DOCSLIB.ORG

ACE/Wind Multispacecraft Analysis of the Magnetic Correlation in the Solar Wind

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACE/Wind Multispacecraft Analysis of the Magnetic Correlation in the Solar Wind Proceedings of the 30th International Cosmic Ray Conference ID 937 Rogelio Caballero, Juan Carlos D’Olivo, Gustavo Medina-Tanco, Lukas Nellen, Federico A. Sánchez, José F. Valdés-Galicia (eds.) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico, 2008 Vol. 1 (SH), pages 625–628 30TH INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE ACE/Wind multispacecraft analysis of the magnetic correlation in the solar wind 1 2 3 2 2 4 S. DASSO , W.H. MATTHAEUS , J.M. WEYGAND , P. CHUYCHAI , L.J. MILANO , C.W. SMITH , 3 M.G. KIVELSON 1Instituto de Astronom´ıayF´ısica del Espacio (IAFE) and Departamento de F´ısica, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires and CONICET, Argentina. 2Bartol Res. Institute, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA. 3IGPP, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA. 4Institute of Earth, Oceans and Space, University of New Hampshire, New Hampshire, USA. [email protected] Abstract: The propagation of galactic and solar cosmic rays in the solar wind (SW) can be strongly influenced by the SW fluctuations properties. Magnetohydrodynamic scale fluctuations in the solar wind are usually highly anisotropic, and have also been found to exhibit different properties in regions of high and low solar wind speed. Previous studies analyzed the anisotropy properties of the solar wind magnetic fluctuations at scales of the order of (105 106) km (inertial range) using two times – single point measurements (assuming the Taylor frozen-in− hypothesis), and found that the fluctuations in the fast solar wind tend to reside in wave vectors with their parallel component (to the mean magnetic field) larger than the perpendicular one, while the fluctuations in the slow wind present the opossite trend. In the present study we compare the magnetic autocorrelation function in the solar wind obtained with two times – single point observations (from a single spacecraft) with the same quantity obtained from single time – two points measurements (from simultaneous observations of two spacecraft, observing the pure spatial structures). We preliminarily compare also previous results of the anisotropy of the solar wind fluctuations, obtained from a single spacecraft, with our new multispacecraft analysis using combining observations from the ACE and Wind spacecraft. Introduction more readily perpendicular to B0 than those par- allel to it. Theories of scattering of energetic solar particles in Of the various descriptions of anisotropic wave the heliosphere [1] and solar modulation of galac- and turbulence properties of the solar wind, the tic cosmic rays [2] require knowledge of turbu- so-called ’Maltese cross’ [6] illustrates level con- lence parameters to express particle diffusion co- tours of the magnetic self correlation which are efficients. seen to have a cross-like pattern when plotted in In particular, several theories (as the quasi-linear a 2D plane where one of the axes is parallel to the theory [3]) need the correlation of the turbu- magnetic field. There is a lobe along each axis. A lent magnetic fields as an input that describe the suggestive but oversimplified interpretation is the cosmic-rays transport presence of two components or populations: slab- k It is known that the presence of a uniform ’direct like fluctuations (with wavevectors, , mainly par- current’ (constant in space and time) magnetic field allel to the mean field: k// >> k ) and quasi-2D- like fluctuations (having k mainly⊥ perpendicular to (B0) in a turbulent MHD system develops spectral B0: k >> k//). anisotropies for isotropic initial conditions (e.g., ⊥ [4, 5]): high wavenumbers components develop Unidirectionally propagating Alfven´ waves corre- spond to values of the normalized cross helicity 625 MAGNETIC CORRELATION IN THE SOLAR WIND 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 Rb(r)/Rb(0) 0.2 0 −0.2 0 500 1000 1500 separation distance, r [R ] E Figure 1: Comparison of Rb from ACE-SSC (solid line), Wind-SSC (dotted line), and ACE/Wind-TSC (asterisk). (σc) equal to +1 or -1, depending of the sense of Recently a few studies on the spatial dependence of the propagation, while high levels of turbulence are the magnetic correlation function in the solar wind usually accompanied by a value of σc close to zero from two spacecraft (TSC, using two-point/single- (see, e.g., [7], and references therein). From an time) were done [10, 11, 12] using data from the analysis of 5 years of solar wind data (one minute Cluster fleet. However, detailed comparison be- of time cadence) measured by the spacecraft ACE tween the previous studies (using the single space- on the Sun-Earth line at 1AU, [8] shown that σc craft) and the new approach (using TSC) have not is roughly isotropic in the inertial range, a result been done yet. plausible with similar levels of turbulence for the In the present work we present a comparison of ’slab-like’ population and for the ’quasi-2D-like’ magnetic correlation functions in the solar wind one. Using the same sample of solar wind data, 5 6 obtained from a SSC with those obtained from [9] found that at scales of the order of (10 − 10 ) TSC. We also present some preliminary results km (i.e., the inertial range) the fluctuations in the from the analysis of the anisotropy of the mag- fast solar wind present a trend to having a more netic fluctuations at the inertial range scales (∼ 5 6 abundant population with k// >> k than with − ⊥ 10 10 km), using TSC. k >> k//, while the fluctuations in the slow wind⊥ present the opposite trend (more abundant population with k >> k//). Data analysis, results, and conclusions ⊥ All these previous studies are based on single spacecraft (SSC, using two-times/one-point) ob- We analyze observations of the magnetic field servations. Because the solar wind speed is much measured by the Advanced Composition Explorer larger than the local Alfven/sound´ speeds, the spa- (ACE) and Wind spacecraft, using the same sam- tial correlation function can be measured in the di- ples (intervals of one day of duration, with a time rection of the flow direction (i.e., the solar wind cadence of one minute) than those used by [10]. fluctuations are convected in the reference frame Thus, we analyze here solar wind observations that of the spacecraft in a short time compared with the correspond to a distance of ∼ 1 AU from the Sun characteristic time scale of the dynamical variation and on the ecliptic plane. of the fluctuations). Our main goal is to compute, from two-points and single time observations, the spatial correla- 626 30TH INTERNATIONAL COSMIC RAY CONFERENCE 1 0.8 θ ε [0,25] (o) 0.6 θ ε [40,50] (∆) 0.4 θ ε [65,90] (*) Rb(r)/Rb(0) 0.2 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 separation distance, r [R ] E Figure 2: Observations of Rb from ACE/Wind-TSC for fast solar wind for different angular channels be- tween the spatial lag direction and B0. Exponential fit is included to each angular channel (dashed line for θ1ǫ[0◦, 25◦], dotted line for θ2ǫ[40◦, 50◦], and solid line for θ3ǫ[65◦, 90◦]). tion function of the form Figure 1 shows the comparison of Rb using ACE- SSC (solid line), Wind-SSC (dotted line), and Rb(r) =< b(0,t) · b(r,t) > (1) both ACE/Wind-TSC (asterisk). The mean value of the two SSC observations (RbACE SSC and Note that Equation 1 is the trace of the usual two- − RbACE SSC ) at a separation of 199RE (the sep- points correlation tensor for the magnetic field, aration− between ACE and Wind) resulted 0.16, where spatial and temporal translation symme- while Rb = 0.23; that means b ACE/Wind TSC tries were assumed. represents the fluctuating that the TSC-SSC ratio,− at spatial separations of magnetic field, and we will study the variance- 6 ∼ 10 km, is RbTSC /RbSSC ∼ 1.3. normalized correlation, In order to analyze the anisotropy of Rb from TSC, Rbnorm(r) = Rb(r)/ < b · b > , (2) which allow us to cover spatial lag directions inde- pendently from the angle between B0 and the solar with Rbnorm(0) = 1, as done in [8, 9, 10]. For wind flow direction, we split the full set of ana- simplicity of notation, we omit the “norm” label lyzed intervals according with three angular chan- hereafter. The SSC correlations were computed as nels for the angle (θ) between the direction of described in [8, 9], while the TSC correlations as the spatial lag, given by the relative positions be- described in [10]. tween ACE and Wind, and the mean magnetic field B 0 0 0 0 In this preliminary work we compare values for ( 0): 0 ≤ θ1 < 25 , 40 ≤ θ2 < 50 , and 0 ≤ 0 Rb obtained from SSC and TSC for the interval 65 θ3 < 90 . (selected from all intervals analyzed in [10]) hav- Because from SSC in previous studies there were ing the minimum angle (α) between the spatial lag only a few intervals for fast solar wind and for ex- direction for TSC (given by the relative position treme angles θ ∼ 0◦ and θ ∼ 90◦, in this first stage between ACE and Wind) and the Sun-Earth line; of the study we select only fast solar wind intervals thus, the spatial correlation from TSC corresponds (VSW > 470 km/sec). Figure 2 shows the normal- to the same direction of the intrinsec spatial lag ized Rb, only from TSC for fast solar wind and given by SSC. This interval corresponds to the full for different angular channels: symbol o is used to day of Oct 4, 1999, and it corresponds to α = 3◦. represent θ1 (spatial lag parallel to the mean field The separation distance between ACE and Wind is B0), symbol ∆ to represent θ2 (spatial lag at in- 6 B 199RE ∼ 10 km (RE = 6378km, is the Earth termediate angles respect to 0), and symbol ∗ to radius).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Astronomy & Astrophysics a Hipparcos Study of the Hyades
    A&A 367, 111–147 (2001) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000410 & c ESO 2001 Astrophysics A Hipparcos study of the Hyades open cluster Improved colour-absolute magnitude and Hertzsprung{Russell diagrams J. H. J. de Bruijne, R. Hoogerwerf, and P. T. de Zeeuw Sterrewacht Leiden, Postbus 9513, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands Received 13 June 2000 / Accepted 24 November 2000 Abstract. Hipparcos parallaxes fix distances to individual stars in the Hyades cluster with an accuracy of ∼6per- cent. We use the Hipparcos proper motions, which have a larger relative precision than the trigonometric paral- laxes, to derive ∼3 times more precise distance estimates, by assuming that all members share the same space motion. An investigation of the available kinematic data confirms that the Hyades velocity field does not contain significant structure in the form of rotation and/or shear, but is fully consistent with a common space motion plus a (one-dimensional) internal velocity dispersion of ∼0.30 km s−1. The improved parallaxes as a set are statistically consistent with the Hipparcos parallaxes. The maximum expected systematic error in the proper motion-based parallaxes for stars in the outer regions of the cluster (i.e., beyond ∼2 tidal radii ∼20 pc) is ∼<0.30 mas. The new parallaxes confirm that the Hipparcos measurements are correlated on small angular scales, consistent with the limits specified in the Hipparcos Catalogue, though with significantly smaller “amplitudes” than claimed by Narayanan & Gould. We use the Tycho–2 long time-baseline astrometric catalogue to derive a set of independent proper motion-based parallaxes for the Hipparcos members.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Vla–Hipparcos Distance to Betelgeuse and Its Implications
    The Astronomical Journal, 135:1430–1440, 2008 April doi:10.1088/0004-6256/135/4/1430 c 2008. The American Astronomical Society. All rights reserved. Printed in the U.S.A. A NEW VLA–HIPPARCOS DISTANCE TO BETELGEUSE AND ITS IMPLICATIONS Graham M. Harper1, Alexander Brown1, and Edward F. Guinan2 1 Center for Astrophysics and Space Astronomy, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA; [email protected], [email protected] 2 Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Villanova University, PA 19085, USA; [email protected] Received 2007 November 2; accepted 2008 February 8; published 2008 March 10 ABSTRACT The distance to the M supergiant Betelgeuse is poorly known, with the Hipparcos parallax having a significant uncertainty. For detailed numerical studies of M supergiant atmospheres and winds, accurate distances are a pre- requisite to obtaining reliable estimates for many stellar parameters. New high spatial resolution, multiwavelength, NRAO3 Very Large Array (VLA) radio positions of Betelgeuse have been obtained and then combined with Hipparcos Catalogue Intermediate Astrometric Data to derive new astrometric solutions. These new solutions indicate a smaller parallax, and hence greater distance (197 ± 45 pc), than that given in the original Hipparcos Catalogue (131 ± 30 pc) and in the revised Hipparcos reduction. They also confirm smaller proper motions in both right ascension and declination, as found by previous radio observations. We examine the consequences of the revised astrometric solution on Betelgeuse’s interaction with its local environment, on its stellar properties, and its kinematics. We find that the most likely star-formation scenario for Betelgeuse is that it is a runaway star from the Ori OB1 association and was originally a member of a high-mass multiple system within Ori OB1a.
    [Show full text]
  • Michael Perryman
    Michael Perryman Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge (1977−79) European Space Agency, NL (1980−2009) (Hipparcos 1981−1997; Gaia 1995−2009) [Leiden University, NL,1993−2009] Max-Planck Institute for Astronomy & Heidelberg University (2010) Visiting Professor: University of Bristol (2011−12) University College Dublin (2012−13) Lecture program 1. Space Astrometry 1/3: History, rationale, and Hipparcos 2. Space Astrometry 2/3: Hipparcos science results (Tue 5 Nov) 3. Space Astrometry 3/3: Gaia (Thu 7 Nov) 4. Exoplanets: prospects for Gaia (Thu 14 Nov) 5. Some aspects of optical photon detection (Tue 19 Nov) M83 (David Malin) Hipparcos Text Our Sun Gaia Parallax measurement principle… Problematic from Earth: Sun (1) obtaining absolute parallaxes from relative measurements Earth (2) complicated by atmosphere [+ thermal/gravitational flexure] (3) no all-sky visibility Some history: the first 2000 years • 200 BC (ancient Greeks): • size and distance of Sun and Moon; motion of the planets • 900–1200: developing Islamic culture • 1500–1700: resurgence of scientific enquiry: • Earth moves around the Sun (Copernicus), better observations (Tycho) • motion of the planets (Kepler); laws of gravity and motion (Newton) • navigation at sea; understanding the Earth’s motion through space • 1718: Edmond Halley • first to measure the movement of the stars through space • 1725: James Bradley measured stellar aberration • Earth’s motion; finite speed of light; immensity of stellar distances • 1783: Herschel inferred Sun’s motion through space • 1838–39: Bessell/Henderson/Struve
    [Show full text]
  • Cmes, Solar Wind and Sun-Earth Connections: Unresolved Issues
    CMEs, solar wind and Sun-Earth connections: unresolved issues Rainer Schwenn Max-Planck-Institut für Sonnensystemforschung, Katlenburg-Lindau, Germany [email protected] In recent years, an unprecedented amount of high-quality data from various spaceprobes (Yohkoh, WIND, SOHO, ACE, TRACE, Ulysses) has been piled up that exhibit the enormous variety of CME properties and their effects on the whole heliosphere. Journals and books abound with new findings on this most exciting subject. However, major problems could still not be solved. In this Reporter Talk I will try to describe these unresolved issues in context with our present knowledge. My very personal Catalog of ignorance, Updated version (see SW8) IAGA Scientific Assembly in Toulouse, 18-29 July 2005 MPRS seminar on January 18, 2006 The definition of a CME "We define a coronal mass ejection (CME) to be an observable change in coronal structure that occurs on a time scale of a few minutes and several hours and involves the appearance (and outward motion, RS) of a new, discrete, bright, white-light feature in the coronagraph field of view." (Hundhausen et al., 1984, similar to the definition of "mass ejection events" by Munro et al., 1979). CME: coronal -------- mass ejection, not: coronal mass -------- ejection! In particular, a CME is NOT an Ejección de Masa Coronal (EMC), Ejectie de Maså Coronalå, Eiezione di Massa Coronale Éjection de Masse Coronale The community has chosen to keep the name “CME”, although the more precise term “solar mass ejection” appears to be more appropriate. An ICME is the interplanetry counterpart of a CME 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Astrometry and Optics During the Past 2000 Years
    1 Astrometry and optics during the past 2000 years Erik Høg Niels Bohr Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark 2011.05.03: Collection of reports from November 2008 ABSTRACT: The satellite missions Hipparcos and Gaia by the European Space Agency will together bring a decrease of astrometric errors by a factor 10000, four orders of magnitude, more than was achieved during the preceding 500 years. This modern development of astrometry was at first obtained by photoelectric astrometry. An experiment with this technique in 1925 led to the Hipparcos satellite mission in the years 1989-93 as described in the following reports Nos. 1 and 10. The report No. 11 is about the subsequent period of space astrometry with CCDs in a scanning satellite. This period began in 1992 with my proposal of a mission called Roemer, which led to the Gaia mission due for launch in 2013. My contributions to the history of astrometry and optics are based on 50 years of work in the field of astrometry but the reports cover spans of time within the past 2000 years, e.g., 400 years of astrometry, 650 years of optics, and the “miraculous” approval of the Hipparcos satellite mission during a few months of 1980. 2011.05.03: Collection of reports from November 2008. The following contains overview with summary and link to the reports Nos. 1-9 from 2008 and Nos. 10-13 from 2011. The reports are collected in two big file, see details on p.8. CONTENTS of Nos. 1-9 from 2008 No. Title Overview with links to all reports 2 1 Bengt Strömgren and modern astrometry: 5 Development of photoelectric astrometry including the Hipparcos mission 1A Bengt Strömgren and modern astrometry ..
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Solar
    Solar technology isn’t new. Its history spans from the 7th Century B.C. to today. We started out concentrating the sun’s heat with glass and mirrors to light fires. Today, we have everything from solar-powered buildings to solar- powered vehicles. Here you can learn more about the milestones in the Byron Stafford, historical development of solar technology, century by NREL / PIX10730 Byron Stafford, century, and year by year. You can also glimpse the future. NREL / PIX05370 This timeline lists the milestones in the historical development of solar technology from the 7th Century B.C. to the 1200s A.D. 7th Century B.C. Magnifying glass used to concentrate sun’s rays to make fire and to burn ants. 3rd Century B.C. Courtesy of Greeks and Romans use burning mirrors to light torches for religious purposes. New Vision Technologies, Inc./ Images ©2000 NVTech.com 2nd Century B.C. As early as 212 BC, the Greek scientist, Archimedes, used the reflective properties of bronze shields to focus sunlight and to set fire to wooden ships from the Roman Empire which were besieging Syracuse. (Although no proof of such a feat exists, the Greek navy recreated the experiment in 1973 and successfully set fire to a wooden boat at a distance of 50 meters.) 20 A.D. Chinese document use of burning mirrors to light torches for religious purposes. 1st to 4th Century A.D. The famous Roman bathhouses in the first to fourth centuries A.D. had large south facing windows to let in the sun’s warmth.
    [Show full text]
  • Constraints on the Exosphere of Corot-7B*
    A&A 525, A24 (2011) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014868 & c ESO 2010 Astrophysics Constraints on the exosphere of CoRoT-7b E. W. Guenther1,2, J. Cabrera3,4, A. Erikson3, M. Fridlund5, H. Lammer6,A.Mura7,H.Rauer3,9, J. Schneider4, M. Tulej8, Ph. von Paris3,andP.Wurz8 1 Thüringer Landessternwarte Tautenburg, Sternwarte 5, 07778 Tautenburg, Germany e-mail: [email protected] 2 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias, C/Vía Láctea, s/n, 38205 La Laguna (Tenerife), Spain 3 Institute of Planetary Research, German Aerospace Center, Rutherfordstraße 2, 12489 Berlin, Germany 4 LUTH, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS, Université Paris Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92190 Meudon, France 5 Research and Scientific Support Department, ESTEC/ESA, PO Box 299, 2200 AG Noordwijk, The Netherlands 6 Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Science, Schmiedlstraße. 6, 8042 Graz, Austria 7 Istituto di Fisica dello Spazio Interplanetario-CNR, Rome, Italy 8 Physics Institute, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland 9 Zentrum für Astronomie und Astrophysik (ZAA), Technische Universität Berlin (TUB), Hardenbergstraße 36, 10623 Berlin, Germany Received 26 April 2010 / Accepted 30 September 2010 ABSTRACT Context. The small radius and high density of CoRoT-7b implies that this transiting planet belongs to a different species than all transiting planets previously found. Current models suggest that this is the first transiting rocky planet found outside the solar system. Given that the planet orbits a solar-like star at a distance of only 4.5 R∗, it is expected that material released from its surface may then form an exosphere. Aims. We constrain the properties of the exosphere by observing the planet in- and out-of-transit.
    [Show full text]
  • Stemonstrations Classroom Connections Solar Energy
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Classroom Connections Solar Energy For more STEMonstrations and Classroom Connections, visit www.nasa.gov/stemonstation. www.nasa.gov Solar Energy Teacher Background th th Grade Level: 9 -12 Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS): HS-ESS3-2. Earth and Human Activity: Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-beneft ratios. Suggested Time: 50 minutes Performance Expectation Grade: High School (9-12) Background Solar energy is radiant energy produced by the sun. Every day, silicon and directly convert sunlight to electricity using a process the sun radiates an enormous amount of energy. The amount of called photovoltaics. solar energy a location on Earth receives depends on latitude (as The solar arrays produce more power than the space station it relates to the season of the year, the angle of the sun, and the needs at one time for all of the systems and experiments onboard. amount of daylight hours) and whether or not the sky is cloudy. When the space station is in the sunlight, about 60 percent of the A solar collector is one way to collect heat from the sun. A closed electricity generated by the solar arrays is used to charge batteries. car on a sunny day is like a solar collector. As sunlight passes These batteries are able to power the space station when it is not through the car’s glass windows, it is absorbed by the seat covers, in sunlight. walls, and foor of the car. The light changes into heat, which is On Earth, the electricity coming from power plants is alternating trapped in the car.
    [Show full text]
  • Sdo Sdt Report.Pdf
    Solar Dynamics Observatory “…to understand the nature and source of the solar variations that affect life and society.” Report of the Science Definition Team Solar Dynamics Observatory Science Definition Team David Hathaway John W. Harvey K. D. Leka Chairman National Solar Observatory Colorado Research Division Code SD50 P.O. Box 26732 Northwest Research Assoc. NASA/MSFC Tucson, AZ 85726 3380 Mitchell Lane Huntsville, AL 35812 Boulder, CO 80301 Spiro Antiochos Donald M. Hassler David Rust Code 7675 Southwest Research Institute Applied Physics Laboratory Naval Research Laboratory 1050 Walnut St., Suite 426 Johns Hopkins University Washington, DC 20375 Boulder, Colorado 80302 Laurel, MD 20723 Thomas Bogdan J. Todd Hoeksema Philip Scherrer High Altitude Observatory Code S HEPL Annex B211 P. O. Box 3000 NASA/Headquarters Stanford University Boulder, CO 80307 Washington, DC 20546 Stanford, CA 94305 Joseph Davila Jeffrey Kuhn Rainer Schwenn Code 682 Institute for Astronomy Max-Planck-Institut für Aeronomie NASA/GSFC University of Hawaii Max Planck Str. 2 Greenbelt, MD 20771 2680 Woodlawn Drive Katlenburg-Lindau Honolulu, HI 96822 D37191 GERMANY Kenneth Dere Barry LaBonte Leonard Strachan Code 4163 Institute for Astronomy Harvard-Smithsonian Naval Research Laboratory University of Hawaii Center for Astrophysics Washington, DC 20375 2680 Woodlawn Drive 60 Garden Street Honolulu, HI 96822 Cambridge, MA 02138 Bernhard Fleck Judith Lean Alan Title ESA Space Science Dept. Code 7673L Lockheed Martin Corp. c/o NASA/GSFC Naval Research Laboratory 3251 Hanover Street Code 682.3 Washington, DC 20375 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Greenbelt, MD 20771 Richard Harrison John Leibacher Roger Ulrich CCLRC National Solar Observatory Department of Astronomy Chilton, Didcot P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of the Solar Wind 25 November 2019, by Science@Nasa
    Effects of the solar wind 25 November 2019, by Science@nasa particles and magnetic fields that comprise the solar wind. More specifically, two of its main goals are to examine the energy that heats the corona and speeds up the solar wind, and determine the structure of the wind's magnetic fields. While many theories describe the solar wind's history, this is what we do know: The solar wind impacting Earth's magnetosphere is responsible for triggering those majestic auroras typically seen at locations close to our north and south poles. In some cases it can also set off space weather storms that disrupt everything from our satellites in space, to ship communications on our oceans, to power grids on land. Nicky Fox is the division director for heliophysics at NASA Headquarters. She explains in more detail how the solar wind disrupts our magnetosphere: "As the wind flows toward Earth, it carries with it the sun's magnetic field. It moves very fast, then X-rays stream off the sun in this image showing smacks right into Earth's magnetic field. The blow observations from by NASA's Nuclear Spectroscopic causes a shock to our magnetic protection, which Telescope Array, or NuSTAR, overlaid on a picture can result in turbulence." taken by NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO). Credit: NASA NASA also has another reason to study the solar wind and its properties—the solar wind is part of a larger space weather system that can affect astronauts and technology. As Fox notes: "We not The wind speed of a devastating Category 5 only have to ensure our astronauts are protected hurricane can top over 150 miles per hour from the harmful effects of radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Full-Sun Observations for Identifying the Source of the Slow Solar Wind
    Full-Sun observations for identifying the source of the slow solar wind David H. Brooks1,*, Ignacio Ugarte-Urra1 & Harry P. Warren2 1 College of Science, George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, Virginia 22030, USA 2 Space Science Division, Naval Research Laboratory, 4555 Overlook Avenue SW, Washington, District Of Columbia 20375, USA * Correspondence to: [email protected] Present address: Hinode Team, ISAS/JAXA, 3-1-1 Yoshinodai, Chuo-ku, Sagamihara, Kanagawa 252-5210, Japan Abstract: Fast (>700 km s−1) and slow (~400 km s−1) winds stream from the Sun, permeate the heliosphere and influence the near-Earth environment. While the fast wind is known to emanate primarily from polar coronal holes, the source of the slow wind remains unknown. Here we identify possible sites of origin using a slow solar wind source map of the entire Sun, which we construct from specially designed, full- disk observations from the Hinode satellite, and a magnetic field model. Our map provides a full-Sun observation that combines three key ingredients for identifying the sources: velocity, plasma composition and magnetic topology and shows them as solar wind composition plasma outflowing on open magnetic field lines. The area coverage of the identified sources is large enough that the sum of their mass contributions can explain a significant fraction of the mass loss rate of the solar wind. Introduction Understanding the flow of energy and matter throughout the solar system is a fundamental goal of heliophysics, and identifying the solar sources of this flow would be a major step forward in achieving that objective.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues
    The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues SP±1200 June 1997 The Hipparcos and Tycho Catalogues Astrometric and Photometric Star Catalogues derived from the ESA Hipparcos Space Astrometry Mission A Collaboration Between the European Space Agency and the FAST, NDAC, TDAC and INCA Consortia and the Hipparcos Industrial Consortium led by Matra Marconi Space and Alenia Spazio European Space Agency Agence spatiale europeenne Cover illustration: an impression of selected stars in their true positions around the Sun, as determined by Hipparcos, and viewed from a distant vantage point. Inset: sky map of the number of observations made by Hipparcos, in ecliptic coordinates. Published by: ESA Publications Division, c/o ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Scienti®c Coordination: M.A.C. Perryman, ESA Space Science Department and the Hipparcos Science Team Composition: Volume 1: M.A.C. Perryman Volume 2: K.S. O'Flaherty Volume 3: F. van Leeuwen, L. Lindegren & F. Mignard Volume 4: U. Bastian & E. Hùg Volumes 5±11: Hans Schrijver Volume 12: Michel Grenon Volume 13: Michel Grenon (charts) & Hans Schrijver (tables) Volumes 14±16: Roger W. Sinnott Volume 17: Hans Schrijver & W. O'Mullane Typeset using TEX (by D.E. Knuth) and dvips (by T. Rokicki) in Monotype Plantin (Adobe) and Frutiger (URW) Film Production: Volumes 1±4: ESA Publications Division, ESTEC, Noordwijk, The Netherlands Volumes 5±13: Imprimerie Louis-Jean, Gap, France Volumes 14±16: Sky Publishing Corporation, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA ASCII CD-ROMs: Swets & Zeitlinger B.V., Lisse, The Netherlands Publications Management: B. Battrick & H. Wapstra Cover Design: C. Haakman 1997 European Space Agency ISSN 0379±6566 ISBN 92±9092±399-7 (Volumes 1±17) Price: 650 D¯ ($400) (17 volumes) 165 D¯ ($100) (Volumes 1 & 17 only) Volume 2 The Hipparcos Satellite Operations Compiled by: M.A.C.
    [Show full text]