA The Representative on Organization for Security and Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe ISBN 978-92-9234-627-0 Co-operation in Europe Freedom of the Media The views expressed by the contributing authors in this publication are their own and do not necessarily reflect the views of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media. © 2009 The Representative on Freedom of the Media Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) Wallnerstrasse 6 A-1010 Vienna, Austria tel +43-1-512 21 45-0 fax +43-1-512 21 45-9 e-mail [email protected] www.osce.org/fom Design & Layout: Phoenix Design Aid, Denmark ISBN 978-92-9234-627-0 Yearbook 10 2008 The OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Vienna 2009 contents Contents 11 Preface by Alexander Stubb 15 Foreword by Miklos Haraszti Contributions 19 Greeting on the occasion of the 20th anniversary of ARTICLE 19 Miklos Haraszti 23 The Success Story of the Media Self-Regulation Guidebook Adeline Hulin 29 When confrontation ends and co-operation begins. The media and the government Zoya Kazanzhy Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media 35 Decision No. 193: Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media 43 Decision No. 1/07: Extension of the Mandate of the OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media Declarations 47 Joint Declaration by the four Global Rapporteurs on Freedom of
    [Show full text]
  • The Legality of the Cluster Munitions' Use in and Near Populated
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives The legality of the cluster munitions’ use in and near populated areas during the 5 - days war between Russia and Georgia in 2008 Candidate number: 8015 Submission deadline: 15 May 2013 Number of words: 17896 Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................... 4 Background ................................................................................................................. 4 Research question ...................................................................................................... 5 Structure of the thesis ................................................................................................ 5 Sources and method ................................................................................................... 5 Chapter 1 The law that regulates the conduct of hostilities .................................... 7 1.1 Principle of military necessity ............................................................................ 7 1.2 Principle of humanity .......................................................................................... 9 1.3 Principle of distinction ...................................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Civilians versus combatants ................................................................................... 11 1.3.2 Civilian
    [Show full text]
  • The Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity
    CI-14/CONF.202/4 Rev2 PARIS, 2014 Original: English THE SAFETY OF JOURNALISTS AND THE DANGER OF IMPUNITY REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COUNCIL OF THE IPDC (TWENTY-NINTH SESSION) INTRODUCTION This document is submitted to the Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication’s (IPDC) in accordance with its Decision on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity at its 28th Session (22-23 March 2012). The report first provides background information on UNESCO’s work in this area. It then covers developments over 2012 and 2013 since the previous report to the IPDC Council, and it provides a cumulative update of the 593 killings of journalists between 1 January 2006 and 31 December 2013 for which UNESCO’s Director-GeneraI requested respective Member States to voluntarily submit information on judicial follow-up. A number of annexes provide background information. Communication and Information Sector TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary 2. Background and Context A. UNESCO Mandate on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity B. Selected UNESCO activities on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity C. UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity D. UNESCO Work Plan on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity E. UNESCO World Trends Report on Freedom of Expression and Media Development 3. Analysis of Killings of Journalists in 2012 and 2013 4. Overall Analysis of Killings of Journalists from 2006 to 2013 5. Member States’ Responses: Methodology for this Report on the Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Safety of Journalists and the Danger of Impunity
    CI-16/COUNCIL-30/4 Rev. PARIS, 7 October 2016 Original: English THE SAFETY OF JOURNALISTS AND THE DANGER OF IMPUNITY REPORT BY THE DIRECTOR-GENERAL TO THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL COUNCIL OF THE IPDC (THIRTIETH SESSION) INTRODUCTION This document is submitted to the Intergovernmental Council of the International Programme for the Development of Communication’s (IPDC) in accordance with its Decision on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity adopted at its 26th session (27 March 2008) and renewed at subsequent sessions in 2010, 2012, and 2014. The latest Decision from 2014 reiterated “the continuing relevance of [previous] IPDC Decisions that request the Director-General of UNESCO to provide to the Intergovernmental Council of the IPDC, on a two-year basis at its biennial session, an analytical report on the Director- General’s condemnations of the killings of journalists, media workers and social media producers who are engaged in journalistic activities and who are killed or targeted in their line of duty”. The present report offers an overview of the killings of journalists condemned by the Director-General in 2014-2015 as well as providing an analysis of the killings condemned over the last 10 years, between 2006 and 2015. It presents an update on the status of investigations into these killings based on the information provided by Member States. Background information is also provided on the latest developments in the implementation of the UN Plan of Action on the Safety of Journalists and the Issue of Impunity and on UNESCO’s specific contribution to this process. Communication and Information Sector 2 Communication and Information Sector TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Expectations and Realities of Brain Drain from Georgia
    The 6th International Days of Statistics and Economics, Prague, September 13-15, 2012 EXPECTATIONS AND REALITIES OF BRAIN DRAIN FROM GEORGIA Zurab Laliashvili Abstract The purpose of the project was to determine an overall positive and negative consequence of brain drain from Georgia. It is well known, that phenomenon of brain drain effects, as countries of origin, so countries of destination. But in this thesis I would like to hold your attention on the expectations of government in sender countries from population brain drain process and anticipation of qualified labor forces in emigration. In my research I have studied programs and projects held and supported by government of Georgia in migration management. I also surveyed Georgian emigrants in Czech Republic and potential emigrants in Georgia. The survey showed me various expectations of qualified emigrants and level of their main emigration aim fulfillment. After analyzing the survey results I was able to determine inadequacy in government and emigrants activities on the way of realizing their anticipations. In conclusion I generated some important recommendations for Georgian government for constructive approaches in optimization of qualified labor resource migration management. Key words: migration, brain drain, management, Georgia. JEL Code: J01, J20, J40, J60 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dictionary of Terms: Brain drain- is the large-scale emigration of high skilled individuals. Brain gain- is an opposite situation, in which many trained and talented individuals seek entrance into a country. Brain lose- is emigration of skilled workers, without a hope of their return to their homeland. Brain circulation- if migrants regularly or occasionally return to their countries to share the benefits arising from the skills and knowhow they have gained during their stay and work abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • The Russian Operational-Tactical
    MAANPUOLUSTUSKORKEAKOULU STRATEGIAN LAITOS JULKAISUSARJA 4: TYÖPAPEREITA No 42 NATIONAL DEFENCE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF STRATEGIC AND DEFENCE STUDIES SERIES 4: WORKING PAPERS No 42 THE RUSSIAN OPERATIONAL- TACTICAL ISKANDER MISSILE SYSTEM STEFAN FORSS MAANPUOLUSTUSKORKEAKOULU Strategian laitos HELSINKI 2012 Stefan Forss: The Russian Operational-Tactical Iskander Missile System Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu, Strategian laitos Julkaisusarja 4: työpapereita No 42 National Defence University, Department of Strategic and Defence Studies Series 4: Working Papers No 42 Uusimmat julkaisut pdf-muodossa: http://www.mpkk.fi/ Kannen kuva: Janne Kopu ISSN 1236-4983 Maanpuolustuskorkeakoulu – National Defence University Strategian laitos – Department of Strategic and Defence Studies Juvenes Print Tampere 2012 THE RUSSIAN OPERATIONAL-TACTICAL ISKANDER MISSILE SYSTEM Stefan Forss Land- and sea-based long-range ballistic nuclear missiles and air-launched cruise missiles play a central role in upholding Russia's strategic nuclear deterrent. So- called intermediate-range missiles were banned and eliminated as a result of the INF Treaty between the United States and the Soviet Union, signed in December 1987. Short- and intermediate-range ballistic missiles have, since then, been taken into widespread use in several nation-states, not least in states neighbouring Rus- sia. The Iskander missile system is a logical response to this development. The INF Treaty1 did not cover short-range also tested in combat, during the August tactical ballistic missiles or short-range 2008 Russo-Georgian War. The deploy- land-based cruise missiles. The importance ment of these missiles to Luga, in the West- of these weapons, considerably lighter than ern Military District, neighbouring Estonia strategic weapons, in military defence is and Finland, raises questions of a possible high both in conventional and nuclear roles.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in July and August 2006
    Lebanon HUMAN Flooding South Lebanon RIGHTS Israel’s Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon WATCH in July and August 2006 February 2008 Volume 20, No. 2(E) Flooding South Lebanon Israel’s Use of Cluster Munitions in Lebanon in July and August 2006 Acronyms..................................................................................................................i Map of Lebanon .......................................................................................................ii Summary ................................................................................................................. 1 Methodology..................................................................................................... 14 Recommendations............................................................................................16 To the Government of Israel .........................................................................16 To the Secretary-General of the United Nations ............................................ 17 To the Government of the United States....................................................... 17 To all governments ...................................................................................... 17 Cluster Munitions and International Humanitarian Law.......................................... 19 Background on Cluster Munitions .....................................................................19 International Humanitarian Law ........................................................................ 21 International
    [Show full text]
  • Cluster Munition Monitor 2018
    CLUSTER MUNITION MONITOR 2018 Monitoring and Research Committee, ICBL-CMC Governance Board Danish Demining Group Human Rights Watch Humanity & Inclusion (HI) Mines Action Canada Research team leaders ICBL-CMC staff experts © August 2018 by International Campaign to Ban Landmines – Cluster Munition Coalition (ICBL-CMC). All rights reserved. ISBN: 978-2-9701146-3-5 Front cover photograph © Sean Sutton/MAG, March 2017 Back cover photographs © Sean Sutton/MAG, March 2017 and Blaise Kormann/HI, July 2017 Cover, text design, and layout by Lixar I.T. Inc. Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor provides research and monitoring for the Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) and the International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) and is a formal program of the ICBL-CMC. For more information visit www.the-monitor.org or email [email protected]. Landmine and Cluster Munition Monitor makes an effort to limit the environmental footprint of reports by publishing all of our research reports online. This report is available online. Detailed country profiles are available online at www.the-monitor.org/cp CLUSTER MUNITION COALITION The Cluster Munition Coalition (CMC) is an international civil society campaign working to eradicate cluster munitions and prevent further harm from these weapons. The CMC works through its members to change the policy and practice of governments and organizations and to raise awareness of the devastation that cluster munitions cause The CMC is committed to the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions as the best framework for ending the use, production, stockpiling, and transfer of cluster munitions and for destroying stockpiles, clearing contaminated areas, and assisting affected communities.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Argument for a Cluster Munitions Convention
    The Time Is Now: A Historical Argument for a Cluster Munitions Convention Bonnie Docherty* I. INTRODUCTION While traveling through Italy in June 1859, Swiss businessman Henri Dunant happened upon the aftermath of the Battle of Solferino. He found "despair unspeakable and misery of every kind."' Mangled bodies, dead and alive, littered the field, and the cries of the wounded filled the air. "The poor wounded men . were ghastly pale and exhausted," he wrote, describing the scene: Some, who had been the most badly hurt, had a stupefied look as though they could not grasp what was said to them .... Others were anxious and excited by nervous strain and shaken by spas- modic trembling. Some, who had gaping wounds already begin- 2 ning to show infection, were almost crazed with suffering. Dunant's recollections, A Memory of Solferino (1862), became a catalyst for the first modern instrument of international humanitarian law CIHL"), the 1864 Geneva Convention.' This treaty provided protection for the wounded on the battlefield, and it also showed that nations had the legal power to ameliorate suffering in war. The first Geneva Convention in turn spawned a branch of IHL that seeks to minimize war's effects by controlling the weap- ons used. Since the late nineteenth century, the international community has regu- lated or banned weapons it found caused undue harm to soldiers or civil- ians. Some of these treaties are out of date. For example, an 1899 Hague Declaration prohibiting bombs dropped from balloons seems archaic in the * Clinical Instructor, Human Rights Program, Harvard Law School; researcher, Arms Division, Human Rights Watch.
    [Show full text]